Delayed primary closure of contaminated abdominal wall defects with non-crosslinked porcine acellular dermal matrix compared with conventional staged repair: a retrospective study

Early laparotomy and timely reconstruction for patients with abdominal electrical injury: Five Case Reports and Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

High-tension electricity can cause devastating injuries that may result in abdominal wall loss, visceral damage, and sometimes major threat to life. The visceral organ may be exposed after debridement and require flap cover, but the tensile strength of abdominal wall may be lack even if flap transplanted.

METHODS

From April 2007 through May 2015, 5 patients with severe abdominal electrical injury were treated at our hospital. Exploratory laparotomy was performed based on their clinical manifestations and debridement findings of abdominal wall at early stage, and decision regarding technique for reconstruction of abdominal wall was based on an assessment of the location and extent of the defect. Medical records were reviewed for these data.

RESULTS

Clinical evaluation and debridement findings of the abdomen revealed 4 patients with suspicious visceral damage. Laparotomy was performed in 4 cases, and revealed obvious lesion in 3 cases, including segmental necrosis of small intestine, partial necrosis of diaphragm, left liver and gastric wall, and greater omentum. Five patients underwent abdominal wall reconstruction using island retrograde latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap or free/island composite anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap. All flaps survived, abdominal bulging occurred in 3 cases after follow-up of 12 to 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical manifestations and wound features of abdomen collectively suggest a possible requirement of laparotomy for severe abdominal electrical burns. Retrograde latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap or composite anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap is an effective option for reconstruction of abdominal wall loss, the long-term complication of abdominal bulging, however, remains a significant clinical challenge.

Evaluation of polypropylene mesh coated with biological hydrogels for temporary closure of open abdomen

Polypropylene mesh, as a temporary abdominal closure device, may cause mechanical intestine injury and inflammatory response. Chitosan/gelatin hydrogel has excellent biocompatibility, soft and elastic properties. This work is to assess the effects of the chitosan/gelatin hydrogel coated polypropylene mesh on open abdomen wounds. Histological analysis and detection of healing-related factors were conducted to evaluate the inflammation and wound healing process. After 1-day implantation in a murine model of open abdomen, the coated polypropylene mesh, compared with simple polypropylene mesh, demonstrated well protection of the intestine serosa. After 14-day implantation, it reduced the inflammation response by down-regulating the cytokines interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α, and up-regulating the anti-inflammatory factor interleukin-10. Meanwhile, the composite stimulated granulation tissue growth, and promoted matrix deposition and angiogenesis after 7 and 14 days. In conclusion, the modified temporary abdominal closure composite could significantly protect the intestines from mechanical damage and accelerate wound healing.

Remodeling of Noncrosslinked Acellular Dermal Matrices in a Rabbit Model of Ventral Hernia Repair

Background: Bioprostheses represent a significant advance in the abdominal wall reconstruction since they become degraded until their complete elimination in the recipient organism. This study examines remodeling in the host of three noncrosslinked porcine dermal collagen biomeshes: Strattice™ (St; LifeCell Corp.), XCM Biologic® Tissue Matrix (XCM; Synthes CMF) and Protexa® (Pr; Deco Med S.R.L.). Methods: Partial ventral hernia defects created in New Zealand White rabbits were repaired using the biomeshes that were placed in an inlay, preperitoneal position. At 14 and 90 days after implantation, explants were assessed in terms of their host tissue incorporation by morphological studies, collagen gene/protein expression (quantitative real-time PCR/immunofluorescence), macrophage response (immunohistochemistry) and biomechanical strength. Results: There were no cases of mortality or infection. Among our macroscopic findings, the mesh detachment detected in one third of the Pr implants at 90 days was of note. The host tissue response to all the biomeshes was similar at both time points, with a tendency observed for their encapsulation. There were no appreciable signs of mesh degradation. The extent of host tissue infiltration and collagenization was greater for St and Pr than for XCM. Macrophages were observed in zones of inflammation and tissue infiltration inside the mesh. XCM showed a greater macrophage response at 90 days (p < 0.05). Improved tensile strength was observed for St (p < 0.05) over Pr and unrepaired defects. Conclusions:St showed the best behavior, featuring good collagenization and tensile strength while also inducing a minimal foreign body reaction.