No evidence for the development of acute analgesic tolerance during and hyperalgesia after prolonged remifentanil administration in mice

Thalamocortical circuits drive remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia

Remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (RIH) is a severe but common postoperative clinical problem with elusive underlying neural mechanisms. Here, we discovered that glutamatergic neurons in the thalamic ventral posterolateral nucleus (VPLGlu) exhibited significantly elevated burst firing accompanied by upregulation of Cav3.1 T-type calcium channel expression and function in RIH model mice. In addition, we identified a glutamatergic neuronal thalamocortical circuit in the VPL projecting to hindlimb primary somatosensory cortex glutamatergic neurons (S1HLGlu) that mediated RIH. In vivo calcium imaging and multi-tetrode recordings revealed heightened S1HLGlu neuronal activity during RIH. Moreover, preoperative suppression of Cav3.1-dependent burst firing in VPLGlu neurons or chemogenetic inhibition of VPLGlu neuronal terminals in the S1HL abolished the increased S1HLGlu neuronal excitability while alleviating RIH. Our findings suggest that remifentanil induces postoperative hyperalgesia by upregulating T-type calcium channel-dependent burst firing in VPLGlu neurons to activate S1HLGlu neurons, thus revealing an ion channel-mediated neural circuit basis for RIH that can guide analgesic development.

Determination of acute tolerance and hyperalgesia to remifentanil constant rate infusion in dogs undergoing sevoflurane anaesthesia

OBJECTIVE

To determine if acute opioid tolerance (AOT) or opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) could develop and limit the remifentanil-induced reduction in the sevoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). The response to mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) was evaluated and related to OIH.

STUDY DESIGN

A crossover, randomized, experimental animal study.

ANIMALS

A total of nine Beagle dogs.

METHODS

The dogs were anaesthetized with sevoflurane in 50% oxygen. Baseline sevoflurane MAC was measured (MACb1). Remifentanil (0.3 μg kg^-1 minute^-1) or 0.9% saline constant rate infusion (CRI) was administered intravenously (IV). Sevoflurane MAC was determined 20 minutes after CRI was initiated (MACpostdrug1), 30 minutes after MACpostdrug1 determination (MACpostdrug2) and after 1 week (MACb2). The MNT was determined at baseline (before anaesthesia), 3 and 7 days after anaesthesia. An increase of MACpostdrug2 ≥0.25% compared to MACpostdrug1 was considered evidence of AOT. A decrease in MNT at 3 and 7 days or an increase in MACb2 or both with respect to MACb1 were considered evidence of OIH.

RESULTS

Remifentanil CRI reduced sevoflurane MACpostdrug1 by 43.7% with respect to MACb1. MACpostdrug2 was no different from MACpostdrug1 with the saline (p = 0.62) or remifentanil (p = 0.78) treatments. No significant differences were observed in the saline (p = 0.99) or remifentanil (p = 0.99) treatments between MACb1 and MACb2, or for MNT values between baseline, 3 and 7 days.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In dogs, under the study conditions, remifentanil efficacy in reducing sevoflurane MAC did not diminish in the short term, suggesting remifentanil did not induce AOT. Hyperalgesia was not detected 3 or 7 days after the administration of remifentanil. Contrary to data from humans and rodents, development of AOT or OIH in dogs is not supported by the findings of this study.

TRPV1 channel contributes to remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia via regulation of NMDA receptor trafficking in dorsal root ganglion

Background

Remifentanil is widely used in general anesthesia due to its reliability and rapid onset. However, remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia might be a challenge nowadays. Accumulating evidence suggests that the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) was involved in the development of neuropathic pain and hyperalgesia. However, the contribution of TRPV1 in modulating remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia is still unknown. The aim of this study is the contribution of TRPV1 to the surface expression of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia.

Methods

The hot plate test and the Von Frey test were performed to evaluate thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia. Capsazepine (CPZ) was administrated intrathecally to confirm our results. TRPV1, NMDA receptors, CaMKII (calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II), and protein kinase C (PKC) in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) were detected by Western blotting. Immunofluorescence assay was applied to analyze the distribution of TRPV1 and the relationship between TRPV1 and NMDA receptor subunit 1 (NR1).

Results

Remifentanil-induced both thermal and mechanical postoperative hyperalgesia. Here, we found the membrane trafficking of NR1, possibly due to the activation of TRPV1 in DRG neurons after remifentanil infusion. Furthermore, intrathecal injection of CPZ was able to relieve remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia according to a behavioral test and CPZ confirmed that TRPV1 is involved in NR1 trafficking. In addition, CaMKII/PKC but not protein kinase A (PKA) contributed to remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that TRPV1 receptors are involved in remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia. TRPV1 contributes to the persistence of remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia through the trafficking of NMDA receptors via the activation of CaMKII-PKC signaling pathways in DRG neurons.

Enhancement of spinal dorsal horn neuron NMDA receptor phosphorylation as the mechanism of remifentanil induced hyperalgesia: Roles of PKC and CaMKII

Background

Modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits NR1 and NR2 through phosphorylation mediates opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and activations of protein kinase C and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 potentiate while activation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II inhibits opioid-induced hyperalgesia. However, the mechanism of opioid-induced hyperalgesia development and in particular the potential interplay between N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and protein kinase C or calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II or extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 in the development of remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia is unclear.

Methods

Remifentanil (1 µg ċ kg−1 ċ min−1) was given intravenously over 60 min in rats, followed by the infusion of either vehicle solution or the respective inhibitors of protein kinase C (chelerythrine), extracellular signal-regulated kinase II (KN93), or extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (PD98059). Thereafter, the pain behaviors were evaluated by the paw withdrawal mechanical threshold and paw withdrawal thermal latency. In in vitro studies, fetal spinal cord dorsal horn neurons were primary cultured in the presence of 4 nM remifentanil for 60 min, and then the remifentanil was washed out and replaced immediately by culturing in the absence or presence of chelerythrine, KN93 or PD98059, respectively for up to 8 h. The expressions of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors subunits and their phosphorylation (NR1, NR2B, p-NR1, p-NR2B) were analyzed by Western blotting after the completion of treatments. Functional changes of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors were evaluated by electrophysiologic recordings of N-methyl-D-aspartate currents.

Results

Remifentanil induced significant thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia, which were significantly attenuated by Chelerythrine or KN93 but not PD98059. The expressions of NR1, NR2B, p-NR1, and p-NR2B were increased significantly and progressively over time after remifentanil administration, and these increases were all significantly attenuated by either chelerythrine or KN93 but not PD98059. Intriguingly, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor functional enhancement induced by remifentanil was attenuated by Chelerythrine, KN93, and PD98059.

Conclusions

It is concluded that the enhancements in function and quantity of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor via phosphorylation of its subunits through protein kinase C and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II activation may represent the major mechanism whereby remifentanil induced hyperalgesia.

Withdrawal from spinal application of remifentanil induces long-term potentiation of c-fiber-evoked field potentials by activation of Src family kinases in spinal microglia

It is well known that remifentanil, a widely used intravenous anesthesia drug, can paradoxically induce hyperalgesia. The underlying mechanisms are still not clear despite the wide investigations. The present study demonstrated that withdrawal from spinal application of remifentanil could dose-dependently induce long term potentiation (LTP) of C-fiber evoked field potentials. Remifentanil withdrawal could activate Src family kinases (SFKs) in microglia, and upregulate the expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) in spinal dorsal horn. Furthermore, pretreatment with either microglia inhibitor Minocycline, SFKs inhibitor PP2 or TNF αneutralization antibody could block remifentanil withdrawal induced spinal LTP, whereas supplement of recombinant rat TNFα to the spinal cord could reverse the inhibitory effect of Minocycline or PP2 on remifentanil withdrawal induced LTP. Our results suggested that TNFαrelease following SFKs activation in microglia is involved in the induction of LTP induced by remifentanil withdrawal.

Remifentanil-acute opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia: a systematic review

The use of opioids may seem to be a double-edged sword; they provide straight analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects initially, but subsequently are associated with the expression of acute opioid tolerance (AOT) and opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) that have been reported in experimental studies and clinical observations. It has been suggested that opioids can induce an acute tolerance and hyperalgesia in dose- and/or time-dependent manners even when used within the clinically accepted doses. Recently, remifentanil has been used for pain management in clinical anesthesia and in the intensive care units because of its rapid onset and offset. We reviewed articles analyzing AOT and/or OIH by remifentanil and focused on the following issues: (1) evidence of remifentanil inducing AOT and/or OIH and (2) importance of AOT and/or OIH in considering the reduction of remifentanil dosage or adopting preventive modulations. Twenty-four experimental and clinical studies were identified using electronic searches of MEDLINE (PubMed, Ovid, Springer, and Elsevier). However, the development of AOT and OIH by remifentanil administration remains controversial. There is no sufficient evidence to support or refute the existence of OIH in humans.

Direct Effect of Remifentanil and Glycine Contained in Ultiva® on Nociceptive Transmission in the Spinal Cord: In Vivo and Slice Patch Clamp Analyses

Background

Ultiva® is commonly administered intravenously for analgesia during general anaesthesia and its main constituent remifentanil is an ultra-short-acting μ-opioid receptor agonist. Ultiva® is not approved for epidural or intrathecal use in clinical practice. Previous studies have reported that Ultiva® provokes opioid-induced hyperalgesia by interacting with spinal dorsal horn neurons. Ultiva® contains glycine, an inhibitory neurotransmitter but also an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor co-activator. The presence of glycine in the formulation of Ultiva® potentially complicates its effects. We examined how Ultiva® directly affects nociceptive transmission in the spinal cord.

Methods

We made patch-clamp recordings from substantia gelatinosa (SG) neurons in the adult rat spinal dorsal horn in vivo and in spinal cord slices. We perfused Ultiva® onto the SG neurons and analysed its effects on the membrane potentials and synaptic responses activated by noxious mechanical stimuli.

Results

Bath application of Ultiva® hyperpolarized membrane potentials under current-clamp conditions and produced an outward current under voltage-clamp conditions. A barrage of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) evoked by the stimuli was suppressed by Ultiva®. Miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs) were depressed in frequency but not amplitude. Ultiva®-induced outward currents and suppression of mEPSCs were not inhibited by the μ-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone, but were inhibited by the glycine receptor antagonist strychnine. The Ultiva®-induced currents demonstrated a specific equilibrium potential similar to glycine.

Conclusions

We found that intrathecal administration of Ultiva® to SG neurons hyperpolarized membrane potentials and depressed presynaptic glutamate release predominantly through the activation of glycine receptors. No Ultiva®-induced excitatory effects were observed in SG neurons. Our results suggest different analgesic mechanisms of Ultiva® between intrathecal and intravenous administrations.

Differential tolerance to morphine antinociception in assays of pain-stimulated vs. pain-depressed behavior in rats

In preclinical research on pain and analgesia, noxious stimuli can stimulate expression of some behaviors (e.g. withdrawal reflexes) and depress others (e.g. feeding, locomotion, and positively reinforced operant responding). Tolerance to morphine antinociception is a robust and reliable phenomenon in preclinical assays of pain-stimulated behavior, but development of morphine tolerance in assays of pain-depressed behavior has not been studied. This study compared morphine antinociceptive tolerance in parallel assays of pain-stimulated and pain-depressed behavior in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Intraperitoneal injection of dilute lactic acid served as a noxious stimulus to stimulate a stretching response in one group of rats and to depress operant responding for electrical brain stimulation (intracranial self-stimulation; ICSS) in another group of rats. Antinociception produced by morphine (1.0 mg/kg) was determined after a regimen of chronic treatment with either saline or morphine in separate subgroups of rats in each procedure. In rats receiving chronic saline, acid alone stimulated a stretching response and depressed ICSS, and both acid effects were blocked by 1.0 mg/kg morphine. Rats receiving chronic morphine displayed hyperalgesic responses to the acid noxious stimulus in both procedures. Complete tolerance developed to morphine antinociception in the assay of acid-stimulated stretching, but morphine retained full antinociceptive effectiveness in the assay of acid-depressed ICSS. These results suggest that morphine antinociception in an assay of pain-depressed behavior is relatively resistant to tolerance. More broadly, these results suggest that antinociceptive tolerance can develop at different rates or to different degrees for different measures of antinociception.

Intraoperative use of remifentanil and opioid induced hyperalgesia/acute opioid tolerance: systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The use of opioids has been increasing in operating room and intensive care unit to provide perioperative analgesia as well as stable hemodynamics. However, many authors have suggested that the use of opioids is associated with the expression of acute opioid tolerance (AOT) and opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) in experimental studies and clinical observations in dose and/or time dependent exposure even when used within the clinically accepted doses. Recently, remifentanil has been used for pain management during anesthesia as well as in the intensive care units because of its rapid onset and offset.

OBJECTIVES

Search of the available literature to assess remifentanil AOT and OIH based on available published data.

METHODS

We reviewed articles analyzing remifentanil AOT and OIH, and focused our literature search on evidence based information. Experimental and clinical studies were identified using electronic searches of Medline (PubMed, Ovid, Springer, and Elsevier, ClinicalKey).

RESULTS

Our results showed that the development of remifentanil AOT and OIH is a clinically significant phenomenon requiring further research.

DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

AOT - defined as an increase in the required opioid dose to maintain adequate analgesia, and OIH - defined as decreased pain threshold after chronic opioid treatment, should be suspected with any unexplained pain report unassociated with the disease progression. The clinical significance of these findings was evaluated taking into account multiple methodological issues including the dose and duration of opioids administration, the different infusion mode, the co-administrated anesthetic drug's effect, method assessing pain sensitivity, and the repetitive and potentially tissue damaging nature of the stimuli used to determine the threshold during opioid infusion. Future studies need to investigate the contribution of remifentanil induced hyperalgesia to chronic pain and the role of pharmacological modulation to reverse this process.