Virologic outcomes of second-line antiretroviral therapy in Eastern European country of Georgia

Virologic outcomes on dolutegravir-, atazanavir-, or efavirenz-based ART in urban Zimbabwe: A longitudinal study

There are few data from sub-Saharan Africa on the virological outcomes associated with second-line ART based on protease inhibitors or dolutegravir (DTG). We compared viral load (VL) suppression among people living with HIV (PLWH) on atazanavir (ATV/r)- or DTG-based second-line ART with PLWH on efavirenz (EFV)-based first-line ART. We analyzed data from the electronic medical records system of Newlands Clinic in Harare, Zimbabwe. We included individuals aged ≥12 years when commencing first-line EFV-based ART or switching to second-line DTG- or ATV/r-based ART with ≥24 weeks follow-up after start or switch. We computed suppression rates (HIV VL <50 copies/mL) at weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 and estimated the probability of VL suppression by treatment regimen, time since start/switch of ART, sex, age, and CD4 cell count (at start/switch) using logistic regression in a Bayesian framework. We included 7013 VL measurements of 1049 PLWH (61% female) initiating first-line ART and 1114 PLWH (58% female) switching to second-line ART. Among those switching, 872 (78.3%) were switched to ATV/r and 242 (21.7%) to DTG. VL suppression was lower in second-line ART than first-line ART, except at week 12, when those on DTG showed higher suppression than those on EFV (aOR 2.10, 95%-credible interval [CrI] 1.48-3.00) and ATV/r-based regimens (aOR 1.87, 95%-CrI 1.32-2.71). For follow-up times exceeding 24 weeks however, first-line participants demonstrated significantly higher VL suppression than second-line, with no evidence for a difference between DTG and ATV/r. Notably, from week 48 onward, VL suppression seemed to stabilize across all regimen groups, with an estimated 89.1% (95% CrI 86.9-90.9%) VL suppression in EFV, 74.5% (95%-CrI 68.0-80.7%) in DTG, and 72.9% (95%-CrI 69.5-76.1%) in ATV/r at week 48, showing little change for longer follow-up times. Virologic monitoring and adherence support remain essential even in the DTG era to prevent second-line treatment failure in settings with limited treatment options.

Time to Viral Re-suppression and Its Predictors among Adults on Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in South Wollo Zone Public Hospitals: Stratified Cox Model

Background

Even though there are many patients on second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Ethiopia, there is a paucity of evidence on the rate of viral resuppression and its predictors. Therefore, this study aimed to determine a time to viral resuppression and identify predictors among adults on second-line ART in South Wollo public hospitals, northeast Ethiopia.

Methods

A retrospective-cohort study design was employed using patients enrolled in second-line ART from August 28, 2016 to April 10, 2021. Data were collected using a structured data-extraction checklist with a sample size of 364 second-line ART patients from February 16 to March 30, 2021. EpiData 4.6 was used for data entry and Stata 14.2 was used for analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimating time to viral resuppression. The Shönfield test was used to check the proportional-hazard assumption, and the "no interaction" stratified Cox assumption was checked using the likelihood-ratio test. A stratified Cox model was applied to identify predictors of viral resuppression.

Results

Median time to viral re-suppression in patients on a second-line regimen was 10 (IQR 7-12) months. BeingFemale (AHR 1.31, 95% CI 1.01-1.69), low viral load count at switch (AHR 1.98, 95% CI 1.26-3.11), normal-range BMI at switch (AHR 1.42, 95% CI 1.03-1.95), and lopinavir-based second-line regimen (AHR 1.72, 95% CI 1.15-2.57) were significant predictors of early time to viral resuppression after stratification by WHO stage and adherence level.

Conclusion

Median time to viral re-suppression after switching to second-line ART was 10 months. In the stratified Cox model, female sex, baseline viral copies, second-line regimen type, and BMI at switch were statistically significant predictors of time to viral resuppression. Different stakeholders working on the HIV program should maintain viral resuppression by addressing significant predictors, and ART clinicians should consider ritonavir-boosted lopinavir based second-line ART for newly switched patients.

An observational study in an urban Ugandan clinic comparing virological outcomes of patients switched from first-line antiretroviral regimens to second-line regimens containing ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organisation approved boosted atazanavir as a preferred second line protease inhibitor in 2010. This is as an alternative to the current boosted lopinavir. Atazanavir has a lower genetic barrier than lopinavir. We compared the virological outcomes of patients during the roll out of routine viral load monitoring, who had switched to boosted second- line regimens of either atazanavir or lopinavir.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study involving adult patients at the Infectious Diseases Institute Kampala, Uganda started on a standard WHO recommended second-line regimen containing either boosted atazanavir or boosted lopinavir between 1 Dec 2014 and 31 July 2015.. Mantel -Haenszel chi square was used to test for the statistical significance of the odds of being suppressed (VL < 400 copies/ml) when on boosted atazanavir compared to boosted lopinavir after stratifying by duration on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Multivariate logistic regression analysis used to determine if the type of boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) was associated with virological outcome.

RESULTS

Ninety (90) % on ATV/r and 83% on LPV/r had a VL less than 1000 copies/ml. The odds of being suppressed using the same viral load cut-off while on boosted atazanavir compared to boosted lopinavir was not statistically significant after stratifying for duration on ART (p = 0.09). In a multivariate analysis the type of bPI used was not a predictor of virological outcome (p = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients using the WHO recommended second-line of boosted atazanavir have comparable virological suppression to those on boosted lopinavir.

Epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug resistance in HIV patients with virologic failure of first-line therapy in the country of Georgia

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug resistance is a major threat to the sustained impact of antiretroviral therapy (ART). We studied the epidemiology of drug resistance in the country of Georgia. The study included all adult patients who experienced virologic failure on first line ART and received HIV drug resistance testing between 2005 and 2016. The Stanford HIV Sequence Database was used for interpretation of the resistance data. Patient-level data were extracted from the national AIDS health information system. Of the 447 patients included, 85.5% harbored the subtype A6 virus, 8.0% - subtype B, 2.9% - subtype G, and other subtypes were <1%. The most frequent first-line regimens were Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz (28.4%), Zidovudine/Lamivudine/Efavirenz (28.4%), and Abacavir/Lamivudine/Efavirenz (15.9%). A total of 85.0% of the patients with treatment failure developed at least one drug resistance mutation affecting their susceptibility to ART. The most frequent nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations were M184V (65.3%), K65R (19.7%) and L74V (17.0%). At least three thymidine analogue mutations were detected in 6.3% of the patients. From non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations, G190S was shown to be the most prevalent (49.4%), followed by K101E (27.10%) and K103N (24.4%). G190S and K101E were more common in subtype A as compared with non-A viruses (G190S: 54.9% vs 11.3%, P < 0.0001; K101E: 29.8% vs 11.3%, P = 0.005). On the other hand, K103N was more frequent in non-A subtypes (43.4%) compared with subtype A (22.2%), P = 0.0008. A majority of persons failing on ART had HIV drug resistance. Drug resistance patterns may vary by subtype. K65R mutation remains below 20%, but given the high use of Tenofovir in the country, continuing surveillance of drug resistance is needed.

SESOTHO trial ("Switch Either near Suppression Or THOusand") - switch to second-line versus WHO-guided standard of care for unsuppressed patients on first-line ART with viremia below 1000 copies/mL: protocol of a multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, randomized clinical trial in Lesotho, Southern Africa

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends viral load (VL) measurement as the preferred monitoring strategy for HIV-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings. The new WHO guidelines 2016 continue to define virologic failure as two consecutive VL ≥1000 copies/mL (at least 3 months apart) despite good adherence, triggering switch to second-line therapy. However, the threshold of 1000 copies/mL for defining virologic failure is based on low-quality evidence. Observational studies have shown that individuals with low-level viremia (measurable but below 1000 copies/mL) are at increased risk for accumulation of resistance mutations and subsequent virologic failure. The SESOTHO trial assesses a lower threshold for switch to second-line ART in patients with sustained unsuppressed VL.

METHODS

In this multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted in Lesotho, patients on first-line ART with two consecutive unsuppressed VL measurements ≥100 copies/mL, where the second VL is between 100 and 999 copies/mL, will either be switched to second-line ART immediately (intervention group) or not be switched (standard of care, according to WHO guidelines). The primary endpoint is viral resuppression (VL < 50 copies/mL) 9 months after randomization. We will enrol 80 patients, giving us 90% power to detect a difference of 35% in viral resuppression between the groups (assuming two-sided 5% alpha error). For our primary analysis, we will use a modified intention-to-treat set, with those lost to care, death, or crossed over considered failure to resuppress, and using logistic regression models adjusted for the prespecified stratification variables.

DISCUSSION

The SESOTHO trial challenges the current WHO guidelines, assessing an alternative, lower VL threshold for patients with unsuppressed VL on first-line ART. This trial will provide data to inform future WHO guidelines on VL thresholds to recommend switch to second-line ART.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03088241 ), registered May 05, 2017.

Can Short-Term Use of Electronic Patient Adherence Monitoring Devices Improve Adherence in Patients Failing Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy? Evidence from a Pilot Study in Johannesburg, South Africa

High levels of adherence are required to achieve the full benefit of ART. We assess the effectiveness of electronic adherence monitoring devices among patients failing second-line ART, as measured by viral load suppression. Cohort study of Wisepill™ real-time adherence monitoring in addition to intensified adherence counselling over 3 months in adults with a viral load ≥400 copies/ml on second-line ART in Johannesburg, South Africa between August 2013 and January 2014. Patients were sent SMS reminders upon missing a scheduled dose. We compared outcomes to earlier historical cohorts receiving either intensified adherence counselling or adherence counselling alone. Overall, 63 % of the participants (31/49) took >80 % of their prescribed medication; this dropped from 76 to 53 and 49 % at 1, 2 and 3 months post-enrolment respectively. Compared to those with good adherence (>80 %), participants with poor adherence (≤80 %) had a higher risk for a subsequently elevated viral load ≥400 copies/ml (relative risk (RR) 1.47 95 % CI 0.97–2.23). Participants found the intervention “acceptable and useful” but by 6 months after eligibility they were only slightly more likely to be alive, in care and virally suppressed compared to those who received intensified adherence counselling (44.9 vs. 38.5 %; RR 1.19; 95 % CI 0.85–1.67) or adherence counselling alone (44.9 vs. 40.9 %; RR 1.12; 95 % CI 0.81–1.56). In patients with an elevated viral load on second-line ART electronic adherence monitoring was associated with a modest, but not significant, improvement in viral suppression.

[Factors associated with non-adherence of adults infected with HIV on antiretroviral therapy in a referral hospital in Douala]

Introduction

Le succès du traitement antirétroviral repose sur l'observance. Elle est nécessaire pour réduire la mortalité, diminuer le risque de résistance et restaurer l'immunité. Cette étude a pour but d'identifier et analyser les différents facteurs associés à la non observance thérapeutique des patients infectés par le VIH sous traitement antirétroviraux à l'hôpital de référence Laquintinie de Douala.

Méthodes

Il s'agit d'une étude transversale et analytique effectuée de mars à juin 2014. La non observance est mesurée à travers les déclarations du patient et sur consultation des registres de renouvellement des ordonnances. Etaient non observant, ceux ayant consommé moins de 95% de médicaments et ceux ne s’étant pas présentés pour le renouvellement de l'ordonnance. L'analyse bivariée et le modèle de régression logistique ont été utilisés pour la détermination des facteurs associés à la non observance.

Résultats

Au total, 524 patients ont été enrôlés dans l’étude;l’âge moyen était de 43,0 ± 10,7 ans et le sexe ratio H/F de 0,54. De ces patients, 49,0% étaient non observant, majoritairement des femmes (61,9%). Les principales raisons avancées de la non observance sont: l'oubli (32,9%), la rupture de médicaments (14,0%), les occupations (12,8%). Les personnes veuves(IC 95% OR= 1,31-5,22, p= 0,006), la consommation des excitants (IC 95%, OR= 2,30-6,90, p= 0,0001) et la présence d'infection opportuniste (IC 95%, OR= 1,41-17,54, p= 0,01) ont fortement été associés à la non observance.

Conclusion

Le taux d'observance était faible, lié à plusieurs facteurs. Des mesures sont nécessaires pour résoudre ce problème, y compris des stratégies tendant à l'amélioration du soutien psycho-social, et la limitation des ruptures de stock de médicaments. La recherche qualitative est souhaitée pour comprendre les raisons de la non observance afin de mettre au point des interventions fondées sur des données probantes.