'Aspirin resistance' or treatment non-compliance: which is to blame for cardiovascular complications?

Aspirin Responsiveness in a Cohort of Pediatric Patients with Right Ventricle to Pulmonary Artery Conduits and Transcatheter Valve Replacement Systems

The aim of this study was to determine the rate of aspirin responsiveness in a cohort of pediatric patients with in situ xenograft valved right ventricle to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) conduits and/or transcatheter valve replacements (TVR). Aspirin is routinely prescribed to these patients. Optimizing anti-platelet therapy could promote valve longevity and reduce the risk of infective endocarditis in this at-risk group. This was a prospective, observational study. Patients were recruited from both ward and outpatient settings. Patients were eligible if under 18 years and taking aspirin. Non-response to aspirin was defined as > 20% platelet aggregation using light transmission platelet aggregometry (LTA) and < 50% platelet inhibition by thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEGPM). Participants were invited to provide a confirmatory sample in cases of aspirin resistance and dose adjustments were made. Thirty patients participated. Median age was 9 years (2 months to 18 years). The majority (93%) had complex right ventricular outflow tract pathology. 13 (43%) had an RV-PA conduit and 24 (80%) had a TVR, with valve situated in conduit in 7 (23%) cases. Rate of aspirin non-response on initial testing was 23% (n = 7/30) with median LTA 74.55% (60-76%) and TEG 13.25% (0-44%) in non-responders. Non-responders were more likely to be under 1 year. Two patients required dose increases and one patient non-adherence to dose was identified. Four patients on repeat testing were responsive to aspirin by laboratory tests. The rate of aspirin non-response on laboratory testing in this cohort of patients was 23% and resulted in therapeutic intervention in 10%.

Aspirin Use and Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement, the Need for Consistency

Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) is a staple in the pediatric cardiac catheterization lab. Despite the ubiquitous use of this procedure, guidelines for antithrombosis post pulmonary valve replacement are non-existent. A survey was sent out via email to the members of the Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium (CCISC) and the Pediatric and Adult Interventional Cardiac Symposium (PICS-AICS). Responses were received from 109 cardiologists who perform this procedure. Following TPVR 76.5% of respondents use only Aspirin, while the remainder prescribe a second antithrombotic agent at discharge. The majority (78%) of respondents do not educate patients about avoiding enteric formulations of aspirin, and another 86% do not educate patients about the need to avoid proton pump inhibitors (PPI). In addition, 67% do not advise against concomitant use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs). Lastly, the survey showed a wide discrepancy in prescribed dose with 56% choosing to always prescribe 70-100 mg regardless of weight, 28% choosing to do weight-based dosing, and 7.5% choosing 325 mg regardless of weight. In a survey sent out to pediatric cardiac interventionalists worldwide, a significant discrepancy was noted in antithrombotic regimens used following TPVR. We hypothesize that these discrepancies may contribute to early valve failure and suggest the need for further study and the development of unified antithrombosis guidelines following TPVR.

Association of the coronary artery disease risk gene GUCY1A3 with ischaemic events after coronary intervention

Aim

A common genetic variant at the GUCY1A3 coronary artery disease locus has been shown to influence platelet aggregation. The risk of ischaemic events including stent thrombosis varies with the efficacy of aspirin to inhibit platelet reactivity. This study sought to investigate whether homozygous GUCY1A3 (rs7692387) risk allele carriers display higher on-aspirin platelet reactivity and risk of ischaemic events early after coronary intervention.

Methods and results

The association of GUCY1A3 genotype and on-aspirin platelet reactivity was analysed in the genetics substudy of the ISAR-ASPI registry (n = 1678) using impedance aggregometry. The clinical outcome cardiovascular death or stent thrombosis within 30 days after stenting was investigated in a meta-analysis of substudies of the ISAR-ASPI registry, the PLATO trial (n = 3236), and the Utrecht Coronary Biobank (n = 1003) comprising a total 5917 patients. Homozygous GUCY1A3 risk allele carriers (GG) displayed increased on-aspirin platelet reactivity compared with non-risk allele (AA/AG) carriers [150 (interquartile range 91–209) vs. 134 (85–194) AU⋅min, P < 0.01]. More homozygous risk allele carriers, compared with non-risk allele carriers, were assigned to the high-risk group for ischaemic events (>203 AU⋅min; 29.5 vs. 24.2%, P = 0.02). Homozygous risk allele carriers were also at higher risk for cardiovascular death or stent thrombosis (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.08–2.68; P = 0.02). Bleeding risk was not altered.

Conclusion

We conclude that homozygous GUCY1A3 risk allele carriers are at increased risk of cardiovascular death or stent thrombosis within 30 days after coronary stenting, likely due to higher on-aspirin platelet reactivity. Whether GUCY1A3 genotype helps to tailor antiplatelet treatment remains to be investigated.

Clinical Implications of Changes in Individual Platelet Reactivity to Aspirin Over Time in Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Time-dependent changes in individual platelet reactivity have been detected in patients with coronary artery disease. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the time-dependent changes in platelet reactivity to aspirin during the acute stage after ischemic stroke and the clinical implications of variable patient responses to aspirin in acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, prospective, observational study. The acute aspirin reaction unit (ARU) was measured after 3 hours of aspirin loading, with higher values indicating increased platelet reactivity despite aspirin therapy. The follow-up ARU was measured on the fifth day of consecutive aspirin intake. The numeric difference between the follow-up ARU and the acute ARU was defined as ΔARU and was stratified into quartiles. Early neurological deterioration was regarded as an early clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Both the acute ARU (476±69 IU) and the follow-up ARU (451±68 IU) were measured in 349 patients in this study. Early neurological deterioration was observed in 72 patients (20.6%). Changes in aspirin platelet reactivity over time showed an approximately Gaussian distribution. The highest ΔARU quartile was independently associated with early neurological deterioration (odds ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-7.10; P=0.005) by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study showed that the increase in platelet reactivity to aspirin over time is independently associated with early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke. In addition, during the acute stage of ischemic stroke, serial platelet reactivity assays may be more useful than a single assay for identifying the clinical implications of aspirin platelet reactivity after ischemic stroke.

Mechanisms of aspirin resistance

Aspirin is integral to the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and acts to impair the development of platelet-mediated atherothromboembolic events by irreversible inhibition of platelet cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1). Inhibition of this enzyme prevents the synthesis of the potent pro-aggregatory prostanoid thromboxane A2. A large number of patients continue to experience atherothromboembolic events despite aspirin therapy, so-called 'aspirin treatment failure', and this is multifactorial in aetiology. Approximately 10% however do not respond appropriately to aspirin in a phenomenon known as 'aspirin resistance', which is defined by various laboratory techniques. In this review we discuss the reasons for aspirin resistance in a systematic manner, starting from prescription of the drug and ending at the level of the platelet. Poor medication adherence has been shown to be a cause of apparent aspirin resistance, and may in fact be the largest contributory factor. Also important is high platelet turnover due to underlying inflammatory processes, such as atherosclerosis and its complications, leading to faster regeneration of platelets, and hence of COX-1, at a rate that diminishes the efficacy of once daily dosing. Recent developments include the identification of platelet glycoprotein IIIa as a potential biomarker (as well as possible underlying mechanism) for aspirin resistance and the discovery of an anion efflux pump that expels intracellular aspirin from platelets. The absolute as well as relative contributions of such factors to the phenomenon of aspirin resistance are the subject of continuing research.

Antiplatelet therapy: aspirin resistance and all that jazz!

Platelets play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and stroke. Aspirin used alone or in combination with other antiplatelet drugs has been shown to offer significant benefit to patients at high risk of vascular events. Resistance to the action of aspirin may decrease this benefit. Aspirin resistance has been defined by clinical and/or laboratory criteria; however, detection by laboratory methods prior to experiencing a clinical event will likely provide the greatest opportunity for intervention. Numerous laboratory methods with different cutoff points have been used to evaluate the resistance. Noncompliance with aspirin treatment has also confounded studies. A single assay is currently insufficient to establish resistance. Combinations of results to confirm compliance and platelet inhibition may identify "at-risk" individuals who truly have aspirin resistance. The most effective strategy for managing patients with aspirin resistance is unknown; however, studies are currently underway to address this issue.

2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines reflect published literature. Because of the ever changing literature base, it is necessary to update and revise guideline recommendations from time to time. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons recommends review and possible update of previously published guidelines at least every three years. This summary is an update of the blood conservation guideline published in 2007.

METHODS

The search methods used in the current version differ compared to the previously published guideline. Literature searches were conducted using standardized MeSH terms from the National Library of Medicine PUBMED database list of search terms. The following terms comprised the standard baseline search terms for all topics and were connected with the logical 'OR' connector--Extracorporeal circulation (MeSH number E04.292), cardiovascular surgical procedures (MeSH number E04.100), and vascular diseases (MeSH number C14.907). Use of these broad search terms allowed specific topics to be added to the search with the logical 'AND' connector.

RESULTS

In this 2011 guideline update, areas of major revision include: 1) management of dual anti-platelet therapy before operation, 2) use of drugs that augment red blood cell volume or limit blood loss, 3) use of blood derivatives including fresh frozen plasma, Factor XIII, leukoreduced red blood cells, platelet plasmapheresis, recombinant Factor VII, antithrombin III, and Factor IX concentrates, 4) changes in management of blood salvage, 5) use of minimally invasive procedures to limit perioperative bleeding and blood transfusion, 6) recommendations for blood conservation related to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiopulmonary perfusion, 7) use of topical hemostatic agents, and 8) new insights into the value of team interventions in blood management.

CONCLUSIONS

Much has changed since the previously published 2007 STS blood management guidelines and this document contains new and revised recommendations.

Persistent erythema with niacin is not attributable to aspirin resistance

BACKGROUND

Niacin is suboptimally used in patients because it causes flushing and erythema. These side effects have been attributed to release of the vasodilating prostaglandin D2, generated in a reaction catalyzed by cyclooxygenase-1. Aspirin reduces but does not completely eliminate these side effects. Because some patients are resistant to its antiplatelet effects, we hypothesized that patients with persistent niacin-induced erythema might be aspirin resistant.

METHODS

Platelet function studies (via the use of a whole-blood platelet function aggregometer [VerifyNow; Accumetrics, San Diego, CA] with end points of aspirin reaction unit [ARUs] and P2Y12 reaction units [PRUs]) were performed on 32 healthy, drug-free subjects before and after 324 mg of aspirin. A niacin skin test with the use of topical methylnicotinate was also performed before and after the administration of aspirin. Responses to methyl nicotinate were assessed by a reaction score and by counting the time to first visible redness (TTR).

RESULTS

All subjects had an expected decrease in arachidonic acid induced platelet response (ARU 642.8 ± 47.20 before to 431.5 ± 41.1 after aspirin, P < .0001) without a significant change in the PRU. The reaction score and TTR were prolonged by aspirin at methylnicotinate concentrations ≥ 0.001 M. Although no subject had aspirin resistance (defined as ARU > 550), there was considerable variability in skin responses with erythema elicited in all subjects at the greatest concentrations. There was no difference in the ARU for subjects with TTR values above and below the mean, indicating that aspirin resistance does not explain the variation in skin responses to a topical niacin derivative.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin resistance is unlikely to be a significant contributor to the persistent erythema and flushing in niacin-treated patients.

Aspirin therapy and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus

The benefits of aspirin therapy in reducing the subsequent risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and death is well documented in individuals with cardiovascular disease including those with diabetes mellitus (DM). The evidence for aspirin use in primary prevention of cardiovascular events in DM is debatable and meta-analyses do not suggest a proven benefit. Despite the lack of evidence, low-dose aspirin therapy has been recommended by many current diabetes guidelines. This article reviews the results of two recently published large randomized clinical trials that have looked at primary prevention of cardiovascular events using aspirin in patients with DM.

Antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in patients with aspirin therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions--limited inhibition of the P2Y12 receptor

INTRODUCTION

Large individual variability in clopidogrel responses has been reported. However, mechanisms of the non-responsiveness are unclear. Our aim was to study the extent of platelet inhibition at the receptor level by in vitro receptor antagonists of P2Y(12) (AR-C69931MX, cangrelor) and P2Y(1) (adenosine 3',5'diphosphate) in aspirin treated patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) prior to and after in vivo clopidogrel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

51 aspirin-treated (100 mg/day) patients participated. Blood was collected before and after administration of clopidogrel at 300 mg loading dose on day one, followed by 75 mg/d for four days. Aggregation in platelet-rich plasma was assessed.

RESULTS

In 20% of patients clopidogrel failed to inhibit platelet responses to ADP. These non-responders had also decreased sensitivity to an in vitro P2Y(12)-receptor antagonist compared with the responders (mean inhibition of aggregation 25 vs. 32%, difference of means 7% (95% CI 2-12%), P<0.02). Moreover, the P2Y(12)-receptor inhibition by in vivo clopidogrel correlated with the inhibition by in vitro ARMX measured prior to administration of clopidogrel. Neither P2Y(1)-receptor activity, thrombin generation while on aspirin nor basal platelet activity associated with clopidogrel responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant aspirin and clopidogrel treatment failed to suppress platelet activity in 20% of patients. Non-responders to clopidogrel had decreased responses also to another ADP receptor antagonist, which suggests that the impaired response occurs at the level of P2Y(12)-receptor.