Amoxicillin-Induced Eosinophilic Pneumonia with Granulomatous Reaction: Discrepancy between Drug-Induced Lymphocyte Stimulation Test Findings and the Provocation Drug Test

Elevated Levels of Intelectin-1, a Pathogen-binding Lectin, in the BAL Fluid of Patients with Chronic Eosinophilic Pneumonia and Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Objective Human intelectin-1 (hITLN-1) binds to galactofuranosyl residues, which are present in the microbial cell wall, but which are absent in mammalian tissues, and has been suggested to play an immunological role against microorganisms. However, the involvement of hITLN-1 in the pathogenesis of diffuse pulmonary diseases remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the hITLN-1 concentrations in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid of patients with diffuse pulmonary diseases. Methods The cell components and concentrations of hITLN-1 were analyzed in the BAL fluid of 8 patients with idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP), 3 patients with drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia, 4 patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), 11 patients with sarcoidosis, 9 patients with cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, and 5 patients with idiopathic fibrosing interstitial pneumonia (fibrosing nonspecific interstitial pneumonia or usual interstitial pneumonia). Results The hITLN-1 concentrations in the BAL fluid of patients with ICEP and HP were higher than in those with other diseases. In the ICEP group, no significant difference was observed in the hITLN-1 concentrations of patients with or without a history of bronchial asthma. Conclusion The results of the present study suggest that hITLN-1 may be involved in the pathogenesis of ICEP and HP, and that an increase in the hITLN-1 concentration in the BAL fluid may represent a new biomarker for these diseases.

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DILD) is not uncommon and has many clinical patterns, ranging from benign infiltrates to life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome. There are two mechanisms involved in DILD, which are probably interdependent: one is direct, dose-dependent toxicity and the other is immune-mediated. Cytotoxic lung injury may result from direct injury to pneumocytes or the alveolar capillary endothelium. Drugs can induce all types of immunological reactions described by Gell and Coombs; however, most reactions in immune-mediated DILD may be T cell-mediated.

DILD can be difficult to diagnose; diagnosis is often possible by exclusion alone. Identifying the causative drug that induces an allergy or cytotoxicity is essential for preventing secondary reactions.

One method to confirm the diagnosis of a drug-induced disease is re-exposure or re-test of the drug. However, clinicians are reluctant to place patients at further risk of illness, particularly in cases with severe drug-induced diseases. Assessment of cell-mediated immunity has recently increased, because verifying the presence or absence of drug-sensitized lymphocytes can aid in confirmation of drug-induced disease. Using peripheral blood samples from drug-allergic patients, the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) and the leukocyte migration test (LMT) can detect the presence of drug-sensitized T cells. However, these tests do not have a definite role in the diagnosis of DILD. This study explores the potential of these new tests and other similar tests in the diagnosis of DILD and provides a review of the relevant literature on this topic.