Altered muscular activation during prone hip extension in women with and without low back pain

Effectiveness of gluteal control training in chronic low back pain patients with functional leg length inequality

Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder and is often accompanied by functional leg length inequality (FLLI). However, little was known about the effects of gluteal muscle control training in patients with LBP and FLLI. This study was designed to investigate the effects of gluteal control training in patients with LBP and FLLI. This is a double-blinded, randomized controlled study design. Forty-eight LBP patients with FLLI were randomized to the gluteal control training (GT) (47.58 ± 9.42 years) or the regular training (RT) (47.38 ± 11.31 years) group and received allocated training for six weeks. The outcome measures were pelvic inclination (PI), ilium anterior tilt difference (IATD), FLLI, visual analogue scale (VAS), patient specific-functional scale (PSFS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), hip control ability, global rating of change scale (GRoC), and lower extremity strength and flexibility. The intervention effects were compared using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance and chi-square tests with α = 0.05. The results indicated that the GT group showed greater improvement (P < 0.01) in PI (1.03 ± 0.38∘ vs. 1.57 ± 0.51∘), IATD (0.68 ± 0.66∘ vs. 2.31 ± 0.66∘), FLLI (0.3 ± 0.22 vs. 0.59 ± 0.13 cm), VAS (1.41 ± 1.32 vs. 3.38 ± 1.51), hip control ability (2.20 ± 0.45 vs. 0.89 ± 0.74), GRoC at 3rd and 6th week as compared to the RT group. Hip strength and flexibility also improved more in the GT group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, gluteal control training was more effective in improving low back pain and dysfunctions, and should be integrated in the management plan in patients with LBP and FLLI.

The clinical utility of the prone hip extension test in the diagnosis of motor control impairments associated with low back pain: A cross-sectional study using motion capture and electromyography

BACKGROUND

The prone hip extension test is used as a clinical tool to diagnose specific motor control impairments that have been identified in individuals with chronic low back pain. However, conventional protocols for performing the test are subjective and lack evidence for their effectiveness. The objective of the current study was to quantify lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation during this test and identify which motor control patterns best distinguish individuals with low back pain from asymptomatic controls.

METHODS

18 individuals with sub-acute or chronic low back pain and 32 asymptomatic controls performed the prone hip extension test while a 3D motion capture system measured lumbar and pelvic movement patterns and an electromyography system measured the muscle activation patterns of the paraspinal, gluteus maximus, and hamstring muscles. A three-stage statistical analysis was performed, the final stage being a stepwise logistic regression analysis aimed at identifying the movement and muscle activation pattern variables that best distinguished the two groups.

FINDINGS

The final regression model included three lumbar kinematic variables and several electromyographic amplitude variables for the gluteus maximus and hamstring muscles during right-sided prone hip extension. The final model correctly classified 86.7 % of the control group and 83.3 % of the low back pain group.

INTERPRETATION

The subject of asymmetrical gluteus maximus and hamstring muscle activation appears to be a potentially interesting area for future research on the utility of the prone hip extension test as a clinical tool in diagnosing motor control impairments associated with low back pain.

Hip biomechanics in patients with low back pain, what do we know? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical alterations in patients with low back pain (LBP), as reduced range of motion or strength, do not appear to be exclusively related to the trunk. Thus, studies have investigated biomechanical changes in the hip, due to the proximity of this joint to the low back region. However, the relationship between hip biomechanical changes in patients with LBP is still controversial and needs to be summarized. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically review observational studies that used biomechanical assessments in patients with non-specific LBP.

METHODS

The search for observational studies that evaluated hip biomechanical variables (i.e., range of motion, kinematic, strength, and electromyography) in adults with non-specific acute, subacute, and chronic LBP was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cinahl and Sportdiscus databases on February 22nd, 2024. Four blocks of descriptors were used: 1) type of study, 2) LBP, 3) hip and 4) biomechanical assessment. Two independent assessors selected eligible studies and extracted the following data: author, year of publication, country, study objective, participant characteristics, outcomes, and results. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Epidemiological Appraisal Instrument and classified as low, moderate, and high. Due to the heterogeneity of the biomechanical assessment and, consequently, of the results among eligible studies, a descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The search strategy returned 338 articles of which 54 were included: nine articles evaluating range of motion, 16 evaluating kinematic, four strength, seven electromyography and 18 evaluating more than one outcome. The studies presented moderate and high methodological quality. Patients with LBP, regardless of symptoms, showed a significant reduction in hip range of motion, especially hip internal rotation, reduction in the time to perform functional activities such as sit-to-stance-to-sit, sit-to-stand or walking, greater activation of the hamstrings and gluteus maximus muscles and weakness of the hip abductor and extensor muscles during specific tests and functional activities compared to healthy individuals.

CONCLUSION

Patients with LBP present changes in range of motion, task execution, activation, and hip muscle strength when compared to healthy individuals. Therefore, clinicians must pay greater attention to the assessment and management of the hip during the treatment of these patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42020213599).

The effect of chronic low back pain and lumbopelvic stabilization instructions on gluteus medius activation during sidelying hip movements

BACKGROUND

People with chronic low back pain (LBP) often demonstrate altered muscle activation with movements that involve the lumbopelvic region and hips.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare gluteus medius activity during sidelying hip abduction (SHA) and sidelying hip abduction-lateral rotation (SHALR) with and without instruction for lumbopelvic stabilization in people with and without chronic LBP.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted recruiting participants with (n = 17) and without (n = 17) chronic LBP. Gluteus medius activity was recorded with surface electromyography during the performance of SHA and SHALR with and without instructions including the abdominal drawing-in maneuver for lumbopelvic stabilization.

RESULTS

For SHA and SHALR, there was a significant main effect for instruction for stabilization indicated by a decrease in gluteus medius activity with instructions (p = .001, p < .001). There was not a significant main effect of chronic LBP on gluteus medius activity between groups for either activity. There was no significant interaction effect of pain and instruction for stabilization with SHA or SHALR.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of changes in gluteus medius muscle activation patterns with trunk stabilization instruction may help clinicians with assessment of exercise performance to optimize gluteus medius activation.

Trunk Muscle Activity and Ratio of Local Muscle to Global Muscle Activity during Supine Bridge Exercises under Unstable Conditions in Young Participants with and without Chronic Low Back Pain

Core exercises on an unstable surface increase trunk muscle activity, especially for local muscle groups. Therefore, there is a possibility that exercises on an unstable surface would be effective in the rehabilitation of non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). The present study assessed trunk muscle activities during bridge exercise on the floor and two kinds of unstable surfaces, i.e., a balance ball and the BOSU, for individuals with and without NSCLBP. This study enrolled 17 and 18 young participants with and without NSCLBP, respectively. In the balance ball condition, both groups showed a significant increase in erector spinae activity compared to the floor condition, and the increase in activity was significantly greater in the NSCLBP group than in the control group (p = 0.038). On the other hand, neither group showed significant changes in trunk muscle activities in the BOSU condition compared to those in the floor condition. The control group showed a significant increase in internal oblique/transversus abdominis activity under the balance ball condition (p = 0.020), whereas there were no significant changes in these muscle activities between the balance ball and floor conditions in the NSCLBP group. The present study showed that participants with NSCLBP significantly increased muscle activity of the erector spinae, one of the global back muscles, on the balance ball in spite of small effects on muscle activity of the internal oblique/transversus abdominis, which is one of the local abdominal muscles. Therefore, attention should be paid to the application of bridge exercises on the balance ball for individuals with NSCLBP.

Effect of Adding Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercises to Core Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Muscle Activity, Disability, and Sleep Quality in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Control Trial

Objective

The purpose of this study was to test the effect of adding diaphragmatic breathing exercises (DBEs) to core stabilization exercises (CSEs) for patients with chronic low back pain (CLPB).

Methods

Twenty-two patients with CLPB were randomly allocated to the experimental (DBE + CSE) or control group (CSE only). They were given 12 treatment sessions 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated before and after the 12 sessions. Surface electromyography of transverse abdominis, Oswestry Disability Index, Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, and chest expansion were used as outcome measures for pain, muscle activity, disability, and sleep quality.

Results

The outcome measure scores showed statistical significance of (P = .01) in time effect on muscle activity, sleep quality, disability score, pain score, fear-avoidance belief of patients and chest expansion; and group effect on Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire and physical activity parameter (P = .05). An interaction effect (time x group) on muscle activity for right transverse abdominus during tuck in (P = .01) and chest expansion (P = .01) was also found; however, no significant difference was found related to other parameters.

Conclusion

The combination of DBE and CSE interventions compared to CSE alone showed improvement in the measured parameters for patients with CLBP. Incorporating DBE with CSE also improved muscle activation and chest expansion.

Exploring the role of respiratory intervention as an effective adjunct tool in the management of chronic low back pain: A scoping systematic review

BACKGROUND

Individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) are usually prescribed manual therapy and exercise programs. Respiratory exercise interventions are also recommended by some researchers for CLBP. However, the evidence for the relative effectiveness of these treatments is limited, and the question of which sort of intervention is most suited remains unanswered.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of respiratory interventions in CLBP.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using databases: PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021233739).

RESULTS

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Out of these, one was of poor, three were of fair, and three were of good qualities. A total of 293 subjects were included in seven studies, the mean age of subjects ranged from 21 to 53 years. The largest effect size was reported for pain (d = 1.5) and maximum inspiratory pressure (d = 1.38). No detrimental effects were reported for any of the intervention programs.

CONCLUSIONS

Since most of the research has been done on pain and MIP, and both of these parameters have revealed significant changes with large effect size, therefore it can be concluded that respiratory interventions improve pain and MIP in CLBP. Owing to the limited number of studies available, a definitive outcome could not be documented for other parameters. Thus, further research is needed to provide a more robust piece of evidence and understanding.

Comparison of compensatory lumbar movement in participants with and without non-specific chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Many studies have compared muscle length and muscle activity for low back pain. However, compensatory movement for non-specific low back pain has not yet been studied sufficiently.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the length of the hip flexor, lumbar extensor endurance and the muscle activity of the erector spinae and gluteus maximus during hip extension, and the compensatory movement of the lumbar in people with or without nonspecific chronic low back pain.

METHODS

In this case-control study, 16 participants with non-specific chronic LBP and 17 without LBP were included. Hip flexor length was assessed by the modified Thomas test. Lumbar extensor endurance was assessed by the modified Biering-Sorensen test. Muscle activity of the erector spinae and gluteus maximus during hip extension was measured using a Delsys-Trigno wireless EMG system. Compensatory lumbar movements during hip extension were measured using a digital inclinometer.

RESULTS

Muscle activity of the erector spinae and compensatory lumbar movements were significantly higher in the LBP group. (p< 0.05). Hip flexor length, muscle activity of the gluteus maximus and endurance of the lumbar extensor were significantly differences in the LBP group (p< 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Shortened hip flexors, low gluteus maximus activity, and high erector spinae activity during hip extension, lumbar extensor weak endurance, lumbar compensatory movement are potential factors for non-specific LBP.

Correlations Between Hip Extension Range of Motion, Hip Extension Asymmetry, and Compensatory Lumbar Movement in Patients with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain

BACKGROUND This study aimed to confirm the correlations among hip extension range of motion, hip extension asymmetry, pain intensity, disability index, and compensatory lumbar movement in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS Of 66 patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain and limited hip extension, 59 met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), hip range of motion, compensatory lumbar extension, and compensatory lumbar rotation of the subjects were assessed. Pain was measured using a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), and hip extension range of motion and compensatory lumbar movement were evaluated using a digital dual inclinometer (Dualar IQ, JTech Medical, United States). Correlation analysis was used to analyze the data. RESULTS A strong correlation was observed among hip extension asymmetry, pain intensity, and disability index (P<0.05). However, no correlation was observed among compensatory lumbar rotation and extension, pain intensity, and ODI. A strong correlation also was observed between limited hip extension range of motion and compensatory lumbar rotation (P<0.05) but not between limited hip extension range of motion and compensatory lumbar extension (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study showed that hip extension asymmetry might be a more critical factor than hip extension range of motion. The strong correlation between limited hip extension and compensatory lumbar rotation suggests a risk of micro-trauma due to compensatory lumbar rotation.

Acute effects of centrally- and unilaterally-applied posterior-anterior mobilizations of the lumbar spine on lumbar range of motion, hamstring extensibility and muscle activation

BACKGROUND

Lumbar mobilizations are used to clinically treat the lumbar and hamstring region. However, evidence is limited regarding the effectiveness of specific mobilization methods.

OBJECTIVE

To compare central and unilateral posterior-anterior mobilizations (CPA, UPA) of the lumbar spine on lumbar and hamstring range of motion (ROM), and muscle activity (sEMG).

METHODS

Twenty participants received CPA, UPA, or no mobilization (CON) on separate occasions (crossover design). Post-treatment outcome measures were ROM during active lumbar flexion (ALF) and active knee extension (AKE), as well as sEMG of the Erector Spinae (ES) and Biceps Femoris (BF) during these movements.

RESULTS

sEMG was possibly to very likely lower following CPA (mean difference range =-5% to -21%) and UPA (-7% to -36%), while ROM was most likely greater (-12% to 25% and -17% to 24%, respectively). Most sEMG measures were possibly to likely lower following UPA versus CPA (-18% to -11%), while AKE ROM was possibly greater (-5.5%). Differences in ES sEMG (-2.5%) and ROM (-1.4%) during ALF were unclear and most likely trivial, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CPA and UPA mobilizations increase lumbar and hamstring ROM whilst reducing local muscle activity. These effects appear to be greater for UPA mobilizations when compared with CPA.

Comparison of hip extensor muscle activity including the adductor magnus during three prone hip extension exercises

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the role of the adductor magnus muscle (Amag) as a hip extensor while performing active prone hip extension (PHE), PHE with hip adduction (PHE-ADD), and PHE with hip abduction (PHE-ABD) with the gluteus maximus (Gmax) and hamstrings.

METHODS

The study recruited 22 healthy participants. Electromyography data were recorded from the Amag, Gmax, and medial and lateral hamstrings during PHE, PHE-ADD, and PHE-ABD. Normalized electromyographic data were examined using one-way, repeated-measures analyses of variance.

RESULTS

The magnitude of the Amag, Gmax, and hamstring activations did not differ significantly while performing PHE (p = 0.41). Furthermore, the Amag and hamstring activations were significantly greater than the Gmax activation when performing PHE-ADD (p < 0.05). The Gmax showed significantly greater activation during PHE-ABD than the Amag and medial and lateral hamstrings (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, we advocate including the Amag as a hip extensor during the PHE test or exercise. Our preliminary results have the potential to be applied directly to the PHE test, for investigating the muscle-activation pattern of the Amag with the Gmax and hamstrings in patients with hip or lower back pain.

Muscle activity and kinetics of lower limbs during walking in pronated feet individuals with and without low back pain

The objectives of this study were to investigate whether excessive feet pronation alters the joints' kinematics, kinetics and the activity of involved muscles during gait in low back pain patients.

METHODS

The lower limb joints' motion, moment and power, as well as the activity of involved muscles during walking were measured in a control group, and two experimental groups including a group with excessive feet pronation only, and another group of low back pain patients with excessive feet pronation.

RESULTS

In both experimental groups, ankle inversion, knee flexion and internal rotation, hip internal rotation, plantar flexors' moment, hip flexors' moment, and peak positive ankle power were lower than those in control group (p < .05). Besides, in patients, higher activity of gastrocnemius medialis, gluteus medius, erector spinae, and internal oblique muscles, and lower negative power at the ankle and peak positive power at the knee were observed (p < .05). In conclusion, pronated feet with low back pain was associated with less ankle inversion and knee flexion, higher knee and hip internal rotation, higher muscle activity, less energy absorption at the ankle, and reduced positive power at the knee. This study reveals that strengthening of the muscles especially knee extensors are of great importance in low back pain patients with feet pronation.

Differences in lumbar spine and lower extremity kinematics in people with and without low back pain during a step-up task: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) affects more than one third of the population at any given time, and chronic LBP is responsible for increased medical costs, functional limitations and decreased quality of life. A clear etiology is often difficult to identify, but aberrant posture and movement are considered contributing factors to chronic LBP that are addressed during physiotherapy intervention. Information about aberrant movement during functional activities in people with LBP can help inform more effective interventions. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are differences in lumbar spine and lower extremity kinematics in people with and without LBP during a step-up task.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 37 participants included 19 with LBP and 18 without a history of LBP. All participants were between the ages of 18 and 65, and controls were matched to participants with LBP based on age, gender and BMI. A motion capture system was used to record spine and lower extremity kinematics during the step-up task. ANOVA tests were used to determine differences in three-dimensional kinematics between groups.

RESULTS

Participants with LBP displayed less lower lumbar motion in the sagittal plane (P = 0.001), more knee motion in the coronal plane (P = 0.001), and more lower extremity motion in the axial plane (P = 0.002) than controls.

CONCLUSIONS

People with LBP display less lower lumbar spine motion in the sagittal plane and more out-of-plane lower extremity motion. Clinically, the step-up task can be used to identify these aberrant movements to develop more focused functional interventions for patients with LBP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Effects of prone trunk extension exercise using different fixations and with and without abdominal drawing-in maneuver in healthy individuals

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the differential effects of fixation of the thoracolumbar junction on the activity of the thoracic and lumbar muscle groups with and without the abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM). [Subjects and Methods] The participants were 40 healthy adults. During trunk extension, thoracic and lumbar muscle activities were assessed using surface electromyography when fixing the pelvic and popliteal areas and the thoracolumbar junction, with and without the ADIM. [Results] The activity of the thoracic extensors at the T9 level applying thoracolumbar fixation with ADIM was significantly higher than with only pelvic fixation or pelvic fixation with ADIM during prone trunk extension. However, the activity of the lumbar extensors at the L3 level with pelvic fixation alone, without ADIM, was significantly higher than pelvic fixation with ADIM or additional thoracolumbar fixation with ADIM during prone trunk extension [Conclusion] This study demonstrated that fixation of the thoracolumbar junction with ADIM during trunk extension was more effective at eliciting thoracic extensor and minimising lumbar extensor activity than other conventional fixation methods.

Lumbar lordosis in prone position and prone hip extension test: comparison between subjects with and without low back pain

Background

Prone hip extension (PHE) is a common and widely accepted test used for assessment of the lumbo-pelvic movement pattern. Considerable increased in lumbar lordosis during this test has been considered as impairment of movement patterns in lumbo-pelvic region. The purpose of this study was to investigate the change of lumbar lordosis in PHE test in subjects with and without low back pain (LBP).

Method

A two-way mixed design with repeated measurements was used to investigate the lumbar lordosis changes during PHE in two groups of subjects with and without LBP. An equal number of subjects (N = 30) were allocated to each group. A standard flexible ruler was used to measure the size of lumbar lordosis in prone-relaxed position and PHE test in each group.

Result

The result of two-way mixed-design analysis of variance revealed significant health status by position interaction effect for lumbar lordosis (P < 0.001). The main effect of test position on lumbar lordosis was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The lumbar lordosis was significantly greater in the PHE compared to prone-relaxed position in both subjects with and without LBP. The amount of difference in positions was statistically significant between two groups (P < 0.001) and greater change in lumbar lordosis was found in the healthy group compared to the subjects with LBP.

Conclusions

Greater change in lumbar lordosis during this test may be due to more stiffness in lumbopelvic muscles in the individuals with LBP.

Greater trochanter location measurement using a three-dimensional motion capture system during prone hip extension

[Purpose] The greater trochanter (GT) is an important structure in biomedical research, but the measurement methods require development. This study presents data from a new measurement method that does not use GT-marker-based measurement (No GT-m) in comparison with GT-marker based measurement (GT-m). [Subjects and Methods] We recruited 20 healthy subjects, who were asked to perform and maintain a prone position and then move to the prone hip extension. A motion capture system collected the kinematic data and the location of the GT was calculated by two measurements. [Results] GT migration distance differed significantly between the two measurements and the coefficient of the variation value was lower for the No GT-m method. Thigh lengths of the No GT-m method were comparable to the original lengths. There were significant differences between the GT-m and the other methods. [Conclusions] These data suggest that the GT-m method yielded a lower precision with a smaller GT migration distance. In the comparison of thigh length, the No GT-m method was in close agreement with the original length. We suggest that determining the location of the GT using the No GT-m has greater accuracy than the GT-m method.

Effect of the Abdominal Hollowing and Bracing Maneuvers on Activity Pattern of the Lumbopelvic Muscles During Prone Hip Extension in Subjects With or Without Chronic Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of abdominal hollowing (AH) and abdominal bracing (AB) maneuvers on the activity pattern of lumbopelvic muscles during prone hip extension (PHE) in participants with or without nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP).

METHODS

Twenty women with or without CLBP participated in this cross-sectional observational study. The electromyographic activity (amplitude and onset time) of the contralateral erector spinae (CES), ipsilateral erector spinae (IES), gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris muscles was measured during PHE with and without abdominal maneuvers. A 3-way mixed model analysis of variance and post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Between-group comparisons showed that the CES onset delay during PHE alone was greater (P = .03) and the activity level of IES, CES, and biceps femoris in all maneuvers (P < .05) was higher in patients with CLBP than in asymptomatic participants. In asymptomatic participants, PHE + AH significantly decreased the signal amplitude (AMP) of IES (P = .01) and CES (P = .02) muscles. In participants with CLBP, IES muscle AMP was lower during PHE + AH compared with PHE + AB and PHE alone. With regard to onset delay, the results also showed no significant difference between maneuvers within either of the 2 groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of the AH maneuver decreased the erector spinae muscle AMP in both groups, and neither maneuver altered the onset delay of any of the muscles in either group. The low back pain group showed higher levels of activity in all muscles (not statistically significant in gluteus maximus during all maneuvers). The groups were similar according to the onset delay of any of the muscles during either maneuver.

Mean individual muscle activities and ratios of total muscle activities in a selective muscle strengthening experiment: the effects of lower limb muscle activity based on mediolateral slope angles during a one-leg stance

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to provide basic data for research on selective muscle strengthening by identifying mean muscle activities and calculating muscle ratios for use in developing strengthening methods. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty-one healthy volunteers were included in this study. Muscle activity was measured during a one-leg stance under 6 conditions of slope angle: 0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, and 25°. The data used in the analysis were root mean square and % total muscle activity values. [Results] There were significant differences in the root mean square of the gluteus medius, the hamstring, and the medial gastrocnemius muscles. There were significant differences in % total muscle activity of the medial gastrocnemius. [Conclusion] Future studies aimed at developing selective muscle strengthening methods are likely to yield more effective results by using muscle activity ratios based on electromyography data.

Electromyographic Analysis of the Hip Extension Pattern in Visually Impaired Athletes

The objective of the study was to determine the order of muscle recruitment during the active hip joint extension in particular positions in young visually impaired athletes. The average recruitment time (ART) of the gluteus maximus (GM) and the hamstring muscle group (HMG) was assessed by the means of surface electromyography (sEMG). The sequence of muscle recruitment in the female and male group was also taken into consideration. This study followed a prospective, cross - sectional, randomised design, where 76 visually impaired athletes between the age of 18-25 years were enrolled into the research and selected on chosen inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, 64 young subjects (32 men and 32 women) were included in the study (age: 21.1 ± 1.05 years; body mass: 68.4 ± 12.4 kg; body height: 1.74 ± 0.09 m; BMI: 22.20 ± 2.25 kg/m2). All subjects were analysed for the ART of the GM and HMG during the active hip extension performed in two different positions, as well as resting and functional sEMG activity of each muscle. Between gender differences were comprised and the correlations between the ART of the GM and HMG with their functional sEMG activity during hip extension in both positions were shown. No significant differences between the ART of the GM and HMG were found (p>0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference of ART among both tested positions, as well in male as female subjects (p>0.05).

Onset and maximum values of electromyographic amplitude during prone hip extension after neurodynamic technique in patients with lumbosciatic pain: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

The mechanisms underlying the effects of neurodynamic techniques are still unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide a starting point for future research on explaining why neurodynamic techniques affect muscular activities in patients with sciatic pain.

METHODS

A double-blind trial was conducted in 12 patients with lumbosciatica. Surface electromyography activity was assessed for different muscles during prone hip extension. Pre- and post-intervention values for muscle activity onset and maximal amplitude signals were determined.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in the surface electromyography activity of maximal amplitude in the erector spinae and contralateral erector spinae (p < 0.05). Additionally, gluteus maximus (p < 0.05) activity onset was delayed post-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-neurodynamic sliding techniques modify muscular activity and onset during prone hip extension, possibly reducing unnecessary adaptations for protecting injured components. Future work will analyze the effects of self-neurodynamic sliding techniques during other physical tasks.

Effect of initial position on the muscle activity of the hip extensors and amount of pelvic tilt during prone hip extension

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to identify the effects of initial position of the hip joint with changes in the hip joint angle on the respective muscle activities of the bilateral erector spinae (ES), unilateral gluteus maximus (GM), and biceps femoris (BF) and the amount of pelvic anterior tilt during prone hip extension (PHE). [Subjects] Fifteen healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. [Methods] The subjects performed PHE in three positions: neutral, 20°, and 45° flexed hip joint. The activities of the ES, GM, and BF were measured using surface electromyography, and kinematic values for pelvic anterior tilt were calculated using a motion capture system. [Results] There was a significant decrease in muscle activity of the contralateral ES at 45°, and an increase in the GM muscle activity and decrease in the BF muscle activity at 20°. The amount of pelvic anterior tilt was lower at 20°. [Conclusion] These results suggest that a hip flexion position of 20° would have an advantage over the other measured positions.

Effects of abdominal drawing-in during prone hip extension on the muscle activities of the hamstring, gluteus maximus, and lumbar erector spinae in subjects with lumbar hyperlordosis

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of an abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM), measured using a pressure bio-feedback unit, on the activities of the hamstring, gluteus maximus, and erector spinae muscles during prone hip extension. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty healthy adult subjects (14 male, 16 female), were recruited. Subjects’ lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt angles were measured, and based on the results, the subjects were divided into two groups: a hyperlordotic lumbar angle (HLLA) group (n=15) and a normal lordotic lumbar angle (NLLA) group (n=15). The muscle activities of the hamstring and gluteus maximus, and of the erector spinae on the right side of the body, were recorded using surface electromyography. [Results] When performing ADIM with prone hip extension, the muscle activity of the gluteus maximus of the HLLA group significantly improved compared with that the NLLA group. [Conclusion] This study demonstrated that ADIM with prone hip extension was more effective at eliciting gluteus maximus activity in the HLLA group than in the NLLA group. Therefore, ADIM with prone hip extension may be useful for increasing the gluteus maximus activity of individuals with lumbar hyperlordosis.

Influence of Hip Joint Position on Muscle Activity during Prone Hip Extension with Knee Flexion

[Purpose] This study investigated the selective activation of the gluteus maximus during a prone hip extension with knee flexion exercise, with the hip joint in different positions. [Subjects] The subjects were 21 healthy, male volunteers. [Methods] Activities of the right gluteus maximus, right hamstrings, bilateral lumbar erector spinae, and bilateral lumbar multifidus were measured using surface electromyography during a prone hip extension with knee flexion exercise. Measurements were made with the hip joint in each of 3 positions: (1) a neutral hip joint position, (2) an abduction hip joint position, and (3) an abduction with external rotation hip joint position. [Results] Gluteus maximus activity was significantly higher when the hip was in the abduction with external rotation hip joint position than when it was in the neutral hip joint and abduction hip joint positions. Gluteus maximus activity was also significantly higher in the abduction hip joint position than in the neutral hip joint position. Hamstring activity was significantly lower when the hip was in the abduction with external rotation hip joint position than when it was in the neutral hip joint and abduction hip joint positions. [Conclusion] Abduction and external rotation of the hip during prone hip extension with knee flexion exercise selectively activates the gluteus maximus.

EMG activity and force during prone hip extension in individuals with lumbar segmental instability

The goal of the current study was to investigate potential differences in back and hip extensor muscle activity and hip extension force during prone hip extension (PHE) in individuals with lumbar segmental instability (LSI) and asymptomatic subjects. Thirty-six subjects with LSI and 26 asymptomatic volunteers participated in this study. Muscle activity of the erector spinae, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris was recorded using electromyography (EMG), and hip extension force was measured by a digital force gauge. Muscle activity was significantly greater in subjects with LSI than in asymptomatic subjects during PHE (p < 0.05). Hip extension force was significantly lower in the subjects with LSI than in asymptomatic subjects during PHE (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that during PHE, subjects with LSI have differences in back and hip extensor muscle activity and hip extension force compared to asymptomatic individuals.

Effects of Pelvic Belt on Hip Extensor Muscle EMG Activity during Prone Hip Extension in Females with Chronic Low Back Pain

[Purpose] This study assessed the effects of a pelvic belt (PB) on the electromyography (EMG) activity of the elector spinae (ES), gluteus maximus (GM), and biceps femoris (BF) in females with chronic low back pain (CLBP) during prone hip extension (PHE). [Subjects] Twenty female with CLBP were recruited. Surface EMG data were collected from the ES, GM, and BF muscles during a PHE task. [Results] The EMG activity in the ES bilaterally, and the right GM decreased significantly when a PB was applied compared with when a PB was not applied. [Conclusion] This suggests that a PB is effective for altering the activation pattern of the hip extensor muscles in females with CLBP during PHE.

A regional interdependence model of musculoskeletal dysfunction: research, mechanisms, and clinical implications

The term 'regional interdependence' or RI has recently been introduced into the vernacular of physical therapy and rehabilitation literature as a clinical model of musculoskeletal assessment and intervention. The underlying premise of this model is that seemingly unrelated impairments in remote anatomical regions of the body may contribute to and be associated with a patient's primary report of symptoms. The clinical implication of this premise is that interventions directed at one region of the body will often have effects at remote and seeming unrelated areas. The formalized concept of RI is relatively new and was originally derived in an inductive manner from a variety of earlier publications and clinical observations. However, recent literature has provided additional support to the concept. The primary purpose of this article will be to further refine the operational definition for the concept of RI, examine supporting literature, discuss possible clinically relevant mechanisms, and conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings on clinical practice and research.

The activity pattern of the lumbo-pelvic muscles during prone hip extension in athletes with and without hamstring strain injury

BACKGROUND

Altered muscular activation pattern has been associated with musculoskeletal disorders. Some previous studies have demonstrated muscle weakness or tightness in athletes who have sustained hamstring (HAM) injuries. However, no study has clinically investigated the muscular activity pattern in subjects with HAM strain injuries.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the activity pattern of the ipsilateral erector spinae (IES), contralateral erector spinae (CES), gluteus maximus (GM), and medial and lateral HAM muscles during the prone hip extension (PHE) test in athletes with and without history of HAM strain injury.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional non-experimental study design.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 20 soccer athletes participated in the study. Subjects were categorized into two groups: those with history of HAM strain injury (n=10, mean age = 22.6 ± 3.74) and without history of HAM strain (n =10, mean age = 22.45 ± 3.77).

METHODS

Three repetitions of the PHE were performed by each subject, and the electromyographic (EMG) outputs of the IES, CES, GM, and HAM muscles were recorded, processed and normalized to maximum voluntary electrical activity (MVE). Independent t-tests were used for comparing activation means of each muscle between athletes with and without history of HAM strain injury.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in EMG activity of the GM (p= 0.04) and medial HAM (p = 0.01) between two groups. No significant difference was found in EMG signals of the IES (p= 0.26), CES (= 0.33) and lateral HAM (p= 0.58) between the two groups. Greater although non-significant normalized EMG outputes of IES, CES and lateral HAM were seen in athletes with history of HAM strain compared to those without HAM strain.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study demonstrated greater normalized EMG activity of GM and medial HAM tested in athletes with history of HAM strain compared to those without HAM strain (altered activation pattern).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3a.

Comparison of Posterior Oblique Sling Activity during Hip Extension in the Prone Position on the Floor and on a Round Foam Roll

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to compare muscle activity of the posterior oblique sling during prone hip extension (PHE) on the floor and on a round foam roll. [Subjects] Twenty-two (11 male, 11 female) healthy volunteers were recruited for this study. [Methods] The participants performed PHE on the floor and on a round foam roll. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded from the contralateral latissimus dorsi (LD), contralateral erector spinae (ES), ipsilateral ES, ipsilateral gluteus maximus (GM), and ipsilateral biceps femoris (IBF). A paired t-test was used to compare muscle activity under the floor and round foam roll conditions. [Results] EMG activity of the contralateral LD, ipsilateral ES, and ipsilateral GM was significantly greater when PHE was performed on the round foam roll than on the floor. [Conclusion] Performing PHE on the round foam roll induced greater posterior oblique sling EMG activity than did exercise on the floor. These results suggest that the activation pattern of the posterior oblique sling during PHE is differs according to the type of surface (stable vs. unstable) on which it is performed.

Recurrent hamstring muscle injury: applying the limited evidence in the professional football setting with a seven-point programme

Recurrent hamstring injuries are a major problem in sports such as football. The aim of this paper was to use a clinical example to describe a treatment strategy for the management of recurrent hamstring injuries and examine the evidence for each intervention. A professional footballer sustained five hamstring injuries in a relatively short period of time. The injury was managed successfully with a seven-point programme—biomechanical assessment and correction, neurodynamics, core stability, eccentric strengthening, an overload running programme, injection therapies and stretching/relaxation. The evidence for each of these treatment options is reviewed. It is impossible to be definite about which aspects of the programme contributed to a successful outcome. Only limited evidence is available in most cases; therefore, decisions regarding the use of different treatment modalities must be made by using a combination of clinical experience and research evidence.

Applied kinesiology: distinctions in its definition and interpretation

Modification of the motor system in assessing and treating as well as understanding one of the causes of musculoskeletal dysfunctions is a topic of growing importance in healthcare. Applied kinesiology (AK) addresses this interest in that it is a system which attempts to evaluate numerous aspects of health (structural, chemical, and mental) by the manual testing of muscles combined with other standard methods of diagnosis. It leads to a variety of conservative, non-invasive treatments which involve joint manipulations or mobilizations, myofascial therapies, cranial techniques, meridian and acupuncture skills, clinical nutrition and dietary management, counseling skills, evaluating environmental irritants, and various reflex techniques. The effectiveness of these ancillary treatments is believed to be consistent with the expanded construct validity of the manual muscle test (MMT), as described, although this assertion has primarily been tested in outcome studies. AK and its adjunctive procedures (challenge and therapy localization) are highlighted in this review providing details of its implementation as prescribed by an International College of Applied Kinesiology's Board of Examiners, cited for its scholarly and scientific activities. Because these procedures are believed to identify specific articular, soft tissue, biochemical, or emotional issues underlying muscle function, the applicability of this diagnostic method for all clinicians treating muscle imbalance disorders is described. As of yet, MMT efficacy in therapy localization and challenge techniques has not been established in published, peer-reviewed research. A variety of challenges likewise remain for professional AK to establish itself as an emerging science, with numerous gaps in the literature and testable hypotheses enumerated. Of particular concern are a multiplicity of derivatives of AK that have been described in the literature, which should be greeted with caution in light of the fact that they lack one or more of the essential attributes of AK as described in this report. The validity of these studies which have been critical of applied kinesiology appears in many instances to be no greater than several of the randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case control studies, and case studies found in this communication to support various aspects of applied kinesiology.