An effective and safe innovation for the management of vault prolapse

Comparison between fascia lata and rectus fascia in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this systematic review is to present and compare results from studies that have been using autologous tissue for POP repair.

METHODS

Systematic review was done according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. We aimed to retrieve reports of published and ongoing studies on the efficacy and safety of autologous tissue in vaginal vault prolapse repair. The databases searched were MEDLINE (PubMed interface), Scopus, Cohrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov.

RESULTS

The success rate varied among studies. In fascia-lata group success rate reports varied from 83 to a 100%, with a median follow-up from 12 to 52 months among studies. Rectus fascia reported success rates from 87 to a 100% with a follow-up of 12 months to longest of 98 months.

CONCLUSION

Autologous tissues show satisfying outcomes in terms of safety and efficacy. Sacrocolpopexy procedure with fascia lata has better outcome in term of treatment of prolapse. Harvesting place on lateral side of buttock has more complications in comparison with rectus fascia but size of the graft can be wider in fascia-lata group.

Sacrocolpopexy using autologous rectus fascia: Cohort study of long-term outcomes and complications

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate objective and subjective outcomes of patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy using autologous rectus fascia to provide more data regarding non-mesh alternatives in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

DESIGN

Ambispective cohort study with retrospective and prospective data.

SETTING

A single academic medical centre.

POPULATION

Women who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy using autologous rectus fascia between January 2010 and December 2019.

METHODS

Patients were recruited for a follow-up visit, including completing the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examination. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Composite failure, anatomic failure, symptomatic failure and retreatment.

RESULTS

During the study period, 132 women underwent sacrocolpopexy using autologous rectus fascia. The median follow-up time was 2.2 years. Survival analysis showed that composite failure was 0.8% (95% CI 0.1%-5.9%) at 12 months, 3.5% (95% CI 1.1%-10.7%) at 2 years, 13.2% (95% CI 7.0%-24.3%) at 3 years and 28.3% (95% CI 17.0%-44.8%) at 5 years. The anatomic failure rate was 0% at 12 months, 1.4% (95% CI 0.2%-9.2%) at 2 years, 3.1% (95% CI 0.8%-12.0%) at 3 years and 6.8% (95% CI 2.0%-22.0%) at 5 years. The symptomatic failure rate was 0% at 12 months, 1.3% (95% CI 0.2%-9.0%) at 2 years, 2.9% (95% CI 0.7%-11.3%) at 3 years and 13.1% (95% CI 5.3%-30.3%) at 5 years. The retreatment rate was 0.8% (95% CI 0.1%-5.9%) at 12 months and 2 years, 9.4% (95% CI 4.2%-20.3%) at 3 years and 13.0% (95% CI 6.0%-27.2%) at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Autologous rectus fascia sacrocolpopexy may be considered a safe and effective alternative for patients who wish to avoid synthetic mesh.

The autologous rectus fascia sheath sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy, a mesh free alternative in patients with recurrent uterine and vault prolapse: A contemporary series and literature review

Introduction:

About 40% of women suffer pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in a lifetime. The current standard intervention for vault prolapse is a mesh sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy. However, patients and surgeons are increasingly hesitant to use mesh given recent the UK and Food and Drug Administration warnings and litigation. A possible alternative is to use autologous tissue to support the vault, as a mesh-free solution. We report the outcomes from an initial series of autologous rectus fascia sheath (RFS) sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy in patients with complex pelvic floor dysfunction.

Patients and Methods:

All patients had previous, multiple urological/gynecological surgery and declined standard mesh repairs. All had preoperative videourodynamics and defecating magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. The autologous POP repair was performed using 10–18 cm of rectus sheath with a similar technique to that employing mesh to support the anterior-posterior vaginal walls or encircle the cervix and secured to the sacral promontory.

Results:

Seven patients with a mean age of 52 (33–64) years underwent autologous RFS POP repair between 2014 and 2017. Mean follow-up is 16 (range 2–33) months. All patients have durable result at last follow-up. No significant complications are reported.

Conclusions:

This is the first report of patients with complex pelvic floor dysfunction and apical POP being managed with autologous RFS sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy, and only the second report of a free graft being utilized with success. Autologous RFS sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy avoids the 10%–15% risks of mesh-related complications. Further studies of long-term durability are needed.

Alternative surgical approach for the management of uterine prolapse in young women: preliminary results

AIM

To demonstrate an alternative surgical approach for the management of uterine prolapse in young women by a technique that was previously defined for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault suspension in published work and also to demonstrate successful operative results.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 12 women aged 28-41 years who had stage 4 uterine prolapse and who were surgically treated by abdominal hysteropexy using autogenous rectus fascia strips. Operative results and postoperative follow-up Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Prolapse Quality of Life results were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 35.5 ± 4.1 years (range, 28-41). Mean parity in the study group was 2.6 ± 1.0 (range, 1-5). Mean operation time was 32.0 ± 5.2 min (range, 25-42). All patients were discharged on the postoperative 3rd day and no complications were observed postoperatively. Mean follow-up period was 20 ± 7.0 months (range, 12-36). All of the patients had complete remission for uterine prolapse and none of the patients had complaints related to the operation.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal hysteropexy operation using rectus fascia strips provides a safe and alternative approach for the management of uterine prolapse in young women who desire to preserve their uterus. But further analysis is needed to confirm our results.

Successful treatment of uterine prolapse by abdominal hysteropexy performed during cesarean section

PURPOSE

Uterine prolapse complicating pregnancy is extremely rare. This report presents the surgical correction of uterine prolapse during cesarean section.

CASE

We report a case of a 33-year-old woman with twin gestation who admitted to obstetric clinic with labor pain and total uterine prolapse at 33 weeks of gestation. An emergent cesarean section was performed for the indication of acute fetal distress. At the same operation, following cesarean delivery, abdominal hysteropexy using rectus fascia strips was performed successfully. On control performed 6 months later, patient was examined and it was detected uterine prolapse had regressed and babies were uneventful.

CONCLUSION

This surgical method offers effective treatment of uterine prolapse.