1
|
Ascrizzi S, Arillotta GM, Grillone K, Caridà G, Signorelli S, Ali A, Romeo C, Tassone P, Tagliaferri P. Lynch Syndrome Biopathology and Treatment: The Potential Role of microRNAs in Clinical Practice. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3930. [PMID: 37568746 PMCID: PMC10417124 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS), also known as Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC), is an autosomal dominant cancer syndrome which causes about 2-3% of cases of colorectal carcinoma. The development of LS is due to the genetic and epigenetic inactivation of genes involved in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system, causing an epiphenomenon known as microsatellite instability (MSI). Despite the fact that the genetics of the vast majority of MSI-positive (MSI+) cancers can be explained, the etiology of this specific subset is still poorly understood. As a possible new mechanism, it has been recently demonstrated that the overexpression of certain microRNAs (miRNAs, miRs), such as miR-155, miR-21, miR-137, can induce MSI or modulate the expression of the genes involved in LS pathogenesis. MiRNAs are small RNA molecules that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by playing a critical role in the modulation of key oncogenic pathways. Increasing evidence of the link between MSI and miRNAs in LS prompted a deeper investigation into the miRNome involved in these diseases. In this regard, in this study, we discuss the emerging role of miRNAs as crucial players in the onset and progression of LS as well as their potential use as disease biomarkers and therapeutic targets in the current view of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Ascrizzi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (S.A.); (G.M.A.); (K.G.); (G.C.); (S.S.); (A.A.); (C.R.); (P.T.)
| | - Grazia Maria Arillotta
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (S.A.); (G.M.A.); (K.G.); (G.C.); (S.S.); (A.A.); (C.R.); (P.T.)
| | - Katia Grillone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (S.A.); (G.M.A.); (K.G.); (G.C.); (S.S.); (A.A.); (C.R.); (P.T.)
| | - Giulio Caridà
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (S.A.); (G.M.A.); (K.G.); (G.C.); (S.S.); (A.A.); (C.R.); (P.T.)
| | - Stefania Signorelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (S.A.); (G.M.A.); (K.G.); (G.C.); (S.S.); (A.A.); (C.R.); (P.T.)
| | - Asad Ali
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (S.A.); (G.M.A.); (K.G.); (G.C.); (S.S.); (A.A.); (C.R.); (P.T.)
| | - Caterina Romeo
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (S.A.); (G.M.A.); (K.G.); (G.C.); (S.S.); (A.A.); (C.R.); (P.T.)
| | - Pierfrancesco Tassone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (S.A.); (G.M.A.); (K.G.); (G.C.); (S.S.); (A.A.); (C.R.); (P.T.)
- Medical Oncology and Translational Medical Oncology Units, University Hospital Renato Dulbecco, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Pierosandro Tagliaferri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (S.A.); (G.M.A.); (K.G.); (G.C.); (S.S.); (A.A.); (C.R.); (P.T.)
- Medical Oncology and Translational Medical Oncology Units, University Hospital Renato Dulbecco, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Colorectal Cancer in Younger Adults. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36:449-470. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
3
|
Susanti S, Wibowo S, Akbariani G, Yoshuantari N, Heriyanto DS, Ridwanuloh AM, Hariyatun H, Handaya AY, Kurnianda J, Hutajulu SH, Ilyas M. Molecular Analysis of Colorectal Cancers Suggests a High Frequency of Lynch Syndrome in Indonesia. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246245. [PMID: 34944866 PMCID: PMC8699188 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The incidence of young people <50 years old who are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC), termed as early onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), accounted for nearly 30% of the total CRC patients in Indonesia, which is about three times higher than what is being reported in Europe, the UK and USA. Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary type of CRC that is associated with a younger age of onset. Detecting LS has been long reported to be a cost-effective strategy to provide aid in the diagnosis or management of the individual or at-risk family members. The aim of this retrospective study was to screen for Lynch Syndrome in Indonesian CRC patients using simple and robust polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based molecular testing, known as N_LyST (Nottingham Lynch Syndrome Test). To our knowledge, we are the first to study and observe a potentially higher frequency of LS (13.85%) among CRC patients in Indonesia (n = 231). This may partially contribute to the reported much higher rate of EOCRC found in the country. Abstract There is about three times higher incidence of young patients <50 years old with colorectal cancer, termed EOCRC, in Indonesia as compared to Europe, the UK and USA. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of Lynch Syndrome (LS) in Indonesian CRC patients. The previously described Nottingham Lynch Syndrome Test (N_LyST) was used in this project. N_LyST is a robust high-resolution melting (HRM)-based test that has shown 100% concordance with standard reference methods, including capillary electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing. The test consisted of five mononucleotide microsatellite markers (BAT25, BAT26, BCAT25, MYB, EWSR1), BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 region C promoter for methylation (using bisulphite-modified DNA). A total of 231 archival (2016–2019) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour tissues from CRC patients collected from Dr. Sardjito General Hospital Yogyakarta, Indonesia, were successfully tested and analysed. Among those, 44/231 (19.05%) were MSI, 25/231 (10.82%) were harbouring BRAF V600E mutation and 6/231 (2.60%) had MLH1 promoter methylation. Almost all—186/197 (99.45%)—MSS cases were MLH1 promoter unmethylated, while there were only 5/44 (11.36%) MSI cases with MLH1 promoter methylation. Similarly, only 9/44 (20.45%) of MSI cases were BRAF mutant. There were 50/231 (21.65%) EOCRC cases, with 15/50 (30%) regarded as MSI, as opposed to 29/181 (16.02%) within the older group. In total, 32/231 patients (13.85%) were classified as “Probable Lynch” (MSI, BRAF wildtype and MLH1 promoter unmethylated), which were enriched in EOCRC as compared to older patients (24% vs. 11.05%, p = 0.035). Nonetheless, 30/50 (76.00%) cases among the EOCRC cases were non-LS (sporadic) and were significantly associated with a left-sided tumour. The overall survival of both “Probable Lynch” and non-LS (sporadic) groups (n = 227) was comparable (p = 0.59), with follow up period of 0–1845 days/61.5 months. Stage, node status, histological grading and ECOG score were significantly associated with patient overall survival (p < 0.005), yet only ECOG was an independent factor for OS (HR: 4.38; 95% CI: 1.72–11.2; p = 0.002). In summary, this study is the first to reveal a potentially higher frequency of LS among CRC patients in Indonesia, which may partially contribute to the reported much higher number of EOCRC as compared to the incidence in the West.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanti Susanti
- Molecular Pathology Research Group, Academic Unit of Translational Medical Science, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG72UH, UK;
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Jawa Tengah 53182, Indonesia
- PathGen Diagnostik Teknologi, Center for Innovation and Utilization of Science and Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional/BRIN), Bogor 16911, Indonesia; (S.W.); (G.A.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Satrio Wibowo
- PathGen Diagnostik Teknologi, Center for Innovation and Utilization of Science and Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional/BRIN), Bogor 16911, Indonesia; (S.W.); (G.A.)
| | - Gilang Akbariani
- PathGen Diagnostik Teknologi, Center for Innovation and Utilization of Science and Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional/BRIN), Bogor 16911, Indonesia; (S.W.); (G.A.)
| | - Naomi Yoshuantari
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia; (N.Y.); (D.S.H.)
| | - Didik Setyo Heriyanto
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia; (N.Y.); (D.S.H.)
| | - Asep Muhamad Ridwanuloh
- Research Center for Biotechnology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor 16911, Indonesia; (A.M.R.); (H.H.)
| | - Hariyatun Hariyatun
- Research Center for Biotechnology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor 16911, Indonesia; (A.M.R.); (H.H.)
| | - Adeodatus Yuda Handaya
- Division of Digestive Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia;
| | - Johan Kurnianda
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia; (J.K.); (S.H.H.)
| | - Susanna Hilda Hutajulu
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia; (J.K.); (S.H.H.)
| | - Mohammad Ilyas
- Molecular Pathology Research Group, Academic Unit of Translational Medical Science, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG72UH, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Toh JWT, Phan K, Reza F, Chapuis P, Spring KJ. Rate of dissemination and prognosis in early and advanced stage colorectal cancer based on microsatellite instability status: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:1573-1596. [PMID: 33604737 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03874-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For the past two decades, microsatellite instability (MSI) has been reported as a robust clinical biomarker associated with survival advantage attributed to its immunogenicity. However, MSI is also associated with high-risk adverse pathological features (poorly differentiated, mucinous, signet cell, higher grade) and exhibits a double-edged sword phenomenon. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the rate of dissemination and the prognosis of early and advanced stage colorectal cancer based on MSI status. METHODS A systematic literature search of original studies was performed on Ovid searching MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, American College of Physicians ACP Journal Club, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects DARE, Clinical Trials databases from inception of database to June 2019. Colorectal cancer, microsatellite instability, genomic instability and DNA mismatch repair were used as key words or MeSH terms. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed. Data were pooled using a random-effects model with odds ratio (OR) as the effect size. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan ver 5.3 Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS From 5288 studies, 136 met the inclusion criteria (n = 92,035; MSI-H 11,746 (13%)). Overall, MSI-H was associated with improved OS (OR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.90), DFS (OR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.66-0.81) and DSS (OR, 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.90). Importantly, MSI-H had a protective effect against dissemination with a significantly lower rate of lymph node and distant metastases. By stage, the protective effect of MSI-H in terms of OS and DFS was observed clearly in stage II and stage III. Survival in stage I CRC was excellent irrespective of MSI status. In stage IV CRC, without immunotherapy, MSI-H was not associated with any survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS MSI-H CRC was associated with an overall survival benefit with a lower rate of dissemination. Survival benefit was clearly evident in both stage II and III CRC, but MSI-H was neither a robust prognostic marker in stage I nor stage IV CRC without immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W T Toh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Discipline of Surgery, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Medical Oncology, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, School of Medicine Western Sydney University and South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Kevin Phan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Faizur Reza
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Pierre Chapuis
- Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kevin J Spring
- Medical Oncology, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, School of Medicine Western Sydney University and South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arif AA, Chahal D, Ladua GK, Bhang E, Salh B, Rosenfeld G, Loree JM, Donnellan F. Hereditary and Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Related Early Onset Colorectal Cancer Have Unique Characteristics and Clinical Course Compared with Sporadic Disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:1785-1791. [PMID: 34301727 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early onset colorectal cancer (EoCRC), diagnosed in those <50 years old, is increasing in incidence. We sought to differentiate characteristics and outcomes of EoCRC in patients with sporadic disease or preexisting conditions. METHODS We evaluated 2,135 patients with EoCRC in a population-based cohort from the Canadian province of British Columbia. Patients were identified on the basis of presence of hereditary syndromes (n = 146) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; n = 87) and compared with patients with sporadic EoCRC (n = 1,902). RESULTS Proportions of patients with preexisting conditions were highest in the youngest decile of 18-29 (34.3%, P < 0.0001). Patients with sporadic EoCRC were older, more likely female, and had increased BMI (P < 0.05). IBD-related EoCRC had the highest rates of metastatic disease, poor differentiation, adverse histology, lymphovascular, and perineural invasion (P < 0.05). Survival was lower in patients with IBD (HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.54-3.13; P < 0.0001) and higher in hereditary EoCRC (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.45-0.73; P < 0.0001) compared with sporadic. Prognosis did not differ between ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease but was lower in those with undifferentiated-IBD (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.01-4.05; P = 0.049). Lynch syndrome EoCRC had improved survival over familial adenomatous polyposis (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.054-0.57; P = 0.0037) and other syndromes (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.11-0.99; P = 0.049). In multivariate analysis controlling for prognostic factors, hereditary EoCRC was unchanged from sporadic; however, IBD-related EoCRC had worse overall survival (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.55-3.16; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS EoCRC is heterogenous and patients with preexisting conditions have different characteristics and outcomes compared with sporadic disease. IMPACT Prognostic differences identified here for young patients with colorectal cancer and predisposing conditions may help facilitate treatment planning and patient counseling.See related commentary by Hayes, p. xxx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arif A Arif
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Daljeet Chahal
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gale K Ladua
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eric Bhang
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Bill Salh
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Greg Rosenfeld
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jonathan M Loree
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Fergal Donnellan
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheng E, Blackburn HN, Ng K, Spiegelman D, Irwin ML, Ma X, Gross CP, Tabung FK, Giovannucci EL, Kunz PL, Llor X, Billingsley K, Meyerhardt JA, Ahuja N, Fuchs CS. Analysis of Survival Among Adults With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the National Cancer Database. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2112539. [PMID: 34132794 PMCID: PMC8209612 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE While increased adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines in the US has been associated with significant reductions in cancer incidence in US individuals aged 50 years and older, the incidence of CRC among those aged younger than 50 years has been steadily increasing. Understanding the survival among individuals with early-onset CRC compared with those aged 50 years and older is fundamental to informing treatment approaches and understanding the unique biological distinctiveness within early-onset CRC. OBJECTIVE To characterize the overall survival for individuals with early-onset CRC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database. Included individuals were ages 0 to 90 years and diagnosed with primary CRC from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2015. Individuals diagnosed at ages 51 through 55 years were selected as the reference group and defined as later-onset CRC for this study. Individuals diagnosed at age 50 years were excluded to minimize an apparent screening detection bias at that age in our population, given that these individuals disproportionately presented with earlier stage. All statistical analyses were conducted from January 4, 2020, through December 26, 2020. EXPOSURES Early-onset CRC was defined as age younger than 50 years at diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Overall survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Among 769 871 individuals with CRC (377 890 [49.1%] women; 636 791 White individuals [82.7%]), 353 989 individuals (46.0%) died (median [range] follow-up: 2.9 [0-14.0] years), 102 168 individuals (13.3%) had early-onset CRC, and 78 812 individuals (10.2%) had later-onset CRC. Individuals with early-onset CRC, compared with those diagnosed with CRC at ages 51 through 55 years, had a lower 10-year survival rate (53.6% [95% CI, 53.2%-54.0%] vs 54.3% [95% CI, 53.8%-54.8%]; P < .001) in unadjusted analysis. However, after adjustment for other factors associated with mortality, most notably stage, individuals with early-onset CRC had a lower risk of death compared with individuals diagnosed from ages 51 through 55 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93-0.96]; P < .001). In the model adjusted for stage, the HR for individuals with early-onset CRC was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.88-0.90; P < .001). The survival advantage was greatest for individuals diagnosed at ages 35 through 39 years (adjusted HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.92]; P < .001) and stages I (adjusted HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81-0.93]; P < .001) and II (adjusted HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.90]; P < .001) and was absent among those diagnosed at ages 25 years or younger and stages III through IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that there is a survival benefit for individuals with early-onset CRC compared with those diagnosed with CRC at later ages. Further study is needed to understand the underlying heterogeneity of survival among individuals with early-onset CRC by age and stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- En Cheng
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Donna Spiegelman
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Melinda L. Irwin
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Xiaomei Ma
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Cary P. Gross
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Fred K. Tabung
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Edward L. Giovannucci
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pamela L. Kunz
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Xavier Llor
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Kevin Billingsley
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Nita Ahuja
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Charles S. Fuchs
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pesola F, Eloranta S, Martling A, Saraste D, Smedby KE. Family history of colorectal cancer and survival: a Swedish population-based study. J Intern Med 2020; 287:723-733. [PMID: 32012369 PMCID: PMC7318575 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) is an established risk factor for developing CRC, whilst the impact of family history on prognosis is unclear. The present study assessed the association between family history and prognosis and, based on current evidence, explored whether this association was modified by age at diagnosis. METHODS Using data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR) linked with the Multigeneration Register and the National Cancer Register, we identified 31 801 patients with a CRC diagnosed between 2007 and 2016. The SCRCR is a clinically rich database which includes information on the cancer stage, grade, location, treatment, complications and postoperative follow-up. RESULTS We estimated excess mortality rate ratios (EMRR) for relative survival and hazard ratios (HR) for disease-free survival with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using flexible parametric models. We found no association between family history and relative survival (EMRR = 0.96, 95% CIs: 0.89-1.03, P = 0.21) or disease-free survival (HR = 0.98, 95% CIs: 0.91-1.06, P = 0.64). However, age was found to modify the impact of family history on prognosis. Young patients (<50 at diagnosis) with a positive family history had less advanced (i.e. stages I and II) cancers than those with no family history (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56-0.89, P = 0.004) and lower excess mortality even after adjusting for cancer stage (EMMR = 0.63, 95% CIs: 0.47-0.84, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that young individuals with a family history of CRC may have greater health awareness, attend opportunistic screening and adopt lifestyle changes, leading to earlier diagnosis and better prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. Pesola
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - S. Eloranta
- Department of Medicine SolnaDivision of Clinical EpidemiologyKarolinska Institutet and Karolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - A. Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - D. Saraste
- Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - K. E. Smedby
- Department of Medicine SolnaDivision of Clinical EpidemiologyKarolinska Institutet and Karolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Novel MLH1 Initiation Codon Mutation (c.3G>T) in a Large Chinese Lynch Syndrome Family with Different Onset Age and mRNA Expression Level. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:1460835. [PMID: 30539002 PMCID: PMC6261076 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1460835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome is a genetically and clinically heterogeneous disorder; it is caused by a germline mutation in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Individuals with a heterozygous mutation in MLH1 have an increased risk for developing colorectal cancer. Here we described a 5-generation Chinese Lynch syndrome family with different severity and onset age. A novel heterozygous germline mutation (c.3G>T, p.Met1Ile) in MLH1 gene was discovered by next generation sequencing. Our study also revealed by qPCR that the MLH1 mRNA expression in peripheral blood of patients in this family was remarkably lower than that of the unaffected carriers and non-carriers. The research results indicated that the mRNA expression level may provide predictive suggestions of treatment and management for carriers with the initiation codon mutation of MLH1 in this family. Further studies are undertaken in this family as well as other families with Lynch syndrome to interrogate the exact reasons affecting the MLH1 mRNA expression level and whether mRNA expression in peripheral blood could be a significant factor for early diagnosis and surveillance of Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
|
9
|
Seth S, Ager A, Arends MJ, Frayling IM. Lynch syndrome - cancer pathways, heterogeneity and immune escape. J Pathol 2018; 246:129-133. [PMID: 30027543 DOI: 10.1002/path.5139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Revised: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Recent work has provided evidence for genetic and molecular heterogeneity in colorectal cancers (CRCs) arising in patients with Lynch syndrome (LS), dividing these into two groups: G1 and G2. In terms of mutation and gene expression profile, G1 CRCs bear resemblance to sporadic CRCs with microsatellite instability (MSI), whereas G2 CRCs are more similar to microsatellite-stable CRCs. Here we review the current state of knowledge on pathways of precursor progression to CRC in LS and how these might tie in with the new findings. Immunotherapies are an active field of research for MSI cancers and their potential use for cancer therapy for both sporadic and LS MSI cancers is discussed. Copyright © 2018 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidhant Seth
- University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ann Ager
- Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, and Systems Immunity Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mark J Arends
- Division of Pathology, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ian M Frayling
- Institute of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Danys D, Stratilatovas E, Cereska V, Poskus T. Lynch syndrome and sextuple primary malignancies. Acta Chir Belg 2018; 118:326-330. [PMID: 28938854 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2017.1379801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is the most common of hereditary colorectal cancer and accounts for 1-3%. Lynch and Chapelle estimated that it accounts 5-8% for all colorectal cancers. It is an autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by predisposition of various cancers (colorectal, stomach, endometrial, ovarian, renal, small bowel, and hepatobiliary tract) at earlier age than in general population and occurs as a result of mutation in DNA mismatch repair genes. This article presents a rare clinical of a 61-year-old female diagnosed with extracolonic Lynch syndrome with six metachronous tumours acquiring in digestive tract during the period from 1993 to 2014 (over 21 years). No other cases of six primary malignancies in patient with Lynch syndrome have been reported in literature. Upon diagnosis of Lynch syndrome, it is important to screen patient for malignancies of different localization as this syndrome predisposes appearance of various cancers at earlier age than in general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donatas Danys
- Center of Abdominal Surgery, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Eugenijus Stratilatovas
- Center of Abdominal Surgery, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Tomas Poskus
- Center of Abdominal Surgery, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim SR, Pina A, Albert A, McAlpine J, Wolber R, Blake Gilks C, Kwon JS. Does MMR status in endometrial cancer influence response to adjuvant therapy? Gynecol Oncol 2018; 151:76-81. [PMID: 30172479 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Revised: 08/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency occurs in 20-40% of endometrial cancers but its therapeutic implication remains uncertain. Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes after adjuvant therapy between MMR deficient and proficient endometrial cancers from a population-based study. METHODS This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all endometrial cancers from the Vancouver Coastal Health authority region from 2011 to 2016, for which adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) was administered. Primary outcome measure was recurrence rates, expressed per 100 person-years (p100 py). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests, and covariates were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS There were 535 patients who received adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy), including 162 (30.3%) and 373 (69.7%) with MMR-deficient and proficient tumors, respectively. Demographic variables were similar except MMR-deficient patients were younger (62.0 vs. 64.8, p = 0.01). Patients with MMR-deficient tumors were more likely to have endometrioid histotype (85.8% vs. 61.4%), more likely to have Stage I disease (62.3% vs 54.7%), and LVSI (65.4% vs. 53.4%) compared to those with MMR-proficient tumors. There was a trend for MMR-proficient group to have higher recurrence rates (10.7 p100 py vs 5.9 p100 py) and MMR deficiency was associated with better OS and PFS, but on multivariable analysis, MMR status was no longer significant. CONCLUSION Women with MMR-deficient endometrial cancers who receive adjuvant therapy have a lower rate of recurrence compared to those with MMR-proficient cancers. However, on multivariable analysis, MMR status does not remain associated with differences in PFS or OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soyoun Rachel Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Annick Pina
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Arianne Albert
- Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jessica McAlpine
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Robert Wolber
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - C Blake Gilks
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Janice S Kwon
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Distribution of a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 in Colorectal Cancer Patients and Its Association with Mucinous Adenocarcinoma. Int J Biol Markers 2018. [DOI: 10.5301/jbm.2010.6119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To analyze the difference in the distribution of an insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) polymorphism (-2995 C/A) between young and old colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Methods Information from 950 CRC patients undergoing surgery at the Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 2000 and 2005 was collected. The IGF-1 polymorphism was analyzed in patients in extreme age ranges at the time of CRC onset (i.e., under the 20th and above the 80th percentiles, respectively). Associations between clinicopathological variables and the IGF-1 polymorphism were analyzed. Results Young CRC patients had a higher frequency of advanced disease (58.7%) and mucinous adenocarcinoma (20%) than old CRC patients. Among old CRC patients, the frequency of the AA genotype of IGF-1 was 12.7% (24/189), which was significantly higher than in young patients (4.2%). Other clinicopathological factors including tumor location, differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and TNM stage were not associated with the AA genotype of IGF-1. Mucinous differentiation (but not the other clinicopathological factors) was significantly associated with the CA/AA genotype of IGF-1 (39/195). Conclusions Older patients had a higher frequency of the AA genotype of IGF-1(-2995 C/A), while younger patients more often had advanced disease and mucinous adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
13
|
Safdari R, Maserat E, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Javan Amoli AH, Mohaghegh Shalmani H. Person centered prediction of survival in population based screening program by an intelligent clinical decision support system. GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY FROM BED TO BENCH 2017; 10:60-65. [PMID: 28331566 PMCID: PMC5346826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM To survey person centered survival rate in population based screening program by an intelligent clinical decision support system. BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is the most common malignancy and major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Colorectal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer death in Iran. In this survey, we used cosine similarity as data mining technique and intelligent system for estimating survival of at risk groups in the screening plan. METHODS In the first step, we determined minimum data set (MDS). MDS was approved by experts and reviewing literatures. In the second step, MDS were coded by python language and matched with cosine similarity formula. Finally, survival rate by percent was illustrated in the user interface of national intelligent system. The national intelligent system was designed in PyCharm environment. RESULTS Main data elements of intelligent system consist demographic information, age, referral type, risk group, recommendation and survival rate. Minimum data set related to survival comprise of clinical status, past medical history and socio-demographic information. Information of the covered population as a comprehensive database was connected to intelligent system and survival rate estimated for each patient. Mean range of survival of HNPCC patients and FAP patients were respectively 77.7% and 75.1%. Also, the mean range of the survival rate and other calculations have changed with the entry of new patients in the CRC registry by real-time. CONCLUSION National intelligent system monitors the entire of risk group and reports survival rates by electronic guidelines and data mining technique and also operates according to the clinical process. This web base software has a critical role in the estimation survival rate in order to health care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Safdari
- Allied Medical Sciences School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Elham Maserat
- School of Management and Medical informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei
- Basic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Hamid Mohaghegh Shalmani
- Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
McMeekin DS, Tritchler DL, Cohn DE, Mutch DG, Lankes HA, Geller MA, Powell MA, Backes FJ, Landrum LM, Zaino R, Broaddus RD, Ramirez N, Gao F, Ali S, Darcy KM, Pearl ML, DiSilvestro PA, Lele SB, Goodfellow PJ. Clinicopathologic Significance of Mismatch Repair Defects in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:3062-8. [PMID: 27325856 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.67.8722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The clinicopathologic significance of mismatch repair (MMR) defects in endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) has not been definitively established. We undertook tumor typing to classify MMR defects to determine if MMR status is prognostic or predictive. METHODS Primary EECs from NRG/GOG0210 patients were assessed for microsatellite instability (MSI), MLH1 methylation, and MMR protein expression. Each tumor was assigned to one of four MMR classes: normal, epigenetic defect, probable mutation (MMR defect not attributable to MLH1 methylation), or MSI-low. The relationships between MMR classes and clinicopathologic variables were assessed using contingency table tests and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS A total of 1,024 tumors were assigned to MMR classes. Epigenetic and probable mutations in MMR were significantly associated with higher grade and more frequent lymphovascular space invasion. Epigenetic defects were more common in patients with higher International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage. Overall, there were no differences in outcomes. Progression-free survival was, however, worse for women whose tumors had epigenetic MMR defects compared with the MMR normal group (hazard ratio, 1.37; P < .05; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.86). An exploratory analysis of interaction between MMR status and adjuvant therapy showed a trend toward improved progression-free survival for probable MMR mutation cases. CONCLUSION MMR defects in EECs are associated with a number of well-established poor prognostic indicators. Women with tumors that had MMR defects were likely to have higher-grade cancers and more frequent lymphovascular space invasion. Surprisingly, outcomes in these patients were similar to patients with MMR normal tumors, suggesting that MMR defects may counteract the effects of negative prognostic factors. Altered immune surveillance of MMR-deficient tumors, and other host/tumor interactions, is likely to determine outcomes for patients with MMR-deficient tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Scott McMeekin
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - David L Tritchler
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - David E Cohn
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - David G Mutch
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Heather A Lankes
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Melissa A Geller
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Matthew A Powell
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Floor J Backes
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Lisa M Landrum
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Richard Zaino
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Russell D Broaddus
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Nilsa Ramirez
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Feng Gao
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Shamshad Ali
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Kathleen M Darcy
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Michael L Pearl
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Paul A DiSilvestro
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Shashikant B Lele
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Paul J Goodfellow
- D. Scott McMeekin and Lisa M. Landrum, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; David L. Tritchler, Heather A. Lankes, and Shamshad Ali, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center; Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Michael L. Pearl, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; David E. Cohn, Floor J. Backes, and Paul J. Goodfellow, The Ohio State University; Nilsa Ramirez, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, and Feng Gao, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Melissa A. Geller, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Richard Zaino, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Russell D. Broaddus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Kathleen M. Darcy, Women's Health Integrated Research Collective, Annandale, VA; and Paul A. DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zeinalian M, Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori M, Akbarpour MJ, Emami MH. Epidemioclinical Feature of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer at-Risk for Lynch Syndrome in Central Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016; 16:4647-52. [PMID: 26107218 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.11.4647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is becoming one of the most complicated challenges of human health, particularly in developing countries like Iran. In this paper, we try to characterize CRC cases diagnosed < age 50 at-risk for Lynch syndrome within central Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS We designed a descriptive retrospective study to screen all registered CRC patients within 2000-2013 in Poursina Hakim Research Center (PHRC), a referral gastroenterology clinic in central Iran, based on being early-onset (age at diagnosis ≤50 years) and Amsterdam II criteria. We calculated frequencies and percentages by SPSS 19 software to describe clinical and family history characteristics of patients with early-onset CRC. RESULTS Overall 1,659 CRC patients were included in our study of which 413 (24.9%) were ≤50 years at diagnosis. Of 219/413 successful calls 67 persons (30.6%) were reported deceased. Family history was positive for 72/219 probands (32.9%) and 53 families (24.2%) were identified as familial colorectal cancer (FCC), with a history of at-least three affected members with any type of cancer in the family, of which 85% fulfilled the Amsterdam II Criteria as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families (45/219 or 20.5%). Finally, 14 families were excluded due to proband tumor tissues being unavailable or unwillingness for incorporation. The most common HNPCC-associated extracolonic- cancer among both males and females of the families was stomach, at respectively 31.8 and 32.7 percent. The most common tumor locations among the 31 probands were rectum (32.3%), sigmoid (29.0%), and ascending colon (12.9%). CONCLUSIONS Given the high prevalence of FCC (~1/4 of early-onset Iranian CRC patients), it is necessary to establish a comprehensive cancer genetic counseling and systematic screening program for early detection and to improve cancer prognosis among high risk families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehrdad Zeinalian
- Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran E-mail :
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Snowsill T, Huxley N, Hoyle M, Jones-Hughes T, Coelho H, Cooper C, Frayling I, Hyde C. A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome. Health Technol Assess 2015; 18:1-406. [PMID: 25244061 DOI: 10.3310/hta18580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited autosomal dominant disorder characterised by an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and other cancers, and caused by mutations in the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) mismatch repair genes. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of strategies to identify LS in newly diagnosed early-onset CRC patients (aged < 50 years). Cascade testing of relatives is employed in all strategies for individuals in whom LS is identified. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS Systematic reviews were conducted of the test accuracy of microsatellite instability (MSI) testing or immunohistochemistry (IHC) in individuals with CRC at risk of LS, and of economic evidence relating to diagnostic strategies for LS. Reviews were carried out in April 2012 (test accuracy); and in February 2012, repeated in February 2013 (economic evaluations). Databases searched included MEDLINE (1946 to April week 3, 2012), EMBASE (1980 to week 17, 2012) and Web of Science (inception to 30 April 2012), and risk of bias for test accuracy was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) quality appraisal tool. A de novo economic model of diagnostic strategies for LS was developed. RESULTS Inconsistencies in study designs precluded pooling of diagnostic test accuracy results from a previous systematic review and nine subsequent primary studies. These were of mixed quality, with significant methodological concerns identified for most. IHC and MSI can both play a part in diagnosing LS but neither is gold standard. No UK studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of diagnosing and managing LS, although studies from other countries generally found some strategies to be cost-effective compared with no testing. The de novo model demonstrated that all strategies were cost-effective compared with no testing at a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), with the most cost-effective strategy utilising MSI and BRAF testing [incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) = £5491 per QALY]. The maximum health benefit to the population of interest would be obtained using universal germline testing, but this would not be a cost-effective use of NHS resources compared with the next best strategy. When the age limit was raised from 50 to 60 and 70 years, the ICERs compared with no testing increased but remained below £20,000 per QALY (except for universal germline testing with an age limit of 70 years). The total net health benefit increased with the age limit as more individuals with LS were identified. Uncertainty was evaluated through univariate sensitivity analyses, which suggested that the parameters substantially affecting cost-effectiveness: were the risk of CRC for individuals with LS; the average number of relatives identified per index patient; the effectiveness of colonoscopy in preventing metachronous CRC; the cost of colonoscopy; the duration of the psychological impact of genetic testing on health-related quality of life (HRQoL); and the impact of prophylactic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on HRQoL (this had the potential to make all testing strategies more expensive and less effective than no testing). LIMITATIONS The absence of high-quality data for the impact of prophylactic gynaecological surgery and the psychological impact of genetic testing on HRQoL is an acknowledged limitation. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that reflex testing for LS in newly diagnosed CRC patients aged < 50 years is cost-effective. Such testing may also be cost-effective in newly diagnosed CRC patients aged < 60 or < 70 years. Results are subject to uncertainty due to a number of parameters, for some of which good estimates were not identified. We recommend future research to estimate the cost-effectiveness of testing for LS in individuals with newly diagnosed endometrial or ovarian cancer, and the inclusion of aspirin chemoprevention. Further research is required to accurately estimate the impact of interventions on HRQoL. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42012002436. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan Snowsill
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicola Huxley
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Martin Hoyle
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Tracey Jones-Hughes
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Helen Coelho
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Cooper
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Ian Frayling
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Chris Hyde
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lourensz K, Jones I. Considerations and management of a patient with three metachronous cancers in association with Lynch syndrome and ileal Crohn's disease: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015; 10:73-5. [PMID: 25805613 PMCID: PMC4430090 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2015] [Accepted: 03/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe a patient with three metachronous tumors in association with Lynch syndrome and ileal Crohn’s disease. Surgical management strategies need to be carefully considered and individualized to ensure the best oncologic and functional outcome for the patient. A sound knowledge of the clinical features of Lynch syndrome is critical to ensure adequate surveillance for early detection of anticipated neoplasms. The use of immunosuppressive drugs in the medical management of Crohn’s disease needs to be undertaken with the knowledge that such drugs might have an impact on oncologic outcome.
Introduction Lynch syndrome and Crohn’s disease are two entirely separate conditions but each have major gastrointestinal characteristics and carry a substantial increase in the risk of intestinal malignancy. Their co-existence in the patient who is the subject of this report dictated the need for an individualised treatment plan to deal with both conditions adequately. Presentation of case We report a case of a 51 year old female with a past medical history that includes Lynch syndrome and small bowel Crohn’s disease. Over a period of fifteen months, she developed three separate primary metachronous tumors in her endometrium, colon and duodenum. Discussion A patient with a combination of Lynch syndrome and ileal Crohn’s disease presents significant therapeutic implications that are not usually present when these conditions are treated in isolation. Conclusion The surgical treatment of patients with Lynch syndrome requires a sound knowledge of the possible neoplastic conditions that can arise in the syndrome. Early detection is paramount, either by implementation of evidence based surveillance programs or at least by a heightened clinical awareness of the features of this disease. Ideally this will result in both reduced surgical morbidity and improved oncologic outcome. Furthermore, the medical treatment of Crohn’s disease in a patient with tumors arising from Lynch syndrome must be undertaken with at least a consideration of the possibility that the use of immunosuppressive medication might increase the risk of cancer recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaleb Lourensz
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia.
| | - Ian Jones
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia; Clinical Professorial Fellow, Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schlussel AT, Gagliano RA, Seto-Donlon S, Eggerding F, Donlon T, Berenberg J, Lynch HT. The evolution of colorectal cancer genetics-Part 2: clinical implications and applications. J Gastrointest Oncol 2014; 5:336-44. [PMID: 25276406 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2014.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2014] [Accepted: 07/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The genetic understanding of colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to grow, and it is now estimated that 10% of the population has a known hereditary CRC syndrome. This article will examine the evolving surgical and medical management of hereditary CRC syndromes, and the impact of tumor genetics on therapy. This review will focus on the most common hereditary CRC-prone diseases seen in clinical practice, which include Lynch syndrome (LS), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) & attenuated FAP (AFAP), MutYH-associated polyposis (MAP), and serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS). Each section will review the current recommendations in the evaluation and treatment of these syndromes, as well as review surgical management and operative planning. A highly detailed multigeneration cancer family history with verified genealogy and pathology documentation whenever possible, coupled with germline mutation testing when indicated, is critically important to management decisions. Although caring for patients with these syndromes remains complex, the application of this knowledge facilitates better treatment of both individuals and their affected family members for generations to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew T Schlussel
- 1 Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 2 University of Arizona Cancer Center at Dignity Health-St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA ; 3 Genetics Laboratory, Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, CA, USA ; 4 Ohana Genetics, Inc., Honolulu, HI, USA ; 5 Department of Cell & Molecular Biology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 6 Department of Oncology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 7 Hereditary Cancer Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Ronald A Gagliano
- 1 Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 2 University of Arizona Cancer Center at Dignity Health-St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA ; 3 Genetics Laboratory, Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, CA, USA ; 4 Ohana Genetics, Inc., Honolulu, HI, USA ; 5 Department of Cell & Molecular Biology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 6 Department of Oncology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 7 Hereditary Cancer Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Susan Seto-Donlon
- 1 Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 2 University of Arizona Cancer Center at Dignity Health-St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA ; 3 Genetics Laboratory, Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, CA, USA ; 4 Ohana Genetics, Inc., Honolulu, HI, USA ; 5 Department of Cell & Molecular Biology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 6 Department of Oncology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 7 Hereditary Cancer Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Faye Eggerding
- 1 Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 2 University of Arizona Cancer Center at Dignity Health-St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA ; 3 Genetics Laboratory, Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, CA, USA ; 4 Ohana Genetics, Inc., Honolulu, HI, USA ; 5 Department of Cell & Molecular Biology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 6 Department of Oncology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 7 Hereditary Cancer Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Timothy Donlon
- 1 Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 2 University of Arizona Cancer Center at Dignity Health-St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA ; 3 Genetics Laboratory, Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, CA, USA ; 4 Ohana Genetics, Inc., Honolulu, HI, USA ; 5 Department of Cell & Molecular Biology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 6 Department of Oncology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 7 Hereditary Cancer Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Jeffrey Berenberg
- 1 Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 2 University of Arizona Cancer Center at Dignity Health-St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA ; 3 Genetics Laboratory, Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, CA, USA ; 4 Ohana Genetics, Inc., Honolulu, HI, USA ; 5 Department of Cell & Molecular Biology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 6 Department of Oncology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 7 Hereditary Cancer Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Henry T Lynch
- 1 Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 2 University of Arizona Cancer Center at Dignity Health-St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA ; 3 Genetics Laboratory, Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, CA, USA ; 4 Ohana Genetics, Inc., Honolulu, HI, USA ; 5 Department of Cell & Molecular Biology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 6 Department of Oncology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA ; 7 Hereditary Cancer Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cohen SA, Leininger A. The genetic basis of Lynch syndrome and its implications for clinical practice and risk management. APPLICATION OF CLINICAL GENETICS 2014; 7:147-58. [PMID: 25161364 PMCID: PMC4142571 DOI: 10.2147/tacg.s51483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome is the most common cause of hereditary colon cancer, and accounts for as much as 3% of all colon and endometrial cancers. The identification and management of individuals with Lynch syndrome have evolved over the past 20 years, yet the syndrome remains vastly underdiagnosed. It is important for clinicians to recognize individuals and families who are at risk in order to be able to manage them appropriately and reduce their morbidity and mortality from this condition. This review will touch on the history of Lynch syndrome, the current knowledge of genotype–phenotype correlations, the cancers associated with Lynch syndrome, and management of individuals who are gene carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Cohen
- Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment Program, St Vincent Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lee SD, Kim BC, Han KS, Hong CW, Sohn DK, Park JW, Park SC, Kim SY, Baek JY, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Oh JH. Influence of family history on survival in patients with colon and rectal cancer. J Dig Dis 2014; 15:108-15. [PMID: 24304621 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to investigate the association between a family history (FH) of colorectal cancer (CRC) and cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III CRC. METHODS From April 2001 to December 2007, 1102 patients with stage III CRC were enrolled and their data including FH, clinicopathological characteristics of the tumor were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Of 971 patients that were finally enrolled, 63 (6.5%) reported CRC in at least one first-degree relative. Death occurred in 12.7% of the CRC patients with an FH and 21.8% in those without an FH. A multivariate analysis showed that patients with an FH of CRC, compared with those without FH, had an adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of 0.674 (P = 0.281) for overall survival (OS) and 0.672 (P = 0.220) for disease-free survival (DFS). However, the location of tumor, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, tumor invasion (T) stage and lymph node (N) metastasis significantly affected OS and DFS. Furthermore, whereas the FH of CRC patients was associated with a favorable prognosis in stage III colon cancer (HR 0.224, P = 0.040) but not in rectal cancer (HR 1.225, P = 0.640). CONCLUSIONS In patients with stage III CRC, tumor location (especially in the rectum), a high preoperative CEA level and advanced T and N stages indicate a poor prognosis. However, in stage III colon cancer FH is associated with improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong Dae Lee
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Colon and rectal cancer survival by tumor location and microsatellite instability: the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56:937-44. [PMID: 23838861 PMCID: PMC3708260 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0b013e31828f9a57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancers in the proximal colon, distal colon, and rectum are frequently studied together; however, there are biological differences in cancers across these sites, particularly in the prevalence of microsatellite instability. OBJECTIVE We assessed the differences in survival by colon or rectal cancer site, considering the contribution of microsatellite instability to such differences. DESIGN This is a population-based prospective cohort study for cancer survival. SETTINGS This study was conducted within the Colon Cancer Family Registry, an international consortium. Participants were identified from population-based cancer registries in the United States, Canada, and Australia. PATIENTS Information on tumor site, microsatellite instability, and survival after diagnosis was available for 3284 men and women diagnosed with incident invasive colon or rectal cancer between 1997 and 2002, with ages at diagnosis ranging from 18 to 74. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios for the association between all-cause mortality and tumor location, overall and by microsatellite instability status. RESULTS Distal colon (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49-0.71) and rectal cancers (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57-0.81) were associated with lower mortality than proximal colon cancer overall. Compared specifically with patients with proximal colon cancer exhibiting no/low microsatellite instability, patients with distal colon and rectal cancers experienced lower mortality, regardless of microsatellite instability status; patients with proximal colon cancer exhibiting high microsatellite instability had the lowest mortality. LIMITATIONS Study limitations include the absence of stage at diagnosis and cause-of-death information for all but a subset of study participants. Some patient groups defined jointly by tumor site and microsatellite instability status are subject to small numbers. CONCLUSION Proximal colon cancer survival differs from survival for distal colon and rectal cancer in a manner apparently dependent on microsatellite instability status. These findings support the premise that proximal colon, distal colon, and rectal cancers are clinicopathologically distinct.
Collapse
|
22
|
Furman WL, Tricoli JV. Important considerations in treating children, adolescents and young adults with colorectal carcinoma. COLORECTAL CANCER 2013. [DOI: 10.2217/crc.13.40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) in children, adolescents and young adults under 30 years of age is rare. When it occurs in these young people, is this just an ‘adult’ cancer occurring in a young patient or is it a different disease? How should these patients be managed? Here, we review what is known about the epidemiology and clinical presentation of CRC in children, adolescents and young adults, as well as the current model for CRC development to provide a framework for questioning whether CRC in these young patients is the same disease as that seen in their older adult counterparts. In addition, we will summarize the clinical options described in the peer-reviewed literature to provide a basis for management decisions of these young patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wayne L Furman
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
- University of Tennessee Department of Pediatrics, TN, USA
| | - James V Tricoli
- Diagnostic Biomarkers and Technology Branch, Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 3 West, Room 526, MSC 9728, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chou CL, Chang SC, Lin TC, Chen WS, Jiang JK, Wang HS, Yang SH, Liang WY, Lin JK. Differences in clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer between younger and elderly patients: an analysis of 322 patients from a single institution. Am J Surg 2011; 202:574-82. [PMID: 21872205 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2010] [Revised: 10/06/2010] [Accepted: 10/06/2010] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) of different onset ages is controversial. METHODS Data were obtained from a prospective database at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. There were 2,738 newly diagnosed patients with CRC from 2001 to 2006. Two extreme age groups, younger (≤40 years) and elderly (≥80 years), were analyzed to compare clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis after exclusion of specific cancer syndrome. RESULTS A total of 322 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. The younger group consisted of 69 patients with mean age of 33.5 years, and the elderly group consisted of 253 patients with mean age of 83.4 years. Younger patients had a higher incidence of mucinous cell type (14.5% vs 6.3%, P = .05), poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (26.1% vs 6.3%, P < .001), more advanced disease (82.6% vs 41.9%, P < .001), poorer disease-free survival (67.2% vs 79.3%, P = .048), and cancer-specific survival (44.1% vs 73.1%, P < .001) than elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS In patients with CRC of younger onset, without relevant predisposing risk factors, younger patients have more advanced stages of disease, more aggressive histopathologic characteristics, and poorer prognoses compared with older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Lin Chou
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Population prevalence of familial cancer and common hereditary cancer syndromes. The 2005 California Health Interview Survey. Genet Med 2011; 12:726-35. [PMID: 20921897 DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e3181f30e9e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Family history guides cancer prevention and genetic testing. We sought to estimate the population prevalence of increased familial risk for breast, ovarian, endometrial, prostate, and colorectal cancers and hereditary cancer syndromes that include these cancers. METHODS Using the 2005 California Health Interview Survey data, a weak, moderate, or strong familial cancer risk was assigned to 33,187 respondents. Guidelines were applied to identify individuals with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. RESULTS Among respondents without a personal history of cancer, familial breast cancer was most prevalent; 7% had a moderate and 5% a strong familial risk. Older individuals and women were more likely to report family history of cancer. Generally, whites had the highest prevalence, and Asians and Latinos had the lowest prevalence. Among women without a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer, 2.5% met criteria for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer, and among individuals without a personal history of colorectal, endometrial or ovarian cancer, 1.1% met criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. CONCLUSIONS We provide population-based prevalence estimates for moderate and strong familial risk for five common cancers and hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Such estimates are helpful in planning and evaluation of genetic services and prevention programs, and assessment of cancer surveillance and prevention strategies.
Collapse
|
25
|
Nielsen M, van Steenbergen LN, Jones N, Vogt S, Vasen HFA, Morreau H, Aretz S, Sampson JR, Dekkers OM, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Hes FJ. Survival of MUTYH-associated polyposis patients with colorectal cancer and matched control colorectal cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102:1724-30. [PMID: 21044966 PMCID: PMC2982808 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND MUTYH-associated polyposis is a recessively inherited disorder characterized by a lifetime risk of colorectal cancer that is up to 100%. Because specific histological and molecular genetic features of MUTYH-associated polyposis colorectal cancers might influence tumor behavior and patient survival, we compared survival between patients with MUTYH-associated polyposis colorectal cancer and matched control patients with colorectal cancer from the general population. METHODS In this retrospective multicenter cohort study from Europe, 147 patients with MUTYH-associated polyposis colorectal cancer were compared with 272 population-based control patients with colorectal cancer who were matched for country, age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, stage, and subsite of colorectal cancer. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were used to compare survival between patients with MUTYH-associated polyposis colorectal cancer and control patients with colorectal cancer. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Five-year survival for patients with MUTYH-associated polyposis colorectal cancer was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 70% to 84%) and for control patients was 63% (95% CI = 56% to 69%) (log-rank test, P = .002). After adjustment for differences in age, stage, sex, subsite, country, and year of diagnosis, survival remained better for MUTYH-associated polyposis colorectal cancer patients than for control patients (hazard ratio of death = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.72). CONCLUSIONS In a European study cohort, we found statistically significantly better survival for patients with MUTYH-associated polyposis colorectal cancer than for matched control patients with colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Coate L, Cuffe S, Horgan A, Hung RJ, Christiani D, Liu G. Germline genetic variation, cancer outcome, and pharmacogenetics. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:4029-37. [PMID: 20679599 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.2336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies of the role of germline or inherited genetic variation on cancer outcome can fall into three distinct categories. First, the impact of highly penetrant but lowly prevalent mutations of germline DNA on cancer prognosis has been studied extensively for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations as well as mutations related to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. These mainly modest-sized analyses have produced conflicting results. Although some associations have been observed, they may not be independent of other known clinical or molecular prognostic factors. Second, the impact of germline polymorphisms on cancer prognosis is a burgeoning field of research. However, a deeper understanding of potentially confounding somatic changes and larger multi-institutional, multistage studies may be needed before consistent results are seen. Third, research examining the impact of germline genetic variation on differential treatment response or toxicity (pharmacogenetics) has produced some proof-of-principle results. Putative germline pharmacogenetic predictors of outcome include DPYD polymorphisms and fluorouracil toxicity, UGT1A1 variation and irinotecan toxicity, and CYP2D6 polymorphisms and tamoxifen efficacy, with emerging data on predictors of molecularly targeted or biologic drugs. Here we review data pertaining to these germline outcome and germline toxicity relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Coate
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Ave, Room 7-124, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9 Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nielsen M, Morreau H, Vasen HFA, Hes FJ. MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2010; 79:1-16. [PMID: 20663686 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2010] [Revised: 05/11/2010] [Accepted: 05/27/2010] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The human mutY homologue (MUTYH) gene is responsible for inheritable polyposis and colorectal cancer. This review discusses the molecular genetic aspects of the MUTYH gene and protein, the clinical impact of mono- and biallelic MUTYH mutations and histological aspects of the MUTYH tumors. Furthermore, the relationship between MUTYH and the mismatch repair genes in colorectal cancer (CRC) families is examined. Finally, the role of other base excision repair genes in polyposis and CRC patients is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje Nielsen
- Department Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Drescher KM, Sharma P, Lynch HT. Current hypotheses on how microsatellite instability leads to enhanced survival of Lynch Syndrome patients. Clin Dev Immunol 2010; 2010:170432. [PMID: 20631828 PMCID: PMC2901607 DOI: 10.1155/2010/170432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2010] [Accepted: 04/13/2010] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
High levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-high) are a cardinal feature of colorectal tumors from patients with Lynch Syndrome. Other key characteristics of Lynch Syndrome are that these patients experience fewer metastases and have enhanced survival when compared to patients diagnosed with microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer. Many of the characteristics associated with Lynch Syndrome including enhanced survival are also observed in patients with sporadic MSI-high colorectal cancer. In this review we will present the current state of knowledge regarding the mechanisms that are utilized by the host to control colorectal cancer in Lynch Syndrome and why these same mechanisms fail in MSS colorectal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen M Drescher
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Azidothymidine enhances fluorodeoxyuridine-mediated radiosensitization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76:905-13. [PMID: 20159365 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2009] [Revised: 09/11/2009] [Accepted: 09/14/2009] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the role of DNA repair and altered thymidine analogues in altering the response to radiation during thymidine deprivation. METHODS AND MATERIALS Mismatch repair-deficient and -proficient cell lines HEC59 and HC-2.4 were treated with fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR), azidothymidine (AZT), and irradiation either alone or in combination, and outcomes of clonogenic survival and cell-cycle distributions were determined. RESULTS Survival outcomes for all treatments were similar for both cell lines, suggesting that hMSH2 does not significantly influence thymidine deprivation toxicity or radiosensitization. The chain-terminating thymidine analogue AZT increased the toxicity of FUdR and increased DNA fragmentation. The combination of FUdR and AZT afforded greater radiosensitization than either drug alone. Drug enhancement ratios, the degree of excess radiation-induced cell death in drug-treated cultures compared with radiation alone for HEC59, were 1.2, 1.4, and 1.8 for AZT, FUdR, and the combination, respectively. Enhancement ratios for HC-2.4 were 1.3, 1.5, and 1.8 for AZT, FUdR, and the combination, respectively. CONCLUSION Azidothymidine, a chain-terminating thymidine analogue, can enhance the radiosensitizing affects of thymidine deprivation. Deoxyribonucleic acid strand breaks may play an important role in the mechanism of thymidine deprivation-induced radiosensitization.
Collapse
|
30
|
Maeda T, Cannom RR, Beart RW, Etzioni DA. Decision Model of Segmental Compared With Total Abdominal Colectomy for Colon Cancer in Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:1175-80. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.25.9812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In choosing the appropriate surgical option for patients with colon cancer and Lynch syndrome, goals of treatment are to maximize life expectancy while preserving quality of life. This study constructs a decision model that encompasses these two related considerations. Methods We constructed a state-transition (Markov) model based on assumptions obtained from available data sources and published literature. Two strategies were considered for the treatment of colon cancer in a patient with Lynch syndrome: segmental colectomy (SEG) and total abdominal colectomy (TAC) with ileorectal anastomosis. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated based on utility states for patients based on the colectomy they received. Multiple sensitivity analyses were planned to examine the impact of each assumption on model results. Results For young (30-year-old) patients with Lynch syndrome, mean survival was slightly better with TAC than with SEG (34.8 v 35.5 years). When QALYs were considered, the two strategies were approximately equivalent, with QALYs per patient of 21.5 for SEG and 21.2 for TAC. With advancing age, SEG becomes a more favorable strategy. Results of our model were most sensitive to the utility state of TAC (relative to SEG), rates of metachronous occurrence, and stage of cancer at the time of such occurrence. Conclusion SEG and TAC are approximately equivalent strategies for patients with colon cancer and Lynch syndrome. The decision regarding which operation is preferable should be made on the basis of patient factors and preferences, with special emphasis on age and the ability of the patient to utilize intensive surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Maeda
- From the Departments of Surgery and Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Rebecca R. Cannom
- From the Departments of Surgery and Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Robert W. Beart
- From the Departments of Surgery and Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA
| | - David A. Etzioni
- From the Departments of Surgery and Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yamada K, Kanazawa S, Koike J, Sugiyama H, Xu C, Funahashi K, Boland CR, Koi M, Hemmi H. Microsatellite instability at tetranucleotide repeats in sporadic colorectal cancer in Japan. Oncol Rep 2010; 23:551-561. [PMID: 20043121 PMCID: PMC2846616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Most tumors of patients with Lynch syndrome and a fraction of sporadic colorectal cancers (CRCs) exhibit high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI) at mono- and dinucleotide repeat loci. A different type of instability, elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotide repeats (EMAST) has been found in non-colonic cancers. Our previous study demonstrated that EMAST is common in sporadic CRC. Here, we focused on the relationships between EMAST and other genomic instability parameters or clinicopathological features in an unselected series of 88 sporadic CRCs. Of the tumors in the sample, 4 (4.5%) were MSI-high (MSI-H), 9 (10.2%) were MSI-low (MSI-L) and 75 (85.2%) were microsatellite stable. EMAST status was determined using 7 EMAST markers. Fifty-three (60.2%) tumors without MSI-H showed instability at >or=1 EMAST loci. All 4 MSI-H tumors showed instability at several EMAST loci. Instability profiles of MSI-H tumors at EMAST loci were more complex than those of non-MSI-H tumors. A tendency of positive association was observed between MSI-L and EMAST (P=0.023). The frequency of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for the 14 loci in EMAST-positive tumors was significantly higher than negative tumors (P=0.048). Among the clinicopathological parameters, only tumor location at the distal colon was associated with EMAST-negative tumors (P=0.0084, one-tailed). A relatively higher frequency of well-differentiated adenocarcinomas was observed in EMAST tumors as opposed to non-EMAST tumors, though the survival rate was similar. These results suggest that overlapping mechanisms that cause MSI-L, EMAST and LOH in CRCs may exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanae Yamada
- Department of Molecular Biology, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 143-8540
| | - Shinsaku Kanazawa
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan
| | - Junichi Koike
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan
| | - Hisahiko Sugiyama
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan
| | - Can Xu
- Department of Molecular Biology, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 143-8540
| | - Kimihiko Funahashi
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan
| | - C. Richard Boland
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Laboratory, Baylor Research Institute and Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75246, USA
| | - Minoru Koi
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Laboratory, Baylor Research Institute and Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75246, USA
| | - Hiromichi Hemmi
- Department of Molecular Biology, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 143-8540
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Sulkowski S, Wincewicz A, Zalewski B, Famulski W, Lotowska JM, Koda M, Sobaniec-Lotowska ME, Mysliwiec M, Baltaziak M, Pawlak K, Sulkowska M. Hypoxia related growth factors and p53 in preoperative sera from patients with colorectal cancer – evaluation of the prognostic significance of these agents. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009; 47:1439-45. [DOI: 10.1515/cclm.2009.305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|