Preventing deaths related to percutaneous tracheostomy: safety is never too much!

Managing complications of percutaneous tracheostomy and gastrostomy

Percutaneous tracheostomy and gastrostomy are some of the most commonly performed procedures at bedside in the intensive care unit. While they are generally considered safe, they can be associated with numerous short and long-term complications, many of which can occur long after their placement and cause significant morbidity. Performers of these procedures should possess a comprehensive understanding of procedural indications and contraindications, and know how to recognize and manage complications that may arise. In this review, we highlight complications of percutaneous tracheostomy and describe strategies for their prevention and management, with a special focus on post-tracheostomy tracheal stenosis. Other complications reviewed include bleeding, pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema, posterior wall injury, tube displacement, tracheomalacia, tracheoinominate artery fistula, tracheo-esophageal fistula, and stomal cellulitis. Gastrostomy complications and their management are also discussed including bleeding, internal organ injury, necrotizing fasciitis, aspiration pneumonia, buried bumper syndrome, tumor seeding, wound infection, tube displacement, peristomal leakage, and gastric outlet obstruction. In light of the potentially serious outcomes associated with complications of percutaneous tracheostomy and gastrostomy, the emphasis should be placed on risk-reduction strategies to minimize morbidity and mortality. We therefore present detailed pragmatic and comprehensive checklists to serve as a reference for clinicians involved in performing these procedures.

A Novel, Adaptable Laryngeal Mask to Facilitate a Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy: Proof-of-Concept Prototype Demonstration on a Mannequin Model and Cadaver

BACKGROUND

Most percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) mortalities result from airway-related complications. Improved airway pressure management and gas delivery are targets for innovation. This study describes an adaptable laryngeal mask (ALM) designed to remove the bronchoscope from the endotracheal tube (ETT) and place it in a separate lumen. Airflow and device efficacy were evaluated during PDTs with an ALM on mannequins and cadavers, respectively.

METHODS

Procedures were completed by a single physician using an 8.0 mm ETT and the Ciaglia Blue Rhino method on simulation mannequins (TruCorp AirSim Traci) and fresh-frozen cadavers. Mannequin simulation tested the respiratory capabilities of an ALM utilizing a BioPac spirometer and a Maquet Servo ventilator. Qualitative analysis on device efficacy was performed on 2 fresh-frozen cadavers (1 male, 1 female).

RESULTS

Preliminary ventilation testing on a PDT-able mannequin using the ALM showed an increase in airflow reaching the lungs compared with a deflated ETT. During mannequin and cadaver testing, the ALM was placed over the in situ ETT effectively, thereby removing the bronchoscope from the ETT while maintaining a continuous visual of the incision site. Both mannequin and cadaveric testing using an ALM enabled a single physician to safely perform the PDT procedure with minimal assistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial testing using an ALM during PDT on mannequins and cadavers showed an improvement in airflow and the removal of the bronchoscope from the ETT, respectively. Further studies using the ALM in a patient population compared with standard techniques would be useful.

Percutaneous tracheostomy in patients on anticoagulants

Aims:

To determine if percutaneous tracheostomy is safe in critically ill patients treated with anticoagulant therapies.

Settings and Design:

Single-center retrospective study including all the patients who underwent percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) placement over a 1-year period in a 14-bed, cardiothoracic and vascular Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Materials and Methods:

Patients demographics and characteristics, anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies, coagulation profile, performed technique and use of bronchoscopic guidance were retrieved.

Results:

Thirty-six patients (2.7% of the overall ICU population) underwent PDT over the study period. Twenty-six (72%) patients were on anticoagulation therapy, 1 patient was on antiplatelet therapy and 2 further patients received prophylactic doses of low molecular weight heparin. Only 4 patients had normal coagulation profile and were not receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies. Overall, bleeding of any severity complicated 19% of PDT. No procedure-related deaths occurred.

Conclusions:

PDT was proved to be safe even in critically ill-patients treated with anticoagulant therapies. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy with a double-lumen endotracheal tube: a comparison of feasibility, gas exchange, and airway pressures

OBJECTIVE

Gas exchange and airway pressures are markedly altered during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT). A double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLET) has been developed for better airway management during PDT. The current study prospectively evaluated the in vivo feasibility, gas exchange, and airway pressures during PDT with DLET compared with a conventional endotracheal tube (ETT).

METHODS

According to eligibility criteria, patients were divided into a case group (those receiving PDT with DLET) and a control group (those receiving PDT with a conventional ETT). The Ciaglia single-dilator technique was used for PDT in both groups. The primary end point of this study was the feasibility of tracheostomy with DLET. The secondary end points were a comparison of gas exchange, airway pressures, minute volume, and tidal volume before, during, and after PDT performed with DLET and conventional ETT.

RESULTS

Ten patients meeting the inclusion criteria were assigned to each group. PDTs were performed without difficulties in nine patients in the DLET group and 10 patients in the conventional ETT group. During PDT, gas exchange, airway pressures, and minute ventilation remained more stable in the DLET group and were significantly different from those in the conventional ETT group.

CONCLUSIONS

PDT with DLET can be performed safely without difficulties limiting the technique. Furthermore, during PDT, the use of the DLET resulted in more stable gas exchange, airway pressures, and ventilation than PDT with a conventional ETT.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01691222; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.