(-)-Pentazocine induces visceral chemical antinociception, but not thermal, mechanical, or somatic chemical antinociception, in μ-opioid receptor knockout mice

Inhibitory Effects of a Novel μ-Opioid Receptor Nonpeptide Antagonist, UD-030, on Morphine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference

Although opioids are widely used to treat moderate to severe pain, opioid addiction and the opioid overdose epidemic are becoming more serious. Although opioid receptor antagonists/partial agonists, such as naltrexone and buprenorphine, have relatively low selectivity for the μ-opioid receptor (MOP), they have been used for the management of opioid use disorder. The utility of highly selective MOP antagonists remains to be evaluated. Here, we biologically and pharmacologically evaluated a novel nonpeptide ligand, UD-030, as a selective MOP antagonist. UD-030 had more than 100-fold higher binding affinity for the human MOP (K_i = 3.1 nM) than for δ-opioid, κ-opioid, and nociceptin receptors (K_i = 1800, 460, and 1800 nM, respectively) in competitive binding assays. The [³⁵S]-GTPγS binding assay showed that UD-030 acts as a selective MOP full antagonist. The oral administration of UD-030 dose-dependently suppressed the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced conditioned place preference in C57BL/6J mice, and its effects were comparable to naltrexone. These results indicate the UD-030 may be a new candidate for the treatment of opioid use disorder, with characteristics that differ from traditional medications that are in clinical use.

A systematic review on the kappa opioid receptor and its ligands: New directions for the treatment of pain, anxiety, depression, and drug abuse

Kappa opioid receptor (KOR) is a member of the opioid receptor system, the G protein-coupled receptors that are expressed throughout the peripheral and central nervous systems and play crucial roles in the modulation of antinociception and a variety of behavioral states like anxiety, depression, and drug abuse. KOR agonists are known to produce potent analgesic effects and have been used clinically for the treatment of pain, while KOR antagonists have shown efficacy in the treatment of anxiety and depression. This review summarizes the history, design strategy, discovery, and development of KOR ligands. KOR agonists are classified as non-biased, G protein-biased, and β-arrestin recruitment-biased, according to their degrees of bias. The mechanisms and associated effects of the G protein signaling pathway and β-arrestin recruitment signaling pathway are also discussed. Meanwhile, KOR antagonists are classified as long-acting and short-acting, based on their half-lives. In addition, we have special sections for mixed KOR agonists and selective peripheral KOR agonists. The mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and behavioral studies for each of these categories are also discussed in this review.

Comparative study of dezocine, pentazocine and tapentadol on antinociception and physical dependence

AIMS

Dezocine and pentazocine, widely prescribed in China for postoperative pain, were initially considered as mixed agonist/antagonist targeting μ-opioid receptors (MORs) and κ-opioid receptors (KORs). However, dezocine has been revealed to alleviate chronic neuropathic pain through MOR activation and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition (NRI). This study investigated dezocine- and pentazocine-induced antinociception and physical dependence development, compared to the typical MOR-NRI opioid tapentadol.

MAIN METHODS

Calcium mobilization assay was conducted to assess the potency of the drugs while hot-plate test was performed to compare the antinociception. Physical dependence development was compared with morphine.

KEY FINDINGS

Treatment with dezocine, pentazocine and tapentadol stimulated calcium mobilization in HEK293 cells stably expressed MORs but not KORs, whereas dezocine and pentazocine inhibited KOR activities. Subcutaneously injected dezocine-, tapentadol- and pentazocine-induced antinociception dose-dependently, in hot-plate test. Intrathecally injected MOR antagonist CTAP, norepinephrine depletor 6-OHDA and α₂-adrenoceptor (α₂-AR) antagonist yohimbine partially antagonized dezocine, pentazocine and tapentadol antinociception. Whereas specific KOR antagonist GNTI did not alter their antinociception, the putative inverse KOR agonist nor-BNI reduced dezocine and pentazocine antinociception. Moreover, combined CTAP and 6-OHDA or yohimbine blocked dezocine and tapentadol antinociception but displayed the same partial inhibition on pentazocine antinociception as CTAP alone. Furthermore, compared to morphine and pentazocine, long-term treatment with dezocine and tapentadol produced much less physical dependence-related withdrawal signs, which were restored by spinal 6-OHDA or yohimbine treatment.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings illustrated that dezocine and tapentadol, but not pentazocine, exert remarkable antinociception in nociceptive pain with less abuse liability via dual mechanisms of MOR activation and NRI.

Synergistic interaction between haloperidol and gabapentin in a model of neuropathic nociception in rat

Preclinical studies have reported that sigma-1 receptor antagonists may have efficacy in neuropathic pain states. The sigma-1 receptor is a unique ligand-operated chaperone present in crucial areas for pain control, in both the peripheral and central nervous system. This study assesses the synergistic antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effect of haloperidol, a sigma-1 antagonist, combined with gabapentin in rats with peripheral neuropathy. Wistar rats male were subjected to chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve. The effects of systemic administration of gabapentin and the sigma-1 receptor antagonist, haloperidol, were examined at 11 days post-CCI surgery. An analysis of Surface of Synergistic Interaction was used to determine whether the combination's effects were synergistic. Twelve combinations showed various degrees of interaction in the antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects. In hyperalgesia, three combinations showed additive effects, four combinations showed supra-additive effects, and three combinations produced an effect limited by the maximum effect. In allodynia, five combinations showed additive effects, two combinations showed supra-additive effects, and five combinations produced antihyperalgesic effects limited by the maximum effect. These findings indicate that the administration of some specific combination of gabapentin and haloperidol can synergistically reduce nerve injury-induced allodynia and hyperalgesia. This suggests that the haloperidol-gabapentin combination can improve the antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects in a neuropathic pain model.

Negative modulation of spinal κ-opioid receptor-mediated antinociception by the µ-opioid receptor at selective doses of (-)-pentazocine

The mixed-action κ-opioid receptor (KOR) agonist, pentazocine, binds to both KOR and the µ-opioid receptor (MOR). Racemic (±)-pentazocine and (−)-pentazocine, each administered systemically, have been shown to produce antinociception in various animal models. In contrast, racemic (±)-pentazocine failed to produce antinociception when administered intrathecally (i.t.). However, whether spinal activation of KOR and MOR by (−)-pentazocine produces antinociception and the relative contribution of KOR and MOR in mediating antinociception remain unknown. Hence, we investigated whether i.t. (−)-pentazocine produces dose-dependent modulation of acute thermal nociception. Drugs were administered intrathecally in Sprague-Dawley rats and tail flick latency was recorded. Pentazocine produced a significant antinociceptive effect that was mediated by KOR and/or MOR at differential doses. MOR blockade restored the antinociceptive effect of an ineffective dose and prolonged the duration of an effective dose of pentazocine. Hence, spinal KOR and MOR mediated the effect of pentazocine. This study provides evidence that spinal MOR negatively modulates the KOR-mediated antinociceptive effect of i.t. pentazocine.

Estrogen facilitates and the kappa and mu opioid receptors mediate antinociception produced by intrathecal (-)-pentazocine in female rats

Pentazocine, a mixed-action kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonist, has high affinity for both KOR and the mu opioid receptor (MOR), and has been shown clinically to alleviate pain with a pronounced effect in women. However, whether local application of pentazocine in the spinal cord produces antinociception and the contribution of spinal KOR and MOR in mediating the effect of pentazocine in female rats remain unknown. Also, it is not known whether pentazocine-induced antinociception in females is estrogen-dependent. Hence, we investigated whether intrathecal (i.t.) (-)-pentazocine produces thermal antinociception and whether estrogen modulates the drug effect in female rats. Only the highest dose of pentazocine (500 nmol) was effective in producing antinociception in ovariectomized (OVX) rats. In contrast, pentazocine produced antinociception in estradiol-treated ovariectomized females (OVX+E) rats with the lowest effective dose being 250nmol. KOR or MOR mediated the effect of the lowest effective dose in OVX+E rats; however, MOR blockade extended the KOR-mediated effect of 500nmol pentazocine in both groups. In normally cycling females, the 250nmol dose was effective in producing antinociception at the proestrous, but not at the diestrous stage of the estrous cycle. Thus, estrogen facilitates and KOR or MOR mediates. the antinociceptive effect of i.t. (-)-pentazocine in female rats. Selective doses of (-)-pentazocine, with or without MOR blockade, may have a therapeutic benefit.

Involvement of the opioid and cannabinoid systems in pain control: new insights from knockout studies

The endogenous opioid and cannabinoid systems are involved in the physiological inhibitory control of pain and are of particular interest for the development of therapeutic approaches for pain management. The involvement of these endogenous systems in pain control has been studied from decades by the use of compounds with different affinities for each cannabinoid and opioid receptor or for the different enzymes involved in endocannabinoid and endogenous opioid metabolism. However, the selectivity of these pharmacological tools in vivo has represented an important limitation for these studies. The generation of genetically modified mice with selective mutations in specific components of the endocannabinoid and endogenous opioid system has provided important advances in the identification of the specific contribution of each component of these endogenous systems in the perception of noxious stimuli and the development of pathological pain states. Different lines of constitutive and conditional knockout mice deficient in specific cannabinoid and opioid receptors, specific precursors of the endogenous opioid peptides and the main enzymes involved in endocannabinoid and endogenous opioid degradation are now available. These knockout mice have also been used to evaluate the contribution of each component of the endocannabinoid and opioid system in the antinociceptive effects of cannabinoid and opioid agonists, including those currently used to treat pain in humans. This review summarizes the main advances provided in the last 15 years by the use of these genetic tools in the knowledge of the physiological control of pain and the pharmacology of cannabinoid and opioid compounds for pain management.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2011

This paper is the thirty-fourth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2011 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).

Ligand directed signaling differences between rodent and human κ-opioid receptors

KOR activation of Gβγ dependent signaling results in analgesia, whereas the dysphoric effects of KOR agonists are mediated by a different pathway involving G protein receptor kinase and non-visual arrestin. Based on this distinction, a partial KOR agonist that does not efficiently activate arrestin-dependent biased signaling may produce analgesia without dysphoria. No KOR-selective partial agonists are currently available, and preclinical assessment is complicated by sequence differences between rodent (r) and human (h) KOR. In this study, we compared the signaling initiated by the available partial agonists. Pentazocine was significantly more potent at activating p38 MAPK in hKOR than rKOR expressed in HEK293 cells but equally potent at arrestin-independent activation of ERK1/2 in hKOR and rKOR. Similarly, butorphanol increased phospho-p38-ir in hKOR-expressing cells but did not activate p38 in rKOR-HEK293. Like pentazocine, butorphanol was equally efficacious at activating ERK1/2 in rKOR and hKOR. In contrast, levorphanol, nalorphine, and U50,488 did not distinguish between hKOR and rKOR in p38 MAPK activation. Consistent with its low potency at p38 activation, pentazocine did not produce conditioned place aversion in mice. hKOR lacks the Ser-369 phosphorylation site in rKOR required for G protein receptor kinase/arrestin-dependent p38 activation, but mutation of the Ser-358 to asparagine in hKOR blocked p38 activation without affecting the acute arrestin-independent activation of ERK1/2. This study shows that hKOR activates p38 MAPK through a phosphorylation and arrestin-dependent mechanism; however, activation differs between hKOR and rKOR for some ligands. These functional selectivity differences have important implications for preclinical screening of partial KOR agonists.