Haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients admitted to intensive care units

High rates of mortality and technique failure in peritoneal dialysis patients after critical illness

INTRODUCTION

Little is known regarding the causes and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We explored the outcomes of technique failure and mortality in a cohort of PD patients admitted to the ICU.

METHODS

Using a provincial database of 990 incident PD patients followed from January 1997 to June 2009, we identified 90 (9%) who were admitted to the ICU. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate to determine differences in baseline characteristics. The Cox proportional hazards and competing risk methods were used to investigate associations.

RESULTS

Compared with other patients, those admitted to the ICU had been on PD longer (p < 0.0001) and were more often on continuous ambulatory PD (74.2% vs 25.8%, p = 0.016). Cardiac problems were the most common admitting diagnosis (50%), followed by sepsis (23%), with peritonitis accounting for 69% of the sepsis admissions. The 1-year mortality was 53.3%, with 12% alive and converted to hemodialysis, and one third remaining alive on PD. In multivariate Cox modeling, age [hazard ratio (HR): 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99 to 1.03], white blood cell count (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.04), temperature (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.92), and peritonitis (1.64; 95% CI: 1.21 to 2.22) at admission to the ICU were associated with the composite outcome of technique failure or death. In a competing risk analysis, the risk for death was 30%, and for technique failure, 36% at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on PD have high rates of death and technique failure after admission to the ICU.

Long-term outcomes of end-stage renal disease patients admitted to the ICU

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) have poor survival and high rates of readmission; however, little evidence exists on long-term outcomes. We set out to investigate the long-term (6 and 12 months) survival of ESRD patients admitted to the ICU and whether differential survival could be explained by dialysis modality and vascular access.

METHODS

We compared the admission characteristics, outcomes and readmission rates of 619 ESRD [95 peritoneal dialysis (PD), 334 hemodialysis with a catheter (HD CVC), 190 hemodialysis with an AV fistula (HD AVF)] patients admitted to 11 ICU's in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate to determine differences in baseline characteristics. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression was used to assess outcomes between the groups.

RESULTS

The 6- and 12-month crude survival was 62 and 52%, respectively. In a univariate model, modality and vascular access were associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) of death [PD HR 1.60 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-2.13, HD CVC HR 1.55 95% CI 1.25-1.93] compared to patients on HD with an AVF. In three different multivariate adjusted models, this association persisted with HRs for death of 1.63-1.75 for PD and 1.50-1.58 for HD CVC.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall long-term survival of ESRD patients after admission to the ICU is poor. Being on PD or being dialyzed with a catheter was independently associated with an increased mortality.

End-stage renal disease status and critical illness in the elderly

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Elderly patients (> 65 years old) are a rapidly growing demographic in the ESRD and intensive care unit (ICU) populations, yet the effect of ESRD status on critical illness in elderly patients remains unknown. Reliable estimates of prognosis would help to inform care and management of this frail and vulnerable population.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The effect of ESRD status on survival and readmission rates was examined in a retrospective cohort of 14,650 elderly patients (>65 years old) admitted to 11 ICUs in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada between 2000 and 2006. Logistic regression models were used to adjust odds of mortality and readmission to ICU for baseline case mix and illness severity.

RESULTS

Elderly ESRD patients had twofold higher crude in-hospital mortality (22% versus 13%, P < 0.0001) and readmission rate (6.4 versus 2.7%, P = 0.001). After adjustment for illness severity alone or illness severity and case mix, the odds ratio for mortality decreased to 0.85 (95% CI: 0.57 to 1.25) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.55 to 1.23), respectively. In contrast, ESRD status remained significantly associated with readmission to ICU after adjustment for other risk factors (OR 2.06 [95% CI: 1.32, 3.22]).

CONCLUSIONS

Illness severity on admission, rather than ESRD status per se, appears to be the main driver of in-hospital mortality in elderly patients. However, ESRD status is an independent risk factor for early and late readmission, suggesting that this population might benefit from alternative strategies for ICU discharge.

Outcome of patients with end stage renal disease admitted to an intensive care unit in India

AIMS

We sought to determine outcome and evaluate performance of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores upon admission in predicting 30-day mortality of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients admitted in ICU.

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study examined 73 consecutive ESRD patients admitted in an ICU of a tertiary care institute over 15 months. Primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Data on patient characteristics, reason for ICU admission, cause of ESRD, mode of renal replacement, and use of mechanical ventilation (MV) or inotropes were recorded. The APACHE 2 and SOFA scores were calculated based on admission characteristics.

RESULTS

First-day median APACHE II, SOFA, and APACHE II-predicted hospital mortality rates were 26 (14-49), 7 (4-17), and 56.9% (18.6-97.4%), respectively. Observed ICU and 30-day mortality rates were 27.4%, and 41.1%, respectively. During the ICU course, MV and inotropic support was required in 27 (37%) and 23 (35.1%) patients, respectively. Need for MV (p < 0.001) and inotropic support (p < 0.001) were predictors of 30-day mortality in univariate analysis. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve for APACHE II in predicting 30-day mortality was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.76-0.93) compared with 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97) for SOFA score (p = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome of ESRD patients admitted to ICU is poor, especially if they require other organ support. APACHE II and SOFA scores perform well as predictors of 30-day mortality.