The NOD2 3020insC Mutation in Women with Breast Cancer from the Bydgoszcz Region in Poland. First Results

Bladder cancer survival in patients with NOD2 or CDKN2A variants

Purpose: The association between the NOD2 c.3020insC allele and CDKN2A missense variant c.442G>A (p.P.A148T) and survival of patients with bladder or kidney cancer remains controversial.

Materials and Methods: We compared the allele frequencies of NOD2 c.3020insC and CDKN2A p.A148T allele in 706 patients with bladder cancer, 410 cases with kidney cancer against two control groups. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine whether there were any survival differences between carriers of the NOD2 c.3020insC or the CDKN2A p.A148T variant.

Results: Among the three patient subgroups: patients under 60 years of age, non-smokers and a third with histological features of low grade noninvasive papillary bladder cancer, we observed that the c.3020insC allele had a nominal statistically significant effect on survival. We also observed that the NOD2 c.3020insC variant was more frequent in patients with bladder cancer aged between 51 and 60 years.

There was some nominal evidence that the CDKN2A p.A148T polymorphism reduced survival in the subgroup of bladder cancer patients under 60 years of age. We observed that in kidney cancer patients, the incidence of the NOD2 variant appeared to be lower in the group aged between 60 and 70 years, however, this was not statistically significant. In addition, in patients with histological features of grade III chromophobic kidney cancer, the c.3020insC allele also appeared to be over-represented but this too was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: We have shown that the NOD2 c.3020insC allele and the CDKN2A p.A148T polymorphism does not play a role in the survival of patients with bladder cancer.

Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients with NOD2 mutation according to age

Introduction

The purpose of the present study was to characterise patients with breast cancer (BC) and NOD2-mutation (age ≥ 50 years) according to their clinicopathological factors or family history. Patients aged ≥ 50 years were compared with the control group and with NOD2-mutation carriers aged < 50 years.

Material and methods

Prognostic factors were analysed in patients with BC with confirmed NOD2 c.3016_3017insC (n = 150) mutations. The control group was selected from patients with BC without mutations (n = 376).

Results

There were significant differences between NOD2-mutation carriers and the control group aged ≥ 50 years, according to HER2 overexpression (p = 0.0001), ER (–) (p = 0.007), PR (–) (p = 0.003), T1–T2 (p = 0.011), and G3 (p = 0.036). Similarly, significant differences were observed between NOD2-mutation carriers and the control group aged < 50 years, according to HER2 overexpression (p = 0.0001), ER (–) (p = 0.049), and N (+) (p = 0.038). In patients aged ≥ 50 years, family history of cancer, including BC, was observed more often in NOD2-mutation carriers compared with the control group of patients (OR = 1.66; p = 0.072, for BC in family history: OR = 2.65; p = 0.002). NOD2-mutation carriers aged ≥ 50 years had significantly less frequent G3 (p = 0.004) and HER2 overexpression (p = 0.043) compared with patients with NOD2 mutation aged < 50 years.

Conclusions

The presence of the NOD2 mutation is not only characteristic of younger patients but also in patients > 50 years of age. In NOD2-mutation carriers aged ≥ 50 years, the presence of larger tumour size, G3, or HER2 overexpression were lower compared with younger patients with NOD2 mutation.

Molecular characteristics of breast cancer according to clinicopathological factors

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the correlation between molecular factors such as BRCA1 DNA repair associated (BRCA1), checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) and nucleotide binding oligomerization domain containing 2 (NOD2) gene mutations and clinicopathological factors in patients with breast cancer (BC). Prognostic factors were analyzed in BC patients with confirmed BRCA1 (n=73), CHEK2 (n=51) and NOD2 (n=31) mutations. The control group was selected from BC patients without mutations (n=392). The BRCA-associated cancer cases were significantly more often triple negative compared with sporadic cancer (62% vs. 14%; P=0.0001). Luminal B HER2-positive and HER2-positive non-luminal subtypes were observed more often in the control group (33 and 17%). The luminal A subtype was detected in 53% of CHEK2 mutation carriers and 45% of NOD2 mutation carriers. A lower histological grade was observed significantly more often in patients with CHEK2 mutations in comparison with the control group (88 vs. 69%; P=0.003). Lymph nodes without metastases were reported more frequently in NOD2 mutation carriers (74 vs. 54%; P=0.038), in BRCA1 mutations (73 vs. 54%; P=0.004) and, although not significantly, in CHEK2 mutation carriers (69 vs. 54%; P=0.071) compared with the control group. In conclusion, BRCA1 mutation was associated with TNBC and the luminal B HER2 (-) subtype. HER2-positive subtypes were characteristic of the control group. CHEK2 and NOD2 mutation carriers had a more favorable profile of prognostic factors.

Breast cancer in an 18-year-old female: A fatal case report and literature review

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent malignancy in both pre- and postmenopausal women. However, it is exceedingly rare in very young patients, and especially in adolescents. Herein, we report a case of an 18-year-old female diagnosed with invasive BC. The proband had been found to be negative for BC in close family members. A common BC genetic screening test for the Polish population did not detect any known founder mutations in the BRCA1 gene. Further evaluation identified a p.Ile157Thr (I157T) mutation in the CHEK2 gene, a p.Ala1991Val (A1991V) variant of unknown significance in the BRCA2 gene, p.Lys751Gln (K751Q) variant in the XPD (ERCC2) gene, and a homozygous p.Glu1008Ter (E1008*) mutation in the NOD2 gene. No other mutation had been found by next generation sequencing in major BC high-risk susceptibility genes BRCA1, BRCA2, as well as 92 other genes. To date, all these found alterations have been considered as low to moderate risk factors in the general population and moderate risk factors in younger women (<35 years of age). There are no previous articles relating low and moderate risk gene mutations to very young onset (below 20 years) BC with a fatal outcome. In our patient, a possible cumulative or synergistic risk effect for these 4 alterations, and a mutation in the NOD2 gene in particular, of which both presumably healthy parents were found to be carriers, is suggested.

Role of NOD1/CARD4 and NOD2/CARD15 gene polymorphisms in cancer etiology

NOD1/CARD4 and NOD2/CARD15 are members of Nod-like receptor family. They are located in cytosol, bind bacterial and viral ligands and play a key role in realization of innate and adaptive immune response, apoptosis, autophagy, and reactive oxygen species generation. Polymorphisms in NOD1/CARD4 and NOD2/CARD15 genes may shift balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, modulating the risk of infection, chronic inflammation and cancer. NOD1/CARD4 and NOD2/CARD15 gene polymorphisms may be associated with altered risk of gastric, colorectal, breast, ovarian, prostate, testicular, lung, laryngeal, liver, gallbladder, biliary tract, pancreatic, small bowel, kidney, urinary bladder cancer, skin cancer, nonthyroid endocrine tumors, lymphoma and leukemia. The short list of such polymorphisms perspective for oncogenomic investigations may include rs2006847, rs2066845, rs2066844, rs2066842, ND(1)+32656, rs2075820 whereas rs104895493, rs104895476, rs104895475, rs104895474, rs104895473, rs104895472, rs104895462, rs104895461, rs104895460, rs104895438, rs5743291, rs5743260, rs2076756, rs2066843, Pro371Thr, Ala794Pro, Gln908His, rs72551113, rs72551107, rs6958571, rs2907749, rs2907748, rs2075822, rs2075819, rs2075818 may be added to the extended list. Reasons of discrepancies between different studies include confounding host genetic, bacterial, or environmental factors modulating penetrance of variant allele and affecting risk of condition increasing cancer risk, different bacterial impact in aetiology of such conditions, differences in sample size, clinicopathological characteristics, diagnostics, stratification, genotyping methods, and chance.