1
|
Impact of Dextran-Sodium-Sulfate-Induced Enteritis on Murine Cytomegalovirus Reactivation. Viruses 2022; 14:v14122595. [PMID: 36560599 PMCID: PMC9781000 DOI: 10.3390/v14122595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease that causes inflammation of the intestines, which participates in human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) reactivation from its latent reservoir. CMV-associated colitis plays a pejorative role in the clinical course of UC. We took advantage of a model of chemically induced enteritis to study the viral reactivation of murine CMV (MCMV) in the context of gut inflammation. (2) Methods: Seven-week-old BALB/c mice were infected by 3 × 103 plaque-forming units (PFU) of MCMV; 2.5% (w/v) DSS was administered in the drinking water from day (D) 30 to D37 post-infection to induce enteritis. (3) Results: MCMV DNA levels in the circulation decreased from D21 after infection until resolution of the acute infection. DSS administration resulted in weight loss, high disease activity index, elevated Nancy index shortening of the colon length and increase in fecal lipocalin. However, chemically induced enteritis had no impact on MCMV reactivation as determined by qPCR and immunohistochemistry of intestinal tissues. (4) Conclusions: Despite the persistence of MCMV in the digestive tissues after the acute phase of infection, the gut inflammation induced by DSS did not induce MCMV reactivation in intestinal tissues, thus failing to recapitulate inflammation-driven HCMV reactivation in human UC.
Collapse
|
2
|
Deletions of the Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2/3 genes are common in field isolates from north-eastern Tanzania. Sci Rep 2022; 12:5802. [PMID: 35388127 PMCID: PMC8987040 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09878-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Plasmodium falciparum parasites lacking histidine-rich protein 2 and 3 (pfhrp2/3) genes have been reported in several parts of the world. These deletions are known to compromise the effectiveness of HRP2-based malaria rapid diagnostic tests (HRP2-RDT). The National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) in Tanzania adopted HRP2-RDTs as a routine tool for malaria diagnosis in 2009 replacing microscopy in many Health facilities. We investigated pfhrp2/3 deletions in 122 samples from two areas with diverse malaria transmission intensities in Northeastern Tanzania. Pfhrp2 deletion was confirmed in 1.6% of samples while pfhrp3 deletion was confirmed in 50% of samples. We did not find parasites with both pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions among our samples. Results from this study highlight the need for systematic surveillance of pfhrp2/3 deletions in Tanzania to understand their prevalence and determine their impact on the performance of mRDT.
Collapse
|
3
|
Baron A, Gicquel A, Plantier JC, Gueudin M. Evaluation of four commercial extraction-quantification systems to monitor EBV or CMV viral load in whole blood. J Clin Virol 2019; 113:39-44. [PMID: 30870646 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Revised: 12/24/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measurement of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral loads is commonly used to monitor posttransplant patients. Two new systems (eMAG/eSTREAM and Versant/kPCR) have been recently commercialized. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the performance of four systems to quantify CMV and EBV in whole blood. STUDY DESIGN Three extraction and real-time PCR amplification systems: m2000SP/RT (M2000), eMAG/eSTREAM (EMAG), and Versant/kPCR (KPCR) were compared with our routine system Qiasymphony/RGQ (QS/RGQ). The 4 systems were tested using 3 dilutions in triplicate according to the WHO international standard (WHO-IS) for intra-assay reproducibility; 56 whole blood samples (24 patients, 4 follow-ups) for CMV and 45 samples (27 patients, 3 follow-ups) for EBV. RESULTS For CMV, the mean of the WHO-IS (expected value: 4.7 Log IU/ml) was: QS/RGQ=4.84, M2000=4.61, EMAG=4.33, and KPCR=4.79. One patient (10 samples) presented a major underquantification by QS/RGQ. Of the 46 remaining samples, 41 were quantified with QS/RGQ, 43 with M2000, 33 with EMAG and 24 with KPCR. For EBV, the mean of the WHO-IS was: QS/RGQ=4.70, M2000=4.61, EMAG=4.62, and KPCR=4.57. Among the 45 samples, 43 were quantified with QS/RGQ, 39 with M2000, 40 with EMAG and 32 with KPCR. CONCLUSION The results obtained with the WHO-IS were very good. The results of patients' samples were well correlated with the announced sensitivity of each system. The elevated threshold of the KPCR CMV assay may be problematic for the follow-up of highly immunocompromised patients who require early introduction of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeline Baron
- CHU de Rouen, Laboratoire de Virologie, F-76000 Rouen, France
| | - Albane Gicquel
- CHU de Rouen, Laboratoire de Virologie, F-76000 Rouen, France
| | | | - Marie Gueudin
- CHU de Rouen, Laboratoire de Virologie, F-76000 Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Piñana JL, Giménez E, Gómez MD, Pérez A, González EM, Vinuesa V, Hernández-Boluda JC, Montoro J, Salavert M, Tormo M, Amat P, Moles P, Carretero C, Balaguer-Roselló A, Sanz J, Sanz G, Solano C, Navarro D. Pulmonary cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA shedding in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Implications for the diagnosis of CMV pneumonia. J Infect 2019; 78:393-401. [PMID: 30797790 PMCID: PMC7126576 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To date no definitive cut-off value for cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA load in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid specimens has been established to discriminate between CMV pneumonia and pulmonary CMV DNA shedding in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients. METHODS The current retrospective study is aimed at assessing the range of CMV DNA loads quantified in BAL fluid specimens from allo-HSCT patients with pneumonia in which different microorganisms were causally involved. RESULTS A total of 144 BAL specimens from 123 patients were included. CMV DNA was detected in 56 out of 144 BAL fluid specimens and the median CMV DNA load from patients in whom CMV pneumonia was unlikely or could be tentatively ruled out was 1210 (31-68, 920) IU/ml. The frequency of CMV DNA detection and median CMV DNA loads were comparable, irrespective of the attributable cause of pneumonia. Detection of CMV DNA loads in BAL fluid specimens >500 IU/ml was independently associated with pneumonia-attributable mortality. CONCLUSIONS The current study highlights the difficulty in establishing universal CMV DNA load thresholds in BAL fluid specimens for distinguishing between CMV pneumonia and pulmonary CMV DNA shedding, and suggests that the presence of CMV DNA in BAL fluid specimens beyond a certain level may have a deleterious impact on patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Luis Piñana
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Estela Giménez
- Microbiology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | - María Dolores Gómez
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ariadna Pérez
- Hematology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | - Eva María González
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Víctor Vinuesa
- Microbiology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Juan Montoro
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Miguel Salavert
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mar Tormo
- Hematology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | - Paula Amat
- Hematology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | - Paula Moles
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carlos Carretero
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Jaime Sanz
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Guillermo Sanz
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carlos Solano
- Hematology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - David Navarro
- Microbiology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain; Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Piñana JL, Gómez MD, Pérez A, Madrid S, Balaguer-Roselló A, Giménez E, Montoro J, González EM, Vinuesa V, Moles P, Hernández-Boluda JC, Salavert M, Calabuig M, Sanz G, Solano C, Sanz J, Navarro D. Community-acquired respiratory virus lower respiratory tract disease in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipient: Risk factors and mortality from pulmonary virus-bacterial mixed infections. Transpl Infect Dis 2018; 20:e12926. [PMID: 29809298 PMCID: PMC7169706 DOI: 10.1111/tid.12926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Revised: 05/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Risk factors (RFs) and mortality data of community‐acquired respiratory virus (CARVs) lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) with concurrent pulmonary co‐infections in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) is scarce. From January 2011 to December 2017, we retrospectively compared the outcome of allo‐HSCT recipients diagnosed of CARVs LRTD mono‐infection (n = 52, group 1), to those with viral, bacterial, or fungal pulmonary CARVs LRTD co‐infections (n = 15, group 2; n = 20, group 3, and n = 11, group 4, respectively), and with those having bacterial pneumonia mono‐infection (n = 19, group 5). Overall survival (OS) at day 60 after bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was significantly higher in group 1, 2, and 4 compared to group 3 (77%, 67%, and 73% vs 35%, respectively, P = .012). Recipients of group 5 showed a trend to better OS compared to those of group 3 (62% vs 35%, P = .1). Multivariate analyses showed bacterial co‐infection as a RF for mortality (hazard ratio[HR] 2.65, 95% C.I. 1.2‐6.9, P = .017). We identified other 3 RFs for mortality: lymphocyte count <0.5 × 109/L (HR 2.6, 95% 1.1‐6.2, P = .026), the occurrence of and CMV DNAemia requiring antiviral therapy (CMV‐DNAemia‐RAT) at the time of BAL (HR 2.32, 95% C.I. 1.1‐4.9, P = .03), and the need of oxygen support (HR 8.3, 95% C.I. 2.9‐35.3, P = .004). CARV LRTD co‐infections are frequent and may have a negative effect in the outcome, in particular in the context of bacterial co‐infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Luis Piñana
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,Instituto Carlos III, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Dolores Gómez
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ariadna Pérez
- Hematology Department, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - Silvia Madrid
- Microbiology Department, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Estela Giménez
- Microbiology Department, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juan Montoro
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,Instituto Carlos III, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eva María González
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Víctor Vinuesa
- Microbiology Department, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - Paula Moles
- Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Miguel Salavert
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marisa Calabuig
- Hematology Department, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - Guillermo Sanz
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,Instituto Carlos III, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Solano
- Hematology Department, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaime Sanz
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.,Instituto Carlos III, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Navarro
- Microbiology Department, Institute for Research INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.,Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Engelmann I, Alidjinou EK, Lazrek M, Ogiez J, Pouillaude JM, Chazard E, Dewilde A, Hober D. Comparison of two commercial quantitative PCR assays and correlation with the first WHO International Standard for human CMV. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2018; 91:27-33. [PMID: 29463426 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Revised: 12/26/2017] [Accepted: 12/28/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Comparability between CMV assays could be facilitated by the first WHO International Standard for human CMV (standard). Standard dilutions were submitted to nucleic acid extraction with Versant kPCR Molecular systems SP or MagNA Pure LC System followed by the kPCR PLX™ CMV DNA (kPCR) or the CMV R-gene™ assay (R-gene), respectively; 139 clinical specimens were tested. Both assays correlated well with the standard (R2 > 0.96) and a matrix effect was observed. Quantitative results correlated reasonably between both assays for whole blood (R2 = 0.79) and well for other specimen types (R2 = 0.93). Quantification differences were within one log10 of the averaged log10 results for 25/27 blood specimens and for 32/33 other specimens. Calibration to the standard did not increase this percentage. In conclusion, results of both assays showed reasonable correlation with each other and good correlation with the standard. Calibration to the standard did not improve comparability of quantitative results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilka Engelmann
- Univ Lille, Faculté de Médecine, CHU Lille, Laboratoire de Virologie EA3610, F-59000 Lille, France.
| | - Enagnon Kazali Alidjinou
- Univ Lille, Faculté de Médecine, CHU Lille, Laboratoire de Virologie EA3610, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Mouna Lazrek
- Univ Lille, Faculté de Médecine, CHU Lille, Laboratoire de Virologie EA3610, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Judith Ogiez
- Univ Lille, Faculté de Médecine, CHU Lille, Laboratoire de Virologie EA3610, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Jean-Marie Pouillaude
- Univ Lille, Faculté de Médecine, CHU Lille, Laboratoire de Virologie EA3610, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Emmanuel Chazard
- Univ. Lille, EA 2694, CHU Lille, Public health Department, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Anny Dewilde
- Univ Lille, Faculté de Médecine, CHU Lille, Laboratoire de Virologie EA3610, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Didier Hober
- Univ Lille, Faculté de Médecine, CHU Lille, Laboratoire de Virologie EA3610, F-59000 Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim H, Hur M, Kim JY, Moon HW, Yun YM, Cho HC. Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Systems for Detecting Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Using Real-Time PCR: A Comparison Study Between the QIAsymphony RGQ and QIAcube Systems. Ann Lab Med 2017; 37:129-136. [PMID: 28028999 PMCID: PMC5203990 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2017.37.2.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2016] [Revised: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are increasingly important in immunocompromised patients. Nucleic acid extraction methods could affect the results of viral nucleic acid amplification tests. We compared two automated nucleic acid extraction systems for detecting CMV and EBV using real-time PCR assays. METHODS One hundred and fifty-three whole blood (WB) samples were tested for CMV detection, and 117 WB samples were tested for EBV detection. Viral nucleic acid was extracted in parallel by using QIAsymphony RGQ and QIAcube (Qiagen GmbH, Germany), and real-time PCR assays for CMV and EBV were performed with a Rotor-Gene Q real-time PCR cycler (Qiagen). Detection rates for CMV and EBV were compared, and agreements between the two systems were analyzed. RESULTS The detection rate of CMV and EBV differed significantly between the QIAsymphony RGQ and QIAcube systems (CMV, 59.5% [91/153] vs 43.8% [67/153], P=0.0005; EBV, 59.0% [69/117] vs 42.7% [50/117], P=0.0008). The two systems showed moderate agreement for CMV and EBV detection (kappa=0.43 and 0.52, respectively). QIAsymphony RGQ showed a negligible correlation with QIAcube for quantitative EBV detection. QIAcube exhibited EBV PCR inhibition in 23.9% (28/117) of samples. CONCLUSIONS Automated nucleic acid extraction systems have different performances and significantly affect the detection of viral pathogens. The QIAsymphony RGQ system appears to be superior to the QIAcube system for detecting CMV and EBV. A suitable sample preparation system should be considered for optimized nucleic acid amplification in clinical laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanah Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mina Hur
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Ji Young Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Won Moon
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeo Min Yun
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Chan Cho
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Garcia M, Chessa C, Bourgoin A, Giraudeau G, Plouzeau C, Agius G, Lévêque N, Beby-Defaux A. Comparison of eMAG™ versus NucliSENS ® EasyMAG ® performance on clinical specimens. J Clin Virol 2017; 88:52-57. [PMID: 28160729 PMCID: PMC7185493 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Revised: 12/27/2016] [Accepted: 01/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
eMAG™ is a new nucleic acid extraction platform based on magnetic silica technology. Performance of eMAG™ and easyMAG® were compared on various clinical specimens. Agreement for virus detection ranged from 84.6% to 95.9%. Correlation for virus quantitation displayed R2 from 0.802 to 0.995. The two platforms showed comparable performance on the clinical specimens tested.
Background eMAG™ (bioMerieux) is a new nucleic acid extraction platform based on magnetic silica technology, like its predecessor, NucliSENS® easyMAG® (bioMerieux). Using the same reagents and disposables, eMAG™ adds further automation, allowing simultaneous extraction of 48 samples directly from primary tubes, and distribution of nucleic acid extracts on PCR strips or in tubes at the end of the extraction process. Objective To compare the performance of eMAG™ and easyMAG® on various clinical specimens. Study design Respiratory (n = 199), whole blood (n = 50), plasma (n = 25) and urine (n = 25) specimens were extracted in parallel on both platforms. Both qualitative (respiratory virus, cell control, CMV, EBV, HHV6 and BKV detection) and quantitative (respiratory virus and cell control cycle thresolds, and CMV, EBV, HHV6 and BKV viral loads) results were compared. Results Detection of qualitative targets showed good agreement, ranging from 84.6% for whole blood to 95.9% for respiratory specimens. Correlations between quantitative results were good, with R2 ranging from 0.802 to 0.995. Quantitative results showed average overall differences below 0.10 log10 copies/mL between eMAG™ and easyMAG®. Conclusions The two platforms showed comparable performance on the types of clinical specimen tested. With higher automation and throughput than easyMAG®, the eMAG™ platform is likely to be advantageous for laboratories performing a large number of molecular analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magali Garcia
- Laboratoire de Virologie et de Mycobactériologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; EA4331-LITEC, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Céline Chessa
- Laboratoire de Virologie et de Mycobactériologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; EA4331-LITEC, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Anne Bourgoin
- Laboratoire de Virologie et de Mycobactériologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Geneviève Giraudeau
- Laboratoire de Virologie et de Mycobactériologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Chloé Plouzeau
- Laboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Unité de Microbiologie Moléculaire et Séquençage, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Gérard Agius
- Laboratoire de Virologie et de Mycobactériologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Nicolas Lévêque
- Laboratoire de Virologie et de Mycobactériologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; EA4331-LITEC, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
| | - Agnès Beby-Defaux
- Laboratoire de Virologie et de Mycobactériologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Unité de Microbiologie Moléculaire et Séquençage, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chang J, Hwang SH, Kim MN, Sung H. Practical Aspects of Cytomegalovirus DNA Quantitative PCR. ANNALS OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY 2017. [DOI: 10.5145/acm.2017.20.2.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jeonghyun Chang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang-Hyun Hwang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Diagnostic Oncology, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Mi-Na Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Heungsup Sung
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mengelle C, Sandres-Sauné K, Mansuy JM, Haslé C, Boineau J, Izopet J. Performance of a completely automated system for monitoring CMV DNA in plasma. J Clin Virol 2016; 79:25-31. [PMID: 27060652 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Revised: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 03/25/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Completely automated systems for monitoring CMV-DNA in plasma samples are now available. OBJECTIVES Evaluate analytical and clinical performances of the VERIS™/MDx System CMV Assay(®). STUDY DESIGN Analytical performance was assessed using quantified quality controls. Clinical performance was assessed by comparison with the COBAS(®) Ampliprep™/COBAS(®) Taqman CMV test using 169 plasma samples that had tested positive with the in-house technique in whole blood. RESULTS The specificity of the VERIS™/MDx System CMV Assay(®) was 99% [CI 95%: 97.7-100]. Intra-assay reproducibilities were 0.03, 0.04, 0.05 and 0.04 log10IU/ml (means 2.78, 3.70, 4.64 and 5.60 log10IU/ml) for expected values of 2.70, 3.70, 4.70 and 5.70 log10IU/ml. The inter-assay reproducibilities were 0.12 and 0.08 (means 6.30 and 2.85 log10IU/ml) for expected values of 6.28 and 2.80 log10IU/ml. The lower limit of detection was 14.6IU/ml, and the assay was linear from 2.34 to 5.58 log10IU/ml. The results for the positive samples were concordant (r=0.71, p<0.0001; slope of Deming regression 0.79 [CI 95%: 0.56-1.57] and y-intercept 0.79 [CI 95%: 0.63-0.95]). The VERIS™/MDx System CMV Assay(®) detected 18 more positive samples than did the COBAS(®) Ampliprep™/COBAS(®) Taqman CMV test and the mean virus load were higher (0.41 log10IU/ml). Patient monitoring on 68 samples collected from 17 immunosuppressed patients showed similar trends between the two assays. As secondary question, virus loads detected by the VERIS™/MDx System CMV Assay(®) were compared to those of the in-house procedure on whole blood. The results were similar between the two assays (-0.09 log10IU/ml) as were the patient monitoring trends. CONCLUSION The performances of the VERIS™/MDx System CMV Assay(®) facilitated its routine use in monitoring CMV-DNA loads in plasma samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Mengelle
- Department of Virology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
| | - K Sandres-Sauné
- Department of Virology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France; Department of Physiopathology, Toulouse Purpan, Unité Inserm U563, Toulouse, France
| | - J-M Mansuy
- Department of Virology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - C Haslé
- Department of Virology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - J Boineau
- Department of Virology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - J Izopet
- Department of Virology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France; Department of Physiopathology, Toulouse Purpan, Unité Inserm U563, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kobayashi T, Gamboa D, Ndiaye D, Cui L, Sutton PL, Vinetz JM. Malaria Diagnosis Across the International Centers of Excellence for Malaria Research: Platforms, Performance, and Standardization. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2015; 93:99-109. [PMID: 26259937 PMCID: PMC4574279 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2015] [Accepted: 06/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Diagnosis is “the act of identifying a disease, illness, or problem by examining someone or something.” When an individual with acute fever presents for clinical attention, accurate diagnosis leading to specific, prompt treatment often saves lives. As applied to malaria, not only individual patient diagnosis is important but also assessing population-level malaria prevalence using appropriate diagnostic methods is essential for public health purposes. Similarly, identifying (diagnosing) fake antimalarial medications prevents the use of counterfeit drugs that can have disastrous effects. Therefore, accurate diagnosis in broad areas related to malaria is fundamental to improving health-care delivery, informing funding agencies of current malaria situations, and aiding in the prioritization of regional and national control efforts. The International Centers of Excellence for Malaria Research (ICEMR), supported by the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has collaborated on global efforts to improve malaria diagnostics by working to harmonize and systematize procedures across different regions where endemicity and financial resources vary. In this article, the different diagnostic methods used across each ICEMR are reviewed and challenges are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamaki Kobayashi
- *Address correspondence to Tamaki Kobayashi, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, W4612, Baltimore, MD 21205, E-mail: or Joseph M. Vinetz, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0760, E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | - Joseph M. Vinetz
- *Address correspondence to Tamaki Kobayashi, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, W4612, Baltimore, MD 21205, E-mail: or Joseph M. Vinetz, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0760, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bacterial and fungal DNA extraction from positive blood culture bottles: a manual and an automated protocol. Methods Mol Biol 2015; 1237:57-64. [PMID: 25319779 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1776-1_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
When adapting a gene amplification-based method in a routine sepsis diagnostics using a blood culture sample as a specimen type, a prerequisite for a successful and sensitive downstream analysis is the efficient DNA extraction step. In recent years, a number of in-house and commercial DNA extraction solutions have become available. Careful evaluation in respect to cell wall disruption of various microbes and subsequent recovery of microbial DNA without putative gene amplification inhibitors should be conducted prior selecting the most feasible DNA extraction solution for the downstream analysis used. Since gene amplification technologies have been developed to be highly sensitive for a broad range of microbial species, it is also important to confirm that the used sample preparation reagents and materials are bioburden-free to avoid any risks for false-positive result reporting or interference of the diagnostic process. Here, one manual and one automated DNA extraction system feasible for blood culture samples are described.
Collapse
|
13
|
The increased sensitivity of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) PCR quantitation in whole blood affects reproductive rate (Ro) measurement. J Virol Methods 2014; 196:179-84. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.10.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2013] [Revised: 10/29/2013] [Accepted: 10/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
14
|
Validation of the QIAsymphony RGQ system for DNA quantitation of different BK virus genotypes in whole blood samples. J Virol Methods 2014; 196:32-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2013] [Revised: 10/16/2013] [Accepted: 10/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
15
|
Pillet S, Roblin X, Cornillon J, Mariat C, Pozzetto B. Quantification of cytomegalovirus viral load. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2013; 12:193-210. [PMID: 24341395 DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2014.870887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV), a member of the Herpesviridae family, is worldwide distributed. After the primary infection, CMV induces a latent infection with possible reactivation(s). It is responsible for severe to life-threatening diseases in immunocompromised patients and in foetuses and newborns of infected mothers. For monitoring CMV load, classical techniques based on rapid culture or pp65 antigenemia are progressively replaced by quantitative nuclear acid tests (QNAT), easier to implement and standardize. A large variety of QNAT are available from laboratory-developed assays to fully-automated commercial tests. The indications of CMV quantification include CMV infection during pregnancy and in newborns, and viral surveillance of grafted and non-grafted immunocompromised patients, patients with bowel inflammatory diseases and those hospitalised in intensive care unit. A close cooperation between virologists and clinicians is essential for optimizing the benefit of CMV DNA monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvie Pillet
- Faculty of Medicine of Saint-Etienne, University of Lyon, Groupe Immunité des Muqueuses et Agents Pathogènes (GIMAP)-EA3064, 42023 Saint-Etienne, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|