Validation of a new tool to assess health-related quality of life in psoriasis: the PSO-LIFE questionnaire

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Psoriasis: A Systematic Review

Importance

Multiple patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for health-related quality of life (HRQL) exist for patients with psoriasis. Evidence for the content validity and other measurement properties of these PROMs is critical to determine which HRQL PROMs could be recommended for use.

Objective

To systematically review the validity of HRQL-focused PROMs used in patients with psoriasis.

Evidence Review

Using PubMed and Embase, full-text articles published in English or Spanish on development or validation studies for psoriasis-specific, dermatology-specific, or generic HRQL PROMs were included. Development studies included original development studies, even if not studied in psoriasis patients per Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) recommendations. If a study included multiple diagnoses, more than 50% of patients had to have psoriasis or psoriasis-specific subgroup analyses available. Data extraction and analysis followed the COSMIN guidelines. Two independent reviewers extracted and analyzed the data, including PROM characteristics, quality of measurement properties (structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, reliability, measurement error, criterion validity, construct validity, and responsiveness), and level of evidence. PROMs were classified into 3 levels of recommendations: (1) PROM recommended for use; (2) PROM requires further validation; and (3) PROM not recommended for use.

Findings

Overall, 97 articles were identified for extraction. This included 19 psoriasis-specific, 8 skin-specific, and 6 generic PROMs. According to COSMIN standards, most measures identified received a B recommendation for use, indicating their potential but requiring further validation. Only the Rasch reduced version of the Impact of Psoriasis Questionnaire (IPSO-11 Rasch) received an A recommendation for use given that it had sufficient content validity, structural validity, and internal consistency.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study identified a significant lack of information concerning the quality of HRQL measures in psoriasis. This gap in knowledge can be attributed to the fact that traditional measures were developed using validation criteria that differ from the current standards in use. Consequently, additional validation studies in accordance with contemporary standards will be useful in aiding researchers and clinicians in determining the most suitable measure for assessing HRQL in patients with psoriasis.

Implementing well-being in the management of psoriasis: An expert recommendation

Psoriasis causes detriment in a person's physical, mental and social health which impairs their quality of life (QoL). However, the current psoriasis management may not adequately address all relevant health domains. Since the goal of healthcare is to restore or maintain health, health outcomes should include all areas of the patient's overall health. Life satisfaction, QoL and patient well-being are essential to a comprehensive approach to the disease. With the inclusion of more people-centred policies, care of patients with psoriasis should evolve towards a holistic and integrated assessment of the disease impact, including subjective measures of well-being in order to encompass all aspects of health. The main objective of this expert review is to give the concept of well-being a place as an entity within the holistic therapeutic approach for patients with psoriasis. Identifying and defining common goals beyond the skin with the patient and testing them throughout the course of treatment will benefit and enhance treatment success. We propose a series of recommendations for application in clinical practice, providing tangible clinical guidance for implementing well-being in the management of psoriasis. Among the recommendations are the need to initially listen to the patient, to know their level of empowerment or what they want to achieve, their preferences in decision making, the evaluation of not only the physical but also the emotional impact of the disease (well-being), the definition of the aspects that can generate a cumulative deterioration of the disease throughout life, and a continuous assessment of the patient's preferences with the opinion of the expert clinician and the integration of the knowledge of external clinical evidence.

When Virtual Assistants Meet Teledermatology: Validation of a Virtual Assistant to Improve the Quality of Life of Psoriatic Patients

Teledermatology has given dermatologists a tool to track patients' responses to therapy using images. Virtual assistants, the programs that interact with users through text or voice messages, could be used in teledermatology to enhance the interaction of the tool with the patients and healthcare professionals and the overall impact of the medication and quality of life of patients. As such, this work aimed to investigate the effectiveness of using a virtual assistant for teledermatology and its impact on the quality of life. We conducted surveys with the participants and measured the usability of the system with the System Usability Scale (SUS). A total of 34 participants (30 patients diagnosed with moderate-severe psoriasis and 4 healthcare professionals) were included in the study. The measurement of the improvement of quality of life was done by analyzing Psoriasis Quality of Life (PSOLIFE) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaires. The results showed that, on average, the quality of life improved (from 63.8 to 64.8 for PSOLIFE (with a p-value of 0.66 and an effect size of 0.06) and 4.4 to 2.8 for DLQI (with a p-value of 0.04 and an effect size of 0.31)). Patients also used the virtual assistant to do 52 medical consultations. Moreover, the usability is above average, with a SUS score of 70.1. As supported by MMAS-8 results, adherence also improved slightly. Our work demonstrates the improvement of the quality of life with the use of a virtual assistant in teledermatology, which could be attributed to the sense of security or peace of mind the patients get as they can contact their dermatologists directly within the virtual assistant-integrated system.

Development and preliminary validation of the Adolescent Psoriasis Quality of Life instrument: a disease-specific measure of quality of life in adolescents with psoriasis

Background

No age‐appropriate and disease‐specific instrument currently exists to measure health‐related quality of life in adolescents with psoriasis (patients aged 12–17 years).

Objectives

To develop and provide preliminary validation of the Adolescent Psoriasis Quality of Life instrument.

Methods

Qualitative interviews with adolescents with psoriasis, parents of adolescents with psoriasis, and healthcare professionals informed the development of an initial item pool for the instrument, which was subsequently refined through cognitive interviews. Finally, data from an independent sample of adolescents with psoriasis (n = 50) were used for item reduction, scale construction and initial validation, using a combination of techniques from classical test theory and Rasch modelling.

Results

Rich qualitative data concerning health‐related quality of life in adolescents with psoriasis (from 18 adolescents, 14 parents and four healthcare professionals), combined with cognitive interview testing (n = 12), resulted in a 41‐item draft version. Item reduction led to the final version, a 17‐item instrument consisting of two subscales showing good fit to their respective Rasch models: psychosocial impact (12 items) and the impact of physical symptoms and treatment (five items). All a priori stated hypotheses regarding construct validity were supported. Both subscales and the total scale showed acceptable test–retest reliabilities (intraclass correlations 0·97, 0·89 and 0·96) and internal consistencies (Cronbach's α 0·94, 0·81 and 0·95).

Conclusions

The preliminary form of the Adolescent Psoriasis Quality of Life instrument shows promising psychometric properties. It can be used in daily clinical practice and research to support a patient‐centred approach and inform treatment planning.

What's already known about this topic?

Health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments should be targeted towards narrowly defined age groups, as life contexts of children, adolescents and adults may differ substantially.

Dermatology‐specific instruments have been used to measure HRQoL in adolescents with psoriasis, but it is not known whether these instruments accurately capture all relevant HRQoL aspects in adolescent psoriasis.

Age‐appropriate and psoriasis‐specific instruments may be more sensitive for HRQoL issues experienced by this unique group.

What does this study add?

The Adolescent Psoriasis Quality of Life instrument represents the first age‐appropriate and disease‐specific instrument for measuring HRQoL in adolescents (12–17 years old) with psoriasis.

It is intended for use in daily clinical practice to support dermatologists and other healthcare professionals in providing optimal care for adolescents with psoriasis.

Linked Comment: Blome. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:9.

Patient-reported outcomes assessment tools for use in psoriasis in Spain: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To review the literature on validated tools for measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in psoriasis in Spain. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the tools and describe the results of their practical application.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic review of studies validating or using instruments for assessing PROs in Spanish patients with psoriasis. Literature searches were performed in international (PubMed/Medline) and Spanish (Medes, Ibecs) databases. We also searched databases of instruments for measuring PROs (BiblioPRO, PROQOLID). The review included studies published in English or Spanish up to January 9, 2017. We also checked the reference lists of the key publications identified. The quality of the questionnaires was evaluated based on their psychometric properties (construct, transcultural adaptation, reliability, validity, feasibility, and sensitivity to change).

RESULTS

Eighteen publications were included. Six articles described the validation of Spanish versions of 5 PROs tools: 4 health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires specific to psoriasis and dermatologic diseases and 1 questionnaire specific to satisfaction with treatment. Our assessment of the HRQoL tools' psychometric properties showed that the PSO-LIFE questionnaire received the highest scores, although specific properties varied from instrument to instrument. The 12 remaining articles were observational studies that used the validated instruments. In use, these tools detected the high impact of psoriasis on HRQoL, especially in young female patients with severe disease.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified 5 specific instruments validated in Spain for scoring PROs in patients with psoriasis. The tools' psychometric properties vary, and it is essential to understand their strengths and weaknesses when selecting the right one for each situation. In use, these questionnaires are able to detect the high impact of psoriasis on patients' HRQoL. PROs provide useful information to complement routine clinical findings in psoriasis and may contribute to improving disease management.

Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis

Pharmacogenetics is the study of variations in DNA sequence related to drug response. Moreover, the evolution of biotechnology and the sequencing of human DNA have allowed the creation of pharmacogenomics, a branch of genetics that analyzes human genes, the RNAs and proteins encoded by them, and the inter-and intra-individual variations in expression and function in relation to drug response. Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics are being used to search for biomarkers that can predict response to systemic treatments, including those for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease with an autoimmune contribution. Although its etiology remains unknown, genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors play a role in its development. Diverse systemic and biologic therapies are used to treat moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, these treatments are not curative, and patients exhibit a wide range of responses to them. Moderate-to-severe psoriasis is usually treated with systemic immunomodulators such as acitretin, ciclosporin, and methotrexate. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs (adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab) are the first-line treatment for patients resistant to conventional systemic therapies. Although these therapies are very efficient, around 30-50% of patients have inadequate response. Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 and is used for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. New drugs (apremilast, brodalumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, and secukinumab) have recently been approved for psoriasis. However, response rates to systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis range from 35 to 80%, so it is necessary to identify non-invasive biomarkers that could help predict treatment outcomes of these therapies and individualize care for patients with psoriasis. These biomarkers could improve patient quality of life and reduce health costs and potential side effects. Pharmacogenetic studies have identified potential biomarkers for response to biologic treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. These biomarkers need to be validated in clinical trials involving large cohorts of patients before they can be translated to the clinic. We review pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics studies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Polymorphisms associated with adalimumab and infliximab response in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

Aim: This study evaluated the influence of pharmacogenetics in psoriatic patients treated with adalimumab and/or infliximab. Materials & methods: Prospective observational study evaluating the association of 124 polymorphisms with the response to adalimumab or infliximab (PASI75) in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis at 3 months (n = 95) and 6 months of treatment (n = 90). Significant SNPs for univariate analysis were subjected to multivariate analysis. Results: Five SNPs were associated with PASI75 at 3 months: rs6661932 (IVL), rs2546890 (IL-12B), rs2145623 (NFKBIA), rs9304742 (ZNF816A) and rs645544 (SLC9A8). Furthermore, rs1061624 (TNFR1B) was associated with PASI75 at 6 months. Conclusion: Nevertheless, these biomarkers should be validated in large-scale studies before implementation in clinical practice.

Polymorphisms associated with etanercept response in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

AIM

Few studies have evaluated the influence of pharmacogenetics in psoriatic patients treated with etanercept.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We evaluated the association between 124 polymorphisms with the response to etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis at 3 months (n = 78) and 6 months of treatment (n = 68).

RESULTS

The results of the multivariate analysis showed an association between polymorphisms rs13437088 (HLA-B/MICA), rs96844 (MAP3K1), rs2431697 (PTTG1), rs9304742 (ZNF816A) and the response to etanercept at 3 months. Besides polymorphisms rs928655 (GBP6) and rs2546890 (IL12B) were associated to response at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Nevertheless, these biomarkers should be validated in large-scale studies before its implementation in clinical practice.

Patient reported health outcomes and non-adherence in psoriasis patients receiving adalimumab or ustekinumab for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to compare health outcomes of patients using biologic therapies ustekinumab (UST) or adalimumab (ADA) for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) and assess biologics non-adherence.

METHODS

Two phases of web-based survey data were collected, assessing adult patients with PsO from a Diplomat® Specialty Pharmacy US claims database (Diplomat Specialty Pharmacy; Flint, MI). Measures included demographics, treatment and health characteristics/behaviors, treatment satisfaction, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and productivity. Pooled and stratified (by biologics experience) bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

UST (n = 262) versus ADA (n = 83) users more frequently had psoriasis cleared (40.5% versus 15.4%, respectively, with no visible signs), better HRQoL as per Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score = 0 (45.2% versus 19.2%), and higher current effectiveness satisfaction, all p < 0.05. Adjusting for covariates, UST versus ADA bio-naïve patients (n = 68) had better (53.4% lower) DLQI scores, lower percent body surface affected (%BSA; 0.85 versus 1.43), more %BSA improvement (-1.60 versus -1.03), and lower activity impairment (90.4% lower), all p < 0.05. Non-adherence to UST (11.8%) versus ADA (32.5%) was lower, p < 0.05, and more access versus forgetfulness-related. However, no significant differences emerged on outcomes between overall or bio-experienced UST and ADA users.

CONCLUSIONS

UST versus ADA PsO bio-naïve patients reported higher clearing rates, better DLQI, and lower activity impairment.

Development and psychometric validation of the REFlective evaLuation of psoriasis Efficacy of Treatment and Severity (REFLETS) questionnaire: a common measure of plaque-type psoriasis severity and treatment efficacy for patients and clinicians

BACKGROUND

To date, there is no global consensus on the definition of the severity of psoriasis. The REFlective evaLuation of psoriasis Efficacy of Treatment and Severity (REFLETS) questionnaire has recently been developed to provide a better understanding of plaque-type psoriasis severity and treatment efficacy from both patient and clinician perspectives.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate the new REFLETS questionnaire to evaluate patient and clinician perceptions of plaque-type psoriasis severity and treatment efficacy.

METHODS

Two similar versions of the REFLETS questionnaire were developed following a rigorous methodology for clinicians and patients, referring to 'the psoriasis of your patient' or to 'your psoriasis', respectively. An observational, longitudinal, multicentre study was conducted in France with 34 dermatologists and 430 mild to severe plaque-type psoriasis patients to finalize the questionnaire and evaluate its psychometric properties.

RESULTS

Two dimensions were defined--severity and treatment efficacy--with three subdimensions within severity (impact of psoriasis, symptoms and disease course), and two individual items on joint pain. The questionnaire was well accepted by clinicians and patients. Excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.66-0.98) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.83-0.94) were demonstrated. REFLETS scores were moderately to highly correlated to Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (r = 0.35-0.70), Skindex-29 (r = 0.46-0.82) and DLQI scores (r = 0.36-0.82). Patients with decreased psoriasis severity and those with increased treatment efficacy, according to patient global evaluations, had lower severity and higher treatment efficacy REFLETS scores, respectively.

CONCLUSION

REFlective evaLuation of psoriasis Efficacy of Treatment and Severity is a promising tool for assessing plaque-type psoriasis severity and treatment efficacy from patient and clinician perspectives. It may help to improve patient and clinician communication in treatment decision making.

Exploring the relationship between EQ-5D, DLQI and PASI, and mapping EQ-5D utilities: a cross-sectional study in psoriasis from Hungary

BACKGROUND

There is a growing interest in policy making for using utility measures and identifying algorithms to convert disease-specific measures into utilities.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the relationship between EQ-5D, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in psoriasis. To transform DLQI scores, and key clinical, demographic and health service utilisation variables into utilities.

METHODS

A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of 200 consecutive adult patients with moderate to severe psoriasis was carried out in two Hungarian university clinics. The relationship between the outcome measures were analysed with correlations and with the known-groups method. Bivariate and multivariate regression algorithms on EQ-5D scores were formulated.

RESULTS

The mean age of respondents was 51 years (SD = 12.9), 68.5% were male, and 51.5% received biological therapy. Median EQ-5D, DLQI, and PASI scores were 0.73, 3.0, and 3.45, respectively. EQ-5D showed a moderate correlation with the DLQI and with the PASI (r s = -0.48 and -0.43, p < 0.05). Strong correlation was found between DLQI and PASI (r s = 0.81, p < 0.05). DLQI and PASI discriminated better among groups categorised by the localisation of the lesions than EQ-5D. Presence of psoriasis on the neck and/or décolletage was associated with the greatest health related quality of life (HRQOL) impairment. Ten variables were incorporated in a multivariate algorithm that accounted for 48.8% of EQ-5D variance (ANOVA p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided the first evidence that patients with visible psoriatic lesions have significantly worse HRQOL compared to those with non-visible lesions, measured not only with DLQI but also with EQ-5D. In addition to demographic and clinical variables, our model included health service utilisation variables related to psoriasis, and explained higher proportion of EQ-5D variance than any previous findings in the literature.

Genetics of psoriasis and pharmacogenetics of biological drugs

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin. The causes of psoriasis are unknown, although family and twin studies have shown genetic factors to play a key role in its development. The many genes associated with psoriasis and the immune response include TNFα, IL23, and IL12. Advances in knowledge of the pathogenesis of psoriasis have enabled the development of new drugs that target cytokines (e.g., etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab, which target TNFα, and ustekinumab, which targets the p40 subunit of IL23 and IL12). These drugs have improved the safety and efficacy of treatment in comparison with previous therapies. However, not all patients respond equally to treatment, possibly owing to interindividual genetic variability. In this review, we describe the genes associated with psoriasis and the immune response, the biological drugs used to treat chronic severe plaque psoriasis, new drugs in phase II and III trials, and current knowledge on the implications of pharmacogenomics in predicting response to these treatments.