Acetaminophen for self-reported sleep problems in an elderly population (ASLEEP): study protocol of a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial

Comparative study of the effects of ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and codeine in a model of orofacial postoperative pain in male and female rats

Pain management is a primary goal after oral surgeries, but little is known about sex differences in the sensitivity to analgesics. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of three drugs with analgesic potential on heat and mechanical hyperalgesia, spontaneous pain and locomotion on male and female rats subjected to a model of orofacial postoperative pain. Male and female Wistar rats were submitted to intraoral incision or sham surgery, and on postoperative day 3, the effect of the ibuprofen (30 and 100 mg/kg), acetaminophen (100 and 300 mg/kg) and codeine (3 and 10 mg/kg) was assessed on responses to heat and mechanical facial stimulation, facial grooming, and locomotion. Ibuprofen reduced heat and mechanical hyperalgesia and grooming behavior in male and female rats in a non-sedative dose; acetaminophen dose-dependently reduced the mechanical hyperalgesia and abolished the heat hyperalgesia and the grooming behavior but caused sedation in both sexes; codeine dose-dependently reduced the mechanical hyperalgesia in male and female rats, and reduced the heat hyperalgesia, but females were less sensitive than males. It reduced spontaneous facial grooming in both sexes, but induced hyperlocomotion in females. Ibuprofen presented the most favorable profile, since it reduced over 50% heat and mechanical hyperalgesia in male and female rats, and significantly reduced spontaneous pain, without causing sedation or affecting locomotion. The identification of sex differences in the sensitivity and safety profile of frequently used analgesics can help guide the choice of more effective individualized therapies for pain control.

Agility Training to Integratively Promote Neuromuscular, Cognitive, Cardiovascular and Psychosocial Function in Healthy Older Adults: A Study Protocol of a One-Year Randomized-Controlled Trial

Exercise training effectively mitigates aging-induced health and fitness impairments. Traditional training recommendations for the elderly focus separately on relevant physiological fitness domains, such as balance, flexibility, strength and endurance. Thus, a more holistic and functional training framework is needed. The proposed agility training concept integratively tackles spatial orientation, stop and go, balance and strength. The presented protocol aims at introducing a two-armed, one-year randomized controlled trial, evaluating the effects of this concept on neuromuscular, cardiovascular, cognitive and psychosocial health outcomes in healthy older adults. Eighty-five participants were enrolled in this ongoing trial. Seventy-nine participants completed baseline testing and were block-randomized to the agility training group or the inactive control group. All participants undergo pre- and post-testing with interim assessment after six months. The intervention group currently receives supervised, group-based agility training twice a week over one year, with progressively demanding perceptual, cognitive and physical exercises. Knee extension strength, reactive balance, dual task gait speed and the Agility Challenge for the Elderly (ACE) serve as primary endpoints and neuromuscular, cognitive, cardiovascular, and psychosocial meassures serve as surrogate secondary outcomes. Our protocol promotes a comprehensive exercise training concept for older adults, that might facilitate stakeholders in health and exercise to stimulate relevant health outcomes without relying on excessively time-consuming physical activity recommendations.