Does the pronator-sparing approach improve functional outcome, compared to a standard volar approach, in volar plating of distal radius fractures? A prospective, randomized controlled trial

Pronator quadratus preserving versus pronator quadratus dissecting approaches in volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures: a systematic review of comparative studies

PURPOSE

To compare pronator quadratus preserving (PQ-P) approaches with PQ dissecting (PQ-D) approaches in volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures (DRFs).

METHODS

Three databases were searched on March 10th, 2024. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Data on demographics, fracture classifications, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion, radiographic parameters, and complications were extracted.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with a total of 1007 fractures were included. Two of three studies reported lower DASH scores in the PQ-P group between 6 weeks and 3 months postoperative, however no studies reported lower scores in the PQ-P group after 3 months. Three of three studies reported significantly lower VAS scores at 6 weeks postoperative, however no studies reported significant differences after 6 months. Only one of six studies reported significantly greater flexion, extension, and pronation in the PQ-P group. One of four studies reported greater radial deviation in the PQ-P group, while there were no differences in supination or ulnar deviation. One of ten and one of six studies reported greater volar tilt and ulnar variance or radial length, respectively, in the PQ-P group.

CONCLUSION

There is not sufficient evidence supporting the utility of PQ-P approaches over conventional PQ-D approaches for volar plate fixation of DRFs, especially at long-term follow-ups (3+ months). There may be short term benefits with PQ-P approaches, specifically with regards to PROMs in the short-term (< 6 weeks), however there is limited high-quality evidence supporting these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The Outcome of under 10 mm Single-Incision Surgery Using a Non-Specialized Volar Plate in Distal Radius Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

The distal radius fracture is a common orthopedic injury. We aimed to share the surgical steps and investigate the outcomes of treating distal radius fractures with wounds ≤10 mm using a globally accessible locking plate.

METHODS

We collected 46 patients who underwent surgery via a <10 mm wound, with a control group consisting of 40 patients who underwent conventional procedures. Both groups were treated using the same volar plate. We compared the radiographic reduction quality, including volar tilt angle, radial inclination angle, and ulna variance. Additionally, clinical outcomes, such as pain assessed using VAS, Q-Dash score, and PRWE, were evaluated. Patient satisfaction with the wound was also analyzed. The follow-up time for the clinical outcomes was 24.2 ± 13.47 months.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the quality of reduction in parameters such as the volar tilt angle (p = 0.762), radial inclination angle (p = 0.986), and ulna variance (p = 0.166). Both groups exhibited comparable results in pain VAS (p = 0.684), Q-Dash score (p = 0.08), and PRWE (p = 0.134). The ≤10 mm incision group displayed an increase in satisfaction with the wound (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treating distal radius fractures with a <10 mm wound using a non-specialized locking plate is a feasible approach. It does not compromise the quality of fracture reduction or functional scores and improves wound satisfaction.