1
|
Carstensen K, Kjeldsen AM, Lou S, Nielsen CP. The Danish health care quality programme: Creating change through the use of quality improvement collaboratives. Health Policy 2022; 126:749-754. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
2
|
OUP accepted manuscript. J Appl Lab Med 2022; 7:1476-1491. [DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfac011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
3
|
McCarthy SE, Jabakhanji SB, Martin J, Flynn MA, Sørensen J. Reporting standards, outcomes and costs of quality improvement studies in Ireland: a scoping review. BMJ Open Qual 2021; 10:bmjoq-2020-001319. [PMID: 34341016 PMCID: PMC8330587 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To profile the aims and characteristics of quality improvement (QI) initiatives conducted in Ireland, to review the quality of their reporting and to assess outcomes and costs. DESIGN Scoping review. DATA SOURCES Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, Lenus and rian.ie. Two researchers independently screened abstracts (n=379) and separately reviewed 43 studies identified for inclusion using a 70-item critique tool. The tool was based on the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS), an appraisal instrument for QI intervention publications, and health economics reporting criteria. After reaching consensus, the final dataset was analysed using descriptive statistics. To support interpretations, findings were presented at a national stakeholder workshop. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA QI studies implemented and evaluated in Ireland and published between January 2015 and April 2020. RESULTS The 43 studies represented various QI interventions. Most studies were peer-reviewed publications (n=37), conducted in hospitals (n=38). Studies mainly aimed to improve the 'effectiveness' (65%), 'efficiency' (53%), 'timeliness' (47%) and 'safety' (44%) of care. Fewer aimed to improve 'patient-centredness' (30%), 'value for money' (23%) or 'staff well-being' (9%). No study aimed to increase 'equity'. Seventy per cent of studies described 14 of 16 QI-MQCS dimensions. Least often studies reported the 'penetration/reach' of an initiative and only 35% reported health outcomes. While 53% of studies expressed awareness of costs, only eight provided at least one quantifiable figure for costs or savings. No studies assessed the cost-effectiveness of the QI. CONCLUSION Irish QI studies included in our review demonstrate varied aims and high reporting standards. Strategies are needed to support greater stimulation and dissemination of QI beyond the hospital sector and awareness of equity issues as QI work. Systematic measurement and reporting of costs and outcomes can be facilitated by integrating principles of health economics in QI education and guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siobhán Eithne McCarthy
- Graduate School of Healthcare Management, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Samira Barbara Jabakhanji
- Healthcare Outcomes Research Centre, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jennifer Martin
- National Quality Improvement Team, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maureen Alice Flynn
- National Quality Improvement Team, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jan Sørensen
- Healthcare Outcomes Research Centre, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tello JE, Barbazza E, Waddell K. Review of 128 quality of care mechanisms: A framework and mapping for health system stewards. Health Policy 2020; 124:12-24. [PMID: 31791717 PMCID: PMC6946442 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Health system stewards have the critical task to identify quality of care deficiencies and resolve underlying system limitations. Despite a growing evidence-base on the effectiveness of certain mechanisms for improving quality of care, frameworks to facilitate the oversight function of stewards and the use of mechanisms to improve outcomes remain underdeveloped. This review set out to catalogue a wide range of quality of care mechanisms and evidence on their effectiveness, and to map these in a framework along two dimensions: (i) governance subfunctions; and (ii) targets of quality of care mechanisms. To identify quality of care mechanisms, a series of searches were run in Health Systems Evidence and PubMed. Additional grey literature was reviewed. A total of 128 quality of care mechanisms were identified. For each mechanism, searches were carried out for systematic reviews on their effectiveness. These findings were mapped in the framework defined. The mapping illustrates the range and evidence for mechanisms varies and is more developed for some target areas such as the health workforce. Across the governance sub-functions, more mechanisms and with evidence of effectiveness are found for setting priorities and standards and organizing and monitoring for action. This framework can support system stewards to map the quality of care mechanisms used in their systems and to uncover opportunities for optimization backed by systems thinking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan E Tello
- Integrated Prevention and Control of NCDs Programme, Division of NCDs and Promoting Health through the Life-Course, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Erica Barbazza
- Academic UMC, Department of Public Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; WHO European Centre for Primary Health Care, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
| | - Kerry Waddell
- McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; WHO European Centre for Primary Health Care, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dixon N, Wellsteed L. Effects of team-based quality improvement learning on two teams providing dementia care. BMJ Open Qual 2019; 8:e000500. [PMID: 31259282 PMCID: PMC6567950 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the effects of a structured team-based learning approach to quality improvement (QI) on the performance 12 months later of two teams caring for patients with dementia. Design Before and after prospective study. Setting Staff working in two inpatient services in National Health Service Trusts in England, one providing orthopaedic surgery (Team A) and one caring for elderly people with mental health conditions, including dementia (Team B). Team A consisted of nurses; Team B included doctors, nurses, therapists, mental health support workers and administrators. Methods QI training and support, assessment of the performance of teams and team coaching were provided to the two teams. QI training integrated tools for teamworking and a structured approach to QI. Team members completed the Aston Team Performance Inventory, a validated tool for assessing team performance, at the start of the QI work (time 1) and 1 year later (time 2). Results A year after the QI training and team QI project, Team A members perceived themselves as a high-performing team, reflected in improvement in 24 of 52 components measured in the Inventory; Team B was initially a poorly performing team and had improvements in 42 of 52 components a year later. Conclusion This study demonstrates that a structured team-based learning approach to QI has effects a year later on the performance of teams in clinical settings, as measured by a validated team performance tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Dixon
- Strategic Services, Healthcare Quality Quest, Romsey, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Improving the adoption of optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in critically ill patients: A process evaluation of a complex quality improvement initiative. J Crit Care 2018; 50:111-117. [PMID: 30529419 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Revised: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluated a complex initiative to increase evidence-based use of low molecular weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among adult medical-surgical ICU patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study included: quantitative survey and interviews. Participants were healthcare providers within four ICUs. Surveys collected knowledge of evidence underpinning best practice, exposure to the implementation strategies and their perceived utility, and recommendations. The interview expanded on survey topics. Descriptive statistics summarized the data and chi-squared tests were used to compare groups. Qualitative data were analyzed using a blended deductive and inductive coding approach. RESULTS Providers had good knowledge of the evidence (range = 58% to 94%). Pharmacist-to-physician reminders (80%), other reminders (50%), and local guidelines (50%) were the most commonly observed strategies. Local champions (76%), on-site education (74%), and computerized decision support system (69%) were perceived to be most helpful. Interviews elicited five themes: provider roles, perceptions of the implementation strategies, facilitators and barriers to uptake of best practice, and recommendations. Assessment of the implementation strategies varied by professional group. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this process evaluation identified implementation strategies that can improve the use of evidence-informed practices, help interpret outcomes in the context of interventions and guide future quality improvement initiatives.
Collapse
|
7
|
Spitzer-Shohat S, Goldfracht M, Key C, Hoshen M, Balicer RD, Shadmi E. Primary care networks and team effectiveness: the case of a large-scale quality improvement disparity reduction program. J Interprof Care 2018; 33:472-480. [PMID: 30422722 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1538942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Documentation of primary care teams' involvement in disparity reduction efforts exists, yet little is known about how teams interact or perceive their effectiveness. We investigated how the social network and structural ties among primary-care-clinic team members relate to their perceived team effectiveness (TE), in a large-scale disparity reduction intervention in Israel's largest insurer and provider of services. A mixed-method design of Social Network Analysis and qualitative data collection was employed. 108 interviews with medical, nursing, and administrative teams of 26 clinics and their respective managerial units were performed and information on the organizational ties, analyzing density and centrality, collected. Pearson correlations examined association between network measures and perceived TE. Clinics with strong intra-clinic density and high clinic-subregional-management density were positively correlated with perceived TE. Clinic in-degree centrality was also positively associated with perceived TE. Qualitative analyses support these findings with teamwork emerging as a factor which can impede or facilitate teams' ability to design and implement disparity reduction interventions. The study demonstrates that in an organization-wide disparity reduction initiative, cohesive intra-network structure and close relations with mid-level management increase the likelihood that teams perceive themselves as possessing the skills and resources needed to lead and implement disparity reduction efforts. List of abbreviations Team Effectiveness (TE); Clalit Health Services (Clalit); Social Network Analysis (SNA); Quality Improvement (QI); National Health Care Collaborative (NHPC); Tampa Bay Community Cancer Network (TBCCN).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Spitzer-Shohat
- Department of Population Health, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University , Safed , Israel.,Center for Health and the Social Sciences, University of Chicago , IL , USA
| | - M Goldfracht
- Clalit Community Division, Clalit Health Services , Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - C Key
- Clalit Community Division, Clalit Health Services , Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - M Hoshen
- Clalit Research Institute, Chief Physician's Office, Clalit Health Services , Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - R D Balicer
- Clalit Research Institute, Chief Physician's Office, Clalit Health Services , Tel Aviv , Israel.,Epidemiology Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University , Beer-Sheva , Israel
| | - E Shadmi
- Clalit Research Institute, Chief Physician's Office, Clalit Health Services , Tel Aviv , Israel.,Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa , Beer-Sheva , Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rowland P, Lising D, Sinclair L, Baker GR. Team dynamics within quality improvement teams: a scoping review. Int J Qual Health Care 2018; 30:416-422. [PMID: 29617795 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2017] [Accepted: 03/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This scoping review examines what is known about the processes of quality improvement (QI) teams, particularly related to how teams impact outcomes. The aim is to provide research-informed guidance for QI leaders and to inform future research questions. Data sources Databases searched included: MedLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and SCOPUS. Study selection Eligible publications were written in English, published between 1999 and 2016. Articles were included in the review if they examined processes of the QI team, were related to healthcare QI and were primary research studies. Studies were excluded if they had insufficient detail regarding QI team processes. Data extraction Descriptive detail extracted included: authors, geographical region and health sector. The Integrated (Health Care) Team Effectiveness Model was used to synthesize findings of studies along domains of team effectiveness: task design, team process, psychosocial traits and organizational context. Results of data synthesis Over two stages of searching, 4813 citations were reviewed. Of those, 48 full-text articles are included in the synthesis. This review demonstrates that QI teams are not immune from dysfunction. Further, a dysfunctional QI team is not likely to influence practice. However, a functional QI team alone is unlikely to create change. A positive QI team dynamic may be a necessary but insufficient condition for implementing QI strategies. Conclusions Areas for further research include: interactions between QI teams and clinical microsystems, understanding the role of interprofessional representation on QI teams and exploring interactions between QI team task, composition and process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Rowland
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Interprofessional Education, University of Toronto/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Cross-Appointed Researcher, Wilson Centre for Research in Education, University Health Network/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dean Lising
- Centre for Interprofessional Education, University of Toronto/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lynne Sinclair
- Centre for Interprofessional Education, University of Toronto/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - G Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation , Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dickinson WP, Dickinson LM, Jortberg BT, Hessler DM, Fernald DH, Fisher L. A protocol for a cluster randomized trial comparing strategies for translating self-management support into primary care practices. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2018; 19:126. [PMID: 30041598 PMCID: PMC6058364 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0810-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced primary care models emphasize patient-centered care, including self-management support (SMS), but the effective use of SMS for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) remains a challenge. Interactive behavior-change technology (IBCT) can facilitate the adoption of SMS interventions. To meet the need for effective SMS intervention, we have developed Connection to Health (CTH), a comprehensive, evidence-based SMS program that enhances interactions between primary care clinicians and patients to resolve self-management problems and improve outcomes. Uptake and maintenance of programs such as CTH in primary care have been limited by the inability of practices to adapt and implement program components into their culture, patient flow, and work processes. Practice facilitation has been shown to be effective in helping practices make the changes required for optimal program implementation. The proposed research is designed to promote the translation of SMS into primary care practices for patients with T2DM by combining two promising lines of research, specifically, (a) testing the effectiveness of CTH in diverse primary-care practices, and (b) evaluating the impact of practice facilitation to enhance implementation of the intervention. METHODS A three-arm, cluster-randomized trial will evaluate three discrete strategies for implementing SMS for patients with T2DM in diverse primary care practices. Practices will be randomly assigned to receive and implement the CTH program, the CTH program plus practice facilitation, or a SMS academic detailing educational intervention. Through this design, we will compare the effectiveness, adoption and implementation of these three SMS practice implementation strategies. Primary effectiveness outcomes including lab values and evidence of SMS will be abstracted from medical records covering baseline through 18 months post-baseline. Data from CTH assessments and action plans completed by patients enrolled in CTH will be used to evaluate practice implementation of CTH and the impact of CTH participation. Qualitative data including field notes from encounters with the practices and interviews of practice personnel will be analyzed to assess practice implementation of SMS. DISCUSSION This study will provide important information on the implementation of SMS in primary care, the effectiveness of an IBCT tool such as CTH, and the use of practice facilitation to assist implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov - ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01945918 , date 08/27/2013. Modifications have been updated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W. Perry Dickinson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Ave., Mail Stop F496, Aurora, CO 80045-0508 USA
| | - L. Miriam Dickinson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Ave., Mail Stop F496, Aurora, CO 80045-0508 USA
| | - Bonnie T. Jortberg
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Ave., Mail Stop F496, Aurora, CO 80045-0508 USA
| | - Danielle M. Hessler
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Douglas H. Fernald
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Ave., Mail Stop F496, Aurora, CO 80045-0508 USA
| | - Lawrence Fisher
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Park JS, Moore JE, Sayal R, Holmes BJ, Scarrow G, Graham ID, Jeffs L, Timmings C, Rashid S, Johnson AM, Straus SE. Evaluation of the "Foundations in Knowledge Translation" training initiative: preparing end users to practice KT. Implement Sci 2018; 13:63. [PMID: 29695267 PMCID: PMC5918493 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0755-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current knowledge translation (KT) training initiatives are primarily focused on preparing researchers to conduct KT research rather than on teaching KT practice to end users. Furthermore, training initiatives that focus on KT practice have not been rigorously evaluated and have focused on assessing short-term outcomes and participant satisfaction only. Thus, there is a need for longitudinal training evaluations that assess the sustainability of training outcomes and contextual factors that may influence outcomes. METHODS We evaluated the KT training initiative "Foundations in KT" using a mixed-methods longitudinal design. "Foundations in KT" provided training in KT practice and included three tailored in-person workshops, coaching, and an online platform for training materials and knowledge exchange. Two cohorts were included in the study (62 participants, including 46 "Foundations in KT" participants from 16 project teams and 16 decision-maker partners). Participants completed self-report questionnaires, focus groups, and interviews at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the first workshop. RESULTS Participant-level outcomes include survey results which indicated that participants' self-efficacy in evidence-based practice (F(1,8.9) = 23.7, p = 0.001, n = 45), KT activities (F(1,23.9) = 43.2, p < 0.001, n = 45), and using evidence to inform practice increased over time (F(1,11.0) = 6.0, p = 0.03, n = 45). Interviews and focus groups illustrated that participants' understanding of and confidence in using KT increased from baseline to 24 months after the workshop. Interviews and focus groups suggested that the training initiative helped participants achieve their KT project objectives, plan their projects, and solve problems over time. Contextual factors include teams with high self-reported organizational capacity and commitment to implement at the start of their project had buy-in from upper management that resulted in secured funding and resources for their project. Training initiative outcomes include participants who applied the KT knowledge and skills they learned to other projects by sharing their knowledge informally with coworkers. Sustained spread of KT practice was observed with five teams at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS We completed a longitudinal evaluation of a KT training initiative. Positive participant outcomes were sustained until 24 months after the initial workshop. Given the emphasis on implementing evidence and the need to train implementers, these findings are promising for future KT training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie S. Park
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Julia E. Moore
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Radha Sayal
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Bev J. Holmes
- Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
| | - Gayle Scarrow
- Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
| | | | - Lianne Jeffs
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Caitlyn Timmings
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Shusmita Rashid
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | | | - Sharon E. Straus
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Background The Norwegian teaching nursing home (TNH) programme was launched in 1997 to address the continued challenges and threats to quality in long-term care. They included high turnover, inadequate recruitment of qualified staff, poor image and inadequate learning opportunities in long-term care for students, and lack of opportunities for knowledge and skill development for staff. Research into the particular challenges and needs in long-term care was very limited. The aim of the programmes was to establish partnerships between selected nursing homes, universities and university colleges. Together the institutions would address the challenges by developing quality development programmes, initiating research and improving teaching in collaboration. During the first project period (1997-2003), the TNHs proved to be efficient in launching quality-improvement programmes, improving teaching of students and staff and supporting relevant research. Following a formal evaluation, the programme was established on a permanent basis in 2004. Since then the programme has gone through a number of changes, including growing in numbers, being widened to include home care services, and changing focus from local developments to also being vehicles for national quality initiatives. Aim This paper describes the current programme of teaching nursing homes in relation to its goals, organisation and responsibilities. Results The strong learning network among the institutions contributes to the robustness of the programme which focuses on developing and implementing evidence-based care and creative learning environments for students and staff. Conclusions The programme has altered since its inception to ensure it remains a sustainable innovation for improving the care of older people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Kirkevold
- Professor, Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boyd JM, Moore L, Atenafu EG, Hamid JS, Nathens A, Stelfox HT. A retrospective cohort study of the relationship between quality indicator measurement and patient outcomes in adult trauma centers in the United States. Injury 2017; 48:13-19. [PMID: 27847191 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2016] [Revised: 10/14/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving care is a key strategy for reducing the burden of injuries, but it is unknown whether the use of quality indicators (QI) is associated with patient outcomes. We sought to evaluate the association between the use of QIs by trauma centers and outcomes in adult injury patients. METHODS We identified consecutive adult patients (n=223,015) admitted to 233 verified trauma centers January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2010 that contributed data to the National Trauma Data Bank and participated in a survey of QI practices. Generalized Linear Mixed Models were employed to evaluate the association between the intensity (number of QIs) and nature (report cards, internal and external benchmarking) of QI use and survival to hospital discharge, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS There were no significant differences in the odds of survival to trauma center discharge according to the number of QIs measured (quartiles; odds ratio{OR} [95% confidence interval{CI}] 1.00 vs. 1.08 [0.90-1.31] vs. 1.00 [0.82-1.22] vs. 1.21 [0.99-1.49]), or whether centers used reports cards (OR 1.07, 95%CI 0.94-1.23), internal (OR 1.06, 95%CI 0.89-1.26) or external (OR 1.09, 95%CI 0.92-1.31) benchmarking. The duration (geometric mean) of mechanical ventilation (4.0days), ICU stay (4.6days), hospital stay (7.7days) and proportion of patients with a complication (13.6%) did not significantly differ according to the intensity or nature of QI use. CONCLUSIONS The intensity and nature of the QIs used by trauma centers was not associated with outcomes of patient care. Alternative quality improvement strategies may be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie M Boyd
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; W21C Research and Innovation Center, Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Lynne Moore
- Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
| | - Eshetu G Atenafu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Jemila S Hamid
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Micheal's Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
| | - Avery Nathens
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Henry T Stelfox
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
White DE, Norris JM, Jackson K, Khandwala F. Barriers and facilitators of Canadian quality and safety teams: a mixed-methods study exploring the views of health care leaders. J Healthc Leadersh 2016; 8:127-137. [PMID: 29355203 PMCID: PMC5741004 DOI: 10.2147/jhl.s116477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care organizations are utilizing quality and safety (QS) teams as a mechanism to optimize care. However, there is a lack of evidence-informed best practices for creating and sustaining successful QS teams. This study aimed to understand what health care leaders viewed as barriers and facilitators to establishing/implementing and measuring the impact of Canadian acute care QS teams. METHODS Organizational senior leaders (SLs) and QS team leaders (TLs) participated. A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design included surveys (n=249) and interviews (n=89). Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables for region, organization size, and leader position. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed for constant comparison analysis. RESULTS Five qualitative themes overlapped with quantitative data: (1) resources, time, and capacity; (2) data availability and information technology; (3) leadership; (4) organizational plan and culture; and (5) team composition and processes. Leaders from larger organizations more often reported that clear objectives and physician champions facilitated QS teams (p<0.01). Fewer Eastern respondents viewed board/senior leadership as a facilitator (p<0.001), and fewer Ontario respondents viewed geography as a barrier to measurement (p<0.001). TLs and SLs differed on several factors, including time to meet with the team, data availability, leadership, and culture. CONCLUSION QS teams need strong, committed leaders who align initiatives to strategic directions of the organization, foster a quality culture, and provide tools teams require for their work. There are excellent opportunities to create synergy across the country to address each organization's quality agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Karen Jackson
- Workforce Research and Evaluation, Alberta Health Services
| | - Farah Khandwala
- Cancer Care Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stelfox HT, Lane D, Boyd JM, Taylor S, Perrier L, Straus S, Zygun D, Zuege DJ. A scoping review of patient discharge from intensive care: opportunities and tools to improve care. Chest 2015; 147:317-327. [PMID: 25210942 DOI: 10.1378/chest.13-2965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We conducted a scoping review to systematically review the literature reporting patient discharge from ICUs, identify facilitators and barriers to high-quality care, and describe tools developed to improve care. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Data were extracted on the article type, study details for research articles, patient population, phase of care during discharge, and dimensions of health-care quality. RESULTS From 8,154 unique publications we included 224 articles. Of these, 131 articles (58%) were original research, predominantly case series (23%) and cohort (16%) studies; 12% were narrative reviews; and 11% were guidelines/policies. Common themes included patient and family needs/experiences (29% of articles) and the importance of complete and accurate information (26%). Facilitators of high-quality care included provider-patient communication (30%), provider-provider communication (25%), and the use of guidelines/policies (29%). Patient and family anxiety (21%) and limited availability of ICU and ward resources (26%) were reported barriers to high-quality care. A total of 47 tools to facilitate patient discharge from the ICU were identified and focused on patient evaluation for discharge (29%), discharge planning and teaching (47%), and optimized discharge summaries (23%). CONCLUSIONS Common themes, facilitators and barriers related to patient and family needs/experiences, communication, and the use of guidelines/policies to standardize patient discharge from ICU transcend the literature. Candidate tools to improve care are available; comparative evaluation is needed prior to broad implementation and could be tested through local quality-improvement programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry T Stelfox
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services - Calgary Zone, Calgary, AB; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services - Calgary Zone, Calgary, AB.
| | - Dan Lane
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services - Calgary Zone, Calgary, AB
| | - Jamie M Boyd
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services - Calgary Zone, Calgary, AB
| | - Simon Taylor
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services - Calgary Zone, Calgary, AB
| | - Laure Perrier
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB; Department of Community Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Saint Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON; Department of Continuing Education and Professional Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Sharon Straus
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Saint Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Saint Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON; Department of Medicine Hospital, Saint Michael's University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - David Zygun
- Division of Critical Care, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services - Edmonton Zone Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Danny J Zuege
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services - Calgary Zone, Calgary, AB
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Starr SR, Kautz JM, Sorita A, Thompson KM, Reed DA, Porter BL, Mapes DL, Roberts CC, Kuo D, Bora PR, Elraiyah TA, Murad MH, Ting HH. Quality Improvement Education for Health Professionals. Am J Med Qual 2015; 31:209-16. [DOI: 10.1177/1062860614566445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Kuo
- University of Washington Internal Medicine Residency Program, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | - Henry H. Ting
- New York Presbyterian Hospital and Healthcare System, The University Hospital for Columbia and Cornell, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stelfox HT, Straus SE. Letter reply to Kris Doggen et al.: The right indicator for the job: different levels of rigor may be appropriate for the development of quality indicators. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67:964-5. [PMID: 24837297 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2014] [Revised: 02/15/2014] [Accepted: 02/15/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Henry T Stelfox
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Teaching Research & Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4Z6; Department of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Teaching Research & Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4Z6.
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Saint Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Carr ECJ, Meredith P, Chumbley G, Killen R, Prytherch DR, Smith GB. Pain: a quality of care issue during patients' admission to hospital. J Adv Nurs 2013; 70:1391-403. [PMID: 24224703 DOI: 10.1111/jan.12301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM To determine the extent of clinically significant pain suffered by hospitalized patients during their stay and at discharge. BACKGROUND The management of pain in hospitals continues to be problematic, despite long-standing awareness of the problem and improvements, e.g. acute pain teams and patient-controlled analgesia, epidural analgesia. Poorly managed pain, especially acute pain, often leads to adverse physical and psychological outcomes including persistent pain and disability. A systems approach may improve the management of pain in hospitals. DESIGN A descriptive cross-sectional exploratory design. METHOD A large electronic pain score database of vital signs and pain scores was interrogated between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2010 to establish the proportion of hospital inpatient stays with clinically significant pain during the hospital stay and at discharge. FINDINGS A total of 810,774 pain scores were analysed, representing 38,451 patient stays. Clinically significant pain was present in 38·4% of patient stays. Across surgical categories, 54·0% of emergency admissions experienced clinically significant pain, compared with 48·0% of elective admissions. Medical areas had a summary figure of 26·5%. For 30% patients, clinically significant pain was followed by a consecutive clinically significant pain score. Only 0·2% of pain assessments were made independently of vital signs. CONCLUSION Reducing the risk of long-term persistent pain should be seen as integral to improving patient safety and can be achieved by harnessing organizational pain management processes with quality improvement initiatives. The assessment of pain alongside vital signs should be reviewed. Setting quality targets for pain are essential for improving the patient's experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eloise C J Carr
- Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Measuring team factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments. Implement Sci 2013; 8:20. [PMID: 23410500 PMCID: PMC3602018 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2012] [Accepted: 02/11/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measuring team factors in evaluations of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) may provide important information for enhancing CQI processes and outcomes; however, the large number of potentially relevant factors and associated measurement instruments makes inclusion of such measures challenging. This review aims to provide guidance on the selection of instruments for measuring team-level factors by systematically collating, categorizing, and reviewing quantitative self-report instruments. METHODS DATA SOURCES We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments; reference lists of systematic reviews; and citations and references of the main report of instruments. STUDY SELECTION To determine the scope of the review, we developed and used a conceptual framework designed to capture factors relevant to evaluating CQI in primary care (the InQuIRe framework). We included papers reporting development or use of an instrument measuring factors relevant to teamwork. Data extracted included instrument purpose; theoretical basis, constructs measured and definitions; development methods and assessment of measurement properties. Analysis and synthesis: We used qualitative analysis of instrument content and our initial framework to develop a taxonomy for summarizing and comparing instruments. Instrument content was categorized using the taxonomy, illustrating coverage of the InQuIRe framework. Methods of development and evidence of measurement properties were reviewed for instruments with potential for use in primary care. RESULTS We identified 192 potentially relevant instruments, 170 of which were analyzed to develop the taxonomy. Eighty-one instruments measured constructs relevant to CQI teams in primary care, with content covering teamwork context (45 instruments measured enabling conditions or attitudes to teamwork), team process (57 instruments measured teamwork behaviors), and team outcomes (59 instruments measured perceptions of the team or its effectiveness). Forty instruments were included for full review, many with a strong theoretical basis. Evidence supporting measurement properties was limited. CONCLUSIONS Existing instruments cover many of the factors hypothesized to contribute to QI success. With further testing, use of these instruments measuring team factors in evaluations could aid our understanding of the influence of teamwork on CQI outcomes. Greater consistency in the factors measured and choice of measurement instruments is required to enable synthesis of findings for informing policy and practice.
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Gomory T. The Limits of Evidence-Based Medicine and Its Application to Mental Health Evidence-Based Practice: Part One. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1891/1559-4343.15.1.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The present article outlines the major limitations of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and through a close review demonstrates that the three component EBM process model is a pseudoscientific tool. Its “objective” component is the collection, systematic analysis, and listing of “effective” treatments applying a research hierarchy from most rigorous (systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) to least rigorous (expert opinion). Its two subjective components are the clinical judgment of helping professionals about which “evidence-based” treatment to select and the specific and unique relevant personal preferences of the potential recipients regarding treatment. This procedural mishmash provides no more rigor in choosing “best practice” than has been provided by good clinical practitioners in the past because both turn out to be subjective and authority based. The article also discusses EBM’s further methodological dilution in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) endorsed Evidence-Based Mental Health Practice (EBP) movement. In EBP, the allegedly rigorous EBM protocol is altered. Instead of systematic expert protocol-driven EBM reviews of RCTs, NIMH sanctioned expert consensus panels decide “evidence-based practices.” This further problematizes the development of best practices in mental health by converting it to a political process. The article concludes with some observations on these issues. In a second article (part two) forthcoming, assertive community treatment (ACT) is examined as an example of an EBP that fails as a scientifically effective treatment despite its EBP certification and general popularity among practitioners.
Collapse
|
21
|
Santana MJ, Straus S, Gruen R, Stelfox HT. A qualitative study to identify opportunities for improving trauma quality improvement. J Crit Care 2012; 27:738.e1-7. [PMID: 22999480 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2012] [Revised: 06/01/2012] [Accepted: 07/07/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality improvement (QI) is a central tenant of trauma center accreditation in most countries, but its effectiveness is largely unknown. We sought to explore opportunities for improving trauma QI. METHODS We performed a qualitative research study using grounded theory analyses of interviews with medical directors and program managers from 75 verified trauma centers sampled from the United States (n = 51), Canada (n = 14), and Australasia (Australia and New Zealand [n = 10]) to explore experiences with trauma QI activities and identify opportunities for improvement. RESULTS Most trauma centers indicated that they perceived trauma QI to be important and devoted personnel for QI (data entry, data analyst, educator, nurse practitioner). Programs identified 5 principal opportunities to improve trauma QI: (1) ensure resource adequacy (human resources, registry maintenance, financial support, institutional support), (2) encourage stakeholder participation (engagement, communication, coordination), (3) ensure clinical relevance, (4) incorporate evidence-based tools, and (5) require provider and QI program accountability. CONCLUSIONS Quality improvement programs exist as accreditation requirements in most centers. However, trauma QI practices depend on a range of local and regional factors, and concrete opportunities for improvement that address impact and sustainability exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Jose Santana
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|