Role of the highly conserved G68 residue in the yeast phosphorelay protein Ypd1: implications for interactions between histidine phosphotransfer (HPt) and response regulator proteins

The high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway in fungi†

While fungi are widely occupying nature, many species are responsible for devastating mycosis in humans. Such niche diversity explains how quick fungal adaptation is necessary to endow the capacity of withstanding fluctuating environments and to cope with host-imposed conditions. Among all the molecular mechanisms evolved by fungi, the most studied one is the activation of the phosphorelay signalling pathways, of which the high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway constitutes one of the key molecular apparatus underpinning fungal adaptation and virulence. In this review, we summarize the seminal knowledge of the HOG pathway with its more recent developments. We specifically described the HOG-mediated stress adaptation, with a particular focus on osmotic and oxidative stress, and point out some lags in our understanding of its involvement in the virulence of pathogenic species including, the medically important fungi Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus fumigatus, compared to the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Finally, we also highlighted some possible applications of the HOG pathway modifications to improve the fungal-based production of natural products in the industry.

Insights revealed by the co-crystal structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae histidine phosphotransfer protein Ypd1 and the receiver domain of its downstream response regulator Ssk1

Two‐component signaling systems are the primary means by which bacteria, archaea, and certain plants and fungi react to their environments. The model yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, uses the Sln1 signaling pathway to respond to hyperosmotic stress. This pathway contains a hybrid histidine kinase (Sln1) that autophosphorylates and transfers a phosphoryl group to its own receiver domain (R1). The phosphoryl group is then transferred to a histidine phosphotransfer protein (Ypd1) that finally passes it to the receiver domain (R2) of a downstream response regulator (Ssk1). Under normal conditions, Ssk1 is constitutively and preferentially phosphorylated in the phosphorelay. Upon detecting hyperosmotic stress, Ssk1 rapidly dephosphorylates and activates the high‐osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway, initiating a response. Despite their distinct physiological roles, both Sln1 and Ssk1 bind to Ypd1 at a common docking site. Co‐crystal structures of response regulators in complex with their phosphorelay partners are scarce, leaving many mechanistic and structural details uncharacterized for systems like the Sln1 pathway. In this work, we present the co‐crystal structure of Ypd1 and a near wild‐type variant of the receiver domain of Ssk1 (Ssk1‐R2‐W638A) at a resolution of 2.80 Å. Our structural analyses of Ypd1‐receiver domain complexes, biochemical determination of binding affinities for Ssk1‐R2 variants, in silico free energy estimates, and sequence comparisons reveal distinctive electrostatic properties of the Ypd1/Ssk1‐R2‐W638A complex that may provide insight into the regulation of the Sln1 pathway as a function of dynamic osmolyte concentration.

Modeling of Protein⁻Protein Interactions in Cytokinin Signal Transduction

The signaling of cytokinins (CKs), classical plant hormones, is based on the interaction of proteins that constitute the multistep phosphorelay system (MSP): catalytic receptors-sensor histidine kinases (HKs), phosphotransmitters (HPts), and transcription factors-response regulators (RRs). Any CK receptor was shown to interact in vivo with any of the studied HPts and vice versa. In addition, both of these proteins tend to form a homodimer or a heterodimeric complex with protein-paralog. Our study was aimed at explaining by molecular modeling the observed features of in planta protein-protein interactions, accompanying CK signaling. For this purpose, models of CK-signaling proteins' structure from Arabidopsis and potato were built. The modeled interaction interfaces were formed by rather conserved areas of protein surfaces, complementary in hydrophobicity and electrostatic potential. Hot spots amino acids, determining specificity and strength of the interaction, were identified. Virtual phosphorylation of conserved Asp or His residues affected this complementation, increasing (Asp-P in HK) or decreasing (His-P in HPt) the affinity of interacting proteins. The HK-HPt and HPt-HPt interfaces overlapped, sharing some of the hot spots. MSP proteins from Arabidopsis and potato exhibited similar properties. The structural features of the modeled protein complexes were consistent with the experimental data.