1
|
Ding K, Nguyen N, Carvalho M, Dissak Delon FN, Mekolo D, Nkusu D, Tchekep MS, Oke RA, Mbianyor MA, Yenshu EV, Boeck M, Collins C, Jackson N, Mefire AC, Juillard C. Baseline Patient Safety Culture in Cameroon: Setting a Foundation for Trauma Quality Improvement. J Surg Res 2020; 255:311-318. [PMID: 32593889 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trauma quality improvement (QI) has resulted in decreased trauma mortality and morbidity in high-income countries and has the potential to do the same in low- and middle-income countries. Effective implementation of QI programs relies on a foundational culture of patient safety; however, studies on trauma-related patient safety culture in Sub-Saharan Africa remain scarce. This study assesses baseline patient safety culture in Cameroon to best identify opportunities for improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS Over a 3-week period, the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was administered in three hospitals in the Littoral region of Cameroon. Percentages of positive responses (PPRs) were calculated across 42 items in 12 survey dimensions. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to summarize dimension-level percentages and confidence intervals. RESULTS A total of 179 trauma-related hospital personnel were surveyed with an overall response rate of 76.8%. High PPRs indicate favorable patient safety culture. Of the 12 dimensions evaluated by the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture, nine had a PPR below 50%. Dimensions particularly pertinent in the context of QI include Nonpunitive Response to Errors with a PPR of 25.8% and Organization Learning-Continuous Improvement with a PPR of 64.7%. CONCLUSIONS The present study elucidates an opportunity for the development of trauma patient safety culture in Cameroon. Low PPR for Nonpunitive Response to Errors indicates a need to shift cultural paradigms from ascribing individual blame to addressing systemic shortcomings of patient care. Moving forward, data from this study will inform interventions to cultivate patient safety culture in partnering Cameroonian hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Ding
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nicole Nguyen
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Melissa Carvalho
- Program for the Advancement of Surgical Equity, Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - David Mekolo
- Emergency Unit, Laquintinie Hospital of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
| | | | - Mirene S Tchekep
- Program for the Advancement of Surgical Equity, Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Rasheedat A Oke
- Program for the Advancement of Surgical Equity, Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mbiarikai A Mbianyor
- Program for the Advancement of Surgical Equity, Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Emmanuel V Yenshu
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
| | - Marissa Boeck
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Caitlin Collins
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Nicholas Jackson
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alain Chichom Mefire
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
| | - Catherine Juillard
- Program for the Advancement of Surgical Equity, Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Votruba N, Grant J, Thornicroft G. The EVITA framework for evidence-based mental health policy agenda setting in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan 2020; 35:424-439. [PMID: 32040175 PMCID: PMC7195852 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The burden of mental illness is excessive, but many countries lack evidence-based policies to improve practice. Mental health research evidence translation into policymaking is a 'wicked problem', often failing despite a robust evidence base. In a recent systematic review, we identified a gap in frameworks on agenda setting and actionability, and pragmatic, effective tools to guide action to link research and policy are needed. Responding to this gap, we developed the new EVITA 1.1 (EVIdence To Agenda setting) conceptual framework for mental health research-policy interrelationships in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We (1) drafted a provisional framework (EVITA 1.0); (2) validated it for specific applicability to mental health; (3) conducted expert in-depth interviews to (a) validate components and mechanisms and (b) assess intelligibility, functionality, relevance, applicability and effectiveness. To guide interview validation, we developed a simple evaluation framework. (4) Using deductive framework analysis, we coded and identified themes and finalized the framework (EVITA 1.1). Theoretical agenda-setting elements were added, as targeting the policy agenda-setting stage was found to lead to greater policy traction. The framework was validated through expert in-depth interviews (n = 13) and revised. EVITA 1.1 consists of six core components [advocacy coalitions, (en)actors, evidence generators, external influences, intermediaries and political context] and four mechanisms (capacity, catalysts, communication/relationship/partnership building and framing). EVITA 1.1 is novel and unique because it very specifically addresses the mental health research-policy process in LMICs and includes policy agenda setting as a novel, effective mechanism. Based on a thorough methodology, and through its specific design and mechanisms, EVITA has the potential to improve the challenging process of research evidence translation into policy and practice in LMICs and to increase the engagement and capacity of mental health researchers, policy agencies/planners, think tanks, NGOs and others within the mental health research-policy interface. Next, EVITA 1.1 will be empirically tested in a case study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Votruba
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Jonathan Grant
- Policy Institute at King’s, King’s College London, 1st Floor, Virginia Woolf Building, 22 Kingsway, London WC2B 6LE, UK
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ibrahim MAM, Osman OB, Ahmed WAM. Assessment of patient safety measures in governmental hospitals in Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia. AIMS Public Health 2020; 6:396-404. [PMID: 31909062 PMCID: PMC6940565 DOI: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.4.396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/objective There is a need for patient safety in healthcare settings, WHO recommended an intergradation of patient safety in the curriculum of health specialties. This study aimed to assess the application patient safety measures at governmental hospitals in Al-Baha region. Methods This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. It was conducted at Al-Baha governmental hospitals, 2017-2018. The data was collected using a pretested, modified and validated questionnaire, a convenience sampling technique was used among 115 health care providers (doctors and nurses). The collected data was analyzed using SPSS version 22. Results The study showed that most of participants have previous training on patient safety and about 81.7% of them had heard about global aims of patient safety. The level of application of patient safety at Al-Baha governmental hospitals was 106 (92.2%) as very often. The findings showed that there are no significant influencing factors on application of patient safety. Conclusion The application of patient safety in Al-Baha governmental hospitals was very high. There are no significant influencing factors for the application status of patient safety measures in Al-Baha governmental hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Osman Babiker Osman
- Public Health Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Albaha University, Saudi Arabia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ibe CA, Basu L, Gooden R, Syed SB, Dadwal V, Bone LR, Ephraim PL, Weston CM, Wu AW. From Kisiizi to Baltimore: cultivating knowledge brokers to support global innovation for community engagement in healthcare. Global Health 2018; 14:19. [PMID: 29426345 PMCID: PMC5807858 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-018-0339-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Reverse Innovation has been endorsed as a vehicle for promoting bidirectional learning and information flow between low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries, with the aim of tackling common unmet needs. One such need, which traverses international boundaries, is the development of strategies to initiate and sustain community engagement in health care delivery systems. Objective In this commentary, we discuss the Baltimore “Community-based Organizations Neighborhood Network: Enhancing Capacity Together” Study. This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether or not a community engagement strategy, developed to address patient safety in low- and middle-income countries throughout sub-Saharan Africa, could be successfully applied to create and implement strategies that would link community-based organizations to a local health care system in Baltimore, a city in the United States. Specifically, we explore the trial’s activation of community knowledge brokers as the conduit through which community engagement, and innovation production, was achieved. Summary Cultivating community knowledge brokers holds promise as a vehicle for advancing global innovation in the context of health care delivery systems. As such, further efforts to discern the ways in which they may promote the development and dissemination of innovations in health care systems is warranted. Trial registration Trial Registration Number: NCT02222909. Trial Register Name: Reverse Innovation and Patient Engagement to Improve Quality of Care and Patient Outcomes (CONNECT). Date of Trial’s Registration: August 22, 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chidinma A Ibe
- Center for Health Services & Outcomes Research, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. .,Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, 2024 East Monument Street, Room 2-514, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Lopa Basu
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, 2024 East Monument Street, Room 2-514, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.,World Health Organization Service Delivery & Safety Department, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rachel Gooden
- World Health Organization Service Delivery & Safety Department, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Shamsuzzoha B Syed
- World Health Organization Service Delivery & Safety Department, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Viva Dadwal
- Centre on Governance, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lee R Bone
- Department of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Patti L Ephraim
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.,Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, USA
| | - Christine M Weston
- Center for Health Services & Outcomes Research, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Albert W Wu
- Center for Health Services & Outcomes Research, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.,Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, 2024 East Monument Street, Room 2-514, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aveling EL, Zegeye DT, Silverman M. Obstacles to implementation of an intervention to improve surgical services in an Ethiopian hospital: a qualitative study of an international health partnership project. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:393. [PMID: 27530439 PMCID: PMC4987978 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1639-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2016] [Accepted: 08/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Access to safe surgical care represents a critical gap in healthcare delivery and development in many low- and middle-income countries, including Ethiopia. Quality improvement (QI) initiatives at hospital level may contribute to closing this gap. Many such quality improvement initiatives are carried out through international health partnerships. Better understanding of how to optimise quality improvement in low-income settings is needed, including through partnership-based approaches. Drawing on a process evaluation of an intervention to improve surgical services in an Ethiopian hospital, this paper offers lessons to help meet this need. Methods We conducted a qualitative process evaluation of a quality improvement project which aimed to improve access to surgical services in an Ethiopian referral hospital through better management. Data was collected longitudinally and included: 66 in-depth interviews with surgical staff and project team members; observation (135 h) in the surgery department and of project meetings; project-related documentation. Thematic analysis, guided by theoretical constructs, focused on identifying obstacles to implementation. Results The project largely failed to achieve its goals. Key barriers related to project design, partnership working and the implementation context, and included: confusion over project objectives and project and partner roles and responsibilities; logistical challenges concerning overseas visits; difficulties in communication; gaps between the time and authority team members had and that needed to implement and engage other staff; limited strategies for addressing adaptive—as opposed to technical—challenges; effects of hierarchy and resource scarcity on QI efforts. While many of the obstacles identified are common to diverse settings, our findings highlight ways in which some features of low-income country contexts amplify these common challenges. Conclusion We identify lessons for optimising the design and planning of quality improvement interventions within such challenging healthcare contexts, with specific reference to international partnership-based approaches. These include: the need for a funded lead-in phase to clarify and agree goals, roles, mutual expectations and communication strategies; explicitly incorporating adaptive, as well as technical, solutions; transparent management of resources and opportunities; leadership which takes account of both formal and informal power structures; and articulating links between project goals and wider organisational interests. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1639-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma-Louise Aveling
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK. .,Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
| | | | - Michael Silverman
- Department of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, University of Leicester, University Rd, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Melby MK, Loh LC, Evert J, Prater C, Lin H, Khan OA. Beyond Medical "Missions" to Impact-Driven Short-Term Experiences in Global Health (STEGHs): Ethical Principles to Optimize Community Benefit and Learner Experience. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2016; 91:633-8. [PMID: 26630608 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000001009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Increasing demand for global health education in medical training has driven the growth of educational programs predicated on a model of short-term medical service abroad. Almost two-thirds of matriculating medical students expect to participate in a global health experience during medical school, continuing into residency and early careers. Despite positive intent, such short-term experiences in global health (STEGHs) may exacerbate global health inequities and even cause harm. Growing out of the "medical missions" tradition, contemporary participation continues to evolve. Ethical concerns and other disciplinary approaches, such as public health and anthropology, can be incorpo rated to increase effectiveness and sustainability, and to shift the culture of STEGHs from focusing on trainees and their home institutions to also considering benefits in host communities and nurtur ing partnerships. The authors propose four core principles to guide ethical development of educational STEGHs: (1) skills building in cross-cultural effective ness and cultural humility, (2) bidirectional participatory relationships, (3) local capacity building, and (4) long-term sustainability. Application of these principles highlights the need for assessment of STEGHs: data collection that allows transparent compar isons, standards of quality, bidirectionality of agreements, defined curricula, and ethics that meet both host and sending countries' standards and needs. To capture the enormous potential of STEGHs, a paradigm shift in the culture of STEGHs is needed to ensure that these experiences balance training level, personal competencies, medical and cross-cultural ethics, and educational objectives to minimize harm and maximize benefits for all involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa K Melby
- M.K. Melby is assistant professor, Departments of Anthropology and Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware. L.C. Loh is adjunct professor, Department of Clinical Public Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and director of programs, The 53rd Week, Brooklyn, New York. J. Evert is executive director, Child Family Health International, and faculty, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. C. Prater is internal medicine-pediatrics physician, Baltimore Medical System, Baltimore, Maryland. H. Lin is attending physician, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, assistant professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and executive director, The 53rd Week, Brooklyn, New York. O.A. Khan is associate vice chair, Department of Family and Community Medicine, and director, Global Health Residency Track, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, Delaware, and associate director, Delaware Health Sciences Alliance, Newark, Delaware
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beran D, Aebischer Perone S, Alcoba G, Bischoff A, Bussien CL, Eperon G, Hagon O, Heller O, Jacquerioz Bausch F, Perone N, Vogel T, Chappuis F. Partnerships in global health and collaborative governance: lessons learnt from the Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine at the Geneva University Hospitals. Global Health 2016; 12:14. [PMID: 27129684 PMCID: PMC4850714 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-016-0156-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In 2007 the “Crisp Report” on international partnerships increased interest in Northern countries on the way their links with Southern partners operated. Since its establishment in 2007 the Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine at the Geneva University Hospitals has developed a variety of partnerships. Frameworks to assess these partnerships are needed and recent attention in the field of public management on collaborative governance may provide a useful approach for analyzing international collaborations. Methods Projects of the Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine were analyzed by collaborators within the Division using the model proposed by Emerson and colleagues for collaborative governance, which comprises different components that assess the collaborative process. Results International projects within the Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine can be divided into four categories: Human resource development; Humanitarian response; Neglected Tropical Diseases and Noncommunicable diseases. For each of these projects there was a clear leader from the Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine as well as a local counterpart. These individuals were seen as leaders both due to their role in establishing the collaboration as well as their technical expertise. Across these projects the actual partners vary greatly. This diversity means a wide range of contributions to the collaboration, but also complexity in managing different interests. A common definition of the collaborative aims in each of the projects is both a formal and informal process. Legal, financial and administrative aspects of the collaboration are the formal elements. These can be a challenge based on different administrative requirements. Friendship is part of the informal aspects and helps contribute to a relationship that is not exclusively professional. Conclusion Using collaborative governance allows the complexity of managing partnerships to be presented. The framework used highlights the process of establishing collaborations, which is an element often negated by other more traditional models used in international partnerships. Applying the framework to the projects of the Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine highlights the importance of shared values and interests, credibility of partners, formal and informal methods of management as well as friendship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Beran
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland. .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | | | - Gabriel Alcoba
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexandre Bischoff
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Claire-Lise Bussien
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Gilles Eperon
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Hagon
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Olivia Heller
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolas Perone
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Vogel
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - François Chappuis
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Busse H, Aboneh EA, Tefera G. Learning from developing countries in strengthening health systems: an evaluation of personal and professional impact among global health volunteers at Addis Ababa University's Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (Ethiopia). Global Health 2014; 10:64. [PMID: 25190076 PMCID: PMC4172777 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-014-0064-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2014] [Accepted: 08/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The positive impact of global health activities by volunteers from the United States in low-and middle-income countries has been recognized. Most existing global health partnerships evaluate what knowledge, ideas, and activities the US institution transferred to the low- or middle-income country. However, what this fails to capture are what kinds of change happen to US-based partners due to engagement in global health partnerships, both at the individual and institutional levels. “Reverse innovation” is the term that is used in global health literature to describe this type of impact. The objectives of this study were to identify what kinds of impact global partnerships have on health volunteers from developed countries, advance this emerging body of knowledge, and improve understanding of methods and indicators for assessing reverse innovation. Methods The study population consisted of 80 US, Canada, and South Africa-based health care professionals who volunteered at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia. Surveys were web-based and included multiple choice and open-ended questions to assess global health competencies. The data were analyzed using IBRM SPSS® version 21 for quantitative analysis; the open-ended responses were coded using constant comparative analysis to identify themes. Results Of the 80 volunteers, 63 responded (79 percent response rate). Fifty-two percent of the respondents were male, and over 60 percent were 40 years of age and older. Eighty-three percent reported they accomplished their trip objectives, 95 percent would participate in future activities and 96 percent would recommend participation to other colleagues. Eighty-nine percent reported personal impact and 73 percent reported change on their professional development. Previous global health experience, multiple prior trips, and the desire for career advancement were associated with positive impact on professional development. Conclusion Professionally and personally meaningful learning happens often during global health outreach. Understanding this impact has important policy, economic, and programmatic implications. With the aid of improved monitoring and evaluation frameworks, the simple act of attempting to measure “reverse innovation” may represent a shift in how global health partnerships are perceived, drawing attention to the two-way learning and benefits that occur and improving effectiveness in global health partnership spending.
Collapse
|