SLN melanoma micrometastasis predictivity of nodal status: a long term retrospective study

Predictors of Nonsentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is not routinely performed for a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) anymore, adjuvant therapy depends on the risk factors available from SLN biopsy, including the risk of nonsentinel node metastases (NSNM). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in an attempt to identify risk factors that could be used to predict the risk of NSNM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for articles discussing predictive factors for NSNM. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and RevMan software was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) using the Mantel-Haenszel test.

RESULTS

Fifty publications were suitable for additional analysis. The clinical and primary tumor factors that were consistently identified as risk factors for NSNMs were: age >50, T stage 3 or 4, Clark level IV/V, ulceration, microsatellitosis, lymphovascular invasion, nodular histology, and extremity versus trunk primary tumor location. SLN factors that predicted NSNMs were >1 positive SLN, SLN micrometastatic tumor burden, diameter >2 mm, extracapsular extension, nonsubcapsular location (Dewar), and Rotterdam > 1 mm or ≥ 0.1 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings in this study support that many clinical and pathologic risk factors that can be assessed with SLN biopsy alone can be used to predict the risk of NSNMs. The factors identified in this review should be evaluated in clinical prediction models to predict the risk of NSNMS, a prediction that may be used to select patients for adjuvant therapy in high-risk melanoma.

Clinical prognostic significance of regional and extended lymphadenectomy for biliary cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to evaluate clinical prognostic significance of regional and extended lymphadenectomy for biliary cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

A thorough literature search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Central Register, Embase, ISI Web of Science and Google Scholar between January 1965 and May 2014 with restricted articles for the English language. Data were processed for a meta-analysis by RevMan 5 software.

RESULTS

Altogether 10 retrospective studies were finally enrolled in our study. For positive para-aortic lymph node group irrespective of regional lymph node metastasis, the overall 1-, 3-, 5-yr pooled RR estimates of survival rates were 2.30, 1.70, and 1.42. There were significant differences between positive para-aortic lymph node group and negative group. For positive para-aortic lymph node group in the setting of regional lymph node metastasis, the overall 1-, 3-, 5-yr pooled RR estimates of survival rates were 1.57, 1.29, and 1.11, respectively. The long-term outcomes referred to 5-yr survival rate were similar between para-aortic lymph node metastasis and regional lymph node metastasis only.

DISCUSSION

Radical resection with extended lymphadenectomy should be caution in terms of the results of an intraoperative sampling biopsy of para-aortic lymph node, which requires a well-designed, prospective controlled study in the future.

Utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy for solitary dermal melanomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Solitary dermal melanoma (SDM) is melanoma confined to subcutaneous and/or dermal layers in the absence of a known primary cutaneous lesion. We hypothesized that sentinel node biopsy is an effective staging strategy for this rare disease.

METHODS

A Markov decision model was constructed to represent two management strategies for SDM: wide local excision followed by observation, and wide local excision followed by sentinel node biopsy. Utilities, likelihood of positive sentinel node biopsy, and cancer progression rates during a five year time horizon were assigned based on institutional data and a review of existing literature. Estimated costs were derived using Medicare reimbursements.

RESULTS

Excision followed by sentinel node biopsy provides greater utility, yielding 3.85 discounted quality-adjusted life years (dQALY) compared to 3.66 for excision alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for sentinel node biopsy is $19,102 per dQALY. Sensitivity analyzes demonstrated that observation is more cost-effective if greater than 23% of sentinel node biopsies are positive (16% reported), or if 5-year survival for observed patients is greater than 76% (69% reported).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on existing clinical evidence, sentinel node biopsy yields greater utility than excision alone and is cost-effective for patients presenting with solitary dermal melanoma.