1
|
Hizam DA, Tan LK, Saad M, Muaadz A, Ung NM. Comparison of commercial atlas-based automatic segmentation software for prostate radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Eng Sci Med 2024:10.1007/s13246-024-01411-2. [PMID: 38647633 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-024-01411-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
This study aims to assess the accuracy of automatic atlas-based contours for various key anatomical structures in prostate radiotherapy treatment planning. The evaluated structures include the bladder, rectum, prostate, seminal vesicles, femoral heads and penile bulb. CT images from 20 patients who underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy were randomly chosen to create an atlas library. Atlas contours of the seven anatomical structures were generated using four software packages: ABAS, Eclipse, MIM, and RayStation. These contours were then compared to manual delineations performed by oncologists, which served as the ground truth. Evaluation metrics such as dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA), and volume ratio (VR) were calculated to assess the accuracy of the contours. Additionally, the time taken by each software to generate the atlas contour was recorded. The mean DSC values for the bladder exhibited strong agreement (>0.8) with manual delineations for all software except for Eclipse and RayStation. Similarly, the femoral heads showed significant similarity between the atlas contours and ground truth across all software, with mean DSC values exceeding 0.9 and MDA values close to zero. On the other hand, the penile bulb displayed only moderate agreement with the ground truth, with mean DSC values ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 for all software. A similar trend was observed in the prostate atlas contours, except for MIM, which achieved a mean DSC of over 0.8. For the rectum, both ABAS and MIM atlases demonstrated strong agreement with the ground truth, resulting in mean DSC values of more than 0.8. Overall, MIM and ABAS outperformed Eclipse and RayStation in both DSC and MDA. These results indicate that the atlas-based segmentation employed in this study produces acceptable contours for the anatomical structures of interest in prostate radiotherapy treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diyana Afrina Hizam
- Clinical Oncology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Li Kuo Tan
- Department of Biomedical Imaging, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| | - Marniza Saad
- Clinical Oncology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Asyraf Muaadz
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ngie Min Ung
- Clinical Oncology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Molière S, Hamzaoui D, Granger B, Montagne S, Allera A, Ezziane M, Luzurier A, Quint R, Kalai M, Ayache N, Delingette H, Renard-Penna R. Reference standard for the evaluation of automatic segmentation algorithms: Quantification of inter observer variability of manual delineation of prostate contour on MRI. Diagn Interv Imaging 2024; 105:65-73. [PMID: 37822196 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between inter-reader variability in manual prostate contour segmentation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations and determine the optimal number of readers required to establish a reliable reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seven radiologists with various experiences independently performed manual segmentation of the prostate contour (whole-gland [WG] and transition zone [TZ]) on 40 prostate MRI examinations obtained in 40 patients. Inter-reader variability in prostate contour delineations was estimated using standard metrics (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], Hausdorff distance and volume-based metrics). The impact of the number of readers (from two to seven) on segmentation variability was assessed using pairwise metrics (consistency) and metrics with respect to a reference segmentation (conformity), obtained either with majority voting or simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm. RESULTS The average segmentation DSC for two readers in pairwise comparison was 0.919 for WG and 0.876 for TZ. Variability decreased with the number of readers: the interquartile ranges of the DSC were 0.076 (WG) / 0.021 (TZ) for configurations with two readers, 0.005 (WG) / 0.012 (TZ) for configurations with three readers, and 0.002 (WG) / 0.0037 (TZ) for configurations with six readers. The interquartile range decreased slightly faster between two and three readers than between three and six readers. When using consensus methods, variability often reached its minimum with three readers (with STAPLE, DSC = 0.96 [range: 0.945-0.971] for WG and DSC = 0.94 [range: 0.912-0.957] for TZ, and interquartile range was minimal for configurations with three readers. CONCLUSION The number of readers affects the inter-reader variability, in terms of inter-reader consistency and conformity to a reference. Variability is minimal for three readers, or three readers represent a tipping point in the variability evolution, with both pairwise-based metrics or metrics with respect to a reference. Accordingly, three readers may represent an optimal number to determine references for artificial intelligence applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Molière
- Department of Radiology, Hôpitaux Universitaire de Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre, 67200, Strasbourg, France; Breast and Thyroid Imaging Unit, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 67200, Strasbourg, France; IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, 67400, Illkirch, France.
| | - Dimitri Hamzaoui
- Inria, Epione Team, Sophia Antipolis, Université Côte d'Azur, 06902, Nice, France
| | - Benjamin Granger
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Sarah Montagne
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75020, Paris, France; Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75013, Paris, France; GRC N° 5, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Allera
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Malek Ezziane
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Anna Luzurier
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Raphaelle Quint
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Mehdi Kalai
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Nicholas Ayache
- Department of Radiology, Hôpitaux Universitaire de Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre, 67200, Strasbourg, France
| | - Hervé Delingette
- Department of Radiology, Hôpitaux Universitaire de Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre, 67200, Strasbourg, France
| | - Raphaële Renard-Penna
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75020, Paris, France; Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75013, Paris, France; GRC N° 5, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lei Y, Wang T, Tian S, Fu Y, Patel P, Jani AB, Curran WJ, Liu T, Yang X. Male pelvic CT multi-organ segmentation using synthetic MRI-aided dual pyramid networks. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33780918 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abf2f9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The delineation of the prostate and organs-at-risk (OARs) is fundamental to prostate radiation treatment planning, but is currently labor-intensive and observer-dependent. We aimed to develop an automated computed tomography (CT)-based multi-organ (bladder, prostate, rectum, left and right femoral heads (RFHs)) segmentation method for prostate radiation therapy treatment planning. The proposed method uses synthetic MRIs (sMRIs) to offer superior soft-tissue information for male pelvic CT images. Cycle-consistent adversarial networks (CycleGAN) were used to generate CT-based sMRIs. Dual pyramid networks (DPNs) extracted features from both CTs and sMRIs. A deep attention strategy was integrated into the DPNs to select the most relevant features from both CTs and sMRIs to identify organ boundaries. The CT-based sMRI generated from our previously trained CycleGAN and its corresponding CT images were inputted to the proposed DPNs to provide complementary information for pelvic multi-organ segmentation. The proposed method was trained and evaluated using datasets from 140 patients with prostate cancer, and were then compared against state-of-art methods. The Dice similarity coefficients and mean surface distances between our results and ground truth were 0.95 ± 0.05, 1.16 ± 0.70 mm; 0.88 ± 0.08, 1.64 ± 1.26 mm; 0.90 ± 0.04, 1.27 ± 0.48 mm; 0.95 ± 0.04, 1.08 ± 1.29 mm; and 0.95 ± 0.04, 1.11 ± 1.49 mm for bladder, prostate, rectum, left and RFHs, respectively. Mean center of mass distances was within 3 mm for all organs. Our results performed significantly better than those of competing methods in most evaluation metrics. We demonstrated the feasibility of sMRI-aided DPNs for multi-organ segmentation on pelvic CT images, and its superiority over other networks. The proposed method could be used in routine prostate cancer radiotherapy treatment planning to rapidly segment the prostate and standard OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Tonghe Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Sibo Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Yabo Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Pretesh Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Ashesh B Jani
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Casati M, Piffer S, Calusi S, Marrazzo L, Simontacchi G, Di Cataldo V, Greto D, Desideri I, Vernaleone M, Francolini G, Livi L, Pallotta S. Methodological approach to create an atlas using a commercial auto-contouring software. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:219-230. [PMID: 33236827 PMCID: PMC7769405 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this work was to establish a methodological approach for creation and optimization of an atlas for auto-contouring, using the commercial software MIM MAESTRO (MIM Software Inc. Cleveland OH). METHODS A computed tomography (CT) male pelvis atlas was created and optimized to evaluate how different tools and options impact on the accuracy of automatic segmentation. Pelvic lymph nodes (PLN), rectum, bladder, and femurs of 55 subjects were reviewed for consistency by a senior consultant radiation oncologist with 15 yr of experience. Several atlas and workflow options were tuned to optimize the accuracy of auto-contours. The deformable image registration (DIR), the finalization method, the k number of atlas best matching subjects, and several post-processing options were studied. To test our atlas performances, automatic and reference manual contours of 20 test subjects were statistically compared based on dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) indices. The effect of field of view (FOV) reduction on auto-contouring time was also investigated. RESULTS With the optimized atlas and workflow, DSC and MDA median values of bladder, rectum, PLN, and femurs were 0.91 and 1.6 mm, 0.85 and 1.6 mm, 0.85 and 1.8 mm, and 0.96 and 0.5 mm, respectively. Auto-contouring time was more than halved by strictly cropping the FOV of the subject to be contoured to the pelvic region. CONCLUSION A statistically significant improvement of auto-contours accuracy was obtained using our atlas and optimized workflow instead of the MIM Software pelvic atlas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Casati
- Department of Medical Physics, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Piffer
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Florence, Italy
| | - Silvia Calusi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Livia Marrazzo
- Department of Medical Physics, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Daniela Greto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Vernaleone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefania Pallotta
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kiljunen T, Akram S, Niemelä J, Löyttyniemi E, Seppälä J, Heikkilä J, Vuolukka K, Kääriäinen OS, Heikkilä VP, Lehtiö K, Nikkinen J, Gershkevitsh E, Borkvel A, Adamson M, Zolotuhhin D, Kolk K, Pang EPP, Tuan JKL, Master Z, Chua MLK, Joensuu T, Kononen J, Myllykangas M, Riener M, Mokka M, Keyriläinen J. A Deep Learning-Based Automated CT Segmentation of Prostate Cancer Anatomy for Radiation Therapy Planning-A Retrospective Multicenter Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:E959. [PMID: 33212793 PMCID: PMC7697786 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10110959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
A commercial deep learning (DL)-based automated segmentation tool (AST) for computed tomography (CT) is evaluated for accuracy and efficiency gain within prostate cancer patients. Thirty patients from six clinics were reviewed with manual- (MC), automated- (AC) and automated and edited (AEC) contouring methods. In the AEC group, created contours (prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, rectum, femoral heads and penile bulb) were edited, whereas the MC group included empty datasets for MC. In one clinic, lymph node CTV delineations were evaluated for interobserver variability. Compared to MC, the mean time saved using the AST was 12 min for the whole data set (46%) and 12 min for the lymph node CTV (60%), respectively. The delineation consistency between MC and AEC groups according to the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) improved from 0.78 to 0.94 for the whole data set and from 0.76 to 0.91 for the lymph nodes. The mean DSCs between MC and AC for all six clinics were 0.82 for prostate, 0.72 for seminal vesicles, 0.93 for bladder, 0.84 for rectum, 0.69 for femoral heads and 0.51 for penile bulb. This study proves that using a general DL-based AST for CT images saves time and improves consistency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo Kiljunen
- Docrates Cancer Center, Saukonpaadenranta 2, FI-00180 Helsinki, Finland; (T.J.); (J.K.); (M.M.); (M.R.)
| | - Saad Akram
- MVision Ai, c/o Terkko Health hub, Haartmaninkatu 4, FI-00290 Helsinki, Finland; (S.A.); (J.N.)
| | - Jarkko Niemelä
- MVision Ai, c/o Terkko Health hub, Haartmaninkatu 4, FI-00290 Helsinki, Finland; (S.A.); (J.N.)
| | - Eliisa Löyttyniemi
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20014 Turku, Finland;
| | - Jan Seppälä
- Kuopio University Hospital, Center of Oncology, Kelkkailijantie 7, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland; (J.S.); (J.H.); (K.V.); (O.-S.K.)
| | - Janne Heikkilä
- Kuopio University Hospital, Center of Oncology, Kelkkailijantie 7, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland; (J.S.); (J.H.); (K.V.); (O.-S.K.)
| | - Kristiina Vuolukka
- Kuopio University Hospital, Center of Oncology, Kelkkailijantie 7, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland; (J.S.); (J.H.); (K.V.); (O.-S.K.)
| | - Okko-Sakari Kääriäinen
- Kuopio University Hospital, Center of Oncology, Kelkkailijantie 7, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland; (J.S.); (J.H.); (K.V.); (O.-S.K.)
| | - Vesa-Pekka Heikkilä
- Oulu University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Kajaanintie 50, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland; (V.-P.H.); (K.L.); (J.N.)
- University of Oulu, Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Aapistie 5 A, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland
| | - Kaisa Lehtiö
- Oulu University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Kajaanintie 50, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland; (V.-P.H.); (K.L.); (J.N.)
| | - Juha Nikkinen
- Oulu University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Kajaanintie 50, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland; (V.-P.H.); (K.L.); (J.N.)
- University of Oulu, Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Aapistie 5 A, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland
| | - Eduard Gershkevitsh
- North Estonia Medical Centre, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419 Tallinn, Estonia; (E.G.); (A.B.); (M.A.); (D.Z.); (K.K.)
| | - Anni Borkvel
- North Estonia Medical Centre, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419 Tallinn, Estonia; (E.G.); (A.B.); (M.A.); (D.Z.); (K.K.)
| | - Merve Adamson
- North Estonia Medical Centre, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419 Tallinn, Estonia; (E.G.); (A.B.); (M.A.); (D.Z.); (K.K.)
| | - Daniil Zolotuhhin
- North Estonia Medical Centre, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419 Tallinn, Estonia; (E.G.); (A.B.); (M.A.); (D.Z.); (K.K.)
| | - Kati Kolk
- North Estonia Medical Centre, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419 Tallinn, Estonia; (E.G.); (A.B.); (M.A.); (D.Z.); (K.K.)
| | - Eric Pei Ping Pang
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Radiation Oncology, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (E.P.P.P); (J.K.L.T); (Z.M.); (M.L.K.C)
| | - Jeffrey Kit Loong Tuan
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Radiation Oncology, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (E.P.P.P); (J.K.L.T); (Z.M.); (M.L.K.C)
- Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| | - Zubin Master
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Radiation Oncology, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (E.P.P.P); (J.K.L.T); (Z.M.); (M.L.K.C)
| | - Melvin Lee Kiang Chua
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Radiation Oncology, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (E.P.P.P); (J.K.L.T); (Z.M.); (M.L.K.C)
- Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Medical Sciences, Singapore 169610, Singapore
| | - Timo Joensuu
- Docrates Cancer Center, Saukonpaadenranta 2, FI-00180 Helsinki, Finland; (T.J.); (J.K.); (M.M.); (M.R.)
| | - Juha Kononen
- Docrates Cancer Center, Saukonpaadenranta 2, FI-00180 Helsinki, Finland; (T.J.); (J.K.); (M.M.); (M.R.)
| | - Mikko Myllykangas
- Docrates Cancer Center, Saukonpaadenranta 2, FI-00180 Helsinki, Finland; (T.J.); (J.K.); (M.M.); (M.R.)
| | - Maigo Riener
- Docrates Cancer Center, Saukonpaadenranta 2, FI-00180 Helsinki, Finland; (T.J.); (J.K.); (M.M.); (M.R.)
| | - Miia Mokka
- Turku University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Hämeentie 11, FI-20521 Turku, Finland; (M.M.); (J.K.)
| | - Jani Keyriläinen
- Turku University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Hämeentie 11, FI-20521 Turku, Finland; (M.M.); (J.K.)
- Turku University Hospital, Department of Medical Physics, Hämeentie 11, FI-20521 Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zabel WJ, Conway JL, Gladwish A, Skliarenko J, Didiodato G, Goorts-Matthews L, Michalak A, Reistetter S, King J, Nakonechny K, Malkoske K, Tran MN, McVicar N. Clinical Evaluation of Deep Learning and Atlas-Based Auto-Contouring of Bladder and Rectum for Prostate Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 11:e80-e89. [PMID: 32599279 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Auto-contouring may reduce workload, interobserver variation, and time associated with manual contouring of organs at risk. Manual contouring remains the standard due in part to uncertainty around the time and workload savings after accounting for the review and editing of auto-contours. This preliminary study compares a standard manual contouring workflow with 2 auto-contouring workflows (atlas and deep learning) for contouring the bladder and rectum in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Three contouring workflows were defined based on the initial contour-generation method including manual (MAN), atlas-based auto-contour (ATLAS), and deep-learning auto-contour (DEEP). For each workflow, initial contour generation was retrospectively performed on 15 patients with prostate cancer. Then, radiation oncologists (ROs) edited each contour while blinded to the manner in which the initial contour was generated. Workflows were compared by time (both in initial contour generation and in RO editing), contour similarity, and dosimetric evaluation. RESULTS Mean durations for initial contour generation were 10.9 min, 1.4 min, and 1.2 min for MAN, DEEP, and ATLAS, respectively. Initial DEEP contours were more geometrically similar to initial MAN contours. Mean durations of the RO editing steps for MAN, DEEP, and ATLAS contours were 4.1 min, 4.7 min, and 10.2 min, respectively. The geometric extent of RO edits was consistently larger for ATLAS contours compared with MAN and DEEP. No differences in clinically relevant dose-volume metrics were observed between workflows. CONCLUSION Auto-contouring software affords time savings for initial contour generation; however, it is important to also quantify workload changes at the RO editing step. Using deep-learning auto-contouring for bladder and rectum contour generation reduced contouring time without negatively affecting RO editing times, contour geometry, or clinically relevant dose-volume metrics. This work contributes to growing evidence that deep-learning methods are a clinically viable solution for organ-at-risk contouring in radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Jeffrey Zabel
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica L Conway
- Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adam Gladwish
- Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Skliarenko
- Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Adam Michalak
- Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jenna King
- Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kyle Malkoske
- Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
| | - Muoi N Tran
- Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nevin McVicar
- Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dong X, Lei Y, Tian S, Wang T, Patel P, Curran WJ, Jani AB, Liu T, Yang X. Synthetic MRI-aided multi-organ segmentation on male pelvic CT using cycle consistent deep attention network. Radiother Oncol 2019; 141:192-199. [PMID: 31630868 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Manual contouring is labor intensive, and subject to variations in operator knowledge, experience and technique. This work aims to develop an automated computed tomography (CT) multi-organ segmentation method for prostate cancer treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS The proposed method exploits the superior soft-tissue information provided by synthetic MRI (sMRI) to aid the multi-organ segmentation on pelvic CT images. A cycle generative adversarial network (CycleGAN) was used to estimate sMRIs from CT images. A deep attention U-Net (DAUnet) was trained on sMRI and corresponding multi-organ contours for auto-segmentation. The deep attention strategy was introduced to identify the most relevant features to differentiate different organs. Deep supervision was incorporated into the DAUnet to enhance the features' discriminative ability. Segmented contours of a patient were obtained by feeding CT image into the trained CycleGAN to generate sMRI, which was then fed to the trained DAUnet to generate organ contours. We trained and evaluated our model with 140 datasets from prostate patients. RESULTS The Dice similarity coefficient and mean surface distance between our segmented and bladder, prostate, and rectum manual contours were 0.95 ± 0.03, 0.52 ± 0.22 mm; 0.87 ± 0.04, 0.93 ± 0.51 mm; and 0.89 ± 0.04, 0.92 ± 1.03 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION We proposed a sMRI-aided multi-organ automatic segmentation method on pelvic CT images. By integrating deep attention and deep supervision strategy, the proposed network provides accurate and consistent prostate, bladder and rectum segmentation, and has the potential to facilitate routine prostate-cancer radiotherapy treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, United States
| | - Yang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, United States
| | - Sibo Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, United States
| | - Tonghe Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, United States
| | - Pretesh Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, United States
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, United States
| | - Ashesh B Jani
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, United States
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, United States
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shelley LEA, Sutcliffe MPF, Harrison K, Scaife JE, Parker MA, Romanchikova M, Thomas SJ, Jena R, Burnet NG. Autosegmentation of the rectum on megavoltage image guidance scans. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2019; 5:025006. [PMID: 31057946 PMCID: PMC6466640 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aaf1db] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Autosegmentation of image guidance (IG) scans is crucial for streamlining and optimising delivered dose calculation in radiotherapy. By accounting for interfraction motion, daily delivered dose can be accumulated and incorporated into automated systems for adaptive radiotherapy. Autosegmentation of IG scans is challenging due to poorer image quality than typical planning kilovoltage computed tomography (kVCT) systems, and the resulting reduction of soft tissue contrast in regions such as the pelvis makes organ boundaries less distinguishable. Current autosegmentation solutions generally involve propagation of planning contours to the IG scan by deformable image registration (DIR). Here, we present a novel approach for primary autosegmentation of the rectum on megavoltage IG scans acquired during prostate radiotherapy, based on the Chan-Vese algorithm. Pre-processing steps such as Hounsfield unit/intensity scaling, identifying search regions, dealing with air, and handling the prostate, are detailed. Post-processing features include identification of implausible contours (nominally those affected by muscle or air), 3D self-checking, smoothing, and interpolation. In cases where the algorithm struggles, the best estimate on a given slice may revert to the propagated kVCT rectal contour. Algorithm parameters were optimised systematically for a training cohort of 26 scans, and tested on a validation cohort of 30 scans, from 10 patients. Manual intervention was not required. Comparing Chan-Vese autocontours with contours manually segmented by an experienced clinical oncologist achieved a mean Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.78 (SE < 0.011). This was comparable with DIR methods for kVCT and CBCT published in the literature. The autosegmentation system was developed within the VoxTox Research Programme for accumulation of delivered dose to the rectum in prostate radiotherapy, but may have applicability to further anatomical sites and imaging modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L E A Shelley
- University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M P F Sutcliffe
- University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - K Harrison
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- University of Cambridge, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - J E Scaife
- Gloucestershire Oncology Centre, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, United Kingdom
| | - M A Parker
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- University of Cambridge, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M Romanchikova
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom
| | - S J Thomas
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - R Jena
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Oncology Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - N G Burnet
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moulton CR, House MJ, Lye V, Tang CI, Krawiec M, Joseph DJ, Denham JW, Ebert MA. Accumulation of rectum dose-volume metrics for prostate external beam radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy: Evaluating deformably registered dose distribution addition using parameter-based addition. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2017; 61:534-542. [PMID: 28185419 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2016] [Accepted: 12/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To investigate the accuracy of deriving dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters from deformably registered data by comparing values with the simple addition of DVHs from each phase of a combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)/high-dose-rate (HDR-BT) brachytherapy prostate treatment. METHODS Eighty-two patients received EBRT in 23 fractions of 2 Gy and HDR-BT TG43 in three fractions of 6.5 Gy. The HDR-BT CT was deformably registered to the EBRT CT. The rectum D0.1cc , D1cc , D2cc and D10cc were calculated in two ways. (i) Parameter-adding: the EBRT DVH parameters (or the EBRT prescription dose) were added to the unregistered HDR-BT DVH parameters. (ii) Distribution-adding: the parameters were extracted after the EBRT doses were 3D-summed with the registered HDR-BT doses. Resulting differences between the parameters were investigated. RESULTS The D0.1cc , D1cc and D2cc from parameter-adding were 21.3% (P < 0.001), 6.3% (P < 0.001) and 3.5% (P < 0.001) smaller than those from distribution-adding. The D10cc was 2.2% (P = 0.015) larger for distribution-adding. CONCLUSION Distribution-adding was confounded by unsystematic inter/intra-observer rectum-contouring errors and registration accuracy near the anterior rectal wall. Consequently, clinical use of distribution-adding to assess rectal doses requires careful contour and registration evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calyn R Moulton
- School of Physics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Michael J House
- School of Physics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Victoria Lye
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Colin I Tang
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Michele Krawiec
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - David J Joseph
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - James W Denham
- School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- School of Physics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.,Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
de Jong R, Lutkenhaus L, van Wieringen N, Visser J, Wiersma J, Crama K, Geijsen D, Bel A. Plan selection strategy for rectum cancer patients: An interobserver study to assess clinical feasibility. Radiother Oncol 2016; 120:207-11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2016] [Revised: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
11
|
Moulton CR, House MJ, Lye V, Tang CI, Krawiec M, Joseph DJ, Denham JW, Ebert MA. Registering prostate external beam radiotherapy with a boost from high-dose-rate brachytherapy: a comparative evaluation of deformable registration algorithms. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:254. [PMID: 26666538 PMCID: PMC4678702 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0563-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2015] [Accepted: 12/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Registering CTs for patients receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with a boost dose from high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR) can be challenging due to considerable image discrepancies (e.g. rectal fillings, HDR needles, HDR artefacts and HDR rectal packing materials). This study is the first to comparatively evaluate image processing and registration methods used to register the rectums in EBRT and HDR CTs of prostate cancer patients. The focus is on the rectum due to planned future analysis of rectal dose-volume response. METHODS For 64 patients, the EBRT CT was retrospectively registered to the HDR CT with rigid registration and non-rigid registration methods in VelocityAI. Image processing was undertaken on the HDR CT and the rigidly-registered EBRT CT to reduce the impact of discriminating features on alternative non-rigid registration methods applied in the software suite for Deformable Image Registration and Adaptive Radiotherapy Research (DIRART) using the Horn-Schunck optical flow and Demons algorithms. The propagated EBRT-rectum structures were compared with the HDR structure using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD) and average surface distance (ASD). The image similarity was compared using mutual information (MI) and root mean squared error (MSE). The displacement vector field was assessed via the Jacobian determinant (JAC). The post-registration alignments of rectums for 21 patients were visually assessed. RESULTS The greatest improvement in the median DSC relative to the rigid registration result was 35 % for the Horn-Schunck algorithm with image processing. This algorithm also provided the best ASD results. The VelocityAI algorithms provided superior HD, MI, MSE and JAC results. The visual assessment indicated that the rigid plus deformable multi-pass method within VelocityAI resulted in the best rectum alignment. CONCLUSIONS The DSC, ASD and HD improved significantly relative to the rigid registration result if image processing was applied prior to DIRART non-rigid registrations, whereas VelocityAI without image processing provided significant improvements. Reliance on a single rectum structure-correspondence metric would have been misleading as the metrics were inconsistent with one another and visual assessments. It was important to calculate metrics for a restricted region covering the organ of interest. Overall, VelocityAI generated the best registrations for the rectum according to the visual assessment, HD, MI, MSE and JAC results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calyn R Moulton
- School of Physics (M013), University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia.
| | - Michael J House
- School of Physics (M013), University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
| | - Victoria Lye
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
| | - Colin I Tang
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
| | - Michele Krawiec
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
| | - David J Joseph
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
- School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
| | - James W Denham
- School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- School of Physics (M013), University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Price RG, Vance S, Cattaneo R, Schultz L, Elshaikh MA, Chetty IJ, Glide-Hurst CK. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology. Med Phys 2014; 41:081907. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4885976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
13
|
Sharp G, Fritscher KD, Pekar V, Peroni M, Shusharina N, Veeraraghavan H, Yang J. Vision 20/20: perspectives on automated image segmentation for radiotherapy. Med Phys 2014; 41:050902. [PMID: 24784366 PMCID: PMC4000389 DOI: 10.1118/1.4871620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 224] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2014] [Revised: 04/01/2014] [Accepted: 04/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to rapid advances in radiation therapy (RT), especially image guidance and treatment adaptation, a fast and accurate segmentation of medical images is a very important part of the treatment. Manual delineation of target volumes and organs at risk is still the standard routine for most clinics, even though it is time consuming and prone to intra- and interobserver variations. Automated segmentation methods seek to reduce delineation workload and unify the organ boundary definition. In this paper, the authors review the current autosegmentation methods particularly relevant for applications in RT. The authors outline the methods' strengths and limitations and propose strategies that could lead to wider acceptance of autosegmentation in routine clinical practice. The authors conclude that currently, autosegmentation technology in RT planning is an efficient tool for the clinicians to provide them with a good starting point for review and adjustment. Modern hardware platforms including GPUs allow most of the autosegmentation tasks to be done in a range of a few minutes. In the nearest future, improvements in CT-based autosegmentation tools will be achieved through standardization of imaging and contouring protocols. In the longer term, the authors expect a wider use of multimodality approaches and better understanding of correlation of imaging with biology and pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Sharp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Karl D Fritscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | | | - Marta Peroni
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Nadya Shusharina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Harini Veeraraghavan
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065
| | - Jinzhong Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mattiucci GC, Boldrini L, Chiloiro G, D'Agostino GR, Chiesa S, De Rose F, Azario L, Pasini D, Gambacorta MA, Balducci M, Valentini V. Automatic delineation for replanning in nasopharynx radiotherapy: what is the agreement among experts to be considered as benchmark? Acta Oncol 2013; 52:1417-22. [PMID: 23957565 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2013.813069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Anatomic changes during head and neck radiotherapy require replanning. The primary aim of this study is the definition of the agreement among experts in the head and neck automatic delineation frame to use as benchmark. The secondary goal is to assess the reliability of automatic delineation for nasopharynx radiotherapy and time saving. MATERIAL AND METHODS A computed tomography (CT) scan was acquired in 10 nasopharynx patients along intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment for replanning. Deformable registration with replanning autocontouring of the structures was performed using VelocityAI 2.3© software defining Structure Set A. The optimization of these contours was obtained through revision by a skilled operator, drawing Structure Set B. An ex novo Structure Set C was segmented on the replanning CT-scan by an expert delineation team. The mean Dice's Similarity Index (mDSI) was calculated between Structure Set A and B, A and C, and between B and C for each volume. All segmentation times for organs at risk (OARs) and clinical target volume (CTV) were recorded and compared. RESULTS We validated the replanning autocontoured Structure Sets for 10 patients. For volumetric analysis we observed mDSI values of 0.87 for the OARs, 0.70 for nodes, 0.90 for CTV in the Structure Set A-B comparison and respectively of 0.74, 0.63 and 0.78 for the Structure Set A-C one, and 0.78, 0.78 and 0.85 for Structure Set B-C, which represents the existing expert based benchmark. We calculated a mean saved time in Structure Set B of 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS Autocontouring procedures offer considerable segmentation time saving with acceptable reliability of the contours, even if an independent check procedure for their optimization is still required to increase their adherence to referential benchmark gold standard among experts, which stands at a 0.80 DSI value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Radiation Oncology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|