1
|
Ringl F, Stadler M, van Dongen KA, Adib Razavi M, Saalmüller A, Mair KH. Solving technical issues in flow cytometry to characterize porcine CD8α/β expressing lymphocytes. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2024; 278:110853. [PMID: 39500097 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2024.110853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2024] [Revised: 10/13/2024] [Accepted: 10/21/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
The CD8 molecule is a cell surface receptor and well described as co-receptor on T cells, binding directly to the major histocompatibility complex class I on antigen presenting cells. CD8 antigens are comprised of two distinct polypeptide chains, the α and the β chain. In the pig, the CD8 receptor is expressed by several lymphocyte subsets, including Natural Killer cells, γδ T cells and antigen experienced CD4+ αβ T cells. On these cell populations CD8 is expressed as αα homodimers. Porcine cytolytic T cells on the other hand exclusively express CD8 αβ heterodimers. Several monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for either of the two chains are available and are frequently used in flow cytometry. We observed that distinct combinations of mAb clones for CD8α and CD8β chains can cause troubles in multi-color staining panels. Therefore, we aimed for an in-depth study of the usage of different CD8-specific mAb clones and optimizing co-staining strategies for flow cytometry. We tested mAb clones 11/295/33 and 76-2-11 for the detection of CD8α and mAb clones PPT23 and PG164A for the detection of CD8β. The results indicate that the CD8α clone 11/295/33 should not be used together with either of the two CD8β clones in the same incubation step, as co-staining led to a highly reduced ability of CD8β mAb binding and loss in signal in flow cytometry. This can lead to potential false results in detecting CD8αβ cytolytic T cells. In case of the CD8α mAb clone 76-2-11, no inhibition in binding of either CD8β mAb clones was observed, making it the preferred choice in multi-color staining panels. The obtained data will help in future panel designs for flow cytometry in the pig and therefore improving studies of porcine immune cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Ringl
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Optimized Prediction of Vaccination Success in Pigs, Immunology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maria Stadler
- Immunology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katinka A van Dongen
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Optimized Prediction of Vaccination Success in Pigs, Immunology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mahsa Adib Razavi
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Optimized Prediction of Vaccination Success in Pigs, Immunology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Armin Saalmüller
- Immunology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kerstin H Mair
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Optimized Prediction of Vaccination Success in Pigs, Immunology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Immunology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tian L, Nelson AR, Lowe T, Weaver L, Yuan C, Wang HW, DeRose P, Stetler-Stevenson M, Wang L. Standardization of flow cytometric detection of antigen expression. CYTOMETRY. PART B, CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2024; 106:25-34. [PMID: 38217297 PMCID: PMC10922571 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.22155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
Since response to antigen-based immunotherapy relies upon the level of tumor antigen expression we developed an antigen quantification assay using ABC values. Antigen quantification as a clinical assay requires methods for quality control and for interlaboratory and inter-cytometer platform standardization. A single lot of Cytotrol™ Lyophilized Control Cells (Beckman Coulter) used for all studies. The variability in antigen quantification across 4 different instrument platforms in 2 separate laboratories was evaluated. The effect of the antibody clone utilized, importance of custom 1:1 molar ratio (fluorophore to protein, F/P) verses off-the-shelf antibodies, and QuantiBrite PE calibration verses linearity calibration combined with a single point scale transformation with CD4 as reference were determined. Use of single lot control cells allowed validation of reproducibility between flow cytometer platforms and laboratories and allowed assessment of different antibody lots, cocktail preparation, and different antibody clones. Off the shelf antibody preparations provide reproducible estimates of antigen density, however custom 1:1 unimolar antibody preparations should be utilized for definitive measurement of antigen expression.Geometric Mean fluorescent Intensity (GeoMFI) was not comparable across instruments and inter-laboratory. The use of CD4 as the reference marker can minimize variability in ABC values. Comparable antigen quantification is vital in managing patients receiving antigen-based immunotherapy. If this assay is to be utilized in a clinical setting, quality control methods have to be instituted to assure reproducibility and allow validation across laboratories. We have demonstrated that use of a lyophilized cell control is highly valuable in achieveing these goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linhua Tian
- Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - Aaron R Nelson
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Tyler Lowe
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Linda Weaver
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Constance Yuan
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Hao-Wei Wang
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul DeRose
- Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Lili Wang
- Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jenner AL, Smalley M, Goldman D, Goins WF, Cobbs CS, Puchalski RB, Chiocca EA, Lawler S, Macklin P, Goldman A, Craig M. Agent-based computational modeling of glioblastoma predicts that stromal density is central to oncolytic virus efficacy. iScience 2022; 25:104395. [PMID: 35637733 PMCID: PMC9142563 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are emerging cancer immunotherapy. Despite notable successes in the treatment of some tumors, OV therapy for central nervous system cancers has failed to show efficacy. We used an ex vivo tumor model developed from human glioblastoma tissue to evaluate the infiltration of herpes simplex OV rQNestin (oHSV-1) into glioblastoma tumors. We next leveraged our data to develop a computational, model of glioblastoma dynamics that accounts for cellular interactions within the tumor. Using our computational model, we found that low stromal density was highly predictive of oHSV-1 therapeutic success, suggesting that the efficacy of oHSV-1 in glioblastoma may be determined by stromal-to-tumor cell regional density. We validated these findings in heterogenous patient samples from brain metastatic adenocarcinoma. Our integrated modeling strategy can be applied to suggest mechanisms of therapeutic responses for central nervous system cancers and to facilitate the successful translation of OVs into the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrianne L. Jenner
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Sainte-Justine University Hospital Research Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Munisha Smalley
- Division of Engineering in Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - William F. Goins
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Charles S. Cobbs
- Ben and Catherine Ivy Center for Advanced Brain Tumor Treatment, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ralph B. Puchalski
- Ben and Catherine Ivy Center for Advanced Brain Tumor Treatment, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - E. Antonio Chiocca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sean Lawler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul Macklin
- Department of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Aaron Goldman
- Division of Engineering in Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Morgan Craig
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Sainte-Justine University Hospital Research Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Getz M, Wang Y, An G, Asthana M, Becker A, Cockrell C, Collier N, Craig M, Davis CL, Faeder JR, Ford Versypt AN, Mapder T, Gianlupi JF, Glazier JA, Hamis S, Heiland R, Hillen T, Hou D, Islam MA, Jenner AL, Kurtoglu F, Larkin CI, Liu B, Macfarlane F, Maygrundter P, Morel PA, Narayanan A, Ozik J, Pienaar E, Rangamani P, Saglam AS, Shoemaker JE, Smith AM, Weaver JJA, Macklin P. Iterative community-driven development of a SARS-CoV-2 tissue simulator. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2021:2020.04.02.019075. [PMID: 32511322 PMCID: PMC7239052 DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.02.019075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The 2019 novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, is a pathogen of critical significance to international public health. Knowledge of the interplay between molecular-scale virus-receptor interactions, single-cell viral replication, intracellular-scale viral transport, and emergent tissue-scale viral propagation is limited. Moreover, little is known about immune system-virus-tissue interactions and how these can result in low-level (asymptomatic) infections in some cases and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in others, particularly with respect to presentation in different age groups or pre-existing inflammatory risk factors. Given the nonlinear interactions within and among each of these processes, multiscale simulation models can shed light on the emergent dynamics that lead to divergent outcomes, identify actionable "choke points" for pharmacologic interventions, screen potential therapies, and identify potential biomarkers that differentiate patient outcomes. Given the complexity of the problem and the acute need for an actionable model to guide therapy discovery and optimization, we introduce and iteratively refine a prototype of a multiscale model of SARS-CoV-2 dynamics in lung tissue. The first prototype model was built and shared internationally as open source code and an online interactive model in under 12 hours, and community domain expertise is driving regular refinements. In a sustained community effort, this consortium is integrating data and expertise across virology, immunology, mathematical biology, quantitative systems physiology, cloud and high performance computing, and other domains to accelerate our response to this critical threat to international health. More broadly, this effort is creating a reusable, modular framework for studying viral replication and immune response in tissues, which can also potentially be adapted to related problems in immunology and immunotherapy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Establishing CD19 B-cell reference control materials for comparable and quantitative cytometric expression analysis. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0248118. [PMID: 33740004 PMCID: PMC7978366 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In the field of cell-based therapeutics, there is a great need for high-quality, robust, and validated measurements for cell characterization. Flow cytometry has emerged as a critically important platform due to its high-throughput capability and its ability to simultaneously measure multiple parameters in the same sample. However, to assure the confidence in measurement, well characterized biological reference materials are needed for standardizing clinical assays and harmonizing flow cytometric results between laboratories. To date, the lack of adequate reference materials, and the complexity of the cytometer instrumentation have resulted in few standards. This study was designed to evaluate CD19 expression in three potential biological cell reference materials and provide a preliminary assessment of their suitability to support future development of CD19 reference standards. Three commercially available human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from three different manufacturers were tested. Variables that could potentially contribute to the differences in the CD19 expression, such as PBMCs manufacturing process, number of healthy donors used in manufacturing each PBMC lot, antibody reagent, operators, and experimental days were included in our evaluation. CD19 antibodies bound per cell (ABC) values were measured using two flow cytometry-based quantification schemes with two independent calibration methods, a single point calibration using a CD4 reference cell and QuantiBrite PE bead calibration. Three lots of PBMC from three different manufacturers were obtained. Each lot of PBMC was tested on three different experimental days by three operators using three different lots of unimolar anti-CD19PE conjugates. CD19 ABC values were obtained in parallel on a selected lot of the PBMC samples using mass spectrometry (CyTOF) with two independent calibration methods, EQ4 and bead-based calibration were evaluated with CyTOF-technology. Including all studied variabilities such as PBMC lot, antibody reagent lot, and operator, the averaged mean values of CD19 ABC for the three PBMC manufacturers (A,B, and C) obtained by flow cytometry were found to be: 7953 with a %CV of 9.0 for PBMC-A, 10535 with a %CV of 7.8 for PBMC-B, and 12384 with a %CV of 16 for PBMC-C. These CD19 ABC values agree closely with the findings using CyTOF. The averaged mean values of CD19 ABC for the tested PBMCs is 9295 using flow cytometry-based method and 9699 using CyTOF. The relative contributions from various sources of uncertainty in CD19 ABC values were quantified for the flow cytometry-based measurement scheme. This uncertainty analysis suggests that the number of antigens or ligand binding sites per cell in each PBMC preparation is the largest source of variability. On the other hand, the calibration method does not add significant uncertainty to the expression estimates. Our preliminary assessment showed the suitability of the tested materials to serve as PBMC-based CD19+ reference control materials for use in quantifying relevant B cell markers in B cell lymphoproliferative disorders and immunotherapy. However, users should consider the variabilities resulting from different lots of PBMC and antibody reagent when utilizing cell-based reference materials for quantification purposes and perform bridging studies to ensure harmonization between the results before switching to a new lot.
Collapse
|
6
|
Matos DM. Steric hindrance: A practical (and frequently forgotten) problem in flow cytometry. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2020; 100:397-401. [DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Mazza Matos
- Flow Cytometry Section; Cell Processing Center (CPC) Center of Hematology and Hemotherapy of Ceará (HEMOCE) Fortaleza Ceará Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang L, DeRose PC, Inwood SL, Gaigalas AK. Stochastic Reaction-Diffusion Model of the Binding of Monoclonal Antibodies to CD4 Receptors on the Surface of T Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E6086. [PMID: 32846978 PMCID: PMC7504294 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21176086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A stochastic reaction-diffusion model was developed to describe the binding of labeled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to CD4 receptors on the surface of T cells. The mAbs diffused to, adsorbed on, and underwent monovalent and bivalent binding to CD4 receptors on the cell surface. The model predicted the time-dependent nature of all populations involved in the labeling process. At large time, the populations reached equilibrium values, giving the number of antibodies bound to the T cell (ABC) defined as the sum of monovalently and bivalently bound mAbs. The predicted coefficient of variation (CV%) of the (ABC) values translated directly to a corresponding CV% of the measured mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). The predicted CV% was about 0.2% from the intrinsic fluctuations of the stochastic reaction process, about 5% after inclusion of the known fluctuations in the number of available CD4 receptors, and about 11% when fluctuations in bivalent binding affinity were included. The fluorescence detection process is expected to contribute approximately 7%. The abovementioned contributions to CV% sum up to approximately 13%. Work is underway to reconcile the predicted values and the measured values of 17% to 22%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Wang
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA; (L.W.); (P.C.D.); (S.L.I.)
| | - Paul C. DeRose
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA; (L.W.); (P.C.D.); (S.L.I.)
| | - Sarah L. Inwood
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA; (L.W.); (P.C.D.); (S.L.I.)
| | - Adolfas K. Gaigalas
- Fluorescence Spectroscopy Consultant, 2650 Lake Shore Drive, Riviera Beach, FL 33404, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Czechowska K, Lannigan J, Wang L, Arcidiacono J, Ashhurst TM, Barnard RM, Bauer S, Bispo C, Bonilla DL, Brinkman RR, Cabanski M, Chang HD, Chakrabarti L, Chojnowski G, Cotleur B, Degheidy H, Dela Cruz GV, Eck S, Elliott J, Errington R, Filby A, Gagnon D, Gardner R, Green C, Gregory M, Groves CJ, Hall C, Hammes F, Hedrick M, Hoffman R, Icha J, Ivaska J, Jenner DC, Jones D, Kerckhof FM, Kukat C, Lanham D, Leavesley S, Lee M, Lin-Gibson S, Litwin V, Liu Y, Molloy J, Moore JS, Müller S, Nedbal J, Niesner R, Nitta N, Ohlsson-Wilhelm B, Paul NE, Perfetto S, Portat Z, Props R, Radtke S, Rayanki R, Rieger A, Rogers S, Rubbens P, Salomon R, Schiemann M, Sharpe J, Sonder SU, Stewart JJ, Sun Y, Ulrich H, Van Isterdael G, Vitaliti A, van Vreden C, Weber M, Zimmermann J, Vacca G, Wallace P, Tárnok A. Cyt-Geist: Current and Future Challenges in Cytometry: Reports of the CYTO 2018 Conference Workshops. Cytometry A 2020; 95:598-644. [PMID: 31207046 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joanne Lannigan
- Flow Cytometry Core, University of Virginia, School of Medicine, 1300 Jefferson Park Ave., Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Lili Wang
- Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8312, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Judith Arcidiacono
- Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Thomas M Ashhurst
- Sydney Cytometry Facility, Discipline of Pathology, and Ramaciotti Facility for Human Systems Biology; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney and Centenary Institute, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ruth M Barnard
- GlaxoSmithKline, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Herts SG1 2NY, UK
| | - Steven Bauer
- Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Cláudia Bispo
- UCSF Parnassus Flow Cytometry Core Facility, 513 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, California
| | - Diana L Bonilla
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ryan R Brinkman
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Terry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Maciej Cabanski
- Novartis Pharma AG, Fabrikstrasse 10-4.27.02, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Hyun-Dong Chang
- Schwiete-Laboratory Microbiota and Inflammation, German Rheumatism Research Centre Berlin (DRFZ), a Leibniz Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lina Chakrabarti
- Research and Development, MedImmune, an AstraZeneca Company, One Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Grace Chojnowski
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia
| | | | - Heba Degheidy
- Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Gelo V Dela Cruz
- Flow Cytometry Platform, Novo Nordisk Center for Stem Cell Biology - Danstem, University of Copenhagen, 3B Blegdamsvej, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Steven Eck
- Research and Development, MedImmune, an AstraZeneca Company, One Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - John Elliott
- Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8312, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | | | - Andy Filby
- Newcastle University, Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear NE1 7RU, UK
| | | | - Rui Gardner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Flow Cytometry Core, New York, New York
| | | | - Michael Gregory
- Division of Advanced Research Technologies, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Christopher J Groves
- Research and Development, MedImmune, an AstraZeneca Company, One Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | | | - Frederik Hammes
- Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Jaroslav Icha
- Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
| | - Johanna Ivaska
- Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.,Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Dominic C Jenner
- Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Chemical Biological and Radiological Division, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, UK
| | | | - Frederiek-Maarten Kerckhof
- Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Christian Kukat
- FACS & Imaging Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 9b, 50931, Köln, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Lee
- The University California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, California
| | - Sheng Lin-Gibson
- Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8312, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Virginia Litwin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Flow Cytometry Core, New York, New York
| | | | - Jenny Molloy
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK
| | | | - Susann Müller
- Working Group Flow Cytometry, Department of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jakub Nedbal
- Marylou Ingram ISAC Scholar, King's College London, UK
| | - Raluca Niesner
- Marylou Ingram ISAC Scholar, German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nao Nitta
- Department of Chemistry, The University of Tokyo
| | - Betsy Ohlsson-Wilhelm
- SciGro, North Central Office, Foster Plaza 5, Suite 300/PMB 20, 651 Holiday Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicole E Paul
- LMA CyTOF Core, Dana-Faber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen Perfetto
- Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health (NIH), 40 Convent Drive, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ziv Portat
- Weizmann Institute of Science, Life Sciences Core Facilities, Flow Cytometry Unit, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel
| | - Ruben Props
- Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Stefan Radtke
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., Seattle, Washington
| | - Radhika Rayanki
- Research and Development, MedImmune, an AstraZeneca Company, One Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Aja Rieger
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Flow Cytometry Facility, Department of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, University of Alberta, 6-020C Katz Group Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, Canada
| | - Samson Rogers
- TTP plc, Melbourn Science Park, Melbourn, Hertfordshire SG8 6EE, UK
| | - Peter Rubbens
- KERMIT, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Robert Salomon
- Garvan-Weizmann Centre for Cellular Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matthias Schiemann
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - John Sharpe
- Cytonome/ST LLC, 9 Oak Park Drive, Bedford, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jennifer J Stewart
- Flow Contract Site Laboratory, LLC 18323, Bothell, Everett Highway, Suite 110, Bothell, Washington
| | | | - Henning Ulrich
- Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gert Van Isterdael
- VIB Flow Core, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, B-9052, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Caryn van Vreden
- Sydney Cytometry Facility and Ramaciotti Facility for Human Systems Biology, The University of Sydney and Centenary Institute, Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
| | - Michael Weber
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jacob Zimmermann
- Mucosal Immunology and Host-Microbial Mutualism laboratories, Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Paul Wallace
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York
| | - Attila Tárnok
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Department Therapy Validation, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Budzinski L, Schulz AR, Baumgart S, Burns T, Rose T, Hirseland H, Mei HE. Osmium-Labeled Microspheres for Bead-Based Assays in Mass Cytometry. THE JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY 2019; 202:3103-3112. [DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
10
|
Wang L, Gaigalas AK, DeRose PC. A Model for the Binding of Fluorescently Labeled Anti-Human CD4 Monoclonal Antibodies to CD4 Receptors on Human Lymphocytes. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY 2018; 123:1-23. [PMID: 34877142 PMCID: PMC7339780 DOI: 10.6028/jres.123.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The CD4 glycoprotein is a component of the T cell receptor complex which plays an important role in the human immune response. This manuscript describes the measurement and modeling of the binding of fluorescently labeled anti-human CD4 monoclonal antibodies (mAb; SK3 clone) to CD4 receptors on the surface of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). CD4 mAb fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and CD4 mAb allophycoerythrin (APC) conjugates were obtained from commercial sources. Four binding conditions were performed, each with the same PBMC sample and different CD4 mAb conjugate. Each binding condition consisted of the PBMC sample incubated for 30 min in labeling solutions containing progressively larger concentrations of the CD4 mAb-label conjugate. After the incubation period, the cells were re-suspended in PBS-based buffer and analyzed using a flow cytometer to measure the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the labeled cell populations. A model was developed to estimate the equilibrium concentration of bound CD4 mAb-label conjugates to CD4 receptors on PBMC. A set of parameters was obtained from the best fit of the model to the measured MFI data and the known number of CD4 receptors on PBMC surface. Divalent and monovalent binding had to be invoked for the APC and FITC CD4 mAb conjugates, respectively. This suggests that the mAb binding depends on the size of the label, which has significant implications for quantitative flow cytometry. The study supports the National Institute of Standards and Technology program to develop quantitative flow cytometry measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Wang
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA
| | | | - Paul C DeRose
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hasani-Sadrabadi MM, Majedi FS, Bensinger SJ, Wu BM, Bouchard LS, Weiss PS, Moshaverinia A. Mechanobiological Mimicry of Helper T Lymphocytes to Evaluate Cell-Biomaterials Crosstalk. ADVANCED MATERIALS (DEERFIELD BEACH, FLA.) 2018; 30:e1706780. [PMID: 29682803 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 02/11/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The unique properties of immune cells have inspired many efforts in engineering advanced biomaterials capable of mimicking their behaviors. However, an inclusive model capable of mimicking immune cells in different situations remains lacking. Such models can provide invaluable data for understanding immune-biomaterial crosstalk. Inspired by CD4+ T cells, polymeric microparticles with physicochemical properties similar to naïve and active T cells are engineered. A lipid coating is applied to enhance their resemblance and provide a platform for conjugation of desired antibodies. A novel dual gelation approach is used to tune the elastic modulus and flexibility of particles, which also leads to elongated circulation times. Furthermore, the model is enriched with magnetic particles so that magnetotaxis resembles the chemotaxis of cells. Also, interleukin-2, a proliferation booster, and interferon-γ cytokines are loaded into the particles to manipulate the fates of killer T cells and mesenchymal stem cells, respectively. The penetration of these particles into 3D environments is studied to provide in vitro models of immune-biomaterials crosstalk. This biomimicry model enables optimization of design parameters required for engineering more efficient drug carriers and serves as a potent replica for understanding the mechanical behavior of immune cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Mahdi Hasani-Sadrabadi
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 607 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1569, USA
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 570 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7227, USA
- Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1668, USA
- Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0405, USA
| | - Fatemeh S Majedi
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, 420 Westwood Plaza, 5121 Engineering V, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1600, USA
| | - Steven J Bensinger
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1489, USA
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1735, USA
- The Molecular Biology Institute and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1781, USA
| | - Benjamin M Wu
- Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1668, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, 420 Westwood Plaza, 5121 Engineering V, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1600, USA
| | - Louis-S Bouchard
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 607 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1569, USA
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 570 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7227, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, 420 Westwood Plaza, 5121 Engineering V, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1600, USA
- The Molecular Biology Institute and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1781, USA
| | - Paul S Weiss
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 607 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1569, USA
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 570 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7227, USA
| | - Alireza Moshaverinia
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 570 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7227, USA
- Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1668, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Flow Cytometer Performance Characterization, Standardization, and Control. SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-4499-1_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
13
|
Glassman PM, Balthasar JP. Physiologically-based modeling to predict the clinical behavior of monoclonal antibodies directed against lymphocyte antigens. MAbs 2016; 9:297-306. [PMID: 27892793 DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2016.1261775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Many clinically approved and investigational monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapeutics are directed against proteins located in the systemic circulation, including cytokines, growth factors, lymphocyte proteins, and shed antigens. Interaction between mAb and target may lead to non-linear pharmacokinetics (PK), characterized by rapid, target-mediated elimination. Several groups have reported that determinants of target-mediated elimination could include mAb-target binding, target expression, and target turnover. Recently, we scaled a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for mAb disposition to man and used it to predict the non-linear PK of mAbs directed against tumor epithelial proteins. In this work, we extended the previously described model to account for the influence of lymphocyte proteins on mAb PK in man. To account for the dynamic behavior of lymphocytes in the circulation, lymphocyte cycling between blood and lymphoid organs was described using first-order transfer rate constants. Use of lymphocyte cycling and reported target turnover rates in the model allowed the accurate prediction of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PD) of 4 mAbs (TRX1, MTRX1011a, rituximab, daclizumab) directed against 3 lymphocyte targets (CD4, CD20, CD25). The results described here suggest that the proposed model structure may be useful in the a priori prediction of the PK/PD properties of mAbs directed against antigens in the circulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick M Glassman
- a Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York , Buffalo , NY , USA
| | - Joseph P Balthasar
- a Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York , Buffalo , NY , USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang L, Degheidy H, Abbasi F, Mostowski H, Marti G, Bauer S, Hoffman RA, Gaigalas AK. Quantitative Flow Cytometry Measurements in Antibodies Bound per Cell Based on a CD4 Reference. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 75:1.29.1-1.29.14. [DOI: 10.1002/0471142956.cy0129s75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Wang
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Gaithersburg Maryland
| | - Heba Degheidy
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland
| | - Fatima Abbasi
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland
| | - Howard Mostowski
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland
| | - Gerald Marti
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland
| | - Steven Bauer
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Degheidy H, Abbasi F, Mostowski H, Gaigalas AK, Marti G, Bauer S, Wang L. Consistent, multi-instrument single tube quantification of CD20 in antibody bound per cell based on CD4 reference. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2015; 90:159-67. [DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2014] [Revised: 05/11/2015] [Accepted: 05/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Heba Degheidy
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); Silver Spring Maryland 20993
| | - Fatima Abbasi
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); Silver Spring Maryland 20993
| | - Howard Mostowski
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); Silver Spring Maryland 20993
| | - Adolfas K. Gaigalas
- Biosystems and Biomaterials Division; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); Gaithersburg Maryland 20899
| | - Gerald Marti
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health; FDA; Silver Spring Maryland 20993
| | - Steven Bauer
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); Silver Spring Maryland 20993
| | - Lili Wang
- Biosystems and Biomaterials Division; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); Gaithersburg Maryland 20899
| |
Collapse
|