Adjuvant therapy for T3N0 rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era- identification of the high risk patients

A Prognostic Nomogram for T3N0 Rectal Cancer After Total Mesorectal Excision to Help Select Patients for Adjuvant Therapy

Background

The recurrence rate of T3N0 rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision (TME) is relatively low, meaning that not all patients need adjuvant therapy (AT) (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy).

Methods

Patients diagnosed with pT3N0M0 rectal cancer after TME were analyzed using the SEER database, of which 4367 did not receive AT and 2794 received AT. Propensity score matching was used to balance the two groups in terms of confounding factors. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to screen independent prognostic factors, which were then used to establish a nomogram. The patients were then divided into three groups with X-tile software according to their risk scores. We enrolled 334 patients as external validation.

Results

The C-index of the model was 0.725 (95% confidence interval: 0.694–0.756). We divided the patients into three different risk layers based on the nomogram prediction scores, and found that AT did not improve the prognosis of low- and moderate-risk patients, while high-risk patients benefited from AT. External validation data also support the above conclusions.

Conclusion

This study developed a nomogram that effectively and comprehensively evaluates the prognosis of T3N0 rectal cancer patients after TME. After using the nomogram, we recommend AT for high-risk patients, but not for low- and moderate-risk patients.

Determining whether postoperative chemoradiotherapy is required in patients with pathologic T3N0 rectal cancer with negative resection margin

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify the risk factors for locoregional recurrence (LR) and determine possible candidates for postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in pathologic T3N0 (pT3N0) rectal cancer patients with a negative resection margin after total mesorectal excision (TME).

METHOD

Data from 365 patients who had pT3N0 rectal cancer between 2003 and 2012 in the Samsung Medical Center were reviewed. All patients underwent upfront surgery without preoperative treatment. Postoperative management involved either no adjuvant therapy (n = 122), chemotherapy alone (n = 100), or CCRT (n = 143).

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 71 months. The 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and LR-free survival (LRFS) rates were 95.9%, 86.9%, and 96.3%, respectively. When comparing the three groups (surgery alone [n = 122], chemotherapy alone [n = 100], and CCRT [n = 143]), there was no significant difference in LRFS among them (94.0%, 93.4%, and 99.2%, respectively; p = 0.20). However, when patients were stratified by risk factors (distance from anal verge ≤ 5 cm and distal resection margin [DRM] ≤ 2 cm), the 5-year LRFS improved by more than 10% by adding CCRT (98.9% with CCRT vs. 87.4% without CCRT, p = 0.006) in those with more than one risk factor. Postoperative CCRT did not affect the 5-year LRFS (100% with CCRT vs. 99.0% without CCRT, p = 0.66) in patients with no risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative CCRT significantly decreased LR in patients with pT3N0 rectal cancer with a negative resection margin but having a distance from the anal verge ≤ 5 cm or DRM ≤ 2 cm.

Risk factors for locoregional recurrence in patients with pathologic T3N0 rectal cancer with negative resection margin treated by surgery alone

Purpose

This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence (LRR) in pT3N0 rectal cancer patients who were treated with surgery alone and had negative resection margin including circumferential resection margin (CRM) for optimal indication of adjuvant radiotherapy.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed patients with pT3N0 rectal cancer who were treated via upfront surgery and had no other adjuvant treatment from January 2003 to December 2012. In total, 122 patients who had negative resection margin including negative CRM were included in the analysis.

Results

The median follow-up period after surgery was 60 months (range, 3 to 161 months). During this time, 6 patients (4.9%) experienced LRR at the anastomotic site (4 patients), and regional lymphatic area (2 patients). The estimated 5-year rates of overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and LRR-free survival were 96.7%, 84.6%, and 94.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that level of tumor ≤5 cm was a significant prognostic factor for LRR-free survival (LRRFS) (p = 0.04; hazard ratio = 7.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–47.30). Patients with level of tumor ≤5 cm had an estimated 5-year LRRFS of 66.8%, which was much higher than 2.3% in patients with level of tumor >5 cm. There was no significant factor for recurrence-free survival or overall survival.

Conclusion

In T3N0 rectal cancer, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be recommended in patients with level of tumor ≤5 cm for better local control. However, in patients with pT3N0 disease, negative resection margin, and level of tumor >5 cm, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be carefully suggested.

Adenoviral Vector-Mediated Delivery of p21WAF1/CIP1 Prevents Retinal Neovascularization in an Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy Model

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the inhibitory effect(s) of adenovirus (Ad) vector-mediated delivery of p21^WAF1/CIP1 (Ad-p21) on retinal neovascularization (RNV) in an animal model of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR).

METHODS

RNV was determined by examination of retinal fiat mounts and sections postnatal (P) day-17 (P17). Non-perfused retinal areas were analyzed using Image-Pro plus 6.0 software. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blot analysis were used to measure mRNA and protein expression of p21 and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 2.

RESULTS

Compared with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and Ad-NC group mice, non-perfused retinal areas, neovascularization, and number of endothelial cell nuclei breaking through the internal limiting membrane (ILM) in Ad-p21 group mice were significantly reduced. There were fewer non-perfused retinal areas in Ad-p21 mice than in either PBS or Ad-NC group mice, the differences being significant (F = 101.634; p < 0.05). Levels of p21 mRNA and protein in the Ad-p21 group had increased significantly compared with the other three groups (F = 839.664, 509.817; p < 0.05). Levels of CDK2 mRNA and protein in the Ad-p21 group decreased significantly (F = 301.858, 592.882; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ad-p21 inhibits RNV in OIR. A potential underlying mechanism for this may be that overexpression of p21 arrests the cell cycle at the G1- to S-phase transition via inhibition of CDK2 activity.

Prognostic Significance of Microvessel Density Determining by Endoglin in Stage II Rectal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis

Background. The role of endoglin in the Dukes B rectal cancer is still unexplored. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of endoglin (CD105) in resected rectal cancer and to evaluate the relationship between microvessels density (MVD), clinicopathological factors, and survival rates. Methods. The study included 95 primary rectal adenocarcinomas, corresponding to 67 adjacent and 73 distant normal mucosa specimens from surgical resection samples. Tumor specimens were paraffin-embedded and immunohistochemical staining for the CD105 endothelial antigen was performed to count CD105-MVD. For exact measurement of the CD105-MVD used a computer-integrated system Alphelys Spot Browser 2 was used. Results. The intratumoral CD105-MVD was significantly higher compared with corresponding adjacent mucosa (P < 0.0001) and distant mucosa specimens (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the CD105-MVD according to patients age, gender, tumor location, grade of differentiation, histological type, depth of tumor invasion, and tumor size. The overall survival rate was significantly higher in the low CD105-MVD group of patients than in the high CD105-MVD group of patients (log-rank test, P = 0.0406). Conclusion. CD105-assessed MVD could help to identify patients with possibility of poor survival in the group of stage II RC.

Patterns of Pelvic Radiotherapy in Patients with Stage II/III Rectal Cancer

High-level evidence supports adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer. We examined the influence of sociodemographic factors on patterns of adjuvant radiotherapy for resected Stage II/III rectal cancer. Methods. Patients undergoing surgical resection for stage II/III rectal cancer were identified in SEER registry. Results. A total of 21,683 patients were identified. Majority of patients were male (58.8%), white (83%), and with stage III (54.9%) and received radiotherapy (66%). On univariate analysis, male gender, stage III, younger age, year of diagnosis, and higher socioeconomic status (SES) were associated with radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered in 84.4% of patients <50; however, only 32.8% of those are >80 years. Logistic regression demonstrated a significant increase in the use of radiotherapy in younger patients who are <50 (OR, 10.3), with stage III (OR, 1.21), males (OR, 1.18), and with higher SES. Conclusions. There is a failure to conform to standard adjuvant radiotherapy in one-third of patients, and this is associated with older age, stage II, area-level of socioeconomic deprivation, and female sex.

Outcomes of unselected patients with pathologic T3N0 rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study compares the outcomes of patients with pathological (p) T3N0 rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (S), surgery and radiation (SR) or surgery, radiation and chemotherapy (SRC), in a population based setting.

MATERIALS

Three hundred and seven patients with operable, macroscopically resected pT3N0 rectal cancer referred to the BC Cancer Agency between 2000 and 2004 were segregated by treatment type: S (n=65), SR (n=97) and SRC (n=145). Patient characteristics, 5-year locoregional recurrence (LRR) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between treatment cohorts.

RESULTS

Median age differed significantly between S, SR and SRC patient cohorts: 76, 72 and 64 years respectively. Five-year LRR differed by treatment group, with 29% for S, 6.3% for SR and 3.84% for SRC patients. DSS was superior in SRC compared to S patients (hazard ratio=0.31 [0.17, 0.60]). Co-morbidities and patient preference were most common reasons for omission of radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Unselected patients with pT3N0 rectal cancer not treated with peri-operative radiation experience a high rate of LRR and reduced DSS in comparison to patients treated with bimodality and trimodality therapies. Advanced age is significantly associated with omission of therapy in patients with early stage rectal cancer.

Lack of CD44 variant 6 expression in rectal cancer invasive front associates with early recurrence

AIM: To investigate the prognostic value of CD44 variant 6 (CD44v6), a membranous adhesion molecule, in rectal cancer.

METHODS: Altogether, 210 rectal cancer samples from 214 patients treated with short-course radiotherapy (RT, n = 90), long-course (chemo) RT (n = 53) or surgery alone (n = 71) were studied with immunohistochemistry for CD44v6. The extent and intensity of membranous and cytoplasmic CD44v6 staining, and the intratumoral membranous staining pattern, were analyzed.

RESULTS: Membranous CD44v6 expression was seen in 84% and cytoplasmic expression in 81% of the cases. In 59% of the tumors with membranous CD44v6 expression, the staining pattern in the invasive front was determined as “front-positive” and in 41% as “front-negative”. The latter pattern was associated with narrower circumferential margin (P = 0.01), infiltrative growth pattern (P < 0.001), and shorter disease-free survival in univariate survival analysis (P = 0.022) when compared to the “front-positive” tumors.

CONCLUSION: The lack of membranous CD44v6 in the rectal cancer invasive front could be used as a method to identify patients at increased risk for recurrent disease.

Neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: actual status

Neoadjuvant (preoperative) concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has become a standard treatment of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas. The clinical stages II (cT3-4, N0, M0) and III (cT1-4, N+, M0) according to International Union Against Cancer (IUCC) are concerned. It can reduce tumor volume and subsequently lead to an increase in complete resections (R0 resections), shows less toxicity, and improves local control rate. The aim of this review is to summarize actual approaches, main problems, and discrepancies in the treatment of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas.