1
|
Serrano J, Martine L, Grosjean Y, Acar N, Alves G, Masson EAY. The importance of choosing the appropriate cholesterol quantification method: enzymatic assay versus gas chromatography. J Lipid Res 2024; 65:100561. [PMID: 38762123 PMCID: PMC11237936 DOI: 10.1016/j.jlr.2024.100561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Cholesterol is a major lipid of the animal realm with many biological roles. It is an important component of cellular membranes and a precursor of steroid hormones and bile acids. It is particularly abundant in nervous tissues, and dysregulation of cholesterol metabolism has been associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Huntington's diseases. Deciphering the pathophysiological mechanisms of these disorders often involves animal models such as mice and Drosophila. Accurate quantification of cholesterol levels in the chosen models is a critical point of these studies. In the present work, we compare two common methods, gas chromatography coupled to flame-ionization detection (GC/FID) and a cholesterol oxidase-based fluorometric assay to measure cholesterol in mouse brains and Drosophila heads. Cholesterol levels measured by the two methods were similar for the mouse brain, which presents a huge majority of cholesterol in its sterol profile. On the contrary, depending on the method, measured cholesterol levels were very different for Drosophila heads, which present a complex sterol profile with a minority of cholesterol. We showed that the enzyme-based assay is not specific for cholesterol and detects other sterols as well. This method is therefore not suited for cholesterol measurement in models such as Drosophila. Alternatively, chromatographic methods, such as GC/FID, offer the required specificity for cholesterol quantification. Understanding the limitations of the quantification techniques is essential for reliable interpretation of the results in cholesterol-related research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne Serrano
- Eye & Nutrition Research Group, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France; Sensory Perception & Glia-Neuron Interaction Research Group, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Lucy Martine
- Eye & Nutrition Research Group, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Yaël Grosjean
- Sensory Perception & Glia-Neuron Interaction Research Group, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Niyazi Acar
- Eye & Nutrition Research Group, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Georges Alves
- Sensory Perception & Glia-Neuron Interaction Research Group, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
| | - Elodie A Y Masson
- Eye & Nutrition Research Group, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Statins Do Not Directly Inhibit the Activity of Major Epigenetic Modifying Enzymes. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11040516. [PMID: 30974899 PMCID: PMC6521159 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11040516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 03/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The potential anticancer effects of statins-a widely used class of cholesterol lowering drugs-has generated significant interest, as has the use of epigenetic modifying drugs such as HDAC and DNMT inhibitors. We set out to investigate the effect of statin drugs on epigenetic modifications in multiple cell lines, including hepatocellular carcinoma, breast carcinoma, leukemic macrophages, cervical adenocarcinoma, and insulin-secreting cells, as well as liver extracts from statin-treated C57B1/6J mice. Cells or cell extracts were treated with statins and with established epigenetic modulators, and HDAC, HAT, and DNMT activities were quantified. We also examined histone acetylation by immunoblotting. Statins altered neither HDAC nor HAT activity. Accordingly, acetylation of histones H3 and H4 was unchanged with statin treatment. However, statins tended to increase DNMT activity. These results indicate that direct inhibition of the major classes of epigenetic modifying enzymes, as previously reported elsewhere, is unlikely to contribute to any anticancer effects of statins. This study concerned global effects on epigenetic enzyme activities and histone acetylation; whether statins influence epigenetic modifications in certain genomic regions, cannot be ruled out and remains to be investigated.
Collapse
|