Knee injuries in severe trauma patients: a trauma registry study in 3.458 patients

Development and Validation of Indicators for Population Injury Surveillance in Hong Kong: Development and Usability Study

BACKGROUND

Injury is an increasingly pressing global health issue. An effective surveillance system is required to monitor the trends and burden of injuries.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify a set of valid and context-specific injury indicators to facilitate the establishment of an injury surveillance program in Hong Kong.

METHODS

This development of indicators adopted a multiphased modified Delphi research design. A literature search was conducted on academic databases using injury-related search terms in various combinations. A list of potential indicators was sent to a panel of experts from various backgrounds to rate the validity and context-specificity of these indicators. Local hospital data on the selected core indicators were used to examine their applicability in the context of Hong Kong.

RESULTS

We reviewed 142 articles and identified 55 indicators, which were classified into 4 domains. On the basis of the ratings by the expert panel, 13 indicators were selected as core indicators because of their good validity and high relevance to the local context. Among these indicators, 10 were from the construct of health care service use, and 3 were from the construct of postdischarge outcomes. Regression analyses of local hospitalization data showed that the Hong Kong Safe Community certification status had no association with 5 core indicators (admission to intensive care unit, mortality rate, length of intensive care unit stay, need for a rehabilitation facility, and long-term behavioral and emotional outcomes), negative associations with 4 core indicators (operative intervention, infection rate, length of hospitalization, and disability-adjusted life years), and positive associations with the remaining 4 core indicators (attendance to accident and emergency department, discharge rate, suicide rate, and hospitalization rate after attending the accident and emergency department). These results confirmed the validity of the selected core indicators for the quantification of injury burden and evaluation of injury-related services, although some indicators may better measure the consequences of severe injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed a set of injury outcome indicators that would be useful for monitoring injury trends and burdens in Hong Kong.

Shoulder injuries in polytraumatized patients: an analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®

Background

The aim of the present study was to analyze the prevalence, epidemiology and relevance of shoulder injuries in polytraumatized patients in a large national trauma database.

We hypothesize a high prevalence of shoulder injuries in traffic accidents and a high prevalence of concomitant injuries of the thorax leading to an aggravated clinical course and higher Injury Severity Score (ISS). Furthermore, we hypothesize an increased rate of surgical treatment with the severity of the injury.

Materials and methods

The retrospective analysis is based on the database (2002–2013) of the TraumaRegister DGU® and includes statistical data from 608 hospitals. The severity of injuries and trauma were scaled using the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), and the Injury Severity Score (ISS), respectively. Patients with an ISS ≥ 16 were included in the study, and injuries were subdivided according to their anatomical involvement and analyzed with respect to the trauma mechanism and the resulting injuries.

Results

In this study, 54,076 cases of patients with an ISS ≥ 16 were analyzed. Shoulder injuries occurred in 15,115 patients (27.9%). Of these, 68.5% were caused by traffic accidents, especially in motorbike, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. We found more shoulder injuries in blunt trauma mechanisms. Moreover, patients with shoulder injuries spent on average 1.7 more days on the intensive care unit (ICU), or intermediate care unit (IMCU), according to the severity of the injury, and had longer overall hospital stays (26.2 vs. 24.1 days) than patients without shoulder injuries. The overall ISS was increased in patients with shoulder injuries, whereas an increase of mortality could not be identified. Concomitant thoracic injuries occurred significantly more often in patients with shoulder injuries (82.9% vs. 69.6%). Injuries of the abdomen, pelvis, and lower extremity showed no correlation with shoulder injuries, whereas head and spine injuries showed a significant correlation.

Conclusion

Shoulder injuries are very common in polytraumatized patients. Together with their distinctive concomitant injuries, they have an aggravating impact on the clinical progress. Our data confirm the correlation with thoracic injuries. Furthermore, we identified an increased risk of shoulder injuries in motorbike, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. An increase in mortality could not be identified.

Diagnostic and Management Strategies for Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Critical Analysis Review

Multiligament knee injuries have a strong association with periarticular soft-tissue and neurovascular injuries, which must not be overlooked in the initial evaluation of the patient. Even though magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is imperative for a complete evaluation of the damaged ligamentous knee restraints, stress radiography aids in establishing the functional consequence of the MRI findings and may assist in directing reconstruction. Although cruciate ligament tears are generally reconstructed, a combined repair-reconstruction approach is most useful for collateral ligaments and extra-articular structures, with incorporation of local tissue into the reconstruction whenever possible. Regardless of the timing and operative technique chosen, patients with multiligament knee injuries are at high risk for complications and long-term disability.

Increased Incidence of Vascular Injury in Obese Patients With Knee Dislocations

OBJECTIVES

With rising rates of obesity in the United States, the burden of knee dislocations in this population remains unknown. This national epidemiologic study was designed to analyze the association of obesity with closed knee dislocation and vascular complications.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The deidentified Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to access the US inpatient data from 2000 to 2012.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Patients with noncongenital closed knee dislocations were included. Examined variables included patient age, sex, vascular injury, and obesity status.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included hospital length of stay, amputation, and inpatient hospitalization charge.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2012, a total of 19,087 knee dislocations were identified, including 2265 in overweight/obese patients (11.9%). The annual incidence of knee dislocations reported in patients diagnosed as either obese or morbidly obese increased over the 13-year period (P < 0.0001). The overall average rate of vascular injury requiring intervention was 5.63%, whereas 7.2% of obese patients and 11.3% of morbidly obese patients with knee dislocations (P < 0.0001) sustained a vascular injury requiring intervention. The average length of stay and amputation rate for obese and morbidly obese patients who sustained a knee dislocation was not statistically different from nonobese patients when vascular injury was controlled. When patients with a vascular injury were excluded, obese and morbidly obese patients who sustained a knee dislocation had higher average cost of hospital stay than nonobese patients (P = 0.0262).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates significant increases in costs of stay with obese patients sustaining knee dislocations when compared with normal weight knee dislocation patients. Vascular injuries were found to be far more common in obese and morbidly obese patient groups than nonobese patients. Providers should be on high alert when managing knee dislocations in obese patients because a significant number require prompt vascular intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.