1
|
Buijs MAS, Haidari S, IJpma FFA, Hietbrink F, Govaert GAM. What can they expect? Decreased quality of life and increased postoperative complication rate in patients with a fracture-related infection. Injury 2024; 55:111425. [PMID: 38402709 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND By gaining insight into the Quality of Life (QoL) status and occurrence of complications, critical facets in the care for patients with Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) can be mitigated and measures can be taken to improve their outcome. Therefore, the aims of this study were to 1) determine the QoL in FRI patients in comparison to non-FRI patients and 2) describe the occurrence of other complications in both FRI and non-FRI patients. METHODS An ambidirectional cohort study was conducted in a level 1 trauma centre between January 1st 2016 and November 1st 2021. All patients who underwent surgical stabilisation of an isolated long bone fracture were eligible for inclusion. To avoid confounding, only patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) <16 were included. Data regarding patient demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment, follow-up and complications were collected of both non-FRI and FRI patients. QoL was assessed through the use of five-level EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires twelve months post-injury. RESULTS A total of 134 patients were included in this study, of whom 38 (28%) FRI patients and 96 (72%) non-FRI patients. In comparison to non-FRI patients, FRI patients scored significantly worse on the QoL assessment regarding the index value (p = 0.012) and the domains mobility (p<0.001), usual activities (p = 0.010) and pain/discomfort (p = 0.009). Other postoperative complications were more often reported (p<0.001) in FRI patients (66%, n = 25/38) compared to non-FRI patients (27%, n = 26/96). During the median follow-up of 14.5 months (interquartile range (IQR) 9.5-26.5), 25 FRI patients developed a total of 49 distinctive complications besides FRI. The complications nonunion (18%, n = 9/49), infection other than FRI (e.g. line infection, urinary tract infection, pneumonia) (18%, n = 9/49) and implant failure (14%, n = 7/49) were the most frequently described in the FRI group. CONCLUSION Patients who suffered from an FRI have a decreased QoL in comparison to those without an FRI. Moreover, patients with an FRI have a higher rate of additional complications. These findings can help in patient counselling regarding the potential physical and mental consequences of having a complicated course of recovery due to an infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A S Buijs
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - S Haidari
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - F F A IJpma
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - F Hietbrink
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G A M Govaert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xie S, Wu J, Chen G. Comparative performance and mapping algorithms between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among the Chinese general population. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:7-19. [PMID: 36709458 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01566-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the comparative performance and develop the mapping algorithms between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in China. METHODS Respondents recruited from the Chinese general population completed both EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 during face-to-face interviews. Ceiling/floor effects were reported. Discriminative validity in self-reported chronic conditions was investigated using the effect sizes (ES). Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots in a subsample. Correlation and absolute agreements between the two measures were estimated with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and ICC, respectively. Ordinary least squares (OLS), generalized linear model, Tobit model, and robust MM-estimator were explored to estimate mapping equations between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2. RESULTS 3320 respondents (50.3% males; age 18-90 years) were recruited. 51.1% and 12.2% of respondents reported no problems on all EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 dimensions, respectively. The mean EQ-5D-5L utility was higher than SF-6Dv2 (0.947 vs. 0.827, p < 0.001). Utilities were significantly different across all chronic conditions groups for both measures. The mean absolute difference of utilities between the two tests for EQ-5D-5L was smaller (0.033 vs. 0.043) than SF-6Dv2, with a slightly higher ICC (0.859 vs. 0.827). Fair agreement (ICC = 0.582) was observed in the utilities between the two measures. Mapping algorithms generated by the OLS models performed the best according to the goodness-of-fit indicators. CONCLUSIONS Both measures showed comparable discriminative validity. Systematic differences in utilities were found, and on average, the EQ-5D-5L generates higher values than the SF-6Dv2. Mapping algorithms between the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 are reported to enable transformations between these two measures in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shitong Xie
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jing Wu
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
| | - Gang Chen
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thompson NR, Lapin BR, Katzan IL. Utilities Estimated from PROMIS Scales for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in Stroke. Med Decis Making 2023; 43:704-718. [PMID: 37401739 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231182446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3) are preference-based measures used in cost-effectiveness studies. The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Preference scoring system (PROPr) is a new preference-based measure. In addition, algorithms were previously developed to map PROMIS Global Health (PROMIS-GH) items to HUI-3 using linear equating (HUILE) and 3-level EQ-5D using linear (EQ5DLE). We sought to evaluate and compare estimated utilities based on PROPr and PROMIS-GH in adult stroke survivors. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults diagnosed with 1 of ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage seen in an outpatient clinic between 2015 and 2019. Patients completed PROMIS scales and other measures. We computed a modified version of PROPr (mPROPr) and compared the distributional characteristics and correlations with stroke outcomes for mPROPr, HUILE, and EQ5DLE. RESULTS T toal of 4,159 stroke survivors (average age 62.7 ± 14.7 y, 48.4% female, 77.6% ischemic stroke) were included. Mean utility estimates for mPROPr, EQ5DLE, and HUILE were 0.333 ± 0.244, 0.739 ± 0.201, and 0.544 ± 0.301, respectively. Correlations between the modified Rankin Scale and each of mPROPr and HUILE were both -0.48 and -0.43 for EQ5DLE. Regression analyses indicated that mPROPr scores may be too low for stroke patients in good health and that EQ5DLE scores may be too high for stroke patients in poor health. CONCLUSIONS All 3 PROMIS-based utilities were associated with measures of stroke disability and severity, but the distributions of utilities were very different. Our study highlights the problem cost-effectiveness researchers face of valuing health states with certainty. For researchers using utilities estimated from PROMIS scales, our study indicates that mapping PROMIS-GH item scores to HUI-3 via linear equating may be most appropriate in stroke patients. HIGHLIGHTS A new preference-based measure has been developed from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), known as the PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) scoring system, and published equations mapping PROMIS Global Health (PROMIS-GH) items to the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3) and EQ-5D-3L are available for use in cost-effectiveness studies.Our study provides distributional characteristics and comparisons of utilities estimated using a modified version of PROPr and equations mapping PROMIS-GH items to EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3 in a sample of stroke survivors.The results of our study show large differences in the distributions of utilities estimated using the different health state measures, and these differences highlight the ongoing difficulty researchers face in valuing health states with certainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas R Thompson
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Brittany R Lapin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Irene L Katzan
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Snowdon DA, Srikanth V, Beare R, Noeske KE, Le E, O'Bree B, Andrew NE. Acceptability of the routine use and collection of a generic patient reported outcome measure from the perspective of healthcare staff: a qualitative study. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:81. [PMID: 37522943 PMCID: PMC10390450 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00617-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a measure of self-perceived health status or health-related quality of life. They have been used to support provider-patient decisions, healthcare delivery, and value-based healthcare models. A barrier to routine collection of PROMs is the perception that PROMs lack clinical utility. As such, it is important to establish clinicians' acceptability of the PROM prior to large-scale implementation. This study explored the acceptability of the routine use and collection of a generic PROM in healthcare services from the perspective of healthcare staff. METHODS Individual semi-structured interviews were completed from September 2020 to March 2021 with 26 staff from two multi-disciplinary community healthcare services in Melbourne, Australia. Interviews explored their experiences of using the EQ-5D-5L in their routine care. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed according to a framework approach, using inductive and deductive techniques. RESULTS Participants discussed the acceptability of the EQ-5D-5L with reference to four themes: practicalities of use; holistic nature; influence on client care; and influence on health service. Participants found the EQ-5D-5L quick and easy to administer, and appreciated that it measured multiple domains of health that were relevant to their clients' care. They believed the EQ-5D-5L helped to identify client problems, and inform service delivery. They also reported features that were less acceptable, including a lack of item specificity to some healthcare disciplines. Participants reported the challenge of managing conflict between their assessment of the client's health and the client's perspective of their own health, leading some to question whether the client could provide an accurate reflection of their own health. CONCLUSIONS The EQ-5D-5L has several features that healthcare staff viewed as acceptable for routine collection and use in healthcare. Training on the validity of the patient reported perspective and broadening the scope of PROMs collection beyond the EQ-5D-5L should be considered to facilitate large-scale implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Snowdon
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
| | - Velandai Srikanth
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Beare
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Developmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kate E Noeske
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Le
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Bridget O'Bree
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Nadine E Andrew
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Seow LSE, Lau JH, Abdin E, Verma SK, Tan KB, Subramaniam M. Mapping the schizophrenia quality of life scale to EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D utility scores in patients with schizophrenia. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:813-821. [PMID: 37216213 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2215430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The current study aimed to map the disease-specific Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS) onto the three- and five-level EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D-3 L and EQ-5D-5 L), Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and Short Form six-dimensional (SF-6D) preference-based instruments to inform future cost-utility analyses for treatment of patients with schizophrenia. METHODS Data from 251 outpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders was included for analysis. Ordinary least square (OLS), Tobit and beta regression mixture models were employed to estimate the utility scores. Three regression models with a total of 66 specifications were determined by goodness of fit and predictive indices. Distribution of the original data to the distributions of the data generated using the preferred estimated models were then compared. RESULTS EQ-5D-3 L and EQ-5D-5 L were best predicted by the OLS model, including SQLS domain scores, domain-squared scores, age, and gender as explanatory predictors. The models produced the best performance index and resembled most closely with the observed EQ-5D data. HUI3 and SF-6D were best predicted by the OLS and Tobit model respectively. CONCLUSION The current study developed mapping models for converting SQLS scores into generic utility scores, which can be used for economic evaluation among patients with schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jue Hua Lau
- Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | | | - Swapna K Verma
- Department of Psychosis, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ben ÂJ, Pellekooren S, Bosmans JE, Ostelo RWJG, Maas ET, El Alili M, van Tulder MW, Huygen FJPM, Oosterhuis T, Apeldoorn AT, van Hooff ML, van Dongen JM. Mapping Oswestry Disability Index Responses to EQ-5D-3L Utility Values: Are Cost-Utility Results Valid? VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:873-882. [PMID: 36773782 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and validate approaches for mapping Oswestry Disability Index responses to 3-level version of EQ-5D utility values and to evaluate the impact of using mapped utility values on cost-utility results compared with published regression models. METHODS Three response mapping approaches were developed in a random sample of 70% of 18 692 patients with low back pain: nonparametric approach (Non-p), nonparametric approach excluding logical inconsistencies (Non-peLI), and ordinal logistic regression (OLR). Performance was assessed in the remaining 30% using R-square (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). To evaluate whether MAEs and their 95% limits of agreement (LA) were clinically relevant, a minimally clinically important difference of 0.074 was used. Probabilities of cost-effectiveness estimated using observed and mapped utility values were compared in 2 economic evaluations. RESULTS The Non-p performed the best (R2 = 0.43; RMSE = 0.22; MAE = 0.03; 95% LA = -0.40 to 0.47) compared with the Non-peLI (R2 = 0.07; RMSE = 0.29; MAE = -0.15; 95% LA = -0.63 to 0.34) and OLR (R2 = 0.22; RMSE = 0.26; MAE = 0.02; 95% LA = -0.49 to 0.53). MAEs were lower than the minimally clinically important difference for the Non-p and OLR but not for the Non-peLI. Differences in probabilities of cost-effectiveness ranged from 1% to 4% (Non-p), 0.1% to 9% (Non-peLI), and 0.1% to 20% (OLR). CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that the developed response mapping approaches are not valid for estimating individual patients' 3-level version of EQ-5D utility values, and-depending on the approach-may considerably affect cost-utility results. The developed approaches did not perform better than previously published regression-based models and are therefore not recommended for use in economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ângela Jornada Ben
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sylvia Pellekooren
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral & Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith E Bosmans
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond W J G Ostelo
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther T Maas
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mohamed El Alili
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; National Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits W van Tulder
- Department Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral & Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Teddy Oosterhuis
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adri T Apeldoorn
- Rehabilitation Department, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands; Breederode Hogeschool, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Miranda L van Hooff
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M van Dongen
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wojciechowski P, Wdowiak M, Hakimi Z, Wilson K, Fishman J, Nazir J, Toumi M. Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-5L index for patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in France. J Comp Eff Res 2023; 12:e220178. [PMID: 37052120 PMCID: PMC10402747 DOI: 10.57264/cer-2022-0178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To map patient-level data collected on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC) QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-5L data for estimating health-state utilities in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). Materials & methods: European cross-sectional PNH patient survey data populated regression models mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 domains (covariates: sex and baseline age) to utilities calculated with the EQ-5D-5L French value set. A genetic algorithm allowed selection of the best-fitting between a set of models with and without interaction terms. We validated the selected algorithm using EQ-5D-5L utilities converted from EORTC QLQ-C30 data collected in the PEGASUS phase III, randomized controlled trial of pegcetacoplan versus eculizumab in adults with PNH. Results: Selected through the genetic algorithm, the ordinary least squares model without interactions provided highly stable results across study visits (mean [±SD] utilities 0.58 [±0.42] to 0.89 [±0.10]), and showed the best predictive validity. Conclusion: The new PNH EQ-5D-5L direct mapping developed using a genetic algorithm enabled calculation of reliable health-state utility data required for cost-utility analysis in health technology assessments supporting treatments of PNH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marlena Wdowiak
- Putnam Associates (formerly Creativ Ceutical), 30-701 Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Koo Wilson
- Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, 171 65 Solna, Sweden
| | - Jesse Fishman
- University Aix-Marseille, 13284 Marseille Cedex 07, France
| | - Jameel Nazir
- Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, 171 65 Solna, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oliveira Gonçalves AS, Werdin S, Kurth T, Panteli D. Mapping Studies to Estimate Health-State Utilities From Nonpreference-Based Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review on How Repeated Measurements are Taken Into Account. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:589-597. [PMID: 36371289 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.09.2477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mapping algorithms are developed using data sets containing patient responses to a preference-based questionnaire and another health-related quality-of-life questionnaire. When data sets include repeated measurements from the same individuals over time, the assumption of observations' independence, required by standard models, is violated, and standard errors are underestimated. This review aimed to identify how studies deal with methodological challenges of repeated measurements, provide an overview of practice to date, and potential implications for future work. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, specialized databases, and previous systematic reviews. A data template was used to extract, among others, start and target instruments if the data set(s) used for estimation and validation had repeated measurements per patient, used regression techniques, and which (if any) adjustments were made for repeated measurements. RESULTS We identified 278 publications developing at least 1 mapping algorithm. Of the 278 publications, 121 used a data set with repeated measurements, among which 92 used multiple time points for estimation, and 39 selected specific time points to have 1 observation per participant. A total of 36 studies did not account for repeated measurements. An adjustment was conducted using cluster-robust standard errors (21), random-effects models (30), generalized estimating equations (7), and other methods (7). CONCLUSIONS The inconsistent use of methods to account for interdependent observations in the literature indicates that mapping guidelines should include recommendations on how to deal with repeated measurements, and journals should update their guidelines accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sophia Werdin
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Kurth
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dimitra Panteli
- Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Webb EJD. An Item-Response Mapping from General Health Questionnaire Responses to EQ-5D-3L Using a General Population Sample from England. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:327-346. [PMID: 36372819 PMCID: PMC9660137 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-022-00767-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is widely used to measure mental health and well-being; however, it is not possible to estimate values on the full health = 1, dead = 0 scale used to construct quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from GHQ-12 responses as it is not preference-based. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to create an item-response mapping between GHQ-12 and EQ-5D-3L health states, for which several value sets exist. METHODS Data from the 2012 Health Survey for England with complete GHQ-12 and EQ-5D-3L descriptive system responses were used for analysis. Data were split 70/30 into estimation/test samples. Four modelling approaches, with EQ-5D-3L levels on each dimension as dependent variables and GHQ-12 responses as independent variables were assessed: non-parametric, simple ordered logit (OL), extended OL, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Approaches were assessed using Akaike and Bayesian information criteria, predictive accuracy measured using root mean squared error (RMSE), and simplicity. RESULTS A total of 8114 responses became 6924 after discarding missing values, with 4847 used in estimation and 2077 used for testing. LASSO had a better model fit on the pain/discomfort dimension, but no model had markedly superior predictive accuracy. The non-parametric approach was chosen for the mapping algorithm based on simplicity. Predicted and observed EQ-5D-3L values for the test sample had a correlation of 0.488. Prediction accuracy was better for GHQ-12 scores below 20 than scores above 20. CONCLUSION The mapping allows EQ-5D-3L responses to be predicted using GHQ-12 responses, which may be useful in estimating utility values and QALYs. An R script and Microsoft Excel spreadsheet are provided to facilitate calculations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J D Webb
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ayala A, Ramallo-Fariña Y, Bilbao-Gonzalez A, Forjaz MJ. Mapping the EQ-5D-5L from the Spanish national health survey functional disability scale through Bayesian networks. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:1785-1794. [PMID: 36735174 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03351-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preference-based measures are valuable tools for evaluating therapeutic interventions and for cost-effectiveness studies. Mapping procedures are useful when it is not possible to collect these kind of measures. The objective of this study was to evaluate which mapping method is the most appropriate to estimate the EQ-5D-5L index from the Spanish National Health Survey functional disability scale. METHODS The sample, formed by 5708 older adults (aged 65 years or older), was drawn from the Spanish National Health Survey ("Encuesta Nacional de Salud en España," ENSE in Spanish 2011-2012). The predictions of EQ-5D-5L index were performed with response mapping using Bayesian network (BN), ordered logit (Ologit), and multinomial logistic (ML). The following direct methods were used: ordinary least squares (OLS) and Tobit regression. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and root-mean squared error (RMSE) were calculated to compare all models. The predictions of response models were obtained through the expected value method. RESULTS BN model showed the highest ICC (0.756, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.733-0.777) and lowest MAE (0.110, 95% CI 0.104-0.115). OLS was the model with worse accuracy results with lowest ICC (0.621, 95% CI 0.553-0.681) and highest MAE (0.159, 95%CI: 0.145-0.173). CONCLUSION Indirect mapping methods (BN, Ologit, and ML) had a better accuracy than the direct methods. The response mapping approach provides a robust method to estimate EQ-5D-5L scores from the functional disability scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba Ayala
- Department of Statistics, School of Law and Social Sciences, University Carlos III of Madrid, 126-28903, Getafe, Madrid, Spain. .,Health Service Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain. .,Research Network on Chronic Diseases, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Yolanda Ramallo-Fariña
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain.,Health Service Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Research Network on Chronic Diseases, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Amaia Bilbao-Gonzalez
- Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basurto University Hospital, Research and Innovation Unit, Bilbao, Spain.,Kronikgune Institute for Health Services Research, Barakaldo, Spain.,Health Service Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Research Network on Chronic Diseases, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria João Forjaz
- National Epidemiology Centre, Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain.,Health Service Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Research Network on Chronic Diseases, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khairnar R, DeMora L, Sandler HM, Lee WR, Villalonga-Olives E, Mullins CD, Palumbo FB, Bruner DW, Shaya FT, Bentzen SM, Shah AB, Malone S, Michalski JM, Dayes IS, Seaward SA, Albert M, Currey AD, Pisansky TM, Chen Y, Horwitz EM, DeNittis AS, Feng F, Mishra MV. Methodological Comparison of Mapping the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite to EuroQoL-5D-3L Using Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data: Secondary Analysis of NRG/RTOG 0415. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2022; 6:e2100188. [PMID: 35776901 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the predictive ability of mapping algorithms derived using cross-sectional and longitudinal data. METHODS This methodological assessment used data from a randomized controlled noninferiority trial of patients with low-risk prostate cancer, conducted by NRG Oncology (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00331773), which examined the efficacy of conventional schedule versus hypofractionated radiation therapy (three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy/IMRT). Health-related quality-of-life data were collected using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), and health utilities were obtained using EuroQOL-5D-3L (EQ-5D) at baseline and 6, 12, 24, and 60 months postintervention. Mapping algorithms were estimated using ordinary least squares regression models through five-fold cross-validation in baseline cross-sectional data and combined longitudinal data from all assessment periods; random effects specifications were also estimated in longitudinal data. Predictive performance was compared using root mean square error. Longitudinal predictive ability of models obtained using baseline data was examined using mean absolute differences in the reported and predicted utilities. RESULTS A total of 267 (and 199) patients in the estimation sample had complete EQ-5D and EPIC domain (and subdomain) data at baseline and at all subsequent assessments. Ordinary least squares models using combined data showed better predictive ability (lowest root mean square error) in the validation phase for algorithms with EPIC domain/subdomain data alone, whereas models using baseline data outperformed other specifications in the validation phase when patient covariates were also modeled. The mean absolute differences were lower for models using EPIC subdomain data compared with EPIC domain data and generally decreased as the time of assessment increased. CONCLUSION Overall, mapping algorithms obtained using baseline cross-sectional data showed the best predictive performance. Furthermore, these models demonstrated satisfactory longitudinal predictive ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Khairnar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lyudmila DeMora
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Howard M Sandler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - W Robert Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Ester Villalonga-Olives
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD
| | - C Daniel Mullins
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD
| | - Francis B Palumbo
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Fadia T Shaya
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD
| | - Soren M Bentzen
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amit B Shah
- WellSpan Health-York Cancer Center, York, PA
| | - Shawn Malone
- Ottawa Hospital and Cancer Center, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeff M Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO
| | - Ian S Dayes
- Juravinski Cancer Center at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Adam D Currey
- Zablocki VAMC and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Thomas M Pisansky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
| | - Yuhchyau Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Eric M Horwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Felix Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mark V Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bulamu NB, Vissapragada R, Chen G, Ratcliffe J, Mudge LA, Smithers BM, Isenring EA, Smith L, Jamieson GG, Watson DI. Responsiveness and convergent validity of QLU-C10D and EQ-5D-3L in assessing short-term quality of life following esophagectomy. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:233. [PMID: 34600554 PMCID: PMC8487554 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01867-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim This study assessed the responsiveness and convergent validity of two preference-based measures; the newly developed cancer-specific EORTC Quality of Life Utility Measure-Core 10 dimensions (QLU-C10D) relative to the generic three-level version of the EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D-3L) in evaluating short-term health related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes after esophagectomy. Methods Participants were enrolled in a multicentre randomised controlled trial to determine the impact of preoperative and postoperative immunonutrition versus standard nutrition in patients with esophageal cancer. HRQoL was assessed seven days before and 42 days after esophagectomy. Standardized Response Mean and Effect Size were calculated to assess responsiveness. Ceiling effects for each dimension were calculated as the proportion of the best level responses for that dimension at follow-up/post-operatively. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman’s correlation and the level of agreement was explored using Bland–Altman plots. Results Data from 164 respondents (mean age: 63 years, 81% male) were analysed. HRQoL significantly reduced on both measures with large effect sizes (> 0.80), and a greater mean difference (0.29 compared to 0.16) on QLU-C10D. Both measures had ceiling effects (> 15%) on all dimensions at baseline. Following esophagectomy, ceiling effects were observed with self-care (86%), mobility (67%), anxiety/depression (55%) and pain/discomfort (19%) dimensions on EQ-5D-3L. For QLU-C10D ceiling effects were observed with emotional function (53%), physical function (16%), nausea (35%), sleep (31%), bowel problems (21%) and pain (20%). A strong correlation (r = 0.71) was observed between EQ-5D-3L anxiety and QLU-C10D emotional function dimensions. Good agreement (3.7% observations outside the limits of agreement) was observed between the utility scores. Conclusion The QLU-C10D is comparable to the more widely applied generic EQ-5D-3L, however, QLU-C10D was more sensitive to short-term utility changes following esophagectomy. Cognisant of requirements by policy makers to apply generic utility measures in cost effectiveness studies, the disease-specific QLU-C10D should be used alongside the generic measures like EQ-5D-3L. Trial registration: The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12611000178943) on the 15th of February 2011. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-021-01867-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norma B Bulamu
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ravi Vissapragada
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gang Chen
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Louise A Mudge
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - B Mark Smithers
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Academy of Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Lorelle Smith
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Glyn G Jamieson
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - David I Watson
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. .,Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Putman S, Preda C, Girard J, Duhamel A, Migaud H. Mapping and Crosswalk of the Oxford Hip Score and Different Versions of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:1534-1544. [PMID: 34128911 PMCID: PMC8208448 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures such as the Oxford-12 Hip Score and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) are used in daily orthopaedic practice to evaluate patients. Because different studies use different scores, it would be important to build conversion tables between scores (crosswalk) to compare the results of one study with those of another study. Various mapping methods can be used to develop crosswalk tables that convert Oxford-12 scores to the HOOS (and its derivatives, including the HOOS physical function short form, HOOS joint replacement, and HOOS-12) and vice versa. Although prior studies have investigated this issue, they are limited to short forms of the HOOS score. Consequently, they cannot be applied to hip preservation surgery and do not include quality-of-life items, whereas the Oxford-12 Hip Score is used for all hip evaluations. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We prospectively studied the Oxford-12 and HOOS and its derivatives to (1) determine which version of the HOOS has the best mapping with the Oxford-12, (2) define the most-appropriate mapping method using selected indicators, and (3) generate crosswalk tables between these two patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS The study enrolled 500 adult patients before primary THA (59% men [294 of 500 patients]) with hip osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis of the femoral head who completed the HOOS and Oxford-12. Patients were recruited from January 2018 to September 2019 in a tertiary-care university hospital, and we included all primary THAs in patients older than 18 years with a BMI lower than 35 kg/m2 and greater than 18 kg/m2. After a minimum of 6 months of follow-up, 39% (195 of 500) of the patients were assessed using the same tools. To determine which version of the HOOS mapped best to the Oxford-12 and what the most-appropriate mapping method was, we used preoperative data from all 500 patients. Because there is no consensus on the method to establish crosswalk, various mapping methods (linear regression, tobit regression, and quantile regression) and equating methods (linear equating and equipercentile method) were applied along with cross-validation to determine which method was the most suitable and which form of the HOOS provided the best result according to different criteria (mean absolute error, r2, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance).To generate crosswalk tables, we created a conversion table (between the Oxford-12 and the HOOS form that was chosen after answering our first research question and the method chosen after answering our second question) using preoperative and postoperative data (n = 695). This table was meant to be simple to use and allows easy conversions from one scoring system to another. RESULTS The Oxford-12 and HOOS were strongly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient range 0.586-0.842) for the HOOS subcategories and HOOS physical function, HOOS joint replacement, and HOOS-12. The correlation between the HOOS-12 and Oxford-12 was the strongest (r = 0.825). According to the three different criteria and five methods, the HOOS-12 was the best suited for mapping. The goal was to minimize the mean absolute error (perfect model = 0), have a Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance as close as possible to 0, and have the r2 as close as possible to 1. Regarding the most-suitable method for the crosswalk mapping (research question 2), the five methods generated similar results for the r2 (range 0.63-0.67) and mean absolute error (range 6-6.2). For the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance, the equipercentile method was the best (Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance 0.04), with distance reduced by 43% relative to the regression methods (Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance 0.07). A graphical comparison of the predicted and observed scores showed that the equipercentile method provided perfect superposition of predicted and observed values after mapping. Finally, crosswalk tables were produced between the HOOS-12 and Oxford-12. CONCLUSION The HOOS-12 is the most complete and suitable form of the HOOS for mapping with the Oxford-12, while the equipercentile method is the most suitable for predicting values after mapping. This study provides clinicians with a reliable tool to crosswalk between these scores not only for joint arthroplasty but also for all types of hip surgeries while also assessing quality of life. Our findings should be confirmed in additional studies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The resulting crosswalk tables can be used in meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or clinical practice to compare clinical studies that did not include both outcome scores. In addition, with these tools, the clinician can collect only one score while still being able to compare his or her results with those obtained in other databases and registries, and to add his or her results to other databases and joint registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Putman
- Orthopedics Department, Lille University Hospital Lille, Hôpital Salengro, Lille, France
- University of Lille, Lille, France
- ULR2694 – METRICS: évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, University of Lille, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
- Department of Biostatistics, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Cristian Preda
- Laboratory of Mathematics Paul Painlevé, Unité Mixte de Recherche, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, University of Lille, Lille, France
- Biostatistic Department, Delegation for Clinical Research and Innovation, Lille Catholic Hospitals, Lille Catholic University, Lille, France
| | - Julien Girard
- Orthopedics Department, Lille University Hospital Lille, Hôpital Salengro, Lille, France
- University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Alain Duhamel
- ULR2694 – METRICS: évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, University of Lille, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
- Department of Biostatistics, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Henri Migaud
- Orthopedics Department, Lille University Hospital Lille, Hôpital Salengro, Lille, France
- University of Lille, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ayala A, Forjaz MJ, Ramallo-Fariña Y, Martín-Fernández J, García-Pérez L, Bilbao A. Response Mapping Methods to Estimate the EQ-5D-5L From the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis in Patients With Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:874-883. [PMID: 34119086 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The mapping technique can estimate generic preference-based measure scores through a specific measure that cannot be used in economic evaluations. This study compared 2 response mapping methods to estimate EQ-5D-5L scores using the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC). METHODS The sample consisted of 758 patients with the hip or knee osteoarthritis recruited in baseline. Bayesian networks (BN) and multinomial logistic regression (ML) were used as response mapping models. Predictions were obtained using the 6-month follow-up as a validation sample. The mean absolute error, mean squared error, deviation from the root mean squared error and intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated as precision measures. RESULTS There was 5.5% of missing data, which was removed. The mean age was 69.6 years (standard deviation = 10.5), with 61.6% of women. The BN model presented lower mean absolute error, mean squared error, root mean squared error and higher intraclass correlation coefficient than the ML model. Only the WOMAC items pain and physical function items were related with the EQ-5D-5L dimensions. CONCLUSION BN response mapping models are more robust methods, with better prediction results, than ML models. The BN model also provided a graphic representation of the dependency relationships between the EQ-5D-5L dimensions and the different WOMAC items that could be useful in the clinical investigation of patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba Ayala
- University Carlos III of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Health Service Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC).
| | - Maria João Forjaz
- National Epidemiology Centre, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Health Service Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC)
| | - Yolanda Ramallo-Fariña
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain; Health Service Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC)
| | - Jesús Martín-Fernández
- Oeste Multiprofessional Teaching Unit of Primary and Community Care, Primary Healthcare Management, Madrid Health Service, Madrid, Spain; Health Service Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC)
| | - Lidia García-Pérez
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain; Health Service Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC)
| | - Amaia Bilbao
- Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basurto University Hospital, Research Unit, Bilbao, Spain; Health Service Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC); Kronikgune Institute for Health Services Research, Barakaldo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Current Status of Research on the Mapping Function of Health Utility Values in the Asia Pacific Region: A Systematic Review. Value Health Reg Issues 2021; 24:224-239. [PMID: 33894684 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic review aimed to analyze the published studies on the use of the mapping method between generic scales and disease-specific scales as well as between 2 universal scales. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, CNKI, Weipa Database, Wanfang Database, and HERC Database to collect articles about the application of the mapping method to the measurement of health utility value from January 2000 to December 2019. RESULTS Overall, 59 articles met the inclusion requirements, and most of them were a mapping study between a disease-specific scale and a generic scale. Then all these articles were classified by the following study types: a clear functional relationship; unclear functional relationship; disease-specific scale and universality; mapping between generic scales and disease-specific scales, and mapping between universal scales. Most studies derived the best mapping model from the ordinary least squares regression, and fewer studies chose to use new regression methods. Sample sizes in the retrieved studies generally affected the reliability of the study results. CONCLUSIONS In recent years, as more attention has been paid to the research of the mapping method, a large number of problems have followed, such as the selection of scale types, the coverage of the study sample, and the selection of evaluation index of model performance and sample size. It is hoped that these problems can be properly solved in the future research.
Collapse
|
16
|
Khairnar R, Pugh SL, Sandler HM, Lee WR, Villalonga Olives E, Mullins CD, Palumbo FB, Bruner DW, Shaya FT, Bentzen SM, Shah AB, Malone SC, Michalski JM, Dayes IS, Seaward SA, Albert M, Currey AD, Pisansky TM, Chen Y, Horwitz EM, DeNittis AS, Feng FY, Mishra MV. Mapping expanded prostate cancer index composite to EQ5D utilities to inform economic evaluations in prostate cancer: Secondary analysis of NRG/RTOG 0415. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0249123. [PMID: 33852571 PMCID: PMC8046237 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) is the most commonly used patient reported outcome (PRO) tool in prostate cancer (PC) clinical trials, but health utilities associated with the different health states assessed with this tool are unknown, limiting our ability to perform cost-utility analyses. This study aimed to map EPIC tool to EuroQoL-5D-3L (EQ5D) to generate EQ5D health utilities. METHODS AND MATERIALS This is a secondary analysis of a prospective, randomized non-inferiority clinical trial, conducted between 04/2006 and 12/2009 at cancer centers across the United States, Canada, and Switzerland. Eligible patients included men >18 years with a known diagnosis of low-risk PC. Patient HRQoL data were collected using EPIC and health utilities were obtained using EQ5D. Data were divided into an estimation sample (n = 765, 70%) and a validation sample (n = 327, 30%). The mapping algorithms that capture the relationship between the instruments were estimated using ordinary least squares (OLS), Tobit, and two-part models. Five-fold cross-validation (in-sample) was used to compare the predictive performance of the estimated models. Final models were selected based on root mean square error (RMSE). RESULTS A total of 565 patients in the estimation sample had complete information on both EPIC and EQ5D questionnaires at baseline. Mean observed EQ5D utility was 0.90±0.13 (range: 0.28-1) with 55% of patients in full health. OLS models outperformed their counterpart Tobit and two-part models for all pre-determined model specifications. The best model fit was: "EQ5D utility = 0.248541 + 0.000748*(Urinary Function) + 0.001134*(Urinary Bother) + 0.000968*(Hormonal Function) + 0.004404*(Hormonal Bother)- 0.376487*(Zubrod) + 0.003562*(Urinary Function*Zubrod)"; RMSE was 0.10462. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to identify a comprehensive set of mapping algorithms to generate EQ5D utilities from EPIC domain/ sub-domain scores. The study results will help estimate quality-adjusted life-years in PC economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Khairnar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Stephanie L. Pugh
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Howard M. Sandler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - W. Robert Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Ester Villalonga Olives
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - C. Daniel Mullins
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Francis B. Palumbo
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Deborah W. Bruner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Fadia T. Shaya
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Soren M. Bentzen
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Amit B. Shah
- WellSpan Health-York Cancer Center, York, PA, United States of America
| | | | - Jeff M. Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Ian S. Dayes
- Juravinski Cancer Center at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Samantha A. Seaward
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States of America
| | - Michele Albert
- Saint Anne’s Hospital, Fall River, MA, United States of America
| | - Adam D. Currey
- Zablocki VAMC and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America
| | - Thomas M. Pisansky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Yuhchyau Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Eric M. Horwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Albert S. DeNittis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Main Line Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Mark V. Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tang S, Gong Y, Liu M, Yang D, Tang K. Do Drug Accessibility and OOP Burden Affect Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients With Chronic Diseases? - EQ-5D-5L Evaluation Evidence From Five Districts in China. Front Public Health 2021; 9:656104. [PMID: 33791272 PMCID: PMC8006263 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.656104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The dependence of patients with chronic diseases on drugs may affect their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aims to assess the relationship between the direct economic burden caused by out-of-pocket (OOP) payments, drug accessibility, sociodemographic characteristics, and health-related quality of life. Methods: 1,055 patients with chronic diseases from Gansu, Hebei, Sichuan, Zhejiang, and Tianjin were investigated. Data collection included basic conditions and economic and health insurance conditions of patients with chronic diseases. The CLAD and Tobit regression models were used to analyze and compare the health-related quality of life and influencing factors of patients with chronic diseases in five districts. Differentiated analysis was conducted through sub-sample regression to explore the variable health effects of patients with single and multiple diseases. Results: A total of 1,055 patients with chronic diseases participated in the study, 54.4% of whom were women. The overall average utility score was 0.727, of which Sichuan Province was the highest with 0.751. Participants reported the highest proportion of pain/discomfort problems, while patients reported the least problems with self-care. The improvement of drug accessibility and the reduction of the burden of out-of-pocket expenses have significant positive effects on HRQoL. Various sociodemographic factors such as age and gender also have significant impact on HRQoL of patients with chronic diseases. HRQoL of patients with multiple chronic diseases is more affected by various influencing factors than that of patients with single disease. Conclusion: In order to improve the quality of life of patients with chronic diseases, it is of great importance to ensure the accessibility of drugs and reduce patients' medication burden. Future focus should shift from preventing and controlling chronic diseases as individual diseases to meeting the comprehensive health needs of people suffering from multiple diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaoliang Tang
- School of Health Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Ying Gong
- School of Health Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Meixian Liu
- School of Health Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Duoer Yang
- Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Kean Tang
- Faculty of Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Klapproth CP, van Bebber J, Sidey-Gibbons CJ, Valderas JM, Leplege A, Rose M, Fischer F. Predicting EQ-5D-5L crosswalk from the PROMIS-29 profile for the United Kingdom, France, and Germany. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:389. [PMID: 33334351 PMCID: PMC7745375 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01629-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background EQ-5D health state utilities (HSU) are commonly used in health economics to compute quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The EQ-5D, which is country-specific, can be derived directly or by mapping from self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scales such as the PROMIS-29 profile. The PROMIS-29 from the Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information System is a comprehensive assessment of self-reported health with excellent psychometric properties. We sought to find optimal models predicting the EQ-5D-5L crosswalk from the PROMIS-29 in the United Kingdom, France, and Germany and compared the prediction performances with that of a US model. Methods We collected EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-29 profiles and three samples representative of the general populations in the UK (n = 1509), France (n = 1501), and Germany (n = 1502). We used stepwise regression with backward selection to find the best models to predict the EQ-5D-5L crosswalk from all seven PROMIS-29 domains. We investigated the agreement between the observed and predicted EQ-5D-5L crosswalk in all three countries using various indices for the prediction performance, including Bland–Altman plots to examine the performance along the HSU continuum. Results The EQ-5D-5L crosswalk was best predicted in France (nRMSEFRA = 0.075, nMAEFRA = 0.052), followed by the UK (nRMSEUK = 0.076, nMAEUK = 0.053) and Germany (nRMSEGER = 0.079, nMAEGER = 0.051). The Bland–Altman plots show that the inclusion of higher-order effects reduced the overprediction of low HSU scores. Conclusions Our models provide a valid method to predict the EQ-5D-5L crosswalk from the PROMIS-29 for the UK, France, and Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Paul Klapproth
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - J van Bebber
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - C J Sidey-Gibbons
- Department of Symptom Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J M Valderas
- Health Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.,NIHR Peninsula Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, Exeter, UK
| | - A Leplege
- APEMAC, EA 4360, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.,Département d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences, Laboratoire SPHERE, UMR 7219, CNRS-Université Paris Diderot - Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - M Rose
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA
| | - F Fischer
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ameri H, Yousefi M, Yaseri M, Nahvijou A, Arab M, Akbari Sari A. Mapping EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 onto EQ-5D-5L in Colorectal Cancer Patients. J Gastrointest Cancer 2020; 51:196-203. [PMID: 30977049 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-019-00229-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-level utility data are needed for cost-utility analysis; in oncology, however, the data are commonly gathered using disease-specific questionnaires that are often not appropriate. Present study aimed to derive an algorithm which can map the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scales and the Colorectal Cancer-Specific Quality Of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CR29) scales onto the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) values in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS Using the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) model, a cross-sectional dataset of 252 patients with CRC were gathered from three academic centers of cancer treatment in Tehran in 2017. The predicted R2 (Pred R2) and adjusted R2 (Adj R2) are used to evaluate model goodness of fit. Additionally, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Spearman's correlation coefficients (ρ), and intraclass correlation (ICC) are applied to assess predictive ability of models. The tenfold cross-validation procedure was applied for validation models. RESULTS According to the results of our study, the model C4 from EORTC QLQ-C30 was the best predictive model (Pred R2 = 66.57%, Adj R2 = 67.67%, RMSE = 0.10173, MAE = 0.07840). Also, the model R4 from QLQ-CR29 performed the best for EQ-5D-5L (Adj R2 = 48.42%, Pred R2 = 45.54%, MAE = 0.10051, RMSE = 0.12997). CONCLUSIONS The mapping algorithm successfully mapped the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 scales onto the EQ-5D-5L values; therefore, it enables policymakers to convert cancer-specific questionnaires scores to the preference-based scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hosein Ameri
- Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahmood Yousefi
- Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Health Economics Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mehdi Yaseri
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Azin Nahvijou
- Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Arab
- Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Akbari Sari
- Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Price A, Smith J, Dakin H, Kang S, Eibich P, Cook J, Gray A, Harris K, Middleton R, Gibbons E, Benedetto E, Smith S, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Sayers A, Miller L, Marques E, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Judge A, Arden N, Murray D, Glyn-Jones S, Barker K, Carr A, Beard D. The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine tool to select candidates for hip and knee replacement surgery: development and economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-216. [PMID: 31287051 DOI: 10.3310/hta23320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no good evidence to support the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in setting preoperative thresholds for referral for hip and knee replacement surgery. Despite this, the practice is widespread in the NHS. OBJECTIVES/RESEARCH QUESTIONS Can clinical outcome tools be used to set thresholds for hip or knee replacement? What is the relationship between the choice of threshold and the cost-effectiveness of surgery? METHODS A systematic review identified PROMs used to assess patients undergoing hip/knee replacement. Their measurement properties were compared and supplemented by analysis of existing data sets. For each candidate score, we calculated the absolute threshold (a preoperative level above which there is no potential for improvement) and relative thresholds (preoperative levels above which individuals are less likely to improve than others). Owing to their measurement properties and the availability of data from their current widespread use in the NHS, the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were selected as the most appropriate scores to use in developing the Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine (ACHE) tool. The change in score and the probability of an improvement were then calculated and modelled using preoperative and postoperative OKS/OHSs and PROM scores, thereby creating the ACHE tool. Markov models were used to assess the cost-effectiveness of total hip/knee arthroplasty in the NHS for different preoperative values of OKS/OHSs over a 10-year period. The threshold values were used to model how the ACHE tool may change the number of referrals in a single UK musculoskeletal hub. A user group was established that included patients, members of the public and health-care representatives, to provide stakeholder feedback throughout the research process. RESULTS From a shortlist of four scores, the OHS and OKS were selected for the ACHE tool based on their measurement properties, calculated preoperative thresholds and cost-effectiveness data. The absolute threshold was 40 for the OHS and 41 for the OKS using the preferred improvement criterion. A range of relative thresholds were calculated based on the relationship between a patient's preoperative score and their probability of improving after surgery. For example, a preoperative OHS of 35 or an OKS of 30 translates to a 75% probability of achieving a good outcome from surgical intervention. The economic evaluation demonstrated that hip and knee arthroplasty cost of < £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year for patients with any preoperative score below the absolute thresholds (40 for the OHS and 41 for the OKS). Arthroplasty was most cost-effective for patients with lower preoperative scores. LIMITATIONS The ACHE tool supports but does not replace the shared decision-making process required before an individual decides whether or not to undergo surgery. CONCLUSION The OHS and OKS can be used in the ACHE tool to assess an individual patient's suitability for hip/knee replacement surgery. The system enables evidence-based and informed threshold setting in accordance with local resources and policies. At a population level, both hip and knee arthroplasty are highly cost-effective right up to the absolute threshold for intervention. Our stakeholder user group felt that the ACHE tool was a useful evidence-based clinical tool to aid referrals and that it should be trialled in NHS clinical practice to establish its feasibility. FUTURE WORK Future work could include (1) a real-world study of the ACHE tool to determine its acceptability to patients and general practitioners and (2) a study of the role of the ACHE tool in supporting referral decisions. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Price
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James Smith
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Helen Dakin
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sujin Kang
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Eibich
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jonathan Cook
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alastair Gray
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kristina Harris
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert Middleton
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elizabeth Gibbons
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elena Benedetto
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stephanie Smith
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jill Dawson
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Adrian Sayers
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura Miller
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Elsa Marques
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Ashley Blom
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew Judge
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nigel Arden
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Murray
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sion Glyn-Jones
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karen Barker
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Carr
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Varley-Campbell J, Mújica-Mota R, Coelho H, Ocean N, Barnish M, Packman D, Dodman S, Cooper C, Snowsill T, Kay T, Liversedge N, Parr M, Knight L, Hyde C, Shennan A, Hoyle M. Three biomarker tests to help diagnose preterm labour: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-226. [PMID: 30917097 DOI: 10.3310/hta23130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preterm birth may result in short- and long-term health problems for the child. Accurate diagnoses of preterm births could prevent unnecessary (or ensure appropriate) admissions into hospitals or transfers to specialist units. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this report is to assess the test accuracy, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the diagnostic tests PartoSure™ (Parsagen Diagnostics Inc., Boston, MA, USA), Actim® Partus (Medix Biochemica, Espoo, Finland) and the Rapid Fetal Fibronectin (fFN)® 10Q Cassette Kit (Hologic, Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA) at thresholds ≠50 ng/ml [quantitative fFN (qfFN)] for women presenting with signs and symptoms of preterm labour relative to fFN at 50 ng/ml. METHODS Systematic reviews of the published literature were conducted for diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies of PartoSure, Actim Partus and qfFN for predicting preterm birth, the clinical effectiveness following treatment decisions informed by test results and economic evaluations of the tests. A model-based economic evaluation was also conducted to extrapolate long-term outcomes from the results of the diagnostic tests. The model followed the structure of the model that informed the 2015 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines on preterm labour diagnosis and treatment, but with antenatal steroids use, as opposed to tocolysis, driving health outcomes. RESULTS Twenty studies were identified evaluating DTA against the reference standard of delivery within 7 days and seven studies were identified evaluating DTA against the reference standard of delivery within 48 hours. Two studies assessed two of the index tests within the same population. One study demonstrated that depending on the threshold used, qfFN was more or less accurate than Actim Partus, whereas the other indicated little difference between PartoSure and Actim Partus. No study assessing qfFN and PartoSure in the same population was identified. The test accuracy results from the other included studies revealed a high level of uncertainty, primarily attributable to substantial methodological, clinical and statistical heterogeneity between studies. No study compared all three tests simultaneously. No clinical effectiveness studies evaluating any of the three biomarker tests were identified. One partial economic evaluation was identified for predicting preterm birth. It assessed the number needed to treat to prevent a respiratory distress syndrome case with a 'treat-all' strategy, relative to testing with qualitative fFN. Because of the lack of data, our de novo model involved the assumption that management of pregnant women fully adhered to the results of the tests. In the base-case analysis for a woman at 30 weeks' gestation, Actim Partus had lower health-care costs and fewer quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than qfFN at 50 ng/ml, reducing costs at a rate of £56,030 per QALY lost compared with qfFN at 50 ng/ml. PartoSure is less costly than Actim Partus while being equally effective, but this is based on diagnostic accuracy data from a small study. Treatment with qfFN at 200 ng/ml and 500 ng/ml resulted in lower cost savings per QALY lost relative to fFN at 50 ng/ml than treatment with Actim Partus. In contrast, qfFN at 10 ng/ml increased QALYs, by 0.002, and had a cost per QALY gained of £140,267 relative to fFN at 50 ng/ml. Similar qualitative results were obtained for women presenting at different gestational ages. CONCLUSION There is a high degree of uncertainty surrounding the test accuracy and cost-effectiveness results. We are aware of four ongoing UK trials, two of which plan to enrol > 1000 participants. The results of these trials may significantly alter the findings presented here. STUDY REGISTRATION The study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017072696. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Varley-Campbell
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rubén Mújica-Mota
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Helen Coelho
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Neel Ocean
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Max Barnish
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - David Packman
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Sophie Dodman
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Cooper
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tristan Snowsill
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.,Health Economics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tracey Kay
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Michelle Parr
- Central Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lisa Knight
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Hyde
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Andrew Shennan
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.,Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Martin Hoyle
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Martín-Fernández J, Morey-Montalvo M, Tomás-García N, Martín-Ramos E, Muñoz-García JC, Polentinos-Castro E, Rodríguez-Martínez G, Arenaza JC, García-Pérez L, Magdalena-Armas L, Bilbao A. Mapping analysis to predict EQ-5D-5 L utility values based on the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaires in the Spanish population suffering from lower limb osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:184. [PMID: 32539838 PMCID: PMC7296624 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01435-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EQ-5D-5 L is a quality-of-life questionnaire based on individuals' preferences that is widely employed for cost-effectiveness analysis. Given the current demand for mapping algorithms to directly assign "utilities", this study aimed to generate different mapping models for predicting EQ-5D-5 L utility values based on scores of the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaires provided by patients suffering from hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA), respectively, and to assess the predictive capability of these functions. METHODS This was a prospective, observational study. Following the criteria of the American Rheumatism Association, 361 patients with hip OA and 397 with knee OA from three regions in Spain were included. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed through the EQ-5D-5 L general questionnaire and the OHS and OKS specifically for lower limb OA. Based on the scores on the OHS and OKS questionnaires, EQ-5D-5 L utilities were estimated using 4 models: ordinary least squares (OLS), Tobit, generalized linear model (GLM), and beta regression (Breg). The models were validated on the same patients after 6 months: the mean absolute error (MAE) and mean squared error (MSE) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI), mean values of standard errors (SE), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman plots were obtained. RESULTS The lowest MAEs were obtained using GLM and Breg models, with values of 0.1103 (0.0993-0.1214) and 0.1229 (0.1102-0.1335) for hip OA, and values of 0.1127 (0.1014-0.1239) and 0.1141 (0.1031-0.1251) for knee OA. MSE values were also lower using GLM and Breg. ICCs between predicted and observed values were around or over the 0.8 cut-off point. Bland-Altman plots showed an acceptable correlation, but precision was lower for subjects with worse HRQoL, which was also evident when comparing MAEs of the bottom and top halves of the utilities scale. Predictive equations for utilities based on OHS/OKS scores were proposed. CONCLUSIONS The OHS and OKS scores allow for estimating EQ-5D-5 L utility indexes for patients with hip and knee OA, respectively, with adequate validity and precision. GLM and Breg produce the best predictions. The predictive power of proposed equations is more consistent for subjects in better health condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús Martín-Fernández
- Unidad Docente Multiprofesional de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria Oeste, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain. .,Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain. .,Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Mariel Morey-Montalvo
- Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Gerencia Asistencial Atención Primaria, Madrid, Spain.,Dirección General de Salud Pública, Consejería de Sanidad Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Programa de doctorado Epidemiologia y Salud Publica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nuria Tomás-García
- C.S. San Martín de Valdeiglesias, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, San Martín de Valdeiglesias, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Martín-Ramos
- C.S. Alcalde Bartolomé González, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Muñoz-García
- C.S. El Soto. Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Polentinos-Castro
- Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Unidad Docente Multiprofesional de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria Norte, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gemma Rodríguez-Martínez
- C.S. Infante Don Luis, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Arenaza
- Osakidetza, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain.,Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Lidia García-Pérez
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.,Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), El Rosario, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Laura Magdalena-Armas
- Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, El Rosario, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Amaia Bilbao
- Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Osakidetza, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación en Servicios de Salud Kronikgune, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Trépel D, Ali S, Gilbody S, Leiva A, Mcmillan D, Bejarano F, Sempere E, Vicens C. Cost-effectiveness of brief structured interventions to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use: an economic analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial. HRB Open Res 2020; 3:33. [PMID: 32743341 PMCID: PMC7372528 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13049.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In Spain, long-term use of benzodiazepine is prevalent in 7% of the population; however, this longer-term use lacks clinical benefits, costs €90million per year and side-effects further add extra cost through adverse health outcomes. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of primary care services stepped dose reduction of long-term benzodiazepines using either Structured Interview with Follow-up (SIF) or Without Follow-up (SIW), compared to Treatment as Usual (TAU). Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside randomised control utilizing data from three arm cluster randomized trial. Setting: Primary care. Participants: 75 general practitioners were randomised to one of the three arms (TAU, SIW, SIF). Measurements: Cost and Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) Results: Compared to usual care, providing SIW per participant costs an additional €117.94 and adding patient follow-up, €218.4. As a result of intervention, participants showed a gain of, on average, for SIW 0.0144 QALY (95% CI -0.0137 to 0.0425) and for SIF 0.0340 QALYs (0.0069 to 0.0612). The Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio was €8190.28/QALY (SIW) and €6423.53/QALY (SIF). At the Spanish reimbursement threshold (€45,000 per QALY) the chance interventions are cost effective is 79.8% for SIW and 97.7% for SIF. Conclusions: Brief structured interventions to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use represent value for money, particularly with scheduled follow-up appointments, and would represent a cost-effective investment by the Spanish healthcare to reduce prevalence of long-term use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic Trépel
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D02 PN40, Ireland
- Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D02 PN40, Ireland
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Shehzad Ali
- Mental Health and Additions Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK, Heslington, York,, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Mental Health and Additions Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK, Heslington, York,, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Alfonso Leiva
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Palma, Palma, 07120, Spain
| | - Dean Mcmillan
- Mental Health and Additions Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK, Heslington, York,, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Ferran Bejarano
- Institut Català de la Salut, DAP Camp de Tarragona, Catalunya, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Ermengol Sempere
- Conselleria de Sanitat Universal i Salut Pública, Paterna Health Care Centre, Valencia, 46010, Spain
| | - Caterina Vicens
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Palma, Palma, 07120, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Meregaglia M, Whittal A, Nicod E, Drummond M. 'Mapping' Health State Utility Values from Non-preference-Based Measures: A Systematic Literature Review in Rare Diseases. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2020; 38:557-574. [PMID: 32152892 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00897-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to monitor the effects of disease and treatment on patient symptomatology and daily life is increasing in rare diseases (RDs) (i.e. those affecting less than one in 2000 people); however, these instruments seldom yield health state utility values (HSUVs) for cost-utility analyses. In such a context, 'mapping' allows HSUVs to be obtained by establishing a statistical relationship between a 'source' (e.g. a disease-specific PROM) and a 'target' preference-based measure [e.g. the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) tool]. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to systematically review all published studies using 'mapping' to derive HSUVs from non-preference-based measures in RDs, and identify any critical issues related to the main features of RDs, which are characterised by small, heterogeneous, and geographically dispersed patient populations. METHODS The following databases were searched during the first half of 2019 without time, study design, or language restrictions: MEDLINE (via PubMed), the School of Health and Related Research Health Utility Database (ScHARRHUD), and the Health Economics Research Centre (HERC) database of mapping studies (version 7.0). The keywords combined terms related to 'mapping' with Orphanet's list of RD indications (e.g. 'acromegaly') in addition to 'rare' and 'orphan'. 'Very rare' diseases (i.e. those with fewer than 1000 cases or families documented in the medical literature) were excluded from the searches. A predefined, pilot-tested extraction template (in Excel®) was used to collect structured information from the studies. RESULTS Two groups of studies were identified in the review. The first group (n = 19) developed novel mapping algorithms in 13 different RDs. As a target measure, the majority used EQ-5D, and the others used the Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) and 15D; most studies adopted ordinary least squares (OLS) regression. The second group of studies (n = 9) applied previously published algorithms in non-RDs to comparable RDs, mainly in the field of cancer. The critical issues relating to 'mapping' in RDs included the availability of very few studies, the relatively high number of cancer studies, and the absence of research in paediatric RDs. Moreover, the reviewed studies recruited small samples, showed a limited overlap between RD-specific and generic PROMs, and highlighted the presence of cultural and linguistic factors influencing results in multi-country studies. Lastly, the application of existing algorithms developed in non-RDs tended to produce inaccuracies at the bottom of the EQ-5D scale, due to the greater severity of RDs. CONCLUSIONS More research is encouraged to develop algorithms for a broader spectrum of RDs (including those affecting young children), improve mapping study quality, test the generalisability of algorithms developed in non-RDs (e.g. HIV) to rare variants or evolutions of the same condition (e.g. AIDS wasting syndrome), and verify the robustness of results when mapped HSUVs are used in cost-utility models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Meregaglia
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Amanda Whittal
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Nicod
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This paper provides an overview of type 2 diabetes economic simulation modeling and reviews current topics of discussion and major challenges in the field. RECENT FINDINGS Important challenges in the field include increasing the generalizability of models and improving transparency in model reporting. To identify and address these issues, modeling groups have organized through the Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge meetings and developed tools (i.e., checklist, impact inventory) to standardize modeling methods and reporting of results. Accordingly, many newer diabetes models have begun utilizing these tools, allowing for improved comparability between diabetes models. In the last two decades, type 2 diabetes simulation models have improved considerably, due to the collaborative work performed through the Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge meetings. To continue to improve diabetes models, future work must focus on clarifying diabetes progression in racial/ethnic minorities and incorporating equity considerations into health economic analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul S Dadwani
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Neda Laiteerapong
- Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Liu T, Li S, Wang M, Sun Q, Chen G. Mapping the Chinese Version of the EORTC QLQ-BR53 Onto the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Scores. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 13:537-555. [PMID: 32382953 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00422-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop mapping algorithms from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR53, including EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23) onto the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) and Short Form 6D (SF-6D) utility scores. METHODS The data were taken from 607 breast cancer patients in mainland China. The EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D instruments were scored using Chinese-specific tariffs. Three model specifications and seven statistical techniques were used to derive mapping algorithms, including ordinary least squares (OLS), Tobit, censored least absolute deviation (CLAD) model, generalized linear model (GLM), robust MM-estimator, finite mixtures of beta regression model for directly estimating health utility, and using ordered logit regression (OLOGIT) to predict response levels. A five-fold cross-validation approach was conducted to test the generalizability of each model. Two key goodness-of-fit statistics (mean absolute error and mean squared error) and three secondary statistics were employed to choose the optimal models. RESULTS Participants had a mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 49.0 ± 9.8 years. The mean ± SD health state utility scores were 0.828 ± 0.184 (EQ-5D-5L) and 0.646 ± 0.125 (SF-6D). Mapping performance was better when both the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 dimensions were considered rather than when either of these dimensions were used alone. The mapping functions from the optimal direct mapping and indirect mapping approaches were reported. CONCLUSIONS The algorithms reported in this paper enable EORTC QLQ-BR53 breast cancer data to be mapped into utilities predicted from the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D. The algorithms allow for the calculation of quality-adjusted life years for use in breast cancer cost-effectiveness analyses studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tong Liu
- School of Health Care Management, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan, 250012, China
| | - Shunping Li
- School of Health Care Management, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
- NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan, 250012, China.
| | - Min Wang
- Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, 266011, China
| | - Qiang Sun
- School of Health Care Management, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan, 250012, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kumar S, Thavorn K, van Katwyk S, Lasso A, Kilty SJ. Cost-effectiveness of Endoscopic Polypectomy in Clinic compared to Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A modelling study. Clin Otolaryngol 2020; 45:477-485. [PMID: 32227591 DOI: 10.1111/coa.13533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare costs and quality-adjusted life years of patients receiving endoscopic polypectomy in the clinic those receiving endoscopic sinus surgery from the perspective of Canada's health system. METHOD We developed a Markov model to simulate costs and quality-adjusted life years among a cohort of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps who received endoscopic polypectomy in clinic or endoscopic sinus surgery, over a patient's lifetime. Our study focused on patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps who have the predominant symptom of bilateral nasal obstruction. Cost data were obtained from Canadian sources. Health utility values were derived from Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores reported in the published literature. A cycle length of six months was used. Both costs and quality-adjusted life years were discounted using an annual rate of 1.5%. We conducted one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the study findings. RESULTS Endoscopic polypectomy in clinic was a cost-saving option as it had a lower cost (C$736 vs. C$6,728) and produced more quality-adjusted life years (13.85 vs 13.06) compared to endoscopic sinus surgery. Our findings were, however, highly sensitive to health utility values. Results from probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that endoscopic polypectomy in clinic had a lower cost and was more effective compared to endoscopic sinus surgery in 99.86% of iterations. CONCLUSION From the perspective of the publicly funded healthcare system, endoscopic polypectomy in clinic was economically attractive compared to endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps patients who have a primary symptom of bilateral nasal obstruction. The cost-effectiveness results are, however, highly dependent on the relative impact of endoscopic polypectomy in the clinic and endoscopic sinus surgery on post-surgery health utility values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srishti Kumar
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kednapa Thavorn
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Institute of Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sasha van Katwyk
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Lasso
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Shaun J Kilty
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Dr. S. Kilty Medicine Prof Corp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Noel CW, Stephens RF, Su J(S, Xu W, Krahn M, Monteiro E, Goldstein DP, Giuliani M, Hansen AR, Almeida JR. Mapping the
EORTC QLQ‐C30
and
QLQ‐H
&
N35
, onto
EQ‐5D‐5L
and
HUI
‐3 indices in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2020; 42:2277-2286. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.26181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2019] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W. Noel
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Princess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | | | - Jie (Susie) Su
- Department of Biostatistics University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Biostatistics University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Murray Krahn
- Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Eric Monteiro
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Sinai Health System, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - David P. Goldstein
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Princess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Meredith Giuliani
- Department of Radiation Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Aaron R. Hansen
- Department of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - John R. Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Princess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Reynders T, Devolder L, Valles-Colomer M, Van Remoortel A, Joossens M, De Keyser J, Nagels G, D'hooghe M, Raes J. Gut microbiome variation is associated to Multiple Sclerosis phenotypic subtypes. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2020; 7:406-419. [PMID: 32162850 PMCID: PMC7187717 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a heterogenous, inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. Microbiota alterations in MS versus healthy controls (HC) are observed, but results are inconsistent. We studied diversity, enterotypes, and specific gut microbial taxa variation between MS and HC, and between MS subgroups. Methods Amplicon sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA V4 region (Illumina MiSeq) was used to evaluate alpha and beta diversity, enterotypes, and relative taxa abundances on stool samples. MS subgroups were based on phenotype, disease course modifiers, and treatment status. Results were controlled for recently identified confounders of microbiota composition. Results Ninety‐eight MS patients and 120 HC were included. Microbial richness was lower in interferon‐treated (RRMS_I, N = 24) and untreated relapsing–remitting MS during relapse (RRMS_R, N = 4) when compared to benign (BMS, N = 20; Z = −3.07, Pcorr = 0.032 and Z = −2.68, Pcorr = 0.055) and primary progressive MS (PPMS, N = 26; Z = −2.39, Pcorr = 0.062 and Z = −2.26, Pcorr = 0.071). HC (N = 120) and active untreated MS (RRMS_U, N = 24) showed intermediate microbial richness. Enterotypes were associated with clinical subgroups (N = 218, χ2 = 36.10, P = 0.002), with Bacteroides 2 enterotype being more prevalent in RRMS_I. Butyricicoccus abundance was lower in PPMS than in RRMS_U (Z = −3.00, Pcorr = 0.014) and BMS (Z = −2.56, Pcorr = 0.031), lower in RRMS_I than in BMS (Z = −2.50, Pcorr = 0.034) and RRMS_U (Z = −2.91, Pcorr = 0.013), and inversely correlated with self‐reported physical symptoms (rho = −0.400, Pcorr = 0.001) and disease severity (rho = −0.223, P = 0.027). Interpretation These results emphasize the importance of phenotypic subcategorization in MS‐microbiome research, possibly explaining previous result heterogeneity, while showing the potential for specific microbiome‐based biomarkers for disease activity and severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatjana Reynders
- Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Edegem, Belgium.,Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium.,Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium
| | - Lindsay Devolder
- Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium.,Laboratory of Molecular Bacteriology (Rega Institute), Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Center of Microbiology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mireia Valles-Colomer
- Laboratory of Molecular Bacteriology (Rega Institute), Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Center of Microbiology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Marie Joossens
- Laboratory of Molecular Bacteriology (Rega Institute), Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Center of Microbiology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jacques De Keyser
- Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium.,Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium.,National Multiple Sclerosis Center, Melsbroek, Belgium.,Department of Neurology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Guy Nagels
- Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium.,Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium.,National Multiple Sclerosis Center, Melsbroek, Belgium.,Faculté de Psychology et des Sciences de l'Education, Mons, Belgium
| | - Marie D'hooghe
- Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium.,Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium.,National Multiple Sclerosis Center, Melsbroek, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Raes
- Laboratory of Molecular Bacteriology (Rega Institute), Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Center of Microbiology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zahra M, Durand-Zaleski I, Górecki M, Walleser Autiero S, Barnett G, Schüpbach WMM. Parkinson's disease with early motor complications: predicting EQ-5D- 3L utilities from PDQ-39 data in the EARLYSTIM trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:49. [PMID: 32122369 PMCID: PMC7053067 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01299-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A utility value is a health-related quality of life metric (HRQoL) metric used in a cost-effectiveness analysis. While utilities as outcomes in the treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) with deep brain stimulation (DBS) are available, they do not currently exist for PD with early motor complications. The objectives of this study were to predict utilities from observed disease-specific HRQoL data using two mapping algorithms, and investigate their performance in terms of longitudinal changes within and between treatment groups, and distribution by PD severity. Methods This is a post hoc analysis of data from the EARLYSTIM trial of DBS compared with best medical therapy (BMT) in PD patients with early motor complications We used two published algorithms comprising ordinal and multinomial regression models to map EQ-5D-3L utilities from observed PD-specific 39 item Questionnaire (PDQ-39) scores in EARLYSTIM. Utilities were calculated using the predicted functioning levels of EQ-5D-3L dimensions and the established EQ-5D-3L UK tariffs. Statistical analyses (analysis of variance, two-tailed Student’s t-test) were used to test the change from baseline within groups and difference in change from baseline between groups in utilities. Boxplots were developed to investigate the distribution of predicted utilities by PD severity, measured using the Hoehn and Yahr scale. Results The change from baseline in predicted mean utilities was statistically significant at all visits up to 24 months for the DBS group (p < 0.001) with both algorithms, and statistically significant at 12 months only (p = 0.04) for the BMT group with one algorithm. With both algorithms, the between-groups difference in change from baseline in predicted mean utilities favored DBS at all follow-up visits (p < 0.001). Based on the Hoehn and Yahr scale, predicted utilities deteriorated with increasing disease severity. Conclusions Among PD patients with early motor complications, utilities predicted by both mapping algorithms using PDQ-39 data demonstrated a statistically and clinically meaningful improvement with DBS compared with BMT. It was not possible to conclude if one algorithm was more responsive than other. In the absence of utilities collected directly from patients, mapping is an acceptable option permitting economic evaluations to be undertaken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Zahra
- Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Route de Molliau 31, 1131, Tolochenaz, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Durand-Zaleski
- Hôpital de l'Hotel-Dieu, Ile de France, 1 Place du Parvis de Notre-Dame, 75004, Paris, France.,Santé Publique Hôpital Henri-Mondor, 51, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Créteil, France
| | - Michal Górecki
- Health Technology Assessment Consulting, Starowiślna 17/3, 31-038, Kraków, Poland
| | - Silke Walleser Autiero
- Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Route de Molliau 31, 1131, Tolochenaz, Tolochenaz, Switzerland.
| | - Gillian Barnett
- Gillian Barnett and Associates Limited, Claggan, Hornhead, Dunfanaghy, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal, Dunfanaghy, Ireland
| | - W M Michael Schüpbach
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut National de Santé et en Recherche Médicale, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1422, Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013, Paris, France.,Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 8, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Martín-Fernández J, García -Maroto R, Bilbao A, García-Pérez L, Gutiérrez-Teira B, Molina-Siguero A, Arenaza JC, Ramos-García V, Rodríguez-Martínez G, Sánchez-Jiménez FJ, Ariza-Cardiel G. Impact of lower limb osteoarthritis on health-related quality of life: A cross-sectional study to estimate the expressed loss of utility in the Spanish population. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0228398. [PMID: 31978194 PMCID: PMC6980637 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Osteoarthritis of the lower limb (OALL) worsens health-related quality of life (HRQL), but this impact has not been quantified with standardized measures. We intend to evaluate the impact of OALL on HRQL through measures based on individual preferences in comparison to the general population. Methods A cross-sectional study was designed. A total of 6234 subjects aged 50 years or older without OALL were selected from the Spanish general population (National Health Survey 2011–12). An opportunistic sample of patients aged 50 years or older diagnosed with hip (n = 331) or knee osteoarthritis (n = 393), using the American Rheumatism Association criteria, was recruited from six hospitals and 21 primary care centers in Vizcaya, Madrid and Tenerife between January and December 2015. HRQL was measured with the EQ-5D-5L, and the results were transformed into utility scores. Sociodemographic variables (age, sex, social group, cohabitation), number of chronic diseases, and body mass index were considered. The clinical stage of OALL was collected using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the Oxford hip score and Oxford knee score. Generalized linear models were constructed using the utility index as the dependent variable. Results HRQL expressed by OALL patients was significantly worse than this of the general population. After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, the mean utility loss was -0.347 (95% CI: -0.390, -0.303) for osteoarthritis of the hip and -0.295 (95% CI: -0.336, -0.255) for osteoarthritis of the knee. OALL patients who were treated at a hospital had an additional utility loss of -0.112 (95% CI: -0.158, -0.065). Conclusion OALL has a great impact on HRQL. People with OALL perceive a utility loss of approximately 0.3 points compared to the general population without osteoarthritis, which is very high in relation to the utility loss reported for other chronic diseases and for arthritis in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús Martín-Fernández
- Unidad Docente Multiprofesional de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria Oeste, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Roberto García -Maroto
- Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- Doctorando en el Programa de Investigación en Ciencias Médico Quirúrgicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Amaia Bilbao
- Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
- Osakidetza, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Unidad de Investigación, Bilbao, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación en Servicios de Salud Kronikgune, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Lidia García-Pérez
- Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Blanca Gutiérrez-Teira
- Centro de Salud El Soto, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Molina-Siguero
- Centro de Salud Presentación Sabio, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Arenaza
- Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
- Osakidetza, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Vanesa Ramos-García
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Gemma Rodríguez-Martínez
- Centro de Salud Infante Don Luis, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fco Javier Sánchez-Jiménez
- Centro de Salud Gregorio Marañón, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gloria Ariza-Cardiel
- Unidad Docente Multiprofesional de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria Oeste, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mitsakakis N, Bremner KE, Tomlinson G, Krahn M. Exploring the Benefits of Transformations in Health Utility Mapping. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:183-197. [PMID: 31928302 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x19896567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background. Quality-of-life research and cost-effectiveness analyses frequently require data on health utility, a global measure of health-related quality of life. When utilities are unavailable, researchers have "mapped" descriptive instruments to utility instruments, using samples of responses to both instruments. Health utilities have an idiosyncratic distribution, with upper bound and probability mass at 1, left skewness, and kurtosis. Estimation of mean utility values conditional on covariates is of interest, particularly in health utility mapping applications. Traditional linear regression may be unsuitable because fundamental assumptions are violated. Complex statistical methods come with deficiencies that may outweigh their benefits. Aim. To investigate the benefits of transforming the health utility response variable before fitting a linear regression model. Methods. We compared log, logit, arcsin, and Box-Cox transformations with an untransformed model, using several measures of model accuracy. We made our evaluation by designing and conducting a simulation study and reanalyzing data from 2 published studies, which "mapped" a psychometric descriptive instrument to a utility instrument. Results. In the simulation study, log transformation with smearing estimator had in most cases the lowest bias but one of the highest variances, especially for estimating low utility values under small sample size. The untransformed model was outperformed by the transformed models. Findings were inconclusive for the analysis of real data, where arcsin gave the lowest error for one of the data sets, while the untransformed model had the best performance for the other. Conclusions. We identified the benefits of transformations and offered suggestions for future modeling of health utilities. However, the benefits were moderate and no single transformation appeared to be universally optimal, suggesting that selection requires examination on a case-by-case basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Mitsakakis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Biostatistics Research Unit, Toronto General Hospital
| | - Karen E Bremner
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative
| | - George Tomlinson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Biostatistics Research Unit, Toronto General Hospital
| | - Murray Krahn
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute and Toronto Health Economics Technology Assessment Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dixon P, Hollingworth W, Sparrow J. Mapping to Quality of Life and Capability Measures in Cataract Surgery Patients: From Cat-PROM5 to EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and ICECAP-O Using Mixture Modelling. MDM Policy Pract 2020; 5:2381468320915447. [PMID: 32285008 PMCID: PMC7137115 DOI: 10.1177/2381468320915447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives. Cataract is a prevalent and potentially blinding eye condition. Cataract surgery, the only proven treatment for this condition, is a very frequently undertaken procedure. The objective of this analysis was to develop a mapping algorithm that could be used to predict quality of life and capability scores from the Cat-PROM5, a newly developed, validated patient-reported outcome measure for patients undergoing cataract surgery. Methods. We estimated linear models and adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models. Data were taken from the Predict-CAT cohort of up to 1181 patients undergoing cataract surgery at two sites in England. The Cat-PROM5 was mapped to two quality of life measures (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L) and one capability measure (ICECAP-O). All patients reported ICECAP-O and one or other of the EQ-5D measures both before and after cataract surgery. Model performance was assessed using likelihood statistics, graphical inspections of model fit, and error measurements. Results. Adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models dominated linear models on all performance criteria. Mixture models offered very good fit. Three component models that allowed component membership to be a function of covariates (age, sex, and diabetic status depending on specification and outcome measure) and which conditioned on covariates offered the best performance in almost all cases. An exception was the EQ-5D-5L post-surgery for which a two-component model was selected. Conclusions. Mapping from Cat-PROM5 to quality of life and capability measures using adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models is feasible, and the estimates can be used to support cost-effectiveness analysis in relation to cataract care. Mixture models performed strongly for both quality of life outcomes and capability outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Padraig Dixon
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical
School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol
Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - William Hollingworth
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical
School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - John Sparrow
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical
School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Stephens RF, Noel CW, Su J(S, Xu W, Krahn M, Monteiro E, Goldstein DP, Giuliani M, Hansen AR, Almeida JR. Mapping the University of Washington Quality of life questionnaire onto EQ‐5D and HUI‐3 indices in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2019; 42:513-521. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.26031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2019] [Revised: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christopher W. Noel
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Jie (Susie) Su
- Department of BiostatisticsUniversity Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of BiostatisticsUniversity Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Murray Krahn
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Eric Monteiro
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgerySinai Health System, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - David P. Goldstein
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Meredith Giuliani
- Department of Radiation OncologyPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre—University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Aaron R. Hansen
- Department of Medical OncologyPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - John R. Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kent S, Becker F, Feenstra T, Tran-Duy A, Schlackow I, Tew M, Zhang P, Ye W, Lizheng S, Herman W, McEwan P, Schramm W, Gray A, Leal J, Lamotte M, Willis M, Palmer AJ, Clarke P. The Challenge of Transparency and Validation in Health Economic Decision Modelling: A View from Mount Hood. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2019; 37:1305-1312. [PMID: 31347104 PMCID: PMC6860461 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00825-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Transparency in health economic decision modelling is important for engendering confidence in the models and in the reliability of model-based cost-effectiveness analyses. The Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge Network has taken a lead in promoting transparency through validation with biennial conferences in which diabetes modelling groups meet to compare simulated outcomes of pre-specified scenarios often based on the results of pivotal clinical trials. Model registration is a potential method for promoting transparency, while also reducing the duplication of effort. An important network initiative is the ongoing construction of a diabetes model registry (https://www.mthooddiabeteschallenge.com). Following the 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and the Society of Medical Decision Making (ISPOR-SMDM) guidelines, we recommend that modelling groups provide technical and non-technical documentation sufficient to enable model reproduction, but not necessarily provide the model code. We also request that modelling groups upload documentation on the methods and outcomes of validation efforts, and run reference case simulations so that model outcomes can be compared. In this paper, we discuss conflicting definitions of transparency in health economic modelling, and describe the ongoing development of a registry of economic models for diabetes through the Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge Network, its objectives and potential further developments, and highlight the challenges in its construction and maintenance. The support of key stakeholders such as decision-making bodies and journals is key to ensuring the success of this and other registries. In the absence of public funding, the development of a network of modellers is of huge value in enhancing transparency, whether through registries or other means.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seamus Kent
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Frauke Becker
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Talitha Feenstra
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services Research, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- University of Groningen, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - An Tran-Duy
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Iryna Schlackow
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michelle Tew
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ping Zhang
- Division of Diabetes Translation, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA
| | - Wen Ye
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Shi Lizheng
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA
| | - William Herman
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Phil McEwan
- Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Alastair Gray
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jose Leal
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Michael Willis
- The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Andrew J Palmer
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, The University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - Philip Clarke
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yang Q, Yu XX, Zhang W, Li H. Mapping function from FACT-B to EQ-5D-5 L using multiple modelling approaches: data from breast cancer patients in China. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:153. [PMID: 31615531 PMCID: PMC6792204 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1224-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) is the most commonly used scale for assessing quality of life in patients with breast cancer. The lack of preference-based measures limits the cost-utility of breast cancer in China. The goal of this study was to explore whether a mapping function can be established from the FACT-B to the EQ-5D-5 L when the EQ-5D health-utility index is not available. Methods A cross-sectional survey of adults with breast cancer was conducted in China. All patients included in the study completed the EQ-5D-5 L and the disease-specific FACT-B questionnaire, and demographic and clinical data were also collected. The Chinese tariff value was used to calculate the EQ-5D-5 L utility scores. Five models were evaluated using three different modelling approaches: the ordinary least squares (OLS) model, the Tobit model and the two-part model (TPM). Total scores, domain scores, squared terms and interaction terms were introduced into models. The goodness of fit, signs of the estimated coefficients, and normality of prediction errors of the model were also assessed. The normality of the prediction error is determined by calculating the root mean squared error (RMSE), the mean absolute deviation (MAD), and the mean absolute error (MAE). Akaike information criteria (AIC) and Bayes information criteria (BIC) were also used to assess models and predictive performances. The OLS model was followed by simple linear equating to avoid regression to the mean. Results The performance of the models was improved after the introduction of the squared terms and the interaction terms. The OLS model, including the squared terms and the interaction terms, performed best for mapping the EQ-5D-5 L. The explanatory power of the OLS model was 70.0%. The AIC and BIC of this model were the smallest (AIC = -705.106, BIC = -643.601). The RMSE, MAD and MAE of the OLS model, Tobit model and TPM were similar. The MAE values of the 5-fold cross-validation of the multiple models in this study were 0.07155~0.08509; meanwhile, the MAE of the TPM was the smallest, followed by that of the OLS model. The OLS regression proved to be the most accurate for the mean, and linearly equated scores were much closer to observed scores. Conclusions This study establishes a mapping algorithm based on the Chinese population to estimate the EQ-5D-5 L index of the FACT-B and confirms that OLS models have higher explanatory power and that TPMs have lower prediction error. Given the accuracy of the mean prediction and the simplicity of the model, we recommend using the OLS model. The algorithm can be used to calculate EQ-5D scores when EQ-5D data are not directly collected in a study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Yang
- Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Xue Xin Yu
- Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Hui Li
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Panchagnula S, Sun X, Montejo JD, Nouri A, Kolb L, Virojanapa J, Camara-Quintana JQ, Sommaruga S, Patel K, Lakomkin N, Abbed K, Cheng JS. Validating the Transformation of PROMIS-GH to EQ-5D in Adult Spine Patients. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8101506. [PMID: 31547030 PMCID: PMC6832387 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal disorders and associated interventions are costly in the United States, putting them in the limelight of economic analyses. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Survey (PROMIS-GHS) requires mapping to other surveys for economic investigation. Previous studies have proposed transformations of PROMIS-GHS to EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) health index scores. These models require validation in adult spine patients. In our study, PROMIS-GHS and EQ-5D were randomly administered to 121 adult spine patients. The actual health index scores were calculated from the EQ-5D instrument and estimated scores were calculated from the PROMIS-GHS responses with six models. Goodness-of-fit for each model was determined using the coefficient of determination (R2), mean squared error (MSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). Among the models, the model treating the eight PROMIS-GHS items as categorical variables (CATReg) was the optimal model with the highest R2 (0.59) and lowest MSE (0.02) and MAE (0.11) in our spine sample population. Subgroup analysis showed good predictions of the mean EQ-5D by gender, age groups, education levels, etc. The transformation from PROMIS-GHS to EQ-5D had a high accuracy of mean estimate on a group level, but not at the individual level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shreyas Panchagnula
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Xin Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Julio D Montejo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA
| | - Aria Nouri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Luis Kolb
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Justin Virojanapa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA
| | | | - Samuel Sommaruga
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kishan Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Nikita Lakomkin
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Khalid Abbed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Joseph S Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mapping the Shah-modified Barthel Index to the Health Utility Index Mark III by the Mean Rank Method. Qual Life Res 2019; 28:3177-3185. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02254-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
39
|
|
40
|
Desai M, Bentley A, Keck WA, Haag T, Taylor RS, Dakin H. Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on trial data. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20:302. [PMID: 31238925 PMCID: PMC6593544 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2681-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with painful knee osteoarthritis, long-term symptomatic relief may improve quality of life. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) has demonstrated significant improvements in pain, physical function and health-related quality of life compared with conservative therapy with intra-articular steroid (IAS) injections. This study aimed to establish the cost-effectiveness of CRFA compared with IAS for managing moderate to severe osteoarthritis-related knee pain, from the US Medicare system perspective. METHODS We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis utilizing efficacy data (Oxford Knee Scores) from a randomized, crossover trial on CRFA (NCT02343003), which compared CRFA with IAS out to 6 and 12 months, and with IAS patients who subsequently crossed over to receive CRFA after 6 months. Outcomes included health benefits (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]), costs and cost-effectiveness (expressed as cost per QALY gained). QALYs were estimated by mapping Oxford Knee Scores to the EQ-5D generic utility measure using a validated algorithm. Secondary analyses explored differences in the settings of care and procedures used in-trial versus real-world clinical practice. RESULTS CRFA resulted in an incremental QALY gain of 0.091 at an incremental cost of $1711, equating to a cost of US$18,773 per QALY gained over a 6-month time horizon versus IAS. Over a 12-month time horizon, the incremental QALY gain was 0.229 at the same incremental cost, equating to a cost of US$7462 per QALY gained versus IAS. Real-world cost assumptions resulted in modest increases in the cost per QALY gained to a maximum of US$21,166 and US$8296 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that findings were robust to variations in efficacy and cost parameters. CONCLUSIONS CRFA is a highly cost-effective treatment option for patients with osteoarthritis-related knee pain, compared with the US$100,000/QALY threshold typically used in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehul Desai
- International Spine Pain and Performance Center, Washington, DC, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Rod S Taylor
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Helen Dakin
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lim J, Choi SE, Bae E, Kang D, Lim EA, Shin GS. Mapping analysis to estimate EQ-5D utility values using the COPD assessment test in Korea. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:97. [PMID: 31170982 PMCID: PMC6555011 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1148-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is no research on mapping algorithms between EQ-5D and COPD assessment test (CAT) in Korea. The purpose of this study was to develop mapping algorithms that predict EQ-5D-3 L utility from the CAT in patients with COPD. Methods Survey data of 300 COPD patients were collected from three tertiary teaching hospitals in Korea. To predict EQ-5D-3 L utility from the CAT, various models were assessed. Models were developed using randomly split training samples. Subsequently, the models were validated based on root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) in validation samples. The models were also validated using the bootstrap method, which involves iterative splitting, training, and validating of the sample data at least 10,000 times. Average RMSEs and MAEs were used as criteria for model selection. Results The recommended mapping algorithms were based on ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models, which revealed five CAT items (chest tightness, breathlessness, activity, leaving home, and energy) as statistically significant on the EQ-5D-3 L. The mapping models estimated the overall mean of EQ-5D-3 L utilities effectively, but EQ-5D-3 L utilities for severe (low utility) patients (< 0.6) were overestimated as the observed EQ-5D-3 L utilities were often distributed over 0.6. Conclusion Mapping algorithms can be used to predict EQ-5D-3 L utilities from the CAT. However, mapping algorithms should be used cautiously when applied to groups with greater disease severity. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-019-1148-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeok Lim
- College of Pharmacy, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-ro, Sejong, 30019, South Korea
| | - Sang-Eun Choi
- College of Pharmacy, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-ro, Sejong, 30019, South Korea.
| | - Eunmi Bae
- College of Pharmacy, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-ro, Sejong, 30019, South Korea
| | - Daewon Kang
- College of Pharmacy, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-ro, Sejong, 30019, South Korea
| | - Eun-A Lim
- College of Pharmacy, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-ro, Sejong, 30019, South Korea
| | - Gyeong-Seon Shin
- College of Pharmacy, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-ro, Sejong, 30019, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Webb NJ, Woolley RL, Lambe T, Frew E, Brettell EA, Barsoum EN, Trompeter RS, Cummins C, Wheatley K, Ives NJ. Sixteen-week versus standard eight-week prednisolone therapy for childhood nephrotic syndrome: the PREDNOS RCT. Health Technol Assess 2019; 23:1-108. [PMID: 31156083 DOI: 10.3310/hta23260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal corticosteroid regimen for treating the presenting episode of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) remains uncertain. Most UK centres use an 8-week regimen, despite previous systematic reviews indicating that longer regimens reduce the risk of relapse and frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS). OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to determine whether or not an extended 16-week course of prednisolone increases the time to first relapse. The secondary objectives were to compare the relapse rate, FRNS and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) rates, requirement for alternative immunosuppressive agents and corticosteroid-related adverse events (AEs), including adverse behaviour and costs. DESIGN Randomised double-blind parallel-group placebo-controlled trial, including a cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING One hundred and twenty-five UK paediatric departments. PARTICIPANTS Two hundred and thirty-seven children presenting with a first episode of SSNS. Participants aged between 1 and 15 years were randomised (1 : 1) according to a minimisation algorithm to ensure balance of ethnicity (South Asian, white or other) and age (≤ 5 or ≥ 6 years). INTERVENTIONS The control group (n = 118) received standard course (SC) prednisolone therapy: 60 mg/m2/day of prednisolone in weeks 1-4, 40 mg/m2 of prednisolone on alternate days in weeks 5-8 and matching placebo on alternate days in weeks 9-18 (total 2240 mg/m2). The intervention group (n = 119) received extended course (EC) prednisolone therapy: 60 mg/m2/day of prednisolone in weeks 1-4; started at 60 mg/m2 of prednisolone on alternate days in weeks 5-16, tapering by 10 mg/m2 every 2 weeks (total 3150 mg/m2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was time to first relapse [Albustix® (Siemens Healthcare Limited, Frimley, UK)-positive proteinuria +++ or greater for 3 consecutive days or the presence of generalised oedema plus +++ proteinuria]. The secondary outcome measures were relapse rate, incidence of FRNS and SDNS, other immunosuppressive therapy use, rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) and AEs and the incidence of behavioural change [using Achenbach Child Behaviour Checklist (ACBC)]. A comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. The analysis was by intention to treat. Participants were followed for a minimum of 24 months. RESULTS There was no significant difference in time to first relapse between the SC and EC groups (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 1.17; log-rank p = 0.3). There were also no differences in the incidence of FRNS (SC 50% vs. EC 53%; p = 0.7), SDNS (44% vs. 42%; p = 0.8) or requirement for other immunosuppressive therapy (56% vs. 54%; p = 0.8). The total prednisolone dose received following completion of study medication was 5475 mg vs. 6674 mg (p = 0.07). SAE rates were not significantly different (25% vs. 17%; p = 0.1) and neither were AEs, except poor behaviour (yes/no), which was less frequent with EC treatment. There were no differences in ACBC scores. EC therapy was associated with a mean increase in generic health benefit [0.0162 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)] and cost savings (£4369 vs. £2696). LIMITATIONS Study drug formulation may have prevented some younger children who were unable to swallow whole or crushed tablets from participating. CONCLUSIONS This trial has not shown any clinical benefit for EC prednisolone therapy in UK children. The cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that EC therapy may be cheaper, with the possibility of a small QALY benefit. FUTURE WORK Studies investigating EC versus SC therapy in younger children and further cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16645249 and EudraCT 2010-022489-29. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 26. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Ja Webb
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca L Woolley
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tosin Lambe
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Emma Frew
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Emma N Barsoum
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Carole Cummins
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Keith Wheatley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Natalie J Ives
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mukuria C, Rowen D, Harnan S, Rawdin A, Wong R, Ara R, Brazier J. An Updated Systematic Review of Studies Mapping (or Cross-Walking) Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life to Generic Preference-Based Measures to Generate Utility Values. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2019; 17:295-313. [PMID: 30945127 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00467-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mapping is an increasingly common method used to predict instrument-specific preference-based health-state utility values (HSUVs) from data obtained from another health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. There have been several methodological developments in this area since a previous review up to 2007. OBJECTIVE To provide an updated review of all mapping studies that map from HRQoL measures to target generic preference-based measures (EQ-5D measures, SF-6D, HUI measures, QWB, AQoL measures, 15D/16D/17D, CHU-9D) published from January 2007 to October 2018. DATA SOURCES A systematic review of English language articles using a variety of approaches: searching electronic and utilities databases, citation searching, targeted journal and website searches. STUDY SELECTION Full papers of studies that mapped from one health measure to a target preference-based measure using formal statistical regression techniques. DATA EXTRACTION Undertaken by four authors using predefined data fields including measures, data used, econometric models and assessment of predictive ability. RESULTS There were 180 papers with 233 mapping functions in total. Mapping functions were generated to obtain EQ-5D-3L/EQ-5D-5L-EQ-5D-Y (n = 147), SF-6D (n = 45), AQoL-4D/AQoL-8D (n = 12), HUI2/HUI3 (n = 13), 15D (n = 8) CHU-9D (n = 4) and QWB-SA (n = 4) HSUVs. A large number of different regression methods were used with ordinary least squares (OLS) still being the most common approach (used ≥ 75% times within each preference-based measure). The majority of studies assessed the predictive ability of the mapping functions using mean absolute or root mean squared errors (n = 192, 82%), but this was lower when considering errors across different categories of severity (n = 92, 39%) and plots of predictions (n = 120, 52%). CONCLUSIONS The last 10 years has seen a substantial increase in the number of mapping studies and some evidence of advancement in methods with consideration of models beyond OLS and greater reporting of predictive ability of mapping functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Sue Harnan
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Andrew Rawdin
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Ruth Wong
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Roberta Ara
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Shi Y, Thompson J, Walker AS, Paton NI, Cheung YB. Mapping the medical outcomes study HIV health survey (MOS-HIV) to the EuroQoL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D-3 L) utility index. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:83. [PMID: 31077251 PMCID: PMC6511158 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1135-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mapping of health-related quality-of-life measures to health utility values can facilitate cost-utility evaluation. Regression-based methods tend to lead to shrinkage of variance. This study aims to map the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) to EuroQoL 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-3 L) utility index, and to characterize the performance of three mapping methods, including ordinary least squares (OLS), equi-percentile method (EPM), and a recently proposed method called Mean Rank Method (MRM). Methods This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized HIV treatment trial. Baseline data from 421 participants were used to develop mapping functions. Follow-up data from 236 participants was used to validate the mapping functions. Results In the training dataset, MRM and OLS, but not EPM, reproduced the observed mean utility (0.731). MRM, OLS and EPM under-estimated the standard deviation by 0.3, 26.6 and 1.7%, respectively. MRM had the lowest mean absolute error (0.143) and highest intraclass correlation coefficient (0.723) with the observed utility values, whereas OLS had the lowest mean squared error (0.038) and highest R-squared (0.542). Regressing the MRM- and OLS-mapped utility values upon body mass index and log-viral load gave covariate associations comparable to those estimated from the observed utility data (all P > 0.10). EPM did not achieve this property. Findings from the validation data were similar. Conclusions Functions are available for mapping the MOS-HIV to the EQ-5D-3 L utility values. MRM and OLS were comparable in terms of agreement with the observed utility values at the individual level. MRM had better performance at the group level in terms of describing the utility distribution. Trial registration NCT00988039. Registered 30 September 2009. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-019-1135-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Shi
- Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jennifer Thompson
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - A Sarah Walker
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas I Paton
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Infectious Disease, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yin Bun Cheung
- Program in Health Services & System Research and Center for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Level 6, Academia, Singapore, Singapore. .,Center for Child Health Research, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Robinson T, Oluboyede Y. Estimating CHU-9D Utility Scores from the WAItE: A Mapping Algorithm for Economic Evaluation. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:239-246. [PMID: 30711070 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.09.2839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Revised: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Weight-Specific Adolescent Instrument for Economic Evaluation (WAItE) is a new condition-specific patient reported outcome measure that incorporates the views of adolescents in assessing the impact of above healthy weight status on key aspects of their lives. Presently it is not possible to use the WAItE to calculate quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for cost-utility analysis (CUA), given that utility scores are not available for health states described by the WAItE. OBJECTIVE This paper examines different regression models for estimating Child Health Utility 9 Dimension (CHU-9D) utility scores from the WAItE for the purpose of calculating QALYs to inform CUA. METHODS The WAItE and CHU-9D were completed by a sample of 975 adolescents. Nine regression models were estimated: ordinary least squares, Tobit, censored least absolute deviations, two-part, generalized linear model, robust MM-estimator, beta-binomial, finite mixture models, and ordered logistic regression. The mean absolute error (MAE) and mean squared error (MSE) were used to assess the predictive ability of the models. RESULTS The robust MM-estimator with stepwise-selected WAItE item scores as explanatory variables had the best predictive accuracy. CONCLUSIONS Condition-specific tools have been shown to be more sensitive to changes that are important to the population for which they have been developed for. The mapping algorithm developed in this study facilitates the estimation of health-state utilities necessary for undertaking CUA within clinical studies that have only collected the WAItE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomos Robinson
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
| | - Yemi Oluboyede
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gärtner FR, Marinus J, van den Hout WB, Vleggeert-Lankamp C, Stiggelbout AM. The Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale: development and evaluation of a new functional outcome measure for cervical radicular syndrome. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 42:1894-1905. [PMID: 30686066 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1534996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate an outcome scale for the cervical radicular syndrome and to build a mapping, predicting EQ-5D utility from the new scale.Study design and setting: An item pool was developed based on literature and patient and clinician interviews. Item selection was based on symptomatology, factor analysis, and internal consistency. We assessed: (a) test-retest reliability by standard error of measurement and intraclass correlation coefficients; (b) construct validity by testing 22 hypotheses on relationships with existing measures and known-group differences. For the mapping, performance was assessed by mean absolute error and root mean squared error.Results: A total of 254 patients with cervical radicular syndrome completed the first questionnaire, 61 stable patients a retest. Item selection led to a 21-item questionnaire consisting of three subscales: Symptoms, Energy and postures, and Actions and activities. Standard error of measurement values ranged from 6.7 to 11.2 on a 0 to 100 scale. All subscales showed good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.84, 0.87, and 0.94). All hypotheses for construct validity were confirmed. A linear utility mapping was preferred, with reasonable statistical performance.Conclusion: We developed a reliable and valid cervical radicular syndrome specific outcome scale, called the Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale (CRIS). This new questionnaire may facilitate (cost-)effectiveness studies in this field.Implications for RehabilitationThe cervical radicular syndrome is a frequently occurring and invalidating health problem, which causes severe radiating pain in the arm and/or hand, which can be accompanied by motor and/or sensory deficits.The Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale (CRIS) is a newly developed self-report questionnaire which covers measurement of symptoms and limitations in patients with cervical radiculopathy due to irradiating pain, tingling sensations and sensory loss in the arm in combination with neck disability.The CRIS consists of 21 items divided over three subscales: (i) symptoms, (ii) energy and postures, and (iii) actions and activities.The CRIS shows good content validity, test-retest reliability, construct validity and is able to discriminate between groups.The CRIS predicts EQ-5D utility and is therefore useful for (cost)effectiveness studies in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fania R Gärtner
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Marinus
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert B van den Hout
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne M Stiggelbout
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Moore A, Young CA, Hughes DA. Mapping ALSFRS-R and ALSUI to EQ-5D in Patients with Motor Neuron Disease. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018; 21:1322-1329. [PMID: 30442280 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Revised: 05/10/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) is the preferred measure of health outcome in clinical trials in motor neuron disease (MND). It, however, does not provide a preference-based health utility score required for estimating quality-adjusted life-years in economic evaluations for health technology assessments. OBJECTIVES To develop algorithms for mapping from measures used in MND clinical studies to allow for future prediction of the five-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) utility in populations of patients with MND when utility data have not been collected. METHODS Direct mapping models were developed using ordinary least squares and Tobit regression analyses to estimate EQ-5D-5L utilities (based on English tariffs), with ALSFRS-R total, domain, and item scores used as explanatory variables, using patient-level data from a UK cohort study. Indirect mapping models were also used to map EQ-5D-5L domains, using the same variables, along with the Neuropathic Pain Scale and the Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale for MND using multinomial logistic regression analysis. Goodness of fit was assessed along with predicted values for each mapping model. RESULTS The best-performing model predicting EQ-5D-5L utilities used five items of the ALSFRS-R items as explanatory variables in a stepwise ordinary least squares regression. The mean squared error was 0.0228, and the mean absolute error was 0.1173. Prediction was good, with 55.4% of estimated values within 0.1 and 91.4% within 0.25 of the observed EQ-5D-5L utility value. Indirect mapping using the Neuropathic Pain Scale and the Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale for MND provided less predictive power than direct mapping models. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to present mapping algorithms to crosswalk between ALSFRS-R and EQ-5D-5L. This analysis demonstrates that the ALSFRS-R can be used to estimate EQ-5D-5L utilities when they have not been collected directly within a trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Moore
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Dyfrig A Hughes
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Predicting EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utilities from Older People's Quality of Life Brief Questionnaire (OPQoL-Brief) Scores. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018. [PMID: 28623629 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0259-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Economic evaluation of healthcare treatment and services targeted at older people requires measurement of utility-based quality-of-life outcomes but it is not always possible to collect such outcome data. It may, however, be possible to estimate these outcomes using non-utility measures of quality of life where the latter have been collected. The objective of this study was to develop a regression-based algorithm to map a non-utility-based outcome, the Older People's Quality of Life brief questionnaire (OPQoL-brief), onto a utility-based outcome, the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L). METHODS The estimation sample comprised 330 community-based Australian older people (>65 years), while the validation sample consisted of 293 older people from a separate study. Six regression techniques were employed to estimate utilities from OPQoL-brief. The predictive accuracy of 54 regression models (six regression techniques × nine model specifications) was assessed using six criteria: mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), correlation, distribution of predicted utilities, distribution of residuals, and proportion of predictions with absolute errors <0.05. RESULTS The 54 regression models predicted EQ-5D-5L utilities that performed differently when assessed by the six criteria. However, best results were obtained from an ordinary least squares (OLS) model where all 13 OPQoL-brief items were included as continuous variables (OLS 4). RMSE and MAE estimates for this model (0.2201 and 0.1638, respectively) were within the range of published estimates. CONCLUSIONS It is possible to predict valid utilities from OPQoL-brief using regression methods. We recommend OLS model (4) for this exercise.
Collapse
|
49
|
Hua AY, Westin O, Hamrin Senorski E, Svantesson E, Grassi A, Zaffagnini S, Samuelsson K, Svensson M. Mapping functions in health-related quality of life: mapping from the Achilles Tendon Rupture Score to the EQ-5D. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26:3083-3088. [PMID: 29691617 PMCID: PMC6154025 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-4954-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Health state utility values are derived from preference-based measurements and are useful in calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which is a metric commonly used in cost-effectiveness studies. The purpose of this study was to convert the Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS) to the preference-based European Quality of Life-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) by estimating the relationship between the two scores using mapping. METHODS Data were collected from a randomised controlled trial, where 100 patients were treated either surgically or non-surgically for Achilles tendon rupture. Forty-three and forty-four patients in surgical group and non-surgical group completed the ATRS and the EQ-5D alongside each other during follow-up at three time points. Different models of the relationship between the ATRS and the EQ-5D were developed and analysed based on direct mapping and cross-validation. The model with the lowest mean absolute error was observed as the one with the best fit. RESULTS Among the competing models, mapping based on using a combination of the ATRS items four, five, and six associated with limitation due to pain, during activities of daily living and when walking on uneven ground, produced the best predictor of the EQ-5D score. CONCLUSIONS The present study provides a mapping algorithm to enable the derivation of utility values directly from the ATRS. This approach makes it feasible for researchers, as well as medical practitioners, to obtain preference-based values in clinical studies or settings where only the ATRS is being administered. The algorithm allows for the calculation of QALYs for use in cost-effectiveness analyses, making it valuable in the study of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ay-Yen Hua
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Olof Westin
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Eric Hamrin Senorski
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eleonor Svantesson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Alberto Grassi
- II Orthopaedic Clinic, IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Zaffagnini
- II Orthopaedic Clinic, IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy
| | - Kristian Samuelsson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Mikael Svensson
- Health Metrics, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kaambwa B, Smith C, de Lacey S, Ratcliffe J. Does Selecting Covariates Using Factor Analysis in Mapping Algorithms Improve Predictive Accuracy? A Case of Predicting EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utilities from the Women's Health Questionnaire. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018; 21:1205-1217. [PMID: 30314622 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Revised: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In addition to theoretical justifications, many statistical methods have been used for selecting covariates to include in algorithms mapping nonutility measures onto utilities. However, it is not clear whether using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) as one such method improves the predictive ability of these algorithms. OBJECTIVE This question is addressed within the context of mapping a non-utility-based outcome, the core 23-item Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ-23), onto two utility instruments: five-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and the six-dimensional health state short form (derived from short form 36 health survey) (SF-6D). METHODS Data on all three outcomes were collected from 455 women from the Australian general population participating in a study assessing attitudes toward in vitro fertilization. Statistical methods for selecting covariates included stepwise regression (SW), including all covariates (Include all), multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP), and EFA. The predictive accuracy of 108 regression models was assessed using five criteria: mean absolute error, root mean squared error, correlation, distribution of predicted utilities, and proportion of predictions with absolute errors of less than 0.0.5. Validation of "primary" models was carried out on random samples of the in vitro fertilization study. RESULTS The best results for EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D predictions were obtained from models using SW, "Include all," and MFP covariate-selection approaches. Root mean squared error (0.0762-0.1434) and mean absolute error (0.0590-0.0924) estimates for these models were within the range of published estimates. EFA was outperformed by other covariate-selection methods. CONCLUSIONS It is possible to predict valid utilities from the WHQ-23 using regression methods based on SW, "Include all," and MFP covariate-selection techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Billingsley Kaambwa
- Health Economics Unit, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Caroline Smith
- The National Institute of Complementary Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sheryl de Lacey
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Institute for Choice, Business School, University of South Australia Business School, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|