1
|
Jiao S, Zhao X, Yao S. Prediction of dose deposition matrix using voxel features driven machine learning approach. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220373. [PMID: 36856129 PMCID: PMC10161919 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A dose deposition matrix (DDM) prediction method using several voxel features and a machine learning (ML) approach is proposed for plan optimization in radiation therapy. METHODS Head and lung cases with the inhomogeneous medium are used as training and testing data. The prediction model is a cascade forward backprop neural network where the input is the features of the voxel, including 1) voxel to body surface distance along the beamlet axis, 2) voxel to beamlet axis distance, 3) voxel density, 4) heterogeneity corrected voxel to body surface distance, 5) heterogeneity corrected voxel to beamlet axis, and (6) the dose of voxel obtained from the pencil beam (PB) algorithm. The output is the predicted voxel dose corresponding to a beamlet. The predicted DDM was used for plan optimization (ML method) and compared with the dose of MC-based plan optimization (MC method) and the dose of pencil beam-based plan optimization (PB method). The mean absolute error (MAE) value was calculated for full volume relative to the dose of the MC method to evaluate the overall dose performance of the final plan. RESULTS For patient with head tumor, the ML method achieves MAE value 0.49 × 10-4 and PB has MAE 1.86 × 10-4. For patient with lung tumor, the ML method has MAE 1.42 × 10-4 and PB has MAE 3.72 × 10-4. The maximum percentage difference in PTV dose coverage (D98) between ML and MC methods is no more than 1.2% for patient with head tumor, while the difference is larger than 10% using the PB method. For patient with lung tumor, the maximum percentage difference in PTV dose coverage (D98) between ML and MC methods is no more than 2.1%, while the difference is larger than 16% using the PB method. CONCLUSIONS In this work, a reliable DDM prediction method is established for plan optimization by applying several voxel features and the ML approach. The results show that the ML method based on voxel features can obtain plans comparable to the MC method and is better than the PB method in achieving accurate dose to the patient, which is helpful for rapid plan optimization and accurate dose calculation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Establishment of a new machine learning method based on the relationship between the voxel and beamlet features for dose deposition matrix prediction in radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengxiu Jiao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaoqian Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Shuzhan Yao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Study of efficiency in five-field and field-by-field intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan using DOSXYZnrc Monte Carlo code. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:428-435. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
3
|
Yani S, Rizkia I, Kamirul, Rhani MF, Haekal M, Haryanto F. EGSnrc application for IMRT planning. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:217-226. [PMID: 32194347 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 11/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe a detailed instruction of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning simulation using BEAMnrc-DOSXYZnrc code system (EGSnrc package) and present a new graphical user interface based on MATLAB code (The MathWorks) to combine more than one. 3ddose file which were obtained from the IMRT plan. This study was performed in four phases: the commissioning of Varian Clinac iX6 MV, the simulation of IMRT planning in EGSnrc, the creation of in-house VDOSE GUI, and the analysis of the isodose contour and dose volume histogram (DVH) curve from several beam angles. The plan paramaters in sequence and control point files were extracted from the planning data in Tan Tock Seng Hospital Singapore (multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf positions - bank A and bank B, gantry angles, coordinate of isocenters, and MU indexes). VDOSE GUI which was created in this study can display the distribution dose curve in each slice and beam angle. Dose distributions from various MLC settings and beam angles yield different dose distributions even though they used the same number of simulated particles. This was due to the differences in the MLC leaf openings in every field. The value of the relative dose error between the two dose ditributions for "body" was 51.23 %. The Monte Carlo (MC) data was normalized with the maximum dose but the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) data was normalized by the dose in the isocenter. In this study, we have presented a Monte Carlo simulation framework for IMRT dose calculation using DOSXYZnrc source 21. Further studies are needed in conducting IMRT simulations using EGSnrc to minimize the different dose error and dose volume histogram deviation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sitti Yani
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB University), Jalan Meranti Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia.,Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Coblong, Bandung, West Java, 40132, Indonesia
| | - Ilmi Rizkia
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Coblong, Bandung, West Java, 40132, Indonesia
| | - Kamirul
- Indonesian National Institute of Aeronautics and Space, Jl. Goa Jepang, Sumberker, Samofa, Kabupaten Biak Numfor, Papua 98118, Indonesia
| | | | - Mohammad Haekal
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Coblong, Bandung, West Java, 40132, Indonesia
| | - Freddy Haryanto
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Coblong, Bandung, West Java, 40132, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Galpayage Dona KNU, Shang C, Leventouri T. Dosimetric Comparison of Treatment Plans Computed With Finite Size Pencil Beam and Monte Carlo Algorithms Using the InCise™ Multileaf Collimator-Equipped Cyberknife ® System. J Med Phys 2020; 45:7-15. [PMID: 32355430 PMCID: PMC7185708 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_64_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 11/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: InCise™ multileaf collimator (MLC) was introduced for CyberKnife® (CK) Robotic Radiosurgery System (CK-MLC) in 2015, and finite size pencil beam (FSPB) was the only available dose computation algorithm for treatment plans of CK-MLC system. The more advanced Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation algorithm of lnCise™ was initially released in 2017 for the CK Precision™ treatment planning system (TPS) (v1.1) with new graphic processing unit (GPU) platform. GPU based TPS of the CK offers more accurate, faster treatment planning time and intuitive user interface with smart three-dimensional editing tools and fully automated autosegmentation tools. The MC algorithm used in CK TPS simulates the energy deposited by each individual photon and secondary particles to calculate more accurate dose. In the present study, the dose disparities between MC and FSPB algorithms for selected Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) CK-MLC treatment plans are quantified. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 CK-MLC SABR plans computed with FSPB were retrospectively reviewed and compared with MC computed results, including plans for detached lung cancer (or tumors fully surrounded by lung tissues, n = 21), nondetached lung cancer (or tumor touched the chest wall or mediastinum, n = 23), intracranial (n = 21), and pancreas lesions (n = 15). Dosimetric parameters of each planning target volume and major organs at risk (OAR) are compared in terms of normalized percentage deviations (Ndev). Results: This study revealed an average of 24.4% overestimated D95 values in plans using FSPB over MC for detached lung (n = 21) and 14.9% for nondetached lung (n = 23) lesions. No significant dose differences are found in intracranial (0.3%, n = 21) and pancreatic (0.9%, n = 15) cases. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in Ndev of OARs. Conclusion: In this study, it was found that FSPB overestimates dose to inhomogeneous treatment sites. This indicates, the employment of MC algorithm in CK-MLC-based lung SABR treatment plans is strongly suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charles Shang
- Department of Physics, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.,South Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Delray Beach, Florida, USA
| | - Theodora Leventouri
- Department of Physics, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schreuder AN, Bridges DS, Rigsby L, Blakey M, Janson M, Hedrick SG, Wilkinson JB. Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using a realistic lung phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:127-137. [PMID: 31763759 PMCID: PMC6909115 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purposes are to compare the accuracy of RaySearch's analytical pencil beam (APB) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms for clinical proton therapy and to present clinical validation data using a novel animal tissue lung phantom. METHODS We constructed a realistic lung phantom composed of a rack of lamb resting on a stack of rectangular natural cork slabs simulating lung tissue. The tumor was simulated using 70% lean ground lamb meat inserted in a spherical hole with diameter 40 ± 5 mm carved into the cork slabs. A single-field plan using an anterior beam and a two-field plan using two anterior-oblique beams were delivered to the phantom. Ion chamber array measurements were taken medial and distal to the tumor. Measured doses were compared with calculated RayStation APB and MC calculated doses. RESULTS Our lung phantom enabled measurements with the MatriXX PT at multiple depths in the phantom. Using the MC calculations, the 3%/3 mm gamma index pass rates, comparing measured with calculated doses, for the distal planes were 74.5% and 85.3% for the APB and 99.1% and 92% for the MC algorithms. The measured data revealed up to 46% and 30% underdosing within the distal regions of the target volume for the single and the two field plans when APB calculations are used. These discrepancies reduced to less than 18% and 7% respectively using the MC calculations. CONCLUSIONS RaySearch Laboratories' Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm is superior to the pencil-beam algorithm for lung targets. Clinicians relying on the analytical pencil-beam algorithm should be aware of its pitfalls for this site and verify dose prior to delivery. We conclude that the RayStation MC algorithm is reliable and more accurate than the APB algorithm for lung targets and therefore should be used to plan proton therapy for patients with lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andries N. Schreuder
- Provision Center for Proton Therapy – Knoxville6450 Provision Cares WayKnoxvilleTN37909USA
| | - Daniel S. Bridges
- Provision Center for Proton Therapy – Knoxville6450 Provision Cares WayKnoxvilleTN37909USA
| | - Lauren Rigsby
- Provision Center for Proton Therapy – Knoxville6450 Provision Cares WayKnoxvilleTN37909USA
| | - Marc Blakey
- Provision Center for Proton Therapy – Knoxville6450 Provision Cares WayKnoxvilleTN37909USA
| | - Martin Janson
- RaySearch LaboratoriesSveavägen 44SE‐103 65StockholmSweden
| | - Samantha G. Hedrick
- Provision Center for Proton Therapy – Knoxville6450 Provision Cares WayKnoxvilleTN37909USA
| | - John B. Wilkinson
- Provision Center for Proton Therapy – Knoxville6450 Provision Cares WayKnoxvilleTN37909USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Freislederer P, von Münchow A, Kamp F, Heinz C, Gerum S, Corradini S, Söhn M, Reiner M, Roeder F, Floca R, Alber M, Belka C, Parodi K. Comparison of planned dose on different CT image sets to four-dimensional Monte Carlo dose recalculation using the patient's actual breathing trace for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. Med Phys 2019; 46:3268-3277. [PMID: 31074510 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The need for four-dimensional (4D) treatment planning becomes indispensable when it comes to radiation therapy for moving tumors in the thoracic and abdominal regions. The primary purpose of this study is to combine the actual breathing trace during each individual treatment fraction with the Linac's log file information and Monte Carlo 4D dose calculations. We investigated this workflow on multiple computed tomography (CT) datasets in a clinical environment for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning. METHODS We have developed a workflow, which allows us to recalculate absorbed dose to a 4DCT dataset using Monte Carlo calculation methods and accumulate all 4D doses in order to compare them to the planned dose using the Linac's log file, a 4DCT dataset, and the patient's actual breathing curve for each individual fraction. For five lung patients, three-dimensional-conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and volumetric modulated arc treatment (VMAT) treatment plans were generated on four different CT image datasets: a native free-breathing 3DCT, an average intensity projection (AIP) and a maximum intensity projection (MIP) CT both obtained from a 4DCT, and a 3DCT with density overrides based on the 3DCT (DO). The Monte Carlo 4D dose has been calculated on each 4DCT phase using the Linac's log file and the patient's breathing trace as a surrogate for tumor motion and dose was accumulated to the gross tumor volume (GTV) at the 50% breathing phase (end of exhale) using deformable image registration. RESULTS Δ D 98 % and Δ D 2 % between 4D dose and planned dose differed largely for 3DCT-based planning and also for DO in three patients. Least dose differences between planned and recalculated dose have been found for AIP and MIP treatment planning which both tend to be superior to DO, but the results indicate a dependency on the breathing variability, tumor motion, and size. An interplay effect has not been observed in the small patient cohort. CONCLUSIONS We have developed a workflow which, to our best knowledge, is the first incorporation of the patient breathing trace over the course of all individual treatment fractions with the Linac's log file information and 4D Monte Carlo recalculations of the actual treated dose. Due to the small patient cohort, no clear recommendation on which CT can be used for SBRT treatment planning can be given, but the developed workflow, after adaption for clinical use, could be used to enhance a priori 4D Monte Carlo treatment planning in the future and help with the decision on which CT dataset treatment planning should be carried out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Freislederer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Asmus von Münchow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Heinz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Söhn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Reiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria.,CCU Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ralf Floca
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Alber
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.,Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Experimental Physics - Medical Physics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liang X, Zheng D, Mamalui-Hunter M, Flampouri S, Hoppe BS, Mendenhall N, Li Z. ITV-Based Robust Optimization for VMAT Planning of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Lung Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2018; 9:38-48. [PMID: 30138747 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Using planning target volume (PTV) to account for setup uncertainties in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lung cancer has been questioned because a significant portion of the PTV contains low-density lung tissue. The purpose of this study is to (1) investigate the feasibility of using robust optimization to account for setup uncertainties in volumetric modulated arc therapy plan for lung SBRT and (2) evaluate the potential normal tissue-sparing benefit of a robust optimized plan compared with a conventional PTV-based optimized plan. METHODS AND MATERIALS The study was conducted with both phantom and patient cases. For each patient or phantom, 2 SBRT lung volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were generated, including an optimized plan based on the PTV (PTV-based plan) with a 5-mm internal target volume (ITV)-to-PTV margin and a second plan based on robust optimization of ITV (ITV-based plan) with ±5-mm setup uncertainties. The target coverage was evaluated on ITV D99 in 15 scenarios that simulated a 5-mm setup error. Dose-volume information on normal lung tissue, intermediate-to-high dose spillage, and integral dose was evaluated. RESULTS Compared with PTV-based plans, ITV-based robust optimized plans resulted in lower normal lung tissue dose, lower intermediate-to-high dose spillage to the body, and lower integral dose, while preserving the dose coverage under setup error scenarios for both phantom and patient cases. CONCLUSIONS Using ITV-based robust optimization, we have shown that accounting for setup uncertainty in SBRT planning is feasible. Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm the clinical effectiveness of this novel approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoying Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
| | - Dandan Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Nancy Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Zuofeng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liang X, Penagaricano J, Zheng D, Morrill S, Zhang X, Corry P, Griffin RJ, Han EY, Hardee M, Ratanatharathom V. Radiobiological impact of dose calculation algorithms on biologically optimized IMRT lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:10. [PMID: 26800883 PMCID: PMC4724090 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0578-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2015] [Accepted: 12/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study is to evaluate the radiobiological impact of Acuros XB (AXB) vs. Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm (AAA) dose calculation algorithms in combined dose-volume and biological optimized IMRT plans of SBRT treatments for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods Twenty eight patients with NSCLC previously treated SBRT were re-planned using Varian Eclipse (V11) with combined dose-volume and biological optimization IMRT sliding window technique. The total dose prescribed to the PTV was 60 Gy with 12 Gy per fraction. The plans were initially optimized using AAA algorithm, and then were recomputed using AXB using the same MUs and MLC files to compare with the dose distribution of the original plans and assess the radiobiological as well as dosimetric impact of the two different dose algorithms. The Poisson Linear-Quadatric (PLQ) and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) models were used for estimating the tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), respectively. The influence of the model parameter uncertainties on the TCP differences and the NTCP differences between AAA and AXB plans were studied by applying different sets of published model parameters. Patients were grouped into peripheral and centrally-located tumors to evaluate the impact of tumor location. Results PTV dose was lower in the re-calculated AXB plans, as compared to AAA plans. The median differences of PTV(D95%) were 1.7 Gy (range: 0.3, 6.5 Gy) and 1.0 Gy (range: 0.6, 4.4 Gy) for peripheral tumors and centrally-located tumors, respectively. The median differences of PTV(mean) were 0.4 Gy (range: 0.0, 1.9 Gy) and 0.9 Gy (range: 0.0, 4.3 Gy) for peripheral tumors and centrally-located tumors, respectively. TCP was also found lower in AXB-recalculated plans compared with the AAA plans. The median (range) of the TCP differences for 30 month local control were 1.6 % (0.3 %, 5.8 %) for peripheral tumors and 1.3 % (0.5 %, 3.4 %) for centrally located tumors. The lower TCP is associated with the lower PTV coverage in AXB-recalculated plans. No obvious trend was observed between the calculation-resulted TCP differences and tumor size or location. AAA and AXB yield very similar NTCP on lung pneumonitis according to the LKB model estimation in the present study. Conclusion AAA apparently overestimates the PTV dose; the magnitude of resulting difference in calculated TCP was up to 5.8 % in our study. AAA and AXB yield very similar NTCP on lung pneumonitis based on the LKB model parameter sets we used in the present study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., #771, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - J Penagaricano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., #771, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - D Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 42nd and Emile, Omaha, NE, USA.
| | - S Morrill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., #771, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - X Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., #771, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - P Corry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., #771, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - R J Griffin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., #771, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - E Y Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - M Hardee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., #771, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - V Ratanatharathom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., #771, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Troeller A, Garny S, Pachmann S, Kantz S, Gerum S, Manapov F, Ganswindt U, Belka C, Söhn M. Stereotactic radiotherapy of intrapulmonary lesions: comparison of different dose calculation algorithms for Oncentra MasterPlan®. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:51. [PMID: 25888786 PMCID: PMC4387737 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0354-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2014] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of high accuracy dose calculation algorithms, such as Monte Carlo (MC) and Collapsed Cone (CC) determine dose in inhomogeneous tissue more accurately than pencil beam (PB) algorithms. However, prescription protocols based on clinical experience with PB are often used for treatment plans calculated with CC. This may lead to treatment plans with changes in field size (FS) and changes in dose to organs at risk (OAR), especially for small tumor volumes in lung tissue treated with SABR. METHODS We re-evaluated 17 3D-conformal treatment plans for small intrapulmonary lesions with a prescription of 60 Gy in fractions of 7.5 Gy to the 80% isodose. All treatment plans were initially calculated in Oncentra MasterPlan® using a PB algorithm and recalculated with CC (CCre-calc). Furthermore, a CC-based plan with coverage similar to the PB plan (CCcov) and a CC plan with relaxed coverage criteria (CCclin), were created. The plans were analyzed in terms of Dmean, Dmin, Dmax and coverage for GTV, PTV and ITV. Changes in mean lung dose (MLD), V10Gy and V20Gy were evaluated for the lungs. The re-planned CC plans were compared to the original PB plans regarding changes in total monitor units (MU) and average FS. RESULTS When PB plans were recalculated with CC, the average V60Gy of GTV, ITV and PTV decreased by 13.2%, 19.9% and 41.4%, respectively. Average Dmean decreased by 9% (GTV), 11.6% (ITV) and 14.2% (PTV). Dmin decreased by 18.5% (GTV), 21.3% (ITV) and 17.5% (PTV). Dmax declined by 7.5%. PTV coverage correlated with PTV volume (p < 0.001). MLD, V10Gy, and V20Gy were significantly reduced in the CC plans. Both, CCcov and CCclin had significantly increased MUs and FS compared to PB. CONCLUSIONS Recalculation of PB plans for small lung lesions with CC showed a strong decline in dose and coverage in GTV, ITV and PTV, and declined dose in the lung. Thus, switching from a PB algorithm to CC, while aiming to obtain similar target coverage, can be associated with application of more MU and extension of radiotherapy fields, causing greater OAR exposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Almut Troeller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Sylvia Garny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Sophia Pachmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Steffi Kantz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Farkhad Manapov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Matthias Söhn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lacornerie T, Lisbona A, Mirabel X, Lartigau E, Reynaert N. GTV-based prescription in SBRT for lung lesions using advanced dose calculation algorithms. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:223. [PMID: 25319444 PMCID: PMC4205279 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-014-0223-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2014] [Accepted: 09/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of current study was to investigate the way dose is prescribed to lung lesions during SBRT using advanced dose calculation algorithms that take into account electron transport (type B algorithms). As type A algorithms do not take into account secondary electron transport, they overestimate the dose to lung lesions. Type B algorithms are more accurate but still no consensus is reached regarding dose prescription. The positive clinical results obtained using type A algorithms should be used as a starting point. Methods In current work a dose-calculation experiment is performed, presenting different prescription methods. Three cases with three different sizes of peripheral lung lesions were planned using three different treatment platforms. For each individual case 60 Gy to the PTV was prescribed using a type A algorithm and the dose distribution was recalculated using a type B algorithm in order to evaluate the impact of the secondary electron transport. Secondly, for each case a type B algorithm was used to prescribe 48 Gy to the PTV, and the resulting doses to the GTV were analyzed. Finally, prescriptions based on specific GTV dose volumes were evaluated. Results When using a type A algorithm to prescribe the same dose to the PTV, the differences regarding median GTV doses among platforms and cases were always less than 10% of the prescription dose. The prescription to the PTV based on type B algorithms, leads to a more important variability of the median GTV dose among cases and among platforms, (respectively 24%, and 28%). However, when 54 Gy was prescribed as median GTV dose, using a type B algorithm, the variability observed was minimal. Conclusion Normalizing the prescription dose to the median GTV dose for lung lesions avoids variability among different cases and treatment platforms of SBRT when type B algorithms are used to calculate the dose. The combination of using a type A algorithm to optimize a homogeneous dose in the PTV and using a type B algorithm to prescribe the median GTV dose provides a very robust method for treating lung lesions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-014-0223-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Albert Lisbona
- Service de Physique Médicale, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France.
| | - Xavier Mirabel
- Département Universitaire de Radiothérapie, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
| | - Eric Lartigau
- Département Universitaire de Radiothérapie, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
| | - Nick Reynaert
- Service de Physique Médicale, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Amankwaa-Frempong E, Vernimmen F, Blay S, Ezhilalan R. Irradiation of lung and esophagus tumors: A comparison of dose distributions calculated by anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm, a retrospective dosimetric study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER THERAPY AND ONCOLOGY 2014. [DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0202.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
12
|
Mönnich D, Lächelt S, Beyer T, Werner MK, Thorwarth D. Combined PET/CT for IMRT treatment planning of NSCLC: Contrast-enhanced CT images for Monte Carlo dose calculation. Phys Med 2013; 29:644-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2012] [Revised: 07/24/2012] [Accepted: 08/08/2012] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
|
13
|
Chan MKH, Kwong DLW, Ng SCY, Tong ASM, Tam EKW. Experimental evaluations of the accuracy of 3D and 4D planning in robotic tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers. Med Phys 2013; 40:041712. [PMID: 23556882 DOI: 10.1118/1.4794505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Due to the complexity of 4D target tracking radiotherapy, the accuracy of this treatment strategy should be experimentally validated against established standard 3D technique. This work compared the accuracy of 3D and 4D dose calculations in respiration tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS Using the 4D planning module of the CyberKnife treatment planning system, treatment plans for a moving target and a static off-target cord structure were created on different four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) datasets of a thorax phantom moving in different ranges. The 4D planning system used B-splines deformable image registrations (DIR) to accumulate dose distributions calculated on different breathing geometries, each corresponding to a static 3D-CT image of the 4D-CT dataset, onto a reference image to compose a 4D dose distribution. For each motion, 4D optimization was performed to generate a 4D treatment plan of the moving target. For comparison with standard 3D planning, each 4D plan was copied to the reference end-exhale images and a standard 3D dose calculation was followed. Treatment plans of the off-target structure were first obtained by standard 3D optimization on the end-exhale images. Subsequently, they were applied to recalculate the 4D dose distributions using DIRs. All dose distributions that were initially obtained using the ray-tracing algorithm with equivalent path-length heterogeneity correction (3D EPL and 4D EPL) were recalculated by a Monte Carlo algorithm (3D MC and 4D MC) to further investigate the effects of dose calculation algorithms. The calculated 3D EPL, 3D MC, 4D EPL, and 4D MC dose distributions were compared to measurements by Gafchromic EBT2 films in the axial and coronal planes of the moving target object, and the coronal plane for the static off-target object based on the γ metric at 5%/3mm criteria (γ5%/3mm). Treatment plans were considered acceptable if the percentage of pixels passing γ5%/3mm (Pγ<1) ≥ 90%. RESULTS The averaged Pγ<1 values of the 3D EPL, 3D MC, 4D EPL, and 4D MC dose calculation methods for the moving target plans are 95%, 95%, 94%, and 95% for reproducible motion, and 95%, 96%, 94%, and 93% for nonreproducible motion during actual treatment delivery. The overall measured target dose distributions are in better agreement with the 3DMC dose distributions than the 4DMC dose distributions. Conversely, measured dose distributions agree much better with the 4D EPL/MC than the 3D EPL/MC dose distributions in the static off-target structure, resulting in higher Pγ<1 values with 4D EPL/MC (91%) vs 3D EPL (24%) and 3D MC (25%). Systematic changes of target motion reduced the averaged Pγ<1 to 47% and 53% for 4D EPL and 4D MC dose calculations, and 22% for 3D EPL/MC dose calculations in the off-target films. CONCLUSIONS In robotic tracking SBRT, 4D treatment planning was found to yield better prediction of the dose distributions in the off-target structure, but not necessarily in the moving target, compared to standard 3D treatment planning, for reproducible and nonreproducible target motion. It is important to ensure on a patient-by-patient basis that the cumulative uncertainty associated with the 4D-CT artifacts, deformable image registration, and motion variability is significantly smaller than the cumulative uncertainty occurred in standard 3D planning in order to make 4D planning a justified option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark K H Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lächelt S, Alber M, Söhn M, Bamberg M, Steger V, Weinmann M. Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of medically inoperable patients with NSCLC stage I. Oncol Rep 2012; 28:1309-14. [PMID: 22895737 DOI: 10.3892/or.2012.1953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2012] [Accepted: 07/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The standard treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lobectomy. However, a considerable number of patients are not eligible for standard lung surgery due to poor pulmonary function or comorbidities. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy (IMSRT) with moderate hypofractionation for these patients. Twelve patients were selected for IMSRT. 4D-CT planning was performed by gating CT-scanning positioning. The applied doses ranged between 10x4.5 Gy (80% ID) (N=1), 12x4.5 Gy (95% ID) (N=1) and 10x5.5 Gy (95% ID) (N=10). Long-term follow-up was performed including spirometry and CT for evaluation of local, locoregional and distant control. Even in patients with poor pulmonary function IMRST was safe and well tolerated. No severe acute adverse effects were observed. Estimated local control at 2 years was 90%. Moreover, IMSRT does not induce a significant deterioration of pulmonary function. IMRST is safe and feasible even for patients with very poor pulmonary function. The applied dose provides a high local control rate, although the biological equivalent dose (BED) is lower compared to the average of other SRT regimens. Therefore, IMRST may be an efficient alternative for all NSCLC stage I patients with contraindications to standard lobectomy especially in patients with small tumors in high-risk localisations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Lächelt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Koeck J, Abo-Madyan Y, Eich HT, Stieler F, Fleckenstein J, Kriz J, Mueller RP, Wenz F, Lohr F. Clinical relevance of different dose calculation strategies for mediastinal IMRT in Hodgkin's disease. Strahlenther Onkol 2012; 188:653-9. [PMID: 22740169 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-012-0144-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2012] [Accepted: 04/23/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Conventional algorithms show uncertainties in dose calculation already for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) might even increase these. We wanted to assess differences in dose distribution for pencil beam (PB), collapsed cone (CC), and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm for both 3D-CRT and IMRT in patients with mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Based on 20 computed tomograph (CT) datasets of patients with mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma, we created treatment plans according to the guidelines of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) with PB and CC algorithm for 3D-CRT and with PB and MC algorithm for IMRT. Doses were compared for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk. RESULTS For 3D-CRT, PB overestimated PTV(95) and V(20) of the lung by 6.9% and 3.3% and underestimated V(10) of the lung by 5.8%, compared to the CC algorithm. For IMRT, PB overestimated PTV(95), V(20) of the lung, V(25) of the heart and V(10) of the female left/right breast by 8.1%, 25.8%, 14.0% and 43.6%/189.1%, and underestimated V(10) of the lung, V(4) of the heart and V(4) of the female left/right breast by 6.3%, 6.8% and 23.2%/15.6%, compared to MC. CONCLUSION The PB algorithm underestimates low doses to the organs at risk and overestimates dose to PTV and high doses to the organs at risk. For 3D-CRT, a well-modeled PB algorithm is clinically acceptable; for IMRT planning, however, an advanced algorithm such as CC or MC should be used at least for part of the plan optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Koeck
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135, Mannheim, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Seppala J, Suilamo S, Kulmala J, Mali P, Minn H. A dosimetric phantom study of dose accuracy and build-up effects using IMRT and RapidArc in stereotactic irradiation of lung tumours. Radiat Oncol 2012; 7:79. [PMID: 22647680 PMCID: PMC3403858 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-7-79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2012] [Accepted: 05/31/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Stereotactic lung radiotherapy (SLRT) has emerged as a curative treatment for medically inoperable patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc treatments (VMAT) have been proposed as the best practical approaches for the delivery of SLRT. However, a large number of narrow field shapes are needed in the dose delivery of intensity-modulated techniques and the probability of underdosing the tumour periphery increases as the effective field size is decreased. The purpose of this study was to evaluate small lung tumour doses irradiated by intensity-modulated techniques to understand the risk for dose calculation errors in precision radiotherapy such as SLRT. Materials and methods The study was executed with two heterogeneous phantoms with targets of Ø1.5 and Ø4.0 cm. Dose distributions in the simulated tumours delivered by small sliding window apertures (SWAs), IMRT and RapidArc treatment plans were measured with radiochromic film. Calculation algorithms of pencil beam convolution (PBC) and anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA) were used to calculate the corresponding dose distributions. Results Peripheral doses of the tumours were decreased as SWA decreased, which was not modelled by the calculation algorithms. The smallest SWA studied was 2 mm, which reduced the 90% isodose line width by 4.2 mm with the Ø4.0 cm tumour as compared to open field irradiation. PBC was not able to predict the dose accurately as the gamma evaluation failed to meet the criteria of ±3%/±1 mm on average in 61% of the defined volume with the smaller tumour. With AAA the corresponding value was 16%. The dosimetric inaccuracy of AAA was within ±3% with the optimized treatment plans of IMRT and RapidArc. The exception was the clinical RapidArc plan with dose overestimation of 4%. Conclusions Overall, the peripheral doses of the simulated lung tumours were decreased by decreasing the SWA. To achieve adequate surface dose coverage to small lung tumours with a difference less than 1 mm in the isodose line radius between the open and modulated field, a larger than 6 mm SWA should be used in the dose delivery of SLRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Seppala
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, POB 52, 20521 Turku, Finland.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nikolajek K, Kufeld M, Muacevic A, Wowra B, Niyazi M, Ganswindt U. Spinal radiosurgery--efficacy and safety after prior conventional radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2011; 6:173. [PMID: 22177519 PMCID: PMC3264666 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-6-173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2011] [Accepted: 12/16/2011] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Conventional external beam radiotherapy is a standard procedure for treatment of spinal metastases. In case of progression spinal cord tolerance limits further radiotherapy in pre-irradiated areas. Spinal stereotactic radiotherapy is a non-invasive option to re-treat pre-irradiated patients. Nevertheless, spinal radiosurgery results in relevant dose deposition within the myelon with potential toxicity. Aim of the study was to retrospectively analyse the efficacy and feasibility for salvage radiosurgery of spinal metastases. Methods During a period of 4 years (2005-2009) 70 lesions in 54 patients were treated in 60 radiosurgery sessions and retrospectively analysed. Clinical (pain, sensory and motor deficit) and radiological (CT/MRI) follow-up data were collected prospectively after radiosurgery. Pain - as main symptom - was classified by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. Every patient received single session radiosurgery after having been treated first-line with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Kaplan-Meier method and life tables were used to analyse freedom from local failure and overall survival. Results At a median follow-up of 14.5 months the actuarial rates of freedom from local failure at 6/12/18 months were 93%, 88% and 85%, respectively. The median radiosurgery dose was 1 × 18 Gy (range 10-28 Gy) to the median 70% isodose. The VAS score of patients with pain (median 6) dropped significantly (median 4, p = 0.002). In 6 out of 7 patients worse sensory or motor deficit after SRS was caused by local or distant failures (diagnosed by CT/MRI). One patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma developed a progressive complete paraparesis one year after the last treatment at lumbar level L3. Due to multiple surgery and radiosurgery treatments at the lumbar region and further local progression, the exact reason remained unclear. Apart from that, no CTC grade III or higher toxicity has been observed. Conclusions By applying spinal radiosurgery relevant radiation doses can be limited to small parts of the myelon. This prevents myelopathic side effects and makes it an effective and safe treatment option for well-suited patients. Especially for previously irradiated patients with local failure or pain salvage SRS represents a valuable treatment option with high local control rates, low toxicity and significant pain reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Nikolajek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr, 15, 81377 München, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Garny S, Rühm W, Zankl M, Wagner FM, Paretzke HG. First steps towards a fast-neutron therapy planning program. Radiat Oncol 2011; 6:163. [PMID: 22118299 PMCID: PMC3261826 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-6-163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2011] [Accepted: 11/25/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Monte Carlo code GEANT4 was used to implement first steps towards a treatment planning program for fast-neutron therapy at the FRM II research reactor in Garching, Germany. Depth dose curves were calculated inside a water phantom using measured primary neutron and simulated primary photon spectra and compared with depth dose curves measured earlier. The calculations were performed with GEANT4 in two different ways, simulating a simple box geometry and splitting this box into millions of small voxels (this was done to validate the voxelisation procedure that was also used to voxelise the human body). RESULTS In both cases, the dose distributions were very similar to those measured in the water phantom, up to a depth of 30 cm. In order to model the situation of patients treated at the FRM II MEDAPP therapy beamline for salivary gland tumors, a human voxel phantom was implemented in GEANT4 and irradiated with the implemented MEDAPP neutron and photon spectra. The 3D dose distribution calculated inside the head of the phantom was similar to the depth dose curves in the water phantom, with some differences that are explained by differences in elementary composition. The lateral dose distribution was studied at various depths. The calculated cumulative dose volume histograms for the voxel phantom show the exposure of organs at risk surrounding the tumor. CONCLUSIONS In order to minimize the dose to healthy tissue, a conformal treatment is necessary. This can only be accomplished with the help of an advanced treatment planning system like the one developed here. Although all calculations were done for absorbed dose only, any biological dose weighting can be implemented easily, to take into account the increased radiobiological effectiveness of neutrons compared to photons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Garny
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institut für Strahlenschutz, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Petoukhova AL, van Wingerden K, Wiggenraad RGJ, van de Vaart PJM, van Egmond J, Franken EM, van Santvoort JPC. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:4601-14. [PMID: 20668337 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/s13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
This study presents data for verification of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo (MC) dose algorithm (BrainLAB, Feldkirchen, Germany). MC calculations were compared with pencil beam (PB) calculations and verification measurements in phantoms with lung-equivalent material, air cavities or bone-equivalent material to mimic head and neck and thorax and in an Alderson anthropomorphic phantom. Dosimetric accuracy of MC for the micro-multileaf collimator (MLC) simulation was tested in a homogeneous phantom. All measurements were performed using an ionization chamber and Kodak EDR2 films with Novalis 6 MV photon beams. Dose distributions measured with film and calculated with MC in the homogeneous phantom are in excellent agreement for oval, C and squiggle-shaped fields and for a clinical IMRT plan. For a field with completely closed MLC, MC is much closer to the experimental result than the PB calculations. For fields larger than the dimensions of the inhomogeneities the MC calculations show excellent agreement (within 3%/1 mm) with the experimental data. MC calculations in the anthropomorphic phantom show good agreement with measurements for conformal beam plans and reasonable agreement for dynamic conformal arc and IMRT plans. For 6 head and neck and 15 lung patients a comparison of the MC plan with the PB plan was performed. Our results demonstrate that MC is able to accurately predict the dose in the presence of inhomogeneities typical for head and neck and thorax regions with reasonable calculation times (5-20 min). Lateral electron transport was well reproduced in MC calculations. We are planning to implement MC calculations for head and neck and lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Petoukhova
- Radiotherapy Centre West, PO Box 432, NL-2501 CK, The Hague, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|