Coronary artery bypass grafting associated to aortic valve replacement in the elderly: survival and quality of life

Early-Term Results of Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement versus Standard Bioprosthesis Implantation Combined with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

OBJECTIVES

Aortic stenosis is highly prevalent among patients with concomitant coronary artery disease. Surgical aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting is usually the treatment of choice for patients with severe aortic stenosis and significant coronary disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome and hemodynamic results of the implantation of rapid-deployment valves (Rapid-Deployment Edwards Intuity Valve System [RDAVR]) versus conventional sutured valves (CSAVR) in combined surgery.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and January 2017, 120 patients underwent replacement via RDAVR and 133 patients underwent replacement using CSAVR with concomitant coronary bypass grafting. Clinical and echocardiographic data were compared.

RESULTS

The mean age was 76 ± 7 for RDAVR patients and 74 ± 6 years for CSAVR patients (p = 0.054); 48% in the RDAVR group were female versus 17% in the CSAVR group (p <0.002). Other characteristics such as diabetes mellitus, body-mass index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nicotine consumption, and extracardiac arteriopathy were similar. Coronary three-vessel disease was more common in the RDAVR group (42.5 vs. 27.8%, p = 0.017). Both mean EuroSCORE II (6.6 ± 5.4 vs. 4.3 ± 3.0, p = 0.001) and STS score (5.4 ± 4.4 vs. 3.4 ± 2.4, p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the RDAVR group. Mean cross-clamp time (82 ± 25 vs. 100 ± 30 minutes, p < 0.001) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (119 ± 38 vs. 147 ± 53 minutes, p < 0.001) were shorter with RDAVR. The mean number of bypass grafts, length of hospital and ICU stays, and mechanical ventilation time were not statistically significant different. Hospital mortality was 2.5% for RDAVR and 9.7% for CSAVR (p = 0.019). There was a similar rate of stroke (5.8 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.990) and postoperative delirium (14.1 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.728). Mean gradients were 8.2 ± 4.1 mm Hg in the RDAVR group vs. 11.3 ± 4.6 mm Hg in the CSAVR group (p = 0.001) at discharge.

CONCLUSION

RDAVR combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can be performed extremely safely. Cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times can be significantly reduced with rapid deployment aortic valve system in the scenario of combined CABG. RDAVR resulted in lower gradients than CSAVR in patients implanted with prostheses of the same size.

Quality of Life Measures in Aortic Stenosis Research: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with aortic stenosis (AS) not only have a reduced life expectancy but also a reduced quality of life (QoL). The benefits of an AS intervention may be considered a balance between a good QoL and a reasonably extended life. However, the different questionnaires being used to determine the QoL were generally not developed for the specific situation of patients with AS and come with strengths and considerable weaknesses. The objective of this article was to provide an overview of the available QoL instruments in AS research, describe their strengths and weaknesses, and provide our assessment of the utility of the available scoring instruments for QoL measurements in AS.

SUMMARY

We identified and reviewed the following instruments that are used in AS research: Short Form Health Survey (SF-36/SF-12), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), the Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale (IIRS), the HeartQoL, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF), the MacNew Questionnaire, and the Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ).

KEY MESSAGES

There is no standardized assessment of QoL in patients with AS. Many different questionnaires are being used, but they are rarely specific for AS. There is a need for AS-specific research into the QoL of patients as life prolongation may compete for an improved QoL in this elderly patient group.

TAVR in 2023: Who Should Not Get It?

Since the first transcatheter delivery of an aortic valve prosthesis was performed by Cribier et al in 2002, the picture of aortic stenosis (AS) therapeutics has changed dramatically. Initiated from an indication of inoperable to high surgical risk, extending to intermediate and low risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now an approved treatment for patients with severe, symptomatic AS across all the risk categories. The current evidence supports TAVR as a frontline therapy for treating severe AS. The crucial question remains concerning the subset of patients who still are not ideal candidates for TAVR because of certain inherent anatomic, nonmodifiable, and procedure-specific factors. Therefore, in this study, we focus on these scenarios and reasons for referring selected patients for surgical aortic valve replacement in 2023.

Quality of Life Worsens After Surgical Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

This study aimed to determine how acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) impacts patients' quality of life. The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) was used to measure quality of life. The eight SF-36 scales were aggregated into a two-factor summary: physical and mental component summary scales (PCS and MCS). One hundred fourteen patients were included in the ATAAD group and 81 patients in the aortic valve replacement (AVR) group. All patients underwent surgery between June 2007 and December 2018. Surveys were completed after the operation. The mean scaled score of the ATAAD group decreased significantly in all eight domains of the SF-36 survey after aortic dissection repair except mental health. Also, the postsurgery PCS score was significantly lower than the presurgery score (39 vs 49; P < 0.0001). Multivariable regression confirmed the negative impact of ATAAD on postsurgery PCS score and higher presurgery PCS score had a significant positive impact. The postsurgery MCS score did not change significantly (49 vs 50; P = 0.32), but higher preoperative MCS score had a significant positive impact on the postsurgery MCS score. Age, sex, connective tissue disorders, and stroke did not contribute significantly to the postsurgery PCS and MCS scores. The AVR group had significantly increased postsurgery PCS and MCS scores compared to the presurgery scores (47 vs 41; P < 0.0001) and (53 vs 51; P = 0.02) respectively. Patients reported significantly decreased physical health after recovery from acute type A aortic dissection repair. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to improve patients' quality of life.

Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life Decline after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Older Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) has been shown to improve survival and quality of life in patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one-third of patients have poor outcome as death, functional decline or quality of life (QoL) decline. The aim of this study was to determine cardiac and geriatric predictors of physical and mental QoL decline 6 months after a TAVI procedure in patients aged 75 and older.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and June 2014, we did a prospective and multicenter study including patients ≥ 75 years old referred for TAVI. The primary outcome was the measure of QoL, assessed by the Short Form 36 survey (SF-36), before and 6 months after the intervention. Association between QoL decline and baseline characteristics including cardiac and geriatric factors was analysed by logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 150 patients studied was 83.7 years old and 56% were men. The primary end point, mean SF-36 physical summary score, significantly improved between baseline and 6-month (33.6 vs. 36.4, p=0.003) whereas mental component score significantly decreased (48.2 vs. 36.4, p-value<0.001). However, patients with presence of depressive symptoms before the intervention had mental QoL improvement at six months (OR 0.04 [0.01-0.19], p-value<0.001) and no significant geriatric predictors were associated with physical QoL decline.

CONCLUSION

The mental QoL significantly decreased and patients with preoperative depressive symptoms had mental QoL improvement at six months. Researches are needed to confirm that mental QoL of patients with depressive symptoms can be improved by TAVI.

Predictors of stroke in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Objective

To determine the risk factors related to the development of stroke in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods

A historical cohort study. We included 4626 patients aged > 18 years who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery, heart valve replacement surgery alone or heart valve surgery combined with coronary artery bypass grafting between January 1996 and December 2011. The relationship between risk predictors and stroke was assessed by logistic regression model with a significance level of 0.05.

Results

The incidence of stroke was 3% in the overall sample. After logistic regression, the following risk predictors for stroke were found: age 50-65 years (OR=2.11 - 95% CI 1.05-4.23 - P=0.036) and age >66 years (OR=3.22 - 95% CI 1.6-6.47 - P=0.001), urgent and emergency surgery (OR=2.03 - 95% CI 1.20-3.45 - P=0.008), aortic valve disease (OR=2.32 - 95% CI 1.18-4.56 - P=0.014), history of atrial fibrillation (OR=1.88 - 95% CI 1.05-3.34 - P=0.032), peripheral artery disease (OR=1.81 - 95% CI 1.13-2.92 - P=0.014), history of cerebrovascular disease (OR=3.42 - 95% CI 2.19-5.35 - P<0.001) and cardiopulmonary bypass time > 110 minutes (OR=1.71 - 95% CI 1.16-2.53 - P=0.007). Mortality was 31.9% in the stroke group and 8.5% in the control group (OR=5.06 - 95% CI 3.5-7.33 - P<0.001).

Conclusion

The study identified the following risk predictors for stroke after cardiac surgery: age, urgent and emergency surgery, aortic valve disease, history of atrial fibrillation, peripheral artery disease, history of cerebrovascular disease and cardiopulmonary bypass time > 110 minutes.

NR2 antibody is associated with quality of life in aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

The relationship between the potential brain injury biomarker N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody and quality of life has never been assessed.

METHODS

We measured serum N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody levels preoperatively in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Quality of life was scored using the Short Form-36 and European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions questionnaires pre- and postoperatively. We analyzed the antibody levels as a continuous variable and as a dichotomous variable with 1.8 ng mL(-1) as the cutoff.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (15 females) with a mean age of 71 ± 8.4 years were recruited for this study. Forty-eight (92%) patients attended the follow-up visit (405 ± 161 days). No mortality or severe neurological event was recorded. In both quality-of-life instruments, the low antibody level group (n = 35) had significantly better scores than the high antibody level group (n = 17) preoperatively. Postoperatively, the scores for both groups improved; however, the low antibody level group continued to score significantly better in most of the physical and mental health domains (p = 0.04 to <0.001). Multiple regression analyses revealed that antibody level and the 1.8 ng mL(-1) cutoff were independently related to quality of life (pre- and postoperatively).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody levels in aortic valve replacement patients are independently related to poorer quality of life pre- and postoperatively.

Operative treatment of combined aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease

Introduction:

The aortic valve replacement is a standard operating procedure in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Structure of patients undergoing surgery ranges from young population with isolated mitral valvular disease to the elderly population, which is in addition to the underlying disease additionally burdened with comorbidity. One of the most commonly present factors that further complicate the surgery is coronary heart disease that occurs in, almost, one third of patients with aortic stenosis. The aim is to compare the results of surgery for aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

Patients and Methods:

From August 2008 to January 2013 in our center operated on 120 patients for aortic stenosis. Of this number, 75 were men and 45 women. The average age was 63.37 years (16-78). Isolated aortic valve replacement was performed in 89 patients and in 31 patients underwent aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery. Implanted 89 biological and 31 mechanical valves.

Results:

Patients with associated aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease were more expressed symptomatic symptoms preoperatively to patients with isolated aortic stenosis who were on average younger age. Intra-hospital morbidity and mortality was more pronounced in the group of patients with concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery. Morbidity was recorded in 17 patients (14.3%) in both groups, while the mortality rate in both groups was 12 patients (10.1%).

Conclusion:

Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and comorbidity in patients with aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease contributes to a significant reduction in intraoperative and postoperative complications. Also, early diagnosis of associated coronary artery disease and aortic stenosis contributes to timely decision for surgery thus avoiding subsequent ischaemic changes and myocardial damage.

The prognostic impact of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting during aortic valve surgery: implications for revascularization in the transcatheter era

OBJECTIVE

Clinicians may give greater consideration to medical management versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for coronary artery disease (CAD) at the time of aortic valve intervention. We evaluated the prognostic impact of revascularization strategy during aortic valve replacement (AVR).

METHODS

We studied 1308 consecutive patients with significant CAD (≥50% stenosis) undergoing AVR with or with out CABG between 2001 and 2010. Late mortality and its determinants were analyzed using multivariable Cox models.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing CABG (n = 1043; 18%) had more frequent angina (50% vs 26%; P < .001), left ventricular dysfunction (22% vs 14%; P = .003), advanced (>70% stenosis) CAD (85% vs 48%; P < .001), and incidence of triple-vessel/left-main CAD (44% vs 8%; P < .001). Whereas operative mortality was comparable between patients undergoing AVR plus CABG versus isolated AVR (2.9% vs 3.0%; P = .90), 5-year (72% vs 64%) and 8-year (50% vs 39%) survival was higher following CABG (P = .007). Adjusting for older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28 per 5 years), female sex (HR, 1.23), peripheral vascular disease (HR, 1.71), New York Heart Association functional class III to IV (HR, 1.48), and diabetes (HR, 1.50) concomitant CABG at AVR reduced late mortality risk by more than one-third (HR, 0.62, 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.79; P < .001). CABG continued to confer a survival advantage in patients with moderate (50%-70%) (HR, 0.62; P = .02) and severe (>70%) CAD (HR, 0.62; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing AVR with coexistent CAD, concomitant CABG reduces risk of late death by more than one-third, without augmenting operative mortality. This survival advantage persists in moderate (50% to 70%) and severe (>70%) CAD. These findings underline the prognostic importance of revascularization in this population and should influence decisions regarding revascularization strategy in patients undergoing transcatheter valve therapy.

Raised IL-2 and TNF-α concentrations are associated with postoperative delirium in patients undergoing coronary-artery bypass graft surgery

BACKGROUND

The knowledge base regarding the pathogenesis of postoperative delirium is limited. The primary aim of this study is to investigate whether increased levels of IL-2 and TNF-α are associated with delirium in patients who underwent coronary-artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The secondary aim is to establish whether any association between raised cytokine levels and delirium is related to surgical and anesthetic procedures or mediated by pre-existing conditions associated with raised cytokine levels, such as major depressive disorder (MDD), cognitive impairment, or aging.

METHODS

Patients were examined and screened for MDD and cognitive impairment one day preoperatively, using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview and The Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Trail Making Test Part B. Blood samples were collected postoperatively for cytokine levels.

RESULTS

Postoperative delirium screening was found positive in 36% (41 of 113) of patients. A multivariate logistic regression revealed that an increased concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines is associated with delirium, and related to advancing age, preoperative cognitive decline of participants, and duration of CPB. According to receiver operating characteristic analysis, the most optimal cut-off for IL-2 and TNF-α concentrations in predicting the development of delirium were 907.5 U/ml and 10.95 pg/ml, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that raised postoperative cytokine concentrations are associated with delirium after CABG surgery. Postoperative monitoring of pro-inflammatory markers combined with regular surveillance may be helpful in the early detection of postoperative delirium in this patient group.

The prognostic significance of declining health-related quality of life scores at 6 months after coronary artery bypass surgery

PURPOSE

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured on the EQ-5D (European quality of life-5 dimensions)-questionnaire has been shown to improve after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), this study investigated whether changes in HRQoL predict later morbidity.

METHODS

Included were 404 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG between 2008 and 2010 who filled the EQ-5D-questionnaire at baseline and 6 months postoperatively. Records were reviewed for later major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after 6 months. Follow-up was 38.6 months (10-58).

RESULTS

Patients who suffered later MACCE more often had suffered an in-hospital postoperative stroke, had a longer in-hospital stay, had lower HRQoL scores at 6 months and deteriorated on several EQ-5D-subscales. Logistic regression showed 6 months visual analogue scale scores and declining function scores to be independent predictors of later MACCE.

CONCLUSION

Deteriorating function and HRQoL-scores at 6 months as compared to baseline postoperatively predict later adverse cardiovascular events after CABG.

Effect of coronary artery disease extent on contemporary outcomes of combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass graft surgery

BACKGROUND

Concomitant aortic valve replacement (AVR) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is a common procedure. Whether the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) influences outcomes of AVR plus CABG is unknown.

METHODS

All AVR plus CABG cases from 2008 to 2010 were extracted from the California CABG Outcomes Reporting Program database. Patients with left main coronary artery stenosis greater than 50% or at least three diseased vessels were defined as having extensive CAD, and patients with one or two diseased coronary vessels were defined as having less extensive CAD. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed for predicting major postoperative complications and 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional hazards model was developed to predict the risk of 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2010, 6,151 AVR plus CABG were performed in California. Compared with patients with one- or two-vessel CAD, patients with extensive CAD undergoing AVR plus CABG were on average older, more often male, had greater prevalence of multiple comorbidities, and underwent more urgent or emergent operations (all p < 0.05). After adjusting for baseline risk factors, AVR plus CABG with extensive CAD was associated with significantly increased risk of major postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.40; p = 0.001) but not operative mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.29; p = 0.978). A Cox proportional hazards model showed that age and other medical comorbidities, but not extensive CAD, were significant risk factors for 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with AVR plus CABG for one- or two-vessel CAD, AVR plus CABG for left main or three or more vessel CAD had higher observed and risk-adjusted rates of postoperative complications but not operative or 1-year mortality.

Hyperkalemic cardioplegia for adult and pediatric surgery: end of an era?

Despite surgical proficiency and innovation driving low mortality rates in cardiac surgery, the disease severity, comorbidity rate, and operative procedural difficulty have increased. Today's cardiac surgery patient is older, has a "sicker" heart and often presents with multiple comorbidities; a scenario that was relatively rare 20 years ago. The global challenge has been to find new ways to make surgery safer for the patient and more predictable for the surgeon. A confounding factor that may influence clinical outcome is high K(+) cardioplegia. For over 40 years, potassium depolarization has been linked to transmembrane ionic imbalances, arrhythmias and conduction disturbances, vasoconstriction, coronary spasm, contractile stunning, and low output syndrome. Other than inducing rapid electrochemical arrest, high K(+) cardioplegia offers little or no inherent protection to adult or pediatric patients. This review provides a brief history of high K(+) cardioplegia, five areas of increasing concern with prolonged membrane K(+) depolarization, and the basic science and clinical data underpinning a new normokalemic, "polarizing" cardioplegia comprising adenosine and lidocaine (AL) with magnesium (Mg(2+)) (ALM™). We argue that improved cardioprotection, better outcomes, faster recoveries and lower healthcare costs are achievable and, despite the early predictions from the stent industry and cardiology, the "cath lab" may not be the place where the new wave of high-risk morbid patients are best served.

A systematic review on the quality of life benefits after aortic valve replacement in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Surgical aortic valve replacement is being increasingly performed in elderly patients with good perioperative outcomes and long-term survival. Evidence is limited on health-related quality of life after aortic valve replacement, which is an important measure of operative success in the elderly.

METHODS

A systematic review of clinical studies after January 2000 was performed to identify health-related quality of life in the elderly after aortic valve replacement. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Quality appraisal of each study also was performed using predefined criteria. Health-related quality of life results were synthesized through a narrative review with full tabulation of the results of all included studies.

RESULTS

Health-related quality of life improvements were shown across most or all domains in different health-related quality of life instruments. Elderly patients experienced marked symptomatic improvement. Health-related quality of life was equivalent or superior to both an age-matched population and younger patients undergoing identical procedures. There were excellent functional gains after surgery, but elderly patients remain susceptible to geriatric issues and mood problems. Concomitant coronary artery bypass did not affect health-related quality of life. There was a diverse range of study designs, methods, and follow-up times that limited direct comparison between studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic valve replacement results in significant health-related quality of life benefits across a broad range of health domains in elderly patients. Age alone should not be a precluding factor for surgery. Data are heterogeneous and mostly retrospective. We recommend future studies based on consistent guidelines provided in this systematic review.

Comparison of results of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians

The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients aged ≥80 years. The present analysis included 274 patients who underwent isolated CABG and 393 patients who underwent PCI. The patients undergoing PCI had a greater prevalence of a history of cardiac surgery and recent myocardial infarction and had more frequently undergone emergency revascularization. Patients undergoing CABG had a significantly greater prevalence of 3-vessel coronary artery disease. The unadjusted 30-day mortality rate was 8.8% after CABG and 7.4% after PCI (p = 0.514). However, on multivariate analysis, CABG was associated with a significantly increased risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio 2.246, 95% confidence interval 1.141 to 4.422). The unadjusted overall intermediate survival was significantly poorer after PCI (at 5 years, CABG 72.2% vs PCI 59.5%, p = 0.004), but this was not confirmed on multivariate analysis. PCI and CABG had similar intermediate survival rates when adjusted for propensity score (p = 0.698), a finding confirmed by the analysis of 130 propensity score-matched pairs (at 5 years, CABG 66.4% vs PCI 58.9%, p = 0.730). In conclusion, the survival of patients aged ≥80 years undergoing CABG is excellent, and the suboptimal survival after PCI seems to be related to the disproportionately greater risk of these patients compared to those undergoing CABG. When adjusted for important clinical variables, PCI and CABG achieved similar intermediate results.