Correlation of prostate volume with severity of lower urinary tract symptoms as measured by international prostate symptoms score and maximum urine flow rate among patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

One-year outcomes after prostate artery embolization versus laser enucleation: A network meta-analysis

Background

Although holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) is considered a size-independent procedure for treatment of an enlarged prostate, prostate artery embolization (PAE) is emerging as an alternative modality to treat moderate and large benign prostatic hyperplasia. This study aims to compare the early post-operative and short-term efficacy of PAE and HoLEP.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases were searched. Network meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA-N-guidelines. Post-operative parameters analysed include international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), post-void residual urine (PVR), maximal uroflow rate (Qmax) and serious adverse events (SAE). Random effects model calculated weighted mean differences (WMD). If 95%CI crossed the line of no effect (WMD = 0), evidence indicated no statistically significant difference between treatments compared.

Results

Qualitative and quantitative syntheses included 20 and 18 studies with 1991 and 1606 patients, respectively. At 3 months, there was no statistically significant difference between PAE and HoLEP in IPSS score improvement [WMD: -2.21: 95%CI: (-10.20, 5.78), favouring PAE], QoL score improvement [WMD: -0.22:95%CI: (-1.75, 1.32), favouring PAE] and PVR improvement [WMD: 26.97: 95%CI: (-59.53, 113.48), favouring HoLEP]. However, PAE was found inferior to HoLEP for Qmax improvement [WMD: 8.47, 95%CI: (2.89, 14.05), favouring HoLEP]. At 1-year follow-up, there was no statistically significant was found between PAE and HoLEP for IPSS score improvement [WMD:6.03, 95%CI: (-1.30, 13.35)], QoL score improvement [WMD: 0.03, 95%CI: (-1.19, 1.25)], PVR improvement [WMD:4.11, 95%CI: (-32.31, 40.53)] and Qmax improvement [WMD:2.60, 95%CI: (-2.20, 7.41)] with all differences favouring HoLEP. PAE was superior to HoLEP for SAE [PAE vs. HoLEP-OR: 0.68, 95%CI: (0.25, 1.37)].

Conclusion

HoLEP was superior to PAE at 3 months for Qmax improvement. There was no significant difference in IPSS, QoL, PVR and Qmax improvement at 1 year between PAE and HoLEP. PAE was also associated with lesser SAE compared to HoLEP. Studies on the long-term outcome of PAE are needed to establish the durability of early outcomes after PAE.

Change in Prostate Volume and Symptom Improvement in Men Treated With Rezūm Water Vapor Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the change in prostate volume (PV) and relationship to improvement in urinary symptom scores following Rezūm therapy.

METHODS

Quality of life outcomes and PV were assessed at baseline and 12months postprocedure. Percent change from baseline in outcomes and PV were calculated, as was the number of Rezum injection to baseline PV ratio. Association between total number of injections and changes in outcomes and PV were evaluated using linear regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 49 men (mean age=67.8; standard deviation=9.4) underwent the procedure between April 2019 and September 2020, with a median baseline PV of 71.5 cc (range 24-150) and median number of vapor injections of 11.0 (range 4-21). At 12months, the median percent change in PV was - 34.0% (interquartile range: -49.2%, -16.7%), with 45/49 (91.8%) patients having reduced volume. Among the 45 patients with reduced volume at 12months, every 10% increase in volume reduction was associated with a 7.5% (95% confidence interval, 1.4%-13.6%; P = .02) improvement in the International Prostate Symptom Score. There was no significant association between total number of injections or injection to baseline volume ratio and change in PV.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of men treated with Rezūm therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, it was demonstrated that there is a correlation between greater PV reduction and greater symptomatic improvement. This study showed no association between more injections or the ratio of injections to PV changes, refuting the claim that more injections are better.

Serum prostate specific antigen is a good indicator of prostatic volume in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common cause of bladder outlet obstruction in men over the age of 50 years. An association between the prostate specific antigen (PSA), International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) and prostate volume (PV) may be instrumental in determining patients who may benefit from treatment. Targeted therapy will reduce the cost of care because it is unwise to treat all men with prostate enlargement to prevent complications when the risk of occurrence is negligible.

AIM

To determine the correlation between the PSA, IPSS and PV in men of African descent.

SETTING

This was a cross sectional analysis involving 92 patients diagnosed as having symptomatic BPH at the Ho Teaching Hospital.

METHODS

The data were collected using standardised questionnaires. The IPSS determined urinary symptom severity. The PV was determined using a transabdominal ultrasound machine. Serum PSA was retrieved from the electronic medical records.

RESULTS

The mean PV was 61.04 cm3 ± 21.95 cm3, the mean PSA was 4.21 ng/mL ± 3.85 ng/mL, and mean IPSS of 21.59 ± 3.78. The Pearson's correlation between PV and PSA was 0.283 (p = 0.01), between PV and IPSS was 0.108 (p = 0.30), and finally, between Serum PSA and IPSS Score was -0.086 (p = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that serum PSA has a positive correlation with PV. However, IPSS had no significant association with PSA or PV in patients with BPH.Contribution: This study provides insights into the implications of clinical parameters on the management of prostate enlargement.