Phase II clinical trial of whole-brain irradiation plus three-dimensional conformal boost with concurrent topotecan for brain metastases from lung cancer

Efficacy of Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Plus Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB-WBRT) for Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Objective: To investigate the outcomes of SIB-WBRT in patients with brain metastases and analyze the impact of some factors on prognosis. Materials and Methods: This single-arm retrospective study analyzed patients with brain metastases who were treated with SIB-WBRT at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from September 2015 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was intracranial progression free survival (iPFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), intracranial new foci, and tumor control. The Kaplan-Meier method was then used to depict and estimate iPFS, OS, intracranial neoplasia, and tumor control. Finally, the Cox model was used to analyze the association between some relevant factors and outcomes. Results: A total of 107 patients were included and the median iPFS in these patients treated with SIB-WBRT was 13.4 (95% CI: 4.2-22.6) months, with 68.0% (95% CI: 57.4%-78.6%) and 50.8% (95% CI: 38.3%-63.3%) iPFS at 6- and 12-months. The median local control was 37.6 (95% CI: 28.3-46.8) months, with local control rates of 84.3% (95% CI: 80.6%-88.0%) and 73.3% (95% CI: 68.2%-78.4%) at 6- and 12-months. The median time to appearance of new intracranial foci was 17.4 (95% CI: 14.1-20.8) months, and the 6- and 12-month control rates were 74.5% (95% CI: 64.5%-84.5%) and 61.5% (95% CI: 49.0%-74.0%). The number of brain metastases in patients before treatment was significantly associated with iPFS (HR=0.4, 95% CI: 0.2-0.973, P=0.043). Conclusions: The iPFS, local control, and intracranial new foci of patients with brain metastases after treatment with SIB-WBRT were acceptable. In addition, the number of brain metastases in patients before treatment may be associated with iPFS.

The therapeutic effect of radiotherapy combined with systemic therapy compared to radiotherapy alone in patients with simple brain metastasis after first-line treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy (RT) plus systemic therapy (ST) with RT alone in patients with simple brain metastasis (BM) after first-line treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

METHODS

The patients were treated at a single center from January 2011 to January 2022. BM only without metastases to other organs was defined as simple BM. The eligible patients were divided into RT alone (monotherapy arm) and RT plus ST (combined therapy arm). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to examine factors associated with increased risk of extracranial progression. After 1:1 propensity score matching analysis, two groups were compared for extracranial progression-free survival (ePFS), PFS, overall survival (OS), and intracranial PFS (iPFS).

RESULTS

133 patients were identified and 100 were analyzed (monotherapy arm: n = 50, combined therapy arm: n = 50). The ePFS of the combined therapy was significantly longer than that of the monotherapy, with a median ePFS of 13.2 months (95% CI, 6.6-19.8) in combined therapy and 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.7-10.7) in monotherapy (P = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in PFS (P = 0.057), OS (P = 0.309), or iPFS (P = 0.448). Multifactorial analysis showed that combined therapy was independently associated with better ePFS compared with monotherapy (HR = 0.617, P = 0.034); more than 5 BMs were associated with worse ePFS compared with 1-5 BMs (HR = 1.808, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with RT alone, combined therapy improves ePFS in patients with simple BM after first-line treatment of LS-SCLC. Combined therapy and 1-5 BMs reduce the risk of extracranial recurrence.

Antitumor Therapy Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment

The development and progression of tumors in human tissues extensively rely on its surrounding environment, that is, tumor microenvironment which includes a variety of cells, molecules, and blood vessels. These components are modified, organized, and integrated to support and facilitate the growth, invasion, and metabolism of tumor cells, suggesting them as potential therapeutic targets in anticancer treatment. An increasing number of pharmacological agents have been developed and clinically applied to target the oncogenic components in the tumor microenvironment, and in this review, we will summarize these pharmacological agents that directly or indirectly target the cellular or molecular components in the tumor microenvironment. However, difficulties and challenges still exist in this field, which will also be reported in this literature.

RT-based combination therapy for brain metastasis from NSCLC with non-EGFR mutation/ALK gene rearrangement: A network meta-analysis

Introduction

Radiotherapy (RT) is currently the main treatment for brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to the short survival time and obvious adverse reactions of RT, we urgently need more appropriate treatment. This network meta-analysis reviewed the efficacy and adverse effects of radiotherapy-based combination therapy for patients without targeted epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement NSCLC BMs, to screen out the therapy with the best efficacy.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from the earliest publication date available to 1 April 2022. STATA15.0 was used to conduct heterogeneity analysis, sensitivity analysis, forest plot analysis, and publication bias analysis.

Results

A total of 28 studies, involving 3707 patients were included in the Bayesian network meta-analysis. In the limited paired meta-analysis for head-to-head comparative trials, compared with RT-based combination therapy, RT combined with Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) showed significant overall survival (OS) benefit (HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.47–0.9, p<0.01), RT combined with ICIs showed a non-significant difference for intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) (HR 0.76, 95%CI 0.27–2.27, p<0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.9, 95%CI 0.36–2.37, p<0.01). In addition, according to the ranking results, compared with RT combined with chemotherapy(CT) or with targeted therapy(TT), RT combined with ICIs might be the best treatment mode for OS(ICIs+RT vs CT+RT vs TT+RT; 91.9% vs. 27.8% vs. 29.3%, iPFS (ICIs+RT vs CT+RT vs TT+RT, 46.9% vs 25.2% vs 25.6%) and PFS (ICIs+RT vs CT+RT vs TT+RT, 36.2% vs 31% vs 36.5%).

Conclusions

RT combined with ICIs might be the best treatment mode to prolong the OS for BMs from NSCLC with non-EGFR mutation/ALK gene rearrangement.

Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022350065, identifier (CRD42022350065)

Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost Versus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy Plus Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Brain Metastasis From Lung Cancer

Radiotherapy is one of the most important treatments for brain metastasis (BM). This study aimed to assess whether whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) provided any therapeutic benefit compared to WBRT followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Seventy-two consecutive cases of lung cancer with BM treated from January 2014 to June 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-seven patients were treated with WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) and SIB (45 Gy in 10 fractions), and 35 patients were treated with WBRT (30 Gy in ten fractions) followed by SRS (16–24 Gy according to the maximum tumor diameter). The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were intracranial objective response (partial and complete responses), pattern of intracranial progression, overall survival (OS), and toxicity. The WBRT + SIB group had a significantly longer median intracranial PFS (9.1 vs. 5.9 months, P = 0.001) than the WBRT + SRS group. The intracranial objective response rate was 67.6% and 62.9% in the WBRT + SIB and in WBRT + SRS groups, respectively (P = 0.675). The incidence of progression outside the P-GTV in the WBRT + SIB group was significantly lower than that in the WBRT + SRS group (39.4% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.004). The median OS was 24.3 and 20.3 months in the WBRT + SIB and WBRT + SRS groups, respectively (P = 0.205). There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3 or worse adverse reactions between the two groups. Compared to treatment with WBRT + SRS, that with WBRT + SIB for BM appeared to contribute to local control.

Efficacy and safety of treatment modalities across EGFR selected/unselected populations with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of treatment modalities across different populations with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases.

METHODS

A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, the ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conferences. The main outcomes of interest were progression-free survival, overall survival, and severe adverse events. Bayesian network meta-analytical techniques were implemented, to compare treatment modalities based on efficacy and safety profiles. The protocol for this study has been registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42020155330).

RESULTS

15 randomized controlled trials with a total of 1216 patients were analyzed. Network meta-analysis generated six comparisons both in EGFR positive and EGFR unselected populations. For patients harboring EGFR positive mutations, osimertinib appears to significantly increase progression-free survival, compared to 1st generation EGFR-TKI (HR 0.46, 95 %CI 0.38-0.55), 2nd generation EGFR-TKI (HR: 0.59, 95 %CI 0.34-0.99), conventional chemotherapy (HR 0.30, 95 %CI 0.14-0.66), radiotherapy (HR 0.20, 95 %CI 0.14-0.29), and radiotherapy plus 1st generation TKI (HR 0.21, 95 %CI 0.14-0.32). Osimertinib also appears to increase the likelihood of survival and prolong overall survival. For EGFR unselected patients, combined anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody with conventional chemotherapy appears superior to radiotherapy (HR: 0.20, 95 % CI 0.14-0.29), conventional chemotherapy (HR: 0.42, 95 %CI 0.28-0.68), radiotherapy plus conventional chemotherapy (HR: 0.59, 95 %CI 0.32-0.98), radiotherapy plus 1st generation TKI (HR:0.49, 95 %CI 0.25-0.96), and immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy (HR:0.44, 95 %CI 0.28-0.69). However, combination therapies are generally more toxic causing an increased number of severe adverse events, particularly when anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody is combined with conventional chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib appears to be the most effective and safest treatment in NSCLC patients with brain metastases, harboring EGFR positive mutations. The anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody and conventional chemotherapy combination increases survival for NSCLC patients with brain metastases who were not selected according to EGFR mutation, although this increased benefit positively correlates with an increased number of severe adverse events.

Intra-CSF topotecan in treatment of breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastases

BACKGROUND

There are few treatment options for patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM).

METHODS

We report a case series of patients with breast cancer and LM treated with intra-CSF topotecan (TOPO). Outcome was assessed by clinical exam and MRI at baseline, at end of induction (4-5 weeks), then every 3 months; CSF cytology was determined at baseline and with each treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-one women [median age, 58 (37-81); median KPS 60 (40-100)] received treatment. At baseline, 68% had positive CSF cytology, and 90%, leptomeningeal enhancement on MRI. 84% of patients also received focal RT (not during TOPO) and 77% received concomitant systemic hormonal or chemotherapy. Median number of TOPO treatments was 14.5 (range, 3-71); median duration of treatment, 11 weeks (1-176); and median OS, 6.9 months (range, 0.9-48.8). Patients remaining progression-free during 4-6 weeks of induction (81%) had a median OS of 11.5 months (range, 1.8-48.8). Overall neurologic PFS at 6, 12, and 24 months was 39%, 26%, and 6%, respectively. Clearing of CSF malignant cells for >3 consecutive samples occurred in 10/21 (48%) patients with positive CSF cytology at baseline, remaining clear for a median duration of 15.9 months (range, 1.4-34.5). Grade 3 adverse events included headache or vomiting (3pts), T2 hyperintensity surrounding the ventricular catheter (2 pts), and meningitis (2 pts).

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-CSF TOPO, with focal RT as needed for symptomatic areas of enhancement produced durable clearing of CSF malignant cells in 48% of patients positive at baseline, with promising median PFS and OS.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Role of Chemotherapy in the Management of Adults With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Brain Tumors

QUESTION 1

Should patients with brain metastases receive chemotherapy in addition to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for the treatment of their brain metastases?

TARGET POPULATION

This recommendation applies to adult patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases amenable to both chemotherapy and radiation treatment.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level 1: Routine use of chemotherapy following WBRT for brain metastases is not recommended. Level 3: Routine use of WBRT plus temozolomide is recommended as a treatment for patients with triple negative breast cancer.

QUESTION 2

Should patients with brain metastases receive chemotherapy in addition to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of their brain metastases?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level 1: Routine use of chemotherapy following SRS is not recommended. Level 2: SRS is recommended in combination with chemotherapy to improve overall survival and progression free survival in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

QUESTION 3

Should patients with brain metastases receive chemotherapy alone?

RECOMMENDATION

Level 1: Routine use of cytotoxic chemotherapy alone for brain metastases is not recommended as it has not been shown to increase overall survival.Please see the full-text version of this guideline (https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-treatment-adults-metastatic-brain-tumors/chapter_5) for the target population of each recommendation.

Role of Recursive Partitioning Analysis and Graded Prognostic Assessment on Identifying Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases Who May Benefit from Postradiation Systemic Therapy

Background

The role of postradiation systemic therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BM) was controversial. Thus, we explored the role of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RTOG-RPA) and graded prognostic assessment (GPA) in identifying population who may benefit from postradiation systemic therapy.

Methods

The clinical data of NSCLC patients with documented BM from August 2007 to April 2015 of two hospitals were studied retrospectively. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis. Survival of patients with or without postradiation systemic therapy was compared in subgroups stratified according to RTOG-RPA or GPA.

Results

Of 216 included patients, 67.1% received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 24.1% received whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), and 8.8% received both. After radiotherapy, systemic therapy was administered in 58.3% of patients. Multivariate analysis found that postradiation systemic therapy (yes vs. no) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.361, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.202-0.648, P = 0.001), radiation technique (SRS vs. WBRT) (HR = 0.462, 95% CI = 0.238-0.849, P = 0.022), extracranial metastasis (yes vs. no) (HR = 3.970, 95% CI = 1.757-8.970, P = 0.001), and Karnofsky performance status (<70 vs. ≥70) (HR = 5.338, 95% CI = 2.829-10.072, P < 0.001) were independent factors for survival. Further analysis found that subsequent tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy could significantly reduce the risk of mortality of patients in RTOG-RPA Class II (HR = 0.411, 95% CI = 0.183-0.923, P = 0.031) or with a GPA score of 1.5-2.5 (HR = 0.420, 95% CI = 0.182-0.968, P = 0.042). However, none of the subgroups stratified according to RTOG-RPA or GPA benefited from the additional conventional chemotherapy.

Conclusion

RTOG-RPA and GPA may be useful to identify beneficial populations in NSCLC patients with BM if TKIs were chosen as postradiation systemic therapy.

Inhibitors of HIF-1α and CXCR4 Mitigate the Development of Radiation Necrosis in Mouse Brain

PURPOSE

There is mounting evidence that, in addition to angiogenesis, hypoxia-induced inflammation via the hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α)-CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) pathway may contribute to the pathogenesis of late-onset, irradiation-induced necrosis. This study investigates the mitigative efficacy of an HIF-1α inhibitor, topotecan, and a CXCR4 antagonist, AMD3100, on the development of radiation necrosis (RN) in an intracranial mouse model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Mice received a single-fraction, 50-Gy dose of hemispheric irradiation from the Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion and were then treated with either topotecan, an HIF-1α inhibitor, from 1 to 12 weeks after irradiation, or AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist, from 4 to 12 weeks after irradiation. The onset and progression of RN were monitored longitudinally via noninvasive, in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from 4 to 12 weeks after irradiation. Conventional hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry staining were performed to evaluate the treatment response.

RESULTS

The progression of brain RN was significantly mitigated for mice treated with either topotecan or AMD3100 compared with control animals. MRI-derived lesion volumes were significantly smaller for both of the treated groups, and histologic findings correlated well with the MRI data. By hematoxylin-eosin staining, both treated groups demonstrated reduced irradiation-induced tissue damage compared with controls. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry results revealed that expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor, CXC chemokine ligand 12, CD68, CD3, and tumor necrosis factor α in the lesion area were significantly lower in treated (topotecan or AMD3100) brains versus control brains, while ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1) and HIF-1α expression was similar, though somewhat reduced. CXCR4 expression was reduced only in topotecan-treated mice, while interleukin 6 expression was unaffected by either topotecan or AMD3100.

CONCLUSIONS

By reducing inflammation, both topotecan and AMD3100 can, independently, mitigate the development of RN in the mouse brain. When combined with first-line, antiangiogenic treatment, anti-inflammation therapy may provide an adjuvant therapeutic strategy for clinical, postirradiation management of tumors, with additional benefits in the mitigation of RN development.

Systemic Therapy after Radiotherapy Significantly Reduces the Risk of Mortality of Patients with 1-3 Brain Metastases: A Retrospective Study of 250 Patients

Background:

For patients with a brain metastasis (BM), systemic therapy is usually administered after the completion of radiotherapy, especially in cases of multiple BMs. However, the role of systemic therapy in patients with a limited number of BMs is not clear. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to explore this question.

Methods:

Consecutive patients with a pathologically confirmed malignancy and 1–3 intracranial lesions that had been documented within the last decade were selected from the databases of three hospitals in China.

Results:

A total of 250 patients were enrolled; of them, 135 received radiotherapy alone and 115 received radiotherapy plus systemic therapy. In patients receiving whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) as radiotherapy, 28 received WBRT alone and 35 patients received WBRT plus systemic therapy. Of the patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 107 received SRS alone and 80 received SRS plus systemic therapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that systemic therapy significantly reduced the risk of mortality compared with radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.294, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.158–0.548). Further, when the analysis was conducted in subgroups of WBRT (HR = 0.230, 95% CI = 0.081–0.653) or SRS (HR = 0.305, 95% CI = 0.127–0.731), systemic therapy still showed the ability to reduce the risk of mortality in patients with BMs.

Conclusion:

Systemic therapy after either SRS or WBRT radiotherapy may significantly reduce the risk of mortality of patients with 1–3 BMs.

Efficacy and safety of antitumor agents plus radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone for brain metastases from lung cancer

The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of different therapeutic regimens for brain metastases (BMs) from lung cancer (LC). A total of 13 controlled trials (1,783 cases) involving chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors or endostatin plus radiotherapy (combination group) vs. radiotherapy alone group were identified from PubMed. Compared with the radiotherapy alone group, the combination group resulted in a significant benefit for objective response rate (ORR) [risk ratio (RR), 1.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19–1.60; P<0.0001], notably prolonged the time to central nervous system progression [CNS-TTP; hazard ratio (HR), 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57–0.90; P=0.004] and progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44–0.83; P=0.002); however, failed in prolonging the overall survival (OS; HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.61–1.05; P=0.11) with a higher overall severe adverse events (AEs, Grade ≥3; RR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.24–5.35; P=0.01). Notably, subgroup analysis demonstrated that targeted therapy plus radiotherapy possessed a superior OS compared with radiotherapy alone (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37–0.90; P=0.01) with mild non-hematological toxicity and without severe hematotoxicity. The present study demonstrated that targeted agents plus radiotherapy possessed desirable effects with mild adverse events. Secondary to best, chemoradiotherapy is an alternative option for patients without suitable molecular targets.

Brain metastasis reirradiation in patients with advanced breast cancer

The outcome of recurrent brain metastasis is dismal. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes and toxicity of reirradiation as a salvage treatment for progressive brain metastasis in patients with advanced breast cancer. Between July 2005 and September 2014, the medical records of 56 patients with brain metastasis from breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 39 received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) reirradiation (Group 1), and 17 received SRS followed by WBRT reirradiation (Group 2). Overall survival (OS) and brain progression-free survival rates/times were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Change in neurologic function was also assessed. The median OS was 10.8 months (range, 1.3-56.8 months). In Group 1, the median PFS time (PFS-1) was 6.5 months and the OS time was 11.4 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that longer OS was significantly associated with a high Karnofsky performance score (KPS) (P = 0.004), controlled extracranial metastasis (P = 0.001) and a good response to reirradiation (P = 0.034). In Group 2, the median PFS time (PFS-2) after reirradiation was 8.5 months and the OS time was 10.8 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that longer OS was significantly associated with a high KPS (P = 0.018). The majority of the patients had improved or stable neurological function. Reirradiation is an effective and a safe treatment for patients with brain metastases from breast cancer. It might delay the progression of intracranial disease and improve neurological function. A suitable patient selection for reirradiation was suggested.

Radiosurgery alone versus radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation for very few cerebral metastases from lung cancer

Background

It is unclear whether patients with few cerebral metastases benefit from whole-brain irradiation added to radiosurgery. Since primary tumors disseminating to the brain show different behavior, this question should be answered separately for each tumor type. This study compared both treatments in patients with 1-3 cerebral metastases from lung cancer.

Methods

Ninety-eight patients receiving radiosurgery alone were retrospectively compared to 50 patients receiving radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation for local control, distant cerebral control and overall survival. Ten other characteristics were additionally considered including radiosurgery dose, age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, histology, number of cerebral metastases, maximum diameter of all cerebral metastases, site of cerebral metastases, extra-cerebral metastases, and interval from lung cancer diagnosis to irradiation.

Results

The treatment approach had no significant impact on local control (p = 0.61). On multivariate analysis of local control, ECOG performance score was significant (risk ratio [RR]: 2.10; p < 0.001). The multivariate analysis of distant brain control revealed significant positive associations with radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation (RR: 4.67; p < 0.001) and one cerebral metastasis (RR: 2.62; p < 0.001). Treatment approach was not significantly associated with overall survival (p = 0.32). On multivariate analysis, significant associations with overall survival were found for maximum diameter of all cerebral metastases (RR: 1.81; p = 0.008), extra-cerebral metastases (RR: 2.98; p < 0.001), and interval from lung cancer diagnosis to irradiation (RR: 1.19; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Addition of whole-brain irradiation to radiosurgery significantly improved distant brain control in patients with few cerebral metastases from lung cancer. This improvement did not translate into better overall survival.