1
|
Ma H, Li H, Ge F, Zhao H, Zhu B, Zhang L, Gao H, Xu L, Li J, Wang Z. Improving Genomic Predictions in Multi-Breed Cattle Populations: A Comparative Analysis of BayesR and GBLUP Models. Genes (Basel) 2024; 15:253. [PMID: 38397242 PMCID: PMC10887749 DOI: 10.3390/genes15020253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Numerous studies have shown that combining populations from similar or closely related genetic breeds improves the accuracy of genomic predictions (GP). Extensive experimentation with diverse Bayesian and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) models have been developed to explore multi-breed genomic selection (GS) in livestock, ultimately establishing them as successful approaches for predicting genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of using BayesR and GBLUP models with linkage disequilibrium (LD)-weighted genomic relationship matrices (GRMs) for genomic prediction in three different beef cattle breeds to identify the best approach for enhancing the accuracy of multi-breed genomic selection in beef cattle. Additionally, a comparison was conducted to evaluate the predictive precision of different marker densities and genetic correlations among the three breeds of beef cattle. The GRM between Yunling cattle (YL) and other breeds demonstrated modest affinity and highlighted a notable genetic concordance of 0.87 between Chinese Wagyu (WG) and Huaxi (HX) cattle. In the within-breed GS, BayesR demonstrated an advantage over GBLUP. The prediction accuracies for HX cattle using the BayesR model were 0.52 with BovineHD BeadChip data (HD) and 0.46 with whole-genome sequencing data (WGS). In comparison to the GBLUP model, the accuracy increased by 26.8% for HD data and 9.5% for WGS data. For WG and YL, BayesR doubled the within-breed prediction accuracy to 14.3% from 7.1%, outperforming GBLUP across both HD and WGS datasets. Moreover, analyzing multiple breeds using genomic selection showed that BayesR consistently outperformed GBLUP in terms of predictive accuracy, especially when using WGS. For instance, in a mixed reference population of HX and WG, BayesR achieved a significant accuracy of 0.53 using WGS for HX, which was a substantial enhancement over the accuracies obtained with GBLUP models. The research further highlights the benefit of including various breeds in the reference group, leading to enhanced accuracy in predictions and emphasizing the importance of comprehensive genomic selection methods. Our research findings indicate that BayesR exhibits superior performance compared to GBLUP in multi-breed genomic prediction accuracy, achieving a maximum improvement of 33.3%, especially in genetically diverse breeds. The improvement can be attributed to the effective utilization of higher single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker density by BayesR, resulting in enhanced prediction accuracy. This evidence conclusively demonstrates the significant impact of BayesR on enhancing genomic predictions in diverse cattle populations, underscoring the crucial role of genetic relatedness in selection methodologies. In parallel, subsequent studies should focus on refining GRM and exploring alternative models for GP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoran Ma
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (H.M.); (H.L.); (L.Z.); (J.L.)
| | - Hongwei Li
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (H.M.); (H.L.); (L.Z.); (J.L.)
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB 510632, Canada
| | - Fei Ge
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (H.M.); (H.L.); (L.Z.); (J.L.)
| | - Huqiong Zhao
- College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
| | - Bo Zhu
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (H.M.); (H.L.); (L.Z.); (J.L.)
| | - Lupei Zhang
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (H.M.); (H.L.); (L.Z.); (J.L.)
| | - Huijiang Gao
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (H.M.); (H.L.); (L.Z.); (J.L.)
| | - Lingyang Xu
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (H.M.); (H.L.); (L.Z.); (J.L.)
| | - Junya Li
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (H.M.); (H.L.); (L.Z.); (J.L.)
| | - Zezhao Wang
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (H.M.); (H.L.); (L.Z.); (J.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hayes BJ, Copley J, Dodd E, Ross EM, Speight S, Fordyce G. Multi-breed genomic evaluation for tropical beef cattle when no pedigree information is available. Genet Sel Evol 2023; 55:71. [PMID: 37845626 PMCID: PMC10578004 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00847-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been challenging to implement genomic selection in multi-breed tropical beef cattle populations. If commercial (often crossbred) animals could be used in the reference population for these genomic evaluations, this could allow for very large reference populations. In tropical beef systems, such animals often have no pedigree information. Here we investigate potential models for such data, using marker heterozygosity (to model heterosis) and breed composition derived from genetic markers, as covariates in the model. Models treated breed effects as either fixed or random, and included genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and BayesR. A tropically-adapted beef cattle dataset of 29,391 purebred, crossbred and composite commercial animals was used to evaluate the models. RESULTS Treating breed effects as random, in an approach analogous to genetic groups allowed partitioning of the genetic variance into within-breed and across breed-components (even with a large number of breeds), and estimation of within-breed and across-breed genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). We demonstrate that moderately-accurate (0.30-0.43) GEBV can be calculated using these models. Treating breed effects as random gave more accurate GEBV than treating breed as fixed. A simple GBLUP model where no breed effects were fitted gave the same accuracy (and correlations of GEBV very close to 1) as a model where GEBV for within-breed and the GEBV for (random) across-breed effects were included. When GEBV were predicted for herds with no data in the reference population, BayesR resulted in the highest accuracy, with 3% accuracy improvement averaged across traits, especially when the validation population was less related to the reference population. Estimates of heterosis from our models were in line with previous estimates from beef cattle. A method for estimating the number of effective breed comparisons for each breed combination accumulated across contemporary groups is presented. CONCLUSIONS When no pedigree is available, breed composition and heterosis for inclusion in multi-breed genomic evaluation can be estimated from genotypes. When GEBV were predicted for herds with no data in the reference population, BayesR resulted in the highest accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben J Hayes
- Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia.
| | - James Copley
- Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia
| | - Elsie Dodd
- Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia
| | - Elizabeth M Ross
- Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia
| | - Shannon Speight
- Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia
- BlackBox Co, Mareeba, QLD, 4880, Australia
| | - Geoffry Fordyce
- Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jang S, Ros-Freixedes R, Hickey JM, Chen CY, Holl J, Herring WO, Misztal I, Lourenco D. Using pre-selected variants from large-scale whole-genome sequence data for single-step genomic predictions in pigs. Genet Sel Evol 2023; 55:55. [PMID: 37495982 PMCID: PMC10373252 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00831-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole-genome sequence (WGS) data harbor causative variants that may not be present in standard single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip data. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of using preselected variants from WGS for single-step genomic predictions in maternal and terminal pig lines with up to 1.8k sequenced and 104k sequence imputed animals per line. METHODS Two maternal and four terminal lines were investigated for eight and seven traits, respectively. The number of sequenced animals ranged from 1365 to 1491 for the maternal lines and 381 to 1865 for the terminal lines. Imputation to sequence occurred within each line for 66k to 76k animals for the maternal lines and 29k to 104k animals for the terminal lines. Two preselected SNP sets were generated based on a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Top40k included the SNPs with the lowest p-value in each of the 40k genomic windows, and ChipPlusSign included significant variants integrated into the porcine SNP chip used for routine genotyping. We compared the performance of single-step genomic predictions between using preselected SNP sets assuming equal or different variances and the standard porcine SNP chip. RESULTS In the maternal lines, ChipPlusSign and Top40k showed an average increase in accuracy of 0.6 and 4.9%, respectively, compared to the regular porcine SNP chip. The greatest increase was obtained with Top40k, particularly for fertility traits, for which the initial accuracy based on the standard SNP chip was low. However, in the terminal lines, Top40k resulted in an average loss of accuracy of 1%. ChipPlusSign provided a positive, although small, gain in accuracy (0.9%). Assigning different variances for the SNPs slightly improved accuracies when using variances obtained from BayesR. However, increases were inconsistent across the lines and traits. CONCLUSIONS The benefit of using sequence data depends on the line, the size of the genotyped population, and how the WGS variants are preselected. When WGS data are available on hundreds of thousands of animals, using sequence data presents an advantage but this remains limited in pigs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungbong Jang
- Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
| | - Roger Ros-Freixedes
- Departament de Ciència Animal, Universitat de Lleida-Agrotecnio-CERCA Center, Lleida, Spain
| | - John M Hickey
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, UK
| | - Ching-Yi Chen
- The Pig Improvement Company, Genus Plc, Hendersonville, TN, USA
| | - Justin Holl
- The Pig Improvement Company, Genus Plc, Hendersonville, TN, USA
| | | | - Ignacy Misztal
- Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Daniela Lourenco
- Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jang S, Ros-Freixedes R, Hickey JM, Chen CY, Herring WO, Holl J, Misztal I, Lourenco D. Multi-line ssGBLUP evaluation using preselected markers from whole-genome sequence data in pigs. Front Genet 2023; 14:1163626. [PMID: 37252662 PMCID: PMC10213539 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1163626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic evaluations in pigs could benefit from using multi-line data along with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) if the data are large enough to represent the variability across populations. The objective of this study was to investigate strategies to combine large-scale data from different terminal pig lines in a multi-line genomic evaluation (MLE) through single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) models while including variants preselected from whole-genome sequence (WGS) data. We investigated single-line and multi-line evaluations for five traits recorded in three terminal lines. The number of sequenced animals in each line ranged from 731 to 1,865, with 60k to 104k imputed to WGS. Unknown parent groups (UPG) and metafounders (MF) were explored to account for genetic differences among the lines and improve the compatibility between pedigree and genomic relationships in the MLE. Sequence variants were preselected based on multi-line genome-wide association studies (GWAS) or linkage disequilibrium (LD) pruning. These preselected variant sets were used for ssGBLUP predictions without and with weights from BayesR, and the performances were compared to that of a commercial porcine single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) chip. Using UPG and MF in MLE showed small to no gain in prediction accuracy (up to 0.02), depending on the lines and traits, compared to the single-line genomic evaluation (SLE). Likewise, adding selected variants from the GWAS to the commercial SNP chip resulted in a maximum increase of 0.02 in the prediction accuracy, only for average daily feed intake in the most numerous lines. In addition, no benefits were observed when using preselected sequence variants in multi-line genomic predictions. Weights from BayesR did not help improve the performance of ssGBLUP. This study revealed limited benefits of using preselected whole-genome sequence variants for multi-line genomic predictions, even when tens of thousands of animals had imputed sequence data. Correctly accounting for line differences with UPG or MF in MLE is essential to obtain predictions similar to SLE; however, the only observed benefit of an MLE is to have comparable predictions across lines. Further investigation into the amount of data and novel methods to preselect whole-genome causative variants in combined populations would be of significant interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungbong Jang
- Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| | - Roger Ros-Freixedes
- Departament de Ciència Animal, Universitat de Lleida-Agrotecnio-CERCA Center, Lleida, Spain
| | - John M. Hickey
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Ching-Yi Chen
- The Pig Improvement Company, Genus plc, Hendersonville, TN, United States
| | - William O. Herring
- The Pig Improvement Company, Genus plc, Hendersonville, TN, United States
| | - Justin Holl
- The Pig Improvement Company, Genus plc, Hendersonville, TN, United States
| | - Ignacy Misztal
- Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| | - Daniela Lourenco
- Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Johnsson M. Genomics in animal breeding from the perspectives of matrices and molecules. Hereditas 2023; 160:20. [PMID: 37149663 PMCID: PMC10163706 DOI: 10.1186/s41065-023-00285-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper describes genomics from two perspectives that are in use in animal breeding and genetics: a statistical perspective concentrating on models for estimating breeding values, and a sequence perspective concentrating on the function of DNA molecules. MAIN BODY This paper reviews the development of genomics in animal breeding and speculates on its future from these two perspectives. From the statistical perspective, genomic data are large sets of markers of ancestry; animal breeding makes use of them while remaining agnostic about their function. From the sequence perspective, genomic data are a source of causative variants; what animal breeding needs is to identify and make use of them. CONCLUSION The statistical perspective, in the form of genomic selection, is the more applicable in contemporary breeding. Animal genomics researchers using from the sequence perspective are still working towards this the isolation of causative variants, equipped with new technologies but continuing a decades-long line of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Johnsson
- Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7023, Uppsala, 75007, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wolf MJ, Neumann GB, Kokuć P, Yin T, Brockmann GA, König S, May K. Genetic evaluations for endangered dual-purpose German Black Pied cattle using 50K SNPs, a breed-specific 200K chip, and whole-genome sequencing. J Dairy Sci 2023; 106:3345-3358. [PMID: 37028956 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
Genetic evaluations of local cattle breeds are hampered due to small reference groups or biased due to the utilization of SNP effects estimated in other large populations. Against this background, there is a lack of studies addressing the possible advantage of whole-genome sequences (WGS) or consideration of specific variants from WGS data in genomic predictions for local breeds with small population size. Consequently, the aim of this study was to compare genetic parameters and accuracies of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for 305-d production traits, fat-to protein ratio (FPR), and somatic cell score (SCS) at the first test date after calving and confirmation traits of the endangered German Black Pied cattle (DSN) breed using 4 different marker panels: (1) the commercial 50K Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip, (2) a customized 200K chip designed for DSN (DSN200K) which considers the most important variants for DSN from WGS, (3) randomly generated 200K chips based on WGS data, and (4) a WGS panel. The same number of animals was considered for all marker panel analyses (i.e., 1,811 genotyped or sequenced cows for conformation traits, 2,383 cows for lactation production traits, and 2,420 cows for FPR and SCS). Mixed models for the estimation of genetic parameters directly included the respective genomic relationship matrix from the different marker panels plus the trait-specific fixed effects. For the calculation of GEBV accuracies, we applied repeated random subsampling validation. In the process of separate cross-validations per trait, we created a validation set including 20% of cows with masked phenotypes, and a training set comprising 80% of the cows. The cows were selected randomly in a procedure with 10 replicates considering replacements in the different scenarios. The accuracy was defined as the correlation between the direct GEBV and the phenotypes with subtracted corresponding fixed effects for the cows in the validation set. For FPR and SCS, as well as for lactation production traits, heritabilities were largest based on WGS data, but the increase compared with the 50K or DSN200K applications was quite small in the range from 0.01 to 0.03. Also, for most of the conformation traits, heritabilities were largest based on WGS and DSN200K data, but the increase was in the range of the corresponding standard error. Accordingly, GEBV accuracies for most of the studied traits were highest based on WGS data or when utilizing the DSN200K chip, but the accuracy differences across the marker panels were quite small and nonsignificant. In conclusion, WGS data and the DSN200K chip only contributed to minor improvements in genomic predictions, still justifying the use of the commercial 50K chip. Nevertheless, WGS and the 200KDSN chip harbor breed-specific variants, which are valuable for studying causal genetic mechanisms in the endangered DSN population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel J Wolf
- Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, 35390 Gießen, Germany
| | - Guilherme B Neumann
- Animal Breeding Biology and Molecular Genetics, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute for Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany
| | - Paula Kokuć
- Animal Breeding Biology and Molecular Genetics, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute for Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany
| | - Tong Yin
- Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, 35390 Gießen, Germany
| | - Gudrun A Brockmann
- Animal Breeding Biology and Molecular Genetics, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute for Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sven König
- Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, 35390 Gießen, Germany.
| | - Katharina May
- Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, 35390 Gießen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jones HE, Wilson PB. Progress and opportunities through use of genomics in animal production. Trends Genet 2022; 38:1228-1252. [PMID: 35945076 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The rearing of farmed animals is a vital component of global food production systems, but its impact on the environment, human health, animal welfare, and biodiversity is being increasingly challenged. Developments in genetic and genomic technologies have had a key role in improving the productivity of farmed animals for decades. Advances in genome sequencing, annotation, and editing offer a means not only to continue that trend, but also, when combined with advanced data collection, analytics, cloud computing, appropriate infrastructure, and regulation, to take precision livestock farming (PLF) and conservation to an advanced level. Such an approach could generate substantial additional benefits in terms of reducing use of resources, health treatments, and environmental impact, while also improving animal health and welfare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huw E Jones
- UK Genetics for Livestock and Equines (UKGLE) Committee, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, SW1P 3JR, UK; Nottingham Trent University, Brackenhurst Campus, Brackenhurst Lane, Southwell, NG25 0QF, UK.
| | - Philippe B Wilson
- UK Genetics for Livestock and Equines (UKGLE) Committee, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, SW1P 3JR, UK; Nottingham Trent University, Brackenhurst Campus, Brackenhurst Lane, Southwell, NG25 0QF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ros-Freixedes R, Johnsson M, Whalen A, Chen CY, Valente BD, Herring WO, Gorjanc G, Hickey JM. Genomic prediction with whole-genome sequence data in intensely selected pig lines. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION 2022; 54:65. [PMID: 36153511 PMCID: PMC9509613 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-022-00756-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background Early simulations indicated that whole-genome sequence data (WGS) could improve the accuracy of genomic predictions within and across breeds. However, empirical results have been ambiguous so far. Large datasets that capture most of the genomic diversity in a population must be assembled so that allele substitution effects are estimated with high accuracy. The objectives of this study were to use a large pig dataset from seven intensely selected lines to assess the benefits of using WGS for genomic prediction compared to using commercial marker arrays and to identify scenarios in which WGS provides the largest advantage. Methods We sequenced 6931 individuals from seven commercial pig lines with different numerical sizes. Genotypes of 32.8 million variants were imputed for 396,100 individuals (17,224 to 104,661 per line). We used BayesR to perform genomic prediction for eight complex traits. Genomic predictions were performed using either data from a standard marker array or variants preselected from WGS based on association tests. Results The accuracies of genomic predictions based on preselected WGS variants were not robust across traits and lines and the improvements in prediction accuracy that we achieved so far with WGS compared to standard marker arrays were generally small. The most favourable results for WGS were obtained when the largest training sets were available and standard marker arrays were augmented with preselected variants with statistically significant associations to the trait. With this method and training sets of around 80k individuals, the accuracy of within-line genomic predictions was on average improved by 0.025. With multi-line training sets, improvements of 0.04 compared to marker arrays could be expected. Conclusions Our results showed that WGS has limited potential to improve the accuracy of genomic predictions compared to marker arrays in intensely selected pig lines. Thus, although we expect that larger improvements in accuracy from the use of WGS are possible with a combination of larger training sets and optimised pipelines for generating and analysing such datasets, the use of WGS in the current implementations of genomic prediction should be carefully evaluated against the cost of large-scale WGS data on a case-by-case basis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12711-022-00756-0.
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Wolc A, Dekkers JCM. Application of Bayesian genomic prediction methods to genome-wide association analyses. Genet Sel Evol 2022; 54:31. [PMID: 35562659 PMCID: PMC9103490 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-022-00724-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bayesian genomic prediction methods were developed to simultaneously fit all genotyped markers to a set of available phenotypes for prediction of breeding values for quantitative traits, allowing for differences in the genetic architecture (distribution of marker effects) of traits. These methods also provide a flexible and reliable framework for genome-wide association (GWA) studies. The objective here was to review developments in Bayesian hierarchical and variable selection models for GWA analyses. Results By fitting all genotyped markers simultaneously, Bayesian GWA methods implicitly account for population structure and the multiple-testing problem of classical single-marker GWA. Implemented using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, Bayesian GWA methods allow for control of error rates using probabilities obtained from posterior distributions. Power of GWA studies using Bayesian methods can be enhanced by using informative priors based on previous association studies, gene expression analyses, or functional annotation information. Applied to multiple traits, Bayesian GWA analyses can give insight into pleiotropic effects by multi-trait, structural equation, or graphical models. Bayesian methods can also be used to combine genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and other -omics data to infer causal genotype to phenotype relationships and to suggest external interventions that can improve performance. Conclusions Bayesian hierarchical and variable selection methods provide a unified and powerful framework for genomic prediction, GWA, integration of prior information, and integration of information from other -omics platforms to identify causal mutations for complex quantitative traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Wolc
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 806 Stange Road, 239 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50010, USA.,Hy-Line International, 2583 240th Street, Dallas Center, IA, 50063, USA
| | - Jack C M Dekkers
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 806 Stange Road, 239 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martini JWR, Gao N, Crossa J. Incorporating Omics Data in Genomic Prediction. Methods Mol Biol 2022; 2467:341-357. [PMID: 35451782 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
In this chapter, we discuss the motivation for integrating other types of omics data into genomic prediction methods. We give an overview of literature investigating the performance of omics-enhanced predictions, and highlight potential pitfalls when applying these methods in breeding. We emphasize that the statistical methods available for genomic data can be transferred to the general omics case. However, when using a framework of omic relationship matrices, the standardization of the variables may be more relevant than it is for a genomic relationship matrix based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes W R Martini
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Veracruz, CP, Mexico.
| | - Ning Gao
- School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - José Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Veracruz, CP, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Long EM, Bradbury PJ, Romay MC, Buckler ES, Robbins KR. Genome-wide Imputation Using the Practical Haplotype Graph in the Heterozygous Crop Cassava. G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS 2021; 12:6423990. [PMID: 34751380 PMCID: PMC8728015 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Genomic applications such as genomic selection and genome-wide association have become increasingly common since the advent of genome sequencing. The cost of sequencing has decreased in the past two decades; however, genotyping costs are still prohibitive to gathering large datasets for these genomic applications, especially in nonmodel species where resources are less abundant. Genotype imputation makes it possible to infer whole-genome information from limited input data, making large sampling for genomic applications more feasible. Imputation becomes increasingly difficult in heterozygous species where haplotypes must be phased. The practical haplotype graph (PHG) is a recently developed tool that can accurately impute genotypes, using a reference panel of haplotypes. We showcase the ability of the PHG to impute genomic information in the highly heterozygous crop cassava (Manihot esculenta). Accurately phased haplotypes were sampled from runs of homozygosity across a diverse panel of individuals to populate PHG, which proved more accurate than relying on computational phasing methods. The PHG achieved high imputation accuracy, using sparse skim-sequencing input, which translated to substantial genomic prediction accuracy in cross-validation testing. The PHG showed improved imputation accuracy, compared to a standard imputation tool Beagle, especially in predicting rare alleles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Long
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Peter J Bradbury
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.,United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Robert W. Holley, Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - M Cinta Romay
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Edward S Buckler
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.,Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.,United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Robert W. Holley, Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Kelly R Robbins
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yoshida GM, Yáñez JM. Increased accuracy of genomic predictions for growth under chronic thermal stress in rainbow trout by prioritizing variants from GWAS using imputed sequence data. Evol Appl 2021; 15:537-552. [PMID: 35505881 PMCID: PMC9046923 DOI: 10.1111/eva.13240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Through imputation of genotypes, genome‐wide association study (GWAS) and genomic prediction (GP) using whole‐genome sequencing (WGS) data are cost‐efficient and feasible in aquaculture breeding schemes. The objective was to dissect the genetic architecture of growth traits under chronic heat stress in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and to assess the accuracy of GP based on imputed WGS and different preselected single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays. A total of 192 and 764 fish challenged to a heat stress experiment for 62 days were genotyped using a customized 1 K and 26 K SNP panels, respectively, and then, genotype imputation was performed from a low‐density chip to WGS using 102 parents (36 males and 66 females) as the reference population. Imputed WGS data were used to perform GWAS and test GP accuracy under different preselected SNP scenarios. Heritability was estimated for body weight (BW), body length (BL) and average daily gain (ADG). Estimates using imputed WGS data ranged from 0.33 ± 0.05 to 0.55 ± 0.05 for growth traits under chronic heat stress. GWAS revealed that the top five cumulatively SNPs explained a maximum of 0.94%, 0.86% and 0.51% of genetic variance for BW, BL and ADG, respectively. Some important functional candidate genes associated with growth‐related traits were found among the most important SNPs, including signal transducer and activator of transcription 5B and 3 (STAT5B and STAT3, respectively) and cytokine‐inducible SH2‐containing protein (CISH). WGS data resulted in a slight increase in prediction accuracy compared with pedigree‐based method, whereas preselected SNPs based on the top GWAS hits improved prediction accuracies, with values ranging from 1.2 to 13.3%. Our results support the evidence of the polygenic nature of growth traits when measured under heat stress. The accuracies of GP can be improved using preselected variants from GWAS, and the use of WGS marginally increases prediction accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grazyella M. Yoshida
- Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias Universidad de Chile Santiago Chile
| | - José M. Yáñez
- Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias Universidad de Chile Santiago Chile
- Núcleo Milenio INVASAL Concepción Chile
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fernandes Júnior GA, Carvalheiro R, de Oliveira HN, Sargolzaei M, Costilla R, Ventura RV, Fonseca LFS, Neves HHR, Hayes BJ, de Albuquerque LG. Imputation accuracy to whole-genome sequence in Nellore cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2021; 53:27. [PMID: 33711929 PMCID: PMC7953568 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-021-00622-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A cost-effective strategy to explore the complete DNA sequence in animals for genetic evaluation purposes is to sequence key ancestors of a population, followed by imputation mechanisms to infer marker genotypes that were not originally reported in a target population of animals genotyped with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels. The feasibility of this process relies on the accuracy of the genotype imputation in that population, particularly for potential causal mutations which may be at low frequency and either within genes or regulatory regions. The objective of the present study was to investigate the imputation accuracy to the sequence level in a Nellore beef cattle population, including that for variants in annotation classes which are more likely to be functional. METHODS Information of 151 key sequenced Nellore sires were used to assess the imputation accuracy from bovine HD BeadChip SNP (~ 777 k) to whole-genome sequence. The choice of the sires aimed at optimizing the imputation accuracy of a genotypic database, comprised of about 10,000 genotyped Nellore animals. Genotype imputation was performed using two computational approaches: FImpute3 and Minimac4 (after using Eagle for phasing). The accuracy of the imputation was evaluated using a fivefold cross-validation scheme and measured by the squared correlation between observed and imputed genotypes, calculated by individual and by SNP. SNPs were classified into a range of annotations, and the accuracy of imputation within each annotation classification was also evaluated. RESULTS High average imputation accuracies per animal were achieved using both FImpute3 (0.94) and Minimac4 (0.95). On average, common variants (minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.03) were more accurately imputed by Minimac4 and low-frequency variants (MAF ≤ 0.03) were more accurately imputed by FImpute3. The inherent Minimac4 Rsq imputation quality statistic appears to be a good indicator of the empirical Minimac4 imputation accuracy. Both software provided high average SNP-wise imputation accuracy for all classes of biological annotations. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that imputation to whole-genome sequence is feasible in Nellore beef cattle since high imputation accuracies per individual are expected. SNP-wise imputation accuracy is software-dependent, especially for rare variants. The accuracy of imputation appears to be relatively independent of annotation classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roberto Carvalheiro
- School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil.,National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, CNPq, Brasília, DF, 71605-001, Brazil
| | - Henrique N de Oliveira
- School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil.,National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, CNPq, Brasília, DF, 71605-001, Brazil
| | - Mehdi Sargolzaei
- Ontario Veterinary College, UG, Guelph, Canada.,Select Sires Inc., Plain City, OH, USA
| | - Roy Costilla
- Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, UQ, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Ricardo V Ventura
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, USP, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil
| | - Larissa F S Fonseca
- School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil
| | | | - Ben J Hayes
- Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, UQ, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Lucia G de Albuquerque
- School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil. .,National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, CNPq, Brasília, DF, 71605-001, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Meuwissen T, van den Berg I, Goddard M. On the use of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction and fine-scale mapping of QTL. Genet Sel Evol 2021; 53:19. [PMID: 33637049 PMCID: PMC7908738 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-021-00607-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whole-genome sequence (WGS) data are increasingly available on large numbers of individuals in animal and plant breeding and in human genetics through second-generation resequencing technologies, 1000 genomes projects, and large-scale genotype imputation from lower marker densities. Here, we present a computationally fast implementation of a variable selection genomic prediction method, that could handle WGS data on more than 35,000 individuals, test its accuracy for across-breed predictions and assess its quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping precision. Methods The Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) variable selection model (Bayes GC) fits simultaneously a genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) term, i.e. a polygenic effect whose correlations are described by a genomic relationship matrix (G), and a Bayes C term, i.e. a set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with large effects selected by the model. Computational speed is improved by a Metropolis–Hastings sampling that directs computations to the SNPs, which are, a priori, most likely to be included into the model. Speed is also improved by running many relatively short MCMC chains. Memory requirements are reduced by storing the genotype matrix in binary form. The model was tested on a WGS dataset containing Holstein, Jersey and Australian Red cattle. The data contained 4,809,520 genotypes on 35,549 individuals together with their milk, fat and protein yields, and fat and protein percentage traits. Results The prediction accuracies of the Jersey individuals improved by 1.5% when using across-breed GBLUP compared to within-breed predictions. Using WGS instead of 600 k SNP-chip data yielded on average a 3% accuracy improvement for Australian Red cows. QTL were fine-mapped by locating the SNP with the highest posterior probability of being included in the model. Various QTL known from the literature were rediscovered, and a new SNP affecting milk production was discovered on chromosome 20 at 34.501126 Mb. Due to the high mapping precision, it was clear that many of the discovered QTL were the same across the five dairy traits. Conclusions Across-breed Bayes GC genomic prediction improved prediction accuracies compared to GBLUP. The combination of across-breed WGS data and Bayesian genomic prediction proved remarkably effective for the fine-mapping of QTL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theo Meuwissen
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.
| | | | - Mike Goddard
- Agriculture Victoria, Bundoora, Australia.,Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ren D, An L, Li B, Qiao L, Liu W. Efficient weighting methods for genomic best linear-unbiased prediction (BLUP) adapted to the genetic architectures of quantitative traits. Heredity (Edinb) 2020; 126:320-334. [PMID: 32980863 DOI: 10.1038/s41437-020-00372-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic best linear-unbiased prediction (GBLUP) assumes equal variance for all marker effects, which is suitable for traits that conform to the infinitesimal model. For traits controlled by major genes, Bayesian methods with shrinkage priors or genome-wide association study (GWAS) methods can be used to identify causal variants effectively. The information from Bayesian/GWAS methods can be used to construct the weighted genomic relationship matrix (G). However, it remains unclear which methods perform best for traits varying in genetic architecture. Therefore, we developed several methods to optimize the performance of weighted GBLUP and compare them with other available methods using simulated and real data sets. First, two types of methods (marker effects with local shrinkage or normal prior) were used to obtain test statistics and estimates for each marker effect. Second, three weighted G matrices were constructed based on the marker information from the first step: (1) the genomic-feature-weighted G, (2) the estimated marker-variance-weighted G, and (3) the absolute value of the estimated marker-effect-weighted G. Following the above process, six different weighted GBLUP methods (local shrinkage/normal-prior GF/EV/AEWGBLUP) were proposed for genomic prediction. Analyses with both simulated and real data demonstrated that these options offer flexibility for optimizing the weighted GBLUP for traits with a broad spectrum of genetic architectures. The advantage of weighting methods over GBLUP in terms of accuracy was trait dependant, ranging from 14.8% to marginal for simulated traits and from 44% to marginal for real traits. Local-shrinkage prior EVWGBLUP is superior for traits mainly controlled by loci of a large effect. Normal-prior AEWGBLUP performs well for traits mainly controlled by loci of moderate effect. For traits controlled by some loci with large effects (explain 25-50% genetic variance) and a range of loci with small effects, GFWGBLUP has advantages. In conclusion, the optimal weighted GBLUP method for genomic selection should take both the genetic architecture and number of QTLs of traits into consideration carefully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duanyang Ren
- College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China
| | - Lixia An
- College of Information, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China
| | - Baojun Li
- College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China
| | - Liying Qiao
- College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China
| | - Wenzhong Liu
- College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Song H, Zhang Q, Ding X. The superiority of multi-trait models with genotype-by-environment interactions in a limited number of environments for genomic prediction in pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2020; 11:88. [PMID: 32974012 PMCID: PMC7507970 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-020-00493-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Different production systems and climates could lead to genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions between populations, and the inclusion of G × E interactions is becoming essential in breeding decisions. The objective of this study was to investigate the performance of multi-trait models in genomic prediction in a limited number of environments with G × E interactions. Results In total, 2,688 and 1,384 individuals with growth and reproduction phenotypes, respectively, from two Yorkshire pig populations with similar genetic backgrounds were genotyped with the PorcineSNP80 panel. Single- and multi-trait models with genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and BayesC π were implemented to investigate their genomic prediction abilities with 20 replicates of five-fold cross-validation. Our results regarding between-environment genetic correlations of growth and reproductive traits (ranging from 0.618 to 0.723) indicated the existence of G × E interactions between these two Yorkshire pig populations. For single-trait models, genomic prediction with GBLUP was only 1.1% more accurate on average in the combined population than in single populations, and no significant improvements were obtained by BayesC π for most traits. In addition, single-trait models with either GBLUP or BayesC π produced greater bias for the combined population than for single populations. However, multi-trait models with GBLUP and BayesC π better accommodated G × E interactions, yielding 2.2% – 3.8% and 1.0% – 2.5% higher prediction accuracies for growth and reproductive traits, respectively, compared to those for single-trait models of single populations and the combined population. The multi-trait models also yielded lower bias and larger gains in the case of a small reference population. The smaller improvement in prediction accuracy and larger bias obtained by the single-trait models in the combined population was mainly due to the low consistency of linkage disequilibrium between the two populations, which also caused the BayesC π method to always produce the largest standard error in marker effect estimation for the combined population. Conclusions In conclusion, our findings confirmed that directly combining populations to enlarge the reference population is not efficient in improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in the presence of G × E interactions, while multi-trait models perform better in a limited number of environments with G × E interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailiang Song
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China
| | - Qin Zhang
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271001 China
| | - Xiangdong Ding
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Genomic prediction based on selected variants from imputed whole-genome sequence data in Australian sheep populations. Genet Sel Evol 2019; 51:72. [PMID: 31805849 PMCID: PMC6896509 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-019-0514-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whole-genome sequence (WGS) data could contain information on genetic variants at or in high linkage disequilibrium with causative mutations that underlie the genetic variation of polygenic traits. Thus far, genomic prediction accuracy has shown limited increase when using such information in dairy cattle studies, in which one or few breeds with limited diversity predominate. The objective of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of genomic prediction in a multi-breed Australian sheep population of relatively less related target individuals, when using information on imputed WGS genotypes. Methods Between 9626 and 26,657 animals with phenotypes were available for nine economically important sheep production traits and all had WGS imputed genotypes. About 30% of the data were used to discover predictive single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) based on a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and the remaining data were used for training and validation of genomic prediction. Prediction accuracy using selected variants from imputed sequence data was compared to that using a standard array of 50k SNP genotypes, thereby comparing genomic best linear prediction (GBLUP) and Bayesian methods (BayesR/BayesRC). Accuracy of genomic prediction was evaluated in two independent populations that were each lowly related to the training set, one being purebred Merino and the other crossbred Border Leicester x Merino sheep. Results A substantial improvement in prediction accuracy was observed when selected sequence variants were fitted alongside 50k genotypes as a separate variance component in GBLUP (2GBLUP) or in Bayesian analysis as a separate category of SNPs (BayesRC). From an average accuracy of 0.27 in both validation sets for the 50k array, the average absolute increase in accuracy across traits with 2GBLUP was 0.083 and 0.073 for purebred and crossbred animals, respectively, whereas with BayesRC it was 0.102 and 0.087. The average gain in accuracy was smaller when selected sequence variants were treated in the same category as 50k SNPs. Very little improvement over 50k prediction was observed when using all WGS variants. Conclusions Accuracy of genomic prediction in diverse sheep populations increased substantially by using variants selected from whole-genome sequence data based on an independent multi-breed GWAS, when compared to genomic prediction using standard 50K genotypes.
Collapse
|
19
|
Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD. 1000 Bull Genomes Project to Map Simple and Complex Genetic Traits in Cattle: Applications and Outcomes. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2019; 7:89-102. [PMID: 30508490 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-115024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 193] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The 1000 Bull Genomes Project is a collection of whole-genome sequences from 2,703 individuals capturing a significant proportion of the world's cattle diversity. So far, 84 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 2.5 million small insertion deletions have been identified in the collection, a very high level of genetic diversity. The project has greatly accelerated the identification of deleterious mutations for a range of genetic diseases, as well as for embryonic lethals. The rate of identification of causal mutations for complex traits has been slower, reflecting the typically small effect size of these mutations and the fact that many are likely in as-yet-unannotated regulatory regions. Both the deleterious mutations that have been identified and the mutations associated with complex trait variation have been included in low-cost SNP array designs, and these arrays are being genotyped in tens of thousands of dairy and beef cattle, enabling management of deleterious mutations in these populations as well as genomic selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben J Hayes
- Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia; .,Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| | - Hans D Daetwyler
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.,School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Song H, Ye S, Jiang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Ding X. Using imputation-based whole-genome sequencing data to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for combined populations in pigs. Genet Sel Evol 2019; 51:58. [PMID: 31638889 PMCID: PMC6805481 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-019-0500-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For genomic selection in populations with a small reference population, combining populations of the same breed or populations of related breeds is an effective way to increase the size of the reference population. However, genomic predictions based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-chip genotype data using combined populations with different genetic backgrounds or from different breeds have not shown a clear advantage over using within-population or within-breed predictions. The increasing availability of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data provides new opportunities for combined population genomic prediction. Our objective was to investigate the accuracy of genomic prediction using imputation-based WGS data from combined populations in pigs. Using 80K SNP panel genotypes, WGS genotypes, or genotypes on WGS variants that were pruned based on linkage disequilibrium (LD), three methods [genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), single-step (ss)GBLUP, and genomic feature (GF)BLUP] were implemented with different prior information to identify the best method to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for combined populations in pigs. RESULTS In total, 2089 and 2043 individuals with production and reproduction phenotypes, respectively, from three Yorkshire populations with different genetic backgrounds were genotyped with the PorcineSNP80 panel. Imputation accuracy from 80K to WGS variants reached 92%. The results showed that use of the WGS data compared to the 80K SNP panel did not increase the accuracy of genomic prediction in a single population, but using WGS data with LD pruning and GFBLUP with prior information did yield higher accuracy than the 80K SNP panel. For the 80K SNP panel genotypes, using the combined population resulted in a slight improvement, no change, or even a slight decrease in accuracy in comparison with the single population for GBLUP and ssGBLUP, while accuracy increased by 1 to 2.4% when using WGS data. Notably, the GFBLUP method did not perform well for both the combined population and the single populations. CONCLUSIONS The use of WGS data was beneficial for combined population genomic prediction. Simply increasing the number of SNPs to the WGS level did not increase accuracy for a single population, while using pruned WGS data based on LD and GFBLUP with prior information could yield higher accuracy than the 80K SNP panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailiang Song
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, National Engineering Laboratory of Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Shaopan Ye
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Centre for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Yifan Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, National Engineering Laboratory of Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhe Zhang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Centre for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Qin Zhang
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China
| | - Xiangdong Ding
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, National Engineering Laboratory of Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Improvement of genomic prediction by integrating additional single nucleotide polymorphisms selected from imputed whole genome sequencing data. Heredity (Edinb) 2019; 124:37-49. [PMID: 31278370 PMCID: PMC6906477 DOI: 10.1038/s41437-019-0246-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 05/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The availability of whole genome sequencing (WGS) data enables the discovery of causative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or SNPs in high linkage disequilibrium with causative SNPs. This study investigated effects of integrating SNPs selected from imputed WGS data into the data of 54K chip on genomic prediction in Danish Jersey. The WGS SNPs, mainly including peaks of quantitative trait loci, structure variants, regulatory regions of genes, and SNPs within genes with strong effects predicted with variant effect predictor, were selected in previous analyses for dairy breeds in Denmark–Finland–Sweden (DFS) and France (FRA). Animals genotyped with 54K chip, standard LD chip, and customized LD chip which covered selected WGS SNPs and SNPs in the standard LD chip, were imputed to 54K together with DFS and FRA SNPs. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and Bayesian four-distribution mixture models considering 54K and selected WGS SNPs as one (a one-component model) or two separate genetic components (a two-component model) were used to predict breeding values. For milk production traits and mastitis, both DFS (0.025) and FRA (0.029) sets of additional WGS SNPs improved reliabilities, and inclusions of all selected WGS SNPs generally achieved highest improvements of reliabilities (0.034). A Bayesian four-distribution model yielded higher reliabilities than a GBLUP model for milk and protein, but extra gains in reliabilities from using selected WGS SNPs were smaller for a Bayesian four-distribution model than a GBLUP model. Generally, no significant difference was observed between one-component and two-component models, except for using GBLUP models for milk.
Collapse
|
22
|
Gebreyesus G, Bovenhuis H, Lund MS, Poulsen NA, Sun D, Buitenhuis B. Reliability of genomic prediction for milk fatty acid composition by using a multi-population reference and incorporating GWAS results. Genet Sel Evol 2019; 51:16. [PMID: 31029078 PMCID: PMC6487064 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-019-0460-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Large-scale phenotyping for detailed milk fatty acid (FA) composition is difficult due to expensive and time-consuming analytical techniques. Reliability of genomic prediction is often low for traits that are expensive/difficult to measure and for breeds with a small reference population size. An effective method to increase reference population size could be to combine datasets from different populations. Prediction models might also benefit from incorporation of information on the biological underpinnings of quantitative traits. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) show that genomic regions on Bos taurus chromosomes (BTA) 14, 19 and 26 underlie substantial proportions of the genetic variation in milk FA traits. Genomic prediction models that incorporate such results could enable improved prediction accuracy in spite of limited reference population sizes. In this study, we combine gas chromatography quantified FA samples from the Chinese, Danish and Dutch Holstein populations and implement a genomic feature best linear unbiased prediction (GFBLUP) model that incorporates variants on BTA14, 19 and 26 as genomic features for which random genetic effects are estimated separately. Prediction reliabilities were compared to those estimated with traditional GBLUP models. Results Predictions using a multi-population reference and a traditional GBLUP model resulted in average gains in prediction reliability of 10% points in the Dutch, 8% points in the Danish and 1% point in the Chinese populations compared to predictions based on population-specific references. Compared to the traditional GBLUP, implementation of the GFBLUP model with a multi-population reference led to further increases in prediction reliability of up to 38% points in the Dutch, 23% points in the Danish and 13% points in the Chinese populations. Prediction reliabilities from the GFBLUP model were moderate to high across the FA traits analyzed. Conclusions Our study shows that it is possible to predict genetic merits for milk FA traits with reasonable accuracy by combining related populations of a breed and using models that incorporate GWAS results. Our findings indicate that international collaborations that facilitate access to multi-population datasets could be highly beneficial to the implementation of genomic selection for detailed milk composition traits. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12711-019-0460-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grum Gebreyesus
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, P.O. Box 50, 8830, Tjele, Denmark. .,Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Henk Bovenhuis
- Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mogens S Lund
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, P.O. Box 50, 8830, Tjele, Denmark
| | - Nina A Poulsen
- Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, P.O. Box 50, 8830, Tjele, Denmark
| | - Dongxiao Sun
- Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture of China, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Bart Buitenhuis
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, P.O. Box 50, 8830, Tjele, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
van den Berg I, Hayes BJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME. Overlap between eQTL and QTL associated with production traits and fertility in dairy cattle. BMC Genomics 2019; 20:291. [PMID: 30987590 PMCID: PMC6466667 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5656-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Identifying causative mutations or genes through which quantitative trait loci (QTL) act has proven very difficult. Using information such as gene expression may help to identify genes and mutations underlying QTL. Our objective was to identify regions associated both with production traits or fertility and with gene expression, in dairy cattle. We used three different approaches to discover QTL that are also expression QTL (eQTL): 1) estimate the correlation between local genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) and gene expression, 2) investigate whether the 300 intervals explaining most genetic variance for a trait contain more eQTL than 300 randomly selected intervals, and 3) a colocalisation analysis. Phenotypes and genotypes up to sequence level of 35,775 dairy bulls and cows were used for QTL mapping, and gene expression and genotypes of 131 cows were used to identify eQTL. Results With all three approaches, we identified some overlap between eQTL and QTL, though the majority of QTL in our dataset did not seem to be eQTL. The most significant associations between QTL and eQTL were found for intervals on chromosome 18, where local GEBV for all traits showed a strong association with the expression of the FUK and DDX19B. Intervals whose local GEBV for a trait correlated highly significantly with the expression of a nearby gene explained only a very small part of the genetic variance for that trait. It is likely that part of these correlations were due to linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the interval. While the 300 intervals explaining most genetic variance explained most of the GEBV variance, they contained only slightly more eQTL than 300 randomly selected intervals that explained a minimal portion of the GEBV variance. Furthermore, some variants showed a high colocalisation probability, but this was only the case for few variants. Conclusions Several reasons may have contributed to the low level of overlap between QTL and eQTL detected in our study, including a lack of power in the eQTL study and long-range LD making it difficult to separate QTL and eQTL. Furthermore, it may be that eQTL explain only a small fraction of QTL. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-5656-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I van den Berg
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. .,Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
| | - B J Hayes
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.,Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Animal Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4067, Australia
| | - A J Chamberlain
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - M E Goddard
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
|