Calcitonin gene-related peptide causes migraine aura

Rimegepant and atogepant: novel drugs providing innovative opportunities in the management of migraine

INTRODUCTION

Rimegepant and atogepant, two innovative oral medications for the treatment of migraine, are gaining prominence in the treatment of migraine. However, outside of specialist headache centers, these novel medications remain subjectively underutilized. While multiple rationales exist describing their underutilization, a leading factor is the complexity and clinical flexibility attributed to the individual members of the gepant medication class.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a brief review of the current uses, common adverse events, and potential areas of future clinical innovation attributed to rimegepant and atogepant. A database search for the term 'Rimegepant OR Atogepant' was completed, yielding 240 individual results. Following multiple rounds of assessment that aimed to determine relevance of each individual result, 42 studies were included in the synthesis of this review.

EXPERT OPINION

Rimegepant and atogepant are exciting medications that demonstrate significant clinical innovation within the field of migraine therapy. While current indications are clear, data is lacking regarding the future expanded roles of these medications. Current areas of potential therapeutic innovation for rimegepant and atogepant include the pediatric population, in pregnancy and breastfeeding, in cluster headache and post-traumatic headache, and in patients that previously discontinued calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy.

Reduced neurovascular coupling of the visual network in migraine patients with aura as revealed with arterial spin labeling MRI: is there a demand-supply mismatch behind the scenes?

BACKGROUND

Although neuroimaging investigations have consistently demonstrated that "hyperresponsive" and "hyperconnected" visual cortices may represent the functional substrate of cortical spreading depolarization in patients with migraine with aura, the mechanisms which underpin the brain "tendency" to ignite the cortical spreading depolarization and, consequently, aura phenomenon are still matter of debate. Considering that triggers able to induce aura phenomenon constrain brain to increase global (such as physical activity, stressors and sleep abnormalities) or local (such as bright light visual stimulations) energy demand, a vascular supply unable to satisfy the increased energy requirement could be hypothesized in these patients.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with migraine with aura, 25 patients with migraine without aura and 20 healthy controls underwent a 3-Tesla MRI study. Cerebral blood flow and local functional connectivity (regional homogeneity) maps were obtained and registered to the MNI space where 100 cortical regions were derived using a functional local-global normative parcellation. A surrogate estimate of the regional neurovascular coupling for each subject was obtained at each parcel from the correlation coefficient between the z-scored ReHo map and the z-scored cerebral blood flow maps.

RESULTS

A significantly higher regional cerebral blood flow across the visual cortex of both hemispheres (i.e. fusiform and lingual gyri) was detected in migraine with aura patients when compared to patients with migraine without aura (p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). Concomitantly, a significantly reduced neurovascular coupling (p < 0.05, false discovery rate corrected) in the primary visual cortex parcel (VIS-4) of the large-scale visual network was observed in the left hemisphere of patients with migraine with aura (0.23±0.03), compared to both patients with migraine without aura (0.32±0.05) and healthy controls (0.29±0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Visual cortex neurovascular "decoupling" might represent the "link" between the exposure to trigger factors and aura phenomenon ignition. While physiological vascular oversupply may compensate neurovascular demand-supply at rest, it becomes inadequate in case of increased energy demand (e.g. when patients face with trigger factors) paving the way to the aura phenomenon ignition in patients with migraine with aura. Whether preventive treatments may exert their therapeutic activity on migraine with aura restoring the energy demands and cerebral blood flow trade-off within the visual network should be further investigated.

Efficacy of galcanezumab in proline-rich transmembrane protein 2 (PRRT2)-associated familial hemiplegic migraine: A case series

BACKGROUND

Familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) is a rare subtype of migraine with aura. Variants in calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 A (CACNA1A), ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 2 (ATP1A2), and sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 1 (SCN1A) genes have a well-established association with the development of FHM. Recent studies suggest that other genes may also have a significant role in the pathogenesis of FHM, including proline-rich transmembrane protein 2 (PRRT2). To our knowledge, there are currently no documented reports of the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide in FHM caused by a specific identified genetic mutation - and in particular not in FHM associated with PRRT2 mutations. The aim of our work is to describe the efficacy of galcanezumab as a prophylaxis treatment on patients from an Italian family consisting of six patient carriers of a PRRT2 pathogenic variant.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria for treatment eligibility consisted of a confirmed diagnosis of genetically confirmed FHM as defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition, number of headache days/month ≥4, and at least two previously failed migraine prophylaxis treatments. We evaluated clinical data of patients treated with galcanezumab regarding number of headache days/month, frequency of aura, disability caused by HM using the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), attack severity through a numerical rating scale (NRS), acute medications intake, and response to acute medications at baseline (t0) and after 3 (t1) and 6 (t2) months of treatment.

RESULTS

Three out of six family members met inclusion criteria for treatment with galcanezumab. The average number of headache days/month, acute medications, and MIDAS significantly decreased in all treated patients, as well as the average NRS score. Aura frequency reduced by ≥50% compared to the baseline in all three patients. No adverse events related to galcanezumab were reported.

CONCLUSION

Galcanezumab is a valid and well-tolerated treatment option in PRRT2-associated FHM.

Hypersensitivity to CGRP as a predictive biomarker of migraine prevention with erenumab

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to investigate the predictive value of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-induced migraine attacks for effectiveness to erenumab treatment in people with migraine.

METHODS

In total, 139 participants with migraine underwent a single experimental day involving a 20-min infusion with CGRP. Following this, the participants entered a 24-week treatment period with erenumab. The primary endpoints were the predictive value of CGRP-induced migraine attacks on the effectiveness of erenumab, defined as ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days, or ≥ 50% reduction in either monthly migraine or monthly headache days of moderate to severe intensity.

RESULTS

Among participants with CGRP-induced migraine attacks, 60 of 99 (61%) achieved ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days during weeks 13-24 with erenumab. Conversely, 13 of 25 (52%) where CGRP infusion did not induce a migraine achieved the same endpoint (p = 0.498). There were no significant differences between the ≥50% reduction in either monthly migraine or monthly headache days of moderate to severe intensity between CGRP-sensitive and non-sensitive participants (p = 0.625).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the CGRP-provocation model cannot be used to predict erenumab's effectiveness. It remains uncertain whether this finding extends to other monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP ligand or to gepants.Trial Registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04592952).

Anti-calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine: Focus on Clinical Pharmacokinetics

The calcitonin gene-related peptide transmission was the target for recent development of drugs that effectively prevent attacks of both episodic and chronic migraine. The aim of this narrative review was to offer deeper insight into pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies approved for prevention of migraine attacks. For this narrative review, relevant literature was searched for in MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases, covering periods 1966-2023 and 2006-2023, respectively. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was also searched for relevant clinical studies whose results had not been published previously in medical journals, covering the period 2000-2023. The monoclonal antibodies from this group are distributed mainly in the plasma and part of the extracellular space; they are neither metabolized in the liver nor excreted via the kidneys. The elimination of galcanezumab, eptinezumab and fremanezumab takes place only by a non-specific linear process via the reticuloendothelial system in the liver, while erenumab is eliminated by a non-specific process and by a specific, saturable process because of binding to receptors located on the cell membrane. Since the elimination processes do not have a large capacity, the half-life is about 2 weeks for erenumab and about 4 weeks for other monoclonal antibodies. Variability in the pharmacokinetics of these monoclonal antibodies is small in different subpopulations, and body weight is the only parameter to consider when choosing the dose of these drugs.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide: a possible biomarker in migraine patients with patent foramen ovale

BACKGROUND

Serum CGRP has been found to increase during migraine attack. However, whether CGRP can identify MA with PFO subtypes in MA remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the differential expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) between migraine (MA) patients with and without patent foramen ovale (PFO), and to evaluate the predictive value of CGRP for MA with PFO.

METHODS

A total of 153 patients with MA, 51 patients with PFO and 102 patients without. Venous blood was drawn and HIT-6 score was calculated during the onset of MA, and blood routine, inflammatory indexes and serum CGRP were detected. The differences in serum markers and HIT-6 scores were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors of MA with PFO were determined by univariate and multivariate logistics regression. Furthermore, the correlation between CGRP level with right-to-left shunt (RLS) grades and headache impact test-6 (HIT-6) score in MA patients with PFO were assessed. Independent risk factors were screened out by multivariate Logistic regression analysis. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to analyze the diagnostic value of these risk factors in MA complicated with PFO.

RESULTS

The serum CGRP level and HIT-6 scores in the MA with PFO group were significantly higher than those in the MA group (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that CGRP was an independent risk factor for MA with PFO (OR = 1.698, 95% CI = 1.325-2.179, P < 0.001). CGRP values ​​increased with the increase of RLS grade(Spearmen rho = 0.703, P < 0.001). Furthermore, a positive correlation between CGRP and HIT-6 scores was found (Spearmen rho = 0.227; P = 0.016). ROC curve showed that the optimal cut-off value for diagnosing MA with PFO was 79 pg/mL, the area under the curve (AUC) for predicting MA with PFO was 0.845, with 72.55% sensitivity and 78.43% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

MA patients with PFO have higher serum CGRP level. elevated CGRP concentration was associated with higher RLS grade and increased HIT-6 score. Higher serum CGRP level has certain clinical value in predicting PFO in MA patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhuhai Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine (Ethics batch number: 20,201,215,005).

Are anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies effective in treating migraine aura? A pilot prospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

About 15% to one third of migraineurs experience aura symptoms. Aura is a reversible focal neurological phenomenon involving visual, sensory, speech, and motor symptoms that usually precede migraine pain. Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin-related peptide (anti- CGRP mAbs) are effective in preventing chronic and episodic migraine, but little is known about their effectiveness on specifically preventing migraine with aura.

METHODS

This is a pilot prospective observational cohort study, aiming at evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Erenumab, Fremanezumab or Galcanezumab for the treatment of migraine aura. We enrolled 14 patients at the Headache Centre of University Federico II of Naples. Duration of follow-up was 12 months. We assessed mean monthly days with aura symptoms, with or without subsequent headache, as well as mean monthly days with headache and mean monthly MIDAS score, by reviewing standardized paper patient headache diaries every three months.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in mean monthly aura days was observed throughout the observation period (median baseline: 13, interquartile range: 4-16; after 12 months: 1, interquartile range: 0-3, p < 0.001). We observed a statistically significant decrease in mean monthly headache days as well (median baseline 21, interquartile range: 16-30; after 12 months: 5, interquartile range: 4-7, p < 0.001). During the 12-month treatment period, none of the 14 patients reported mild or serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that anti-CGRP mAbs are highly effective in migraine with aura, both in reducing mean monthly aura days and mean monthly days with headache.

Investigations of the migraine-provoking effect of levcromakalim in patients with migraine with aura

BACKGROUND/HYPOTHESIS

Experimental provocation studies have yielded important insights in migraine pathophysiology. Levcromakalim has been previously shown to induce migraine-like attacks with and without aura. In this study, we aim to further explore the migraine aura-inducing potential of levcromakalim.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over study, 27 adult participants with migraine with aura received intravenous infusions of levcromakalim and saline. Headache, aura and associated symptoms were evaluated for 24 hours following administration of the study drug. The primary endpoint was occurrence of migraine-like attacks with or without aura in the 24-hour observation period.

RESULTS

Thirteen participants developed migraine-like attacks on the active day only (P = 0.0098), and four participants developed aura on the active day only (P = 0.68). The median time to onset of migraine-like headache was three hours, and the median time to onset of aura was 27.5 minutes.

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

Our findings affirm the potent migraine-inducing effect of levcromakalim. We observed a lower induction-rate of migraine aura than previously reported. Further studies are warranted to identify predictors of migraine aura following levcromakalim.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT04905654.

Clinical features of migraine with aura: a REFORM study

BACKGROUND

About one-third of persons with migraine experience transient neurologic symptoms, referred to as aura. Despite its widespread prevalence, comprehensive clinical descriptions of migraine with aura remain sparse. Therefore, we aimed to provide an in-depth phenotypic analysis of aura symptoms and characteristics in a cross-sectional study of a large sample of adults diagnosed with migraine with aura.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the baseline characteristics of participants in the Registry for Migraine (REFORM) study - a single-center, prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Participants were adults diagnosed with migraine aura, reporting ≥ 4 monthly migraine days in the preceding 3 months. Trained personnel conducted in-person semi-structured interviews, capturing details on the nature, duration, localization, and progression of individual aura symptoms.

RESULTS

Of the 227 enrolled participants with migraine with aura, the mean age was 41.1 years, with a predominant female representation (n = 205 [90.3%]). Visual aura was present in 215 (94.7%) participants, somatosensory aura in 81 (35.7%), and speech and/or language aura in 31 (13.7%). A single type of aura was observed in 148 (65.2%) participants, whilst 79 (34.8%) reported multiple aura types. Most participants (n = 220 [96.9%]) described their aura symptoms as positive or gradually spreading. Headache in relation to aura was noted by 218 (96.0%) participants, with 177 (80.8%) stating that the onset of aura symptoms preceded the onset of headache.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers a detailed clinical depiction of persons with migraine with aura, who were predominantly enrolled from a tertiary care unit. The findings highlight potential gaps in the available literature on migraine with aura and should bolster clinicians' acumen in diagnosing migraine with aura in clinical settings.

Targeting CGRP pathways and aura: A peripheral site with a central effect

Targeting CGRP-pathways has substantially expanded our options for treating individuals with migraine. Although the efficacy of these drugs on migraine aura is yet to be fully revealed, it seems from existing studies that CGRP antagonism reduces the number of migraine auras. The present perspective summarizes the evidence linking CGRP to the migraine aura and proposes a model by which targeting the CGRP-pathways and, thus, inhibition the interaction between C- and Aδ-trigeminal fibers might reverse a possible high cortical glutamate level leading to a reduced number of migraine auras.