1
|
Chen Y, Wang M, Yang Y, Zeng M. Efficacy and Safety of Alprostadil in Microcirculatory Disturbances During Emergency PCI: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2024; 24:547-556. [PMID: 38850398 DOI: 10.1007/s40256-024-00655-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The clinical advantage of alprostadil [prostaglandin E1 (PGE1)] in the treatment of microcirculatory disturbances (defined as no-reflow or slow-flow) in acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still disputed. The purpose of our study was to review the efficacy of PGE1 supplements in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who had urgent PCI. DESIGN This study was a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, ProQuest, Scopus, the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Internet, the China Science and Technology Journal Database, and the Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform were used as sources. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES We included randomized controlled trials including PGE1 for the treatment of intraoperative microcirculatory disorders and major cardiovascular adverse events in emergency PCI in people with AMI. Independent data extraction was conducted, and study quality was assessed. The meta-analysis was carried out by using random effects models to calculate the risk ratio (RR) of microcirculatory disorders between groups receiving PGE1 and those receiving placebo, nitroglycerin, or tirofiban. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of microcirculatory disturbances. Secondary outcomes included corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count (cTFC), the percentage of patients with TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 3 (TMPG3), and the percentage of patients with myocardial blush grade 3 (MBG3) as efficacy indicators. Additionally, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days and 180 days were assessed as safety indicators. RESULTS There were 18 trials involving a total of 1458 participants. PGE1 significantly reduced the occurrence of microcirculation disorders compared with conventional medications and placebo [risk ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.63, I2 = 46%; cTFC (RR -4.74, 95% -6.85 to -2.63, I2 93%); percentage of patients with TMPG3 (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07-1.68, I2 70%) or MBG3 (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.19-1.49, I2 0%); major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in 30 days (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.86, I2 0%); and MACEs in 180 days (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28-0.60, I2 0%)]. CONCLUSIONS We found that PGE1 decreased the occurrence of micro-circulation disturbance in AMI and enhanced the outcome of PCI. Additional studies should be conducted to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Chen
- Medical Care Center, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hainan General Hospital, No. 19, Xiuhua Road, Xiuying District, Haikou, 570311, Hainan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Mengdi Wang
- Medical Care Center, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hainan General Hospital, No. 19, Xiuhua Road, Xiuying District, Haikou, 570311, Hainan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Yali Yang
- Medical Care Center, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hainan General Hospital, No. 19, Xiuhua Road, Xiuying District, Haikou, 570311, Hainan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Zeng
- Medical Care Center, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hainan General Hospital, No. 19, Xiuhua Road, Xiuying District, Haikou, 570311, Hainan Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santos JD, Dawson S, Conefrey C, Isaacs T, Khanum M, Faisal S, Paramasivan S. Most UK cardiovascular disease trial protocols feature criteria that exclude ethnic minority participants: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 167:111259. [PMID: 38215800 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We systematically reviewed UK cardiovascular disease (CVD) randomized controlled trial (RCT) protocols to identify the proportion featuring eligibility criteria that may disproportionately exclude ethnic minority (EM) participants. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, January 2014-June 2022, to identify UK CVD RCT protocols. We extracted nonclinical eligibility criteria from trial protocols and inductively categorized the trials by their language, consent, and broad (ambiguous) criteria. Findings are narratively reported. RESULTS Of the seventy included RCT protocols, most (87.1%; 61/70) mentioned consent within the eligibility criteria, with more than two-thirds (68.9%; 42/61) indicating a requirement for 'written' consent. Alternative consent pathways that can aid EM participation were absent. English language requirement was present in 22.9% (16/70) of the studies and 37.1% (26/70) featured broad criteria that are open to interpretation and subject to recruiter bias. Only 4.3% (3/70) protocols mentioned the provision of translation services. CONCLUSION Most UK CVD trial protocols feature eligibility criteria that potentially exclude EM groups. Trial eligibility criteria must be situated within a larger inclusive recruitment framework, where ethnicity is considered alongside other intersecting and disadvantaging identities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jhulia Dos Santos
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Shoba Dawson
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Carmel Conefrey
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Talia Isaacs
- UCL Centre for Applied Linguistics, IOE, UCL's Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mahwar Khanum
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Saba Faisal
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sangeetha Paramasivan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nazir SA, Shetye AM, Khan JN, Singh A, Arnold JR, Squire I, McCann GP. Inter-study repeatability of circumferential strain and diastolic strain rate by CMR tagging, feature tracking and tissue tracking in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 36:1133-1146. [PMID: 32152811 PMCID: PMC7228913 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01806-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Strain assessment allows accurate evaluation of myocardial function and mechanics in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Strain using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has traditionally been assessed with tagging but limitations of this technique have led to more widespread use of alternative methods, which may be more robust. We compared the inter-study repeatability of circumferential global peak-systolic strain (Ecc) and peak-early diastolic strain rate (PEDSR) derived by tagging with values obtained using novel cine-based software: Feature Tracking (FT) (TomTec, Germany) and Tissue Tracking (TT) (Circle cvi42, Canada) in patients following STEMI. Twenty male patients (mean age 56 ± 10 years, mean infarct size 13.7 ± 7.1% of left ventricular mass) were randomised to undergo CMR 1-5 days post-STEMI at 1.5 T or 3.0 T, repeated after ten minutes at the same field strength. Ecc and PEDSR were assessed using tagging, FT and TT. Inter-study repeatability was evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses, coefficients of variation (CoV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Ecc (%) was significantly lower with tagging than with FT or TT at 1.5 T (- 9.5 ± 3.3 vs. - 17.5 ± 3.8 vs. -15.5 ± 5.2, respectively, p < 0.001) and 3.0 T (- 13.1 ± 1.8 vs. - 19.4 ± 2.9 vs. - 17.3 ± 2.1, respectively, p = 0.001). This was similar for PEDSR (.s-1): 1.5 T (0.6 ± 0.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4 vs. 1.0 ± 0.4, for tagging, FT and TT respectively, p < 0.001) and 3.0 T (0.6 ± 0.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.3 vs. 0.9 ± 0.3, respectively, p < 0.001). Inter-study repeatability for Ecc at 1.5 T was good for tagging and excellent for FT and TT: CoV 16.7%, 6.38%, and 8.65%, respectively. Repeatability for Ecc at 3.0 T was good for all three techniques: CoV 14.4%, 11.2%, and 13.0%, respectively. However, repeatability of PEDSR was generally lower than that for Ecc at 1.5 T (CoV 15.1%, 13.1%, and 34.0% for tagging, FT and TT, respectively) and 3.0 T (CoV 23.0%, 18.6%, and 26.2%, respectively). Following STEMI, Ecc and PEDSR are higher when measured with FT and TT than with tagging. Inter-study repeatability of Ecc is good for tagging, excellent for FT and TT at 1.5 T, and good for all three methods at 3.0 T. The repeatability of PEDSR is good to moderate at 1.5 T and moderate at 3.0 T. Cine-based methods to assess Ecc following STEMI may be preferable to tagging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheraz A. Nazir
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF UK
| | - Abhishek M. Shetye
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF UK
| | - Jamal N. Khan
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF UK
| | - Anvesha Singh
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF UK
| | - Jayanth R. Arnold
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF UK
| | - Iain Squire
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF UK
| | - Gerry P. McCann
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kumar J, O’Connor CT, Kumar R, Arnous SK, Kiernan TJ. Coronary no-reflow in the modern era: a review of advances in diagnostic techniques and contemporary management. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2019; 17:605-623. [DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2019.1653187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jathinder Kumar
- Department of Cardiology University Hospital Limerick, GEMS, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Cormac T O’Connor
- Department of Cardiology University Hospital Limerick, GEMS, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Rajesh Kumar
- Department of Cardiology University Hospital Limerick, GEMS, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Samer Khalil Arnous
- Department of Cardiology University Hospital Limerick, GEMS, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Thomas J. Kiernan
- Department of Cardiology University Hospital Limerick, GEMS, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Coronary artery no-reflow phenomenon is an incidental outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. Despite advances in pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies, coronary no-reflow phenomenon occurs more commonly than desired. It often results in poor clinical outcomes and remains as a relevant consideration in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. In this systematic review, we have sought to discuss the topic in detail, and to relay the most recent discoveries and data on management of this condition. RECENT FINDINGS We discuss several pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments used in the prevention and management of coronary no-reflow and microvascular obstruction. Covered topics include the understanding of pharmacologic mechanisms of current and future agents, and recent discoveries that may result in the development of future treatment options. We conclude that the pathophysiology of coronary no-reflow phenomenon and microvascular obstruction still remains incompletely understood, although several plausible theories have led to the current standard of care for its management. We also conclude that coronary no-reflow phenomenon and microvascular obstruction must be recognized as a multifactorial condition that has certain predispositions and characteristics, therefore its prevention and treatment must begin pre-procedurally and be multi-faceted including certain medications and operator techniques in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmadreza Karimianpour
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart & Vascular Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| | - Anbukarasi Maran
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart & Vascular Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Management of No-Reflow Phenomenon in the Catheterization Laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10:215-223. [PMID: 28183461 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
At the conclusion of a primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and after the cardiologist makes certain that there is no residual stenosis following stenting, assessment of coronary flow becomes the top priority. The presence of no-reflow is a serious prognostic sign. No-reflow can result in poor healing of the infarct and adverse left ventricular remodeling, increasing the risk for major adverse cardiac events, including congestive heart failure and death. To achieve normal flow, features associated with a high incidence of no-reflow must be anticipated, and measures must be undertaken to prevent its occurrence. In this review, the authors discuss various preventive strategies for no-reflow as well as pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions that improve coronary blood flow, such as intracoronary adenosine and nitroprusside. Nonpharmacological therapies, such as induced hypothermia, were successful in animal studies, but their effectiveness in reducing no-reflow in humans remains to be determined.
Collapse
|
7
|
Nazir SA, McCann GP, Greenwood JP, Kunadian V, Khan JN, Mahmoud IZ, Blackman DJ, Been M, Abrams KR, Shipley L, Wilcox R, Adgey AAJ, Gershlick AH. Strategies to attenuate micro-vascular obstruction during P-PCI: the randomized reperfusion facilitated by local adjunctive therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial. Eur Heart J 2016; 37:1910-9. [PMID: 27147610 PMCID: PMC4917746 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2015] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Microvascular obstruction (MVO) following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) contributes to infarct expansion, left ventricular (LV) remodelling, and worse clinical outcomes. The REFLO-STEMI trial tested whether intra-coronary (IC) high-dose adenosine or sodium nitroprusside (SNP) reduce infarct size and/or MVO determined by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods and results REFLO-STEMI, a prospective, open-label, multi-centre trial with blinded endpoints, randomized (1:1:1) 247 STEMI patients with single vessel disease presenting within 6 h of symptom onset to IC adenosine (2–3 mg total) or SNP (500 μg total) immediately following thrombectomy and again following stenting, or to standard PPCI. The primary endpoint was infarct size % LV mass (%LVM) on CMR undertaken 24–96 h after PPCI (n = 197). Clinical follow-up was to 6 months. There was no significant difference in infarct size (%LVM, median, interquartile range, IQR) between adenosine (10.1, 4.7–16.2), SNP (10.0, 4.2–15.8), and control (8.3, 1.9–14.0), P = 0.062 and P = 0.160, respectively, vs. control. MVO (% LVM, median, IQR) was similar across groups (1.0, 0.0–3.7, P = 0.205 and 0.6, 0.0–2.4, P = 0.244 for adenosine and SNP, respectively, vs. control 0.3, 0.0–2.8). On per-protocol analysis, infarct size (%LV mass, 12.0 vs. 8.3, P = 0.031), major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio, HR, 5.39 [1.18–24.60], P = 0.04) at 30 days and 6 months (HR 6.53 [1.46–29.2], P = 0.01) were increased and ejection fraction reduced (42.5 ± 7.2% vs. 45.7 ± 8.0%, P = 0.027) in adenosine-treated patients compared with control. Conclusions High-dose IC adenosine and SNP during PPCI did not reduce infarct size or MVO measured by CMR. Furthermore, adenosine may adversely affect mid-term clinical outcome. Clinical Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01747174; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01747174
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheraz A Nazir
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Gerry P McCann
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - John P Greenwood
- Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Vijay Kunadian
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University and Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jamal N Khan
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Islam Z Mahmoud
- Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Rayne Institute, BHF Excellence Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel J Blackman
- Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Martin Been
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Keith R Abrams
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Lorraine Shipley
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Robert Wilcox
- Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Anthony H Gershlick
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Borea PA, Gessi S, Merighi S, Varani K. Adenosine as a Multi-Signalling Guardian Angel in Human Diseases: When, Where and How Does it Exert its Protective Effects? Trends Pharmacol Sci 2016; 37:419-434. [PMID: 26944097 DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2016.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 203] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2015] [Revised: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The importance of adenosine for human health cannot be overstated. Indeed, this ubiquitous nucleoside is an integral component of ATP, and regulates the function of every tissue and organ in the body. Acting via receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms [the former mediated via four G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), A1, A2A, A2B, and A3,], it has a significant role in protecting against cell damage in areas of increased tissue metabolism, and combating organ dysfunction in numerous pathological states. Accordingly, raised levels of adenosine have been demonstrated in epilepsy, ischaemia, pain, inflammation, and cancer, in which its behaviour can be likened to that of a guardian angel, even though there are instances in which overproduction of adenosine is pathological. In this review, we condense the current body of knowledge on the issue, highlighting when, where, and how adenosine exerts its protective effects in both the brain and the periphery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier Andrea Borea
- Department of Medical Sciences, Pharmacology Section, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara, 17-19, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
| | - Stefania Gessi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Pharmacology Section, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara, 17-19, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
| | - Stefania Merighi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Pharmacology Section, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara, 17-19, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
| | - Katia Varani
- Department of Medical Sciences, Pharmacology Section, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara, 17-19, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bulluck H, Sirker A, Loke YK, Garcia-Dorado D, Hausenloy DJ. Clinical benefit of adenosine as an adjunct to reperfusion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol 2016; 202:228-37. [PMID: 26402450 PMCID: PMC4669305 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2015] [Revised: 07/08/2015] [Accepted: 09/04/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adenosine administered as an adjunct to reperfusion can reduce coronary no-reflow and limit myocardial infarct (MI) size in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Whether adjunctive adenosine therapy can improve clinical outcomes in reperfused STEMI patients is not clear and is investigated in this meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS We performed an up-to-date search for all RCTs investigating adenosine as an adjunct to reperfusion in STEMI patients. We calculated pooled relative risks using a fixed-effect meta-analysis assessing the impact of adjunctive adenosine therapy on major clinical endpoint including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Surrogate markers of reperfusion were also analyzed. RESULTS 13 RCTs (4273 STEMI patients) were identified and divided into 2 subgroups: intracoronary adenosine versus control (8 RCTs) and intravenous adenosine versus control (5 RCTs). In patients administered intracoronary adenosine, the incidence of heart failure was significantly lower (risk ratio [RR] 0.44 [95% CI 0.25-0.78], P=0.005) and the incidence of coronary no-reflow was reduced (RR for TIMI flow<3 postreperfusion 0.68 [95% CI 0.47-0.99], P=0.04). There was no difference in heart failure incidence in the intravenous adenosine group but most RCTs in this subgroup were from the thrombolysis era. There was no difference in non-fatal MI or all-cause mortality in both subgroups. CONCLUSION We find evidence of improved clinical outcome in terms of less heart failure in STEMI patients administered intracoronary adenosine as an adjunct to reperfusion. This finding will need to be confirmed in a large adequately powered prospective RCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heerajnarain Bulluck
- The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HX, UK; The Heart Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK
| | - Alex Sirker
- The Heart Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK
| | - Yoon K Loke
- University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - David Garcia-Dorado
- Cardiology Department, Valld'Hebron Hospital, Universitat Autónomade Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Derek J Hausenloy
- The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HX, UK; The Heart Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore; National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fordyce CB, Gersh BJ, Stone GW, Granger CB. Novel therapeutics in myocardial infarction: targeting microvascular dysfunction and reperfusion injury. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2015; 36:605-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2015.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2015] [Revised: 06/12/2015] [Accepted: 06/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
11
|
Adenosine as an Adjunct Therapy in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: Myth or Truth? Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2015; 29:481-93. [DOI: 10.1007/s10557-015-6606-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
12
|
Khan JN, Nazir SA, Horsfield MA, Singh A, Kanagala P, Greenwood JP, Gershlick AH, McCann GP. Comparison of semi-automated methods to quantify infarct size and area at risk by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths. BMC Res Notes 2015; 8:52. [PMID: 25889795 PMCID: PMC4347654 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1007-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2014] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is currently no gold standard technique for quantifying infarct size (IS) and ischaemic area-at-risk (AAR [oedema]) on late gadolinium enhancement imaging (LGE) and T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery imaging (T2w-STIR) respectively. This study aimed to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of IS and AAR quantification on LGE and T2w-STIR imaging using Otsu's Automated Technique (OAT) with currently used methods at 1.5T and 3.0T post acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS Ten patients were assessed at 1.5T and 10 at 3.0T. IS was assessed on LGE using 5-8 standard-deviation thresholding (5-8SD), full-width half-maximum (FWHM) quantification and OAT. AAR was assessed on T2w-STIR using 2SD and OAT. Accuracy was assessed by comparison with manual quantification. Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities were assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis. IS using each technique was correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). RESULTS FWHM and 8SD-derived IS closely correlated with manual assessment at both field strengths (1.5T: 18.3 ± 10.7% LV Mass [LVM] with FWHM, 17.7 ± 14.4% LVM with 8SD, 16.5 ± 10.3% LVM with manual quantification; 3.0T: 10.8 ± 8.2% LVM with FWHM, 11.4 ± 9.0% LVM with 8SD, 11.5 ± 9.0% LVM with manual quantification). 5SD and OAT overestimated IS at both field strengths. OAT, 2SD and manually quantified AAR closely correlated at 1.5T, but OAT overestimated AAR compared with manual assessment at 3.0T. IS and AAR derived by FWHM and OAT respectively had better reproducibility compared with manual and SD-based quantification. FWHM IS correlated strongest with LVEF. CONCLUSIONS FWHM quantification of IS is accurate, reproducible and correlates strongly with LVEF, whereas 5SD and OAT overestimate IS. OAT accurately assesses AAR at 1.5T and with excellent reproducibility. OAT overestimated AAR at 3.0T and thus cannot be recommended as the preferred method for AAR quantification at 3.0T.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamal N Khan
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, LE3 9QP, Leicester, UK.
| | - Sheraz A Nazir
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, LE3 9QP, Leicester, UK.
| | - Mark A Horsfield
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, LE3 9QP, Leicester, UK.
| | - Anvesha Singh
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, LE3 9QP, Leicester, UK.
| | - Prathap Kanagala
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, LE3 9QP, Leicester, UK.
| | - John P Greenwood
- Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health and Therapeutics, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, UK.
| | - Anthony H Gershlick
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, LE3 9QP, Leicester, UK.
| | - Gerry P McCann
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, LE3 9QP, Leicester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|