1
|
Andegiorgish AK, Goitom S, Mesfun K, Hagos M, Tesfaldet M, Habte E, Azeria E, Zeng L. Community knowledge and practice of malaria prevention in Ghindae, Eritrea, a Cross-sectional study. Afr Health Sci 2023; 23:241-254. [PMID: 37545951 PMCID: PMC10398460 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v23i1.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about community knowledge and practice towards malaria prevention in Ghindae, Eritrea. METHODOLOGY A community based cross-sectional study design was employed among 380 households. Participants were selected systematically. RESULT More than eight-tenth (86.5%) of the respondents had heard information about malaria preceding the survey; health facilities (54.1%), television (23.7%). Majority (94.2%) mentioned mosquito bite as the main mode of malaria transmission. Fever was the predominantly (89.2%) identified sign/symptoms of malaria. ITN (84.4%) and environmental sanitation (67.3%) were well recognized preventive measures for malaria. Though most households (91%) possess bed nets, but only 37% were ragged on observation. Overall, 64% of the respondents have satisfactory knowledge and 57.3% had adequate practice towards malaria prevention. Malaria knowledge was significantly associated with increased age (p=0.001) and district areas (p=0.022). Malaria prevention practice was significantly associated with Tigrigna and Saho ethnic group (p=0.013), and districts (p=0.02). Districts showed significant difference with an OR=4.56 (95%CI, 1.29-16.09) on knowledge for district 04 and OR=1.98(95%-CI, 1.21-3.26) on practice for district 03 compared to district 01. Knowledge was associated with prevention (OR=1.99, 95%CI, 1.28-3.09). CONCLUSION Overall community knowledge and practice towards malaria prevention were satisfactory. Furthermore, comprehensive community interventions are paramount for effective sustainable control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanuel Kidane Andegiorgish
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710061, China
- School of Public Health, Asmara College of Health Sciences, Asmara Eritrea
| | | | | | | | | | - Eyasu Habte
- School of Public Health, Asmara College of Health Sciences, Asmara Eritrea
| | - Eyob Azeria
- School of Public Health, Asmara College of Health Sciences, Asmara Eritrea
| | - Lingxia Zeng
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710061, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gowelo S, Meijer P, Tizifa T, Malenga T, Mburu MM, Kabaghe AN, Terlouw DJ, van Vugt M, Phiri KS, Mzilahowa T, Koenraadt CJM, van den Berg H, Manda-Taylor L, McCann RS, Takken W. Community Participation in Habitat Management and Larviciding for the Control of Malaria Vectors in Southern Malawi. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2023; 108:51-60. [PMID: 36410320 PMCID: PMC9833073 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Larval source management (LSM) could reduce malaria transmission when executed alongside core vector control strategies. Involving communities in LSM could increase intervention coverage, reduce operational costs, and promote sustainability via community buy-in. We assessed the effectiveness of community-led LSM to reduce anopheline larval densities in 26 villages along the perimeter of Majete Wildlife Reserve in southern Malawi. The communities formed LSM committees which coordinated LSM activities in their villages following specialized training. Effectiveness of larviciding by LSM committees was assessed via pre- and post-spray larval sampling. The effect of community-led LSM on anopheline larval densities in intervention villages was assessed via comparisons with densities in non-LSM villages over a period of 14 months. Surveys involving 502 respondents were undertaken in intervention villages to explore community motivation and participation, and factors influencing these outcomes. Larviciding by LSM committees reduced anopheline larval densities in post-spray sampling compared with pre-spray sampling (P < 0.0001). No differences were observed between anopheline larval densities during pre-spray sampling in LSM villages and those in non-LSM villages (P = 0.282). Knowledge about vector biology and control, and someone's role in LSM motivated community participation in the vector control program. Despite reducing anopheline larval densities in LSM villages, the impact of the community-led LSM could not be detected in our study setting because of low mosquito densities after scale-up of core malaria control interventions. Still, the contributions of the intervention in increasing a community's knowledge of malaria, its risk factors, and its control methods highlight potential benefits of the approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Gowelo
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.,Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.,MAC Communicable Diseases Action Centre, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Paola Meijer
- Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tinashe Tizifa
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.,Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tumaini Malenga
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.,African Institute for Development Policy, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Monicah M Mburu
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.,Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.,Macha Research Trust, Choma, Zambia
| | - Alinune N Kabaghe
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.,Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dianne J Terlouw
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Michèle van Vugt
- Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kamija S Phiri
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Themba Mzilahowa
- MAC Communicable Diseases Action Centre, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | | | - Henk van den Berg
- Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lucinda Manda-Taylor
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Robert S McCann
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.,Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.,Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Willem Takken
- Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knowledge, practices and perceptions of communities during a malaria larviciding randomized trial in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0276500. [PMID: 36327271 PMCID: PMC9632894 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Urban malaria is becoming a major public health concern in major cities in Cameroon. To improve malaria vector control, a pilot larviciding trial was conducted to assess its impact on mosquito density and malaria transmission intensity in Yaoundé. The present study investigated perceptions and practices of communities on malaria control during the larviciding trial implemented in Yaoundé. Methods Quantitative and qualitative data were collected in non-intervention and intervention areas. Quantitative data were collected during three cross-sectional surveys using a structured pre-tested questionnaire while qualitative data were obtained through interviews. A total of 26 in-depth interviews and eight focus group discussions with community members were performed. A binary logistic regression model was used to assess the perception of the community on larviciding impact on some malaria or bed nets use indicators. Results People living in intervention areas were 2.64 times more likely to know the mode of malaria transmission (95% CI: 1.82–3.84; p<0.001) and 1.3 time more likely to know mosquito breeding habitats (95% CI: 1.06–1.56; p = 0.009) compared to those living in non-intervention areas. In intervention areas, interviewee opinions on larviciding were generally good i.e. most interviewees reported having noticed a reduction in mosquito nuisance and malaria cases following larviciding implementation; whereas in non-intervention areas no report of reduction of mosquito nuisance was recorded. LLINs were regularly used by the population despite the implementation of larviciding treatments. There was high interest in larviciding program and demand for continuation, even if this needs the community involvement. Conclusion The larviciding program in the city of Yaoundé did not negatively affected community members’ behaviour and practices concerning the use of treated nets. The study indicated the acceptance of larviciding program by the population. This positive environment could favour the implementation of future antilarval control activities in the city of Yaoundé.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kahamba NF, Finda M, Ngowo HS, Msugupakulya BJ, Baldini F, Koekemoer LL, Ferguson HM, Okumu FO. Using ecological observations to improve malaria control in areas where Anopheles funestus is the dominant vector. Malar J 2022; 21:158. [PMID: 35655190 PMCID: PMC9161514 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04198-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The most important malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa are Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis, Anopheles funestus, and Anopheles coluzzii. Of these, An. funestus presently dominates in many settings in east and southern Africa. While research on this vector species has been impeded by difficulties in creating laboratory colonies, available evidence suggests it has certain ecological vulnerabilities that could be strategically exploited to greatly reduce malaria transmission in areas where it dominates. This paper examines the major life-history traits of An. funestus, its aquatic and adult ecologies, and its responsiveness to key interventions. It then outlines a plausible strategy for reducing malaria transmission by the vector and sustaining the gains over the medium to long term. To illustrate the propositions, the article uses data from south-eastern Tanzania where An. funestus mediates over 85% of malaria transmission events and is highly resistant to key public health insecticides, notably pyrethroids. Both male and female An. funestus rest indoors and the females frequently feed on humans indoors, although moderate to high degrees of zoophagy can occur in areas with large livestock populations. There are also a few reports of outdoor-biting by the species, highlighting a broader range of behavioural phenotypes that can be considered when designing new interventions to improve vector control. In comparison to other African malaria vectors, An. funestus distinctively prefers permanent and semi-permanent aquatic habitats, including river streams, ponds, swamps, and spring-fed pools. The species is therefore well-adapted to sustain its populations even during dry months and can support year-round malaria transmission. These ecological features suggest that highly effective control of An. funestus could be achieved primarily through strategic combinations of species-targeted larval source management and high quality insecticide-based methods targeting adult mosquitoes in shelters. If done consistently, such an integrated strategy has the potential to drastically reduce local populations of An. funestus and significantly reduce malaria transmission in areas where this vector species dominates. To sustain the gains, the programmes should be complemented with gradual environmental improvements such as house modification to maintain biting exposure at a bare minimum, as well as continuous engagements of the resident communities and other stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najat F Kahamba
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, G128QQ, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Marceline Finda
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Halfan S Ngowo
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, G128QQ, Glasgow, UK
| | - Betwel J Msugupakulya
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Francesco Baldini
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, G128QQ, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lizette L Koekemoer
- Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Heather M Ferguson
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, G128QQ, Glasgow, UK
| | - Fredros O Okumu
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, G128QQ, Glasgow, UK.
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
- School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
García GA, Fuseini G, Mba Nlang JA, Nsue Maye VO, Bela NR, Wofford RN, Weppelmann TA, Matulis G, Efiri PB, Smith JM, Rivas MR, Phiri WP, von Fricken ME. Evaluation of a Multi-Season, Community-Based Larval Source Management Program on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea. FRONTIERS IN TROPICAL DISEASES 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fitd.2022.846955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundIn 2015 and 2016, the Bioko Island Malaria Control Project (BIMCP) introduced a pilot larvicide program, which recruited local volunteers to assess the sustainability and effectiveness of community-led larval source management. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the community-led LSM program to determine if this type of intervention could be used as a sustainable malaria control method on Bioko Island.MethodsThe pilot program was split into two phases, both taking place between February and December, with phase I in 2015 and phase II in 2016. During phase I, the BIMCP team assisted in identifying and treating Anopheles species mosquito breeding habitats. During phase II, community volunteers, with supervision from designated community leaders, identified and treated breeding habitats. Larval source management took place at thirteen locations around the Island during both phases. Human landing catches were conducted at seven sentinel sites once every month for the duration of the study period to determine average nightly biting rates.ResultsDuring phase I, 1,033 breeding sites were identified with a 100% treatment coverage rate. Only 970 breeding sites were identified in phase II with a 75% treatment coverage rate, a significant decrease from phase I (p<0.001). Between phase I and phase II, larvicide usage also decreased by 45% (95% CI: 32, 59%, p=0.003). However, excluding the sentinel site Balboa, vector density showed a nonsignificant (p=0.272) relationship between phase I and phase II.ConclusionOverall, community-based larval source management can be effective with strong operational management and oversight. However, repeated training and evaluation will be necessary to monitor the effectiveness and sustainability of such interventions.
Collapse
|
6
|
Runge M, Mapua S, Nambunga I, Smith TA, Chitnis N, Okumu F, Pothin E. Evaluation of different deployment strategies for larviciding to control malaria: a simulation study. Malar J 2021; 20:324. [PMID: 34315473 PMCID: PMC8314573 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03854-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Larviciding against malaria vectors in Africa has been limited to indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated nets, but is increasingly being considered by some countries as a complementary strategy. However, despite progress towards improved larvicides and new tools for mapping or treating mosquito-breeding sites, little is known about the optimal deployment strategies for larviciding in different transmission and seasonality settings. METHODS A malaria transmission model, OpenMalaria, was used to simulate varying larviciding strategies and their impact on host-seeking mosquito densities, entomological inoculation rate (EIR) and malaria prevalence. Variations in coverage, duration, frequency, and timing of larviciding were simulated for three transmission intensities and four transmission seasonality profiles. Malaria transmission was assumed to follow rainfall with a lag of one month. Theoretical sub-Saharan African settings with Anopheles gambiae as the dominant vector were chosen to explore impact. Relative reduction compared to no larviciding was predicted for each indicator during the simulated larviciding period. RESULTS Larviciding immediately reduced the predicted host-seeking mosquito densities and EIRs to a maximum that approached or exceeded the simulated coverage. Reduction in prevalence was delayed by approximately one month. The relative reduction in prevalence was up to four times higher at low than high transmission. Reducing larviciding frequency (i.e., from every 5 to 10 days) resulted in substantial loss in effectiveness (54, 45 and 53% loss of impact for host-seeking mosquito densities, EIR and prevalence, respectively). In seasonal settings the most effective timing of larviciding was during or at the beginning of the rainy season and least impactful during the dry season, assuming larviciding deployment for four months. CONCLUSION The results highlight the critical role of deployment strategies on the impact of larviciding. Overall, larviciding would be more effective in settings with low and seasonal transmission, and at the beginning and during the peak densities of the target species populations. For maximum impact, implementers should consider the practical ranges of coverage, duration, frequency, and timing of larviciding in their respective contexts. More operational data and improved calibration would enable models to become a practical tool to support malaria control programmes in developing larviciding strategies that account for the diversity of contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Runge
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland. .,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Salum Mapua
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | - Ismail Nambunga
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | - Thomas A Smith
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nakul Chitnis
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Fredros Okumu
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | - Emilie Pothin
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Clinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mapua SA, Finda MF, Nambunga IH, Msugupakulya BJ, Ukio K, Chaki PP, Tripet F, Kelly AH, Christofides N, Lezaun J, Okumu FO. Addressing key gaps in implementation of mosquito larviciding to accelerate malaria vector control in southern Tanzania: results of a stakeholder engagement process in local district councils. Malar J 2021; 20:123. [PMID: 33653355 PMCID: PMC7923449 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03661-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Larval source management was historically one of the most effective malaria control methods but is now widely deprioritized in Africa, where insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are preferred. However, in Tanzania, following initial successes in urban Dar-es-Salaam starting early-2000s, the government now encourages larviciding in both rural and urban councils nationwide to complement other efforts; and a biolarvicide production-plant has been established outside the commercial capital. This study investigated key obstacles and opportunities relevant to effective rollout of larviciding for malaria control, with a focus on the meso-endemic region of Morogoro, southern Tanzania. METHODS Key-informants were interviewed to assess awareness and perceptions regarding larviciding among designated health officials (malaria focal persons, vector surveillance officers and ward health officers) in nine administrative councils (n = 27). Interviewer-administered questionnaires were used to assess awareness and perceptions of community members in selected areas regarding larviciding (n = 490). Thematic content analysis was done and descriptive statistics used to summarize the findings. RESULTS A majority of malaria control officials had participated in larviciding at least once over the previous three years. A majority of community members had neutral perceptions towards positive aspects of larviciding, but overall support for larviciding was high, although several challenges were expressed, notably: (i) insufficient knowledge for identifying relevant aquatic habitats of malaria vectors and applying larvicides, (ii) inadequate monitoring of programme effectiveness, (iii) limited financing, and (iv) lack of personal protective equipment. Although the key-informants reported sensitizing local communities, most community members were still unaware of larviciding and its potential. CONCLUSIONS The larviciding programme was widely supported by both communities and malaria control officials, but there were gaps in technical knowledge, implementation and public engagement. To improve overall impact, it is important to: (i) intensify training efforts, particularly for identifying habitats of important vectors, (ii) adopt standard technical principles for applying larvicides or larval source management, (iii) improve financing for local implementation and (iv) improve public engagement to boost community awareness and participation. These lessons could also be valuable for other malaria endemic areas wishing to deploy larviciding for malaria control or elimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salum A Mapua
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania.
| | - Marceline F Finda
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Ismail H Nambunga
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania
| | - Betwel J Msugupakulya
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania
- School of Life Science and Bioengineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - Kusirye Ukio
- President's Office-Regional Administration and Local Government, Morogoro Regional Secretariat, P.O. Box 610, Morogoro, Tanzania
| | - Prosper P Chaki
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania
| | - Frederic Tripet
- Centre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, School of Life Sciences, Keele University, Huxley Building, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - Ann H Kelly
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola Christofides
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Javier Lezaun
- Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, 64 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6PN, UK
| | - Fredros O Okumu
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Morogoro, Tanzania.
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
- School of Life Science and Bioengineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania.
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Asale A, Kussa D, Girma M, Mbogo C, Mutero CM. Community based integrated vector management for malaria control: lessons from three years' experience (2016-2018) in Botor-Tolay district, southwestern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1318. [PMID: 31638928 PMCID: PMC6805624 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7606-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrated vector management (IVM) remains a key strategy in the fight against vector-borne diseases including malaria. However, impacts of the strategy should be regularly monitored based on feedback obtained through research. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of IVM for malaria control in Botor-Tolay district, southwestern Ethiopia after three years (2016-2018) of IVM implementation. METHOD Prior to the implementation of IVM, a survey of socio-demographic, malaria burden, and communities' perception towards malaria control was conducted in 200 households selected at random from 12 villages using standard questionnaire. Households were revisited after three years of project implementation for impact assessment. Compiled malaria case data was obtained from district health bureau for the three years period of the study while adult mosquito collection was conducted during each year using CDC light traps. Monthly larval mosquito collections were made each year using standard dipping method. Community education and mobilization (CEM) was made through different community-based structures. RESULTS The proportion of respondents who sought treatment in health facilities showed a significant increase from 76% in 2015 to 90% in 2018(P < 0.001). An average of 6.3 working and 2.3 school days were lost per year in a household due to parents and children falling sick with malaria. Malaria costs in a household in Botor-Tolay averaged 13.3 and 4.5 USD per episode for medical treatment and transportation respectively. Significantly fewer adult mosquitoes were collected in 2018 (0.37/house/trap-night) as compared to 2015 (0.73/house/trap-night) (P < .001). Malaria cases significantly declined in 2018 (262) when compared to the record in 2015 (1162) (P < 0.001). Despite improved human behavioral changes towards mosquito and malaria control, there were many setbacks too. These include reluctance to seek treatment in a timely manner, low user compliance of LLINs and low net repairing habit. CONCLUSION The coordinated implementation of community-based education, environmental management, larviciding together with main core vector control interventions in Botor-Tolay district in Southwestern Ethiopia have contributed to significant decline in malaria cases reported from health facilities. However, commitment to seeking treatment by people with clinical symptoms of malaria and to repair of damaged mosquito nets remained low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abebe Asale
- International Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| | - Dereje Kussa
- International Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Melaku Girma
- College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Charles Mbogo
- Kenya Medical Research Institute - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.,International Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Clifford Maina Mutero
- International Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.,School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria Institute for Sustainable Malaria Control, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Derua YA, Kweka EJ, Kisinza WN, Githeko AK, Mosha FW. Bacterial larvicides used for malaria vector control in sub-Saharan Africa: review of their effectiveness and operational feasibility. Parasit Vectors 2019; 12:426. [PMID: 31470885 PMCID: PMC6716942 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3683-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Several trials and reviews have outlined the potential role of larviciding for malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to supplement the core indoor insecticide-based interventions. It has been argued that widespread use of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) interventions in many parts of Africa result in many new areas with low and focal malaria transmission that can be targeted with larvicides. As some countries in SSA are making good progress in malaria control, larval source management, particularly with bacterial larvicides, could be included in the list of viable options to maintain the gains achieved while paving the way to malaria elimination. We conducted a review of published literature that investigated the application of bacterial larvicides, Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti) and/or Bacillus sphaericus (Bs) for malaria vector control in SSA. Data for the review were identified through PubMed, the extensive files of the authors and reference lists of relevant articles retrieved. A total of 56 relevant studies were identified and included in the review. The findings indicated that, at low application rates, bacterial larvicide products based on Bti and/or Bs were effective in controlling malaria vectors. The larvicide interventions were found to be feasible, accepted by the general community, safe to the non-target organisms and the costs compared fairly well with those of other vector control measures practiced in SSA. Our review suggests that larviciding should gain more ground as a tool for integrated malaria vector control due to the decline in malaria which creates more appropriate conditions for the intervention and to the recognition of limitations of insecticide-based vector control tools. The advancement of new technology for mapping landscapes and environments could moreover facilitate identification and targeting of the numerous larval habitats preferred by the African malaria vectors. To build sustainable anti-larval measures in SSA, there is a great need to build capacity in relevant specialties and develop organizational structures for governance and management of larval source management programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yahya A Derua
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Tumaini University Makumira, Moshi, Tanzania. .,National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Centre, Muheza, Tanga, Tanzania.
| | - Eliningaya J Kweka
- Division of Livestock and Human Diseases Vector Control, Tropical Pesticides Research Institute, Arusha, Tanzania.,Department of Medical Parasitology and Entomology, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - William N Kisinza
- National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Centre, Muheza, Tanga, Tanzania
| | - Andrew K Githeko
- Climate and Human Health Research Unit, Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Franklin W Mosha
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Tumaini University Makumira, Moshi, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Killeen GF, Govella NJ, Mlacha YP, Chaki PP. Suppression of malaria vector densities and human infection prevalence associated with scale-up of mosquito-proofed housing in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: re-analysis of an observational series of parasitological and entomological surveys. Lancet Planet Health 2019; 3:e132-e143. [PMID: 30904112 DOI: 10.1016/s2542-5196(19)30035-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the city of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, rapid and spontaneous scale-up of window screening occurred through purely horizontal commercial distribution systems without any public subsidies or promotion. Scale-up of window screening coincided with a planned evaluation of programmatic, vertically managed scale-up of regular larvicide application as an intervention against malaria vectors and transmission. We aimed to establish whether scale-up of window screening was associated with suppression of mosquito populations, especially for malaria vectors that strongly prefer humans as their source of blood. METHODS This study was a re-analysis of a previous observational series of epidemiological data plus new analyses of previously partly reported complementary entomological data, from Dar es Salaam. Between 2004 and 2008, six rounds of cluster-sampled, rolling, cross-sectional parasitological and questionnaire surveys were done in urban Dar es Salaam to assess the effect of larviciding and other determinants of malaria risk, such as use of bed nets and antimalarial drugs, socioeconomic status, age, sex, travel history, mosquito-proofed housing, and spending time outdoors. The effects of scaled-up larvicide application and window screening were estimated by fitting generalised linear mixed models that allowed for both spatial variation between survey locations and temporal autocorrelation within locations. We also conducted continuous longitudinal entomological surveys of outdoor human biting rates by mosquitoes and experimental measurements of mosquito host preferences. FINDINGS Best-fit models of Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection prevalence among humans were largely consistent with the results of the previous analyses. Re-analysis of previously reported epidemiological data revealed that most of the empirically fitted downward time trend in P falciparum malaria prevalence over the course of the study (odds ratio [OR] 0·04; 95% CI 0·03-0·06; p<0·0001), which was not previously reported numerically or attributed to any explanatory factor, could be plausibly explained by association with an upward trend in city-wide window screening coverage (OR 0·07; 0·05-0·09; p<0·0001) and progressive rollout of larviciding (OR 0·50; 0·41-0·60; p<0·0001). Increasing coverage of complete window screening was also associated with reduced biting densities of all taxonomic groups of mosquitoes (all p<0·0001), especially the Anopheles gambiae complex (relative rate [RR] 0·23; 95% CI 0·16-0·33) and Anopheles funestus group (RR 0·08; 0·04-0·16), which were confirmed as the most efficient vectors of malaria with strong preferences for humans over cattle. Larviciding was also associated with reduced biting densities of all mosquito taxa (p<0·0001), to an extent that varied consistently with the larvicide targeting scheme and known larval ecology of each taxon. INTERPRETATION Community-wide mosquito proofing of houses might deliver greater impacts on vector populations and malaria transmission than previously thought. The spontaneous nature of the scale-up observed here is also encouraging with regards to practicality, acceptability, and affordability in low-income settings. FUNDING United States Agency for International Development, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and Valent BioSciences LLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerry F Killeen
- Ifakara Health Institute, Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Nicodem J Govella
- Ifakara Health Institute, Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Yeromin P Mlacha
- Ifakara Health Institute, Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Prosper P Chaki
- Ifakara Health Institute, Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sense of community and willingness to support malaria intervention programme in urban poor Accra, Ghana. Malar J 2018; 17:289. [PMID: 30097021 PMCID: PMC6086070 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2424-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The extensive research on community members’ willingness to support malaria interventions ignores the role of psychosocial determinants. This study assesses the impact of individuals’ sense of community (perceptions of community cohesion, altruism, seeking help from neighbours and migrant status) on their willingness to participate in a mosquito control programme using data on 768 individuals from the 2013 RIPS Urban Health and Poverty Survey in poor coastal communities in Accra, Ghana. A contingent valuation experiment was employed to elicit individuals’ willingness to support the programme by contributing nothing, labour time/money only or both. Results Findings show that different dimensions of sense of community related differently with willingness to support the programme. Perceived community cohesion was associated with lower odds while help-seeking from neighbours and being a migrant were associated with higher odds of supporting the programme. Altruism was the only dimension not linked to willingness to participate. Conclusions Different dimensions of sense of community are associated with community members’ willingness to provide labour, time or both to support the malaria eradication programme. The findings of this study have implications for targeting social relational aspects, in addition to geographical aspects, of communities with malaria-resilient policy and intervention. They also warrant further research on psychosocial factors that predict willingness to support health programmes in urban poor settings.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abejirinde IOO, Ingabire CM, van Vugt M, Mutesa L, van den Borne B, Busari JO. Qualitative analysis of the health system effects of a community-based malaria elimination program in Rwanda. Res Rep Trop Med 2018; 9:63-75. [PMID: 30050356 PMCID: PMC6049060 DOI: 10.2147/rrtm.s158131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To identify the health system-strengthening role of a community-based malaria elimination program in Ruhuha, Rwanda, and the ways by which health system effects may have been achieved. Materials and methods Qualitative data were collected through 14 semi-structured in-depth interviews and five focus group discussions with various stakeholders. These data were supported by analysis of project documents. Results Use of a transdisciplinary approach allowed the program to influence several crosscutting issues spanning four broad areas – social collaboration; capacity building; structural alignment; and knowledge translation. Health system effects were identified mostly at the micro (i.e., district) level, with limited impact on strengthening national and subnational policies. Although systems thinking was not explicitly applied, the project had positive spillover effects on the health system. These include expanding the informal health workforce and introducing innovative approaches aligned to the national malaria strategy for vector control. Findings also show that the elimination program contributed to an increased understanding of the transmission dynamics of malaria in Ruhuha. Conclusion The community-based malaria elimination program in Ruhuha successfully created a stable foundation for community mobilization toward malaria control, and explored innovative ways for long-term financing for malaria elimination. The transdisciplinary nature of the project, use of horizontal facilitation techniques for community engagement, and the sociocultural context in which the program was implemented are possible mechanisms by which systems strengthening was achieved. The knowledge gained from this assessment can be used to improve future community-focused interventions for malaria control, and develop a sustainable strategy for community engagement in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde
- Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,
| | | | - Michele van Vugt
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leon Mutesa
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Bart van den Borne
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jamiu O Busari
- Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.,Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mwakalinga VM, Sartorius BKD, Limwagu AJ, Mlacha YP, Msellemu DF, Chaki PP, Govella NJ, Coetzee M, Dongus S, Killeen GF. Topographic mapping of the interfaces between human and aquatic mosquito habitats to enable barrier targeting of interventions against malaria vectors. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2018; 5:161055. [PMID: 29892341 PMCID: PMC5990771 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.161055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Geophysical topographic metrics of local water accumulation potential are freely available and have long been known as high-resolution predictors of where aquatic habitats for immature Anopheles mosquitoes are most abundant, resulting in elevated densities of adult malaria vectors and human infection burden. Using existing entomological and epidemiological survey data, here we illustrate how topography can also be used to map out the interfaces between wet, unoccupied valleys and dry, densely populated uplands, where malaria vector densities and infection risk are focally exacerbated. These topographically identifiable geophysical boundaries experience disproportionately high vector densities and malaria transmission risk, because this is where Anopheles mosquitoes first encounter humans when they search for blood after emerging or ovipositing in the valleys. Geophysical topographic indicators accounted for 67% of variance for vector density but for only 43% for infection prevalence, so they could enable very selective targeting of interventions against the former but not the latter (targeting ratios of 5.7 versus 1.5 to 1, respectively). So, in addition to being useful for targeting larval source management to wet valleys, geophysical topographic indicators may also be used to selectively target adult Anopheles mosquitoes with insecticidal residual sprays, fencing, vapour emanators or space sprays to barrier areas along their fringes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria M. Mwakalinga
- School of Urban and Regional Planning, Department of Housing and Infrastructure Planning, Ardhi University, PO Box 35176, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Benn K. D. Sartorius
- Discipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Alex J. Limwagu
- Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Yeromin P. Mlacha
- Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Daniel F. Msellemu
- Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Prosper P. Chaki
- Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Nicodem J. Govella
- Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Maureen Coetzee
- Wits Research Institute for Malaria and Wits/MRC Collaborating Centre for Multidisciplinary Research on Malaria, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Stefan Dongus
- Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, PO Box, 4002 Basel, Switzerland
- Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
| | - Gerry F. Killeen
- Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bardosh KL, Ryan SJ, Ebi K, Welburn S, Singer B. Addressing vulnerability, building resilience: community-based adaptation to vector-borne diseases in the context of global change. Infect Dis Poverty 2017; 6:166. [PMID: 29228986 PMCID: PMC5725972 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-017-0375-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The threat of a rapidly changing planet – of coupled social, environmental and climatic change – pose new conceptual and practical challenges in responding to vector-borne diseases. These include non-linear and uncertain spatial-temporal change dynamics associated with climate, animals, land, water, food, settlement, conflict, ecology and human socio-cultural, economic and political-institutional systems. To date, research efforts have been dominated by disease modeling, which has provided limited practical advice to policymakers and practitioners in developing policies and programmes on the ground. Main body In this paper, we provide an alternative biosocial perspective grounded in social science insights, drawing upon concepts of vulnerability, resilience, participation and community-based adaptation. Our analysis was informed by a realist review (provided in the Additional file 2) focused on seven major climate-sensitive vector-borne diseases: malaria, schistosomiasis, dengue, leishmaniasis, sleeping sickness, chagas disease, and rift valley fever. Here, we situate our analysis of existing community-based interventions within the context of global change processes and the wider social science literature. We identify and discuss best practices and conceptual principles that should guide future community-based efforts to mitigate human vulnerability to vector-borne diseases. We argue that more focused attention and investments are needed in meaningful public participation, appropriate technologies, the strengthening of health systems, sustainable development, wider institutional changes and attention to the social determinants of health, including the drivers of co-infection. Conclusion In order to respond effectively to uncertain future scenarios for vector-borne disease in a changing world, more attention needs to be given to building resilient and equitable systems in the present. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0375-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Louis Bardosh
- Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA. .,Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
| | - Sadie J Ryan
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.,Department of Geography, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Kris Ebi
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Susan Welburn
- Centre of Infectious Disease, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Burton Singer
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Makungu C, Stephen S, Kumburu S, Govella NJ, Dongus S, Hildon ZJL, Killeen GF, Jones C. Informing new or improved vector control tools for reducing the malaria burden in Tanzania: a qualitative exploration of perceptions of mosquitoes and methods for their control among the residents of Dar es Salaam. Malar J 2017; 16:410. [PMID: 29020970 PMCID: PMC5637339 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-2056-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2017] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of malaria prevention with long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying is limited by emerging insecticide resistance, evasive mosquito behaviours that include outdoor biting, sub-optimal implementation and inappropriate use. New vector control interventions are required and their potential effectiveness will be enhanced if existing household perceptions and practices are integrated into intervention design. METHODS This qualitative descriptive study used focus groups discussions, in-depth interviews and photovoice methods to explore mosquito control perceptions and practices among residents in four study sites in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. RESULTS Mosquitoes were perceived as a growing problem, directly attributed to widespread environmental deterioration and lack of effective mosquito control interventions. Malaria and nuisance biting were perceived as the main problem caused by mosquitoes. Breeding sites were clearly distinguished from resting sites but residents did not differentiate between habitats producing malaria vector mosquitoes and others producing mostly nuisance mosquitoes. The most frequently mentioned protection methods in the wealthiest locations were bed nets, aerosol insecticide sprays, window screens, and fumigation, while bed nets were most frequently mentioned and described as 'part of the culture' in the least wealthy locations. Mosquito-proofed housing was consistently viewed as desirable, but considered unaffordable outside wealthiest locations. Slapping and covering up with clothing were most commonly used to prevent biting outdoors. Despite their utility outdoors, topical repellents applied to the skin were considered expensive, and viewed with suspicion due to perceived side effects. Improving the local environment was the preferred method for preventing outdoor biting. Affordability, effectiveness, availability, practicality, as well as social influences, such as government recommendations, socialization and internalization (familiarization and habit) were described as key factors influencing uptake. CONCLUSIONS Outdoor transmission is widely accepted as an obstacle to malaria elimination. Larval source management, targeting both malaria vectors and nuisance-biting mosquitoes, is the preferred method for mosquito control among the residents of Dar es Salaam and should be prioritized for development alongside new methods for outdoor personal protection. Even if made available, effective and affordable, these additional interventions may require time and user experience to achieve positive reputations and trustworthiness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Makungu
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar Es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Stephania Stephen
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar Es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Salome Kumburu
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar Es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Nicodem J. Govella
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar Es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Stefan Dongus
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar Es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
- Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L35QA UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, P.O. Box 4002, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Zoe Jane-Lara Hildon
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar Es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Gerry F. Killeen
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, Dar Es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
- Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L35QA UK
| | - Caroline Jones
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ingabire CM, Hakizimana E, Rulisa A, Kateera F, Van Den Borne B, Muvunyi CM, Mutesa L, Van Vugt M, Koenraadt CJM, Takken W, Alaii J. Community-based biological control of malaria mosquitoes using Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti) in Rwanda: community awareness, acceptance and participation. Malar J 2017; 16:399. [PMID: 28974204 PMCID: PMC5627396 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-2046-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 09/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Targeting the aquatic stages of malaria vectors via larval source management (LSM) in collaboration with local communities could accelerate progress towards malaria elimination when deployed in addition to existing vector control strategies. However, the precise role that communities can assume in implementing such an intervention has not been fully investigated. This study investigated community awareness, acceptance and participation in a study that incorporated the socio-economic and entomological impact of LSM using Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti) in eastern Rwanda, and identified challenges and recommendations for future scale-up. Methods The implementation of the community-based LSM intervention took place in Ruhuha, Rwanda, from February to July 2015. The intervention included three arms: control, community-based (CB) and project-supervised (PS). Mixed methods were used to collect baseline and endline socio-economic data in January and October 2015. Results A high perceived safety and effectiveness of Bti was reported at the start of the intervention. Being aware of malaria symptoms and perceiving Bti as safe on other living organisms increased the likelihood of community participation through investment of labour time for Bti application. On the other hand, the likelihood for community participation was lower if respondents: (1) perceived rice farming as very profitable; (2) provided more money to the cooperative as a capital; and, (3) were already involved in rice farming for more than 6 years. After 6 months of implementation, an increase in knowledge and skills regarding Bti application was reported. The community perceived a reduction in mosquito density and nuisance biting on treated arms. Main operational, seasonal and geographical challenges included manual application of Bti, long working hours, and need for transportation for reaching the fields. Recommendations were made for future scale-up, including addressing above-mentioned concerns and government adoption of LSM as part of its vector control strategies. Conclusions Community awareness and support for LSM increased following Bti application. A high effectiveness of Bti in terms of reduction of mosquito abundance and nuisance biting was perceived. The study confirmed the feasibility of community-based LSM interventions and served as evidence for future scale-up of Bti application and adoption into Rwandan malaria vector control strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Marie Ingabire
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,Medical Research Center, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
| | - Emmanuel Hakizimana
- Malaria & Other Parasitic Diseases Division, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.,Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Alexis Rulisa
- Medical Research Center, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.,Department of Cultural Anthropology and Development Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Fredrick Kateera
- Medical Research Center, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.,Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Van Den Borne
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leon Mutesa
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | | | | | - Willem Takken
- Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jane Alaii
- Context Factor Solutions, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Killeen GF, Tatarsky A, Diabate A, Chaccour CJ, Marshall JM, Okumu FO, Brunner S, Newby G, Williams YA, Malone D, Tusting LS, Gosling RD. Developing an expanded vector control toolbox for malaria elimination. BMJ Glob Health 2017; 2:e000211. [PMID: 28589022 PMCID: PMC5444090 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2016] [Revised: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Vector control using long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) accounts for most of the malaria burden reductions achieved recently in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). LLINs and IRS are highly effective, but are insufficient to eliminate malaria transmission in many settings because of operational constraints, growing resistance to available insecticides and mosquitoes that behaviourally avoid contact with these interventions. However, a number of substantive opportunities now exist for rapidly developing and implementing more diverse, effective and sustainable malaria vector control strategies for LMICs. For example, mosquito control in high-income countries is predominantly achieved with a combination of mosquito-proofed housing and environmental management, supplemented with large-scale insecticide applications to larval habitats and outdoor spaces that kill off vector populations en masse, but all these interventions remain underused in LMICs. Programmatic development and evaluation of decentralised, locally managed systems for delivering these proactive mosquito population abatement practices in LMICs could therefore enable broader scale-up. Furthermore, a diverse range of emerging or repurposed technologies are becoming available for targeting mosquitoes when they enter houses, feed outdoors, attack livestock, feed on sugar or aggregate into mating swarms. Global policy must now be realigned to mobilise the political and financial support necessary to exploit these opportunities over the decade ahead, so that national malaria control and elimination programmes can access a much broader, more effective set of vector control interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerry F Killeen
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, United Republic of Tanzania
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Allison Tatarsky
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Abdoulaye Diabate
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
| | - Carlos J Chaccour
- Instituto de Salud Global, Barcelona Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Instituto de Salud Tropical, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - John M Marshall
- Divisions of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Fredros O Okumu
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, United Republic of Tanzania
- School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Shannon Brunner
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Gretchen Newby
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Yasmin A Williams
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - David Malone
- Innovative Vector Control Consortium, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lucy S Tusting
- Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Roland D Gosling
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae to insecticides used for malaria vector control in Rwanda. Malar J 2016; 15:582. [PMID: 27905919 PMCID: PMC5134262 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1618-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The widespread emergence of resistance to pyrethroids is a major threat to the gains made in malaria control. To monitor the presence and possible emergence of resistance against a variety of insecticides used for malaria control in Rwanda, nationwide insecticide resistance surveys were conducted in 2011 and 2013. Methods Larvae of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato mosquitoes were collected in 12 sentinel sites throughout Rwanda. These were reared to adults and analysed for knock-down and mortality using WHO insecticide test papers with standard diagnostic doses of the recommended insecticides. A sub-sample of tested specimens was analysed for the presence of knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations. Results A total of 14,311 mosquitoes were tested and from a sample of 1406 specimens, 1165 (82.9%) were identified as Anopheles arabiensis and 241 (17.1%) as Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto. Mortality results indicated a significant increase in resistance to lambda-cyhalothrin from 2011 to 2013 in 83% of the sites, permethrin in 25% of the sites, deltamethrin in 25% of the sites and DDT in 50% of the sites. Mosquitoes from 83% of the sites showed full susceptibility to bendiocarb and 17% of sites were suspected to harbour resistance that requires further confirmation. No resistance was observed to fenitrothion in all study sites during the entire survey. The kdr genotype results in An. gambiae s.s. showed that 67 (50%) possessed susceptibility (SS) alleles, while 35 (26.1%) and 32 (23.9%) mosquitoes had heterozygous (RS) and homozygous (RR) alleles, respectively. Of the 591 An. arabiensis genotyped, 425 (71.9%) possessed homozygous (SS) alleles while 158 (26.7%) and 8 (1.4%) had heterozygous (RS) and homozygous (RR) alleles, respectively. Metabolic resistance involving oxidase enzymes was also detected using the synergist PBO. Conclusion This is the first nationwide study of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors in Rwanda. It shows the gradual increase of insecticide resistance to pyrethroids (lambda-cyhalothrin, deltamethrin, permethrin) and organochlorines (DDT) and the large presence of target site insensitivity. The results demonstrate the need for Rwanda to expand monitoring for insecticide resistance including further metabolic resistance testing and implement an insecticide resistance management strategy to sustain the gains made in malaria control.
Collapse
|
19
|
Muema JM, Bargul JL, Nyanjom SG, Mutunga JM, Njeru SN. Potential of Camellia sinensis proanthocyanidins-rich fraction for controlling malaria mosquito populations through disruption of larval development. Parasit Vectors 2016; 9:512. [PMID: 27660043 PMCID: PMC5034625 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1789-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Accepted: 09/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anopheles arabiensis and A. gambiae (sensu stricto) are the most prolific Afrotropical malaria vectors. Population control efforts of these two vectors have been hampered by extremely diverse larval breeding sites and widespread resistance to currently available insecticides. Control of mosquito larval stages using bioactive compounds of plant origin has the potential to suppress vector populations leading to concomitant reduction in disease transmission rates. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of Camellia sinensis crude leaf extract and its fraction against the larvae of A. arabiensis and A. gambiae (s.s.). METHODS Late third/early fourth instar larvae (L3/L4) of A. arabiensis and A. gambiae (s.s.) were exposed to increasing doses of C. sinensis leaf extract and its active fraction for 72 h, with mortality rates recorded every 24 h in both control and test groups. Ultra performance liquid chromatography electron spray ionization quadruple time of flight coupled with mass spectrometry (UPLC/ESI-Qtof/MS) was used to determine the main active constituents in the fraction. RESULTS The major bioactive chemical constituents in the C. sinensis leaf extract were identified to be proanthocyanidins. The extract significantly interfered with larval survival and adult emergence in both species (ANOVA, F (5,24) = 1435.92, P < 0.001). Additionally, larval exposure to crude extract at 250 ppm and 500 ppm for 24 h resulted in larval mortality rates of over 90 % in A. gambiae (s.s.) and 75 % in A. arabiensis. A relatively lower concentration of 100 ppm resulted in moderate mortality rates of < 50 % in both species, but induced growth disruption effects evident as abnormal larval-pupal intermediates and disrupted adult emergence. The estimated LC50 concentrations of the crude leaf extract against A. arabiensis and A. gambiae (s.s.) larvae at 24 h were 154.58 ppm (95 % CI: 152.37-158.22) and 117.15 ppm (95 % CI: 112.86-127.04), respectively. The bioactive polar fraction caused 100 % larval mortality in both vector species at 25 ppm. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate the potential of green tea extract and its active constituents in disrupting mosquito larval development. This could contribute to the control of mosquito populations and improved management of malaria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson M Muema
- Department of Biochemistry, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
| | - Joel L Bargul
- Department of Biochemistry, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.,Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics Unit, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Steven G Nyanjom
- Department of Biochemistry, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - James M Mutunga
- Malaria Research Programme, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Sospeter N Njeru
- Present Address: Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI) - Leibniz Institute for Age Research, D-07745, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rahman R, Lesser A, Mboera L, Kramer R. Cost of microbial larviciding for malaria control in rural Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health 2016; 21:1468-1475. [PMID: 27500959 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Microbial larviciding may be a potential supplement to conventional malaria vector control measures, but scant information on its relative implementation costs and effectiveness, especially in rural areas, is an impediment to expanding its uptake. We perform a costing analysis of a seasonal microbial larviciding programme in rural Tanzania. METHODS We evaluated the financial and economic costs from the perspective of the public provider of a 3-month, community-based larviciding intervention implemented in twelve villages in the Mvomero District of Tanzania in 2012-2013. Cost data were collected from financial reports and invoices and through discussion with programme administrators. Sensitivity analysis explored the robustness of our results to varying key parameters. RESULTS Over the 2-year study period, approximately 6873 breeding sites were treated with larvicide. The average annual economic costs of the larviciding intervention in rural Tanzania are estimated at 2014 US$ 1.44 per person protected per year (pppy), US$ 6.18 per household and US$ 4481.88 per village, with the larvicide and staffing accounting for 14% and 58% of total costs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We found the costs pppy of implementing a seasonal larviciding programme in rural Tanzania to be comparable to the costs of other larviciding programmes in urban Tanzania and rural Kenya. Further research should evaluate the cost-effectiveness of larviciding relative to, and in combination with, other vector control strategies in rural settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rifat Rahman
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Adriane Lesser
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Leonard Mboera
- National Institute for Medical Research, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Randall Kramer
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Msellemu D, Namango HI, Mwakalinga VM, Ntamatungiro AJ, Mlacha Y, Mtema ZJ, Kiware S, Lobo NF, Majambere S, Dongus S, Drakeley CJ, Govella NJ, Chaki PP, Killeen GF. The epidemiology of residual Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission and infection burden in an African city with high coverage of multiple vector control measures. Malar J 2016; 15:288. [PMID: 27216734 PMCID: PMC4877954 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1340-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2016] [Accepted: 05/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the Tanzanian city of Dar es Salaam, high coverage of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), larvicide application (LA) and mosquito-proofed housing, was complemented with improved access to artemisinin-based combination therapy and rapid diagnostic tests by the end of 2012. Methods Three rounds of city-wide, cluster-sampled cross-sectional surveys of malaria parasite infection status, spanning 2010 to 2012, were complemented by two series of high-resolution, longitudinal surveys of vector density. Results Larvicide application using a granule formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti) had no effect upon either vector density (P = 0.820) or infection prevalence (P = 0.325) when managed by a private-sector contractor. Infection prevalence rebounded back to 13.8 % in 2010, compared with <2 % at the end of a previous Bti LA evaluation in 2008. Following transition to management by the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MoHSW), LA consistently reduced vector densities, first using the same Bti granule in early 2011 [odds ratio (OR) (95 % confidence interval (CI)) = 0.31 (0.14, 0.71), P = 0.0053] and then a pre-diluted aqueous suspension formulation from mid 2011 onwards [OR (95 % CI) = 0.15 (0.07, 0.30), P ≪ 0.000001]. While LA by MoHSW with the granule formulation was associated with reduced infection prevalence [OR (95 % CI) = 0.26 (0.12, 0.56), P = 0.00040], subsequent liquid suspension use, following a mass distribution to achieve universal coverage of LLINs that reduced vector density [OR (95 % CI) = 0.72 (0.51, 1.01), P = 0.057] and prevalence [OR (95 % CI) = 0.80 (0.69, 0.91), P = 0.0013], was not associated with further prevalence reduction (P = 0.836). Sleeping inside houses with complete window screens only reduced infection risk [OR (95 % CI) = 0.71 (0.62, 0.82), P = 0.0000036] if the evenings and mornings were also spent indoors. Furthermore, infection risk was only associated with local vector density [OR (95 % CI) = 6.99 (1.12, 43.7) at one vector mosquito per trap per night, P = 0.037] among the minority (14 %) of households lacking screening. Despite attenuation of malaria transmission and immunity, 88 % of infected residents experienced no recent fever, only 0.4 % of these afebrile cases had been treated for malaria, and prevalence remained high (9.9 %) at the end of the study. Conclusions While existing vector control interventions have dramatically attenuated malaria transmission in Dar es Salaam, further scale-up and additional measures to protect against mosquito bites outdoors are desirable. Accelerated elimination of chronic human infections persisting at high prevalence will require active, population-wide campaigns with curative drugs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1340-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Msellemu
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.,Department of Immunology and Infection, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Hagai I Namango
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.,School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Victoria M Mwakalinga
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.,School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Alex J Ntamatungiro
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.,Department of Immunology and Infection, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Yeromin Mlacha
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.,Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Zacharia J Mtema
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Samson Kiware
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.,Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Neil F Lobo
- Eck Institute for Global Health, Notre Dame University, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | - Silas Majambere
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.,Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stefan Dongus
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.,Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christopher J Drakeley
- Department of Immunology and Infection, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Nicodem J Govella
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.,Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Prosper P Chaki
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.,Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gerry F Killeen
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania. .,Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Maheu-Giroux M, Castro MC. Cost-effectiveness of larviciding for urban malaria control in Tanzania. Malar J 2014; 13:477. [PMID: 25476586 PMCID: PMC4289051 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2014] [Accepted: 11/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Larviciding for malaria control can contribute to an Integrated Vector Management (IVM) approach. This intervention is currently supported in settings where breeding habitats are ‘few, fixed, and findable’, such as urban areas of sub-Saharan Africa, but the knowledge base regarding the cost-effectiveness of larviciding is non-existent. Methods Programme costs and effectiveness data were collected from the Dar es Salaam Urban Malaria Control Programme in Tanzania. Cost-effectiveness ratios (CER) were estimated from the provider and societal perspectives for standard indicators using different malaria transmission scenarios. Results CER for microbial larviciding were highly dependent on the assumed baseline malaria incidence rates. Using the societal perspective, net CER were estimated (in 2012 US dollars) at $43 (95% uncertainty intervals [UI]: $15-181) per disability-adjusted life year averted (DALY) when malaria incidence was 902 infections per 1,000 individuals, increasing to $545 (95% UI: $337-1,558) per DALY at an incidence of 122 per 1,000. Larviciding was shown to be cost-effective in Tanzania for incidences as low as 40 infections per 1,000 people per year. Conclusion This is believed to be the first study to estimate the cost-effectiveness of larviciding for urban malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa. The results support the use of larviciding as a cost-effective intervention in urban areas and managers of national malaria control programme should consider this intervention as part of an IVM approach. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1475-2875-13-477) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcia C Castro
- Department of Global Health & Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Killeen GF. Characterizing, controlling and eliminating residual malaria transmission. Malar J 2014; 13:330. [PMID: 25149656 PMCID: PMC4159526 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 303] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2014] [Accepted: 08/16/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) interventions can reduce malaria transmission by targeting mosquitoes when they feed upon sleeping humans and/or rest inside houses, livestock shelters or other man-made structures. However, many malaria vector species can maintain robust transmission, despite high coverage of LLINs/IRS containing insecticides to which they are physiologically fully susceptible, because they exhibit one or more behaviours that define the biological limits of achievable impact with these interventions: (1) Natural or insecticide-induced avoidance of contact with treated surfaces within houses and early exit from them, thus minimizing exposure hazard of vectors which feed indoors upon humans; (2) Feeding upon humans when they are active and unprotected outdoors, thereby attenuating personal protection and any consequent community-wide suppression of transmission; (3) Feeding upon animals, thus minimizing contact with insecticides targeted at humans or houses; (4) Resting outdoors, away from insecticide-treated surfaces of nets, walls and roofs. Residual malaria transmission is, therefore, defined as all forms of transmission that can persist after achieving full universal coverage with effective LLINs and/or IRS containing active ingredients to which local vector populations are fully susceptible. Residual transmission is sufficiently intense across most of the tropics to render malaria elimination infeasible without new or improved vector control methods. Many novel or improved vector control strategies to address residual transmission are emerging that either: (1) Enhance control of adult vectors that enter houses to feed and/or rest by killing, repelling or excluding them; (2) Kill or repel adult mosquitoes when they attack people outdoors; (3) Kill adult mosquitoes when they attack livestock; (4) Kill adult mosquitoes when they feed upon sugar or; (5) Kill immature mosquitoes in aquatic habitats. To date, none of these options has sufficient supporting evidence to justify full-scale programmatic implementation. Concerted investment in their rigorous selection, development and evaluation is required over the coming decade to enable control and, ultimately, elimination of residual malaria transmission. In the meantime, national programmes may assess options for addressing residual transmission under programmatic conditions through pilot studies with strong monitoring, evaluation and operational research components, similar to the Onchocerciasis Control Programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerry F Killeen
- Ifakara Health Institute, Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania.
| |
Collapse
|