Open technique for supra-acetabular pin placement in pelvic external fixation: a cadaveric study

[Research progress of pubic symphysis diastasis]

Objective

To review the research progress of pubic symphysis diastasis and provide effective reference for orthopedic surgeons in the diagnosis and treatment of pubic symphysis diastasis.

Methods

The anatomy, injury mechanism, treatment, and other aspects of pubic symphysis diastasis were summarized and analyzed by reviewing the relevant research literature at domestically and internationally in recent years.

Results

The incidence of pubic symphysis diastasis is high in pelvic fractures, which is caused by the injury of the ligaments and fibrocartilage disc around the pubic symphysis by external force. The treatment plan should be individualized according to the pelvic stability and the needs of patients, aiming to restore the stability and integrity of the pelvis and improve the quality of life of patients after surgery.

Conclusion

At present, the research on pubic symphysis diastasis still needs to be improved. In the future, high-quality, multi-center, and large-sample studies are of great significance for the selection of treatment methods and the evaluation of effectiveness for patients with pubic symphysis diastasis.

Outcomes of supra-acetabular pin placement with and without fluoroscopic assisted: a prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of fluoroscopic-assisted supra-acetabular pin placement percutaneous technique versus the open technique in traumatic pelvic fractures.

METHODS

Prospective randomized controlled trial was performed at Maharat Nakhon ratchasima hospital from January 2020 to March 2021. Time, size of wound, and position of supra-acetabular pin were recorded intraoperatively. Pin positions were confirmed and measured by postoperative CT scan. Complications such as cortex penetration, infection, hip joint violation, and lateral thigh numbness were recorded at 2 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (40 hemipelvis) were randomized to fluoroscopic-assisted and non-fluoroscopic groups. Time taken for supra-acetabular pin placement for fluoroscopic-assisted and non-fluoroscopic-assisted groups was 211 and 522 s, respectively (P value < 0.001). Average wound size was 2.81 cm in the fluoroscopic-assisted group and 6.01 cm in the non-fluoroscopic-assisted group (P value < 0.001). Overall complications were similar in both groups with higher infection rates in the fluoroscopic-assisted group (5 and 0%, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Pelvic fracture is a life-threatening condition, which requires emergency pelvic stabilization. This study examined operative times for supra-acetabular placement and complication rates. The results show shorter operative times for the non-fluoroscopic-assisted technique without significant differences in complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Non-fluoroscopic technique greatly reduced operative times for supra-acetabular pin placement with comparable safety to the fluoroscopic-assisted technique.

Arterial angioembolisation versus pre-peritoneal pelvic packing in haemodynamically unstable patients with complex pelvic fractures: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Angioembolisation (AE) and/or pre-peritoneal pelvic packing (PPP) may be necessary for patients with complex pelvic fractures who are haemodynamically unstable. However, it remains unclear whether AE or PPP should be performed as an initial intervention and ongoing debates exist. This meta-analysis aimed to compare AE versus PPP in haemodynamically unstable patients with acute pelvic fractures. The primary outcomes of interest were to compare in-hospital mortality rate and number of blood units transfused. Secondary outcomes included evaluating differences in the time from diagnosis to treatment, as well as the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital.

METHODS

All clinically relevant studies comparing AE versus PPP in patients with complex pelvic fractures and haemodynamic instability were accessed. The 2020 PRISMA guidelines were followed. In September 2023, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Embase, without constraint.

RESULTS

Data from 320 patients were collected (AE: 174; PPP: 146). The mean age on admission was 47.4 ± 7.2 years. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) on admission was 43.5 + 5.4 points. Baseline comparability was observed in ISS (P = 0.5, Table 3) and mean age (P = 0.7, Table 3). No difference was reported in mortality rate (P = 0.2) or rate of blood units transfused (P = 0.3). AE had a longer mean time to the procedure of 44.6 min compared to PPP (P = 0.04). The mean length of ICU and hospital stay were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite the longer mean time from admission to the procedure, no significant differences were found between AE and PPP in terms of in-hospital mortality, blood units transfused, or length of ICU, and hospital stay. These findings should be interpreted considering the limitations of the present study. High-quality comparative research is strongly warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, meta-analysis.