Live related donor lobar lung transplantation recipients surviving well over a decade: still an option in times of advanced donor management

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) is indicated for critically ill patients who would not survive the waiting period in the case of severe brain-dead donor shortage. It is essential to confirm that potential donors are willing to donate without applying psychological pressure from others. In standard LDLLT, the right and left lower lobes donated by 2 healthy donors are implanted into the recipient under cardiopulmonary support. LDLLT can be applied to various lung diseases including restrictive, obstructive, infectious, and vascular lung diseases in both adult and pediatric patients if size matching is acceptable. Functional size matching by measuring donor pulmonary function and anatomical size matching by 3-dimensional computed tomography volumetry are very useful. When 2 donors with ideal size matching are not available, various transplant procedures, such as single lobe, segmental, recipient lobe-sparing, and inverted lobar transplants are valuable options. There seems to be immunological advantages in LDLLT as compared to cadaveric lung transplantation (CLT). Unilateral chronic allograft dysfunction is a unique manifestation after bilateral LDLLT, which may contribute to better prognosis. The growth of adult lung graft implanted into growing pediatric recipients is suggested by radiologic evaluation. Although only 2 lobes are implanted, postoperative pulmonary function is equivalent between LDLLT and CLT. The long-term outcome after LDLLT is similar to or better than that after CLT. The author has performed 164 LDLLTs resulting in 71.6% survival rate at 10 years. All living-donors returned to their previous life styles. Because of possible serious morbidity in donors, LDLLT should be applied only for critically ill patients.

Native lung complications after living-donor lobar lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) is viable for critically ill patients in situations of donor shortage. Because it is sometimes difficult to find 2 ideal living donors with suitable graft sizes, we developed native lung-sparing procedures, including single LDLLT and native upper lobe-sparing LDLLT. This study aimed to investigate native lung complications (NLCs) in native lung-sparing LDLLT.

METHODS

Between April 2002 and March 2019, 92 LDLLTs and 124 cadaveric lung transplantations (CLTs) were performed at the Kyoto University Hospital. Our prospectively maintained database and clinical records were reviewed to compare NLCs among recipients who underwent native lung-sparing LDLLT (n = 21) with those among recipients who underwent single CLT (n = 61).

RESULTS

Among 21 recipients who underwent native lung-sparing LDLLT, 11 NLCs occurred in 8 recipients. No fatal NLC was noted; however, 2 required surgical intervention. Post-transplant survival was not significantly different between native lung-sparing LDLLT recipients with NLCs and those without NLCs. The incidence of NLCs was comparable between native lung-sparing LDLLT recipients and single CLT recipients (8/21 vs 26/61, p = 0.80); however, NLCs occurred significantly later in LDLLT recipients than in CLT recipients (median: 665 vs 181.5 days after transplantation, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

NLCs after native lung-sparing LDLLT had favorable outcomes. Therefore, native lung-sparing LDLLT is a useful treatment option for severely ill patients who cannot wait for CLT. However, it is important to recognize that NLCs may occur later in LDLLT than in CLT.

Living-related lung transplantation

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) was developed to deal with the severe shortage of brain dead door for patients who would not survive the long waiting period. In standard LDLLT, right and left lower lobes removed from two healthy donors are implanted into a recipient after right and left pneumonectomies using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The number of LDLLT has decreased in the USA due to the recent change in allocation system for cadaveric donor lungs. For the past several years, most of the reports on LDLLT have been from Japan, where the average waiting time for a cadaveric lung is exceeding 800 days. LDLLT has been performed both for adult and pediatric patients suffering from various end-stage lung diseases including restrictive, obstructive, vascular and infectious lung diseases. Since only two lobes are implanted, size matching is a very important issue. Functional size matching by measuring donor pulmonary function and anatomical size matching by three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) volumetry are very useful. For oversize graft, we have employed several techniques, including single lobe transplantation, delayed chest closure, downsizing the graft, and middle lobe transplantation. In cases of undersize mismatch, native upper lobe sparing transplant or right-left inverted transplant was performed. The 5-, 10- and 15-year survivals were 80.8%, 72.6% and 61.7%, respectively. There was no difference in survival between standard LDLLT and non-standard LDLLT such as single, sparing and inverted transplant. All donors have been discharged without any restrictions. LDLLT is a viable option for very ill patients who would not survive a long waiting time for cadaveric lungs. We have successfully developed various surgical techniques to overcome size mismatching with favorable outcome.

Surgical Strategy for Lung Transplantation in Adults With Small Chests: Lobar Transplant Versus a Pediatric Donor

BACKGROUND

Adult lung transplant recipients with small chests have traditionally received lungs from pediatric donors, placing an additional strain on the already restricted pediatric donor pool. Performing lobar lung transplantation (LLT) can circumvent issues with donor-recipient size mismatch; however, LLT imparts additional risks. Here, we review our experience using LLT and standard lung transplantation using a pediatric donor (PDLT) for adults with small chests.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with end-stage lung disease and a height of 65 inches or less who underwent LLT (n = 15) or PDLT (n = 15) between 2006 and 2012 at our institution, a high-volume lung transplant center.

RESULTS

Lobar lung transplantation recipients were older (54 ± 10 vs 48 ± 8 years) and had higher pulmonary pressure (57 ± 11 vs 52 ± 27 mmHg) and higher lung allocation scores (70 ± 9 vs 51 ± 8) than PDLT recipients (all P < 0.05). Mean waiting time was 62 days for PDLT and 9 days for LLT. Postoperatively, the incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction and the incidence of acute renal insufficiency were higher, and the mean intensive care unit stay was longer in the LLT group, but the incidence of bronchial anastomotic complications was higher in the PDLT group because of significant size discrepancy in the main bronchus (P < 0.05). Interestingly, long-term functional outcomes and survival rates were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LLT and PDLT are viable surgical options for adult patients with small chests. Because of the potential impact on posttransplant outcomes, the technical complexity of transplantation, decisions regarding the best surgical approach should be made by experienced surgeons.

Transplant in the 21st century

Organ transplantation has enriched and prolonged the lives of many patients who otherwise would have died of organ failure. Many of these advances, which occurred in the later part of the 20th century, are due to improved techniques and pharmacological management. Today, almost every organ can be transplanted. However, donor and recipient criteria can vary widely according to the organ(s) in question. This article reviews the historical changes that have occurred in transplant along with current criteria for donors and recipients, and describes the newest outreach to increase the donor pool.

Living donor lobar lung transplantation: a longstanding concept being revisited with the same old NEMESIS

INTRODUCTION

Living donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) has been successfully used in select patient populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 29-year-old male, who underwent bilateral LDLLT 12 years earlier with allografts donated by father and paternal uncle, developed bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome at distinctly different rates.

CONCLUSION

LDLLT can be done successfully with unique management issues.