Does mammary ductoscopy have a role in clinical practice?

Diagnostic value of endoscopic appearance during ductoscopy in patients with pathological nipple discharge

Background

To explore the features of ductoscopic appearance that may be diagnostic in patients with pathologic nipple discharge (PND) and to discuss the diagnostic criteria for intraductal tumors.

Methods

We reviewed 247 patients with PND but without a palpable mass who were evaluated using either surgical biopsy or excision. Data concerning patient age, duration of discharge, discharge color, and the details of endoscopic appearance were analyzed according to the pathological results.

Results

The postoperative diagnosis in 61 patients (24.70%) was a nonmass lesion, and 186 patients (76.52%) had an intraductal tumor. Among those with intraductal lesions, 10 patients (4.05%) had a malignant tumor, including 4 (1.62%) with ductal carcinoma in situ and 6 (2.43%) with invasive ductal carcinoma. On univariate analysis, patients of older age with spontaneous and bloody discharge were more likely to suffer from intraductal lesions. On logistic regression analysis, bloody nipple discharge, morphology, and a broad lesion base revealed by ductoscopy showed a statistically significant correlation with malignancy (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.022, respectively).

Conclusions

Both clinical features and endoscopic appearance are significant for the precise diagnosis of an intraductal lesion seen on ductoscopy. The endoscopic features of bloody discharge, morphology, and a broad lesion base are independent risk factors for malignancy and represent new criteria for the diagnosis of patients with PND.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3288-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Mammary ductoscopy and follow-up avoid unnecessary duct excision in patients with pathologic nipple discharge

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ductoscopy and follow-up for the diagnoses of intraductal lesions and the concomitant advantages of avoiding surgery for patients with pathologic nipple discharge (PND).

METHODS

Two hundred and sixty-six ductoscopies were performed for 238 women. Patients with positive ductoscopies underwent surgery. If no positive lesions were present upon ductoscopy, the women were followed.

RESULTS

Of 266 ductoscopic examinations, 168 (63.2%, 168/266) breasts from 165 patients were found to have positive images. The final histopathological results revealed that 93 patients with intraductal papilloma, 42 with intraductal papillomatosis, 15 with ADH lesions, DCIS in 9 patients, 1 case with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), 6 cases with duct ectasia, and 2 cases with inflammation. Seventy-three patients with negative results upon ductoscopy were followed with a median time of 48 months. Twelve patients had PND recurrence and were diagnosed as papilloma or papillomatosis based on pathology after surgery. PND disappeared for 51 patients after ductoscopy, and no recurrence or disease evolvement was founded for them.

CONCLUSION

Ductoscopy and follow-up were advantageous for selecting patients to undergo surgery or surveillance. The recurrence of PND after ductoscopy might be a strong predictor for having intraductal disease.

A nomogram based on mammary ductoscopic indicators for evaluating the risk of breast cancer in intraductal neoplasms with nipple discharge

Mammary ductoscopy (MD) is commonly used to detect intraductal lesions associated with nipple discharge. This study investigated the relationships between ductoscopic image-based indicators and breast cancer risk, and developed a nomogram for evaluating breast cancer risk in intraductal neoplasms with nipple discharge. A total of 879 consecutive inpatients (916 breasts) with nipple discharge who underwent selective duct excision for intraductal neoplasms detected by MD from June 2008 to April 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. A nomogram was developed using a multivariate logistic regression model based on data from a training set (687 cases) and validated in an independent validation set (229 cases). A Youden-derived cut-off value was assigned to the nomogram for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Color of discharge, location, appearance, and surface of neoplasm, and morphology of ductal wall were independent predictors for breast cancer in multivariate logistic regression analysis. A nomogram based on these predictors performed well. The P value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for the prediction model was 0.36. Area under the curve values of 0.812 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.763-0.860) and 0.738 (95 % CI 0.635-0.841) was obtained in the training and validation sets, respectively. The accuracies of the nomogram for breast cancer diagnosis were 71.2 % in the training set and 75.5 % in the validation set. We developed a nomogram for evaluating breast cancer risk in intraductal neoplasms with nipple discharge based on MD image findings. This model may aid individual risk assessment and guide treatment in clinical practice.

Mammary ductoscopy and watchful follow-up substitute microdochectomy in patients with bloody nipple discharge

PURPOSE

In order to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of mammary ductoscopy and watchful follow-up for treating bloody nipple discharge, we investigated the incidence of cancer evolving from the location related to the affected duct and the disappearance of nipple discharge.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1998 and March 2008, we assessed 709 lesions among 624 patients without a diagnosis of malignancy at the time of 6 months after mammary ductoscopy. The median follow-up time was 5.5 years. We reviewed the subjects' charts retrospectively and investigated the dates on which discharge-related cancer was diagnosed and the disappearance of discharge was noted after the initial examination with mammary ductoscopy.

RESULTS

The incidence of cancer evolving from the location related to the pathological duct was 11 % (78/709). Nipple discharge disappeared in 480 (85.1 %) of the 564 followed up lesions, with the exception of 78 breast cancers and 67 resected benign lesions. The rate of disappearance for nipple discharge in the cases of intraductal papilloma at the first examination was 82.5 %. In cases in which no obvious lesions were observed on mammary ductoscopy, there was a 90 % probability that the nipple discharge would disappear, and the rate of evolving breast cancer in the cases of atypical papillary lesions at the first examination was significantly higher than that observed in the cases of intraductal papilloma, at 50 and 8.9 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Information revealed by mammary ductoscopy is useful for differentiating patients who should be subjected to intensive examinations and those who should expect disappearance of their discharge. Mammary ductoscopy and watchful follow-up can substitute microdochectomy in patients with bloody nipple discharge.

Biology and treatment of ductal carcinomain situ

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is responsible for 25% of screen-detected breast cancers. Various prognostic classifications are in use, including the Van Nuys Prognostic Index and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer grading system (well, intermediate or poorly differentiated) based on cytonuclear pattern. This has been modified in screening programs to low, intermediate and high grade. In comparison with normal epithelium, DCIS has a tenfold increase in growth and 15-fold increase in apoptosis. Patients with extensive or multifocal DCIS need mastectomy and sentinel node biopsy, together with reconstruction, if requested. Microinvasion associated with DCIS is an indication for sentinel node biopsy. Randomized trials have confirmed the value of breast irradiation after wide excision, in terms of DCIS relapse and progression to invasive disease. Patients with estrogen receptor-positive DCIS benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen after breast-conserving surgery.

Nipple discharge: an early warning sign of breast cancer

Nipple discharge (ND) can be the earliest presenting symptom of breast cancer. We hereby present two cases of breast cancer with no palpable mass manifesting as isolated ND, which was whitish in color. In both cases, cytology of the discharge revealed highly pleomorphic cells indicating a high grade malignancy. Mammography showed diffuse, extensive microcalcifications. Simple mastectomy with axillary clearance was done. Histology in both cases revealed diffusely spreading intraductal carcinoma, with focus of microinvasion in one case. ND if scanty or not blood stained is often ignored by the patients and at times, the clinicians. This article highlights that ND can be an early warning sign of intraductal carcinomas that are non-invasive in early stage. Irrespective of the color or nature of the discharge, unilateral ND needs to be evaluated. Proper clinical assessment, cytological evaluation of the ND, and mammography ought to be performed in all such cases. Considering the low level of awareness in women regarding the warning signs of breast cancer, the current focus is to create "breast awareness." Women should be sensitized to recognize any unusual changes in their breasts and report to their health care providers at the earliest.

Ductoscopy in the evaluation and management of nipple discharge

BACKGROUND

Nipple discharge is a relatively common complaint among patients visiting specialized outpatient clinics for disease of the breast. With advancing technology, it became possible to diagnose and manage nipple discharge using minimally invasive procedures. The aim of this study is to report our experience with ductoscopic evaluation of patients with nipple discharge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between September 2005 and February 2009, 236 patients with complaint of nipple discharge were admitted prospectively into the study. All patients were evaluated with ductoscopy. Data concerning age, ductoscopic and postsurgical diagnosis, duration, and complications with the procedure were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

For 236 patients evaluated, there were 249 ductoscopic investigations. Of these, 39 patients were found to have intraductal solitary papilloma of which 24 were excised ductoscopically. Of the 24 ductoscopically excised solitary papillomas, it was possible to remove 17 completely, but 7 papillomas could be removed partially. For 13 patients with solitary papillomas large enough or unfavorably localized so that they could not be snare-excised and for 14 patients with multiple papillomas, we offered surgical removal of the lesions by limited excision of the ducts with the help of ductoscopic localization and marking. There were 35 patients who had debris within the canalicular system, and the debris was washed out. Ductoscopy revealed atypical ductal hyperplasia in 3 patients, ductal carcinoma in situ in 6 patients, and invasive carcinoma in 3 patients; all patients underwent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that, as the technology quickly improves, ductoscopy will become more widely accepted and applied for breast disorders, not only as a diagnostic tool but also as a privileged therapeutic option for certain pathologies.

Mammary ductoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of pathologic nipple discharge: a Canadian experience

BACKGROUND

Mammary ductoscopy allows direct visualization of ductal epithelium using a fibreoptic microendoscope. As the first centre in Canada to apply ductoscopy to surgical practice, we report our experience with this technology.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2008, 65 women with pathologic nipple discharge underwent ductoscopy before surgical duct excision under general anesthetic. Prospective data collection included cannulation and complication rates, procedure length and lesion visualization rate compared with preoperative ductography, if performed. In addition, we classified the endoscopic appearance according to Makita and colleagues and correlated it with surgical pathology.

RESULTS

It took longer than 6 months to overcome technical problems before the routine use of ductoscopy in the operating room. The ductoscope was easy to use: we achieved cannulation in 63 of 66 breast ducts (95%) and we visualized a lesion in 52 of 63 breast ducts (83%). The mean procedure length was 5.1 minutes, with no complications. Lesions seen on ductography were seen endoscopically 30 of 33 (91%) times. All 3 malignancies were seen: invasive carcinoma in 1 of 62 (1.6%) and in situ disease in 2 of 62 (3.2%) patients. Surgeons found ductoscopy helpful in defining the extent of duct excision. Except for the "polypoid solitary" class, which accurately predicted a papilloma (23/23), we found poor correlation between Makita and colleague's endoscopic classification and final pathology.

CONCLUSION

Ductoscopy is feasible, safe and practical. Our surgeons routinely use it to identify the location and extent of duct excision without ordering preoperative ductography. Identifying pathology based on the endoscopic appearance is unreliable unless the lesion is solitary and polypoid.

Selective microdochectomy after ductoscopic wire marking in women with pathological nipple discharge

Background

To investigate the diagnostic reliability of selective microdochectomy after direct ductoscopic wire marking of suspect lesions in patients with pathological nipple discharge.

Methods

Selective microdochectomy due to pathological discharge was performed in 33 patients with mean age of 51.7 years. Ductoscopes of 0.9 and 1.1 mm in diameter with a channel for wire marking were used. Only patients without sonographic or mammographic correlation for the discharge were included. The pathologic mammary duct was wire marked and extirpated under direct visual guidance via the ductoscope. The histological results were compared with cytology, galactography and ductoscopy.

Results

In 24 out of 33 cases (72%) an intraductal, epithelial proliferation was found histologically. The following sensitivities for intraductal, epithelial proliferations could be determined: cytology 4%, galactography 74%, and ductoscopy 78%.

Conclusion

The method allows selective microdochectomy of the pathological duct and the intraductal proliferation under visual guidance. The resection volume can be reduced in contrast to the unselective ductectomy after injection of methylene blue.

Fiberoptic ductoscopy combined with cytology testing in the patients of spontaneous nipple discharge

Fiberoptic ductoscopy system (FDS) offers a safe alternative to ductography in diagnosing intraductal lesions and serves as a guide for subsequent surgery in women with nipple discharge. In this article, we reported the outcomes of FDS combined with cytology testing for diagnosis of spontaneous nipple discharge. From 1997 to 2005, 1,048 women (1,093 breasts total) in the outpatient department underwent successful diagnostic FDS. Discharge was unilateral (86.8%), single ductal (93.4%), and serous (57.9%) or bloody (36.0%). Among 437 (40.0%) of the FDS-positive breasts, we revealed 49 (11.2%) breast carcinomas, 228 (52.2%) central papillomas, and 5 (1.1%) cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia. Ten patients with positive cytology testing received microdochectomy in spite of having a negative FDS, which revealed two additional ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), and four papillomas. About 489 breasts were negative for both FDS and cytology testing and were subjected to follow up. About 77 (15.7%) of the breasts underwent tissue diagnosis within a median follow-up time span of 19 months, and one DCIS was detected. The sensitivity of FDS for detection of malignant lesions was 94.2% and increased to 98.1% when combined with cytology testing. Nevertheless, it was less sensitive (p<0.01) if we used cytology testing only (58.3%), mammography (48.6%), high-frequency sonography (36.4%), or combination of mammography and sonography (56.8%) to detect these malignant lesions. These data confirmed the value of FDS combined with cytology testing as a diagnostic procedure in women with nipple discharge.