Accurate prediction of RNA-binding protein residues with two discriminative structural descriptors

Research progress on prediction of RNA-protein binding sites in the past five years

Accurately predicting RNA-protein binding sites is essential to gain a deeper comprehension of the protein-RNA interactions and their regulatory mechanisms, which are fundamental in gene expression and regulation. However, conventional biological approaches to detect these sites are often costly and time-consuming. In contrast, computational methods for predicting RNA protein binding sites are both cost-effective and expeditious. This review synthesizes already existing computational methods, summarizing commonly used databases for predicting RNA protein binding sites. In addition, applications and innovations of computational methods using traditional machine learning and deep learning for RNA protein binding site prediction during 2018-2023 are presented. These methods cover a wide range of aspects such as effective database utilization, feature selection and encoding, innovative classification algorithms, and evaluation strategies. Exploring the limitations of existing computational methods, this paper delves into the potential directions for future development. DeepRKE, RDense, and DeepDW all employ convolutional neural networks and long and short-term memory networks to construct prediction models, yet their algorithm design and feature encoding differ, resulting in diverse prediction performances.

EPDRNA: A Model for Identifying DNA-RNA Binding Sites in Disease-Related Proteins

Protein-DNA and protein-RNA interactions are involved in many biological processes and regulate many cellular functions. Moreover, they are related to many human diseases. To understand the molecular mechanism of protein-DNA binding and protein-RNA binding, it is important to identify which residues in the protein sequence bind to DNA and RNA. At present, there are few methods for specifically identifying the binding sites of disease-related protein-DNA and protein-RNA. In this study, so we combined four machine learning algorithms into an ensemble classifier (EPDRNA) to predict DNA and RNA binding sites in disease-related proteins. The dataset used in model was collated from UniProt and PDB database, and PSSM, physicochemical properties and amino acid type were used as features. The EPDRNA adopted soft voting and achieved the best AUC value of 0.73 at the DNA binding sites, and the best AUC value of 0.71 at the RNA binding sites in 10-fold cross validation in the training sets. In order to further verify the performance of the model, we assessed EPDRNA for the prediction of DNA-binding sites and the prediction of RNA-binding sites on the independent test dataset. The EPDRNA achieved 85% recall rate and 25% precision on the protein-DNA interaction independent test set, and achieved 82% recall rate and 27% precision on the protein-RNA interaction independent test set. The online EPDRNA webserver is freely available at http://www.s-bioinformatics.cn/epdrna .

A comprehensive review of protein-centric predictors for biomolecular interactions: from proteins to nucleic acids and beyond

Proteins interact with diverse ligands to perform a large number of biological functions, such as gene expression and signal transduction. Accurate identification of these protein-ligand interactions is crucial to the understanding of molecular mechanisms and the development of new drugs. However, traditional biological experiments are time-consuming and expensive. With the development of high-throughput technologies, an increasing amount of protein data is available. In the past decades, many computational methods have been developed to predict protein-ligand interactions. Here, we review a comprehensive set of over 160 protein-ligand interaction predictors, which cover protein-protein, protein-nucleic acid, protein-peptide and protein-other ligands (nucleotide, heme, ion) interactions. We have carried out a comprehensive analysis of the above four types of predictors from several significant perspectives, including their inputs, feature profiles, models, availability, etc. The current methods primarily rely on protein sequences, especially utilizing evolutionary information. The significant improvement in predictions is attributed to deep learning methods. Additionally, sequence-based pretrained models and structure-based approaches are emerging as new trends.

HybridRNAbind: prediction of RNA interacting residues across structure-annotated and disorder-annotated proteins

The sequence-based predictors of RNA-binding residues (RBRs) are trained on either structure-annotated or disorder-annotated binding regions. A recent study of predictors of protein-binding residues shows that they are plagued by high levels of cross-predictions (protein binding residues are predicted as nucleic acid binding) and that structure-trained predictors perform poorly for the disorder-annotated regions and vice versa. Consequently, we analyze a representative set of the structure and disorder trained predictors of RBRs to comprehensively assess quality of their predictions. Our empirical analysis that relies on a new and low-similarity benchmark dataset reveals that the structure-trained predictors of RBRs perform well for the structure-annotated proteins while the disorder-trained predictors provide accurate results for the disorder-annotated proteins. However, these methods work only modestly well on the opposite types of annotations, motivating the need for new solutions. Using an empirical approach, we design HybridRNAbind meta-model that generates accurate predictions and low amounts of cross-predictions when tested on data that combines structure and disorder-annotated RBRs. We release this meta-model as a convenient webserver which is available at https://www.csuligroup.com/hybridRNAbind/.

How to approach machine learning-based prediction of drug/compound-target interactions

The identification of drug/compound-target interactions (DTIs) constitutes the basis of drug discovery, for which computational predictive approaches have been developed. As a relatively new data-driven paradigm, proteochemometric (PCM) modeling utilizes both protein and compound properties as a pair at the input level and processes them via statistical/machine learning. The representation of input samples (i.e., proteins and their ligands) in the form of quantitative feature vectors is crucial for the extraction of interaction-related properties during the artificial learning and subsequent prediction of DTIs. Lately, the representation learning approach, in which input samples are automatically featurized via training and applying a machine/deep learning model, has been utilized in biomedical sciences. In this study, we performed a comprehensive investigation of different computational approaches/techniques for protein featurization (including both conventional approaches and the novel learned embeddings), data preparation and exploration, machine learning-based modeling, and performance evaluation with the aim of achieving better data representations and more successful learning in DTI prediction. For this, we first constructed realistic and challenging benchmark datasets on small, medium, and large scales to be used as reliable gold standards for specific DTI modeling tasks. We developed and applied a network analysis-based splitting strategy to divide datasets into structurally different training and test folds. Using these datasets together with various featurization methods, we trained and tested DTI prediction models and evaluated their performance from different angles. Our main findings can be summarized under 3 items: (i) random splitting of datasets into train and test folds leads to near-complete data memorization and produce highly over-optimistic results, as a result, should be avoided, (ii) learned protein sequence embeddings work well in DTI prediction and offer high potential, despite interaction-related properties (e.g., structures) of proteins are unused during their self-supervised model training, and (iii) during the learning process, PCM models tend to rely heavily on compound features while partially ignoring protein features, primarily due to the inherent bias in DTI data, indicating the requirement for new and unbiased datasets. We hope this study will aid researchers in designing robust and high-performing data-driven DTI prediction systems that have real-world translational value in drug discovery.

To Improve Prediction of Binding Residues With DNA, RNA, Carbohydrate, and Peptide Via Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks

MOTIVATION

The interactions of proteins with DNA, RNA, peptide, and carbohydrate play key roles in various biological processes. The studies of uncharacterized protein-molecules interactions could be aided by accurate predictions of residues that bind with partner molecules. However, the existing methods for predicting binding residues on proteins remain of relatively low accuracies due to the limited number of complex structures in databases. As different types of molecules partially share chemical mechanisms, the predictions for each molecular type should benefit from the binding information with other molecule types.

RESULTS

In this study, we employed a multiple task deep learning strategy to develop a new sequence-based method for simultaneously predicting binding residues/sites with multiple important molecule types named MTDsite. By combining four training sets for DNA, RNA, peptide, and carbohydrate-binding proteins, our method yielded accurate and robust predictions with AUC values of 0.852, 0836, 0.758, and 0.776 on their respective independent test sets, which are 0.52 to 6.6% better than other state-of-the-art methods. To my best knowledge, this is the first method using multi-task framework to predict multiple molecular binding sites simultaneously.

Computational tools to study RNA-protein complexes

RNA is the key player in many cellular processes such as signal transduction, replication, transport, cell division, transcription, and translation. These diverse functions are accomplished through interactions of RNA with proteins. However, protein–RNA interactions are still poorly derstood in contrast to protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions. This knowledge gap can be attributed to the limited availability of protein-RNA structures along with the experimental difficulties in studying these complexes. Recent progress in computational resources has expanded the number of tools available for studying protein-RNA interactions at various molecular levels. These include tools for predicting interacting residues from primary sequences, modelling of protein-RNA complexes, predicting hotspots in these complexes and insights into derstanding in the dynamics of their interactions. Each of these tools has its strengths and limitations, which makes it significant to select an optimal approach for the question of interest. Here we present a mini review of computational tools to study different aspects of protein-RNA interactions, with focus on overall application, development of the field and the future perspectives.

Challenges for machine learning in RNA-protein interaction prediction

RNA-protein interactions have long being recognised as crucial regulators of gene expression. Recently, the development of scalable experimental techniques to measure these interactions has revolutionised the field, leading to the production of large-scale datasets which offer both opportunities and challenges for machine learning techniques. In this brief note, we will discuss some of the major stumbling blocks towards the use of machine learning in computational RNA biology, focusing specifically on the problem of predicting RNA-protein interactions from next-generation sequencing data.

Protein-RNA interaction prediction with deep learning: structure matters

Protein-RNA interactions are of vital importance to a variety of cellular activities. Both experimental and computational techniques have been developed to study the interactions. Because of the limitation of the previous database, especially the lack of protein structure data, most of the existing computational methods rely heavily on the sequence data, with only a small portion of the methods utilizing the structural information. Recently, AlphaFold has revolutionized the entire protein and biology field. Foreseeably, the protein-RNA interaction prediction will also be promoted significantly in the upcoming years. In this work, we give a thorough review of this field, surveying both the binding site and binding preference prediction problems and covering the commonly used datasets, features and models. We also point out the potential challenges and opportunities in this field. This survey summarizes the development of the RNA-binding protein-RNA interaction field in the past and foresees its future development in the post-AlphaFold era.

Prediction of the taxonomical classification of the Ranunculaceae family using a machine learning method

A machine learning method is successfully applied to determine lineage-specific features among various genera within the Ranunculaceae family.

SNB-PSSM: A spatial neighbor-based PSSM used for protein-RNA binding site prediction

Protein-RNA interactions play essential roles in a wide variety of biological processes. Recognition of RNA-binding residues on proteins has been a challenging problem. Most of methods utilize the position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM). It has been found that considering the evolutionary information of sequence neighboring residues can improve the prediction. In this work, we introduce a novel method SNB-PSSM (spatial neighbor-based PSSM) combined with the structure window scheme where the evolutionary information of spatially neighboring residues is considered. The results show our method consistently outperforms the standard and smoothed PSSM methods. Tested on multiple datasets, this approach shows an encouraging performance compared with RNABindRPlus, BindN+, PPRInt, xypan, Predict_RBP, SpaPF, PRNA, and KYG, although is inferior to RNAProSite, RBscore, and aaRNA. In addition, since our method is not sensitive to protein structure changes, it can be applied well on binding site predictions of modeled structures. Thus, the result also suggests the evolution of binding sites is spatially cooperative. The proposed method as an effective tool of considering evolutionary information can be widely used for the nucleic acid-/protein-binding site prediction and functional motif finding.

Predicting Hot Spot Residues at Protein-DNA Binding Interfaces Based on Sequence Information

Hot spot residues at protein-DNA binding interfaces are hugely important for investigating the underlying mechanism of molecular recognition. Currently, there are a few tools available for identifying the hot spot residues in the protein-DNA complexes. In addition, the three-dimensional protein structures are needed in these tools. However, it is well known that the three-dimensional structures are unavailable for most proteins. Considering the limitation, we proposed a method, named SPDH, for predicting hot spot residues only based on protein sequences. Firstly, we obtained 133 features from physicochemical property, conservation, predicted solvent accessible surface area and structure. Then, we systematically assessed these features based on various feature selection methods to obtain the optimal feature subset and compared the models using four classical machine learning algorithms (support vector machine, random forest, logistic regression, and k-nearest neighbor) on the training dataset. We found that the variability of physicochemical property features between wild and mutative types was important on improving the performance of the prediction model. On the independent test set, our method achieved the performance with AUC of 0.760 and sensitivity of 0.808, and outperformed other methods. The data and source code can be downloaded at https://github.com/xialab-ahu/SPDH .

Comprehensive Survey and Comparative Assessment of RNA-Binding Residue Predictions with Analysis by RNA Type

With close to 30 sequence-based predictors of RNA-binding residues (RBRs), this comparative survey aims to help with understanding and selection of the appropriate tools. We discuss past reviews on this topic, survey a comprehensive collection of predictors, and comparatively assess six representative methods. We provide a novel and well-designed benchmark dataset and we are the first to report and compare protein-level and datasets-level results, and to contextualize performance to specific types of RNAs. The methods considered here are well-cited and rely on machine learning algorithms on occasion combined with homology-based prediction. Empirical tests reveal that they provide relatively accurate predictions. Virtually all methods perform well for the proteins that interact with rRNAs, some generate accurate predictions for mRNAs, snRNA, SRP and IRES, while proteins that bind tRNAs are predicted poorly. Moreover, except for DRNApred, they confuse DNA and RNA-binding residues. None of the six methods consistently outperforms the others when tested on individual proteins. This variable and complementary protein-level performance suggests that users should not rely on applying just the single best dataset-level predictor. We recommend that future work should focus on the development of approaches that facilitate protein-level selection of accurate predictors and the consensus-based prediction of RBRs.

Recent Advances in Machine Learning Based Prediction of RNA-protein Interactions

The interactions between RNAs and proteins play critical roles in many biological processes. Therefore, characterizing these interactions becomes critical for mechanistic, biomedical, and clinical studies. Many experimental methods can be used to determine RNA-protein interactions in multiple aspects. However, due to the facts that RNA-protein interactions are tissuespecific and condition-specific, as well as these interactions are weak and frequently compete with each other, those experimental techniques can not be made full use of to discover the complete spectrum of RNA-protein interactions. To moderate these issues, continuous efforts have been devoted to developing high quality computational techniques to study the interactions between RNAs and proteins. Many important progresses have been achieved with the application of novel techniques and strategies, such as machine learning techniques. Especially, with the development and application of CLIP techniques, more and more experimental data on RNA-protein interaction under specific biological conditions are available. These CLIP data altogether provide a rich source for developing advanced machine learning predictors. In this review, recent progresses on computational predictors for RNA-protein interaction were summarized in the following aspects: dataset, prediction strategies, and input features. Possible future developments were also discussed at the end of the review.

Recent applications of deep learning and machine intelligence on in silico drug discovery: methods, tools and databases

The identification of interactions between drugs/compounds and their targets is crucial for the development of new drugs. In vitro screening experiments (i.e. bioassays) are frequently used for this purpose; however, experimental approaches are insufficient to explore novel drug-target interactions, mainly because of feasibility problems, as they are labour intensive, costly and time consuming. A computational field known as 'virtual screening' (VS) has emerged in the past decades to aid experimental drug discovery studies by statistically estimating unknown bio-interactions between compounds and biological targets. These methods use the physico-chemical and structural properties of compounds and/or target proteins along with the experimentally verified bio-interaction information to generate predictive models. Lately, sophisticated machine learning techniques are applied in VS to elevate the predictive performance. The objective of this study is to examine and discuss the recent applications of machine learning techniques in VS, including deep learning, which became highly popular after giving rise to epochal developments in the fields of computer vision and natural language processing. The past 3 years have witnessed an unprecedented amount of research studies considering the application of deep learning in biomedicine, including computational drug discovery. In this review, we first describe the main instruments of VS methods, including compound and protein features (i.e. representations and descriptors), frequently used libraries and toolkits for VS, bioactivity databases and gold-standard data sets for system training and benchmarking. We subsequently review recent VS studies with a strong emphasis on deep learning applications. Finally, we discuss the present state of the field, including the current challenges and suggest future directions. We believe that this survey will provide insight to the researchers working in the field of computational drug discovery in terms of comprehending and developing novel bio-prediction methods.

Individually double minimum-distance definition of protein-RNA binding residues and application to structure-based prediction

Identifying protein-RNA binding residues is essential for understanding the mechanism of protein-RNA interactions. So far, rigid distance thresholds are commonly used to define protein-RNA binding residues. However, after investigating 182 non-redundant protein-RNA complexes, we find that it would be unsuitable for a certain amount of complexes since the distances between proteins and RNAs vary widely. In this work, a novel definition method was proposed based on a flexible distance cutoff. This method can fully consider the individual differences among complexes by setting a variable tolerance limit of protein-RNA interactions, i.e. the double minimum-distance by which different distance thresholds are achieved for different complexes. In order to validate our method, a comprehensive comparison between our flexible method and traditional rigid methods was implemented in terms of interface structure, amino acid composition, interface area and interaction force, etc. The results indicate that this method is more reasonable because it incorporates the specificity of different complexes by extracting the important residues lost by rigid distance methods and discarding some redundant residues. Finally, to further test our double minimum-distance definition strategy, we developed a classifier to predict those binding sites derived from our new method by using structural features and a random forest machine learning algorithm. The model achieved a satisfactory prediction performance and the accuracy on independent data sets reaches to 85.0%. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first prediction model to define positive and negative samples using a flexible cutoff. So the comparison analysis and modeling results have demonstrated that our method would be a very promising strategy for more precisely defining protein-RNA binding sites.

Comprehensive review and empirical analysis of hallmarks of DNA-, RNA- and protein-binding residues in protein chains

Proteins interact with a variety of molecules including proteins and nucleic acids. We review a comprehensive collection of over 50 studies that analyze and/or predict these interactions. While majority of these studies address either solely protein–DNA or protein–RNA binding, only a few have a wider scope that covers both protein–protein and protein–nucleic acid binding. Our analysis reveals that binding residues are typically characterized with three hallmarks: relative solvent accessibility (RSA), evolutionary conservation and propensity of amino acids (AAs) for binding. Motivated by drawbacks of the prior studies, we perform a large-scale analysis to quantify and contrast the three hallmarks for residues that bind DNA-, RNA-, protein- and (for the first time) multi-ligand-binding residues that interact with DNA and proteins, and with RNA and proteins. Results generated on a well-annotated data set of over 23 000 proteins show that conservation of binding residues is higher for nucleic acid- than protein-binding residues. Multi-ligand-binding residues are more conserved and have higher RSA than single-ligand-binding residues. We empirically show that each hallmark discriminates between binding and nonbinding residues, even predicted RSA, and that combining them improves discriminatory power for each of the five types of interactions. Linear scoring functions that combine these hallmarks offer good predictive performance of residue-level propensity for binding and provide intuitive interpretation of predictions. Better understanding of these residue-level interactions will facilitate development of methods that accurately predict binding in the exponentially growing databases of protein sequences.

Protein-RNA interactions: structural biology and computational modeling techniques

RNA-binding proteins are functionally diverse within cells, being involved in RNA-metabolism, translation, DNA damage repair, and gene regulation at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Much has been learnt about their interactions with RNAs through structure determination techniques and computational modeling. This review gives an overview of the structural data currently available for protein-RNA complexes, and discusses the technical issues facing structural biologists working to solve their structures. The review focuses on three techniques used to solve the 3-dimensional structure of protein-RNA complexes at atomic resolution, namely X-ray crystallography, solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). The review then focuses on the main computational modeling techniques that use these atomic resolution data: discussing the prediction of RNA-binding sites on unbound proteins, docking proteins, and RNAs, and modeling the molecular dynamics of the systems. In conclusion, the review looks at the future directions this field of research might take.