Stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity

Complications Following Osseointegrated Transfemoral and Transtibial Implants: A Systematic Review

Lower limb amputation is a common orthopedic surgery in the United States and can be performed either above or below the knee. Prosthetics are typically externally fitted to the patient's residual stump; however, osseointegrated implants offer a potential alternative to this process. Transcutaneous limb osseointegration involves the intramedullary anchoring of an implant that can later attach to a prosthetic via a stoma in the residual limb. There are proposed benefits to this, including decreased skin and soft tissue complications as well as an increased sense of stability. As this is a relatively new procedure, the complications and efficacy are not well supported by the literature at this time. The primary aim of this analysis was to synthesize the currently available data on transfemoral and transtibial osseointegration in order to improve our understanding of the potential complications of the procedure. A literature search was performed in the following databases: Biomedical Reference Collection, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PubMed/MEDLINE. Articles were screened by three independent reviewers for studies written or available in English, study design, and study outcomes, including complications. No filter was applied for publication date, publication national origin, or sample size. A total of 20 articles were selected for the final qualitative analysis. This review demonstrates an overall low or non-inferior rate of both minor and severe complications in transtibial and transfemoral osseointegration. This procedure should be considered as an option during preoperative planning in the context of above-the-knee and below-the-knee amputations. However, continued studies with larger sample sizes and extended postoperative follow-up are necessary for a greater strength of recommendation.

In vitro and in silico methods for the biomechanical assessment of osseointegrated transfemoral prostheses: a systematic review

The amputee population according to the World-Health-Organization is about 40 million. However, there is a high abandon rate of socket prostheses for the lower limb (25%-57%). The direct connection between the external prosthesis and the patient's bone makes osseointegrated prostheses for transfemoral amputees advantageous (e.g., improvement of the motor control) compared to socket prostheses, which are currently the gold standard. However, similarly to other uncemented prostheses, the osseointegrated ones are at risk of aseptic loosening and adverse bone remodelling caused by stress-shielding. The preclinical assessment of these prostheses has already been evaluated using different methods which did not provide unanimous and comparable evidence. To compare data from different investigations, a clear and detailed overview of the methods used to assess the performance is necessary. In this review 17 studies investigating the primary stability, stress shielding and stress concentration of osseointegrated transfemoral prostheses are examined. Primary stability consists in the biomechanical stability upon implant insertion. Primary stability is assessed measuring extraction force (either with a pull-out or a push-out test) and micromotion at the interface between the implant and the host bone with LVDT (in vitro test) or numerical models. Stress-shielding causes adaptive changes in the bone density around metal implants, and thus in the bone strength and stiffness. Stress-shielding is assessed with strain gauges or numerical models measuring the load transfer and the strain distribution on the surface of the femur, and between the implant and the bone respectively. Stress concentration can lead to the formation of cracks inside the bone, resulting in fractures. The stress concentration is assessed measuring the load transfer and the strain energy density at the interface between the implant and the bone, using numerical models. As a result, a global view and consensus about the methods are missing from all these tests. Indeed, different setup and loading scenario were used in the in vitro test, while different model parameters (e.g., bone properties) were used in the numerical models. Once the preclinical assessment method is established, it would be important to define thresholds and acceptance criteria for each of the possible failure scenarios investigated.

Upper extremity prosthetic selection influences loading of transhumeral osseointegrated systems

Percutaneous osseointegrated (OI) implants are increasingly viable as an alternative to socket suspension of prosthetic limbs. Upper extremity prostheses have also become more complex to better replicate hand and arm function and attempt to recreate pre-amputation functional levels. With more functionality comes heavier devices that put more stress on the bone-implant interface, which could be an issue for implant stability. This study quantified transhumeral loading at defined amputation levels using four simulated prosthetic limb-types: (1) body powered hook, (2) myoelectric hook, (3) myoelectric hand, and (4) advanced prosthetic limb. Computational models were constructed to replicate the weight distribution of each prosthesis type, then applied to motion capture data collected during Advanced Activities of Daily Living (AADLs). For activities that did not include a handheld weight, the body powered prosthesis bending moments were 13–33% (range of means for each activity across amputation levels) of the intact arm moments (reference 100%), torsional moments were 12–15%, and axial pullout forces were 30–40% of the intact case (p≤0.001). The myoelectric hook and hand bending moments were 60–99%, torsional moments were 44–97%, and axial pullout forces were 62–101% of the intact case. The advanced prosthesis bending moments were 177–201%, torsional moments were 164–326%, and axial pullout forces were 133–185% of the intact case (p≤0.001). The addition of a handheld weight for briefcase carry and jug lift activities reduced the overall impact of the prosthetic model itself, where the body powered forces and moments were much closer to those of the intact model, and more complex prostheses further increased forces and moments beyond the intact arm levels. These results reveal a ranked order in loading magnitude according to complexity of the prosthetic device, and highlight the importance of considering the patient’s desired terminal device when planning post-operative percutaneous OI rehabilitation and training.

Initial stability of a percutaneous osseointegrated endoprosthesis with proximal interlocking screws for transhumeral amputees

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous osseointegrated devices for skeletal fixation of prosthetic limbs have the potential to improve clinical outcomes in the transhumeral amputee population. Initial endoprosthesis stability is paramount for long-term osseointegration and safe clinical introduction of this technology. We evaluated an endoprosthetic design featuring a distally porous coated titanium stem with proximal slots for placement of bicortical interlocking screws.

METHODS

Yield load, ultimate failure load, and construct stiffness were measured in 18 pairs of fresh-frozen and thawed cadaver humeri, at distal and proximal amputation levels, without and with screws, under axial pull-out, torsion, and bending loads. Paired statistical comparisons were performed without screws at the two resection levels, and at distal and proximal levels with and without screws.

FINDINGS

Without screws, the location of the amputation influenced the stability only in torsional yield (p = 0.032) and torsional ultimate failure (p = 0.033). Proximally, the torsional yield and the torsional ultimate failure were 44% and 47% of that distally. Screws improved stability. In axial pull-out, screws increased the distal ultimate failure 3.2 times (p = 0.003). In torsion, screws increased the yield at the proximal level 1.9 times (p = 0.035), distal ultimate failure load 3.3 times (p = 0.016) and proximal ultimate failure 6.4 times (p = 0.013). In bending, screws increased ultimate failure at the proximal level 1.6 times (p = 0.026).

INTERPRETATION

Proximal slots and bicortical interlocking screws may find application in percutaneous osseointegrated devices for patients with amputations, especially in the less stable proximal bone of a short residual limb.

Load exposure of osseointegrated implants for transfemoral limb prosthesis during running

Direct skeletal attachment of lower limb prostheses ensures direct load transfer between the prosthetic leg and the skeleton. Knowledge of the load characteristics at the boneimplant interface during high-loading activities is needed to understand the limitations of current implant systems, as well as to inform their future development. The present study estimates the load scenario at the bone-implant interface of a transfemoral amputee while running with kinematic symmetry between the prosthetic and the intact limbs corresponding to that of an ablebodied subject. Kinematic symmetry was used as this represents the ultimate aim of advanced bionic legs. Kinematic data and ground reaction forces from a running trial of an able-bodied subject were matched to a musculoskeletal model of a transfemoral amputee. The joint reaction forces at the boneimplant interface were calculated using inverse dynamics. The normalized peak forces and moments during a single gait cycle were calculated to 153 % BW (body weight) / -14.8 % BWm, 186 % BW / 16.2 % BWm and 56.8 % BW / -18.7 % BWm for the x- (anterior), y- (longitudinal), and z-axis (lateral-medial), respectively. These findings can potentially be used as design input for future implant systems and external safety devices.

Transhumeral loading during advanced upper extremity activities of daily living

Percutaneous osseointegrated (OI) implants for direct skeletal attachment of upper extremity prosthetics represent an alternative to traditional socket suspension that may yield improved patient function and satisfaction. This is especially true in high-level, transhumeral amputees where prosthetic fitting is challenging and abandonment rates remain high. However, maintaining mechanical integrity of the bone-implant interface is crucial for safe clinical introduction of this technology. The collection of population data on the transhumeral loading environment will aid in the design of compliance and overload protection devices that mitigate the risk of periprosthetic fracture. We collected marker-based upper extremity kinematic data from non-amputee volunteers during advanced activities of daily living (AADLs) that applied dynamic loading to the humerus. Inverse dynamic analysis was applied to calculate the axial force, bending and torsional moments at three virtual amputation levels representing 25, 50, and 75% residual humeral length. The influences of amputation level, elbow flexion constraint, gender and anthropometric scaling were assessed. Results indicate that the proximal (25%) amputation level experienced significantly higher axial forces and bending moments across all subjects when compared to distal amputation levels (p≤0.030). Constraining elbow flexion had a limited influence on peak transhumeral loads. Male subjects experienced higher axial forces during all evaluated activities (p≤0.023). Peak axial force for all activities occurred during jumping jacks (174.5N). Peak bending (57.6Nm) and torsional (57.2Nm) moments occurred during jumping jacks and rapid internal humeral rotation, respectively. Calculated loads fall within the range of implant fixation failure loads reported in cadaveric investigations of humeral stem fixation; indicating that periprosthetic fracture may occur during non-contact AADLs. These kinematic data, collected over a range of AADLs, will aid in the development of overload protection devices and appropriate post-operative rehabilitation protocols that balance return to an active lifestyle with patient safety.

Influence of transfemoral amputation length on resulting loads at the osseointegrated prosthesis fixation during walking and falling

BACKGROUND

Transfemoral amputation is a surgical measure in which the surgeon typically conserves as much tissue and bone as possible. Osseointegrated fixation of prostheses is a promising alternative to conventional socket-based fixation. However, osseointegrated prostheses pose some risk of possible bone fracture under unexpected high-impact loading scenarios, such as a fall, and this should be protected against by a safety element. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of amputation height on the forces and moments at the bone-prosthesis interface during normal gait and three falling scenarios.

METHODS

Forces and moments at four amputation heights were determined from a multi-body simulation driven by data captured from an able-bodied participant.

FINDINGS

In all three falling scenarios, forces were relatively independent of amputation height, while moments generally displayed considerable increases with shorter residual limb length. Peak moments ranged from 105Nm (SD 75) (most distal amputation height) to 229Nm (SD 99) (most proximal amputation height) for a "falling during gait" scenario.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings reveal the dependence of interface loads on amputation height in normal gait and falling. This information may lead to improved prosthesis safety elements against bending moments.