2
|
Pur DR, Krance SH, Pucchio A, Miranda RN, Felfeli T. Current uses of artificial intelligence in the analysis of biofluid markers involved in corneal and ocular surface diseases: a systematic review. Eye (Lond) 2023; 37:2007-2019. [PMID: 36380089 PMCID: PMC10333344 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02307-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Corneal and ocular surface diseases (OSDs) carry significant psychosocial and economic burden worldwide. We set out to review the literature on the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and bioinformatics for analysis of biofluid biomarkers in corneal and OSDs and evaluate their utility in clinical decision making. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science were systematically queried for articles using AI or bioinformatics methodology in corneal and OSDs and examining biofluids from inception to August 2021. In total, 10,264 articles were screened, and 23 articles consisting of 1058 individuals were included. Using various AI/bioinformatics tools, changes in certain tear film cytokines that are proinflammatory such as increased expression of apolipoprotein, haptoglobin, annexin 1, S100A8, S100A9, Glutathione S-transferase, and decreased expression of supportive tear film components such as lipocalin-1, prolactin inducible protein, lysozyme C, lactotransferrin, cystatin S, and mammaglobin-b, proline rich protein, were found to be correlated with pathogenesis and/or treatment outcomes of dry eye, keratoconus, meibomian gland dysfunction, and Sjögren's. Overall, most AI/bioinformatics tools were used to classify biofluids into diseases subgroups, distinguish between OSD, identify risk factors, or make predictions about treatment response, and/or prognosis. To conclude, AI models such as artificial neural networks, hierarchical clustering, random forest, etc., in conjunction with proteomic or metabolomic profiling using bioinformatics tools such as Gene Ontology or Kyoto Encylopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis, were found to inform biomarker discovery, distinguish between OSDs, help define subgroups with OSDs and make predictions about treatment response in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daiana Roxana Pur
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Saffire H Krance
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Aidan Pucchio
- School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Rafael N Miranda
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tina Felfeli
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- The Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Franks PW, Melén E, Friedman M, Sundström J, Kockum I, Klareskog L, Almqvist C, Bergen SE, Czene K, Hägg S, Hall P, Johnell K, Malarstig A, Catrina A, Hagström H, Benson M, Gustav Smith J, Gomez MF, Orho-Melander M, Jacobsson B, Halfvarson J, Repsilber D, Oresic M, Jern C, Melin B, Ohlsson C, Fall T, Rönnblom L, Wadelius M, Nordmark G, Johansson Å, Rosenquist R, Sullivan PF. Technological readiness and implementation of genomic-driven precision medicine for complex diseases. J Intern Med 2021; 290:602-620. [PMID: 34213793 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The fields of human genetics and genomics have generated considerable knowledge about the mechanistic basis of many diseases. Genomic approaches to diagnosis, prognostication, prevention and treatment - genomic-driven precision medicine (GDPM) - may help optimize medical practice. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of GDPM of complex diseases across major medical specialties. We focus on technological readiness: how rapidly a test can be implemented into health care. Although these areas of medicine are diverse, key similarities exist across almost all areas. Many medical areas have, within their standards of care, at least one GDPM test for a genetic variant of strong effect that aids the identification/diagnosis of a more homogeneous subset within a larger disease group or identifies a subset with different therapeutic requirements. However, for almost all complex diseases, the majority of patients do not carry established single-gene mutations with large effects. Thus, research is underway that seeks to determine the polygenic basis of many complex diseases. Nevertheless, most complex diseases are caused by the interplay of genetic, behavioural and environmental risk factors, which will likely necessitate models for prediction and diagnosis that incorporate genetic and non-genetic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P W Franks
- From the, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Diabetes Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - E Melén
- Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Friedman
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Sundström
- Department of Cardiology, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden.,George Institute for Global Health, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - I Kockum
- Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Klareskog
- Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Almqvist
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S E Bergen
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - K Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Hägg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - K Johnell
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Malarstig
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Pfizer, Worldwide Research and Development, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Catrina
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Hagström
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Hepatology, Department of Upper GI, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Benson
- Department of Pediatrics, Linkopings Universitet, Linkoping, Sweden.,Division of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Gustav Smith
- Department of Cardiology and Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Gothenburg University and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M F Gomez
- From the, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Diabetes Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - M Orho-Melander
- From the, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Diabetes Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - B Jacobsson
- Division of Health Data and Digitalisation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Genetics and Bioinformatics, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - J Halfvarson
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - D Repsilber
- Functional Bioinformatics, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - M Oresic
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.,Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, FI, Finland
| | - C Jern
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - B Melin
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå Universitet, Umeå, Sweden
| | - C Ohlsson
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, CBAR, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Drug Treatment, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - T Fall
- Department of Medical Sciences, Molecular Epidemiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - L Rönnblom
- Department of Medical Sciences, Rheumatology & Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - M Wadelius
- Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Pharmacogenomics & Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - G Nordmark
- Department of Medical Sciences, Rheumatology & Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Å Johansson
- Institute for Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - R Rosenquist
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P F Sullivan
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lombó M, Ruiz-Díaz S, Gutiérrez-Adán A, Sánchez-Calabuig MJ. Sperm Metabolomics through Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:ani11061669. [PMID: 34205204 PMCID: PMC8227655 DOI: 10.3390/ani11061669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1 H-NMR) is of special interest for the analysis of metabolites present in seminal plasma and spermatozoa. This metabolomic approach has been used to identify the presence of new biomarkers or their proportions in a non-invasive manner and is, therefore, an interesting tool for male fertility diagnosis. In this paper, we review current knowledge of the use of 1 H-NMR to examine sperm metabolomics in different species with special attention paid to humans and farm animals. We also describe the use of 1 H-NMR to establish a possible relationship between the mammalian diet and the presence of certain hydrophilic and lipophilic metabolites in spermatozoa. Abstract This report reviews current knowledge of sperm metabolomics analysis using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1 H-NMR) with particular emphasis on human and farm animals. First, we present the benefits of NMR over other techniques to identify sperm metabolites and then describe the specific methodology required for NMR sperm analysis, stressing the importance of analyzing metabolites extracted from both the hydrophilic and lipophilic phases. This is followed by a description of advances produced to date in the use of NMR to diagnose infertility in humans and to identify metabolic differences among the sperm of mammalian herbivore, carnivore, and omnivore species. This last application of NMR mainly seeks to explore the possible use of lipids to fuel sperm physiology, contrary to previous theories that glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) are the only sources of sperm energy. This review describes the use of NMR to identify sperm and seminal plasma metabolites as possible indicators of semen quality, and to examine the metabolites needed to maintain sperm motility, induce their capacitation, and consequently, to predict animal fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Lombó
- Department of Animal Reproduction, INIA, Av. Puerta de Hierro, 18, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (M.L.); (S.R.-D.); (A.G.-A.)
| | - Sara Ruiz-Díaz
- Department of Animal Reproduction, INIA, Av. Puerta de Hierro, 18, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (M.L.); (S.R.-D.); (A.G.-A.)
- Mistral Fertility Clinics S.L., Clínica Tambre, 28002 Madrid, Spain
| | - Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán
- Department of Animal Reproduction, INIA, Av. Puerta de Hierro, 18, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (M.L.); (S.R.-D.); (A.G.-A.)
| | - María-Jesús Sánchez-Calabuig
- Department of Animal Reproduction, INIA, Av. Puerta de Hierro, 18, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (M.L.); (S.R.-D.); (A.G.-A.)
- Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University Complutense of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|