Atazanavir is safe and efficacious in HBV and HCV co-infected patients: results of AI424138 (CASTLE)

Repurposing antiviral drugs against HTLV-1 protease by molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation

Human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-1) belongs to the delta retrovirus family and the etiological agent of adult T-cell leukemia (ATL(. While the current HTLV-1 therapy, relies on using Zidovudine plus IFN-γ, there is no FDA approved drugs against it. In silico drug repurposing is a fast and accurate way for screening US-FDA approved drugs to find a therapeutic option for the HTLV-1 infection. So that, this research aims to analyze a dataset of approved antiviral drugs as a potential prospect for an anti-viral drug against HTLV-1 infection. Molecular docking simulation was performed to identify interactions of the antiviral drugs with the key residues in the HTLV-1 protease binding site. Then, molecular dynamics simulation was also performed for the potential protein-ligand complexes to confirm the stable behavior of the ligands inside the binding pocket. The best docking scores with the target was found to be Simeprevir, Atazanavir, and Saquinavir compounds which indicate that these drugs can firmly bind to the HTLV-1 protease. The MD simulation confirmed the stability of Simeprevir-protease, Atazanavir-Protease, and Saquinavir-Protease interactions. Clearly, these compounds should be further evaluated in experimental assays and clinical trials to confirm their actual activity against HTLV-1 infection.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Liver tolerance of raltegravir-containing antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the liver safety of raltegravir-including combinations in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infected patients.

METHODS

Grade 3-4 transaminase elevations (TEs) and grade 4 total bilirubin elevations (TBEs) were assessed during 12 months in 108 HIV/HCV co-infected patients starting antiretroviral therapy including raltegravir in a retrospective cohort study. Furthermore, the relationship between baseline fibrosis and hepatotoxic events was determined.

RESULTS

Eight patients (7.4%) developed grade 3 TEs and two (1.9%) patients showed grade 4 TEs. TBE grade 4 was detected in two (1.9%) patients. No patient permanently discontinued raltegravir because of hepatotoxic events. Of the patients with and without significant fibrosis, six (9.4%) and two (11.8%), respectively, showed grade 3-4 TEs (P = 0.769). Grade 3-4 TEs was observed in four (9.8%) patients in whom cirrhosis was ruled out, while none of the patients diagnosed with cirrhosis developed grade 3-4 TEs (P = 0.303). During the follow-up, the median (Q1-Q3) CD4 cell count increased from 257 (145-421) cells/mm(3) to 407 (213-587) cells/mm(3) (P < 0.0001) and the number of patients with an undetectable HIV viral load augmented from 33 (30.6%) to 73 (81.1%) (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Raltegravir-containing regimens are safe in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. The incidence of severe liver toxicity of raltegravir in these individuals is in the range of boosted protease inhibitors in clinical trials. The frequencies of grade 3-4 TEs and grade 4 TBEs were similar in patients receiving raltegravir with or without significant fibrosis or cirrhosis.

Atazanavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV-1 infection

Atazanavir (Reyataz), a protease inhibitor (PI), is approved in many countries for use as a component of antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens for the treatment of adult, and in some countries in paediatric, patients with HIV-1 infection. ART regimens containing ritonavir-boosted atazanavir improved virological and immunological markers in adult patients with HIV-1 infection, and had similar efficacy to regimens containing lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients. In addition, unboosted atazanavir was noninferior to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in treatment-naive patients. Atazanavir is administered once daily and has a low capsule burden. Atazanavir, whether unboosted or boosted, was generally well tolerated and appeared to be associated with less marked metabolic effects, including less alteration of lipid levels, than other PIs. These properties mean that boosted atazanavir, and unboosted atazanavir in patients unable to tolerate ritonavir, continues to have a role as a component of ART regimens in patients with HIV-1 infection.