1
|
Stubberud A, Borkenhagen S, Oteiza F, Dueland AN, Bugge C, Sæther EM, Tronvik E, Stovner LJ, Bjørk MH. Patterns of migraine medication use in Norway: A nationwide registry-based observational study. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024241268212. [PMID: 39149980 DOI: 10.1177/03331024241268212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to describe and discuss patterns of migraine medication use in the entire Norwegian population. METHODS In this nationwide, observational study, all individuals with a migraine-related prescription between 2010 and 2020 were identified using the Norwegian Prescription Database. The outcomes of interest were the incidence and 1-year prevalence of migraine medication users, as well as individuals with triptan overuse. Patterns of medication use were statistically compared between women and men adjusted for age, year of treatment start, comorbidities and county of residence calculating adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS We identified 327,904 migraine medication users. The incidence ranged from 0.39% to 0.46%, and the 1-year prevalence increased from 1.99% to 2.99%. Preventive use increased >50% during the study period. Preventives were significantly more often prescribed to women than to men (39.72% vs. 33.75%; aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.44). Triptan overuse was significantly more common among women, but women with overuse were more often using preventives, as compared to men (56.64% vs 52.69%; aOR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.49). CONCLUSION The prevalence of medically treated migraine is low. Overuse of triptans is frequent, especially among women. Clinicians should be encouraged to try out different triptans, recognize triptan overuse, and prescribe preventives when indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anker Stubberud
- NorHEAD Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Christoffer Bugge
- Oslo Economics, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Erling Tronvik
- NorHEAD Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Lars Jacob Stovner
- NorHEAD Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Marte-Helene Bjørk
- NorHEAD Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Albilali A, Al-Hashel J, Elchami Z, Al Rukn S, Al Madani AB, AlTunaiji M, Al Ali J, Fathy M, Joury J. Unmet Needs of Patients Living with Migraine in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries. Pain Ther 2024; 13:201-210. [PMID: 38280147 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00576-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The scale of migraine and its impact on the lives of patients in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries may be underestimated by healthcare professionals and the public and unmet needs in the provision of migraine medical care may exist. This article reports the key outcomes from a meeting of migraine specialists and their patients organised by the Emirates Neurology Society to learn more about the patient diagnosis and treatment journey and the extent to which migraine affects daily life. Patient stories indicate that the burden of migraine is underestimated, migraine is not generally recognised as a disease, delayed and incorrect diagnoses are common, and that achieving symptom control is often more a question of good luck rather than good management. Disease awareness campaigns are recommended to elevate societal understanding of migraine and reduce stigma toward patients affected by migraine. Recommendations for an improved healthcare system experience for patients affected by migraine include education initiatives targeting patients and physicians as well as initiatives to address gaps in the diagnosis and treatment of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulrazaq Albilali
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jasem Al-Hashel
- Department of Neurology, Ibn Sina Hospital, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Ziad Elchami
- Advanced Neuro-Musculoskeletal Care Center, Dr Samir Abbas Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Suhail Al Rukn
- Department of Neurology, Rashid Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Abu Baker Al Madani
- Department of Neurology, Rashid Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | | | | | - Mohamed Fathy
- Pfizer Gulf FZ LLC, Atlas Building, Dubai Media City, P.O. Box 502749, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Jean Joury
- Pfizer Gulf FZ LLC, Atlas Building, Dubai Media City, P.O. Box 502749, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rikos D, Vikelis M, Dermitzakis EV, Soldatos P, Rallis D, Rudolf J, Andreou AP, Argyriou AA. Reporting Quality and Risk of Bias Analysis of Published RCTs Assessing Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1964. [PMID: 38610729 PMCID: PMC11012539 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are vulnerable to many types of bias beyond randomization. Insights into the reporting quality of RCTs involving migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide system (anti-CGRP MAbs) are currently lacking. Our aim was to analyze the reporting quality of phase II/III RCTs involving migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. Methods: A systematic search was performed on the PubMed and EMBASE databases, according to PRISMA guidelines, for relevant RCTs in either episodic or chronic migraine prevention. Additionally, an adapted version of the 2010 CONSORT statement checklist was utilized. The ROBvis online tool was used to document the risk of bias. Results: From the initially identified 179 articles, we finally found 31 RCTs that were eligible for evaluation. The average CONSORT compliance was 88.7% (69.7-100%), while 93.5% (N = 29) of the articles had a compliance greater than 75%. Twenty-eight CONSORT items were reported in more than 75% of the articles. The average compliance of the analyzed RCTs was 93.9% for Galcanezumab, 91.3% for Fremanezumab, followed by 85.4% for Erenumab and Eptinezumab studies. Implementation of the ROB2 tool showed some concerning "missing information" arising from the inadequate reporting. Specifically, 50% of the studies (N = 16) were categorized as having inadequate information regarding the randomization process. Conclusions: Adequate reporting quality was disclosed in the evaluated RCTs with anti-CGRP MAbs in migraine prevention. However, some methodological issues need to be highlighted to be addressed in future studies assessing the efficacy of new molecules targeting CGRP or other candidate pathways implicated in migraine pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michail Vikelis
- Headache Clinic, Mediterraneo Hospital, 16675 Athens, Greece;
| | | | | | - Dimitrios Rallis
- Department of Neurology, Tzaneio General Hospital of Piraeus, 18536 Athens, Greece;
| | - Jobst Rudolf
- Department of Neurology, Papageorgiou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 54645 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Anna P. Andreou
- Headache Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK;
- Headache Research-Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE1 1LU, UK
| | - Andreas A. Argyriou
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Department of Neurology, Agios Andreas General Hospital of Patras, 26335 Patras, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pellesi L, Ashina M, Martelletti P. Targeting the PACAP-38 pathway is an emerging therapeutic strategy for migraine prevention. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2024; 29:57-64. [PMID: 38337150 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2024.2317778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38) has emerged as a key mediator of migraine pathogenesis. PACAP-38 and its receptors are predominantly distributed in arteries, sensory and parasympathetic neurons of the trigeminovascular system. Phase 2 trials have tested human monoclonal antibodies designed to bind and inhibit PACAP-38 and the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide type I (PAC1) receptor for migraine prevention. AREAS COVERED This review focuses on the significance of the PACAP-38 pathway as a target in migraine prevention. English peer-reviewed articles were searched in PubMed, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov electronic databases. EXPERT OPINION A PAC1 receptor monoclonal antibody was not effective for preventing migraine in a proof-of-concept trial, paving the way for alternative strategies to be considered. Lu AG09222 is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting PACAP-38 that was effective in preventing physiological responses of PACAP38 and reducing monthly migraine days in individuals with migraine. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the clinical utility, long-term safety and cost-effectiveness of therapies targeting the PACAP pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lanfranco Pellesi
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- School of Health Sciences, Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Argyriou AA, Dermitzakis EV, Rikos D, Xiromerisiou G, Soldatos P, Litsardopoulos P, Vikelis M. Effects of OnabotulinumtoxinA on Allodynia and Interictal Burden of Patients with Chronic Migraine. Toxins (Basel) 2024; 16:106. [PMID: 38393184 PMCID: PMC10891839 DOI: 10.3390/toxins16020106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We primarily aimed to ascertain whether treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) might influence the extent of the interictal burden and cutaneous allodynia in patients with chronic migraine (CM). METHODS Seventy CM patients, who received three consecutive cycles of BoNTA, were studied. The interictal burden was assessed with the Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4), while cutaneous allodynia was examined with the Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12) together with PI-NRS VAS to obtain hair brushing scores, and then these were compared from baseline (T0) to the last efficacy evaluation follow-up (T1). Efficacy outcomes, mostly mean headache days (MHD) and "Headache Impact Test" scores, were also assessed between T0 and T1. RESULTS BONTA improved the interictal burden, with a decrease in MIBS-4 scoring by an average of -7 at T1, compared to baseline (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with a moderate/severe interictal burden was substantially decreased. Likewise, BoNTA reduced the extent of cutaneous allodynia, with a significant reduction in both the ASC-12 (1 vs. 6; p < 0.001) and PI-NRS VAS (1 vs. 5; p < 0.001) to hair brushing median scores at T1, compared to baseline. Reduced MHD rates were significantly associated with a smaller interictal burden at T1. The efficacy of BoNTA, with a significant reduction in MHD and HIT-6 scores at T1 compared to T0, was re-confirmed. CONCLUSIONS BoNTA resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the interictal burden and also improved cutaneous allodynia. The reduction in ictal burden was associated with the down-scaling of the interictal burden. Hence, BoNTA improved the full spectrum of migraine impairment by diminishing the clinical expression of central sensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas A Argyriou
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Department of Neurology, Agios Andreas General Hospital of Patras, 26335 Patras, Greece
| | | | | | - Georgia Xiromerisiou
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Pantelis Litsardopoulos
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Department of Neurology, Agios Andreas General Hospital of Patras, 26335 Patras, Greece
| | - Michail Vikelis
- Headache Clinic, Mediterraneo Hospital, 16675 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Niiberg-Pikksööt T, Laas K, Aluoja A, Braschinsky M. Implementing a digital solution for patients with migraine-Developing a methodology for comparing digitally delivered treatment with conventional treatment: A study protocol. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2024; 3:e0000295. [PMID: 38421955 PMCID: PMC10903846 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Migraine is one of the most frequent and expensive neurological disease in the world. Non-pharmacological and digitally administered treatment options have long been used in the treatment of chronic pain and mental illness. Digital solutions increase the patients' possibilities of receiving evidence-based treatment even when conventional treatment options are limited. The main goal of the study is to assess the efficacy of interdisciplinary digital interventions compared to conventional treatment. The maximum number of participants in this multi-centre, open-label, prospective, randomized study is 600, divided into eight treatment groups. The participants will take part in either a conventional or a digital intervention, performing various tests and interdisciplinary tasks. The primary outcome is expected to be a reduction in the number of headache days. We also undertake to measure various other headache-related burdens as a secondary outcome. The sample size, digital interventions not conducted via video calls, the lack of human connection, limited intervention program, and the conducting of studies only in digitally sophisticated countries are all significant limitations. However, we believe that digitally mediated treatment options are at least as effective as traditional treatment options while also allowing for a significantly higher patient throughput. The future of chronic disease treatment is remote monitoring and high-quality digitally mediated interventions.The study is approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Tartu for Human Research (Permission No. 315T-17, 10.08.2020) and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NTC05458817 (14.07.2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Triinu Niiberg-Pikksööt
- Neurosciences, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Headache Clinic, Department of Neurology, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
- Migrevention OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Kariina Laas
- Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Anu Aluoja
- Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Psychiatry Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Mark Braschinsky
- Headache Clinic, Department of Neurology, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
- Migrevention OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia
- Neurology Clinic, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|