Cross-cultural French adaptation and validation of the Impact On Family Scale (IOFS)

Parental Perceptions of the Impact of a Child's Complex Chronic Condition: A Validation Study of the Impact on Family Scale

The diagnosis of a child's complex chronic illness may impact family relationships and cohesion. The Impact on Family Scale (IFS) is an instrument used to assess the parental perception of the effects of children's chronic illness on family life. With a sample of 110 mothers and fathers between the ages of 29 and 50 who have a child with a complex chronic illness, we examine evidence of the validity of the IFS for use in Portugal within this specific family configuration, (1) comparing its factor structure with the original one; (2) assessing its reliability; and (3) evaluating its relationship with life satisfaction and family cohesion/acceptance. As expected, CFA analysis showed that IFS is a one-factor reliable instrument with 12 items (Cronbach's alpha = 0.910), which are negatively correlated with satisfaction with life (r = -0.229, p = 0.016) and positively correlated with family acceptance and cohesion (r = 0.363; p < 0.001). The results support the validity of the IFS in families with children and adolescents with a complex chronic illness. The implications of the use of this instrument for research and professional practice is analyzed.

Financial and relational impact of having a boy with posterior urethral valves

Introduction

Childhood chronic diseases affect family functioning and well-being. The aim of this study was to measure the impact of caring for a child with PUV, and the factors that most impact the burden of care.

Patients and method

We gave a questionnaire on the familial impact of having a child with posterior urethral valves to all parents of a child included in the CIRCUP trial from 2015 onwards. The questionnaire included questions about the parents' demographics, health, professional, financial and marital status and how these evolved since the child's birth as well as the "impact on family scale" (IOFS), which gives a total score ranging from 15 (no impact) to 60 (maximum impact). We then analyzed both the results of the specific demographic questions as well as the factors which influenced the IOFS score.

Results

We retrieved answers for 38/51 families (74.5% response rate). The average IOFS score was 23.7 (15-51). We observed that the child's creatinine level had an effect on the IOFS score (p = 0.02), as did the parent's gender (p = 0.008), health status (p = 0.015), being limited in activity since the birth of the child (p = 0.020), being penalized in one's job (p = 0.009), being supported in one's job (p = 0.002), and decreased income (p = 0.004). Out of 38 mother/father binomials, 8/33 (24.2%) declared that they were no longer in the same relationship afterwards.

Conclusion

In conclusion, having a boy with PUV significantly impacts families. The risk of parental separation and decrease in revenue is significant. Strategies aiming to decrease these factors should be put in place as soon as possible.

Correlation of continence with long-term patient centered outcomes in children with sacrococcygeal teratoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship of social continence with patient centered outcomes, such as quality of life, in children with sarococcygeal teratoma (SCT). We hypothesize there is a correlation between social continence and patient-centered outcomes.

METHODS

A chart review and three surveys (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™), Baylor Continence Scale (BCS), and Impact on Family (IOF)) were performed for SCT patients who underwent resection at our institution from 2013 to 2018. PedsQL™ assesses quality of life, BCS evaluates global continence, and the IOF scale measures the impact of a child's illness on the family. Pearson correlation was used to examine the relationship between BCS, PedsQL™, and IOF.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were identified with 72% (13/18) participating in the surveys with a median age at time of survey of 4.7 years (range 2.8-7.9). Patients with Altman IV were diagnosed postnatally and had smaller tumors. At the time of survey administration, a majority of children were toilet trained (54%, 7/13). Parents reported urinary incontinence (46%, 6/13) more frequently than bowel incontinence (15%, 2/13). Altman III/IV trended towards worse PedsQL™, BCS, and IOF surveys; however, it was not significant. The BCS correlated with the Total PedsQL™ (ρ = -0.56, p = 0.048) and IOF (ρ = 0.68, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Children with SCT have a correlation between social continence, quality of life, and the impact on family. This study suggests interventions to screen and improve continence in children with SCT could also improve patient centered metrics.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prognosis Study.

Mothers' perception of cerebral palsy in a low-income country of West Africa: a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Investigating mothers' perceptions of Cerebral Palsy (CP) and the impact of caregiving on family life in Benin, a west-African low to middle-income country (LMIC).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study we interviewed at their homes 88 mothers of children with CP about their perception of the cause of CP and stigmatization issues. Additionally, they completed the Impact on Family Scale and the Family Support Scale questionnaires. Multinomial and ordinal regressions analyses were used (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Most mothers (78%) referred to non-biomedical causes of CP (God's will or curse). Caregivers with a limited education level were more likely to report non-biomedical beliefs. Only 28% reported having received from physicians an explanation of the causes of CP. Around 38% endorsed neighbors considered their children as cursed, which is a source of stigmatization. Mothers perceived a high impact of caregiving on their family life that correlated with non-biomedical beliefs, low education level, and the severity of CP.

CONCLUSION

There is a need in Benin, and probably in West-African LMICs generally, to shift to a family-centered care system and to inform the public about the root causes of CP to improve social integration of children with CP and decrease the negative impact on their families.Implication for rehabilitationMothers with a limited education level are more likely to report non-biomedical causes of CP in this LMIC;mothers' level of education and non-biomedical beliefs of causes of CP are associated to a high impact of caregiving on family life in this LMIC;mothers of children with CP in this LMIC do not perceive health-workers helpful.

Validation of the Impact on Family Scale (Spanish Version) and Predictive Variables in Parents of Children with Severe Food Allergy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Severe food allergies in children have serious consequences for their daily lives, but also for their families. The aim of the present study was to validate the impact on family scale (IOFS) in families of school-age children with severe food allergies (SFA) in Spain.

DESIGN/METHODS

A total of 299 families from south Spain were assessed using the IOFS. A factorial analysis was conducted to analyze the construct validity. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Additionally, a multivariate analysis was conducted to study the association between the impact of the illness on families and some variables.

RESULTS

The internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.87 (95% CI) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.90. Regarding the results of the IOFS, the overall average score was 61.9 (SD = 12.4). The family-social impact subscale obtained the highest score. The number of children and the number of workers within the family showed a significance that was directly proportional to the family impact.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish version of the IOFS is a reliable and valid tool to assess the impact of severe food allergies on families. In addition, the results point out SFA as a problem with medium-high family impact and important family availability needs.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The impact on families of severe food allergy of children has become evident, therefore, the healthcare staff should pay close attention to this issue and take the required measures to reduce this impact.

The impact of cleft lip and/or palate on parental quality of life: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/CP/CLP) is one of the most common congenital anomalies. Children may suffer from a variety of health problems including difficulties with feeding and speech, middle ear problems, hearing loss and associated psychosocial concerns. The extent of impact of this disorder on the parents, however, has not yet been thoroughly evaluated. This pilot study was performed to evaluate the impact of having a child with CL/CP/CLP on the parents' quality of life (QoL) and family functioning and to compare between cleft subgroups.

METHODS

Forty-five parents with children aged 6 months to 6 years with CL/CP/CLP, followed by the multidisciplinary orofacial cleft team of Ghent University Hospital, completed following standardized questionnaires: Impact on Family Scale (IOFS), Family Impact Scale (FIS) and Care-Related Quality of Life Instrument (CarerQoL). Subgroups were compared with diverse unpaired statistical tests.

RESULTS

Younger children (6m-2y) with CL/CP/CLP entail more impact on parental QoL compared to children aged 2-4y old (p=0.04, ε²=0.15/p=0.02, ε²=0.17/p=0.02, ε²=0.17). Families from children with a syndromic cleft also encounter more impact (p=0.04, r=0.32 /p=0.01, r=0.37 /p=0.008, r=0.40/p=0.003, r=0.45). Prenatal orofacial cleft diagnosis is associated with a higher reporting of family conflicts (p=0.04, r=0.32). In case of non-syndromic clefts, families having children with CLP report more family conflicts compared to CL or CP (p=0.02, ε²=0.46). Parental education and number of children within the household showed no significant impact on parental QoL.

CONCLUSION

This cross-sectional study confirms that having a child with CL/CP/CLP impacts the parental QoL. This study was performed as a pilot-study for larger multicentre studies, future development of effective screening tools and identification of subgroups at risk. Long-term multidisciplinary follow-up should involve family-centred support.

The impact on family scale: psychometric analysis of long and short forms in parents of children with epilepsy

Epilepsy in a child or adolescent can have severe psychosocial impact on the whole family and burdens them, especially the parents. As the familial background is essential for the child's coping and the progression of the epilepsy, parental burden should be considered within a comprehensive treatment approach. This study validated the applicability of the Impact on Family Scale (IOFS), a well-established instrument that assesses the strains of families with chronically ill or disabled children, in parents of children with epilepsy. In a sample of 219 parents, the psychometric properties of the original IOFS version (33 items) and two short forms (15 and 11 items, respectively) were examined. Both short forms revealed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability), and construct validity was verified by correlations with epilepsy- and burden-related variables. However, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated superior characteristics of the short form with 11 items (IOFS-11). In conclusion, the IOFS-11 as well as the IOFS-15 proved to be practicable, reliable, and valid tools to assess the impact of childhood epilepsy on family life in research and clinical practice.