1
|
Fang L, Teng J, Lin Q, Bai Z, Liu S, Guan D, Li B, Gao Y, Hou Y, Gong M, Pan Z, Yu Y, Clark EL, Smith J, Rawlik K, Xiang R, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME, Littlejohn M, Larson G, MacHugh DE, O'Grady JF, Sørensen P, Sahana G, Lund MS, Jiang Z, Pan X, Gong W, Zhang H, He X, Zhang Y, Gao N, He J, Yi G, Liu Y, Tang Z, Zhao P, Zhou Y, Fu L, Wang X, Hao D, Liu L, Chen S, Young RS, Shen X, Xia C, Cheng H, Ma L, Cole JB, Baldwin RL, Li CJ, Van Tassell CP, Rosen BD, Bhowmik N, Lunney J, Liu W, Guan L, Zhao X, Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Luo Y, Lin L, Canela-Xandri O, Derks MFL, Crooijmans RPMA, Gòdia M, Madsen O, Groenen MAM, Koltes JE, Tuggle CK, McCarthy FM, Rocha D, Giuffra E, Amills M, Clop A, Ballester M, Tosser-Klopp G, Li J, Fang C, Fang M, Wang Q, Hou Z, Wang Q, Zhao F, Jiang L, Zhao G, Zhou Z, Zhou R, Liu H, Deng J, Jin L, Li M, Mo D, Liu X, Chen Y, Yuan X, Li J, Zhao S, Zhang Y, Ding X, Sun D, Sun HZ, Li C, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Wu D, Wang W, Fan X, Zhang Q, Li K, Zhang H, Yang N, Hu X, Huang W, Song J, Wu Y, Yang J, Wu W, Kasper C, Liu X, Yu X, Cui L, Zhou X, Kim S, Li W, Im HK, Buckler ES, Ren B, Schatz MC, Li JJ, Palmer AA, Frantz L, Zhou H, Zhang Z, Liu GE. The Farm Animal Genotype-Tissue Expression (FarmGTEx) Project. Nat Genet 2025; 57:786-796. [PMID: 40097783 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-025-02121-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025]
Abstract
Genetic mutation and drift, coupled with natural and human-mediated selection and migration, have produced a wide variety of genotypes and phenotypes in farmed animals. We here introduce the Farm Animal Genotype-Tissue Expression (FarmGTEx) Project, which aims to elucidate the genetic determinants of gene expression across 16 terrestrial and aquatic domestic species under diverse biological and environmental contexts. For each species, we aim to collect multiomics data, particularly genomics and transcriptomics, from 50 tissues of 1,000 healthy adults and 200 additional animals representing a specific context. This Perspective provides an overview of the priorities of FarmGTEx and advocates for coordinated strategies of data analysis and resource-sharing initiatives. FarmGTEx aims to serve as a platform for investigating context-specific regulatory effects, which will deepen our understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying complex phenotypes. The knowledge and insights provided by FarmGTEx will contribute to improving sustainable agriculture-based food systems, comparative biology and eventual human biomedicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingzhao Fang
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Jinyan Teng
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing Lin
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhonghao Bai
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Shuli Liu
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China
- School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dailu Guan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Bingjie Li
- Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland's Rural College, Midlothian, UK
| | - Yahui Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yali Hou
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Mian Gong
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhangyuan Pan
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Yu
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Emily L Clark
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, UK
| | - Jacqueline Smith
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, UK
| | - Konrad Rawlik
- Baillie Gifford Pandemic Science Hub, Centre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ruidong Xiang
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- Cambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amanda J Chamberlain
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael E Goddard
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mathew Littlejohn
- Research and Development, Livestock Improvement Corporation, Hamilton, New Zealand
- AL Rae Centre for Genetics and Breeding, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - Greger Larson
- The Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David E MacHugh
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD One Health Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John F O'Grady
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter Sørensen
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Goutam Sahana
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mogens Sandø Lund
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Zhihua Jiang
- Department of Animal Sciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - Xiangchun Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wentao Gong
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haihan Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Xi He
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Yuebo Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Ning Gao
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Jun He
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Guoqiang Yi
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yuwen Liu
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhonglin Tang
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Pengju Zhao
- Hainan Institute, Zhejiang University, Yongyou Industry Park, Yazhou Bay Sci-Tech City, Sanya, China
| | - Yang Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
- Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China
| | - Liangliang Fu
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Dan Hao
- Poultry Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China
| | - Siqian Chen
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Robert S Young
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Zhejiang University-University of Edinburgh Institute, Zhejiang University, Haining, P. R. China
| | - Xia Shen
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Center for Evolutionary Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Center for Intelligent Medicine Research, Greater Bay Area Institute of Precision Medicine (Guangzhou), Fudan University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Charley Xia
- Lothian Birth Cohort studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Hao Cheng
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Li Ma
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - John B Cole
- Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding, Bowie, MD, USA
- Department of Animal Sciences, Donald Henry Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program and the Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Ransom L Baldwin
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Cong-Jun Li
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Curtis P Van Tassell
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Benjamin D Rosen
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Nayan Bhowmik
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Joan Lunney
- Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, BARC, NEA, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Wansheng Liu
- Department of Animal Science, Center for Reproductive Biology and Health, College of Agricultural Sciences, the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Leluo Guan
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Xin Zhao
- Department of Animal Science, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada
| | - Eveline M Ibeagha-Awemu
- Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yonglun Luo
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lin Lin
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Oriol Canela-Xandri
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Martijn F L Derks
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marta Gòdia
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ole Madsen
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Martien A M Groenen
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - James E Koltes
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | | | | | - Dominique Rocha
- GABI, AgroParisTech, INRAE, Paris-Saclay University, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Elisabetta Giuffra
- GABI, AgroParisTech, INRAE, Paris-Saclay University, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Marcel Amills
- Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics, CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Alex Clop
- Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics, CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Ballester
- Animal Breeding and Genetics Programme, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon, Caldes de Montbui, Spain
| | | | - Jing Li
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kunming University, Kunming, China
| | - Chao Fang
- LC-Bio Technologies, Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming Fang
- Key Laboratory of Healthy Mariculture for the East China Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Jimei University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qishan Wang
- College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhuocheng Hou
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Qin Wang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Fuping Zhao
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Jiang
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Guiping Zhao
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhengkui Zhou
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Rong Zhou
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hehe Liu
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Juan Deng
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Long Jin
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mingzhou Li
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
| | - Delin Mo
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaohong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaosheng Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaolong Yuan
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiaqi Li
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuhong Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
- Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangdong Ding
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Dongxiao Sun
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Hui-Zeng Sun
- Key Laboratory of Dairy Cow Genetic Improvement and Milk Quality Research of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Cong Li
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Yu Wang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Yu Jiang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Dongdong Wu
- Key Laboratory of Genetic Evolution and Animal Models, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Wenwen Wang
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China
| | - Xinzhong Fan
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China
| | - Qin Zhang
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China
| | - Kui Li
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Yang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoxiang Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Wen Huang
- Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Jiuzhou Song
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Yang Wu
- Institute of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jian Yang
- Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China
- School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiwei Wu
- Institute of Animal Science, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Ürümqi City, China
| | - Claudia Kasper
- Animal GenoPhenomics, Animal Production Systems and Animal Health, Agroscope Posieux, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Xinfeng Liu
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystem, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaofei Yu
- College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China
| | - Leilei Cui
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Aging and Disease, Human Aging Research Institute and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xiang Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Seyoung Kim
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Wei Li
- Division of Computational Biomedicine, Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Hae Kyung Im
- Department of Medicine and Human Genetics, the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Edward S Buckler
- Section of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Bing Ren
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Center for Epigenomics, Moores Cancer Center and Institute of Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Michael C Schatz
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jingyi Jessica Li
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Abraham A Palmer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| | - Laurent Frantz
- Palaeogenomics Group, Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
- School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - Huaijun Zhou
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
| | - Zhe Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - George E Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Silver LW, McLennan EA, Beaman J, da Silva KB, Timms P, Hogg CJ, Belov K. Using bioinformatics to investigate functional diversity: a case study of MHC diversity in koalas. Immunogenetics 2024; 76:381-395. [PMID: 39367971 PMCID: PMC11496358 DOI: 10.1007/s00251-024-01356-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/15/2024] [Indexed: 10/07/2024]
Abstract
Conservation genomics can greatly improve conservation outcomes of threatened populations, including those impacted by disease. Understanding diversity within immune gene families, including the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and toll-like receptors (TLR), is important due to the role they play in disease resilience and susceptibility. With recent advancements in sequencing technologies and bioinformatic tools, the cost of generating high-quality sequence data has significantly decreased and made it possible to investigate diversity across entire gene families in large numbers of individuals compared to investigating only a few genes or a few populations previously. Here, we use the koala as a case study for investigating functional diversity across populations. We utilised previous target enrichment data and 438 whole genomes to firstly, determine the level of sequencing depth required to investigate MHC diversity and, secondly, determine the current level of diversity in MHC genes in koala populations. We determined for low complexity, conserved genes such as TLR genes 10 × sequencing depth is sufficient to reliably genotype more than 90% of variants, whereas for complex genes such as the MHC greater than 20 × and preferably 30 × sequencing depth is required. We used whole genome data to identify 270 biallelic SNPs across 24 MHC genes as well as copy number variation (CNV) within class I and class II genes and conduct supertype analysis. Overall, we have provided a bioinformatic workflow for investigating variation in a complex immune gene family from whole genome sequencing data and determined current levels of diversity within koala MHC genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke W Silver
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Elspeth A McLennan
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Julian Beaman
- College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5001, Australia
| | - Karen Burke da Silva
- College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5001, Australia
| | - Peter Timms
- Genecology Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia
| | - Carolyn J Hogg
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Katherine Belov
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Y, Khan MZ, Wang X, Liang H, Ren W, Kou X, Liu X, Chen W, Peng Y, Wang C. Structural variations in livestock genomes and their associations with phenotypic traits: a review. Front Vet Sci 2024; 11:1416220. [PMID: 39600883 PMCID: PMC11588642 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1416220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Genomic structural variation (SV) refers to differences in gene sequences between individuals on a genomic scale. It is widely distributed in the genome, primarily in the form of insertions, deletions, duplications, inversions, and translocations. Due to its characterization by long segments and large coverage, SVs significantly impact the genetic characteristics and production performance of livestock, playing a crucial role in studying breed diversity, biological evolution, and disease correlation. Research on SVs contributes to an enhanced understanding of chromosome function and genetic characteristics and is important for understanding hereditary diseases mechanisms. In this article, we review the concept, classification, main formation mechanisms, detection methods, and advancement of research on SVs in the genomes of cattle, buffalo, equine, sheep, and goats, aiming to reveal the genetic basis of differences in phenotypic traits and adaptive genetic mechanisms through genomic research, which will provide a theoretical basis for better understanding and utilizing the genetic resources of herbivorous livestock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Muhammad Zahoor Khan
- College of Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yongdong Peng
- College of Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, China
| | - Changfa Wang
- College of Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grant JR, Herman EK, Barlow LD, Miglior F, Schenkel FS, Baes CF, Stothard P. A large structural variant collection in Holstein cattle and associated database for variant discovery, characterization, and application. BMC Genomics 2024; 25:903. [PMID: 39350025 PMCID: PMC11440700 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Structural variants (SVs) such as deletions, duplications, and insertions are known to contribute to phenotypic variation but remain challenging to identify and genotype. A more complete, accessible, and assessable collection of SVs will assist efforts to study SV function in cattle and to incorporate SV genotyping into animal evaluation. RESULTS In this work we produced a large and deeply characterized collection of SVs in Holstein cattle using two popular SV callers (Manta and Smoove) and publicly available Illumina whole-genome sequence (WGS) read sets from 310 samples (290 male, 20 female, mean 20X coverage). Manta and Smoove identified 31 K and 68 K SVs, respectively. In total the SVs cover 5% (Manta) and 6% (Smoove) of the reference genome, in contrast to the 1% impacted by SNPs and indels. SV genotypes from each caller were confirmed to accurately recapitulate animal relationships estimated using WGS SNP genotypes from the same dataset, with Manta genotypes outperforming Smoove, and deletions outperforming duplications. To support efforts to link the SVs to phenotypic variation, overlapping and tag SNPs were identified for each SV, using genotype sets extracted from the WGS results corresponding to two bovine SNP chips (BovineSNP50 and BovineHD). 9% (Manta) and 11% (Smoove) of the SVs were found to have overlapping BovineHD panel SNPs, while 21% (Manta) and 9% (Smoove) have BovineHD panel tag SNPs. A custom interactive database ( https://svdb-dc.pslab.ca ) containing the identified sequence variants with extensive annotations, gene feature information, and BAM file content for all SVs was created to enable the evaluation and prioritization of SVs for further study. Illustrative examples involving the genes POPDC3, ORM1, G2E3, FANCI, TFB1M, FOXC2, N4BP2, GSTA3, and COPA show how this resource can be used to find well-supported genic SVs, determine SV breakpoints, design genotyping approaches, and identify processed pseudogenes masquerading as deletions. CONCLUSIONS The resources developed through this study can be used to explore sequence variation in Holstein cattle and to develop strategies for studying SVs of interest. The lack of overlapping and tag SNPs from commonly used SNP chips for most of the SVs suggests that other genotyping approaches will be needed (for example direct genotyping) to understand their potential contributions to phenotype. The included SV genotype assessments point to challenges in characterizing SVs, especially duplications, using short-read data and support ongoing efforts to better characterize cattle genomes through long-read sequencing. Lastly, the identification of previously known functional SVs and additional CDS-overlapping SVs supports the phenotypic relevance of this dataset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason R Grant
- Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Emily K Herman
- Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Lael D Barlow
- Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Filippo Miglior
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
- , Lactanet, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Flavio S Schenkel
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Christine F Baes
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
- Institute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul Stothard
- Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N. An overview of recent technological developments in bovine genomics. Vet Anim Sci 2024; 25:100382. [PMID: 39166173 PMCID: PMC11334705 DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2024.100382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Cattle are regarded as highly valuable animals because of their milk, beef, dung, fur, and ability to draft. The scientific community has tried a number of strategies to improve the genetic makeup of bovine germplasm. To ensure higher returns for the dairy and beef industries, researchers face their greatest challenge in improving commercially important traits. One of the biggest developments in the last few decades in the creation of instruments for cattle genetic improvement is the discovery of the genome. Breeding livestock is being revolutionized by genomic selection made possible by the availability of medium- and high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays coupled with sophisticated statistical techniques. It is becoming easier to access high-dimensional genomic data in cattle. Continuously declining genotyping costs and an increase in services that use genomic data to increase return on investment have both made a significant contribution to this. The field of genomics has come a long way thanks to groundbreaking discoveries such as radiation-hybrid mapping, in situ hybridization, synteny analysis, somatic cell genetics, cytogenetic maps, molecular markers, association studies for quantitative trait loci, high-throughput SNP genotyping, whole-genome shotgun sequencing to whole-genome mapping, and genome editing. These advancements have had a significant positive impact on the field of cattle genomics. This manuscript aimed to review recent advances in genomic technologies for cattle breeding and future prospects in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, 41635-1314, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ben-Jemaa S, Boussaha M, Mandonnet N, Bardou P, Naves M. Uncovering structural variants in Creole cattle from Guadeloupe and their impact on environmental adaptation through whole genome sequencing. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0309411. [PMID: 39186744 PMCID: PMC11346954 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Structural variants play an important role in evolutionary processes. Besides, they constitute a large source of inter individual genetic variation that might represent a major factor in the aetiology of complex, multifactorial traits. Their importance in adaptation is becoming increasingly evident in literature. Yet, the characterization of the genomic landscape of structural variants in local breeds remains scarce to date. Herein, we investigate patterns and gene annotation of structural variants in the Creole cattle from Guadeloupe breed using whole genome sequences from 23 bulls representative of the population. In total, we detected 32821 ascertained SV defining 15258 regions, representing ~ 17% of the Creole cattle genome. Among these, 6639 regions have not been previously reported in the Database of Genomic Variants archive. Average number of structural variants detected per individual in the studied population is in the same order of magnitude of that observed in indicine populations and higher than that reported in taurine breeds. We observe an important within-individual variability where approximately half of the detected structural variants have low frequency (MAF < 0.25). Most of the detected structural variants (55%) occurred in intergenic regions. Genic structural variants overlapped with 7793 genes and the predicted effect of most of them is ranked as "modifier". Among the structural variants that were predicted to have a high functional impact on the protein, a 5.5 Kb in length, highly frequent deletion on chromosome 2, affects ALPI, a gene associated with the interaction between gut microbiota and host immune system. The 6639 newly identified structural variants regions include three deletions and three duplications shared by more than 80% of individuals that are significantly enriched for genes related to tRNA threonylcarbamoyladenosine metabolic process, important for temperature adaptation in thermophilic organisms, therefore suggesting a potential role in the thermotolerance of Creole cattle from Guadeloupe cattle to tropical climate. Overall, highly frequent structural variants that are specific to the Creole cattle population encompass olfactory receptor and immunity genes as well as genes involved in muscle tone, muscle development and contraction. Beyond mapping and characterizing structural variants in the Creole cattle from Guadeloupe breed, this study provides valuable information for a better understanding of the potential role of chromosomal rearrangements in adaptive traits in cattle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Slim Ben-Jemaa
- INRAE, ASSET, 97170, Petit-Bourg, France
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Tunisie, Laboratoire des Productions Animales et Fourragères, Université de Carthage, 2049, Ariana, Tunisia
| | - Mekki Boussaha
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | | | - Philippe Bardou
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (ENVT), 31320, Castanet-Tolosan, France
- Sigenae, INRAE, 31320, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kalbfleisch TS, McKay SD, Murdoch BM, Adelson DL, Almansa-Villa D, Becker G, Beckett LM, Benítez-Galeano MJ, Biase F, Casey T, Chuong E, Clark E, Clarke S, Cockett N, Couldrey C, Davis BW, Elsik CG, Faraut T, Gao Y, Genet C, Grady P, Green J, Green R, Guan D, Hagen D, Hartley GA, Heaton M, Hoyt SJ, Huang W, Jarvis E, Kalleberg J, Khatib H, Koepfi KP, Koltes J, Koren S, Kuehn C, Leeb T, Leonard A, Liu GE, Low WY, McConnell H, McRae K, Miga K, Mousel M, Neibergs H, Olagunju T, Pennell M, Petry B, Pewsner M, Phillippy AM, Pickett BD, Pineda P, Potapova T, Rachagani S, Rhie A, Rijnkels M, Robic A, Rodriguez Osorio N, Safonova Y, Schettini G, Schnabel RD, Sirpu Natesh N, Stegemiller M, Storer J, Stothard P, Stull C, Tosser-Klopp G, Traglia GM, Tuggle CK, Van Tassell CP, Watson C, Weikard R, Wimmers K, Xie S, Yang L, Smith TPL, O'Neill RJ, Rosen BD. The Ruminant Telomere-to-Telomere (RT2T) Consortium. Nat Genet 2024; 56:1566-1573. [PMID: 39103649 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01835-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
Telomere-to-telomere (T2T) assemblies reveal new insights into the structure and function of the previously 'invisible' parts of the genome and allow comparative analyses of complete genomes across entire clades. We present here an open collaborative effort, termed the 'Ruminant T2T Consortium' (RT2T), that aims to generate complete diploid assemblies for numerous species of the Artiodactyla suborder Ruminantia to examine chromosomal evolution in the context of natural selection and domestication of species used as livestock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephanie D McKay
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Brenda M Murdoch
- Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - David L Adelson
- School of Biological Sciences, the University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Diego Almansa-Villa
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay
| | - Gabrielle Becker
- Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Linda M Beckett
- Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - María José Benítez-Galeano
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay
| | - Fernando Biase
- School of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Theresa Casey
- Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Edward Chuong
- BioFrontiers Institute, Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Emily Clark
- The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shannon Clarke
- Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd, Mosgiel, New Zealand
| | - Noelle Cockett
- Department of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
| | | | - Brian W Davis
- Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Christine G Elsik
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Thomas Faraut
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France
| | - Yahui Gao
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA ARS, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Carine Genet
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France
| | - Patrick Grady
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Jonathan Green
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Richard Green
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Dailu Guan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Darren Hagen
- Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA
| | | | - Mike Heaton
- U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, USDA ARS, Clay Center, NE, USA
| | - Savannah J Hoyt
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Wen Huang
- Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Erich Jarvis
- Vertebrate Genome Laboratory, the Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| | - Jenna Kalleberg
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Hasan Khatib
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Klaus-Peter Koepfi
- Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation, George Mason University, Front Royal, VA, USA
- Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA
| | - James Koltes
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | - Sergey Koren
- Genome Informatics Section, Center for Genomics and Data Science Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christa Kuehn
- Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute (German Federal Research Institute for Animal Health), Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany
| | - Tosso Leeb
- Institute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - George E Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA ARS, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Wai Yee Low
- The Davies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hunter McConnell
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Kathryn McRae
- Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd, Mosgiel, New Zealand
| | - Karen Miga
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Biomolecular Engineering Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Michelle Mousel
- Animal Disease Research Unit, USDA ARS, Pullman, WA, USA
- School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - Holly Neibergs
- Department of Animal Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - Temitayo Olagunju
- Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Matt Pennell
- Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bruna Petry
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | - Mirjam Pewsner
- Institute of Fish and Wildlife Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Adam M Phillippy
- Genome Informatics Section, Center for Genomics and Data Science Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brandon D Pickett
- Genome Informatics Section, Center for Genomics and Data Science Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paulene Pineda
- The Davies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tamara Potapova
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Satyanarayana Rachagani
- Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, NextGen Precision Health Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Arang Rhie
- Genome Informatics Section, Center for Genomics and Data Science Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Monique Rijnkels
- Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Annie Robic
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France
| | - Nelida Rodriguez Osorio
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay
| | - Yana Safonova
- Computer Science and Engineering Department, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | - Gustavo Schettini
- School of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Robert D Schnabel
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | | | - Morgan Stegemiller
- Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Jessica Storer
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Paul Stothard
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Caleb Stull
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | | | - Germán M Traglia
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay
| | | | | | - Corey Watson
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Rosemarie Weikard
- Institute of Genome Biology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Klaus Wimmers
- Institute of Genome Biology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Shangqian Xie
- Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Liu Yang
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA ARS, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | | | - Rachel J O'Neill
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
| | - Benjamin D Rosen
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA ARS, Beltsville, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Leonard AS, Mapel XM, Pausch H. Pangenome-genotyped structural variation improves molecular phenotype mapping in cattle. Genome Res 2024; 34:300-309. [PMID: 38355307 PMCID: PMC10984387 DOI: 10.1101/gr.278267.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Expression and splicing quantitative trait loci (e/sQTL) are large contributors to phenotypic variability. Achieving sufficient statistical power for e/sQTL mapping requires large cohorts with both genotypes and molecular phenotypes, and so, the genomic variation is often called from short-read alignments, which are unable to comprehensively resolve structural variation. Here we build a pangenome from 16 HiFi haplotype-resolved cattle assemblies to identify small and structural variation and genotype them with PanGenie in 307 short-read samples. We find high (>90%) concordance of PanGenie-genotyped and DeepVariant-called small variation and confidently genotype close to 21 million small and 43,000 structural variants in the larger population. We validate 85% of these structural variants (with MAF > 0.1) directly with a subset of 25 short-read samples that also have medium coverage HiFi reads. We then conduct e/sQTL mapping with this comprehensive variant set in a subset of 117 cattle that have testis transcriptome data, and find 92 structural variants as causal candidates for eQTL and 73 for sQTL. We find that roughly half of the top associated structural variants affecting expression or splicing are transposable elements, such as SV-eQTL for STN1 and MYH7 and SV-sQTL for CEP89 and ASAH2 Extensive linkage disequilibrium between small and structural variation results in only 28 additional eQTL and 17 sQTL discovered when including SVs, although many top associated SVs are compelling candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xena M Mapel
- Animal Genomics, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hubert Pausch
- Animal Genomics, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Neumann GB, Korkuć P, Reißmann M, Wolf MJ, May K, König S, Brockmann GA. Unmapped short reads from whole-genome sequencing indicate potential infectious pathogens in german black Pied cattle. Vet Res 2023; 54:95. [PMID: 37853447 PMCID: PMC10585868 DOI: 10.1186/s13567-023-01227-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
When resequencing animal genomes, some short reads cannot be mapped to the reference genome and are usually discarded. In this study, unmapped reads from 302 German Black Pied cattle were analyzed to identify potential pathogenic DNA. These unmapped reads were assembled and blasted against NCBI's database to identify bacterial and viral sequences. The results provided evidence for the presence of pathogens. We found sequences of Bovine parvovirus 3 and Mycoplasma species. These findings emphasize the information content of unmapped reads for gaining insight into bacterial and viral infections, which is important for veterinarians and epidemiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme B Neumann
- Animal Breeding Biology and Molecular Genetics, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute for Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paula Korkuć
- Animal Breeding Biology and Molecular Genetics, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute for Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Monika Reißmann
- Animal Breeding Biology and Molecular Genetics, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute for Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Manuel J Wolf
- Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Giessen, Germany
| | - Katharina May
- Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Giessen, Germany
| | - Sven König
- Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Giessen, Germany
| | - Gudrun A Brockmann
- Animal Breeding Biology and Molecular Genetics, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute for Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Dijk EL, Naquin D, Gorrichon K, Jaszczyszyn Y, Ouazahrou R, Thermes C, Hernandez C. Genomics in the long-read sequencing era. Trends Genet 2023; 39:649-671. [PMID: 37230864 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2023.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Long-read sequencing (LRS) technologies have provided extremely powerful tools to explore genomes. While in the early years these methods suffered technical limitations, they have recently made significant progress in terms of read length, throughput, and accuracy and bioinformatics tools have strongly improved. Here, we aim to review the current status of LRS technologies, the development of novel methods, and the impact on genomics research. We will explore the most impactful recent findings made possible by these technologies focusing on high-resolution sequencing of genomes and transcriptomes and the direct detection of DNA and RNA modifications. We will also discuss how LRS methods promise a more comprehensive understanding of human genetic variation, transcriptomics, and epigenetics for the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erwin L van Dijk
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
| | - Delphine Naquin
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Kévin Gorrichon
- National Center of Human Genomics Research (CNRGH), 91000 Évry-Courcouronnes, France
| | - Yan Jaszczyszyn
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Rania Ouazahrou
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Claude Thermes
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Céline Hernandez
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
González-Recio O, López-Catalina A, Peiró-Pastor R, Nieto-Valle A, Castro M, Fernández A. Evaluating the potential of (epi)genotype-by-low pass nanopore sequencing in dairy cattle: a study on direct genomic value and methylation analysis. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2023; 14:98. [PMID: 37434255 PMCID: PMC10337168 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-023-00896-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genotype-by-sequencing has been proposed as an alternative to SNP genotyping arrays in genomic selection to obtain a high density of markers along the genome. It requires a low sequencing depth to be cost effective, which may increase the error at the genotype assigment. Third generation nanopore sequencing technology offers low cost sequencing and the possibility to detect genome methylation, which provides added value to genotype-by-sequencing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of genotype-by-low pass nanopore sequencing for estimating the direct genomic value in dairy cattle, and the possibility to obtain methylation marks simultaneously. RESULTS Latest nanopore chemistry (LSK14 and Q20) achieved a modal base calling accuracy of 99.55%, whereas previous kit (LSK109) achieved slightly lower accuracy (99.1%). The direct genomic value accuracy from genotype-by-low pass sequencing ranged between 0.79 and 0.99, depending on the trait (milk, fat or protein yield), with a sequencing depth as low as 2 × and using the latest chemistry (LSK114). Lower sequencing depth led to biased estimates, yet with high rank correlations. The LSK109 and Q20 achieved lower accuracies (0.57-0.93). More than one million high reliable methylated sites were obtained, even at low sequencing depth, located mainly in distal intergenic (87%) and promoter (5%) regions. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that the latest nanopore technology in useful in a LowPass sequencing framework to estimate direct genomic values with high reliability. It may provide advantages in populations with no available SNP chip, or when a large density of markers with a wide range of allele frequencies is needed. In addition, low pass sequencing provided nucleotide methylation status of > 1 million nucleotides at ≥ 10 × , which is an added value for epigenetic studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar González-Recio
- Dpt. Mejora Genética Animal, INIA-CSIC, Ctra La Coruña Km 7.5, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Ramón Peiró-Pastor
- Dpt. Mejora Genética Animal, INIA-CSIC, Ctra La Coruña Km 7.5, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alicia Nieto-Valle
- ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Ciudad Universitaria S/N, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Monica Castro
- Dpt. Mejora Genética Animal, INIA-CSIC, Ctra La Coruña Km 7.5, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Almudena Fernández
- Dpt. Mejora Genética Animal, INIA-CSIC, Ctra La Coruña Km 7.5, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nguyen TV, Vander Jagt CJ, Wang J, Daetwyler HD, Xiang R, Goddard ME, Nguyen LT, Ross EM, Hayes BJ, Chamberlain AJ, MacLeod IM. Correction: In it for the long run: perspectives on exploiting long-read sequencing in livestock for population scale studies of structural variants. Genet Sel Evol 2023; 55:25. [PMID: 37041461 PMCID: PMC10088245 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00800-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tuan V Nguyen
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.
| | - Christy J Vander Jagt
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
| | - Jianghui Wang
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
| | - Hans D Daetwyler
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
| | - Ruidong Xiang
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Michael E Goddard
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Loan T Nguyen
- Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Elizabeth M Ross
- Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Ben J Hayes
- Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Amanda J Chamberlain
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
| | - Iona M MacLeod
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia
| |
Collapse
|