1
|
Lievens Y, Janssens S, Lambrecht M, Engels H, Geets X, Jansen N, Moretti L, Remouchamps V, Roosens S, Stellamans K, Verellen D, Weltens C, Weytjens R, Van Damme N. Coverage with evidence development program on stereotactic body radiotherapy in Belgium (2013-2019): a nationwide registry-based prospective study. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2024; 44:100992. [PMID: 39045286 PMCID: PMC11265534 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
Background Although stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was progressively adopted in clinical practice in Belgium, a reimbursement request in 2011 was not granted because of remaining clinical and economic uncertainty. A coverage with evidence development (CED) program on SBRT started in 2013, with the aim to assess clinical and technical patterns-of-care in Belgium and monitor survival per indication, in view of supporting inclusion in the reimbursement system. Methods The Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI) initiated this prospective observational registry. Participating departments, using SBRT in clinical practice, signed the 'NIHDI convention'. Eligible patients had a primary tumour (PT) or oligometastatic disease (OMD). Patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics were collected through an online module of the Belgian Cancer Registry, prerequisite for financing. Five-year overall survival (5YOS) and 30- and 90-days mortality were primary outcomes, derived from vital status information. Findings Between 10/2013 and 12/2019, 20 of the 24 accredited radiotherapy departments participated, 6 were academic. Registered cases per department ranged from 21 to 867. Of 5675 registrations analysed, the majority had good performance status and limited number of lesions. Enrolment of PTs remained stable over time, OMDs almost doubled. Peripheral lung lesions dominated in PTs as in OMDs. Other metastases were (para)spinal, 'non-standard' and hepatic. Thirty- and 90-days mortalities remained below 0.5% [95% CI 0.3%-0.8%] respectively 2.1% [95% CI 1.6%-2.7%]. 5YOS varied by indication, primary prostate patients performing best (85%, 95% CI [76%, 96%]), those with liver metastases worst (19%, 95% CI [15%, 24%]). Better OS was observed in academic departments, department size did not significantly impact survival. OMD survival was better in 2018-19. Interpretation CED can be used to define patterns-of-care and real-life outcome of innovative radiotherapy. As the observed survival for different indications was in line with outcome in emerging literature, SBRT was included in the Belgian reimbursement system as of January 2020. Funding NIHDI financed participating departments per registered case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolande Lievens
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Maarten Lambrecht
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Engels
- Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Xavier Geets
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Jansen
- Radiation Oncology Department, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Luigi Moretti
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Remouchamps
- Radiation Oncology Department, CHU UCL, Namur, Site Sainte Elisabeth, Belgium
| | - Sander Roosens
- Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Dirk Verellen
- Radiation Oncology Department Iridium Netwerk/University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Caroline Weltens
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Reinhilde Weytjens
- Radiation Oncology Department Iridium Netwerk/University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | | | - Belgian College for Physicians of Radiation Oncology Centres
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance, Brussels, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department, CHU UCL, Namur, Site Sainte Elisabeth, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department Iridium Netwerk/University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Completeness of reporting oligometastatic disease characteristics in literature and influence on oligometastatic disease classification using the ESTRO/EORTC nomenclature. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:587-595. [PMID: 35738308 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing evidence for the integration of locally ablative therapy into multimodality treatment of oligometastatic disease (OMD). To support standardised data collection, analysis, and comparison, a consensus OMD classification based on fundamental disease and treatment characteristics has previously been established. This study investigated the completeness of reporting the proposed OMD characteristics in literature and evaluated whether the proposed OMD classification system can be applied to the historical data. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, searching for prospective and retrospective studies, where SBRT was a treatment component of OMD. Reporting of the OMD characteristics as described in the EORTC/ESTRO classification was analyzed, feasibility to retrospectively classify the proposed OMD states was investigated and the impact of the categorisation on overall survival (OS) was evaluated. RESULTS Our study shows incomplete reporting of the proposed OMD characteristics. The most fully reported characteristic was 'type of involved organs' (88/95 studies); 'history of cancer progression' was the least reported (not mentioned in 50/95 studies). Retrospective OMD classification of existing literature was only possible for 7/95 studies. With respect to categorization as de novo, repeat or induced OMD, homogeneous patient cohorts were observed in 21/95 studies, most frequently de novo OMD, in 20 studies. Differences in OS at 2, 3, or 5 years were not statistically significant between the different states. OS was significantly influenced by primary tumor histology, with superior OS observed for prostate cancer and worst OS observed for non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSION The largely incomplete reporting of the proposed OMD characteristics hampers a retrospective classification of existing literature. To facilitate future comparison of individual studies, as well as validation of the OMD classification, comprehensive reporting of OMD characteristics using standardised terminology is recommended, as proposed by the EORTC/ESTRO classification system and following ESTRO-ASTRO consensus.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kutuk T, Herrera R, Mustafayev TZ, Gungor G, Ugurluer G, Atalar B, Kotecha R, Hall MD, Rubens M, Mittauer KE, Contreras JA, McCulloch J, Kalman NS, Alvarez D, Romaguera T, Gutierrez AN, Garcia J, Kaiser A, Mehta MP, Ozyar E, Chuong MD. Multi-Institutional Outcomes of Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) with a Median Biologically Effective Dose of 100 Gy10 for Non-Bone Oligometastases. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100978. [PMID: 35647412 PMCID: PMC9130084 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Randomized data show a survival benefit of stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy in selected patients with oligometastases (OM). Stereotactic magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may facilitate the delivery of ablative dose for OM lesions, especially those adjacent to historically dose-limiting organs at risk, where conventional approaches preclude ablative dosing. Methods and Materials The RSSearch Registry was queried for OM patients (1-5 metastatic lesions) treated with SMART. Freedom from local progression (FFLP), freedom from distant progression (FFDP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (LS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. FFLP was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Toxicity was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 criteria. Results Ninety-six patients with 108 OM lesions were treated on a 0.35 T MR Linac at 2 institutions between 2018 and 2020. SMART was delivered to mostly abdominal or pelvic lymph nodes (48.1%), lung (18.5%), liver and intrahepatic bile ducts (16.7%), and adrenal gland (11.1%). The median prescribed radiation therapy dose was 48.5 Gy (range, 30-60 Gy) in 5 fractions (range, 3-15). The median biologically effective dose corrected using an alpha/beta value of 10 was 100 Gy10 (range, 48-180). No acute or late grade 3+ toxicities were observed with median 10 months (range, 3-25) follow-up. Estimated 1-year FFLP, FFDP, PFS, and OS were 92.3%, 41.1%, 39.3%, and 89.6%, respectively. Median FFDP and PFS were 8.9 months (95% confidence interval, 5.2-12.6 months) and 7.6 months (95% confidence interval, 4.5-10.6 months), respectively. Conclusions To our knowledge, this represents the largest analysis of SMART using ablative dosing for non-bone OM. A median prescribed biologically effective dose of 100 Gy10 resulted in excellent early FFLP and no significant toxicity, likely facilitated by continuous intrafraction MR visualization, breath hold delivery, and online adaptive replanning. Additional prospective evaluation of dose-escalated SMART for OM is warranted.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ganau M, Gallinaro P, Cebula H, Scibilia A, Todeschi J, Gubian A, Nannavecchia B, Signorelli F, Pop R, Coca HA, Proust F, Chibbaro S. Intracranial Metastases from Prostate Carcinoma: Classification, Management, and Prognostication. World Neurosurg 2019; 134:e559-e565. [PMID: 31678450 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate carcinomas rarely metastasize to the central nervous system but, when they do, dural localizations are as common as and far more aggressive than intraparenchymal ones. Those metastases can be further classified according to their extension toward the subdural or extradural space and can frequently simulate other pathologic conditions including chronic subdural hematomas, abscess, and primary bone tumors. Beside the challenges of the preoperative differential diagnostic and complexity of surgical planning and operative excision, subdural metastases seem to carry a much poorer prognosis. METHODS A series of consecutive patients admitted during a 12-year period through our oncall pathway for subdural/extradural collections or intraparenchymal lesions found, on histologic analysis, to represent intracranial prostate cancer metastases was retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS A total of 19 patients were included, but only 3 were diagnosed with small cell prostate carcinoma, while the majority had a primary prostate adenocarcinoma. Metastases could be classified as pure subdural space lesions, dural-based lesions, extradural/bony lesions, and pure intraparenchymal lesions. All patients with subdural metastases and 3 out of 5 patients with dural-based lesions required an emergency intervention due to rapidly deteriorating neurologic status. The mean follow-up in our series was 37 months; only subdural localizations had a remarkably unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS Supported by our experience and the review of the literature, we suggest that a low threshold for contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging is advisable in case of suspicious subdural collection, even in an emergency setting, for patients with previous medical history of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Ganau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Paolo Gallinaro
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Helene Cebula
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Antonino Scibilia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Julien Todeschi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Arthur Gubian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | - Raoul Pop
- Department of Neuroradiology, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Hugo-Andres Coca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Francois Proust
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Salvatore Chibbaro
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tabasso AFS, Jones DJL, Jones GDD, Macip S. Radiotherapy-Induced Senescence and its Effects on Responses to Treatment. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:283-289. [PMID: 30826201 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is still a treatment of choice for many malignancies, often in combination with other strategies. However, its efficacy is limited by the dose that can be safely administered without eliciting serious side-effects, as well as the fact that recurrence is common, particularly in large tumours. Combining radiotherapy with drugs that could sensitise cells to radiation and/or reduce the factors that promote the recovery of the surviving cancer cells is a promising approach. Ionising radiation has been shown to induce senescence and the accumulation of senescent cells creates a microenvironment that facilitates neoplastic growth. This provides a rationale to test the addition of anti-senescent drugs, some of which are already available in the clinic, to radiotherapy protocols. Here, we discuss the relevance of radiotherapy-induced senescent cell accumulation and the potential interventions to minimise its negative effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A F S Tabasso
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; Mechanisms of Cancer and Ageing Laboratory, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - D J L Jones
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - G D D Jones
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - S Macip
- Mechanisms of Cancer and Ageing Laboratory, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Singh R, Ansinelli H, Jenkins J, Davis J, Sharma S, Vargo JA. Stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: A comparison of clinical outcomes from the RSSearch patient registry. JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT 2019; 6:19-26. [PMID: 30775071 PMCID: PMC6355446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare clinical outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) for vestibular schwannomas (VS). MATERIALS/METHODS We identified 64 VS patients from the RSSearch Patient Registry (12 treated with SRS and 52 patients treated with fSRS). Potential factors predictive of local control (LC) and toxicity were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards model, and binary logistic regressions with propensity score weighting. RESULTS SRS (100%) and fSRS (94.2%) resulted in similar LC (p = 0.33). fSRS was associated with a higher likelihood of experiencing toxicities (42.3% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.054 on time-to-event analysis) that was maintained following a propensity-score weighted binary logistic regression (p = 0.037) and propensity-score weighted Cox regression (p = 0.039; hazard ratio (HR) = 8.85 (95% CI: 1.1 - 70.1)). CONCLUSION In a multi-institutional analysis, we note equivalent LC but higher toxicity with fSRS compared to SRS for VS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raj Singh
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | - Hayden Ansinelli
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | - Jan Jenkins
- The Radiosurgery Society, Sunnyvale, CA 94402, USA
| | - Joanne Davis
- The Radiosurgery Society, Sunnyvale, CA 94402, USA
| | - Sanjeev Sharma
- St. Mary’s Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntington, WV 25701, USA
- Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntington, WV 25701, USA
| | - John Austin Vargo
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ansinelli H, Singh R, Sharma DL, Jenkins J, Davis J, Vargo JA, Sharma S. Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Previously Irradiated Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis from the RSSearch® Registry. Cureus 2018; 10:e3237. [PMID: 30410843 PMCID: PMC6214645 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To report on overall survival (OS), local control (LC), dose-outcome relationships, and related toxicities following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for locally recurrent, previously irradiated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (rSCCHN). Methods We queried the prospectively-maintained RSSearch® Registry for patients with rSCCHN treated with five-fraction SBRT from January 2008 to November 2016. Patients with non-squamous cell histology, missing registry data regarding prior irradiation, those treated with less than five fractions of SBRT, and those treated with SBRT in primary or boost settings were excluded. LC and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with comparisons between groups completed using log-rank t-tests and multivariable Cox regression. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine factors predictive of toxicity. Results Forty-five rSCCHN patients treated with SBRT delivered in five fractions at 12 radiotherapy centers were identified. Prescription doses ≥ 40 Gy were associated with higher one-year rates of OS, LC, and a higher likelihood of experiencing toxicities. Acute and late toxicity rates were low (22.2% and 15.6%, respectively) and were all Grade 1-2 with only one late Grade 3 esophagitis. Conclusion Salvage SBRT for rSCCHN resulted in outcomes comparable to prior single-institutional reports in a multi-institutional cohort across clinical settings with low toxicity, thus supporting more widespread adoption of SBRT with recommended doses ≥ 40 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayden Ansinelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, USA
| | - Raj Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | - Dana L Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA
| | - Jan Jenkins
- Clinical Programs, The Radiosurgery Society, San Mateo, USA
| | - Joanne Davis
- Executive Director, The Radiosurgery Society, San Mateo, USA
| | - John A Vargo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, USA
| | - Sanjeev Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Mary's Medical Center, Huntington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Role of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Oncological and Non-Oncological Clinical Settings: Highlights from the 7th Meeting of AIRO – Young Members Working Group (AIRO Giovani). TUMORI JOURNAL 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/1778.19280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
9
|
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver metastasis - clinical outcomes from the international multi-institutional RSSearch® Patient Registry. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:26. [PMID: 29439707 PMCID: PMC5811977 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-0969-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2017] [Accepted: 02/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for liver metastases in patients unsuitable for surgery. We investigated factors associated with clinical outcomes for liver metastases treated with SBRT from a multi-center, international patient registry. Methods Patients with liver metastases treated with SBRT were identified in the RSSearch® Patient Registry. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics associated with treatment outcomes were assessed. Dose fractionations were normalized to BED10. Overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were evaluated using Kaplan Meier analysis and log-rank test. Results The study included 427 patients with 568 liver metastases from 25 academic and community-based centers. Median age was 67 years (31–91 years). Colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) was the most common primary cancer. 73% of patients received prior chemotherapy. Median tumor volume was 40 cm3 (1.6–877 cm3), median SBRT dose was 45 Gy (12–60 Gy) delivered in a median of 3 fractions [1–5]. At a median follow-up of 14 months (1–91 months) the median overall survival (OS) was 22 months. Median OS was greater for patients with CRC (27 mo), breast (21 mo) and gynecological (25 mo) metastases compared to lung (10 mo), other gastro-intestinal (GI) (18 mo) and pancreatic (6 mo) primaries (p < 0.0001). Smaller tumor volumes (< 40 cm3) correlated with improved OS (25 months vs 15 months p = 0.0014). BED10 ≥ 100 Gy was also associated with improved OS (27 months vs 15 months p < 0.0001). Local control (LC) was evaluable in 430 liver metastases from 324 patients. Two-year LC rates was better for BED10 ≥ 100 Gy (77.2% vs 59.6%) and the median LC was better for tumors < 40 cm3 (52 vs 39 months). There was no difference in LC based on histology of the primary tumor. Conclusions In a large, multi-institutional series of patients with liver metastasis treated with SBRT, reasonable LC and OS was observed. OS and LC depended on dose and tumor volume, while OS varied by primary tumor. Future prospective trials on the role of SBRT for liver metastasis from different primaries in the setting of multidisciplinary management including systemic therapy, is warranted. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01885299.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ohri N, Tomé W, Kalnicki S, Garg M. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: The importance of treatment planning algorithm and evaluation of a tumor control probability model. Pract Radiat Oncol 2017; 8:e33-e39. [PMID: 29233523 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Revised: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A previous report introduced the term size-adjusted biologically effective dose (sBED), which accounts for tumor diameter and biologically effective dose (BED) and may be used to predict the likelihood of local control following SBRT. Here we seek to replicate those findings using a separate dataset. METHODS AND MATERIALS We queried the RSSearch Patient Registry for patients treated with SBRT for stage I NSCLC. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank testing, and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to evaluate tumor diameter, BED, and treatment planning algorithm as predictors of local control. sBED was defined as BED minus 10 times the tumor diameter (in centimeters). Tumor control probability (TCP) modeling was performed to characterize the relationship between sBED and the likelihood of local control 2 years after SBRT. RESULTS A total of 928 patients met inclusion criteria. Median BED was 115.5 Gy, and 59% of patients had T1 tumors. Local control rates following treatments planned using a pencil beam algorithm were inferior to those observed following treatments planned using a Monte Carlo algorithm (89% vs 96% at 2 years, log-rank P = .022). In a multivariable Cox model adjusted for tumor diameter and BED, the use of a pencil beam planning algorithm was associated with increased risk of local failure (hazard ratio, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-5.29; P = .032). TCP modeling, restricted to patients treated using a Monte Carlo algorithm, demonstrated that sBED values of 60, 80, and 100 Gy yield predicted TCP rates of 91%, 95%, and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Using a large, multi-institutional database, we found a strong association between treatment planning algorithm and local control rates following SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. sBED is a useful tool for predicting the likelihood of local control following SBRT in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
| | - Wolfgang Tomé
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Shalom Kalnicki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Madhur Garg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ricco A, Hanlon A, Lanciano R. Propensity Score Matched Comparison of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy vs Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Survival Analysis from the National Cancer Database. Front Oncol 2017; 7:185. [PMID: 28913176 PMCID: PMC5583523 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE No direct comparisons between extreme hypofractionation and conventional fractionation have been reported in randomized trials for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The goal of this study is to use a propensity score matched (PSM) analysis with the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for the comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for organ confined prostate cancer. METHODS Men with localized prostate cancer treated with radiation dose ≥72 Gy for IMRT and ≥35 Gy for SBRT to the prostate only were abstracted from the NCDB. Men treated with previous surgery, brachytherapy, or proton therapy were excluded. Matching was performed to eliminate confounding variables via PSM. Simple 1-1 nearest neighbor matching resulted in a matched sample of 5,430 (2,715 in each group). Subset analyses of men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 10, GS = 7, and GS > 7 yielded matched samples of 1,020, 2,194, and 247, respectively. RESULTS No difference in survival was noted between IMRT and SBRT at 8 years (p = 0.65). Subset analyses of higher risk men with PSA > 10 or GS = 7 histology or GS > 7 histology revealed no difference in survival between IMRT and SBRT (p = 0.58, p = 0.68, and p = 0.62, respectively). Variables significant for survival for the matched group included: age (p < 0.0001), primary payor (p = 0.0001), Charlson/Deyo Score (p = 0.0002), PSA (p = 0.0013), Gleason score (p < 0.0001), and use of hormone therapy (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION Utilizing the NCDB, there is no difference in survival at 8 years comparing IMRT to SBRT in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Subset analysis confirmed no difference in survival even for intermediate- and high-risk patients based on Gleason Score and PSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Ricco
- Philadelphia Cyberknife, Havertown, PA, United States
- Crozer Keystone Health Care System, Springfield, PA, United States
| | - Alexandra Hanlon
- University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Rachelle Lanciano
- Philadelphia Cyberknife, Havertown, PA, United States
- Crozer Keystone Health Care System, Springfield, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yahya A, Arneric E, Kernutt E, Baldacchino F, Haworth C, Kedda MA, Tang C, Bydder S, Corica T. Participating in an International Stereotactic Radiotherapy Patient Registry: The Establishment of Data Collection Pathways. Cureus 2017; 9:e1413. [PMID: 28856078 PMCID: PMC5574631 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To describe data collection pathways and practical challenges experienced by an academic comprehensive cancer centre aiming to record clinical data for patients being treated with a novel radiotherapy treatment modality. Methods Various options to capture data from all patients treated with the CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery System at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (SCGH) in Western Australia were explored. An international multicenter web-based secure database established and maintained by the Radiosurgery Society the RSSearch® Patient Registry was selected. Data were collected and entered over four contiguous phases, with either opt-in or opt-out consent and the completion of Patient Reported Outcome questionnaires for specific sub-groups. Results Between April 2014 and June 2016, 461 patients at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital were enrolled in the RSSearch® Patient Registry with the collection of over 17,500 data items. From 461 patients enrolled, 447 patients were treated with the CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery System. The majority of patients were treated for either a malignant primary (43.2%) or metastatic disease (39.4%). The establishment of matrix organisational processes for data collection led to the development of improved workflow patterns and data collection pathways. Conclusions This article describes the processes developed by a single centre to establish an efficient system for data collection and participation in an international registry. The opt-out approach was more efficient in terms of patient recruitment compared to the informed-consent method used in earlier phases. The experience of this single centre may help inform other institutions considering data collection options for assessments of new or novel treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aylin Yahya
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials and Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Eva Arneric
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials and Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Kernutt
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials and Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Fiona Baldacchino
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials and Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Claire Haworth
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials and Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Kedda
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials and Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Colin Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Sean Bydder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Tammy Corica
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials and Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Singh R, Ansinelli H, Sharma S. Clinical outcomes following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s13566-017-0313-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
14
|
Brandner ED, Chetty IJ, Giaddui TG, Xiao Y, Huq MS. Motion management strategies and technical issues associated with stereotactic body radiotherapy of thoracic and upper abdominal tumors: A review from NRG oncology. Med Phys 2017; 44:2595-2612. [PMID: 28317123 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been well demonstrated. However, it presents unique challenges for accurate planning and delivery especially in the lungs and upper abdomen where respiratory motion can be significantly confounding accurate targeting and avoidance of normal tissues. In this paper, we review the current literature on SBRT for lung and upper abdominal tumors with particular emphasis on addressing respiratory motion and its affects. We provide recommendations on strategies to manage motion for different, patient-specific situations. Some of the recommendations will potentially be adopted to guide clinical trial protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward D Brandner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and UPMC CancerCenter, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Indrin J Chetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Tawfik G Giaddui
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Ying Xiao
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - M Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and UPMC CancerCenter, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ricco A, Davis J, Rate W, Yang J, Perry D, Pablo J, D'Ambrosio D, Sharma S, Sundararaman S, Kolker J, Creach KM, Lanciano R. Lung metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: the RSSearch® patient Registry's experience. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:35. [PMID: 28143558 PMCID: PMC5286804 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0773-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2016] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To report overall survival and local control for patients identified in the RSSearch® Patient Registry with metastatic cancer to the lung treated with SBRT. Methods Seven hundred two patients were identified with lung metastases in the RSSearch® Registry. Of these patients, 577 patients had SBRT dose and fractionation information available. Patients were excluded if they received prior surgery, radiation, or radiofrequency ablation to the SBRT treated area. Between April 2004-July 2015, 447 patients treated with SBRT at 30 academic and community-based centers were evaluable for overall survival (OS). Three hundred four patients with 327 lesions were evaluable for local control (LC). All doses were converted to Monte Carlo equivalents and subsequent BED Gy10 for dose response analysis. Results Median age was 69 years (range, 18–93 years). Median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 90 (range 25/75% 80–100). 49.2% of patients had prior systemic therapy. Median metastasis volume was 10.58 cc (range 25/75% 3.7–25.54 cc). Site of primary tumor included colorectal (25.7%), lung (16.6%), head and neck (11.4%), breast (9.2%), kidney (8.1%), skin (6.5%) and other (22.1%). Median dose was 50 Gy (range 25/75% 48–54) delivered in 3 fractions (range 25/75% 3–5) with a median BED of 100Gy10 (range 25/75% 81–136). Median OS for the entire group was 26 months, with actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of 74.1%, 33.3, and 21.8%, respectively. Patients with head and neck and breast cancers had longer median OS of 37 and 32 months respectively, compared to colorectal (30 months) and lung (26 months) which corresponded to 3-year actuarial OS of 51.8 and 47.9% for head and neck and breast respectively, compared to 35.8% for colorectal and 31.2% for lung. The median LC for all patients was 53 months, with actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year LC rates of 80.4, 58.9, and 46.3%, respectively. There was no difference in LC by primary histologic type (p = 0.49). Improved LC was observed for lung metastases that received SBRT doses of BED ≥100Gy10 with 3-year LC rate of 77.1% compared to 45% for lung metastases treated with BED < 100Gy10 (p = 0.01). Smaller tumor volumes (<11 cc) had improved LC compared to tumor volumes > 11 cc. (p = 0.005) Two-year LC rates for tumor volumes < 11 cc, 11–27 cc and > 27 cc were 72.9, 64.2 and 45.6%, respectively. This correlated with improved OS with 2-year OS rates of 62.4, 60.9 and 46.2% for tumor volumes < 11 cc, 11–27 cc and > 27 cc, respectively (p = 0.0023). In a subset of patients who received BED ≥100Gy10, 2-year LC rates for tumor volumes < 11 cc, 11–27 cc and > 27 cc were 82.8, 58.9 and 68.6%, respectively (p = 0.0244), and 2-year OS rates were 66.0, 58.8 and 28.5%, respectively (p = 0.0081). Conclusion Excellent OS and LC is achievable with SBRT utilizing BED ≥100Gy10 for lung metastases according to the RSSearch® Registry data. Patients with small lung metastases (volumes < 11 cc) had better LC and OS when using SBRT doses of BED ≥100Gy10. Further studies to evaluate a difference, if any, between various tumor types will require a larger number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Ricco
- Crozer-Keystone Health System, Philadelphia CyberKnife, Havertown, PA, USA
| | | | - William Rate
- Crozer-Keystone Health System, Philadelphia CyberKnife, Havertown, PA, USA
| | - Jun Yang
- Crozer-Keystone Health System, Philadelphia CyberKnife, Havertown, PA, USA
| | - David Perry
- MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John Pablo
- St. Joseph's/Chandler Savannah Hospital, Savannah, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | - James Kolker
- Pennsylvania Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Rachelle Lanciano
- Crozer-Keystone Health System, Philadelphia CyberKnife, Havertown, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Niranjan A, Layne D, Briercheck M, Trofimova S, Monaco EA, Kano H, Lunsford LD. Implementation of a New UPMC Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Quality Assurance Registry. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2017; 95:49-59. [PMID: 28135704 DOI: 10.1159/000454893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2016] [Accepted: 12/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT In this report, we discuss the development of a new, comprehensive, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant electronic quality assurance (QA) registry for Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery patients. This registry can be used to query outcomes, link with current hospital electronic medical records, and share data with future corporate or national professional society registries under development. METHODS A clinical task force comprising physicians and regulatory, legal, and information technology (IT) experts was created to define the nomenclature, regulatory requirements, hosting site, and required capabilities of the proposed system. A team of physicians and IT experts defined the clinical parameters and designed the query functions for the registry. RESULTS The UPMC GK Registry was established as a QA registry exempt from Institutional Review Board oversight. In order to facilitate subsequent query functions (analytics), data entry was created for 3 main categories: brain tumors, vascular malformations, and functional disorders. A Microsoft SQL-based database infrastructure was employed. CONCLUSIONS We developed a new UPMC GK QA registry and successfully migrated our previous data on 13,000 patients into the registry. This simplified and user-friendly registry offers clinicians the opportunity to participate in national registries and to contribute to multicenter evidence-based outcome analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ricco A, Manahan G, Lanciano R, Hanlon A, Yang J, Arrigo S, Lamond J, Feng J, Mooreville M, Garber B, Brady L. The Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer by NCCN Risk Groups. Front Oncol 2016; 6:184. [PMID: 27602330 PMCID: PMC4994110 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this study is to compare freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) between stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with organ confined prostate cancer treated between 2007 through 2012 utilizing the 2015 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk stratification guidelines. A secondary objective is to compare our updated toxicity at last follow-up compared with pretreatment with respect to bowel, bladder, sexual functioning, and need for invasive procedures between the two groups. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 270 consecutive men treated with either SBRT (n = 150) or IMRT (n = 120) at a community hospital with two distinct radiation departments and referral patterns. Charts were reviewed for pretreatment and treatment factors including race, age, clinical T stage, initial PSA, Gleason score, use of androgen deprivation therapy, treatment with SBRT vs. IMRT, as well as stratification by 2015 NCCN guidelines. Kaplan-Meier (KM) methodology was used to estimate FFBF, with statistical comparisons accomplished using log rank tests. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to establish independent factors prognostic of biochemical failure. Descriptive statistics were used to describe toxicity graded by a modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) late radiation morbidity scoring system. RESULTS Significant prognostic factors in univariate analysis for FFBF included NCCN risk groups (p = 0.0032), grade (p = 0.019), and PSA (p = 0.008). There was no significant difference in FFBF between SBRT vs. IMRT (p = 0.46) with 6-year actuarial FFBF of 91.9% for SBRT and 88.9% for IMRT. Multivariable analysis revealed only the NCCN risk stratification to be significant predictor for FFBF (p = 0.04). Four-year actuarial FFBF by NCCN risk stratification was 100% very low risk, 100% low risk, 96.5% intermediate risk, 94.5% high risk, and 72.7% very high risk. There were no grade 3 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities for either SBRT or IMRT at last follow-up. CONCLUSION No significant difference in FFBF was found between SBRT and IMRT for organ confined prostate cancer in multivariable analysis within this retrospective data set. Overall toxicity was low. The 2015 NCCN risk stratification was validated in this population and was the only significant factor for FFBF in multivariable analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Ricco
- Philadelphia Cyberknife, Delaware County Memorial Hospital, Havertown, PA, USA
| | - Genevieve Manahan
- Philadelphia Cyberknife, Delaware County Memorial Hospital, Havertown, PA, USA
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rachelle Lanciano
- Philadelphia Cyberknife, Delaware County Memorial Hospital, Havertown, PA, USA
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Jun Yang
- Philadelphia Cyberknife, Delaware County Memorial Hospital, Havertown, PA, USA
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen Arrigo
- Philadelphia Cyberknife, Delaware County Memorial Hospital, Havertown, PA, USA
| | - John Lamond
- Philadelphia Cyberknife, Delaware County Memorial Hospital, Havertown, PA, USA
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jing Feng
- Philadelphia Cyberknife, Delaware County Memorial Hospital, Havertown, PA, USA
| | - Michael Mooreville
- Philadelphia Cyberknife, Delaware County Memorial Hospital, Havertown, PA, USA
| | - Bruce Garber
- Philadelphia Cyberknife, Delaware County Memorial Hospital, Havertown, PA, USA
| | - Luther Brady
- Philadelphia Cyberknife, Delaware County Memorial Hospital, Havertown, PA, USA
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Singh R, Davis J, Sharma S. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Examination of Treatment Outcomes. Cureus 2016; 8:e554. [PMID: 27182468 PMCID: PMC4858443 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The purposes of this study are to assess the effectiveness of CyberKnife® stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in providing both initial and sustained pain relief for patients with both forms of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), assess potential prognostic factors, and examine treatment-related toxicities. Methods The RSSearch® Patient Registry was screened for TN cases from July 2007 to June 2015. We evaluated initial pain relief achieved by examining changes in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores following SRS. Prognostic factors relating to initial pain relief and the relationship between maximum dose (Dmax) and toxicity incidence were analyzed via univariate logistic regressions. We evaluated prognostic factors relating to sustained pain relief using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Results Our analysis included 125 TN1 patients and 38 TN2 patients with initial VAS scores ≥ 3 treated at 16 community radiotherapy centers. Median Dmax for both cohorts was 75 Gy with a larger range for TN1 cases (67.42 Gy - 110.29 Gy) as compared to TN2 cases (70.00 Gy - 78.48 Gy). At initial follow-up, mean VAS scores after SRS were significantly lower for TN1 and TN2 patients (p < 0.0001). The vast majority of TN1 (87.2%) and TN2 (86.8%) patients experienced initial pain relief. Higher initial VAS scores (p = 0.015) were correlated with a greater likelihood of initial treatment success for TN1 patients. We did not identify any treatment or patient characteristics that had significant effects on initial pain relief for TN2 patients. Of the TN1 cohort, 28 of 125 patients reported follow-ups one year or greater after SRS. Twenty-three of 28 TN1 patients (82%) reported VAS scores of 1 or less at one-year follow-up, and eight of 11 patients (72%) had VAS scores of 1 or less at the two-year follow-up. No potential prognostic factors for long-term pain relief were significant. Roughly 18% and 11% of TN1 and TN2 patients, respectively, experienced acute toxicities (all RTOG Grade 1 or 2), with the most common being sensory neuropathy, generalized pain, and nausea. Dmax > 75 Gy was not a predictor of toxicity incidence in TN1 cases (p = 0.597) but was significant for TN2 patients (p = 0.0009 following Fisher's exact test). Conclusions SRS is an effective treatment option for TN patients in community settings. Initial pain relief following SRS was achieved in a vast majority of TN patients with associated minor toxicities observed in less than 20% of all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raj Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University
| | | | - Sanjeev Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Mary's Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Davis J, Sharma S, Shumway R, Perry D, Bydder S, Simpson CK, D'Ambrosio D. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Toxicity and Biochemical Disease-Free Outcomes from a Multi-Institutional Patient Registry. Cureus 2015; 7:e395. [PMID: 26798571 PMCID: PMC4699985 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To report on initial patient characteristics, treatment practices, toxicity, and early biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) of localized prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and enrolled in the RSSearch® Patient Registry. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with clinically localized prostate cancer enrolled in RSSearch® from June 2006 - January 2015. Patients were classified as low-risk (PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml, T1c-T2a, Gleason score ≤ 6), intermediate-risk (PSA 10.1 - 20 ng/ml, T2b-T2c, or Gleason 7), or high-risk (PSA > 20 ng/ml, T3 or Gleason ≥ 8). Toxicity was reported using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3. Biochemical failure was assessed using the Phoenix definition (nadir + 2 ng/ml). The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate bDFS and association of patient and tumor characteristics with the use of SBRT. Results: Four hundred thirty-seven patients (189 low, 215 intermediate, and 33 high-risk) at a median of 69 years (range: 48-88) received SBRT at 17 centers. Seventy-eight percent of patients received 36.25 Gy/5 fractions, 13% received 37 Gy/5 fractions, 6% received 35 Gy/5 fractions, 3% received 38 Gy/4 fractions, and 5% received a boost dose of 19.5-29 Gy following external beam radiation therapy. Median follow-up was 20 months (range: 1–64 months). Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were minimal, with no acute or late Grade 3+ GU or GI toxicity. Late Grade 1 and 2 urinary frequency was 25% and 8%. Late Grade 1 and 2 proctitis was 3% and 2%. Median PSA decreased from 5.8 ng/ml (range: 0.3-43) to 0.88, 0.4, and 0.3 ng/ml at one, two, and three years. Two-year bDFS for all patients was 96.1%. Two-year bDFS was 99.0%, 94.5%, and 89.8% for low, intermediate, and high-risk patients (p < 0.0001). Two-year bDFS was 99.2%, 93.2%, and 90.4% for Gleason ≤ 6, Gleason 7, and Gleason ≥ 8 (p < 0.0001). Two-year bDFS was 96.4%, 97.2%, and 62.5% for PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml, PSA 10.1 - 20 ng/ml, and PSA > 20 ng/ml (p < 0.0001). Clinical T Stage was not significantly associated with bDFS. Conclusions: Early disease outcomes of SBRT for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer from a multicenter patient registry compare favorably with reports from single institutions. Acute and late GU and GI toxicities were minimal, and PSA response to SBRT was highly encouraging. Continued accrual and follow-up will be necessary to confirm long-term results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sanjeev Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Mary's Medical Center
| | - Richard Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center
| | - David Perry
- Radiation Oncology, Medstar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sean Bydder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | | | - David D'Ambrosio
- Radiation Oncology, Community Medical Center-Barnabas Health ; NJ Cyberknife, Community Medical Center-Barnabas Health
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Davis JN, Medbery C, Sharma S, Pablo J, Kimsey F, Perry D, Muacevic A, Mahadevan A. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for centrally located early-stage non-small cell lung cancer or lung metastases from the RSSearch(®) patient registry. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:113. [PMID: 25975848 PMCID: PMC4443630 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0417-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2014] [Accepted: 05/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for centrally located primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or lung metastases from the RSSearch® Patient Registry, an international, multi-center patient registry dedicated to radiosurgery and SBRT. Methods Eligible patients included those with centrally located lung tumors clinically staged T1-T2 N0, M0, biopsy-confirmed NSCLC or lung metastases treated with SBRT between November 2004 and January 2014. Descriptive analysis was used to report patient demographics and treatment patterns. Overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were determined using Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was reported using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Results In total, 111 patients with 114 centrally located lung tumors (48 T1-T2,N0,M0 NSCLC and 66 lung metastases) were treated with SBRT at 19 academic and community-based radiotherapy centers in the US and Germany. Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 1–72). Median age was 74 years for primary NSCLC patients and 65 years for lung metastases patients (p < 0.001). SBRT dose varied from 16 – 60 Gy (median 48 Gy) delivered in 1–5 fractions (median 4 fractions). Median dose to centrally located primary NSCLC was 48 Gy compared to 37.5 Gy for lung metastases (p = 0.0001) and median BED10 was 105.6 Gy for primary NSCLC and 93.6 Gy for lung metastases (p = 0.0005). Two-year OS for T1N0M0 and T2N0M0 NSCLC was 79 and 32.1 %, respectively (p = 0.009) and 2-year OS for lung metastases was 49.6 %. Two-year LC was 76.4 and 69.8 % for primary NSCLC and lung metastases, respectively. Toxicity was low with no Grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities. Conclusion Overall, patients with centrally located primary NSCLC were older and received higher doses of SBRT than those with lung metastases. Despite these differences, LC and OS was favorable for patients with central lung tumors treated with SBRT. Reported toxicity was low, although low grade toxicities were observed in patients where dose tolerances approached or exceeded published guidelines. Prospective studies are needed to further define the optimal SBRT dose for this cohort of patients. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01885299
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne N Davis
- The Radiosurgery Society®, 1350 Dell, Suite 105, Campbell, CA, 95008, USA.
| | - Clinton Medbery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Anthony Hospital, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
| | - Sanjeev Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Mary's Medical Center, Huntington, WV, USA.
| | - John Pablo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Joseph/Candler Hospital, Savannah, GA, USA.
| | - Frank Kimsey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erlanger Health System, Chattanooga, TN, USA.
| | - David Perry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medstar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Alexander Muacevic
- European CyberKnife Center Munich-Grosshadern and Munich University, Munich, Germany.
| | - Anand Mahadevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Increasing Radiation Therapy Dose Is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Stage I Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 91:344-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2014] [Revised: 09/25/2014] [Accepted: 10/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
22
|
Stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: clinical outcomes from a National Patient Registry. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 4:55-63. [PMID: 25774243 PMCID: PMC4348495 DOI: 10.1007/s13566-014-0177-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2014] [Accepted: 12/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a definitive local treatment option for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are not surgical candidates and patients who refuse surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of SBRT on T1–T2 NSCLC from a national registry, reflecting practices and outcomes in a real-world setting. Methods The RSSearch® Patient Registry was screened for T1–T2N0M0 NSCLC patients treated from May 2004 to May 2013 with SBRT. Descriptive analyses were used for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results In total, 723 patients with 517 T1 and 224 T2 lesions were treated with SBRT. Median follow-up was 12 months (1–87 months) with a median age of 76 years. Median SBRT dose was 54 Gy (range 10–80 Gy) delivered in a median of 3 fractions (range 1–5), and median biological equivalent dose (BED10) was 151.2 Gy (range 20–240 Gy). Median OS was 30 and 26 months for T1 and T2 tumors, respectively (p = 0.019). LC was associated with higher BED10 for T2 tumors, but not in T1 tumors at a median follow-up of 17 months. Seventeen-month LC for T2 tumors treated with BED10 < 105 Gy, BED10 105-149, and BED10 ≥ 150 Gy was 43, 74, and 95 %, respectively (p = 0.011). Local failure rates for T2 tumors treated with BED10 < 105 Gy, 105–149 Gy, and ≥150 Gy were 32, 21, and 8 % (p = 0.029), respectively. Median OS for patients with T2 tumors treated with BED10 < 105 Gy was 17 vs. 32 months for T2 tumors treated with BED10 105–149 Gy (p = 0.062). Conclusion SBRT for T1–T2 NSCLC is feasible and effective in the community setting. OS was greater for patients with T1 lesions compared to T2 lesions. An improvement in LC was observed in patients with T2 lesions treated with BED10 > 105 Gy.
Collapse
|
23
|
Freeman D, Dickerson G, Perman M. Multi-institutional registry for prostate cancer radiosurgery: a prospective observational clinical trial. Front Oncol 2015; 4:369. [PMID: 25657929 PMCID: PMC4302811 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 12/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To report on the design, methodology, and early outcome results of a multi-institutional registry study of prostate cancer radiosurgery. Methods: The Registry for Prostate Cancer Radiosurgery (RPCR) was established in 2010 to further evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of prostate radiosurgery (SBRT) for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Men with prostate cancer were asked to voluntarily participate in the registry. Demographic, baseline medical, and treatment-related data were collected and stored electronically in a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant database, maintained by Advertek, Inc. Enrolled men were asked to complete short, multiple choice questionnaires regarding their bowel, bladder, and sexual function. Patient-reported outcome forms were collected at baseline and at regular intervals (every 3–6 months) following treatment. Serial prostate-specific antigen measurements were obtained at each visit and included in the collected data. Results: From July 2010 to July 2013, nearly 2000 men from 45 participating sites were enrolled in the registry. The majority (86%) received radiosurgery as monotherapy. At 2 years follow-up, biochemical disease-free survival was 92%. No Grade 3 late urinary toxicity was reported. One patient developed Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity (rectal bleeding). Erectile function was preserved in 80% of men <70 years old. Overall compliance with data entry was 64%. Conclusion: Stereotactic radiosurgery is an alternative option to conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer. The RPCR represents the collective experience of multiple institutions, including community-based cancer centers, with outcome results in keeping with published, prospective trials of prostate SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mark Perman
- South Florida Radiation Oncology , Stuart, FL , USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mullins K. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: When and Why Is It Appropriate Therapy? J Adv Pract Oncol 2015; 6:351-4. [PMID: 26705495 PMCID: PMC4677807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
|