Cascade plasmapheresis (CP) as a preconditioning regime in ABO-incompatible live related donor liver transplants (ABOi-LDLT)

ABO Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Children: A Single Centre Experience from India

Background

In recent years, paediatric ABO incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplant (LT) has shown promising outcomes and can potentially eliminate organ shortage. This study aims to report paediatric ABOi LT experience, including short- and long-term outcomes.

Methods

It is a single-centre retrospective study. Out of 108 LTs, 20 were done in children. We compared the outcomes between ABOi (n = 20) and non-ABOi (n = 220) paediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) performed during the study period. All the children received pre-LT desensitization therapy comprising rituximab and plasmapheresis targeting pre-LT isohemagglutinin (IHA) titres of ≤1:16.

Results

Out of 239 paediatric LDLTs from 2017 to 2022, 19 children (11 females) underwent 20 ABOi LTs (including one retransplant with an ABOi domino allograft) at a median age of 12 (12, 51) months, with the majority being biliary atresia (60%). The median change in CD19 cell%, CD20 cell%, and IHA titres after rituximab from day -14 to day -1 (before LT) was satisfactory. In the first 3 months following LT, acute cellular rejection, culture-proven sepsis, and biliary and vascular complications were seen in 10%, 20%, 20%, and 15%, respectively. None of the ABOi LT recipients developed antibody-mediated rejection. ABOi LT recipients, as compared to non-ABOi LT recipients, had a higher incidence of bile leaks and prolonged hospital stay, with the rest of the complications, including biliary strictures and long-term outcomes, being comparable. At a median follow-up of 21 (14, 33) months, 4 children expired (21%).

Conclusion

ABOi LT in children shows excellent outcomes and can be performed safely with prior desensitization when a compatible liver is unavailable.

Large volume plasmapheresis using a single-use immunoadsorption column: A cost-effective approach for desensitization in ABO-incompatible liver transplant

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplant is a life-saving treatment, but due to the limited availability of suitable liver donors, ABO-incompatible liver transplants (ABOi-LT) are conducted to increase the availability of liver donors. Perioperative desensitization for ABOi-LT is an established strategy to circumvent the risk of graft rejection. A single prolonged session can be performed to achieve the desired titers to avoid using multiple immunoadsorption (IA) columns or off-label reuse of single-use columns. This study retrospectively assessed the effectiveness of a single prolonged plasmapheresis session using IA as a desensitization strategy in live donor liver transplant (LDLT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study conducted at a center for liver diseases in North India on six ABOi-LDLT patients who underwent single prolonged IA sessions in the perioperative period from January 2018 to June 2021.

RESULTS

Median baseline titer in patients was 320 (64, 1024). The median plasma volume adsorbed was 7.5 volumes (4, 8) per procedure, with a mean procedure time of 600 min (310-753). The reduction in titer ranged from 4 log to 7 log reduction per procedure. Two patients developed transient hypotension during the procedure, which was managed successfully. The median duration of pre-transplant hospital stay was 1.5 days (1, 3).

CONCLUSION

Desensitization therapy helps overcome the ABO barrier and decreases the waiting period before a transplant when ABO identical donors are unavailable. A single prolonged IA session reduces the cost of additional IA columns and hospital stay, thus making it a cost-effective approach to desensitization.

ABO-incompatible Pediatric Liver Transplantation With Antibody and B-cell Depletion-free Immunosuppressive Protocol in High Consanguinity Communities

The success of orthotopic liver transplantation as a life-saving treatment has led to new indications and a greater competition for organ grafts. Pediatric patients with acute liver-related crises can benefit from orthotopic liver transplantation, but organ availability in the limited time can be a major obstacle. Crossing ABO blood group barriers could increase the organs available to such patients.

METHODS

From November 2010 to June 2015, 176 children aged 0.2-to18 y were transplanted in the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center. Out of those, 19 children were transplanted across blood group barriers (ABO incompatible). The underlying diseases were biliary atresia (n = 6); progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2 (n = 4); Crigler-Najjar syndrome (n = 3); hepatoblastoma (n = 2); and urea cycle disorder, Caroli disease, cryptogenic cirrhosis, and neonatal sclerosing cholangitis (n = 1 each). Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, and steroids. Pretransplant prophylactic plasmapheresis, high-dose immunoglobulins, and rituximab were not administered.

RESULTS

The grafts were from living donors (n = 17) and deceased donors (n = 2). Living donor morbidity was nil. The recipient median age was 21 mo (5-70 mo). After a median follow-up of 44 mo, 2 recipients (10%) died because of sepsis, 1 because of uncontrolled acute myeloid leukemia. The overall rejection rate was 7%, and no grafts were lost because of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). HLA matching was 3.8 of 6 (A, B, DR), and there were 2 patients presented with acute cellular rejection, 1 patient with AMR, and 1 patient with biliary strictures.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO incompatible liver transplantation is a feasible and life-saving option even with antibody and B-cell depletion-free protocol without increasing the risks for AMR. We speculate that this excellent result is most likely because of presence of relatively low titer ABO isoagglutinins and the high HLA match compatibility caused by habit of longstanding interfamilial marriages as typical of Saudi Arabia.

Therapeutic apheresis and non-blood donor related apheresis current practices at various blood centres of healthcare organisations of India: A brief online survey

OBJECTIVES

To determine the variability in therapeutic apheresis (TA) and non-blood donor related apheresis practices, and the extent of expertise and knowledge of blood centre staff.

BACKGROUND

Apheresis activity that was earlier limited to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and donor apheresis at few centres in India has seen remarkable surge involving many centres practising TA and non-blood donor related apheresis. The decentralised transfusion medicine practice in country has resulted in wide variability of knowledge and practice of TA. An online survey was conducted to achieve study objectives.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A 22 questionnaire survey was sent to the 215 blood centres through e-mail link focussing on three aspects; basic information of the participating centres, details of TA procedures and education and training levels of the staff.

RESULTS

Majority (71.9%) of centres were teaching institutions among analysed 57 centres. TPE (85.9%) and therapeutic cytapheresis (71.9%) were the most common TA procedures. The clinical haematology (68.4%) followed by neurology (64.9%) were the specialities utilising TA. The 64.9% centres used continuous flow cell separator and central venous access (52%) was preferred vascular access. A combination of normal saline, fresh frozen plasma and 5% albumin replacement fluid was first choice. Doctors involved in TA were trained in apheresis during their MD/DNB degree, but no structured training program existed for other category of staff.

CONCLUSION

There was a wide variability in TA practice in India and a dedicated training program for all categories of staff was emphasised by majority of participants.

Renal transplantation in HLA sensitized patients: Traversing the immunological barrier

Successful renal transplantation across HLA barrier in sensitized individuals has been on the rise during the past decade, primarily due to improved desensitization regimes. The aim of this study was to share outcome of desensitization in renal transplant recipients with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). This was a retrospective analysis of all HLA immunized individuals who were prospective renal transplant recipients. All such patients underwent preconditioning as per the institutional desensitization protocol. Complement-dependent cytoxicity-based crossmatch (CDC-XM), luminex-based crossmatch (LM-XM) and flowcytometry-based crossmatch (FC-XM) were done in all cases. If any of these tests turned out positive, single antigen bead assay (SAB) was performed. Desensitization for DSA was performed in 55 patients and all patients were followed-up for 1 year to assess graft function and patient outcome. CDC-XM being a less sensitive assay, could not detect incompatibility in 29 (52.73%) cases. After desensitization, even though SAB and LM-XM results revealed an MFI within acceptable range, FC-XM being an extremely sensitive assay, continued to give a positive result in eight (14.55%) cases. The mean ± SD number of pretransplant TPE were 3.44 ± 0.98 (2-11). Out of 55, there were 10 patients who were lost to follow up. Patient and graft survival of 45 patients at 1 year was found to be 100%. Preconditioning for renal transplants in the form of immunosuppression with TPE is an extremely useful auxiliary for transplantation in HLA sensitized renal transplant recipients.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

Cascade plasmapheresis as a desensitization strategy for patients undergoing ABO incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOi LDLT): A single center experience

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The reduction of antibody titres (AT's) to a safe level is essential pre-requisite for patients awaiting ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABOi LT). We report our experience of performing cascade plasmapheresis (CP) on 2 different apheresis platforms (COBE Spectra and Spectra Optia) as a desensitization strategy for patients undergoing ABOi LT in our centre.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who underwent CP included in the desensitization protocol for ABOi LDLT. CP/conventional TPE was performed (daily/alternate day with daily estimation of AT) until a target titre of ≤ 8 was achieved.

RESULTS

During the study period, 4 patients (mean age 46.7 years; 100% males) underwent desensitization for ABOi LDLT with baseline AT (combined IgM and IgG) ranging from 64 to 512. A total of 15 CP sessions (range 2 - 6) were performed with a median of 3.5 sessions/patient. Desensitization rate was 100%. Only 1 patient underwent conventional TPE in the post-transplant due to rise in AT level to 64 (post-operative day 8). Average post-operative length of stay was 49 days (range 30 - 105). None of the patients experienced any episode of rejection (repeat liver biopsy). On follow up (1 year), 2 patients were alive and doing well, while other 2 patients succumbed during their hospital stay due to sepsis.

CONCLUSION

In our limited experience, the use of CP was safe and effective desensitization strategy for patients undergoing ABOi LDLT.

ABO incompatible renal transplant: Transfusion medicine perspective

INTRODUCTION:

Our study presents an analysis of the trends of ABO antibody titers and the TPE (Therapeutic Plasma Exchange) procedures required pre and post ABO incompatible renal transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Twenty nine patients underwent ABO incompatible renal transplant during the study period. The ABO antibody titers were done using the tube technique and titer reported was the dilution at which 1+ reaction was observed. The baseline titers of anti-A and anti-B antibodies were determined. The titer targeted was ≤8. Patients were subjected to 1 plasma volume exchange with 5% albumin and 2 units of AB group FFP (Fresh Frozen Plasma) in each sitting. TPE procedures post-transplant were decided on the basis of rising antibody titer with/ without graft dysfunction.

RESULTS:

The average number of TPE procedures required was 4-5 procedures/patient in the pretransplant and 2-3/patient in the post-transplant period. An average titer reduction of 1 serial dilution/procedure was noted for Anti-A and 1.1/procedure for Anti-B. Number of procedures required to reach the target titer was not significantly different for Anti-A and Anti-B (P = 0.98). Outcome of the transplant did not differ significantly by reducing titers to a level less than 8 (P = 0.32). The difference in the Anti-A and Anti-B titers at 14th day post-transplant was found to be clinically significant (P = 0.042).

CONCLUSION:

With an average of 4-5 TPE procedures pretransplant and 2-3 TPE procedures post transplants, ABO incompatible renal transplantations can be successfully accomplished.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Seventh Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Successful Renal Transplantation Across HLA Barrier: Report from India

Organ donors are sometimes found “unsuitable” due to the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in the recipient. In recent years, improved desensitization protocols have successfully helped to overcome HLA incompatibility hurdle. We present three cases where optimum desensitization was achieved in patients with the donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) leading to successful renal transplantation. All patient–donor pair underwent HLA typing, complement dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM), flow cytometry XM (FC-XM), and panel reactive antibody. If any of the three tests was positive, single antigen bead assay was performed to determine the specificity of the anti-HLA antibody (s). Patients with DSA were offered organ-swap or anti-HLA antibody desensitization followed by transplantation. Desensitization protocol consisted of single dose rituximab and cascade plasmapheresis (CP) along with standard triple immunosuppression. The target DSA mean fluorescence index (MFI) was <500, along with negative CDC-XM and FC-XM for both T- and B-cells. Three patients with anti-HLA DSA, who did not find a suitable match in organ swap program, consented to anti-HLA antibody desensitization, followed by transplantation. Mean pre-desensitization antibody MFI was 1740 (1422–2280). Mean number of CP required to achieve the target MFI was 2.3 (2–3). All the three patients are on regular follow-up and have normal renal function test at a mean follow-up of 8 months. This report underlines successful application of desensitization protocol leading to successful HLA-antibody incompatible renal transplants and their continued normal renal functions.

Current techniques for AB0-incompatible living donor liver transplantation

For a long time, it was considered medical malpractice to neglect the blood group system during transplantation. Because there are far more patients waiting for organs than organs available, a variety of attempts have been made to transplant AB0-incompatible (AB0i) grafts. Improvements in AB0i graft survival rates have been achieved with immunosuppression regimens and plasma treatment procedures. Nevertheless, some grafts are rejected early after AB0i living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) due to antibody mediated rejection or later biliary complications that affect the quality of life. Therefore, the AB0i LDLT is an option only for emergency situations, and it requires careful planning. This review compares the treatment possibilities and their effect on the patients’ graft outcome from 2010 to the present. We compared 11 transplant center regimens and their outcomes. The best improvement, next to plasma treatment procedures, has been reached with the prophylactic use of rituximab more than one week before AB0i LDLT. Unfortunately, no standardized treatment protocols are available. Each center treats its patients with its own scheme. Nevertheless, the transplant results are homogeneous. Due to refined treatment strategies, AB0i LDLT is a feasible option today and almost free of severe complications.

Liver transplantation in India

Liver transplantation as an established form of treatment for end-stage liver disease has gained acceptance in India over the last 10 years. Liver transplantation in India has unique features that have contributed to the growth of both deceased donor and living donor transplantations of which living donor currently dominates the picture. Living donor contributes to 80% and deceased donor to 20% of the liver transplants currently performed in India. The majority of these transplants are performed within the private sector with public sector hospitals lagging behind significantly. This article gives an overview of the evolution of liver transplantation in India and the potential future challenges. Liver Transplantation 22 1019-1024 2016 AASLD.

Living donor liver transplantation in India

Liver transplantation is currently in its golden period in India. The number of transplants being performed and the steady increase in the new programs that have emerged over the last decade is a testimony to it. The growth was not smooth, especially in the early years. But a multipronged approach in developing infrastructure and the involvement of multidisciplinary teams in the management of transplant patients has had a major positive impact on the outcome and as a result a positive impetus to the growth of this specialty in India. To date, the majority of transplants performed in India are live donor liver transplants. Deceased donation is more sporadic and concentrated in a couple of regions. With phenomenal increase in transplant activity in India, there is huge potential for streamlining data sharing among programs in India and with the rest of the world to ultimately benefit the transplant community.