Influence of mechanical and TGF-β3 stimulation on the tenogenic differentiation of tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells

A systematic investigation of the effects of TGF-β3 and mechanical stimulation on tenogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells in a poly(ethylene glycol)/gelatin-based hydrogel

Background

High post-surgical failure rates following tendon injury generate high medical costs and poor patient recovery. Cell-based tendon tissue engineering has the potential to produce fully functional replacement tissue and provide new strategies to restore tendon function and healing. In this endeavour, the application of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) encapsulated in biomaterial scaffolds has shown great promise. However, a consensus on optimal promotion of tenogenic differentiation of MSCs has yet to be reached, although growth factors and mechanical cues are generally acknowledged as important factors.

Methods

In this study, we prepared a hydrogel cell culture system consisting of methacrylated poly(d,l-lactic acid-ethylene glycol-d,l-lactic acid) (P(LA-EG-LA)) and gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) to encapsulate human bone marrow-derived MSCs (hBMSCs). We further systematically investigated the influence of static and intermittent cyclic uniaxial strain mechanical stimulation, in combination with transforming growth factor-β3 (TGF-β3) supplementation, on tenogenic differentiation of hBMSCs.

Results

Increased TGF-β3 concentration upregulated the tenogenic genes Scleraxis (SCX) and collagen type I (COL1A1) but showed no effects on tenascin-c (TNC) and collagen type III (COL3A1) expression. Mechanical stimulation had no observable effect on gene expression, but intermittent cyclic uniaxial strain stimulation improved matrix deposition. Together, these data provide new insights into how TGF-β3 and mechanical stimulation regulate MSC tenogenesis, with TGF-β3 promoting the expression of key tenogenic genes whilst mechanical stimulation aided matrix deposition in the engineered tissue. Furthermore, intermittent cyclic uniaxial strain at 3% elongation and 0.33 ​Hz for 1 ​h/day showed improved matrix effects compared to static strain.

Conclusion

Together, the most promising result for tenogenic differentiation of hBMSCs was identified as treatment with 5 ​ng/ml TGF-β3 under intermittent cyclic uniaxial strain (3% strain; 0.33 ​Hz; 1 ​h/day). This knowledge is of importance for the development of an improved protocol for tenogenic differentiation of MSCs and thereby for tendon tissue engineering.

The translational potential of this article

Tissue-engineered strategies for tendon repair require a consensus on the differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells to tenocytes, which is currently lacking. This article provides a systematic investigation of two main tenogenic differentiation conditions to further development of a tenogenic differentiation protocol.

Growth factors in the treatment of Achilles tendon injury

Achilles tendon (AT) injury is one of the most common tendon injuries, especially in athletes, the elderly, and working-age people. In AT injury, the biomechanical properties of the tendon are severely affected, leading to abnormal function. In recent years, many efforts have been underway to develop effective treatments for AT injuries to enable patients to return to sports faster. For instance, several new techniques for tissue-engineered biological augmentation for tendon healing, growth factors (GFs), gene therapy, and mesenchymal stem cells were introduced. Increasing evidence has suggested that GFs can reduce inflammation, promote extracellular matrix production, and accelerate AT repair. In this review, we highlighted some recent investigations regarding the role of GFs, such as transforming GF-β(TGF-β), bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP), fibroblast GF (FGF), vascular endothelial GF (VEGF), platelet-derived GF (PDGF), and insulin-like GF (IGF), in tendon healing. In addition, we summarized the clinical trials and animal experiments on the efficacy of GFs in AT repair. We also highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of the different isoforms of TGF-β and BMPs, including GFs combined with stem cells, scaffolds, or other GFs. The strategies discussed in this review are currently in the early stages of development. It is noteworthy that although these emerging technologies may potentially develop into substantial clinical treatment options for AT injury, definitive conclusions on the use of these techniques for routine management of tendon ailments could not be drawn due to the lack of data.

Advanced Robotics to Address the Translational Gap in Tendon Engineering

Tendon disease is a significant and growing burden to healthcare systems. One strategy to address this challenge is tissue engineering. A widely held view in this field is that mechanical stimulation provided to constructs should replicate the mechanical environment of native tissue as closely as possible. We review recent tendon tissue engineering studies in this article and highlight limitations of conventional uniaxial tensile bioreactors used in current literature. Advanced robotic platforms such as musculoskeletal humanoid robots and soft robotic actuators are promising technologies which may help address translational gaps in tendon tissue engineering. We suggest the proposed benefits of these technologies and identify recent studies which have worked to implement these technologies in tissue engineering. Lastly, key challenges to address in adapting these robotic technologies and proposed future research directions for tendon tissue engineering are discussed.