1
|
Boideau F, Huteau V, Maillet L, Brunet A, Coriton O, Deniot G, Trotoux G, Taburel-Lodé M, Eber F, Gilet M, Baron C, Boutte J, Richard G, Aury JM, Belser C, Labadie K, Morice J, Falentin C, Martin O, Falque M, Chèvre AM, Rousseau-Gueutin M. Alternating between even and odd ploidy levels switches on and off the recombination control, even near the centromeres. THE PLANT CELL 2024; 36:4472-4490. [PMID: 39121028 PMCID: PMC11449113 DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koae208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/11/2024]
Abstract
Meiotic recombination is a key biological process in plant evolution and breeding, as it generates genetic diversity in each generation through the formation of crossovers (COs). However, due to their importance in genome stability, COs are highly regulated in frequency and distribution. We previously demonstrated that this strict regulation of COs can be modified, both in terms of CO frequency and distribution, in allotriploid Brassica hybrids (2n = 3x = 29; AAC) resulting from a cross between Brassica napus (2n = 4x = 38; AACC) and Brassica rapa (2n = 2x = 20; AA). Using the recently updated B. napus genome now including pericentromeres, we demonstrated that COs occur in these cold regions in allotriploids, as close as 375 kb from the centromere. Reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) of various meiotic genes indicated that Class I COs are likely involved in the increased recombination frequency observed in allotriploids. We also demonstrated that this modified recombination landscape can be maintained via successive generations of allotriploidy (odd ploidy level). This deregulated meiotic behavior reverts to strict regulation in allotetraploid (even ploidy level) progeny in the second generation. Overall, we provide an easy way to manipulate tight recombination control in a polyploid crop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz Boideau
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Virginie Huteau
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Loeiz Maillet
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Anael Brunet
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Olivier Coriton
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Gwenaëlle Deniot
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Gwenn Trotoux
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | | | - Frédérique Eber
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Marie Gilet
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Cécile Baron
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Julien Boutte
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Gautier Richard
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Jean-Marc Aury
- Génomique Métabolique, Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, CNRS, Univ Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, 91057 Evry, France
| | - Caroline Belser
- Génomique Métabolique, Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, CNRS, Univ Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, 91057 Evry, France
| | - Karine Labadie
- Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91057 Evry, France
| | - Jérôme Morice
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Cyril Falentin
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | - Olivier Martin
- Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay, Université de Paris-Saclay, Paris-Cité and Evry, CNRS, INRAE, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, GQE—Le Moulon, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Matthieu Falque
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, GQE—Le Moulon, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Anne-Marie Chèvre
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jahed KR, Hirst PM. Fruit growth and development in apple: a molecular, genomics and epigenetics perspective. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2023; 14:1122397. [PMID: 37123845 PMCID: PMC10130390 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1122397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Fruit growth and development are physiological processes controlled by several internal and external factors. This complex regulatory mechanism comprises a series of events occurring in a chronological order over a growing season. Understanding the underlying mechanism of fruit development events, however, requires consideration of the events occurring prior to fruit development such as flowering, pollination, fertilization, and fruit set. Such events are interrelated and occur in a sequential order. Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing technology in conjunction with improved statistical and computational methods have empowered science to identify some of the major molecular components and mechanisms involved in the regulation of fruit growth and have supplied encouraging successes in associating genotypic differentiation with phenotypic observations. As a result, multiple approaches have been developed to dissect such complex regulatory machinery and understand the genetic basis controlling these processes. These methods include transcriptomic analysis, quantitative trait loci (QTLs) mapping, whole-genome approach, and epigenetics analyses. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the molecular, genomic and epigenetics perspective of apple fruit growth and development that defines the final fruit size and provides a detailed analysis of the mechanisms by which fruit growth and development are controlled. Though the main emphasis of this article is on the molecular, genomic and epigenetics aspects of fruit growth and development, we will also deliver a brief overview on events occurring prior to fruit growth.
Collapse
|
3
|
Improvement of recombinant miraculin production in transgenic tomato by crossbreeding-based genetic background modification. Transgenic Res 2022; 31:567-578. [PMID: 35974134 DOI: 10.1007/s11248-022-00320-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
An important optimization step in plant-based recombinant protein production systems is the selection of an appropriate cultivar after a potential host has been determined. Previously, we have shown that transgenic tomatoes of the variety 'Micro-Tom' accumulate incredibly high levels of miraculin (MIR) due to the introduction of MIR gene controlled by a CaMV35S promoter and a heat-shock protein terminator. However, 'Micro-Tom' is unsuitable for commercial production of MIR as it is a dwarf cultivar characterized by small-sized fruit and poor yield. Here, we used the crossbreeding approach to transfer the high MIR accumulation trait of transgenic 'Micro-Tom' tomatoes to 'Natsunokoma' and 'Aichi First', two commercial cultivars producing medium and large fruit sizes, respectively. Fruits of the resultant crossbred lines were larger (~ 95 times), but their miraculin accumulation levels (~ 1,062 μg/g fresh mass) were comparable to the donor cultivar, indicating that the high miraculin accumulation trait was preserved regardless of fruit size or cultivar. Further, the transferred trait resulted in a 3-4 fold increase in overall miraculin production than that of the previously reported line 5B. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of crossbreeding in improving MIR production in tomatoes and could pave the way for a more efficient production of recombinant proteins in other plants.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ter Steeg EMS, Struik PC, Visser RGF, Lindhout P. Crucial factors for the feasibility of commercial hybrid breeding in food crops. NATURE PLANTS 2022; 8:463-473. [PMID: 35513713 DOI: 10.1038/s41477-022-01142-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
There is an ongoing societal debate about plant breeding systems and their impact on stakeholders in food systems. Hybrid breeding and hybrid seed have become controversial topics as they are believed to mostly serve high-tech agricultural systems. This article focuses on the perspective of commercial plant breeders when developing new cultivars of food crops. Arguably, hybrid breeding is the most effective breeding system for genetic improvement of crops, enhancing yields, improving product quality and increasing resistance against (a)biotic stresses. Nonetheless, hybrid breeding is not commercially applied in all crops. We analyse how biological and economic factors determine whether a commercial plant breeder opts for the hybrid system or not. We show that the commercial feasibility of hybrid breeding depends on the crop and business case. In conclusion, the commercial application of hybrid breeding in crops seems to be hampered mostly by high costs of seed production. Case studies regarding the hybrid transitions in maize, wheat and potato are included to illustrate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily M S Ter Steeg
- Development Economics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Paul C Struik
- Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Richard G F Visser
- Plant Breeding, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Foria S, Magris G, Jurman I, Schwope R, De Candido M, De Luca E, Ivanišević D, Morgante M, Di Gaspero G. Extent of wild-to-crop interspecific introgression in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) as a consequence of resistance breeding and implications for the crop species definition. HORTICULTURE RESEARCH 2022; 9:uhab010. [PMID: 35039824 PMCID: PMC8801725 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhab010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Over the past two centuries, introgression through repeated backcrossing has introduced disease resistance from wild grape species into the domesticated lineage Vitis vinifera subsp. sativa. Introgression lines are being cultivated over increasing vineyard surface areas, as their wines now rival in quality those obtained from preexisting varieties. There is, however, a lot of debate about whether and how wine laws defining commercial product categories, which are based on the classification of V. vinifera and interspecific hybrid grapes, should be revised to accommodate novel varieties that do not fit either category. Here, we developed a method of multilocus genotype analysis using short-read resequencing to identify haplotypic blocks of wild ancestry in introgression lines and quantify the physical length of chromosome segments free-of-introgression or with monoallelic and biallelic introgression. We used this genomic data to characterize species, hybrids and introgression lines and show that newly released resistant varieties contain 76.5-94.8% of V. vinifera DNA. We found that varietal wine ratings are not always commensurate with the percentage of V. vinifera ancestry and linkage drag of wild alleles around known resistance genes persists over at least 7.1-11.5 Mb, slowing down the recovery of the recurrent parental genome. This method also allowed us to identify the donor species of known resistance haplotypes, define the ancestry of wild genetic background in introgression lines with complex pedigrees, validate the ancestry of the historic varieties Concord and Norton, and unravel sample curation errors in public databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Foria
- Istituto di Genomica Applicata,
via Jacopo Linussio, 51, 33100 Udine, Italy
- Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy
- Dr. Schär R&D Centre, Padriciano 99, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Gabriele Magris
- Istituto di Genomica Applicata,
via Jacopo Linussio, 51, 33100 Udine, Italy
- Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Irena Jurman
- Istituto di Genomica Applicata,
via Jacopo Linussio, 51, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Rachel Schwope
- Istituto di Genomica Applicata,
via Jacopo Linussio, 51, 33100 Udine, Italy
- Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Massimo De Candido
- VCR Research Center, Vivai Cooperativi Rauscedo, Via Ruggero Forti 4, 33095 San Giorgio della Richinvelda, Italy
| | - Elisa De Luca
- VCR Research Center, Vivai Cooperativi Rauscedo, Via Ruggero Forti 4, 33095 San Giorgio della Richinvelda, Italy
| | - Dragoslav Ivanišević
- Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21102 Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Michele Morgante
- Istituto di Genomica Applicata,
via Jacopo Linussio, 51, 33100 Udine, Italy
- Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bohra A, Kilian B, Sivasankar S, Caccamo M, Mba C, McCouch SR, Varshney RK. Reap the crop wild relatives for breeding future crops. Trends Biotechnol 2021; 40:412-431. [PMID: 34629170 DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Crop wild relatives (CWRs) have provided breeders with several 'game-changing' traits or genes that have boosted crop resilience and global agricultural production. Advances in breeding and genomics have accelerated the identification of valuable CWRs for use in crop improvement. The enhanced genetic diversity of breeding pools carrying optimum combinations of favorable alleles for targeted crop-growing regions is crucial to sustain genetic gain. In parallel, growing sequence information on wild genomes in combination with precise gene-editing tools provide a fast-track route to transform CWRs into ideal future crops. Data-informed germplasm collection and management strategies together with adequate policy support will be equally important to improve access to CWRs and their sustainable use to meet food and nutrition security targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Bohra
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research (IIPR), 208024 Kanpur, India
| | | | - Shoba Sivasankar
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna International Centre, 1400 Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Chikelu Mba
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome 00153, Italy
| | - Susan R McCouch
- Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
| | - Rajeev K Varshney
- Centre of Excellence in Genomics and Systems Biology, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502324, India; State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boideau F, Pelé A, Tanguy C, Trotoux G, Eber F, Maillet L, Gilet M, Lodé-Taburel M, Huteau V, Morice J, Coriton O, Falentin C, Delourme R, Rousseau-Gueutin M, Chèvre AM. A Modified Meiotic Recombination in Brassica napus Largely Improves Its Breeding Efficiency. BIOLOGY 2021; 10:biology10080771. [PMID: 34440003 PMCID: PMC8389541 DOI: 10.3390/biology10080771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Simple Summary The selection of varieties more resilient to disease and climate change requires generating new genetic diversity for breeding. The main mechanism for reshuffling genetic information is through the recombination of chromosomes during meiosis. We showed in oilseed rape (Brassica napus, AACC, 2n = 4x = 38), which is a natural hybrid formed from a cross between turnip (B. rapa, AA, 2n = 2x = 20) and cabbage (B. oleracea, CC, 2n = 2x = 18), that there is significantly more crossovers occurring along the entire A chromosomes in allotriploid AAC (crossbetween B. napus and B. rapa) than in diploid AA or allotetraploid AACC hybrids. We demonstrated that these allotriploid AAC hybrids are highly efficient to introduce new variability within oilseed rape varieties, notably by enabling the introduction of small genomic regions carrying genes controlling agronomically interesting traits. Abstract Meiotic recombination is the main tool used by breeders to generate biodiversity, allowing genetic reshuffling at each generation. It enables the accumulation of favorable alleles while purging deleterious mutations. However, this mechanism is highly regulated with the formation of one to rarely more than three crossovers, which are not randomly distributed. In this study, we showed that it is possible to modify these controls in oilseed rape (Brassica napus, AACC, 2n = 4x = 38) and that it is linked to AAC allotriploidy and not to polyploidy per se. To that purpose, we compared the frequency and the distribution of crossovers along A chromosomes from hybrids carrying exactly the same A nucleotide sequence, but presenting three different ploidy levels: AA, AAC and AACC. Genetic maps established with 202 SNPs anchored on reference genomes revealed that the crossover rate is 3.6-fold higher in the AAC allotriploid hybrids compared to AA and AACC hybrids. Using a higher SNP density, we demonstrated that smaller and numerous introgressions of B. rapa were present in AAC hybrids compared to AACC allotetraploid hybrids, with 7.6 Mb vs. 16.9 Mb on average and 21 B. rapa regions per plant vs. nine regions, respectively. Therefore, this boost of recombination is highly efficient to reduce the size of QTL carried in cold regions of the oilseed rape genome, as exemplified here for a QTL conferring blackleg resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz Boideau
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Alexandre Pelé
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
- Laboratory of Genome Biology, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
| | - Coleen Tanguy
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Gwenn Trotoux
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Frédérique Eber
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Loeiz Maillet
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Marie Gilet
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Maryse Lodé-Taburel
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Virginie Huteau
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Jérôme Morice
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Olivier Coriton
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Cyril Falentin
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Régine Delourme
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Mathieu Rousseau-Gueutin
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
| | - Anne-Marie Chèvre
- IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35650 Le Rheu, France; (F.B.); (A.P.); (C.T.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (L.M.); (M.G.); (M.L.-T.); (V.H.); (J.M.); (O.C.); (C.F.); (R.D.); (M.R.-G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-2-23-48-51-31
| |
Collapse
|