Emergent laparoscopy in treatment of perforated peptic ulcer: a local experience from a tertiary centre in Saudi Arabia

Clinical presentation and surgical management of perforated peptic ulcer in a tertiary hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia: a 5-year retrospective study

Background

Perforated peptic ulcer is a common surgical emergency condition worldwide, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality if early diagnosis and immediate surgical management were not carried out. Perforation occurs in roughly 5% of PUD patients during their lifetime; this study aimed to explore the wide range of clinical presentations, associated risk factors, complications, and surgical management of perforated peptic ulcer patients.

Methods

A 5-year retrospective observational study on the clinical presentation and surgical management of perforated peptic ulcer is carried out in a tertiary hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia, Department of General Surgery, from January 2017 to December 2021. We included all patients undergoing operations with an intraoperative confirmed diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer at the general surgery department. For operated patients, follow-up evaluation was performed in the outpatient department.

Results

Fifty-one patients underwent an emergency operation for perforated peptic ulcer during the study period. The sociodemographic distribution of patients was 45 (88.2%) males and 6 (11.8%) females, giving a male-to-female ratio of 7.5:1. The mean age of patients was 35.5 ± 16.8 years, and the peak frequency was in the third decade. The commonest presenting symptoms were sudden onset of severe epigastric pain in 42 (82.4%) patients. Patients who presented perforated peptic ulcer within 24 h of initiation of symptoms were free from complications. Age-group and delayed presentation > 48 h after onset of symptoms were linked to postoperative complications and were statistically significant (P 0.032 and P 0.005), respectively. Four patients died (mortality rate of 7.8%). Two patients were reoperated because of the failed primary repair, and 4 patients had > 5 cm intra-abdominal abscess image-guided percutaneous drainage, and the rest were given antibiotic therapy according to peritoneal fluid culture and sensitivity results. The most common microorganism isolated was E. coli 22% and Klebsiella 11%. Other rare microorganisms (pseudomonas, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida spp.) were identified. In half (51%) of the patients with peritoneal fluid culture, no microorganism growth was seen.

Conclusion

The distribution of perforated peptic ulcer is common in the young age-group in the third decades of life. Delayed presentation of the disease is linked because most patients arrived from remote areas where proper facilities of health care and health education are not available and the patient might come to the hospital in an advanced stage of the disease. We suggest conducting further researches, health awareness related to complications over-the-counter drugs self-medication, and bad habit including smoking, and to improve health-seeking behaviors of society.

A Large Stomach Ulcer Is Associated With Raised Mortality in a Cohort of Patients Who Underwent Open Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study

Introduction

Perforated peptic ulcer disease (PPUD) is associated with a high postoperative mortality and morbidity rates especially within the first 90 days. The size and site of the ulcer may contribute to the prognosis of PPUD. In this study, we will describe the association of size and site of PPUD with the overall mortality and in-hospital morbidities in a tertiary care university hospital.

Methods

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A total of 50 patients who had PPUD and underwent open exploratory laparotomy with surgical treatment were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: a small ulcer group when the ulcer diameter was less than equal to 1 cm and a large ulcer group when it was more than 1 cm. For the subgroup analysis, patients were categorized according to site into small duodenum, large duodenum, small stomach, and large stomach PPUD. The primary outcome was overall mortality that was measured by survival analysis and Cox regression. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality, which were assessed by stepwise logistics and linear regression.

Results

Overall mortality at 10, 30, and 90 days was 14% (95% CI: 0.06-0.27), 24% (95% CI: 0.14-0.39), and 34% (95% CI: 0.23-0.49), respectively. Saudi patients had a 72% decreased risk of overall mortality compared to non-Saudi patients (P=0.03) over the follow-up period. Overall, patients who had stomach PPUD had a 2.23-fold increased risk of overall mortality over time compared to those who had duodenum PPUD (P=0.10). Large PPUD, >1 cm, had a 3.20-fold increased risk of overall mortality over time compared to small PPUD (P=0.04). Large stomach PPUD had a 4.22-fold increased risk of overall mortality over time compared to other ulcers (P=0.01).

Conclusions

Large stomach PPUD is associated with increased overall mortality and morbidity. These findings indicate that patients who have a large stomach PPUD might need careful perioperative and postoperative personalized surgical plans as these patients may eventually undergo complicated surgical procedures.

Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Outcome and Associated Morbidity and Mortality

INTRODUCTION

The mainstay of treatment for perforated peptic ulcer is Omental patch closure. With the advent of laparoscopic surgery, this approach is being used for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopy in Firoozgar general hospital over a period of 18 months. The outcome of the laparoscopic approach and the associated morbidity and mortality, operation time, conversion rate and hospital stay were assessed.

METHODS

A prospective analysis of 29 consecutive patients (mean age 37.5 years; 23 men) with perforated peptic ulcers and who had undergone laparoscopic surgery was carried over a period of 18 months from March 2014 until September 2015. Pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative clinical data were collectively analyzed by SPSS 19 for Windows.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients had a history of cigarette smoking, 11 patients had a history of opium consumption, 19 were chronic NSAID users, 26 had Helicobacter pylori infections, and six had a co-morbid condition. Previous surgical history included laparotomy for pancreatic cancer in two patients, for sigmoid colon cancer in one patient, and for acute appendicitis in four patients. The average operating time for all cases was 47.5 + 20 min. The mean lag time between onset of symptoms and surgery was 20.4 hours. All patients underwent laparoscopic closure of the perforation with Omental patch closure. No morbidity was observed, and none of the patients needed conversion to open surgery. One patient died after 11 months of follow-up due to the progression of underlying pancreatic cancer. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.2 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the laparoscopic approach for perforated peptic ulcer were promising, with no conversion to open surgery, no morbidity, and mortality.

Laparoscopic Surgery in Luminal Gastrointestinal Emergencies-a Review of Current Status

Laparoscopy has already established itself as the preferred surgical approach in a variety of elective surgical conditions. Along with its usual advantages of less tissue trauma and faster recovery, its diagnostic as well as therapeutic role is making it an attractive option in emergency surgery. In this paper, we have reviewed the current status of laparoscopic surgery in luminal gastrointestinal emergencies. Relevant papers were selected using Medline database from 2007 to the present. These were reviewed, and outcomes were stated under the headings of appendicitis, perforated peptic ulcer, colorectal emergencies and small bowel obstruction. The laparoscopic intervention was found to be of clear benefit in most of the patients with appendicitis. Its role, however, is not absolutely clear in managing perforated peptic ulcers. Laparoscopic lavage and drainage have been recommended in diverticular perforation with limited contamination. Small case series and studies have shown benefits of laparoscopic surgery in iatrogenic colonic perforations, colonic obstruction, emergency colectomy and small bowel obstruction. Laparoscopic surgery can be recommended in appendicitis and low-risk cases of perforated peptic ulcers. Its definitive role in other conditions needs more evidence. The surgeon's experience and careful patient selection are very important to improve the outcome.