1
|
Nguyen AT, Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Kortsmit K, Brittain AW, Snyder EM, Cohen MA, Zapata LB, Whiteman MK. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024. MMWR Recomm Rep 2024; 73:1-126. [PMID: 39106314 PMCID: PMC11315372 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7304a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The 2024 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) comprises recommendations for the use of specific contraceptive methods by persons who have certain characteristics or medical conditions. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. MEC (CDC. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016:65[No. RR-3]:1-103). Notable updates include 1) the addition of recommendations for persons with chronic kidney disease; 2) revisions to the recommendations for persons with certain characteristics or medical conditions (i.e., breastfeeding, postpartum, postabortion, obesity, surgery, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism with or without anticoagulant therapy, thrombophilia, superficial venous thrombosis, valvular heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, high risk for HIV infection, cirrhosis, liver tumor, sickle cell disease, solid organ transplantation, and drug interactions with antiretrovirals used for prevention or treatment of HIV infection); and 3) inclusion of new contraceptive methods, including new doses or formulations of combined oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches, vaginal rings, progestin-only pills, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, and vaginal pH modulator. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette T. Nguyen
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kathryn M. Curtis
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Naomi K. Tepper
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Katherine Kortsmit
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anna W. Brittain
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Emily M. Snyder
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Megan A. Cohen
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lauren B. Zapata
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maura K. Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seidman L, Seidman DS, Constantini NW. Hormonal contraception for female athletes presents special needs and concerns. EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2024; 29:8-14. [PMID: 38108091 DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2023.2287960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oral contraceptives (OCs) are commonly used by female athletes raising concerns regarding the possible adverse effects of OCs on physical performance, musculoskeletal injuries, and bone density. We aimed to review all current studies on the physiological effects of OCs in physically active women. MATERIALS AND METHODS A review of literature in electronic search in PubMed and Google Scholar databases from December 2002 to December 2022 using relevant keywords. The reference lists of the articles found eligible were also reviewed. RESULTS Out of 344 articles in the initial database, 54 clinical studies were eligible for inclusion in our literature review. OCs are used by about two-thirds of female athletes. Current research suggests that OCs' effects on endurance performance and muscle strength are mostly reassuring. OCs do not seem to have a major negative impact on bone health or sports injuries. In fact, new data suggests that they may even significantly reduce the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. CONCLUSIONS OCs can be safely used by young female athletes, who may also benefit from better menstrual cycle control. OCs offer newly realised protection from ACL injuries. The use of OCs must be carefully individualised according to their preferences, expectations, and experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liron Seidman
- Soroka Medical School, Soroka University Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Daniel S Seidman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Naama W Constantini
- Heidi Rothberg Sport Medicine Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated to the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garzon S, Laganà AS, Barra F, Casarin J, Cromi A, Raffaelli R, Uccella S, Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Ferrero S. Novel drug delivery methods for improving efficacy of endometriosis treatments. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2020; 18:355-367. [PMID: 32981374 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2021.1829589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pharmacotherapy has a key role in the management of endometriosis. However, a significant proportion of patients gains only intermittent or limited benefits. In this regard, alternative and novel drug delivery methods are of paramount importance to improve efficacy and compliance of available treatments and develop alternative medical approaches. AREAS COVERED This review aims to provide the reader with a complete overview of available evidence about alternative and novel drug delivery methods for endometriosis pharmacotherapy and highlight new research lines. EXPERT OPINION Progestins and estroprogestins, which represent the first-line therapy, are already available in different formulations, being employed for contraception. Nevertheless, evidence on their adoption is still limited for some drug delivery methods, such as vaginal rings, patches, and subcutaneous implants. Further research is needed to define better their clinical utility in patients with endometriosis. Nanotechnologies have been investigated as novel drug delivery methods able to target the drug at the disease level. However, data are very limited and preliminary, and further research is needed to consider a possible clinical application in endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Garzon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Fabio Barra
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (Dinogmi), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Antonella Cromi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Ricciarda Raffaelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Uccella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Franchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (Dinogmi), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Best Practices for Counseling Adolescents about the Etonogestrel Implant. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2020; 33:448-454. [PMID: 32621879 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Among young persons, ease of use, high efficacy, and high acceptability makes the etonogestrel contraceptive implant an important choice for this age group. Adolescent-friendly, patient-centered counseling considers the patient's cognitive development, the influence of friends and family, as well as their own preferences and values. Age-appropriate language, graphics, and models are useful to explain contraceptive options and relevant side effects. Effectiveness, reversibility, safety, noncontraceptive benefits, and side effects are important attributes and should be discussed when teens are choosing a contraceptive method. In this review we describe suggested best practices for counseling adolescents about the etonogestrel implant so they can make informed, prudent decisions about using this contraceptive method.
Collapse
|
5
|
Merki-Feld GS, Bitzer J. Contraception in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Is there evidence for a negative impact of combined hormonal contraceptives on bone mineral density and the course of the disease? EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2020; 25:213-220. [PMID: 32336145 DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1743826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Objective: Adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN) are at increased risk of unplanned pregnancies and bone loss, due to low oestrogen levels and low use of efficient contraception. The negative impact of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) on peak bone mass during adolescence might limit wider use in anorexic women. Another issue limiting CHC use is the concern, that CHC-induced cyclic bleeding reduces the motivation for further weight gain and thus exerts a negative impact on recovery. We wanted to find evidence based answers about the impact of CHC use on bone health and course of the disease in adolescents with AN.Methods: We performed a narrative review of the current literature investigating the effect of CHC or progestin-only contraceptives on bone density, body shape and course of disease in young women with anorexia.Results: There is no evidence that CHC use aggravates the bone loss associated with AN. In long-term users CHC exert a protective effect. Anorexic women using CHC showed at least the same or a greater weight gain in comparison with controls. Eating disorder attitudes did not worsen.Conclusion: We conclude, that at present there is no evidence, that use of CHC by AN patients has a negative impact on bone density or the course of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Johannes Bitzer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barra F, Scala C, Ferrero S. Current understanding on pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety of progestins for treating pain associated to endometriosis. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2018; 14:399-415. [PMID: 29617576 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2018.1461840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endometriosis is a chronic estrogen and progestogen responsive inflammatory disease associated with pain symptoms and infertility. The medical therapy of endometriosis aims to induce decidualization within the hormonally dependent ectopic endometrium, and it is often administered to ameliorate women' pain symptoms or to prevent post-surgical disease recurrence. A variety of progestins have been used in monotherapy for the medical management of women with endometriosis. Areas covered: This review aims to offer the reader a complete overview of pharmacokinetic (PK) and clinical efficacy of progestins for the treatment of endometriosis. Expert opinion: Each progestin has a distinct PK parameters and pharmacodynamics affinity not only for progesterone receptor, but also for other steroid receptors, such as estrogen, androgen, and glucocorticoid. Moreover, progestins can also be delivered in different formulations. All these characteristics influence their final biological effect. Randomized, controlled, non-blinded studies support the use of oral progestin-only treatment for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Currently, the only two progestins approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of endometriosis are norethindrone acetate (NETA) and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Barra
- a Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Ospedale Policlinico San Martino , Genoa , Italy.,b Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI) , University of Genoa , Genoa , Italy
| | - Carolina Scala
- a Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Ospedale Policlinico San Martino , Genoa , Italy.,b Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI) , University of Genoa , Genoa , Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- a Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Ospedale Policlinico San Martino , Genoa , Italy.,b Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI) , University of Genoa , Genoa , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Iltemir Duvan C, Onaran Y, Aktepe Keskin E, Yüce E, Yanık B, Kafali H, Ozturk Turhan N. Effects of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant (Implanon ®) on bone metabolism during lactation: a prospective study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 43:113-117. [PMID: 27908964 DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2015] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the effects of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant (Implanon®) on bone metabolism in lactating women using markers for bone formation and resorption. STUDY DESIGN This single-centre, prospective cohort study was conducted in Turgut Ozal University Medical Faculty Obstetrics and Gynecology Department with healthy lactating women aged between 24 and 38 years to compare the effect on bone metabolism of 6 months' use of either the implant or a non-hormonal contraceptive method. The study group (n=25) used an implant and the control group (n=25) used a non-hormonal contraceptive intrauterine device inserted 40 days' postpartum. Bone metabolism differences at the time of insertion and after 6 months were assessed quantitatively by biochemical analysis of serum and urine samples. RESULTS At baseline, serum levels of bone metabolism parameters were similar for the two groups. In the implant group, serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels decreased (p=0.004) and total protein levels increased (p=0.045) at 6 months. In the control group, serum levels of bone metabolism parameters did not change at 6 months compared to baseline. However, serum levels of phosphorus (p=0.013) and ALP (p=0.003) decreased at 6 months compared to baseline. CONCLUSION Six months' postpartum use of Implanon was found to have no deleterious impact on bone turnover in healthy lactating women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candan Iltemir Duvan
- MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turgut Ozal University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Onaran
- MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turgut Ozal University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Esra Aktepe Keskin
- MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turgut Ozal University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ebru Yüce
- MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turgut Ozal University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burcu Yanık
- MD Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Turgut Ozal University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hasan Kafali
- MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turgut Ozal University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nilgun Ozturk Turhan
- MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turgut Ozal University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman W, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 8 - Progestin-Only Contraception. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2016; 38:279-300. [PMID: 27106200 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide guidelines for health care providers on the use of contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy and on the promotion of healthy sexuality. OUTCOMES Overall efficacy of cited contraceptive methods, assessing reduction in pregnancy rate, safety, ease of use, and side effects; the effect of cited contraceptive methods on sexual health and general well-being; and the relative cost and availability of cited contraceptive methods in Canada. EVIDENCE Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline and The Cochrane Database from January 1994 to January 2015 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., contraception, sexuality, sexual health) and key words (e.g., contraception, family planning, hormonal contraception, emergency contraception). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies published in English from January 1994 to January 2015. Searches were updated on a regular basis in incorporated in the guideline to June 2015. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES The quality of the evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). CHAPTER 8: PROGESTIN-ONLY CONTRACEPTION: Summary Statements Recommendations.
Collapse
|
9
|
Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman WV, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM. Consensus canadien sur la contraception (3e partie de 4) : chapitre 8 – contraception à progestatif seul. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2016; 38:301-26. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
10
|
Body composition and bone mineral density in users of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292:1387-91. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3784-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2015] [Accepted: 06/03/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
11
|
Amico J, Kumar B, Rosenstein H, Gold M. The Contraceptive Implant: An Updated Review of the Evidence. CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s13669-014-0110-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
12
|
Lopez LM, Grimes DA, Schulz KF, Curtis KM, Chen M. Steroidal contraceptives: effect on bone fractures in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD006033. [PMID: 24960023 PMCID: PMC11127753 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006033.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Steroidal contraceptive use has been associated with changes in bone mineral density in women. Whether such changes increase the risk of fractures later in life is not clear. Osteoporosis is a major public health concern. Age-related decline in bone mass increases the risk of fracture, especially of the spine, hip, and wrist. Concern about bone health influences the recommendation and use of these effective contraceptives globally. OBJECTIVES Our aim was to evaluate the effect of using hormonal contraceptives before menopause on the risk of fracture in women. SEARCH METHODS Through April 2014, we searched for studies of fracture or bone health and hormonal contraceptives in MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and LILACS, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. We examined reference lists of relevant articles for other trials. For the initial review, we wrote to investigators to find additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered if they examined fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), or bone turnover markers in women with hormonal contraceptive use prior to menopause. Eligible interventions included comparisons of a hormonal contraceptive with a placebo or with another hormonal contraceptive that differed in terms of drug, dosage, or regimen. They also included providing a supplement to one group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We assessed all titles and abstracts identified through the literature searches. Mean differences were computed using the inverse variance approach. For dichotomous outcomes, the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR) was calculated. Both included the 95% confidence interval (CI) and used a fixed-effect model. Due to differing interventions, no trials could be combined for meta-analysis. We applied principles from GRADE to assess the evidence quality and address confidence in the effect estimates. In addition, a sensitivity analysis included trials that provided sufficient data for this review and evidence of at least moderate quality. MAIN RESULTS We found 19 RCTs that met our eligibility criteria. Eleven trials compared different combined oral contraceptives (COCs) or regimens of COCs; five examined an injectable versus another injectable, implant, or IUD; two studied implants, and one compared the transdermal patch versus the vaginal ring. No trial had fracture as an outcome. BMD was measured in 17 studies and 12 trials assessed biochemical markers of bone turnover. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) was associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD). The placebo-controlled trials showed BMD increases for DMPA plus estrogen supplement and decreases for DMPA plus placebo supplement. COCs did not appear to negatively affect BMD, and some formulations had more positive effects than others. However, no COC trial was placebo-controlled. Where studies showed differences between groups in bone turnover markers, the results were generally consistent with those for BMD. For implants, the single-rod etonogestrel group showed a greater BMD decrease versus the two-rod levonorgestrel group but results were not consistent across all implant comparisons.The sensitivity analysis included 11 trials providing evidence of moderate or high quality. Four trials involving DMPA showed some positive effects of an estrogen supplement on BMD, a negative effect of DMPA-subcutaneous on lumbar spine BMD, and a negative effect of DMPA on a bone formation marker. Of the three COC trials, one had a BMD decrease for the group with gestodene plus EE 15 μg. Another indicated less bone resorption in the group with gestodene plus EE 30 μg versus EE 20 μg. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Whether steroidal contraceptives influence fracture risk cannot be determined from existing information. The evidence quality was considered moderate overall, largely due to the trials of DMPA, implants, and the patch versus ring. The COC evidence varied in quality but was low overall. Many trials had small numbers of participants and some had large losses. Health care providers and women should consider the costs and benefits of these effective contraceptives. For example, injectable contraceptives and implants provide effective, long-term birth control yet do not involve a daily regimen. Progestin-only contraceptives are considered appropriate for women who should avoid estrogen due to medical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laureen M Lopez
- FHI 360Clinical Sciences359 Blackwell St, Suite 200DurhamNorth CarolinaUSA27701
| | - David A Grimes
- University of North Carolina, School of MedicineObstetrics and GynecologyCB#7570Chapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA27599‐7570
| | - Kenneth F Schulz
- FHI 360 and UNC School of MedicineQuantitative Sciences359 Blackwell Street, Suite 200Suite 200DurhamNorth CarolinaUSA27701
| | - Kathryn M. Curtis
- Centers for Disease Control and PreventionDivision of Reproductive HealthMS K‐34, 4770 Buford Highway, NEAtlantaGeorgiaUSA30341
| | - Mario Chen
- FHI 360Division of Biostatistics359 Blackwell St, Suite 200Durham, NCNorth CarolinaUSA27709
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
Yang KY, Kim YS, Ji YI, Jung MH. Changes in Bone Mineral Density of Users of the Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System. J NIPPON MED SCH 2012; 79:190-4. [DOI: 10.1272/jnms.79.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ki Yeol Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee Medical Center, Kyung Hee University
| | - Young Sun Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee Medical Center, Kyung Hee University
| | - Young Il Ji
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University
| | - Min Hyung Jung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee Medical Center, Kyung Hee University
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Steroidal contraceptive use has been associated with changes in bone mineral density in women. Whether such changes increase the risk of fractures later in life is not clear. Osteoporosis is a major public health concern. Age-related decline in bone mass increases the risk of fracture, especially of the spine, hip, and wrist. Concern about bone health influences the recommendation and use of these effective contraceptives globally. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of using hormonal contraceptives before menopause on the risk of fracture in women SEARCH STRATEGY We searched for studies of fracture or bone health and hormonal contraceptives in MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and LILACS, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. We wrote to investigators to find additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered if they examined fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), or bone turnover in women with hormonal contraceptive use prior to menopause. Interventions could include comparing a hormonal contraceptive with a placebo or another hormonal contraceptive or could compare providing a supplement versus a placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We assessed all titles and abstracts identified through the literature searches. Mean differences were computed using the inverse variance approach. For dichotomous outcomes, the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR) was calculated. Both included the 95% confidence interval (CI) and used a fixed-effect model. Due to different interventions, no trials could be combined for meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS Of the 16 RCTs we found, 2 used a placebo and 1 used a non-hormonal method as the comparison, while 13 compared two hormonal contraceptives. No trial had fracture as an outcome. Most measured BMD and several assessed bone turnover. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) was associated with decreased bone mineral density. The placebo-controlled trials showed BMD increases for DMPA plus estrogen supplement and decreases for DMPA plus placebo. Combination contraceptives did not appear to negatively affect bone health, but none were placebo-controlled. For implants, the single-rod etonogestrel group showed a greater BMD decrease versus the two-rod levonorgestrel group. However, results were not consistent across all implant comparisons. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Whether steroidal contraceptives influence fracture risk cannot be determined from existing information. Many trials had small numbers of participants and some had large losses to follow up. Health care providers and women should consider the costs and benefits of these effective contraceptives. For example, injectable contraceptives and implants provide effective, long-term birth control yet do not involve a daily regimen. Progestin-only contraceptives are considered appropriate for women who should avoid estrogen due to medical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laureen M Lopez
- Clinical Sciences, FHI, P.O. Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA, 27709
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Freeman S, Shulman LP. Considerations for the use of progestin-only contraceptives. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 22:81-91. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00473.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
17
|
Hohmann H. Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the etonogestrel implantable contraceptive. Patient Prefer Adherence 2009; 3:205-11. [PMID: 19936163 PMCID: PMC2778430 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s4299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2009] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Contraceptive implants provide long-acting, highly effective reversible contraception. The etonogestrel implant (ENG implant) is a single rod implant that offers three years of efficacy. The ENG implant was designed to provide contraceptive efficacy by inhibiting ovulation and Pearl Index scores reported for this method are similar to other long-acting reversible contraception as well as similar to sterilization. The implant has been shown to be safe during breast feeding and may improve symptoms of dysmenorrhea and endometriosis. Irregular bleeding patterns can be expected with the device's use and should be addressed in order to decrease rates of discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Hohmann
- Correspondence: Heather Hohmann, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA, Tel +1 412 641 1441, Fax +1 412 641 1133, Email
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Steroidal contraceptive use has been associated with changes in bone mineral density in women. Whether such changes increase the risk of fractures later in life is not clear. However, osteoporosis is a major public health concern. Age-related decline in bone mass increases the risk of fracture, especially of the spine, hip, and wrist. Concern about bone health influences the recommendation and use of these effective contraceptives globally. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of using hormonal contraceptives before menopause on the risk of fracture in women SEARCH STRATEGY We searched for studies of fracture or bone health and hormonal contraceptives in MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and LILACS, as well as in clinical trials databases (ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP). We wrote to investigators to find additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials were considered if they examined fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), or bone turnover in women with hormonal contraceptive use prior to menopause. Studies were excluded if hormones were provided for treatment of a specific condition rather than for contraception. Interventions could include comparisons of a hormonal contraceptive with a placebo or with another hormonal contraceptive. Interventions could also include the provision of a supplement versus a placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We assessed for inclusion all titles and abstracts identified through the literature searches with no language limitation. The mean difference was computed with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a fixed-effect model. MAIN RESULTS We found 13 RCTs, 2 of which used a placebo. No trial had fracture as an outcome but most measured BMD. Combination contraceptives did not appear to affect bone health. Of progestin-only methods, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) was associated with decreased bone mineral density, while results were inconsistent for implants. The two placebo-controlled trials showed BMD increases for DMPA plus estrogen supplement and decreases for DMPA plus placebo. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Whether steroidal contraceptives influence fracture risk cannot be determined from existing information. Due to different interventions, no trials could be combined for meta-analysis. Many trials had small numbers of participants and some had large losses to follow up. Health care providers and women should consider the costs and benefits of these effective contraceptives. For example, injectable contraceptives and implants provide effective, long-term birth control yet do not involve a daily regimen. Progestin-only contraceptives are considered appropriate for women who should avoid estrogen due to medical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laureen M Lopez
- Behavioral and Biomedical Research, Family Health International, P.O. Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|